CHAPTER 6: METHODS 146
6.12 Statistical analysis 153
Each data set was analyzed using the Student’s t-test on Microsoft Excel, with a two-tailed distribution assuming equal sample variance.
154
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Gurdon, J. B. Adult frogs derived from the nuclei of single somatic cells. Dev. Biol.4, 256– 273 (1962).
2. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell126, 663–676 (2006).
3. Bulger, M. & Groudine, M. Functional and mechanistic diversity of distal transcription enhancers. Cell144, 327–339 (2011).
4. ENCODE Project Consortium et al. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature447, 799–816 (2007).
5. Heintzman, N. D. et al. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nat. Genet.39, 311–318 (2007).
6. Heintzman, N. D. et al. Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type- specific gene expression. Nature459, 108–112 (2009).
7. Natoli, G. Maintaining cell identity through global control of genomic organization.
Immunity33, 12–24 (2010).
8. Voigt, P., Tee, W.-W. & Reinberg, D. A double take on bivalent promoters. Genes Dev.27,
1318–1338 (2013).
9. Blow, M. J. et al. ChIP-Seq identification of weakly conserved heart enhancers. Nat. Genet. 42, 806–810 (2010).
10. Creyghton, M. P. et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.107, 21931–21936 (2010). 11. Ghisletti, S. et al. Identification and characterization of enhancers controlling the
inflammatory gene expression program in macrophages. Immunity32, 317–328 (2010). 12. Rada-Iglesias, A. et al. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental
enhancers in humans. Nature470, 279–283 (2011).
13. Visel, A. et al. ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature 457, 854–858 (2009).
14. Krebs, A. R., Karmodiya, K., Lindahl-Allen, M., Struhl, K. & Tora, L. SAGA and ATAC histone acetyl transferase complexes regulate distinct sets of genes and ATAC defines a class of p300-independent enhancers. Mol. Cell44, 410–423 (2011).
15. May, D. et al. Large-scale discovery of enhancers from human heart tissue. Nat. Genet.44,
89–93 (2012).
16. Vahedi, G. et al. STATs shape the active enhancer landscape of T cell populations. Cell151,
981–993 (2012).
17. Biddie, S. C. et al. Transcription factor AP1 potentiates chromatin accessibility and glucocorticoid receptor binding. Mol. Cell43, 145–155 (2011).
18. Rothenberg, E. V. The chromatin landscape and transcription factors in T cell programming. Trends Immunol.35, 195–204 (2014).
19. Sekiya, T. & Zaret, K. S. Repression by Groucho/TLE/Grg proteins: genomic site
recruitment generates compacted chromatin in vitro and impairs activator binding in vivo.
Mol. Cell28, 291–303 (2007).
20. McManus, S. et al. The transcription factor Pax5 regulates its target genes by recruiting chromatin-modifying proteins in committed B cells. EMBO J.30, 2388–2404 (2011). 21. Garber, M. et al. A high-throughput chromatin immunoprecipitation approach reveals
principles of dynamic gene regulation in mammals. Mol. Cell47, 810–822 (2012). 22. Zhang, J. A., Mortazavi, A., Williams, B. A., Wold, B. J. & Rothenberg, E. V. Dynamic
transformations of genome-wide epigenetic marking and transcriptional control establish T cell identity. Cell149, 467–482 (2012).
23. Payankaulam, S., Li, L. M. & Arnosti, D. N. Transcriptional repression: conserved and evolved features. Curr. Biol. CB20, R764–771 (2010).
155
24. Morrison, S. J., Hemmati, H. D., Wandycz, A. M. & Weissman, I. L. The purification and characterization of fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.92,
10302–10306 (1995).
25. Morrison, S. J. & Weissman, I. L. The long-term repopulating subset of hematopoietic stem cells is deterministic and isolatable by phenotype. Immunity1, 661–673 (1994).
26. Christensen, J. L. & Weissman, I. L. Flk-2 is a marker in hematopoietic stem cell
differentiation: a simple method to isolate long-term stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.98, 14541–14546 (2001).
