• No results found

Conclusion

In document 5148.pdf (Page 47-58)

This study develops a positive feedback model of media attention to SMOs. This simple model suggests that when SMOs receive some attention, this initial coverage may lead to more. Positive feedback is constituted by three mechanisms: 1) as an organization receives more coverage it is exposed to more journalists, and is constructed as more news-worthy as journalists make sense of their own and others’ past coverage of the organization. 2) When an organization receives coverage it becomes more visible to other actors such as the state and potential supporters, thus potentially becoming more influential and attracting more resources to leverage for future coverage. 3) When an organization’s tactics are successful at attracting media coverage they are more likely to repeat those tactics.

Positive feedback explains why we see such massive inequality and volatility in media attention to SMOs. The model also led to two expectations which were empirically tested.

48

The first was that, like realizations from other positive feedback systems, such as forest-fires, avalanches or city sizes, total media attention would be power-law distributed across SMOs. Second, following historical sociologists and economic historians, I argued that SMO media attention trajectories would be path dependent: contingent on key events early on in historical process which might set SMOs on paths wherein media attention largely reinforced itself.

I tested these expectations using mixed methods and multiple sources of data. First, I used new methodology from statistical physics to show that, across a variety of media sources, media attention to SMOs is characterized by a power-law distribution. Second, I used the comparative case of the Revolutionary Action Movement and the Black Panther Party to show that media attention to SMOs can be contingent on key events and small initial differences in the characteristics of groups. These two groups were initially very similar in terms of media representation and relevant organization characteristics such as resources, framing of their goals, tactics, the political opportunity structure they faced and their relationship with the state. Yet, by the end of the twentieth century the Black Panther Party had received roughly eighty times as many articles in the NYT as RAM had. Through the reconstruction of process, and comparison across these groups, I argued that positive feedback made more sense as an explanation than did exogenous variables.

This argument is not necessarily limited to SMOs. Business firms may also be subject to positive feedback in the media, which they can parlay into dominance of their markets (Rindova, Pollock, and Hayward 2006). The argument and methodology may also be of interest to those studying the popularity of cultural objects which are subject to positive feedback processes (Rossman, Esparza, and Bonacich 2010; Salganik et al. 2006), those studying positive feedback in collective action formally, or through the use of power-laws

49

(Marwell and Oliver 1993; Biggs 2005), and those studying contingent, path dependent histories (Mahoney 2000; Pierson 2000; Sewell 1996).

Despite the model’s fit with the evidence here, a number of qualifications are in order. First, certain types of SMOs (e.g. labor unions) that interact directly with targets will be less dependent on, and thus less affected by, the media. Second, the positive feedback model tells us little about when groups will receive media attention. In part this reflects the inherent unpredictably of positive feedback processes (Salganik et al. 2006), however the question of what ‘sparks’ positive feedback processes should be addressed by future work. Finally, while, positive feedback does not imply that growth continues on forever unboundedly, it does lack an account of how coverage ends.

Despite these limitations, positive feedback within the media is a defining feature of the environment within which SMOs act. The power-law distribution of media coverage generated by these positive feedback dynamics means that most SMOs receive very little attention (Sobieraj 2011), while a few organizations will receive extremely high levels of attention. Positive feedback also means that once set into motion, media waves do not die easily. Finally, positive feedback means that prediction of which SMO will receive how much coverage, and when, will continue to be difficult.

50 References

Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Time matters : on theory and method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,.

Ahmad, Muhammad. 2006. “The Revolutionary Action Movement.” in Black power in the belly of the beast, edited by J. L. (. L. ) Jeffries. Urbana: University of Illinois Retrieved

(http://search.lib.unc.edu.libproxy.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb4959663; Table of contents only (http://www.loc.gov.libproxy.lib.unc.edu/catdir/toc/ecip068/2006003040.html)).

Ahmad, Muhammad. 2007. We will return in the whirlwind : black radical organizations 1960- 1975. 1st ed. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr Pub. Co.,.

Allison, Paul D., J. Scott Long, and Tad K. Krauze. 1982. “Cumulative Advantage and Inequality in Science.” American Sociological Review 47(5):615–625.

Amenta, Edwin, Neal Caren, Sheera Joy Olasky, and James E. Stobaugh. 2009. “All the Movements Fit to Print: Who, What, When, Where, and Why SMO Families Appeared in the New York Times in the Twentieth Century.” American Sociological Review 74(4):636–656. Andrews, Kenneth T., and Michael Biggs. 2006. “The Dynamics of Protest Diffusion: Movement Organizations, Social Networks, and News Media in the 1960 Sit-Ins.” American Sociological Review 71(5):752–777.

