USING RTI APPLICATIONS AGINST 498A FAMILY:

Advantages:

1.Cheaper mode & consumes relatively lesser time to close the case.(2 – 6 Months) 2.We can screw the 498a family royally, with this “Legal Cruelty” tool.

3.May cause irretrievable damage to the opponents, apart from closure of 498a case.

4.Can handle without legal aid.

5.No limit & can fire numerous RTIs based on the opponents’ profile..

Disadvantages:

1.498a family members or witnesses needs to be government job.

2.Needs to cope up with time delay for RTI replies from govt. departments & information commission response for appeals.

3.Government machinery may not work with expected efficiency.

4.Very indirect method of attacking the opponents.

---

Since you have read so much - you must be tired. So, on a lighter side of things read the below article to cheer you up.

Bottom line is it is hard work and patience-- see how one person quashed his case by sheer persistence and hard work.

GENERAL

1.Sent CrPc 161 witness statements with all the blatant lies to 498a family's relatives, family elders and neighbours.

2.Sent copies of newspaper & magazine articles about 498a misuse, to their relatives, family elders and neighbours.

3.Called up 498a gang’s relatives, family elders and neighbours & explained about the false 498a case.

4.Complained to Tamilnadu Revenue Secretary, & District Collector about the false 498a case & extortion threats.

5.Complained to State Human Rights Commission on extortion threats by 498a gang, police & lawyers.

6.Complained to Lok Adalat Judges on extortion threats by 498a gang, police & lawyers.

7.Complained to DGP of the state, on extortion threats by 498a gang, police & lawyers.

AGAINST 498a FAMILY

8.Sent RTIs to FIL's Dept., to get his pay scale & asset declaration details, as per Tamilnadu Govt. Servants Conduct Rules.

9.Sent RTI to FIL's Dept., to get Compliance of Dowry Prohibition Act, by Govt employees, as per Tamilnadu Govt. Servants Conduct Rules.

10.Sent RTI to FIL's dept., to get his declaration on list of gifts received for her daughter's marriage, as per Tamilnadu Govt. Servants Conduct Rules.

11.Sent 12 RTIs to FIL's office to get his office deliverable, accounts maintenance and Govt. money spending details in last 25 years.

12.Complained to Revenue Dept. on disproportionate asset accumulation details by FIL.

13.Complained to Revenue Dept. to report non-compliance of Dowry Prohibition Act by FIL, with respect to his CrPc statement.

14.Complained to DSP-Vigilance & Anti Corruption Dept.in person, to report disproportionate asset accumulation details by FIL.

18.Sent RTIs to Directorate of Technical Education, to get details of the employment of 498a girl, who is working as Lecturer in a private engineering college.

19.Sent RTIs to Directorate of Technical Education, to get details of pending cases, complaints and arrears during graduation of 498a girl, who is working as Lecturer in a private engineering college.

20.Complained to State Information Commission on refusal of information for one of the RTI by FIL.

warned about repercussions on PIO, if the RTI replies are delayed.

24.Called up Principal of 498a girl's college & explained her activities to extort money by filing false case.

25.Visited 498a family's residence area with completely shaved head, to know the details of the houses they have rented out for Complaining to Vigilance department.( Since 506 IPC also in FIR, i had to go in disguise)

26. Visited FIL's office with shaved head to watch his activities & befriended a local big shot's son to set up bribe trap for FIL, as advised by DSP - Vigilance & Anti-corruption Dept. of TN Police.

AGAINST THE WITNESSES

27.Sent RTI to BSNL, to get Pay scale & asset declaration details of one of the witness (Retired), with the intention to complain to BSNL, Central Vigilance Commission &

Pension Directorate.

28.Sent RTI to TN State Hand-loom Dept. to get Dowry Prohibition Act compliance declaration for their daughters’ marriages, pay scale & asset declaration details of one of the witnesses (Retired), with intention to complain to Vigilance dept & State pension directorate.

29.Sent RTI to Sales Tax department, to get details of the sales tax paid by the company run by one of the witness.

30.Sent RTIs to one of the witness’s son’s parents-in-laws’ offices (Govt. Job) to get Dowry Prohibition Act compliance declaration for their daughters’marriages, pay scale &

asset declaration details.

31.Sent CrPc 161 statements to one of the witness’s son’s parents-in-laws & neighbours.

32.Visited parents'-in- law of one of the witness's son, & explained their Son-in-law family's false statements in 498a case.

AGAINST THE INSTIGATORS:

33.Sent RTIs to Police department to get Dowry Prohibition Act compliance declaration for their daughters’ marriages, pay scale & asset declaration details of one of the instigators of the 498a case, who was working as DSP.

34.Sent RTIs to Police department to get details of NOC obtained from govt. to get passport, by one of the instigators of 498a case, who was working as DSP.

35.Complained to Enforcement Directorate to report disproportionate asset details by the retired police DSP, who used to visit USA frequently.

36.Sent RTI to Medical Council of India to get pay scale & asset declaration details of a doctor, who is the Son-in Law of one of the instigators of 498a case.

37.Sent 498a case details & 498a gang’s malicious plans to Sons-in Law's family of the DSP, who was instrumental in filing false 498a case.

