[PDF] Top 20 2002 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 21 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 37 (2002)

... The First District Court of Appeals affirmed the circuit court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Haul n' Ride. The court of appeals de- termined that Alazork failed t[r] ... See full document

... district court did not err in its re- fusal to grant sanctions because it could no longer comply with the dis- covery order due to the deletion of information pursuant to the “routine, good-faith operation” ... See full document

... of law to have a legitimate interest or ...of law that private facts as to such persons are also within the area of legitimate public interest could indirectly expose everyone’s private life to public ...of ... See full document

... The First District Court of Appeals of the State of Marshall affirmed the trial court's quashing of the Plaintiff-Appellant's subpoena of the identity and medical records [r] ... See full document

... The Court of Appeals for the State of Marshall affirmed the Circuit Court's granting of summary judgment in favor of NSI on both claims. The Court of Appeals concurred[r] ... See full document

... common law liability). The facts in the record establish, as a matter of law, that the photographs published of Nevilson were of a legitimate public concern, thus defeating Nevilson’s claim of publication ... See full document

... life-long Marshall resident Duffy O’Plenty (“O’Plenty”), is a family-owned, family-led ...of Marshall City, the capital of the State of ...in Marshall City and the sur- rounding ... See full document

... Supreme Court has long held that the First Amendment imposes limits on the extent to which state tort law, regardless of the specific tort claim, may im- pose liability for communicative ...the ... See full document

... this court that he had no knowledge of the provision (R. 10), the trial court did not make a specific finding of fact one way or ...the Marshall State Uni- versity Law Center, and presumably ... See full document

... A jury applying the Hill factors could conclude that a reasonable person would find the false portrayal highly offensive. First, MarshCODE’s false statement exhibited a high degree of intrusion be- cause it disclosed Mr. ... See full document

... the information given pub- licity. In Cinel v. Connick, information regarding sexually-explicit and potentially illegal photographs and video was leaked from a criminal in- ...The court rejected ... See full document

... The First District Court of Appeals affirmed the circuit court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Haul n' Ride. The court of appeals de- termined that Alazork failed t[r] ... See full document

... The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Petitioner alleges that the emanations generated by the display of data on Petitioner's computer monitor are an &[r] ... See full document

... Nevilson excelled under the direction of Coach Tim. He went on to win first or second place in all the athletic competitions in which he par- ticipated, culminating in his winning three gold medals in the 2007 Jun- ior ... See full document

... STATUTORY AND RESTATEMENT PROVISIONS ... THE COURT OF APPEALS CORRECTLY AFFIRMED THE DECISION THAT PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER DOSPAM WAS PROPER BECAUSE THE EXERCISE OF[r] ... See full document

... The First District Court of Appeals of the State of Marshall affirmed the trial court's quashing of the Plaintiff-Appellant's subpoena of the identity and medical records [r] ... See full document

... The trial court properly granted summary judgment on all four counts because Appellee failed to show any genuine issue of material fact, even when the evidence is [r] ... See full document

... The court of appeals was correct when it held Petitioner liable under the Statute for creating child pornography and disseminating it to a mi- nor. Petitioner's interactive se[r] ... See full document

... The Court of Appeals for the State of Marshall affirmed the Circuit Court's granting of summary judgment in favor of NSI on both claims. The Court of Appeals concurred[r] ... See full document

... The trial court held that Jacobs was subject to personal jurisdiction in the State of Marshall under the Marshall long-arm statute. at 5.) As to Jacobs claim that Jennife[r] ... See full document