4.1 Descriptive Statistics
4.1.3 Case B Descriptive Statistics
4.1.3.1 Stage 1 - Group Working Relationships.
Table 4:9 and Graph 4:9 present the descriptive statistics and the cumulative percentages for the GWRCS codes for Case B
150
Case A/ Stage 4 - Cumulative percentages of MACS codes.
Stage 4, the mean time spent on the MACS codes observed was 57 seconds, with a st. deviation of 56 seconds, for the 23 sequential instances (i.e. valid of six MACS codes (Graph 4:8). The total time spent in stage 4 was 1319
It can be observed that for Case A - Stage 4 most of the time was spent in Typing and No Model Appropriations, with small amounts of time being spent in Unfocussed and Direct during Typing periods of interaction.
Descriptive Statistics.
Group Working Relationships.
Table 4:9 and Graph 4:9 present the descriptive statistics and the cumulative percentages for the GWRCS codes for Case B - Stage 1 respectively.
Cumulative percentages of MACS codes.
Stage 4, the mean time spent on the MACS codes observed was 57 seconds, with a st. deviation of 56 seconds, for the 23 sequential instances (i.e. valid of six MACS codes (Graph 4:8). The total time spent in stage 4 was 1319
Stage 4 most of the time was spent in Typing and No Model Appropriations, with small amounts of time being spent in
Table 4:9 and Graph 4:9 present the descriptive statistics and the cumulative Stage 1 respectively.
Table 4:9 Case B / Stage 1 / GWR
Graph 4:9 Case B/ Stage 1
For Case B - Stage 1, the m
180 seconds, with a st. deviation of 157 seconds, for the 7 sequential instances (i.e. valid N) of three GWRCS codes (Graph 4:9). The total time spent in stage 1 was 1260 seconds.
151
Case B / Stage 1 / GWRCS - Descriptive Statistics.
Case B/ Stage 1 - Cumulative percentages of GWR
Stage 1, the mean time spent on the GWRCS codes observed was 180 seconds, with a st. deviation of 157 seconds, for the 7 sequential instances (i.e. valid N) of three GWRCS codes (Graph 4:9). The total time spent in stage 1 was
Statistics GWRCS time_secs N Valid 7 7 M issing 0 0 M ean 179.9357 S td. Error of Mean 59.17345 M edian 139.9500 M ode 27.99 S td. Deviation 156.55824 Variance 24510.483 Ra nge 363.87 M inimum 27.99 M aximum 391.86 S um 1259.55 Descriptive Statistics.
Cumulative percentages of GWRCS codes.
ean time spent on the GWRCS codes observed was 180 seconds, with a st. deviation of 157 seconds, for the 7 sequential instances (i.e. valid N) of three GWRCS codes (Graph 4:9). The total time spent in stage 1 was
152
It can be observed that for Case B - Stage 1 most of the time was spent in Focussed Work and Typing, with small amounts of time spent on out-of-focus interaction. No conflict-related interaction was observed in stage 1.
4.1.3.2 Stage 2 - Group Working Relationships.
Table 4:10 and Graph 4:10 present the descriptive statistics and the cumulative percentages of the GWRCS codes for Case B - Stage 2 respectively.
Table 4:10 Case B / Stage 2 / GWRCS - Descriptive Statistics.
Statistics GWRCS time_secs N Valid 45 45 Missing 0 0 Mean 57.2240 Std. Error of Mean 7.27912 Median 27.9900 Mode 27.99 Std. Deviation 48.82979 Variance 2384.349 Range 251.91 Minimum 27.99 Maximum 279.90 Sum 2575.08
Graph 4:10 Case B/ Stage 2
For Case B - Stage 2, the mean time spent on the GWRCS codes observed was 57 seconds, with a st. deviation of 49 seconds, for the 45 sequential instances (i.e. N) of six GWRCS codes (Graph 4:10). The total time spent in stage 2 was 2575 seconds.
It can be observed that for Case B
and Focussed Work with most of Opposition being resolved through Open Discussion.
