Hypothesis Testing and Analysis

Null Hypothesis- H0:There is no significant difference in Organisational Climate of

different categories of colleges.

Alternate Hypothesis-H1:There is a significant difference in OrganisationalClimateof different

categories of colleges.

Table 1.2 F-Tests of OrganisationalClimateScore:

Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F p-value Result Between Groups 2705.313 5 541.063 2.550 0.027 Rejected Within Groups 149802.86 9 706 212.185 Total 152508.18 2 711

JAN-MAR, 2018, VOL-7/37 Page 175 The P value 0.027 in the above table is less than standard value 0.05, which means null hypothesis is rejected and alternative hypothesis is accepted. It means there is significant difference among the mean scores of the different categories of the HEIs with respect to organisationalclimate. In thePOSTHOC Test, Table 1.3 shows there is significant difference in the mean score of aided colleges with linguistic minority colleges and autonomous cum linguistic minority colleges. Even there is significant difference in organisationalclimateof government colleges and linguistic minority colleges. Surprisingly there is no much difference among unaided colleges with the rest and autonomous colleges with others. So little more care is needed to be taken by linguistic minority colleges with respect to its organisationalclimate.

Table 1.3Multiple Comparisons among Different Categories of Colleges for OrganisationalClimate:

(I) College

Category (J) College Category

Mean Difference

(I-J) Std. Error p-value Significance

Aided

Linguistic minority 2.59351* 1.29283 .045 Significant

Unaided .41449 1.59335 .795 Non-significant Linguistic minority and

autonomous 5.49379 * 2.78098 .049 Significant Autonomous -3.08398 4.12104 .454 Non-significant Government -5.36681 3.02464 .076 Non-significant Linguistic minority Aided -2.59351* 1.29283 .045 Significant Unaided -2.17902 1.69946 .200 Non-significant Linguistic minority and

autonomous 2.90029 2.84311 .308 Non-significant Autonomous -5.67748 4.16321 .173 Non-significant Government -7.96031* 3.08185 .010 Significant

Unaided

Aided -.41449 1.59335 .795 Non-significant

Linguistic minority 2.17902 1.69946 .200 Non-significant Linguistic minority and

autonomous 5.07930 2.99175 .090 Non-significant Autonomous -3.49847 4.26611 .412 Non-significant Government -5.78130 3.21950 .073 Non-significant Linguistic minority and autonomous Aided -5.49379* 2.78098 .049 Significant

Linguistic minority -2.90029 2.84311 .308 Non-significant Unaided -5.07930 2.99175 .090 Non-significant Autonomous -8.57777 4.83682 .077 Non-significant Government -10.86060* 3.94465 .006 Significant

JAN-MAR, 2018, VOL-7/37 Page 176

Linguistic minority 5.67748 4.16321 .173 Non-significant Unaided 3.49847 4.26611 .412 Non-significant Linguistic minority and

autonomous 8.57777 4.83682 .077 Non-significant Government -2.28283 4.98090 .647 Non-significant

Government

Aided 5.36681 3.02464 .076 Non-significant

Linguistic minority 7.96031* 3.08185 .010 Significant Unaided 5.78130 3.21950 .073 Non-significant Linguistic minority and

autonomous 10.86060 *

3.94465 .006 Significant

Autonomous 2.28283 4.98090 .647 Non-significant

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

2)Null Hypothesis-There is no significant difference in Organisational Culture of different categories of colleges.

Alternative Hypothesis-There is a significant difference in Organisational Culture of different categories of colleges.

Table 1.4 ANOVA Test for Organisational Culture:

Sum of Squares difference Mean Square F p-value Result Between Groups 3580.180 5 716.036 2.739 .018 Rejected Within Groups 184576.693 706 261.440

Total 188156.873 711

The above table shows P value 0.018 which is less than 0.05, it means null hypothesis is rejected and alternative hypothesis is accepted. There is a significant difference among the different colleges with respect to organisational culture. The POSTHOCtest shows there is significant difference among linguistic minority cum autonomous colleges with the rest of colleges with respect to organisational culture. Its score is not only the least it‘s significantly different than the other colleges. Their management and leaders need to do alter this. Let‘s check organisational leadership variable of these colleges.