27. Spangrude, G. J., Heimfeld, S. & Weissman, I. L. Purification and characterization of mouse hematopoietic stem cells. Science241, 58–62 (1988).
28. Forsberg, E. C. et al. Differential expression of novel potential regulators in hematopoietic stem cells. PLoS Genet.1, e28 (2005).
29. Kiel, M. J. et al. SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell121, 1109–1121 (2005).
30. Kim, I., He, S., Yilmaz, O. H., Kiel, M. J. & Morrison, S. J. Enhanced purification of fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells using SLAM family receptors. Blood108, 737–744 (2006). 31. Yilmaz, O. H., Kiel, M. J. & Morrison, S. J. SLAM family markers are conserved among
hematopoietic stem cells from old and reconstituted mice and markedly increase their purity. Blood107, 924–930 (2006).
32. Kondo, M., Weissman, I. L. & Akashi, K. Identification of clonogenic common lymphoid progenitors in mouse bone marrow. Cell91, 661–672 (1997).
33. Akashi, K., Traver, D., Miyamoto, T. & Weissman, I. L. A clonogenic common myeloid progenitor that gives rise to all myeloid lineages. Nature404, 193–197 (2000).
34. Manz, M. G., Miyamoto, T., Akashi, K. & Weissman, I. L. Prospective isolation of human clonogenic common myeloid progenitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.99, 11872–11877 (2002).
35. Laiosa, C. V., Stadtfeld, M. & Graf, T. Determinants of lymphoid-myeloid lineage diversification. Annu. Rev. Immunol.24, 705–738 (2006).
36. Adolfsson, J. et al. Upregulation of Flt3 expression within the bone marrow Lin(-)Sca1(+)c- kit(+) stem cell compartment is accompanied by loss of self-renewal capacity. Immunity15,
659–669 (2001).
37. Dias, S., Månsson, R., Gurbuxani, S., Sigvardsson, M. & Kee, B. L. E2A proteins promote development of lymphoid-primed multipotent progenitors. Immunity29, 217–227 (2008). 38. Georgopoulos, K. et al. The Ikaros gene is required for the development of all lymphoid
lineages. Cell79, 143–156 (1994).
39. Liu, P. et al. Bcl11a is essential for normal lymphoid development. Nat. Immunol.4, 525– 532 (2003).
40. Scott, E. W., Simon, M. C., Anastasi, J. & Singh, H. Requirement of transcription factor PU.1 in the development of multiple hematopoietic lineages. Science265, 1573–1577 (1994). 41. Gwin, K. A., Shapiro, M. B., Dolence, J. J., Huang, Z. L. & Medina, K. L. Hoxa9 and Flt3
signaling synergistically regulate an early checkpoint in lymphopoiesis. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950191, 745–754 (2013).
42. Zohren, F. et al. The transcription factor Lyl-1 regulates lymphoid specification and the maintenance of early T lineage progenitors. Nat. Immunol.13, 761–769 (2012).
43. Yao, Z. et al. Stat5a/b are essential for normal lymphoid development and differentiation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.103, 1000–1005 (2006).
44. Satoh, Y. et al. The Satb1 protein directs hematopoietic stem cell differentiation toward lymphoid lineages. Immunity38, 1105–1115 (2013).
45. Dias, S., Xu, W., McGregor, S. & Kee, B. Transcriptional regulation of lymphocyte development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.18, 441–448 (2008).
46. Yoshida, T. et al. The role of the chromatin remodeler Mi-2beta in hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and multilineage differentiation. Genes Dev.22, 1174–1189 (2008).
47. Borghesi, L. et al. E47 is required for V(D)J recombinase activity in common lymphoid progenitors. J. Exp. Med.202, 1669–1677 (2005).
156
48. Yang, Q. et al. E47 controls the developmental integrity and cell cycle quiescence of multipotential hematopoietic progenitors. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950181, 5885–5894 (2008).
