4. Discussion
4.2 Implications
This study aimed to explore whether a future self-dialogue exercise in VR or EC can increase FSCon, FSViv, and FSVal and whether one intervention worked better than the other and why. Findings revealed that both interventions do not significantly increase FSCon, FSViv, and FSVal, which is why it cannot be reliably stated that the manipulation worked. It is relevant to note, however, that despite this non-significance there was a tendency observed that in VR the increase was the greatest in all future self measures and in both experiments it was greater than in the control. Instead of discarding the idea that both interventions could have any practical value due to the non-significant effects, this trend effect suggests that they might have potential. Especially with regard to an almost significant difference observed between VR and the control condition in the increase in FSVal. Researchers can build on this knowledge and focus on improving the research design by adding more cues and embellishment that will further increase the embodiment illusion of a future self in VR, and investigate whether this as well as increasing the sample size changes the intervention’s outcome. Furthermore, as results indicated that the embodiment of the future self did not
significantly predict the increase in the future self measures, it directs future research to look into other factors that could possibly have influenced the tendency observed, such as the ability for imagination.
Concluding, this study directs future research in that it gave important insights into whether a future self-dialogue exercise in EC and VR can be used in order to increase FSCon, FSViv, and FSVal. Although there was no support found, in terms of significance, the results were pointing into the intended direction. A future self-dialogue exercise in EC and VR tended to increase FSCon, FSViv, and FSVal more compared to the absence of such exercise, and the greatest increase was observed in VR. Knowing this gives hope that there is potential for improvement. Not every intervention works for every person, but the trend effect revealed that it did work for some while not for others. Hence, although the added value of VR is not yet entirely clear, this research can serve as a guide on where to improve future interventions aimed at increasing connectedness to a future self and therefore to foster long-term oriented thinking and behavior among individuals.
References
Adelman, R. M., Herrmann, S. D., Bodford, J. E., Barbour, J. E., Graudejus, O., Okun, M. A., & Kwan, V. S. Y. (2017). Feeling Closer to the Future Self and Doing Better :
Temporal Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Academic Performance. Journal of Personality, 85(3), 398-408 (June). doi:10.1111/jopy.12248
AmberScript B.V. (2019). AmberScript [Computer Software]. Retrieved on March 12, 2019, from https://www.amberscript.com/en/about-us.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of the other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612. Retrieved on April 7, 2019, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.63.4.596.
Audacity Team (2019). Audacity(R): Free Audio Editor and Recorder (Version 2.3.1) [Computer application]. Retrieved from https://audacityteam.org/ [1].”
Banakou, D., Kishore, S., & Slater, M. (2018). Virtually Being Einstein Results in an
Improvement in Cognitive Task Performance and a Decrease in Age Bias. Frontier in Psychology, 9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00917
Banakou, D., Slater, M. (2014). Body ownership causes illusory self-attribution of speaking and influences subsequent real speaking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 111(49), 17678-17683. doi:10.1073/pnas.1414936111
Bartels, D. M., & Rips, L. J. (2010). Psychological connectedness and intertemporal choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,139(1), 49-69.
doi:10.1037/a0018062
Bartels, D. M., & Urminsky, O. (2011). On Intertemporal Selfishness: How the Perceived Instability of Identity Underlies Impatient Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 182-198. doi:10.1086/ 658339
Blouin-Hudon, E. C., & Pychyl, T. A. (2015). Experiencing the temporally extended self: Initial support for the role of affective states, vivid mental imagery, and future self- continuity in the prediction of academic procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 50-56.
Chen, F. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Repulsion or Attraction? Group Membership and Assumed Attitude Similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83(1), 111-125. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.111
abilities through conversation about the extended self. Developmental Psychology, 53(4), 652-661.
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The Relation of Empathy to Prosocial and Related Behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91-119.
Ersner-Hershfield, H., Garton, M. T., Ballard, K., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., & Knutson, B. (2009b). Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self- continuity account for saving. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(4), 280-286. Ersner-Hershfield, H. E., Wimmer, G. E., & Knutson, B. (2009a). Saving for the future self:
Neural measures of future self-continuity predict temporal discounting. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 85-92. doi:10.1093/scan/nsn042
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The Relation of Empathy to Prosocial and Related Behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91-119.