Andrews, Kenneth T., and Neal Caren. 2010. “Making the News.” American Sociological Review 75(6):841–866.

Arlen, Michael J. 1973. An American verdict. [1st ed.]. Garden City, N.Y., Doubleday, 1973.: Doubleday,.

Arthur, W. Brian. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events.” The Economic Journal 99(394):116–131. Retrieved April 15, 2011.

Austin, Curtis. 2006. Up against the wall : violence in the making and unmaking of the Black Panther Party. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press Retrieved

(http://search.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb4948068; Table of contents only (http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0619/2006026040.html)).

Bak, P. (Per). 1996. How nature works : the science of self-organized criticality. New York, NY, USA: Copernicus,.

Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo, and Reka Albert. 1999. “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks.” Science 286(5439):509.

Barranco, José, and Dominique Wisler. 1999. “Validity and Systematicity of Newspaper Data in Event Analysis.” European Sociological Review 15(3):301 –322. Retrieved May 17, 2011.

51

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 2009. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Retrieved

(http://search.lib.unc.edu.libproxy.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb5945582).

Bennett, Andrew, and Colin Elman. 2006. “QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods.” Annual Review of Political Science 9(1):455–476. Retrieved June 17, 2011. Beyeler, Michelle, and Hanspeter Kriesi. 2005. “Transnational Protest and the Public Sphere.” Mobilization: An International Journal 10(1):95–109.

Biggs, Michael. 2005. “Strikes as Forest Fires: Chicago and Paris in the Late Nineteenth Century.” American Journal of Sociology 110(6):1684–1714.

Bloom, Joshua, and Waldo Martin. Forthcoming. Black Against Empire: The History and Politics of the Black Panther Party. University of California Press.

Bogart, Leo. 1989. Press and public : who reads what, when, where, and why in American newspapers. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates,.

Boggs, Grace Lee. 1998. Living for change : an autobiography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,.

Brian Arthur, W., Yu.M. Ermoliev, and Yu.M. Kaniovski. 1987. “Path-dependent processes and the emergence of macro-structure.” European Journal of Operational Research 30(3):294–303. Retrieved April 15, 2011.

Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2003. “Modeling the Size of Wars: From Billiard Balls to Sandpiles.” The American political science review 97(01):135.

Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10(1):103–126. Retrieved June 14, 2011.

Clauset, Aaron, Cosma Shalizi, and Mark Newman. 2009. “Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data.” SIAM Review 51(4):661–703.

Clauset, Aaron, Maxwell Young, and Kristian Gleditsch. 2007. “On the Frequency of Severe Terrorist Events.” The Journal of conflict resolution 51(1):58–87.

Cleaver, Kathleen. 1982. “How TV Wrecked the Black Panthers.” Communication Channels. Countryman, Matthew. 2006. Up south : civil rights and Black power in Philadelphia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press Retrieved

(http://search.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb4788583).

Danzger, M. Herbert. 1976. “Reply to Tuchman.” American Sociological Review 41(6):1067– 1071. Retrieved May 23, 2011.

52

Danzger, M. Herbert. 1975. “Validating Conflict Data.” American Sociological Review 40(5):570– 584. Retrieved May 23, 2011.

Davenport, Christian. 2010. Media bias, perspective, and state repression : the Black Panther Party. Cambridge ;New York: Cambridge University Press Retrieved

(http://search.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb6046063).

David, Paul A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” The American Economic Review 75(2):332–337. Retrieved April 14, 2011.

DiPrete, Thomas A., and Gregory M. Eirich. 2006. “Cumulative Advantage As a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments.” Annual Review of Sociology 32:271–297.

Downs, Anthony. 1972. “Up and Down with Ecology–The ‘Issue-Attention Cycle’.” 28:38–50. Drossel, B. B., and S. Schawbl. 1992. “Self-organized critical forest-fire model.” Physical Review Letters 69(11):1629–1632.

Earl, Jennifer, Andrew Martin, John McCarthy, and Sarah A. Soule. 2004. “The Use of Newspaper Data in the Study of Collective Action.” 30:65–80.

Eckstein, H. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” in Handbook of political science, edited by Fred I Greenstein and Nelson W Polsby. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.,. Edwards, George C., and Dan B. Wood. 1999. “Who influences whom? The president, Congress, and the media.” The American political science review 93(2):327–344.

