• No results found

The prospect of integrating pedagogical and philosophical research in the area of coaching education offers several avenues for further research. One immediate project for future research involves exploring how the multi-sport Make Ethical Decisions workshop is run and how the participants internalize their experiences as a result of participating in the specialized workshop versus a sport-specific coaching certification program. As indicated earlier, there are different streams for coaching certification in Canada, each corresponding to the level of athlete a coach will be working with. Competition-introduction is geared mainly towards high school aged athletes, while the competition development and competition high- performance streams are geared towards university and national caliber athletes, respectively. As these modules become available, future research could look at how ethics-education is delivered to participants who will be coaching at a higher level in rowing and other sports. The goal of these potential future studies would be much the same as the goal in the final chapter of this dissertation: to plant the seed for a process in coaching-education that promotes the rational improvement of coaches’ individual and collective abilities to asses evidence and arrive at a reasoned ethical judgment when they are faced with conflicting sets of ethical demands, or in the absence of clearly applicable principles and rules.

The opportunity also exists to explore a topic more firmly situated in philosophical discourse. The kinds of practices that ethics education teaches us to admire or abhor in sport are the products of a particular view about the normative function of sport in our society. In sport philosophy literature, there has been a fair amount effort put into developing various competing normative accounts of sport. In particular, the non-formal reason may help solve a sticking point in the conventionalist account of sport advocated by sport philosopher William Morgan (2012), among others. This account situates sport as the product of a specific

cultural-historical context. As such the practices and moral considerations that allow for rational debate in such a setting are dependent upon some shared conventions, otherwise, on this account rational adjudication of competing values in sport will be impossible if the same standards are not shared. On such an account, pragmatic or novel solutions are the result of foregoing a rational resolution and trying to move forward by other means (Morgan, 2012). If we view rationality in the narrow sense of testing arguments and premises against one

another, then it is easy to see why Morgan might believe that creative and pragmatic solutions lie outside the pale of rationality. However, if one adopts Hooker’s view that creative construction is actually one tool among many in a rational process, then creatively constructing pragmatic solutions to bridge the gap between conflicting normative

conceptions of sport no longer has to be non-rational. Scott Kretchmar (2013), a sport philosopher at Penn State, suggested in a recent conference presentation that we might consider whether there are in fact multiple sources of meaning and value that might

legitimately have a place in our normative conception of sport. It is my hope that non-formal reason might contribute fruitfully to this ongoing debate within sport philosophy.

Bibliography

Applied Ethics. (n.d.). In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online. Retrieved from

http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/L005?ssid=205950862&n=2#

Aristotle (1941). Nicomachean ethics. In McKeaon (Ed.). The basic works of Aristotle. New York: Random House.

Bacon, F. (1627). New atlantis. In Weinberger, J. (Ed.). New atlantis and the great insaturation.Arlington Heights, Il: Harlan Davison, Inc.

Bergmann Drew, S. (2002). The Coach-athlete relationship: How close is too close? Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 29 (2), 174-181.

Boxill, J. (2013). The coach as the moral exemplar. In Simon, R. (Ed). The ethics of coaching sports: Moral, social, and legal issues (pp. 9-17). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Brown, H. (1988) Rationality. New York, NY: Routledge.

Burrell, D. & Hauerwas, S. (1977). From system to story: An alternative pattern for rationality in ethics. In Englehardt & Callahan (Eds.) Knowledge, value and belief. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Constitution Act (1982). Retrieved from

Justice Laws website: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-15.html

Cassidy, T., Jones, R., Potrac, P. (2004). Understanding sports coaching: The social, cultural and pedagogical founations of coaching practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY:

Routledge.

Character Development in Action, K-12: Successful Practices in Ontario Schools. Retrieved from Government of Ontario website:

Chase, S.E. (2005). Narrative inquiry: multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In Denzin, N.K., & Yvonna, L.S. (Eds.). The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd. ed.), 651-679. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Ltd.

Child and Family Services Act, Revised Statues of Ontario (1990, C-11). In Allison, J. (Ed.) Legal digest for Ontario educators 2011-2012 (pp. 215-226). London, ON: The Althouse Press.

Coaches of Canada (nd). Coaching code of ethics, principles and ethical standards. Retrieved from http://www.coachesofcanada.com

Creswell, J.C. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Ltd.

Curzon-Hobson, A., Thomson, R.W., & Turner, N. (2003). Coaching a critical stance. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport30 (1), 68-82.

D’Agostino, F. (1981). The ethos of games. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 8 (1), 7-18. Davis, P. (2011). Objectivity and subjectivity in coaching. In Hardman, A. & Jones, C.

(Eds.). The ethics of sports coaching (pp. 56-71). New York, NY: Routledge. Dieffenbach, K., Lauer, L., Johnson, D. (2010). One step at a time: building coach ethics

from the ground up. Journal of Coaching Education, 3(2), 84-105.

Dreyfus, H. L. &Dreyfus, S.E. (1992). What is moral maturity? Towards a phenomenology of ethical expertise. In Oglivy, J. (Ed.) (1991). Revisioning philosophy; State

University of New York Press, 111-131.

