[PDF] Top 20 Study protocol: a systematic review of pediatric shared decision making

... Background: Shared decision making in pediatrics is unique because it often involves active participation of both the child or adolescent patient and his or her caregiver(s) in the decision ... See full document

... first systematic review to focus on the barriers and facilitators of SDM in pediatric clinical practice and is strengthened by the presentation of multiple perspectives ...a systematic ... See full document

... health/social decision-making ...Ottawa Decision Support Framework and previous decisional needs assessments, and as appropriate may be adapted to findings from the systematic ...participant ... See full document

... Competing health concerns present real obstacles to people living with diabetes and other chronic disease and their primary care providers. Guideline implementa- tion interventions to date do not acknowledge these ... See full document

... case study is a self-reported case study published in the Journal of the American Medical ...promoting shared decision- making in naturalistic ...Barry’s study, it is worth ... See full document

... It is anticipated that the operational definitions and time points of these outcomes will vary across studies. As such, studies that meet these criteria will be included irrespective of how the outcome has been defined ... See full document

... realist review methodology is complex and still evolving, this protocol outlines a detailed process to add to the evolution of this research ...this review fol- lows a literature informed and ... See full document

... Two review- ers (FL and KG) extracted data independently using a data extraction ...this review was conducted and to the best of our knowledge, there was no taxonomy for assessing barriers and facilitators ... See full document

... Data on both SDM (e.g., conversation duration, patient participation, knowledge, and decisional conflict) and health outcomes (patient-reported, surrogate, and clin- ical outcomes) were collected. Standardized mean ... See full document

... of shared decision making increased with consultation ...recent systematic review, which concluded that longer consultations usually coincide with higher levels of shared ... See full document

... Cochrane review of IP educational inter- ventions that identified six studies, [24] of which four had positive outcomes: one on emergency department culture and patient satisfaction, another on collaborative team ... See full document

... There are several limitations in our study that could have prevented relevant studies to be included in our review. For instance, the grey literature was not exam- ined, experts in the SDM field were not ... See full document

... each study, a note will be made of the decision rules used in the experiments ...(e.g., decision by unanimity vs ...this study, we will consider only the effect of being in a group irrespec- ... See full document

... a review of the literature and their clinical experience, some of the researchers in the team (ML, FR, RG) have already identified 10 genetic topics and 13 gen- eral clinical, non-genetic topics that respond to ... See full document

... cognitive and clinical outcomes of each trial. Addition- ally, for each trial, we will report the extent to which the DA/SDM arm impacted the actual care that the patients received, as compared to the usual care/active ... See full document

... a shared understanding of the treatment goals ...the decision making process ...of decision aids. Decision aids are tools which can be used to facilitate SDM and are defined by the ... See full document

... our systematic review (submission will take place around December 2017), ongoing studies will be included when data extraction for included studies is completed (September ... See full document

... One study used a mixed method [34], which is a way to achieve the best research outcome ...Another study employed an exploratory trial that was described as an artificial situation ...One study ... See full document

... the study arm (intervention arm or control arm) assignment, patient name, clinician name, and clin- ical ...both study arms; therefore, no observational bias would be introduced into the comparison of the ... See full document

... [4]. Decision aids, tools to help involve patients in decision making by clearly and accessibly presenting the available options and their relative advantages and disad- vantages, may facilitate ... See full document