49. De Pooter, R. F. et al. Notch signaling requires GATA-2 to inhibit myelopoiesis from embryonic stem cells and primary hemopoietic progenitors. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950 176, 5267–5275 (2006).
50. Carotta, S. et al. The transcription factor PU.1 controls dendritic cell development and Flt3 cytokine receptor expression in a dose-dependent manner. Immunity32, 628–641 (2010). 51. Medina, K. L. et al. Assembling a gene regulatory network for specification of the B cell fate.
Dev. Cell7, 607–617 (2004).
52. Yoshida, T., Ng, S. Y.-M., Zuniga-Pflucker, J. C. & Georgopoulos, K. Early hematopoietic lineage restrictions directed by Ikaros. Nat. Immunol.7, 382–391 (2006).
53. Schlenner, S. M. et al. Fate mapping reveals separate origins of T cells and myeloid lineages in the thymus. Immunity32, 426–436 (2010).
54. Manz, M. G., Traver, D., Miyamoto, T., Weissman, I. L. & Akashi, K. Dendritic cell potentials of early lymphoid and myeloid progenitors. Blood97, 3333–3341 (2001).
55. Inlay, M. A. et al. Ly6d marks the earliest stage of B-cell specification and identifies the branchpoint between B-cell and T-cell development. Genes Dev.23, 2376–2381 (2009). 56. Sultana, D. A., Zhang, S. L., Todd, S. P. & Bhandoola, A. Expression of functional P-selectin
glycoprotein ligand 1 on hematopoietic progenitors is developmentally regulated. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950188, 4385–4393 (2012).
57. Georgopoulos, K. et al. The Ikaros gene is required for the development of all lymphoid lineages. Cell79, 143–156 (1994).
58. Yang, Q., Saenz, S. A., Zlotoff, D. A., Artis, D. & Bhandoola, A. Cutting edge: Natural helper cells derive from lymphoid progenitors. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950187, 5505–5509 (2011).
59. Possot, C. et al. Notch signaling is necessary for adult, but not fetal, development of RORγt(+) innate lymphoid cells. Nat. Immunol.12, 949–958 (2011).
60. Wong, S. H. et al. Transcription factor RORα is critical for nuocyte development. Nat. Immunol.13, 229–236 (2012).
61. Schwarz, B. A. et al. Selective thymus settling regulated by cytokine and chemokine receptors. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950178, 2008–2017 (2007).
62. Schwarz, B. A. & Bhandoola, A. Circulating hematopoietic progenitors with T lineage potential. Nat. Immunol.5, 953–960 (2004).
63. Allman, D. et al. Thymopoiesis independent of common lymphoid progenitors. Nat. Immunol.4, 168–174 (2003).
64. Wada, H. et al. Adult T-cell progenitors retain myeloid potential. Nature452, 768–772 (2008).
65. Bell, J. J. & Bhandoola, A. The earliest thymic progenitors for T cells possess myeloid lineage potential. Nature452, 764–767 (2008).
66. Luc, S. et al. The earliest thymic T cell progenitors sustain B cell and myeloid lineage potential. Nat. Immunol.13, 412–419 (2012).
67. Sambandam, A. et al. Notch signaling controls the generation and differentiation of early T lineage progenitors. Nat. Immunol.6, 663–670 (2005).
68. Tan, J. B., Visan, I., Yuan, J. S. & Guidos, C. J. Requirement for Notch1 signals at sequential early stages of intrathymic T cell development. Nat. Immunol.6, 671–679 (2005).
69. Wu, L. et al. CD4 expressed on earliest T-lineage precursor cells in the adult murine thymus. Nature349, 71–74 (1991).
70. Lehar, S. M., Dooley, J., Farr, A. G. & Bevan, M. J. Notch ligands Delta 1 and Jagged1 transmit distinct signals to T-cell precursors. Blood105, 1440–1447 (2005).
71. Maillard, I. et al. Mastermind critically regulates Notch-mediated lymphoid cell fate decisions. Blood104, 1696–1702 (2004).
72. Radtke, F. et al. Deficient T cell fate specification in mice with an induced inactivation of Notch1. Immunity10, 547–558 (1999).
