[PDF] Top 20 The influence of context on the effectiveness of hospital quality improvement strategies: a review of systematic reviews

... assess context factors, which has implications for the reviews included in our umbrella ...categorize context factors and facilitate data extraction from the literature, the lack of clear search ... See full document

... this review with the one it updates [7], it appears that many implementation fac- tors are consistent over time, such as the prevailing focus on organisational issues including the need for ad- equate resources, ... See full document

... tematic review by Leung, Chan et ...this context is that despite the inter- est of scientists in this issue, they may neglect in report- ing this index in the article or the scholars who conducted ... See full document

... the effectiveness of CQI inter- ventions in health and social care would be ...A systematic review comparing different CQI models and other active comparisons may help to identify the elements of ... See full document

... this review This umbrella review, like any other research, has its limita- tions, and these need to be acknowledged in the context of the ...these systematic reviews, the heterogeneity ... See full document

... our review was intentionally focused neither on speci fi c populations nor on any particular intervention per se, rather on reported outcomes and whether they were salutogenic or ...the effectiveness of ... See full document

... the effectiveness of QI interventions that target patient ...or hospital departments develop structured plans on how to use patient feedback for QI and methods to engage clinicians in this ...an ... See full document

... the effectiveness of QI interventions that target patient ...or hospital departments develop structured plans on how to use patient feedback for QI and methods to engage clinicians in this ...an ... See full document

... among hospital personnel could have a considerable impact on HAIs, healthcare costs, and patients’ health and quality of ...Yet, reviews with detailed examination of the active content of ... See full document

... A cross-sectional study of the number and frequency of terms used to refer to knowledge translation in a body of health literature in 2006: a Tower of Babel? Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):16. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-16. 19. ... See full document

... adopted quality improvement (QI) strategies, such as implementing clinical practice guidelines, intended to standardize the approach to bronchi- olitis or to operationalize recommen- dations made in ... See full document

... results that allowed a direct comparison between the ori- ginal intervention and the results of facilitating the spread of the intervention through a toolkit. The reported detail in the included studies varied widely and ... See full document

... First, irrelevant studies not fulfilling the inclusion cri- teria for the systematic review will be excluded by read- ing the title and then by reading the abstract of the articles. Next, the full articles ... See full document

... collection strategies should be promoted to adolescents via social media because social media is a popular portal for teenagers to exchange and share information 63 ... See full document

... the quality of systematic reviews by adopting four ...of systematic reviews publish or provide protocols for their reviews that adhere to current best practices ...for ... See full document

... Across reviews and included single studies, it is apparent that in- dividual level interventions are investigated for cost-e ff ectiveness more ...methodological quality are generally much more difficult to ... See full document

... There are several important implications of this review. Only 19 of the 76 studies focused on pre-dialysis CKD with only four occurring in patients where kidney disease strikes early (pediatrics). With the ... See full document

... published reviews (45% vs 27%), data on economic outcome measures were less frequently reported (65% vs ...our review is a systematic review of systematic reviews and ... See full document

... methodological quality assessment of primary studies was an important part in systematic ...Different reviews used different criteria to assess the risk of bias, such as Jadad, PEDro and Cochrane ... See full document

... There was also clinical variation in the primary studies in terms of indications and timing of surgery and it is possible that these between study differences could be a source of the substantial heterogeneity. For ... See full document