The Education Act: Ontario Regulation 99/02, Revised Statues of Ontario (1990). Teacher Performance Appraisal. In Allison, D. (Ed.) Legal digest for Ontario educators 2011- 2012 (pp. 156-161). London, ON: The Althouse Press.

Equity and Inclusive Education: Ontario Program and Policy Memorandum (2009). In Allison, D. (Ed.) Legal digest for Ontario educators 2011-2012 (pp. 319-324). London, ON: The Althouse Press.

ESPN (2012). Board explains firing of Joe Paterno. Retrieved from

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/7675730/penn-state-nittany-lions- trustees-cite-failure-leadership-joe-paterno-firing

Hamilton, M. (2013). Coaching, gamesmanship, and intimidation. In Simon, R. (Ed.) The ethics of coaching sports: Moral, social, and legal issues (pp. 137-149). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Hoffmaster, B. (2012). The rationality of judging and judges. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/barryhoffmaster/40

Hoffmaster, B. (2011). The rationality and morality of dying children. Hastings center report 41(6), 30-42.

Hoffmaster, B. & Hooker, C. (2009). How Experience Confronts Ethics. Bioethics, 23, 214-225.

Hooker, C. A., (2010). Rationality as effective organisation of interaction: Towards a new naturalist foundation for rationality. Axiomathes, 21, 99-172.

Human Rights Code, Revised Statues of Ontario (1990, c. C-33). In Alison, D. (Ed.) Legal digest for Ontario educators 2011-2012 (pp. 226-233). London, ON: The Althouse Press.

Klein, Gary (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kretchmar, S. (2013). Bench players: Do coaches have a moral obligation to play

benchwarmers? In Simon, R. (Ed.) The ethics of coaching sports: Moral, social, and legal issues (pp. 121-136). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Kretchmar, S. (2013, September). Rethinking formalism, interpretivism, and

conventionalsim. Paper presented at the 41st Annual International Association for the Philosophy of Sport Conference, Fullerton, California, United States. Retrieved from

Leduc, M., Culver, D.M., & Werthner, P. (2012). Following a coach education programme: coaches’ perceptions and reported actions. Sports Coaching Rreview 1(2), 135-150. Loland, S. (2011). The normative aims of coaching: The good coach as an enlightened

generalist. In Hardman, A. & Jones, C. (Eds.) The ethics of sports coaching (pp. 15- 22). New York, NY: Routldedge.

Loland, S. (2000). Fair play and the ethos of sports. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 27 (1), 63-80.

Metaethics. (n.d.) In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaethics/

Malloy, D. C., Ross, S., & Zackus, D. H. (2000). Sport ethics: concepts and cases in sport and recreation. Toronto, ON: Thomson Educational Publishing, Inc.

Morgan, W.J. (2012). Broad internalism, deep conventions, moral entrepreneurs, and sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39(1), 65-100.

Morse, P. (2011). ‘Freak storm’ pounds high school rowers. The Hamilton Spectator. Retrieved from http://www.thespec.com/news-story/2177904--freak-storm-pounds-

high-school-rowers/.

Necessary/Contingent Truths. (n.d.) In The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Retrieved from

http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199541430.001.0001/acref -9780199541430-e-2138?rskey=sskc3G&result=2140

Normative Ethics (n.d.). In Britannica Online Encyclopedia. Retrieved from

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/418412/normative-ethics

Ontario College of Teachers Act, Statues of Ontario (1996, c.12). In Alison, D. (Ed.) Legal digest for Ontario educators 2011-2012 (pp. 234-258). London, ON; The Althouse Press.

Ontario College of Teachers Professional Advisory, Professional Misconduct Related to Sexual Abuse and Sexual Misconduct (2002).

Ontario Secondary School Teacher’s Federation Professional Conduct Guidelines. Retrieved from Ontario Secondary School Teacher’s Federation website:

http://www.osstf.on.ca/en-CA/membership/information-for-ontario-teacher- candidates/osstf-feeso-101-for-teacher-candidates/rights-and-duties-of-osstf-feeso- associate-members/professional-conduct-guidelines

Principle (n.d.) In Oxford Dictionaries. Retrieved from:

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/principle

Polkinghorne, D. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. Qualitative Studies in Education 8(2), 5-23.

Professional Misconduct, Regulations under the Ontario College of Teachers Act. (1996). In Alison, D. (Ed.) Legal digest for Ontario educators 2011-2012 (pp. 292-293).

London, ON: The Althouse Press.

Pinker, S. (2013). Science is not your enemy: an impassioned plea to neglected novelists, embattled professors, and tenure-less historians. New Republic. Retrieved from New Republic website: http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114127/science-not-enemy- humanities

Rowing Canada Aviron (n.d.). Retrieved from Rowing Canada Aviron website:

http://rowingcanada.org/

Rule. (n.d.). In Oxford Dictionaries. Retrieved from

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/rule?q=Rule Russell, J.S. (2007). Children and dangerous sport and recreation. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 34(2), 176-193.

Russell, J.S. (2005). The value of dangerous sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 32 (1),1-19.