Fishman, Mark. 1978. “Crime Waves as Ideology.” Social Problems 25(5):531–543. Retrieved October 12, 2011.

Forman, James. 1997. The making of Black revolutionaries. Seattle: University of Washington Press Retrieved (http://search.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb4543216).

Freeman, Jo. 1973. “The Origins of the Women’s Liberation Movement.” American Journal of Sociology 78(4):792–811. Retrieved May 26, 2011.

Gabaix, Xavier. 2009. “Power Laws in Economics and Finance.” Annual review of economics 1(1):255–293.

Gabaix, Xavier. 1999. “Zipf’s law for cities: An explanation.” The Quarterly journal of economics 114(3):739–767.

Gabaix, Xavier, Parameswaran Gopikrishnan, Vasiliki Plerou, and H. E. Stanley. 2003. “A theory of power-law distributions in financial market fluctuations.” Nature 423. Retrieved

53

Documents&type=retrieve&tabID=T002&prodId=AONE&docId=A187717597&source=gale&srcp rod=AONE&userGroupName=unc_main&version=1.0).

Galtung, Johan, and Mari Holmboe Ruge. 1965. “The Structure of Foreign News.” Journal of Peace Research 2(1):64–91. Retrieved May 22, 2011.

Gamson, William A. 2004. Protest in Time and Space The Blackwell companion to social movements. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub Retrieved

(http://search.lib.unc.edu.libproxy.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb4434409; Table of contents only (http://www.loc.gov.libproxy.lib.unc.edu/catdir/toc/ecip049/2003020377.html)).

Gamson, William A., and Andre Modigliani. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 95(1):1–37. Gans, Herbert J. 1979. Deciding what’s news : a study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek, and Time / Herbert J. Gans. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press,.

Garcia, Mario R, and Margaret Mary Stark. 1990. Eyes on the news. St. Petersburg, Fla.: Poynter Institute for Media Studies,.

George, Alexander L, and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press,.

Gerlach, Luther P., and Virginia Hine. 1970. People, power, change; movements of social transformation. Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill [1970] Retrieved

(http://search.lib.unc.edu.libproxy.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb1035465).

Gerring, J. 2007. “Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?” Comparative Political Studies 40(3):231–253. Retrieved June 28, 2011.

Gitlin, Todd. 1980. The whole world is watching : mass media in the making & unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press Retrieved

(http://search.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb4284748).

Goldstein, M. L., S. A. Morris, and G. G. Yena. 2004. “Problems with fitting to the power-law distribution.” The European physical journal.B, Condensed matter physics 41(2):255–258. Granger, Clive, and P. Newbold. 1974. “Spurious regressions in econometrics.” Journal of Econometrics 2(2):111–120. Retrieved February 22, 2012.

Haas, Jeffrey. 2010. The assassination of Fred Hampton : how the FBI and the Chicago police murdered a Black Panther. Chicago, Ill.: Chicago Review Press Retrieved

(http://search.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb6033560).

Hilgartner, Stephen, and Charles Bosk. 1988. “The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model.” The American journal of sociology 94(1):53–78.

54

Hill, Lance. 2004. The Deacons for Defense : armed resistance and the civil rights movement. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press Retrieved

(http://search.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb4447944).

Jeffries, Hasan Kwame. 2009. Bloody Lowndes : civil rights and Black power in Alabama’s Black Belt. New York: New York University Press,.

Jones, Bryan D. et al. 2009. “A General Empirical Law of Public Budgets: A Comparative Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 53(4):855–873.

Joseph, Peniel E. 2003. “Dashikis and Democracy: Black Studies, Student Activism, and the Black Power Movement.” The Journal of African American History 88(2):182–203. Retrieved May 15, 2011.

Kelley, Robin D. G. 2002. Freedom dreams : the Black radical imagination. Boston: Beacon Press Retrieved (http://search.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb4161045).

Kellstedt, Paul M. 2000. “Media Framing and the Dynamics of Racial Policy Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 44(2):245–260. Retrieved May 23, 2011.

King, Marissa, and Heather Haveman. 2008. “Antislavery in America: The Press, the Pulpit, and the Rise of Antislavery Societies.” Administrative Science Quarterly 53(3):492–528.

Koopmans, Ruud. 2004. “Movements and Media: Selection Processes and Evolutionary Dynamics in the Public Sphere.” Theory and society 33(3-4):367–391.

