which I call the ethnic dilemma, is basically a contradiction between the
I the implementation of the Galbally Report, for, like many involved with
this area, most of them see multiculturalism as replacing the assimilationist
policies of the 1950s and 1960s. But the ideas underlying these concepts are
not necessarily mutually exclusive: multiculturalism unintentionally can be
and often is a new concept for an old idea. Holistic multiculturalism, primarily concerned with cultural diversity (cf. the Galbally Report) will not change the Anglo-Australian dominant opportunity structure.
CONCLUSION
Australian ethnic relations represent the outcome of various social structures and processes. These social forces include the class structure and the Anglo-Australian economic, political, social and legal domination as well as the previous hegemonic consequences which result from such a structure. The control of economic and political power carries with it the right to define the location and social perception of other categories
156
which are economically and politically subordinate. A review of the
history of ethnic relations in this country has shown how some of these
forces have developed and interacted to produce the ethnic effect in 1980.
This effect can be summarised in diagramatic form as follows:
FIGURE 5.3 THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE ETHNIC EFFECT OF AUSTRALIAN
ETHNIC RELATIONS
_______________________ Period__________________
Definition of migrants 1800 1850 1900 1950 1960 1970
Sources of cheap labour _______________________________________________
Competitors for jobs _______________________________
Racism/inferiority- superiority _______________________________ White Australia _______________________________ 'Populate or perish' _____ Assimilate! ______________ Social problems ____________ Disadvantaged minorities _____________ Multiculturalism Ethnic rights
There are a number of aspects of this historical development which can
be pointed out. Firstly, various definitions of migrants arc not
necessarily mutually exclusive, but can co-exist, e.g., compel i I or:; for
jobs - racism. Secondly, certain definitions tend to co-exist as 'natural'
couplings, e.g., competition for jobs - racism; white Australia - populate;
disadvantaged minorities - social problems; assimilation - integration/
natural because they are consistent with the problematic in which they are
located. Elaboration of the logic and content of some of these
problematics appeared earlier, e.g., assimilation-integration in the
discussion of Robert Park's work. Thirdly, these definitions and couplings
often contain internal contradictions which only appear under rigorous
systematic scrutiny. It is precisely because of the lack of such scrutiny
that these definitions are able to be perpetuated by the ruling class.
But this brief overview of some of the major social, economic and polit.i cal
forces which have given rise to the ethnic effect in Australian society,
tells only a small part of the story. For a more extensive picture of a
sociology of Australian ethnic relations, much more information is required
Such information would include analysis of the location of ethnic groups in
the social system and greater consideration of the structural component of
Australian ethnic relations. In short, a more detailed analysis of ethnic
158
FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER FIVE
1 This brief outline of the beginnings of Australian capitalism is
intended to simply provide the foundation for an analysis of the develox^ment of the ethnic effect and the location of migrants in the Australian social system. For a detailed study of these aspects and an extension of the analysis into later periods of Australian history see Wild (1978); Ward (1969); Wheelwright and Buckley (1975, 1978a, 1978b); Connell(1977); McQueen (1977); Clark (1963).
2 For instance one political cartoon which appeared in The Worker in
1892 showed a Chinese man panning for gold with Kanaka labourers
cutting cane in the background and an Australian pondering a sign which says: 'Wanted: Shearers and Station Hands. No White Man Need Apply'
(Markus, 1979:26). For an excellent collection of these 'powerful' cartoons on racial and ethnic relations of this period, see Markus, 1979.
3 The term 'White Australia' has never appeared in any Federal or State
legislation (Australia, 1973).
4 'Stamping' referred to marking the furniture with the name and
nationality of the manufacturer. Markus says that this practice:
Would not only allow peox>le 'to support their own brethren', but would also be a device to raise standards by establishing a name for the better manufacturers (Markus, 1979:165).
5 See Markus again, Fear and Hatred, for examples of some of the vivid political cartoons on this theme which appeared in the x^ess at the time. The cover of this text shows a cartoon, which is taken from The Worker, of an Asian creex^ing through a bedroom window, huge knife in hand, and a young fair-haired girl peacefully asleex) in the
foreground.
6 Clark suggests that members of the Nationalist Party were embarrassed
by the enthusiasm Hughes applied to the ideal of White Australia (Clark, 1963:200).
CHAPTER SIX
ETHNIC GROUPS AND THE CLASS STRUCTURE
ETHNICITY, RACE AND CLASS
One aim of this work, given the epistemological position developed in Part I, is to consider possible strategies for altering the position of disadvantaged migrants in the social system. This aim requires firstly, an elaboration of the major social structures and processes in the social system and the implications they have for maintaining the j^osition of migrants in such a system. Secondly, consideration of how these processes and structures may possibly be applied to alter the location of migrants in the social system. These concerns are the focus of this chapter.
There are some important implications for the analysis of ethnic
I