157
73. Wilson, A., MacDonald, H. R. & Radtke, F. Notch 1-deficient common lymphoid precursors adopt a B cell fate in the thymus. J. Exp. Med.194, 1003–1012 (2001).
74. Hozumi, K. et al. Delta-like 4 is indispensable in thymic environment specific for T cell development. J. Exp. Med.205, 2507–2513 (2008).
75. Koch, U. et al. Delta-like 4 is the essential, nonredundant ligand for Notch1 during thymic T cell lineage commitment. J. Exp. Med.205, 2515–2523 (2008).
76. Visan, I., Yuan, J. S., Tan, J. B., Cretegny, K. & Guidos, C. J. Regulation of intrathymic T-cell development by Lunatic Fringe- Notch1 interactions. Immunol. Rev.209, 76–94 (2006). 77. Yashiro-Ohtani, Y., Ohtani, T. & Pear, W. S. Notch regulation of early thymocyte
development. Semin. Immunol.22, 261–269 (2010).
78. Rothenberg, E. V. Transcriptional control of early T and B cell developmental choices. Annu. Rev. Immunol.32, 283–321 (2014).
79. Georgescu, C. et al. A gene regulatory network armature for T lymphocyte specification.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.105, 20100–20105 (2008).
80. Maillard, I. et al. The requirement for Notch signaling at the beta-selection checkpoint in vivo is absolute and independent of the pre-T cell receptor. J. Exp. Med.203, 2239–2245 (2006).
81. Reizis, B. & Leder, P. Direct induction of T lymphocyte-specific gene expression by the mammalian Notch signaling pathway. Genes Dev.16, 295–300 (2002).
82. Balciunaite, G., Ceredig, R. & Rolink, A. G. The earliest subpopulation of mouse thymocytes contains potent T, significant macrophage, and natural killer cell but no B-lymphocyte potential. Blood105, 1930–1936 (2005).
83. De Obaldia, M. E., Bell, J. J. & Bhandoola, A. Early T-cell progenitors are the major granulocyte precursors in the adult mouse thymus. Blood121, 64–71 (2013).
84. Masuda, K. et al. T cell lineage determination precedes the initiation of TCR beta gene rearrangement. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950179, 3699–3706 (2007).
85. Taghon, T., Yui, M. A., Pant, R., Diamond, R. A. & Rothenberg, E. V. Developmental and molecular characterization of emerging beta- and gammadelta-selected pre-T cells in the adult mouse thymus. Immunity24, 53–64 (2006).
86. Teague, T. K. et al. CD28 expression redefines thymocyte development during the pre-T to DP transition. Int. Immunol.22, 387–397 (2010).
87. Rothenberg, E. V., Zhang, J. & Li, L. Multilayered specification of the T-cell lineage fate.
Immunol. Rev.238, 150–168 (2010).
88. Feyerabend, T. B. et al. Deletion of Notch1 converts pro-T cells to dendritic cells and promotes thymic B cells by cell-extrinsic and cell-intrinsic mechanisms. Immunity30, 67– 79 (2009).
89. Ardavin, C., Wu, L., Li, C. L. & Shortman, K. Thymic dendritic cells and T cells develop simultaneously in the thymus from a common precursor population. Nature362, 761–763 (1993).
90. Wu, L., Antica, M., Johnson, G. R., Scollay, R. & Shortman, K. Developmental potential of the earliest precursor cells from the adult mouse thymus. J. Exp. Med.174, 1617–1627 (1991).
91. García-Ojeda, M. E. et al. GATA-3 promotes T-cell specification by repressing B-cell potential in pro-T cells in mice. Blood121, 1749–1759 (2013).
92. Weber, B. N. et al. A critical role for TCF-1 in T-lineage specification and differentiation.
Nature476, 63–68 (2011).
93. Perera, J., Meng, L., Meng, F. & Huang, H. Autoreactive thymic B cells are efficient antigen- presenting cells of cognate self-antigens for T cell negative selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.110, 17011–17016 (2013).