Koopmans, Ruud, and Susan Olzak. 2004. “Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right- Wing Violence in Germany.” American Journal of Sociology 110(1):198–230.

Koopmans, Ruud, and Rens Vliegenthart. 2010. “Media Attention as the Outcome of a Diffusion Process—A Theoretical Framework and Cross-National Evidence on Earthquake Coverage.” European Sociological Review. Retrieved April 18, 2011

(http://esr.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2010/06/25/esr.jcq032.abstract).

Lester, Marilyn. 1980. “Generating Newsworthiness: The Interpretive Construction of Public Events.” American Sociological Review 45(6):984–994.

Levi, Margaret. 1997. “A model, a method, and a map: Rational choice in comparative and historical analysis.” in Comparative politics : rationality, culture, and structure, edited by Mark Irving Lichbach and Alan S. Zuckerman. Cambridge, U.K. ;New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press,.

Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Stein Rokkan. 1967. “Cleaveage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” Pp. 1–64 in Party systems and voter alignments: cross- national perspectives. [Contributors: Robert R. Alford and others], edited by Stein Rokkan and Seymour Martin Lipset. New York, Free Press [1967]: Free Press.

55

Lipsky, Michael. 1968. “Protest as a Political Resource.” The American Political Science Review 62(4):1144–1158.

Mahoney, James J. 2000. “Path dependence in historical sociology.” Theory and society 29(4):507–548.

Mandelbrot, Benoit. 2004. The (mis)behavior of markets : a fractal view of risk, ruin, and reward. New York: Basic Books Retrieved (http://search.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb4489793).

Mandelbrot, Benoit. 1983. The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman Retrieved (http://search.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb1892655).

Mandelbrot, Benoit. 1963. “The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices.” The Journal of Business 36(4):394–419. Retrieved June 10, 2011.

Marwell, Gerald, and Pamela Oliver. 1993. The critical mass in collective action : a micro-social theory. Cambridge ;New York: Cambridge University Press,.

McAdam, Doug, and Dieter Rucht. 1993. “The Cross-National Diffusion of Movement Ideas.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 528(, Citizens, Protest, and Democracy):56–74.

McCarthy, John, Clark McPhail, and Jackie Smith. 1996. “Images of Protest: Dimensions of Selection Bias in Media Coverage of Washington Demonstrations, 1982 and 1991.” American Sociological Review 61(3):478–499.

McCarthy, John, Larissa Titarenko, Clark McPhail, Patrick Rafail, and Boguslaw Augustyn. 2008. “Assessing Stability in the Patterns of Selection Bias in Newspaper Coverage of Protest During the Transition from Communism in Belarus*.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 13(2):127–146. Retrieved June 10, 2011.

McCarthy, John, and Mayer N. Zald. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82(6):1212–1241.

McCombs, Maxwell E., and Donald L. Shaw. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2):176. Retrieved June 15, 2011.

Merton, R. K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.” Science 159(3810):56–63. Retrieved June 13, 2011.

Myers, Daniel. 2000. “The Diffusion of Collective Violence: Infectiousness, Susceptibility, and Mass Media Networks.” American Journal of Sociology 106(1):173–208.

Myers, Daniel, and B. S. Caniglia. 2004. “All the Rioting That’s Fit to Print: Selection Effects in National Newspaper Coverage of Civil Disorders, 1968-1969.” American Sociological Review 69(4):519–543. Retrieved May 17, 2011.

56

Nelson, Thomas E., Rosalee A. Clawson, and Zoe M. Oxley. 1997. “Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance.” The American Political Science Review 91(3):567– 583. Retrieved June 14, 2011.

Newman, Mark. 2005. “Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law.” Contemporary physics 46(5):323–351.

Newman, Mark. 1996. “Self-Organized Criticality, Evolution and the Fossil Extinction Record.” Proceedings: Biological Sciences 263(1376):1605–1610. Retrieved April 18, 2011.

Newton, Huey P, and J. Herman Blake. 2009. Revolutionary suicide. New York: Penguin Books,. Ogbar, Jeffrey Ogbonna Green. 2004. Black power : radical politics and African American identity. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press Retrieved

(http://search.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb4549014; Table of contents only (http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0413/2004000433.html)).

Oliver, Pamela, and Gregory Maney. 2000. “Political Processes and Local Newspaper Coverage of Protest Events: From Selection Bias to Triadic Interactions.” American Journal of Sociology 106(2):463–505.

