BEHAVIORAL STRATEGIES” AMONG ACADEMIC STUDENTS
Malik Ismail Dhaif Allah Al-Laymoun*
*Ph.D (Research Scholar), Department of Psychology,
Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, INDIA
Emai id: [email protected], [email protected]
ABSTRACT
This study seeks to identify the developing self-responsibility and self-management “Goals implementing positive behavioral strategies” in students because strategies have fundamental plays a vital role in every management. This research study set of behavioral positive strategies was developed for management to use with students who may require academic and/or behavioral support is necessary. The strategies are intended to assist teachers working with students with primary academic deficits and challenging behaviors, modification of learning, how to deal with in a difficult situation, and decision making. For the positive implementation of students with more intensive behaviors, potential intensification strategies also are included in the introduction part. The date was adopted gathered through unstructured interviews and answers were analyzed through SPSS statistical Analytics. Its improvement of self-management condition in the higher level of students, Results indicated has positive improvement significant statistical composite association between dimensions of self-management, management support and self-performance of an individual. Specifically, the research study supports has steadily linked between self-management, self-responsibility, and positive improvement (material and immaterial incentives motivation, and professional development ace variable dimensions of the) and these performance level has been improved positively. However, a positive statistically significant relationship was found between modern behavioral strategies offered by the corporate and self-performance in a different level of positive implementation of an individual.
TRANS Asian Research Journals
http://www.tarj.in REFERENCES:
1. A. Bandura, (2011)."Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective,"Annual review of
psychology, 52, 1-26.
2. Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2007). College learning for the new global
century. Washington DC. Retrieved from
http://www.aacu.org/advocacy/leap/documents/GlobalCentury_final.pdfT. R. Owen, "Self- Directed Learning in Adulthood: A Literature Review," 2002.
3. Burkhardt, G., Monsour, M., Valdez, G., Gunn, C., Dawson, M., Lemke, C., ... Martin, C.
(2003). In Gauge 21st century skills: Literacy in the digital age. Naperville, IL: North Central
Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved from http://pict.sdsu.edu/engauge21st.pdf
4. Douglass, C. & S, R. Morris. (2014)."Student Perspectives on Self-Directed Learning,"Journal
of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,14, 13-25,
5. Cela-Ranilla, J. M., Esteve, V., Marqués L., Gisbert, M., Arias, I., Vaca, B. E., &Samaniego, G.,
N. (2011). SIMUL@: 3D spaces to learn generic skills. A pilot study with education students.
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on e-Learning (ICEL), Kelowna, Canada, 324– 334.
6. D. D. Pratt, (1993)."Andragogy after twenty-five years,"New directions for adult and continuing
education, 93,15-23,
7. DeGijbels, I., Raemdonck, D., Vervecken, & VanHerck, J. (2012). "What keeps low-and high-
qualified workers competitive: Exploring the influence of job characteristics and self-directed
learning orientation on work-related learning," in Learning at the Crossroads of Theory and
Practice, (Eds.) Springer, 53-69.
8. Fransen. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2011). Mediating team effectiveness in the context
of collaborative learning: The importance of team and task awareness. Computers in Human
Behavior, 27, 103-113.
9. OECD. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies (DeSeCo). Executive
summary. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf
10. Ministry of Education of Singapore. (2010). Nurturing our young for the future. Competencies
for the 21st century. Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/committee-of-supply- debate/files/nurturing-our-young.pdf.
11. Candy, P., C. (1991). Self-Direction for Lifelong Learning. A Comprehensive Guide to Theory
and Practice: ERIC.
12. Brookfield, S., D. (1986).Understanding and facilitating adult learning: A comprehensive
analysis of principles and effective practices: McGraw-Hill Education: UK
13. SCANS (1991). What work requires of schools. A scans report for America 2000. The
Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills US Department of Labor. Retrieved from http://wdr.doleta.gov/SCANS/whatwork/whatwork.pdf
14. Song, L., & Hill, J. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online
environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27-42.
15. Simpson, R. D. (2003). A search for the complete education: Balancing the needs for survival
and fulfilment. Innovative Higher Education, 28(2), 91-105.
16. Van Woerkom, M., & Croon, M. (2009). The relationships between team learning activities and
team performance. Personnel Review, 38(5), 560–577.
17. Wilson. J. M., Goodman. P., S. & Cronin. M. A. (2007). Group learning. Academy of
TRANS Asian Research Journals
http://www.tarj.in
18. Zimmerman, B., & Martínez-Pons, M. (1992) Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the
self-regulation of learning. In D. Schunk, J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom
(pp. 185-207). New York: Routledge.
Undertaking by the author
1- The manuscript in its present final shape was studied by each and every author and consented to
it.
2- Conflict of interest: none to declare
3- Funding: none
4- Ethical clearance: not required
TRANS Asian Research Journals http://www.tarj.in
A s i a n J o u r n a l o f
M u l t i d i m e n s i o n a l
R e s e a r c h ( A J M R )
(D o u b l e B l i n d R e f e r e e d & R e v i e w e d I n t e r n a t i o n a l J o u r n a l )UGC APPROVED JOURNAL