94. Kawamata, S., Du, C., Li, K. & Lavau, C. Overexpression of the Notch target genes Hes in vivo induces lymphoid and myeloid alterations. Oncogene21, 3855–3863 (2002).
95. Ikawa, T. et al. An essential developmental checkpoint for production of the T cell lineage.
Science329, 93–96 (2010).
96. Li, L., Leid, M. & Rothenberg, E. V. An early T cell lineage commitment checkpoint dependent on the transcription factor Bcl11b. Science329, 89–93 (2010).
158
97. De Obaldia, M. E. et al. T cell development requires constraint of the myeloid regulator C/EBP-α by the Notch target and transcriptional repressor Hes1. Nat. Immunol.14, 1277– 1284 (2013).
98. Ramond, C. et al. Two waves of distinct hematopoietic progenitor cells colonize the fetal thymus. Nat. Immunol.15, 27–35 (2014).
99. Lu, M. et al. The earliest thymic progenitors in adults are restricted to T, NK, and dendritic cell lineage and have a potential to form more diverse TCRbeta chains than fetal
progenitors. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950175, 5848–5856 (2005).
100. Porritt, H. E. et al. Heterogeneity among DN1 prothymocytes reveals multiple progenitors with different capacities to generate T cell and non-T cell lineages. Immunity20, 735–745 (2004).
101. Schmitt, T. M., Ciofani, M., Petrie, H. T. & Zúñiga-Pflücker, J. C. Maintenance of T cell specification and differentiation requires recurrent notch receptor-ligand interactions. J. Exp. Med.200, 469–479 (2004).
102. Cherrier, M., Sawa, S. & Eberl, G. Notch, Id2, and RORγt sequentially orchestrate the fetal development of lymphoid tissue inducer cells. J. Exp. Med.209, 729–740 (2012).
103. Fiorini, E. et al. Cutting edge: thymic crosstalk regulates delta-like 4 expression on cortical epithelial cells. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950181, 8199–8203 (2008).
104. Li, P. et al. Reprogramming of T cells to natural killer-like cells upon Bcl11b deletion.
Science329, 85–89 (2010).
105. Liu, P., Li, P. & Burke, S. Critical roles of Bcl11b in T-cell development and maintenance of T-cell identity. Immunol. Rev.238, 138–149 (2010).
106. Wakabayashi, Y. et al. Bcl11b is required for differentiation and survival of alphabeta T lymphocytes. Nat. Immunol.4, 533–539 (2003).
107. Okazuka, K. et al. p53 prevents maturation of T cell development to the immature CD4- CD8+ stage in Bcl11b-/- mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.328, 545–549 (2005). 108. Boos, M. D., Yokota, Y., Eberl, G. & Kee, B. L. Mature natural killer cell and lymphoid
tissue-inducing cell development requires Id2-mediated suppression of E protein activity. J. Exp. Med.204, 1119–1130 (2007).
109. Albu, D. I. et al. BCL11B is required for positive selection and survival of double-positive thymocytes. J. Exp. Med.204, 3003–3015 (2007).
110. Di Santo, J. P. Natural killer cell developmental pathways: a question of balance. Annu. Rev. Immunol.24, 257–286 (2006).
111. Vosshenrich, C. A. J. et al. A thymic pathway of mouse natural killer cell development characterized by expression of GATA-3 and CD127. Nat. Immunol.7, 1217–1224 (2006). 112. Hansson, M. et al. Natural NK-cell targets in the mouse thymus: characteristics of the
sensitive cell population. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950123, 765–771 (1979).
113. Schott, E., Bonasio, R. & Ploegh, H. L. Elimination in vivo of developing T cells by natural killer cells. J. Exp. Med.198, 1213–1224 (2003).