3)Null Hypothesis: -There is no significant difference in Leadership mean of different categories of colleges.

Alternative Hypothesis: -There is a significant difference in the Leadership mean of different categories of colleges.

Table 1.5 ANOVA Test for Organisational Leadership Score:

Sum of Squares difference Mean Square F p-value Result Between Groups 5506.758 5 1101.352 3.822 .002 Rejected Within Groups 203451.961 706 288.176

Total 208958.719 711

The above table says P value is 0.002 which is less than the standard value 0.05, which means null hypothesis is rejected and alternative hypothesis is accepted. So there is significant difference among the different categories of colleges with respect to organisational leadership.

JAN-MAR, 2018, VOL-7/37 Page 177

4)Null Hypothesis: There is no significant difference regarding the availability ofICT tools among different categories of colleges.

Alternative Hypothesis: There is a significant difference for the availability ICT tools among different categories of colleges.

Table 1.6 ANOVA Test for Availability of ICT Tools for Different Categories:

The significant value of above test is .000 which is less than the standard P value 0.05, so null hypothesis is rejected and alternative hypothesis is accepted. So it proves there is a significant difference among the different categories of colleges with respect to availability of ICT.ThePOSTHOC test demonstrates that there is significant difference in the availability of ICT amongunaided colleges with the rest. Similarly among autonomous colleges and the rest of colleges there is huge gap. Between linguistic minority colleges and aided colleges also there is significant difference. Let‘s test another hypothesis.

5)Null Hypothesis: There is no significant difference among the different categories of colleges with respect to Usage of ICT.

Alternative Hypothesis: There is a significant difference among the different categories of colleges with respect to Usage of ICT.

Table 1.7 Usage of ICT According to Categories of Colleges:

Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig. Result Between Groups 2598.889 5 519.778 5.180 .000 Rejected Within Groups 70846.667 706 100.349

Total 73445.555 711

The above table illustrates significant value .000 which is lower than the standard P value 0.05, so null hypothesis is rejected and alternative hypothesis is selected. So it means there is a significant difference among the different categories with respect to Usage of ICT.

The POSTHOCtest shows us that there is significant difference among unaided colleges and aided, linguistic minority, autonomous, linguistic minority with autonomous colleges with respect of usage of ICT. There is significant difference between aided and linguistic minority colleges as well. While analysis the data further following outcomes were obtained:

 Out of 38 aided colleges, only 14 colleges have above average score for availability of ICT tools, 19 colleges for usage of ICT and 24 colleges for organisational environment and 22 colleges have above average score for organisational culture, 17 colleges for organisational leadership and 13 colleges for organisational technology.

 Out of 13 unaided colleges, three unaided colleges have zero score for availability of ICT and its usage. Gurukul College has the highest score for availability of ICT, organisational environment, culture, leadership and technology.

 Out of 16 Aided cum Linguistic Minority colleges, half of the colleges have above average score for availability of ICT, 5 colleges for usage of ICT and 8 colleges for organisationalclimate. 8 colleges have above average score for organisational culture, 9

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Result Between Groups 5717.233 5 1143.447 13.244 .000 Rejected Within Groups 60953.553 706 86.336

JAN-MAR, 2018, VOL-7/37 Page 178 colleges for organisational leadership and 11 colleges for technology score. ManibenNanavati college of VileParle has highest score for organisational culture and leadership. G. N. Khalsa College, Matunga has highest score for organizational technology. Burhani College of Commerce & Arts, Mazgaon has the lowest score for all the three variables.

 AakbarPeerbhoy College has better score than other government colleges for availability of ICT whereas Sydenham College has better for usage of ICT and organisational climate. Ismail Yusuf College has highest score for organisational culture and technology where as Sydenham College has superior score for organisational leadership.

 St. Xaviers College has outstanding score for availability of ICT and its usage among autonomous colleges. NagindasKhandwala College has better score for organisational Climate. NagindasKhandwala College; Malad has the highest score for all the three variables, i.e. Organisationalculture, leadership and technology.

1.7 Conclusion: Following table 1.8 reveals Autonomous Colleges have uppermost score for