3.6 Part Three: Interviews with therapists and qualitative analysis
4) The IPA analysis
As discussed in Section 3.2 Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
(IPA) was the method chosen to analyse the contents of the completed transcripts.
In accordance with this method the transcripts were read and re-read again and
again. Interesting or significant things that the interviewee said the emerging theme
titles were annotated on the left-hand margin. The skill required here was to find
sufficiently high level expressions that would make theoretical connections within
and across cases but which were still firmly implanted in the characteristic of the
particular thing said. It was essential in the first phase of the analysis to read the
transcript closely again and again to become thoroughly acquainted with the
content as it was shared. New insights could be gleaned every time it was read.
There were neither rules nor requirements about what was commented upon, about
the text being divided into meaning units or about a comment being given for each
unit. This means that the research scheme is flexible so that it can shift and change
as new insights develop. The comments consisted of efforts to summarise or
paraphrase associations or connections that came to mind, together with
preliminary interpretations.
Since similar themes came up when I went over the transcripts in the
second phase, involving the focusing-oriented therapists, the same theme titles
were repeated. I searched for connections between the emerging themes l had listed
on a sheet of paper. At this stage, the complete transcript was left intact and
particular passages were neither omitted nor selected for special attention. The
number of emerging themes portrayed the richness of the particular text. I looked
for the next stage is a theoretical ordering to connect the emergent themes in a
coherent way. The last stage dealt with moving from the final themes to writing up
and to making a final statement portraying the meanings encapsulated in the
interviewees’ experiences. I was careful at this point to avoid confusion between the respondent’s input and my own interpretation or account of it. This stage was concerned with translating the themes into a narrative account that detailed the
interesting and essential things about the participants’ responses and the interpretative analysis of them. These themes were illustrated, given a nuance and
explained.
Chapters 5 and 8 of the thesis consist of the analysis of this data. These two chapters are concerned with couple therapy and focusing-oriented therapy
respectively. The data therein have been presented in a way that ensures the voices
3.7 Ethical issues
Ethical research practice is a dynamic process which needs to be
monitored during data collection and analysis. Ethical considerations require that
no harm be done to the researcher or to the participants, that the participants are
well informed and that they voluntarily and willingly consent to the research. In
qualitative research in general, informed consent must be gained not only for
participation in data collection, but also for the likely outcomes of data analysis,
and particularly, the inclusion of verbatim extracts in published documents. While
people’s informed consent may allow access to private information and private settings, it is an ethical responsibility to ensure that this information is never used
in any way other than originally intended or in any way that would infringe on their
right to privacy.
Rights to privacy can be protected by anonymity and
confidentiality. Anonymity is achieved if there is nothing reported in the research
findings that would allow a participant to be identified. Therefore, I did not write
the names of the participants and I also wrote in such a way that the identity of the
participants cannot be detected. I honour confidentiality when I use the information
responsibly and I do not share information about the participant in ways that could
prejudice their interests, and specifically that I do not share information that
someone asks to be removed from the data. Both anonymity and confidentiality
deal with the real threat posed by giving information for one purpose if there is any
chance that it might be used for another purpose that could be harmful to the
participants. Without anonymity and confidentiality, the research participants might
Participants were made aware of BACP Ethical Guidelines for Research
in Counselling and Psychotherapy (Bond, 2004), which was followed throughout.
For ethical responsibility, informed consent was obtained for the usage of data.
Participants were briefed on the reasons for the research, the possibility of it being
published and the fact that pseudonyms were used to protect their anonymity as far
as possible. The names of places, countries and institutions were altered to
safeguard participants’ privacy.
Prior to the interviews with couple therapists and focusing-oriented
therapists, each participant received a letter or an email to obtain informed consent
(Appendix 1). Confidentiality was taken into account, especially in potential
situations where a commitment to confidentiality may be in conflict with other
ethical considerations. The responsibility of each participant to censor their
disclosures, along with the fact that they were free to withdraw at any time, were
clearly stated.
As detailed in Section 3.5, a total of 13 students gave their permission for
me to record their focusing sessions. In order to obtain permission, the written
permission ‘participation release agreement in the diploma course in focusing- oriented and experiential psychotherapy’ (Appendix 7) was given to the
participants, who in turn signed up if they were willing to have their focusing
session recorded. The written permission of the course director and co-director
(Appendix 8) were given and they signed it to permit any recordings of the