38.Sent RTI to SEBI (Securities & Exchange Board of India), to get details of the leave details and travel expense details of 498a girl’s uncle, who used to attend the hearings, when he is on duty. (Working in a Private Listed Company)

39.Sent RTI to Reserve Bank of India to get locker details of one of witness, who has stored the 498a girl's jewels.

> >

AGAINST THE POLICE:

40.Sent complaints to DGP, Commissioner and IO (Who registered 498a) to register case U/s 406 IPC for non return of Jewels by the 498a gang.IO refused to accept 3 registered letters. She called me up & asked not to press the 406 complaint & assured for return of Jewels worth of Rs.1.8 Lakhs.IO blasted the 498a girl & her father in my presence, for (Add.Commissioner) & IO, for severe departmental action with State Information Commission's Recommendation, for non reply of RTI in time.

43.Sent RTI to Police department to get “498a case Registration Guideline Adherence”

details by 2 Investigative Officers who filed 2 FIRs.

******************

Got married in 2001 to a girl from xxx, haryana. That ill mannered and uncouth lady left my home in oct 2006. In Feb 2007 when I received the threat of false dowry case from a common relative , I sent e mail to DGP Haryana and CP Delhi immediately expressing their threatening and other details. With intervention of common relatives a fair

settlement was done and signed by her and my relatives in Oct 2007. Luckily no child was born out of this wedlock. But they went back on this agreement and asked 10 lakh more and that too in cash. When all efforts failed , I filed for Divorce in May 2008 ( my mistake) following the guidance of my advocate Comrade R P Chugh, the owner of so called "Man cell". His signboards are spread all over Delhi and somehow that quack gets his name and interviews published in media ,TV talkshows ,radio etc. He told me that if I file DIVORCE first ,her 498A will be considered as counterblast.I got convinced that if I approach court first then I will be safe. After receiving summons she submitted 498a/406 complaint at local PS at Panipat in June 2008. Police under their influence registerd FIR bypassing the Women Cell of Panipat. That Quack filed my bail application in Delhi court, which I did not get. Then he filed at Delhi High court for bail and FIR transfer.

Since I was having zero knowledge of law, the money for all these exercises in futility he looted from me was approx 4 lakh. As I told in my earlier mail I was arrested in july 2008 and spent four days in police remand at police station Panipat.

My two counter attacks which cracked them were-

1. My criminal complaint case filed under section 384,386,500,506 against girl,her mother and brothers.The ACMM finding merit in my case admitted it under Crpc 200. At the time of complainant's evidence (mine), I submitted a list of witnesses and included her two relatives (who signed the agreement dated Oct 2007) in that list . When the police reached their house and served summons for appearance in court, panick gripped their entire family.One relative appeared in the court on the date and admitted that a mutual agreement between two families had indeed been signed in oct 2007 and confirmed his signature on that agreement paper.The other relative ,out of fear, did not receive

summons by paying to the server.

2. My second attack was complaint to the Income Tax Office , Panipat by way of Tax Evasion Petition (TEP). I attached their FIR copy (with TEP) in which they claimed to have spent over Rs 20 lakh in marriage. In reality they had spent hardly 6 lakh. So IT guys started investigations in their assets. I followed up my complaint with RTIs asking progress.

Therefore my dear friends , never bow in front of "Kaminey" people and have faith in GOD that if you are right and innocent,you will prevail upon all odds. Its just a matter of time. Have killer instict and never become timid, come whatever may. Show your enemies that you dont mind even getting hanged , leave alone going to jail, but will not

meet any of their unwarranted demands.

****************

CIC decision below for tax evasion petition:

Facts:

‘The petitioner was married in 2000 to Smt. Saroj Nirmal. In November 2000 she filed a criminal complaint alleging that she had spent/paid as dowry an amount of Rs. Ten Lakhs. Alleging that these claims were false, the Petitioner, with a view to defend the criminal prosecution launched against him, approached the Income Tax Department with

a tax evasion petition (TEP) dated 24.09.2003. Thereafter, in 2004 the Income Tax Department summoned the Petitioner's wife to present her case before them.

Meanwhile, the Petitioner made repeated requests to the Director of Income Tax (Investigation) to know the status of the hearing and TEP proceedings. On failing to get a response from the second and third Respondents, he moved an application under the Act in November, 2005. He requested for the following information:

(i) Fate of Petitioner's complaint (tax evasion petition) dated 24.09.2003 (ii) What is the other source of income of petitioner's wife Smt. Saroj Nimal than from teaching as a primary teacher in a private school ' iii)What action the Department had taken against Smt. Saroj Nimal after issuing a notice u/s 131 of the Income 'tax Act, 1961, pursuant to the said Tax Evasion Petition.

The petitioner filed a second Appeal on 1st March, 2006, before the Respondent No.

1, the Central Information Commission (hereafter 'the]*20 The CIC, on 8th May 2006 allowed the second appeal and set aside the rejection of information, and the exemption Clause 8(1) (j) cited by Respondents No. 2and3. The CIC further held that as the investigation on TEP has been conducted by DIT (Inv), the relevant report is the outcome of public action which needs to be disclosed. This, therefore, cannot be exempted u/s 8(1) (j) as interpreted by the appellate authority. Accordingly, DIT (Inv) is directed to disclose the report as per the provision u/s 10(1) and (2), after the entire process of investigation and tax recovery, if any, is complete in every respect.

the B* back.