Rather interestingly no Typing periods have been observed for stage 2. No typing meant that the group focussed solely on the development and analysis of the model concepts gathered in stage 1 with no new concepts added in a group fashion. This does not go to say that the model remained the same, it merely presents a situation in which no new distinct concepts were gathered in a group fashion, utilising the technology at hand.
153
Case B/ Stage 2 - Cumulative percentages of GWR
Stage 2, the mean time spent on the GWRCS codes observed was 57 seconds, with a st. deviation of 49 seconds, for the 45 sequential instances (i.e. N) of six GWRCS codes (Graph 4:10). The total time spent in stage 2 was 2575
It can be observed that for Case B - Stage 2 most of the time was spent in Critical and Focussed Work with most of Opposition being resolved through Open
Rather interestingly no Typing periods have been observed for stage 2. No typing at the group focussed solely on the development and analysis of the model concepts gathered in stage 1 with no new concepts added in a group fashion. This does not go to say that the model remained the same, it merely presents a situation in istinct concepts were gathered in a group fashion, utilising the
Cumulative percentages of GWRCS codes.
Stage 2, the mean time spent on the GWRCS codes observed was 57 seconds, with a st. deviation of 49 seconds, for the 45 sequential instances (i.e. valid N) of six GWRCS codes (Graph 4:10). The total time spent in stage 2 was 2575
Stage 2 most of the time was spent in Critical and Focussed Work with most of Opposition being resolved through Open
Rather interestingly no Typing periods have been observed for stage 2. No typing at the group focussed solely on the development and analysis of the model- concepts gathered in stage 1 with no new concepts added in a group fashion. This does not go to say that the model remained the same, it merely presents a situation in istinct concepts were gathered in a group fashion, utilising the
4.1.3.3 Stage 3 - Group Working Relationships.
Table 4:11 and Graph 4:11 present the descriptive statistics and the cumulative percentages of the GWRCS codes for Case B
Table 4:11 Case B / Stage 3
Graph 4:11 Case B/ Stage 3
154
Group Working Relationships.
Table 4:11 and Graph 4:11 present the descriptive statistics and the cumulative percentages of the GWRCS codes for Case B - Stage 3 respectively.
Case B / Stage 3 / GWRCS - Descriptive Statistics.
Case B/ Stage 3 - Cumulative percentages of GWR
Statistics GWRCS time_secs N Valid 18 18 Missing 0 0 Mean 73.0850 Std. Error of Mean 17.69359 Median 41.9850 Mode 27.99 Std. Deviation 75.06754 Variance 5635.136 Range 251.91 Minimum 27.99 Maximum 279.90 Sum 1315.53
Table 4:11 and Graph 4:11 present the descriptive statistics and the cumulative respectively.
Descriptive Statistics.
155
For Case B - Stage 3, the mean time spent on the GWRCS codes observed was 73 seconds, with a st. deviation of 75 seconds, for the 18 sequential instances (i.e. valid N) of six GWRCS codes (Graph 4:11). The total time spent in stage 3 was 1315 seconds.
It can be observed that for Case B - Stage 3 most of the time was spent in Critical and Focussed Work with most of Opposition being resolved through Open Discussion.
Similarly to stage 2, no time was spent in Typing.
4.1.3.4 Stage 4 - Group Working Relationships.
Table 4:12 and Graph 4:12 present the descriptive statistics and the cumulative percentages of the GWRCS codes for Case B - Stage 4 respectively.
Table 4:12 Case B / Stage 4 / GWRCS - Descriptive Statistics.
Statistics GWRCS time_secs N Valid 27 27 M issing 0 0 M ean 119.2167 S td. Error of Mean 25.02577 M edian 55.9800 M ode 27.99 S td. Deviation 130.03771 Variance 16909.807 Ra nge 447.84 M inimum 27.99 M aximum 475.83 S um 3218.85
Graph 4:12 Case B/ Stage 4
For Case B - Stage 4, the mean time spent on the GWRCS codes observed was 119 seconds, with a st. deviation of 130 seconds, for the 27 sequential
valid N) of three GWRCS codes (Graph 4:12). The total time spent in stage 4 was 3218 seconds.
It can be observed that for Case B
with fair amounts of time spent on both Focussed and out interaction. Also, it is interesting to note that no conflict
in stage 4.