Fry, B, & Reas, C (2004). Processing [Computer software]. Retrieved on March 15, 2019, from https://processing.org/copyright.html
Greenberg, L. S., & Malcom, W. (2002). Resolving Unfinished Business: Relating Process to Outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(2), 406-416.
doi:10.1037//0022-006X.70.2.416
Hershfield, H. E. (2018). The self over time. Current Opinion in Psychology, 26, 72-75. Retrieved on March 1, 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.06.004. Hershfield, H. E. (2011). Future self-continuity: How conceptions of the future self transform
intertemporal choice. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235, 30-43. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06201.x
Hershfield, H. E., Cohen, T. R., & Thompson, L. (2012). Short horizons and tempting situations: Lack of continuity to our future selves leads to unethical decision making and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(2), 298- 310. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.002
Hershfield, H. E., Goldstein, D. G., Sharpe, W. F., Fox, J., Yeykelis, L., Carstensen, L. L, & Bailenson, J. N. (2011). Increasing saving behavior through age-progressed renderings of the future self. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, S23-S37.
doi:10.1509/jmkr.48.SPL.S23.
Hershfield, H. E., John, E. M., & Reiff, J. S. (2018). Using Vividness Interventions to Improve Financial Decision Making. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2), 209-215. doi:10.1177/2372732218787536
in formal relationships between mentors and protégés. Journal of Vocational Behavior,67, 252-265. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.012
Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 272-292.
Neill, J. (2008). Writing Up A factor Analysis. Retrieved on May 19, 2019 from https://www.academia.edu/2831918/Writing_up_a_factor_analysis.
Osimo, S. A., Pizarro, R., Spanlang, B., & Slater, M. (2015). Conversations between self and self as Sigmund Freud - A virtual body ownership paradigm for self counselling. Scientific Reports, 5. doi:10.1038/srep13899
Paivio, S. C., & Greenberg, L. (1995). Resolving “unfinished business”: Efficacy of
experiential therapy using empty-chair dialogue. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 419–425.
Parthasarathi, T., McConnell, M. H., Luery, J., & Kable, J. W. (2017). The Vivid Present: Visualization Abilities Are Associated with Steep Discounting of Future Rewards. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00289
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922-934. doi:10.1002/ejsp.504
Pronin, E., & Ross, L. (2006). Temporal differences in trait self-ascription: When the self is seen as an other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 197-209. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.197
Quartz, D. (n.d.). Minim [Computer software]. Retrieved on March 15, 2019, from http://code.compartmental.net/tools/minim/.
Rutchick, A. M., Slepian, M. L., Reyes, M. O., Pleskus, L. N., & Hershfield, H. E. (2018). Future Self-Continuity Is Associated With Improved Health and Increases Exercise Behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(1), 72-80.
Slater, M., Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2014). Transcending the Self in Immersive Virtual Reality. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 47 (7). doi:10.1109/MC.2014.198 Van Gelder, J.-L., Hershfield, H. E., & Nordgren, L. (2013). Vividness of the future self
reduces delinquency. Psychological Science, 24(6), 974-980. doi:10.1177/0956797612465197
Van Gelder, J.-L., Luciano, E. C., Kranenbarg, M. W., & Hershfield, H. E., (2015). Friends with my future self: Longitudinal intervention reduces delinquency. Criminology, 53(2), 158-179. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12064
Yong, A. G., Pearce, S. (2013). A Beginner’s Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9 (20(2), 79-94. doi:10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079
Appendix A
Four Tutorial Questions and Nine Experiment Questions Used in the Future Self Dialogue Exercise in the EC and VR Condition
Tutorial Experiment
Future self, what did you have for breakfast?
Future self, do you eat that everyday?
Future self, where are you going on vacation this year?
Future self, how much will this vacation cost?
Future self, how are you feeling today?
Future self, what are you celebrating? Who is coming? What are you guys going to do?
What does it feel like to finally achieve this?
Future self, what did you do or change in the last years that helped you achieve this?
What were some difficult experiences you overcame and how did you deal with them?
What one lesson did you learn from these experiences?
Future self, what advice would you give me to start working towards this goal?
Future self, what are the best parts about being you?
Think of a question you would like to ask your future self and ask it. Start the question with: Future self…
Appendix B
Correlation Matrix for the Items of the Embodiment of the Future Self Scale, FSCon Scale,
and FSViv Scale
Item
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8
When sitting in the chair of my future self, I felt as if I was my future self. (Q1)
1 .54 .29 .24
When sitting in the chair of my future self, my thoughts changed from how I
normally think. (Q2)
.54 1 .31 .15
When sitting in the chair of my future self, I felt as if I was someone else. (Q3)a
.29 .31 1 .12
I felt as if someone was sitting across from me. (Q4)a
.24 .15 .12 1
How connected do you feel to yourself 10 years into the future? (Q5)
1 .28
How similar do you feel to yourself 10 years into the future? (Q6)a
.28 1
I find it easy to imagine myself 10 years from now. (Q7)
1 .79
I find it easy to describe myself 10 years from now. (Q8)
.79 1