195 CHAPTER SIX: EVALUATION AND CONCLUSION
196 Since their creation, individual Arab states had never hesitated to give priority to their separate interests. Yet they had been persuaded by their perceived lack of legitimacy to pledged formal fidelity to the Arab nation, and thus risked being dragged into crises generated by other Arab states, or being accused of breaking Arab ranks for staying out. Kamal Salibi, Lebanon‘s prominent historian criticized Arab nationalism for deluding the general run of the Arabs into believing that the political unity they had once experienced under Islam was in fact an Arab national unity which have subsequently lost, or of which they have been deliberately robbed. I think this made it difficult for them to properly accommodate the political realities of the present.
The flood of oil income that followed the 1973 war also permitted regimes to buy off the dissent.
The states had not only become illegitimately legitimate, they become omnipotent. In the words of one Syrian intellectual: the cancerous growth of the state has been accompanied by the increasingly diminished power of everybody and everything else, especially what some Arab thinkers and leaders enjoy calling ―The people.‖ As a consequence, Arab society is on the whole cancelled out as a reality of political significance in the reckonings of all Arab regimes.
By the time communism collapsed, the Arab lands had become the last preserve for protracted one-man rule. The Arab rulers have no sense of time, history or strategic direction – often they live in modern prison cells – called palaces built with petrodollars – stolen money from public treasury. People live in fear of being annihilated by the ruthless forces of the authoritarian rulers.
But the men – the rulers who were universally hated and feared claim to have achieved major milestones by their secretive police gangs, ruthlessness and success leading to degeneration and savagery of vicious acts against the very people they claim to serve and govern. The leaders‘ first step always was the consolidation of the ruling families and their transformation into political institutions which owned the state. The real meaning of the consolidation of the family was the
197 entrenchment of central decision-making at the highest bureaucratic level in the ruling elite. The efforts of the ruling families extended, through the monopolization of government and wealth, to the prevention of the rise of social and political forces independent of the state, expressing the interests and ambitions of various groups of the population. Thus they prevent the rise of political parties, proscribe the establishment of social and political movements which are not loyal to them, suppressed trade unions and similar organization, recognizing them only as public service associations. They extend an iron grip upon school curricula, and suffocating censorship is generally imposed upon the information media, and mass communications, as well as the penetration of the religious institutions.
In relation to their chief religion – Islam, Arab nationalism erred strongly in breaking the primary bond of Islam during the Arab Revolt during the colonial presence, when some Arab nationalists betrayed their fellow Muslim in order to side with the British, who naturally betrayed them – a just reward for those who placed their trust in unbelievers, some Muslims will conclude. Some leaders of Arab nations compounded their error by abandoning reliance on God and his divine law, in order to become liberals, fascists and socialists, in mimicry of foreign ideological fashion.
And while they professed respect for the faith of Islam, they filled their prisons with the truly faithful, whom they accused of subversion for preaching the word of God. The religious authorities in Arab nations armed with this spurious tradition are ever ready to sanction tyranny and repress freedom. Hence, among Arabs and Muslims, the worst of tyrants are frequently men in religious garb, preaching their bigotry from the sanctity of mosques and legitimizing their cruelty in Allah‘s name. This is what occurred in Iran in 1979 when Iranian nationalists, supported by religious authorities, painted the Shar of Iran as a monster supported by the U.S.
and drove him out.
198 The Arab World in my understanding is not the only people colonized. Imperialism dotted the history of many nations. Africa has suffered the sit-tight agenda of rulers. The economic equation has never been equal or near equal in Africa and in other climes. Rigging and inconclusive elections have consistently been reported in many parts of the world. Civil society organization and Amnesty International have records upon records of human rights abuses registered around the world. People have revolted against imperialism before and now, but they moved on when the common enemy disappeared. In all, the Arabs have generally refused to move on. Their preference to hostility and terrorism has constantly ridiculed their revered religion – Islam. Some of their sit-tight rulers have been guarded, supported, encouraged and even adored by some Arabs who should have made moves. Economic inequality is almost constant in every nation of the world, but I think this evil has propelled many to face hard work and determination than violence, intimidation and show of hatred to wrong persons.
The Arabs should not opt for freedom from foreigners. This may breed resentment and ingratitude. The shoe thrown at George W. Bush, the then American President in Baghdad by Iraqi journalist was ever revealing about Arab and Muslim temperament. The worst display of Arab sickness however was the extent to which Iraqis descended into the barbarity of sectarian violence after freedom was brought to them, instead of seizing upon the opportunity to build a prosperous society. Egyptians have gone forward not surprisingly after overthrowing a dictator – overwhelming members to vote for the sort of religious – based authoritarian rule from which Iranians wish to escape.
The West needs to understand the present tumult in the Arab–Muslim world is part of an immensely complex historical convulsion. Only after Muslims have drunk in full measure from the poisoned tumbler of Islamism will they eventually learn with sufficient humility what
199 freedom means and democracy requires. Since the West cannot fast forward history of Muslims, it should decide with wisdom and prudence to leave the Arab-Muslim world to find its own path towards a decent future.