4.1.3.5 Stage 1 - Model Appropriations.
Table 4:13 and Graph 4:13 present the descriptive statistics and the cumulative percentages for the MACS code
156
Case B/ Stage 4 - Cumulative percentages of GWRCS codes.
Stage 4, the mean time spent on the GWRCS codes observed was 119 seconds, with a st. deviation of 130 seconds, for the 27 sequential
valid N) of three GWRCS codes (Graph 4:12). The total time spent in stage 4 was
It can be observed that for Case B - Stage 4 most of the time was spent in Typing with fair amounts of time spent on both Focussed and out-of
interaction. Also, it is interesting to note that no conflict-related codes were observed
Model Appropriations.
Table 4:13 and Graph 4:13 present the descriptive statistics and the cumulative percentages for the MACS codes for Case B - Stage 1 respectively.
Cumulative percentages of GWRCS codes.
Stage 4, the mean time spent on the GWRCS codes observed was 119 seconds, with a st. deviation of 130 seconds, for the 27 sequential instances (i.e. valid N) of three GWRCS codes (Graph 4:12). The total time spent in stage 4 was
Stage 4 most of the time was spent in Typing of-focus (i.e. INT) related codes were observed
Table 4:13 and Graph 4:13 present the descriptive statistics and the cumulative Stage 1 respectively.
Table 4:13 Case B / Stage 1 / MA
Graph 4:13 Case B/ Stage 1
For Case B - Stage 1, the mean time spent on the MACS codes observed was 97 seconds, with a st. deviation of 121 seconds, for the 11 sequential instances (i.e. valid N) of six MACS codes (Graph 4:13). The total time spent in stage 1 was 1052 seconds.
157
Case B / Stage 1 / MACS - Descriptive Statistics.
Case B/ Stage 1 - Cumulative percentages of MA
Stage 1, the mean time spent on the MACS codes observed was 97 seconds, with a st. deviation of 121 seconds, for the 11 sequential instances (i.e. valid N) of six MACS codes (Graph 4:13). The total time spent in stage 1 was 1052
Sta tistics MACS time_seconds N Valid 11 11 Missing 0 0 Mean 95.6027 Std. Error of Mean 36.60090 Median 58.3100 Mode 13 .30 Std. Deviati on 121.39147 Vari ance 14735.889 Range 398 .22 Minimum 9 .97 Maximum 408 .19 Sum 1051 .63 Descriptive Statistics.
Cumulative percentages of MACS codes.
Stage 1, the mean time spent on the MACS codes observed was 97 seconds, with a st. deviation of 121 seconds, for the 11 sequential instances (i.e. valid N) of six MACS codes (Graph 4:13). The total time spent in stage 1 was 1052
158
It can be observed that for Case B - Stage 1 most of the time was spent in Typing and No Model Appropriations, with small amounts of time being spent in Affirmation and Direct periods of interaction.
4.1.3.6 Stage 2 - Model Appropriations.
Table 4:14 and Graph 4:14 present the descriptive statistics and the cumulative percentages for the MACS codes for Case B - Stage 2 respectively.
Table 4:14 Case B / Stage 2 / MACS - Descriptive Statistics.
Statistics MACS time_seconds N Valid 70 70 Missing 0 0 Mean 44.1700 Std. Error of Mean 4.52926 Median 29.9220 Mode 13.30a Std. Deviation 37.89450 Variance 1435.993 Range 182.85 Minimum 9.97 Maximum 192.83 Sum 3091.90
a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown
Graph 4:14 Case B/ Stage 2
For Case B - Stage 2, the mean time spent on the MACS codes observed was 44 seconds, with a st. deviation of 38 seconds, for the 70 sequential instances (i.
N) of eight MACS codes (Graph 4:14). The total time spent in stage 2 was 3092 seconds.
It can be observed that for Case B
Unfocussed and Constraint interaction. Extremely small amounts of time were s in Combination and Negative periods of interaction.
As previously noted, when presenting the GWRCS descriptive statistics for Case B - Stage 2, no time was spent in Typing.