114. Rossi, S. W. et al. RANK signals from CD4(+)3(-) inducer cells regulate development of Aire-expressing epithelial cells in the thymic medulla. J. Exp. Med.204, 1267–1272 (2007). 115. Rolink, A. G., Nutt, S. L., Melchers, F. & Busslinger, M. Long-term in vivo reconstitution of
T-cell development by Pax5-deficient B-cell progenitors. Nature401, 603–606 (1999). 116. Nutt, S. L., Heavey, B., Rolink, A. G. & Busslinger, M. Commitment to the B-lymphoid
lineage depends on the transcription factor Pax5. Nature401, 556–562 (1999).
117. Pongubala, J. M. R. et al. Transcription factor EBF restricts alternative lineage options and promotes B cell fate commitment independently of Pax5. Nat. Immunol.9, 203–215 (2008).
118. Banerjee, A., Northrup, D., Boukarabila, H., Jacobsen, S. E. W. & Allman, D. Transcriptional repression of Gata3 is essential for early B cell commitment. Immunity38, 930–942 (2013).
119. Nechanitzky, R. et al. Transcription factor EBF1 is essential for the maintenance of B cell identity and prevention of alternative fates in committed cells. Nat. Immunol.14, 867–875 (2013).
159
120. Souabni, A., Cobaleda, C., Schebesta, M. & Busslinger, M. Pax5 promotes B lymphopoiesis and blocks T cell development by repressing Notch1. Immunity17, 781–793 (2002). 121. Cantor, A. B. & Orkin, S. H. Transcriptional regulation of erythropoiesis: an affair involving
multiple partners. Oncogene21, 3368–3376 (2002).
122. Welch, J. J. et al. Global regulation of erythroid gene expression by transcription factor GATA-1. Blood104, 3136–3147 (2004).
123. Iwasaki, H. et al. GATA-1 converts lymphoid and myelomonocytic progenitors into the megakaryocyte/erythrocyte lineages. Immunity19, 451–462 (2003).
124. Ikawa, T., Kawamoto, H., Goldrath, A. W. & Murre, C. E proteins and Notch signaling cooperate to promote T cell lineage specification and commitment. J. Exp. Med.203, 1329– 1342 (2006).
125. Bailey, A. M. & Posakony, J. W. Suppressor of hairless directly activates transcription of enhancer of split complex genes in response to Notch receptor activity. Genes Dev.9,
2609–2622 (1995).
126. Corbo, J. C., Fujiwara, S., Levine, M. & Di Gregorio, A. Suppressor of hairless activates brachyury expression in the Ciona embryo. Dev. Biol.203, 358–368 (1998).
127. Sasai, Y., Kageyama, R., Tagawa, Y., Shigemoto, R. & Nakanishi, S. Two mammalian helix- loop-helix factors structurally related to Drosophila hairy and Enhancer of split. Genes Dev. 6, 2620–2634 (1992).
128. Kageyama, R., Ohtsuka, T. & Kobayashi, T. The Hes gene family: repressors and oscillators that orchestrate embryogenesis. Dev. Camb. Engl.134, 1243–1251 (2007).
129. Zhang, J. et al. The genetic basis of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
Nature481, 157–163 (2012).
130. Sakata-Yanagimoto, M. et al. Coordinated regulation of transcription factors through Notch2 is an important mediator of mast cell fate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.105, 7839– 7844 (2008).
131. Ross, D. A. et al. Functional analysis of Hes-1 in preadipocytes. Mol. Endocrinol. Baltim. Md20, 698–705 (2006).
132. Benz, C. & Bleul, C. C. A multipotent precursor in the thymus maps to the branching point of the T versus B lineage decision. J. Exp. Med.202, 21–31 (2005).
133. Matsuzaki, Y. et al. Characterization of c-kit positive intrathymic stem cells that are restricted to lymphoid differentiation. J. Exp. Med.178, 1283–1292 (1993).
134. Krueger, A., Willenzon, S., Lyszkiewicz, M., Kremmer, E. & Förster, R. CC chemokine receptor 7 and 9 double-deficient hematopoietic progenitors are severely impaired in seeding the adult thymus. Blood115, 1906–1912 (2010).
135. Zlotoff, D. A. et al. CCR7 and CCR9 together recruit hematopoietic progenitors to the adult