Ryall, E., & Olivier, S. (2011). Ethical issues in coaching dangerous sports. In Hardman, A., & Jones, C. (Eds.). The ethics of sports coaching (pp. 185-198). New York, NY: Routledge.

Schneider, A. & Williams, M. (2013). Thoughts on being the gadfly in the sport sciences ointment: building the road to meta-theoretical research creation. Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics. Retrieved from

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17430437.2014.849446#.U8jLBChFHu c

Schneider, A. (2011). Developing a coaching philosophy. In Nolte, V. (Ed.). Rowing faster: Serious training for serious rowers (2nd ed.) (pp. 19-27). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Simon, R. (2013). The ethical coach: An interpretive account of the ethics of coaching. In Simon, R. (Ed.). The ethics of coaching sports: Moral, social and legal issues (pp. 41-59). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Simon, R. (2013). The ethics of coaching. In Simon, R. (Ed.). The ethics of coaching sports: Moral, social and legal issues (pp. 3-8). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Standal, O., & Hemmestad, H. (2011). Becoming a good coach: Coaching and phronesis. In Hardman, A. & Jones, C. (Eds.). The ethics of sports coaching (pp. 45-55). New York, NY: Routledge.

Teaching Profession Act: Revised Statues of Ontario (1990, c. S-54). Retrieved from the ServiceOntario e-laws website: http://www.e-

laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90t02_e.htm

Torres, C., & Hager, P. (2013). Competition, ethics, and coaching youth. In Simon, R. (Ed.). The ethics of coaching sports: Moral, social, and legal issues (pp. 167-184). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Trono, C. (2009). RCA coach weekend #1 reference guide. Toronto, ON: Rowing Canada Aviron & Coaching Association of Canada.

Universalism in Ethics (n.d.). In The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy (rev. 2nd ed.). Retrieved from

http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199541430.001.0001/acref -9780199541430-e-3201?rskey=tu16Bc&result=3202

Van Gelder, T. (1998). The roles of philosophy in cognitive science.” Philosophical Psychology 11(2), 117-136.

Wilson, L.M., Bloom, G.A., & Harvey, W.J. (2010). Sources of knowledge acquisition: perspectives of the high school teacher/coach. Physical education and Sport Pedagogy 15(4), 383-399.

Winchester, G., Culver, D. & Camire, M. (2013). Understanding how ontario high school teacher-coaches learn to coach. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 18(4), 412- 426.

Appendices

Appendix A: Non-Medical Research on Human Subjects—Ethics Approval Notice Combined Letter of Information and Consent Form, & Participant Interview Questions

Appendix B: Sample Open-Ended Group Discussion Exercise Questions Questions to be taken up in small groups.

1.) Take a few moments to consider what you feel are the characteristics and actions of an ideal coach.

2.) What do you value most about the sport of rowing? What morals or ideals do you hope it teaches young athletes?

3.) In general, what do you define as an ethical issue? Does it differ from the definition offered so far in the ‘make ethical decisions’ module? Discuss with your table. 4.) What, do you think the term ‘judgment’ means?

5.) In your coaching practice, have you ever been in a situation where you felt that trapped between two competing sets of ethical demands? How did you frame your problem?

6.) When you have to make a ‘judgment call,’ what does that usually entail? What processes go into making an ethical judgment for you? Can you give an example? 7.) If you feel comfortable, tell a story where you made a bad call, or where you felt you

could have done things better. Tell your group about the details of that situation and how you framed the problem at the time versus how you see it now and what led you to see it in a new light.

8.) Discuss with your group a time that you had to come up with a novel or ‘out-of-the- box’ solution to a situation with ethical implications

9.) What, in general, has shaped your sense of morality? Any experiences, training, mentors? Take a few minutes to discuss in your group.

Curriculum Vitae

Name:       Mark  Williams  

 

Post-­secondary     Denison  University  

Education  and     Granville,  Ohio,  USA  

Degrees:       2002-­‐2006  B.A.  

 

The  University  of  Toronto   Toronto,  Ontario,  Canada   2006-­‐2007  B.Ed.  

 

The  University  of  Western  Ontario   London,  Ontario,  Canada  

2008-­‐2010  M.A.    

The  University  of  Western  Ontario   London,  Ontario,  Canada  

2010-­‐2014  Ph.D..    

 

Honours  and     IAPS  Student  Travel  Award  

Awards:       2011-­‐2013  

   

Related  Work     Teaching  Assistant  

Experience       The  University  of  Western  Ontario  

2010-­‐2014    

Publications:  

Schneider,  A.J.,  Szudy,  N.V.  &  Williams,  M.M.  (2014).  “The  State  of  the  Art:  Meta-­‐Theory   and  New  Research  Methods.”  Journal  of  the  Philosophy  of  Sport  41(1).  pp.  79-­‐95.  

 

Schneider,  A.J.  &  Williams,  M.M.  (2013).  “Thoughts  on  Being  the  Gadfly  in  the  Sport   Sciences  Ointment:  Building  the  Road  to  Meta-­‐Theoretical  Research  Creation.”  Sport  in   Society