4.1.3.7 Stage 3 - Model Appropriations.
Table 4:15 and Graph 4:15 present the percentages for the MACS codes for Case B
159
Case B/ Stage 2 - Cumulative percentages of MACS codes.
Stage 2, the mean time spent on the MACS codes observed was 44 seconds, with a st. deviation of 38 seconds, for the 70 sequential instances (i.
N) of eight MACS codes (Graph 4:14). The total time spent in stage 2 was 3092
It can be observed that for Case B - Stage 2 most of the time was spent in Direct, Unfocussed and Constraint interaction. Extremely small amounts of time were s in Combination and Negative periods of interaction.
As previously noted, when presenting the GWRCS descriptive statistics for Case Stage 2, no time was spent in Typing.
Model Appropriations.
Table 4:15 and Graph 4:15 present the descriptive statistics and the cumulative percentages for the MACS codes for Case B - Stage 3 respectively.
Cumulative percentages of MACS codes.
Stage 2, the mean time spent on the MACS codes observed was 44 seconds, with a st. deviation of 38 seconds, for the 70 sequential instances (i.e. valid N) of eight MACS codes (Graph 4:14). The total time spent in stage 2 was 3092
Stage 2 most of the time was spent in Direct, Unfocussed and Constraint interaction. Extremely small amounts of time were spent
As previously noted, when presenting the GWRCS descriptive statistics for Case
descriptive statistics and the cumulative Stage 3 respectively.
Table 4:15 Case B / Stage 3
Graph 4:15 Case B/ Stage 3
For Case B - Stage 3, the mean time spent on the MACS codes observed was 59 seconds, with a st. deviation of 43 seconds, for the 24 sequential instances (i.e. valid N) of five MACS codes (Graph 4:15). The total time spent in stage 3 was 1426 seconds.
160
Case B / Stage 3 / MACS - Descriptive Statistics.
Case B/ Stage 3 - Cumulative percentages of MACS codes.
Stage 3, the mean time spent on the MACS codes observed was 59 seconds, with a st. deviation of 43 seconds, for the 24 sequential instances (i.e. valid MACS codes (Graph 4:15). The total time spent in stage 3 was 1426
Sta tistics MACS time_seconds N Valid 24 24 Missing 0 0 Mean 59.4275 Std. Error of Mean 8.69610 Median 53.1940 Mode 13 .30 Std. Deviati on 42.60201 Vari ance 1814.931 Range 152 .93 Minimum 9 .97 Maximum 162 .91 Sum 1426 .26 Descriptive Statistics.
Cumulative percentages of MACS codes.
Stage 3, the mean time spent on the MACS codes observed was 59 seconds, with a st. deviation of 43 seconds, for the 24 sequential instances (i.e. valid MACS codes (Graph 4:15). The total time spent in stage 3 was 1426
161
It can be observed that for Case B - Stage 3 the time was well spread in Constraint, Direct, No Model and Unfocussed interaction with only Affirmation having a lower than 15% value. As previously noted when presenting the GWRCS descriptive statistics for Case B - Stage 3, no time was spent in Typing.
4.1.3.8 Stage 4 - Model Appropriations.
Table 4:16 and Graph 4:16 present the descriptive statistics and the cumulative percentages for the MACS codes for Case B - Stage 4 respectively.
Table 4:16 Case B / Stage 4 / MACS - Descriptive Statistics.
Sta tistics MACS time_seconds N Valid 32 32 Missing 0 0 Mean 87.5063 Std. Error of Mean 22.47404 Median 41.5575 Mode 13 .30 Std. Deviati on 127.13239 Vari ance 16162.645 Range 544 .00 Minimum 9 .97 Maximum 553 .97 Sum 2800 .20
Graph 4:16 Case B/ Stage 4
For Case B - Stage 4, the mean time spent on the MACS codes observed was 87 seconds, with a st. deviation of 127 seconds, for the 32 sequential instances (i.e. valid N) of nine MACS codes (Graph 4:16). The total
seconds.
It can be observed that for Case B
and No Model Appropriation with 11% of the time spent in Constraining the model. The rest 6 MACS codes presented very low duration val
2.14%.