Oliver, Pamela, and Daniel Myers. 1999. “How Events Enter the Public Sphere: Conflict, Location, and Sponsorship in Local Newspaper Coverage of Public Events.” American Journal of Sociology 105(1):38–87.

Ortiz, David G., Daniel Myers, N. Eugene Walls, and Maria-Elena D. Diaz. 2005. “Where Do We Stand with Newspaper Data?” Mobilization: An International Journal 10(3):397–419.

Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics.” The American political science review 94(2):251.

Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in time : history, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press,.

Price, Derek. 1965. “Networks of Scientific Papers.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 149(3683):510–&. Rhodes, Jane. 2007. Framing the Black Panthers : the spectacular rise of a Black power icon. New York: New Press : Distributed by W.W. Norton Retrieved

(http://search.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb5311825; Table of contents only (http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0713/2007010436.html)).

Richardson, L. F. 1948. “Variation of the Frequency of Fatal Quarrels With Magnitude.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 43(244):523.

Rindova, Violina P., Timothy G. Pollock, and Mathew L. A. Hayward. 2006. “Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity.” The Academy of Management review 31(1):50.

57

Rohlinger, Deana A. 2002. “Framing the Abortion Debate: Organizational Resources, Media Strategies, and Movement-Countermovement Dynamics.” The Sociological Quarterly 43(4):479– 507.

Rohlinger, Deana A. 2006. “Friends and Foes: Media; Politics, and Tactics in the Abortion War.” Social problems 53(4):537–561.

Rossman, Gabriel, Nicole Esparza, and Phillip Bonacich. 2010. “I’d Like to Thank the Academy, Team Spillovers, and Network Centrality.” American Sociological Review 75(1):31 –51. Retrieved April 17, 2011.

Ryan, Charlotte. 1991. Prime time activism : media strategies for grassroots organizing. Boston, MA: South End Press Retrieved (http://search.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb2401235).

Salganik, M. J., Duncan Watts, and Dodds. 2006. “Experimental Study of Inequality and

Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market.” Science 311(5762):854–856. Retrieved June 11, 2011.

Seale, Bobby. 1991. Seize the time : the story of the Black Panther party and Huey P. Newton. Baltimore, Md.: Black Classic Press Retrieved (http://search.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb2989493). Sewell, William H. 1996. “Three Temporalities: Toward a Sociology of the Event.” in The historic turn in the human sciences, edited by Terrence J McDonald. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press,.

Sigelman, Lee. 1973. “Reporting the News: An Organizational Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology 79(1):132–151.

Simon, Herbert H. A. 1955. “ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS.” Biometrika 42(3- 4):425–440.

Smith, Jackie, John McCarthy, Clark McPhail, and Boguslaw Augustyn. 2001. “From Protest to Agenda Building: Description Bias in Media Coverage of Protest Events in Washington, D.C.” Social Forces 79(4):1397–1423. Retrieved December 13, 2011.

Snow, David A., Louis A. Zurcher, and Sheldon Ekland Olson. 1980. “Social Networks and Social Movements: A Microstructural Approach to Differential Recruitment.” American Sociological Review 45(5):787–801. Retrieved June 14, 2011.

Snyder, David, and William R. Kelly. 1977. “Conflict Intensity, Media Sensitivity and the Validity of Newspaper Data.” American Sociological Review 42(1):105–123. Retrieved May 22, 2011. Sobieraj, Sarah. 2010. “Reporting Conventions: Journalists, Activists, and the Thorny Struggle for Political Visibility.” Social Problems 57(4):505–528. Retrieved April 17, 2011.

58

Sobieraj, Sarah. 2011. Soundbitten : the perils of media-centered political activism. New York: New York University Press,.

Tarrow, Sidney G. 1998. Power in movement : social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge, U.K. ;New York: Cambridge University Press Retrieved

(http://search.lib.unc.edu?R=UNCb3148570).

Tuchman, Gaye. 1973. “Making News by Doing Work: Routinizing the Unexpected.” American Journal of Sociology 79(1):110–131. Retrieved May 23, 2011.

Tuchman, Gaye. 1976. “The News’ Manufacture of Sociological Data.” American Sociological Review 41(6):1065–1067. Retrieved May 23, 2011.

Vasterman, Peter L.M. 2005. “Media-Hype: Self-Reinforcing News Waves, Journalistic Standards

In document 5148.pdf (Page 47-58)

Related documents