Number of Submission: 28 Number of Questions: 12
Q1. I consider that allowing conversion to and from the CP standard is vital for any system that uses tests, quizzes and questionnaires.
A. Both ways (to and from) is important. (18 Response)
B. One way (from any system to CP – e.g., MOT to CP) is important. (9 Responses)
C. One way (to any system from CP– e.g., CP to MOT) is important. (1 Response)
D. It is not important. (0 Response) Q2. I learned to use the converter very quickly
A. Yes. (28 Responses) B. No (0 Response)
Q3. After learning to use it, I believe the converter is easy to use. A. Yes (28 Responses)
B. No (0 Response) Q4. The converter is
A. Slow (6 Responses) B. Fast (22 Responses)
Q5. The conversion took the following number of seconds: Answers: 5
15, 8, 1, 7, 11, 6, 7, 5, 7, 10, 2, 5, 2, 2, 5, 5, 5, 3, 6, 1, 5, 6, 3, 2, 5, 5, 9. Q6. The converted CP file matches exactly the imported CAF file
A. Yes (19 Responses) B. No (9 Responses)
Q7. Does the conversion cover ALL the necessary information? A. Yes (25 Responses)
B. No (3 Responses)
Q8. Should the converter run within MOT rather than as a separate application? A. Yes (10 Responses)
B. No (18 Responses)
Q9. Should the converter run within Sakai rather than as a separate application? A. Yes (10 Responses)
B. No (18 Responses)
Q10. Does the CAF to CP converter need to convert the adaptation parameters (weight, labels) in the Goal Model?
A. Yes (15 Responses) B. No (12 Responses)
Q11. Overall, how do you evaluate this converter? Explain your answer by mentioning the advantages and disadvantages:
Answers:
CP is a standard for uploading data of e-learning systems so the main advantege is that it can transfer any knind of data(docs quizzes pictures questionnares)Compared to CAF this is slower but it is logic because it converta a grea amount of data.
---
a) very quickly;(about 8 seconds) very easy to use; every text such as test,quizzes or just plain text can be converted to a standard that can be used by other programs; b) no disadvantages from my point of view;
--- Advantages:
- the converter is very good because it interprets local data in a format that is widely recongnized in e-learning systems and interoperability is a key issue in this field
process...of course i haven't witnessed this but it is a possbility given the environment it has to work with
--- Advantages: - easy to use; -fast;
disadvantages:
-i don't see any disadvantages in the actual converter; ---
One big advantage is that it converts various types of data ---
It's easy to use. I only needed about 3 clicks to get the results file. It's fast: only took about a second to process the file.
---
It is a very useful tool because you convert the MOT quizzes into CP, that can have any content.
The disadvantage is that it is slow and you have to wait a lot to convert the file. ---
it is great that it also deals with pictures and movies, this is a great advantage ---
It is better than MOT-QTI because of its complexity and functionality; the drawback is the larger time it takes to compile
---
The converter is a very useful tool for performing these tasks. --- Adavantages: 1.easy to use 2. very fast 3.very flexible Disadvantages
1. I needs constant optimization in order to be up to the users' demands which are permanently changing
---
works fast and easy to understand and pluged in converter which is huge advantage.
--- Disadvantages:
- it seems to be slow, but maybe it is the fastest way it can be. Advantages:
- It converts to CP which makes it be used from many other systems. ---
The convertor is very usefull. The advantages are that the converion is very good, it converts all the useful data. It is user friendly.
The converions takes more time and the import is more difficult. ---
As an advantage i would mention that the convertor is fast. The file was rather big but the result was obtained almost immediately.
Because Cp is a more general standard than QTI, it is very usefull to have a good and correct convertor to Cp.This convertor correctly converts all the usefull information.
The only disadvantage that i can observe is its impossibilty to be used offline. ---
It is a very useful converter. Advantages:quick and easy to use. ---
Very good : because it if fast, easy to use and precise (no information is lost - I GUESS)
---
A very easy to use, fast converter. ---
As advantage I would mention its user friendly interface and its logical menu , witch makes it very easy to understand by students , and that it converts the xml files perfectly.
As for disadvantages , it takes more time to convert than CAF to QTI . ---
Advantages:
- Easy to use (click and wait) - Java-based
Disadvantages: - Slow like hell
- Firefox needed (I love IE, sorry) - Account needed
- Internet required (I wonder that all the world is cover with Internet connection)
---
a) Usefull both in practical and learning purpose. b) It should not depend on oher online applications. ---
advantages: it is easy to use, it makes the conversion quite quickly
disadvantages: if the server is not powerful enough or the files are very large, it can be slow
---
It is a good converter since it ensures conversion in quite a short interval of time. Also it gives the information in a different matter, it changes only the structure, not also the content. One isadvantage might be the fact that we could only use it with a version of mozilla firefox and not with internet explorer.
--- Advantages
-Java-based - portability -fast execution time Disadvantages -Hard to find
-not enough user help information ---
It was fast enough when I tested. It seems flexible enough. ---
a)Advantages: fast, easy to use
b)Disadvantages: i found no faults while using the converter ---
Advantages:
- Java-based - portability - Simple to use
- Doesn't require user to know the detailed file structure of the file he is converting, just the content he has packed.
Disadvantages:
- Java-based - slow execution time - A registration is needed to access it ---
Advantages:
1) the converter is fast because it uses Java Architecture for XML Binding.
2) it has a friendly user interface 3) interoperability concept
Q2.12. Which converter is more appropriate? (I.e., which converter makes more sense if we want to export MOT contents in standard format?)
A. CAF to CP (24 Response) B. CAF to QTI (3 Response)