In meditation, in m y m in d ’s eye, I g o to Goldie, o n e o f m y current spirit guides. I a s k him to h e lp m e re m o v e the m in d veil:
“I want to se e e ve ry th ing a r o u n d m e,” I tell Goldie. " I w ant to se e the w hole of creation. ”
“O n e c a n n o t s e e it all," G o ld ie says, “b e c a u s e it is infinitely recursive. Just like a p roton is p art o f a n atom, w h ich in turn is p art o f a m olecule, s o is the C reation struc tured. The u n iv e rse is p art o f s o m e th in g bigger, w h ic h is p art o f so m e th in g e ve n bigger, a n d s o o n into eternity. The p h y s ic a l w o r ld is p art o f the spirit w orld. The spirit world is also infinitely recursive. ”
This is a g ro u n d b re a k in g insight f o r me. Th e re is n o e n d to anything. There is n o final d e stina tion to o u r s o u ls ’ p ro gre ss, f o r n o th in g en ds.
"T h e n I w ant to se e a p retty big pictu re .”
A n o th e r spirit c o m e s u p a n d g iv e s m e a thing that l o o k s lik e a lam p. I stare into the la m p a n d it b lin d s m e w ith y e llo w light. T h e light c h a n g e s color. The b a c k o f my p h y sica l n e c k is tingling. The e n e rg y pa tte rn in m y n e c k is o p e n in g . I see, n ot in visions, b u t in feelings, h o w the sp irit w o r ld is. It is b u ilt f ro m fe e lin g s that h a v e n o n a m e s in hu m a n langu ages. The y re m in d m e o f beauty, h o p e , self-re alization, o p e n n e s s, a d v e n ture, a n d creativity.
In th is c h a p te r , I a t t e m p t t o lo o s e n y o u r b e lie fs a b o u t w h a t reality is. You d o n o t n e c e s s a r ily h a v e t o a g r e e w ith w h a t I w r ite . T h e im p o r t a n t th in g is t h a t y o u a c c e p t t h e p o s s ib ility t h a t t h e r e m a y b e m o re to re a lity a n d life t h a n y o u h a v e b e e n t a u g h t . T h is p o i n t o f v iew will help you m a k e th e b e s t o f y o u r a s tr a l e x p e r i e n c e s . I will t r y to re m o v e any lim itin g e x p e c ta tio n s o f t h e a s tr a l f r o m y o u r b e lie f s y s te m , to give you an e a s i e r tim e l e a r n in g f ro m y o u r a s tr a l tr a v e ls . H o w e v e r, b e c a u s e chang-
Physical Realities
life' < “*
' rStandi"8 ofC ,4 There's" L lsW el" .ck d "11 , n ’ M 0 3 lamp W. The bad- — 5
. op*1'1'
- f e i ^ r ‘l e ‘ 0,o 'e '°of
v * v e <n) t o g ' jng a b e l i e f s y s te m is o n e o f t h e m o s t d iff ic u lt th in g s a p e r s o n c a n d o you mav w a n t to r e a d t h is c h a p t e r m o r e t h a n o n c e .Limiting B eliefs
Too m a n y p e o p le v ie w t h e p h y s ic a l a s t h e o n ly re a lity . T h e y believ e th a t a n y th in g r e a l m u s t b e p h y s ic a l. T o t h e m , t h e r e a r e tw o a lte rn a tiv e s : a stra l p r o je c tio n is a p h y s ic a l p h e n o m e n o n , o r it is a h a llu c in a tio n . It is in co n ceiv ab le to m o s t o f u s t h a t a p e r s o n c a n e n t e r a n o t h e r d im e n s io n , w hich is n o t p h y s ic a l, a n d still v ie w t h e j o u r n e y a s r e a l. S t a r t in g f ro m th is n a rro w p o in t o f v iew , t h o s e w h o a t t e m p t to v a lid a te o r in v a lid a te th e re a l ity o f a s tr a l p r o je c tio n ( a n d I h a v e a t t e m p t e d it) a r e a c tu a lly u sin g th e physical to t r y to p r o v e t h a t a s tr a l p r o je c ti o n is r e a l. T h is is im p o s s ib le to show, o f c o u r s e , s in c e a s tr a l p r o je c tio n is n o t a p h y sic a l p h e n o m e n o n .
As a b r a i n t e a s e r , w h a t w o u ld h a p p e n if s o m e o n e m a n a g e d to p ro v e th a t a n a s tr a l p r o je c ti o n c a n m a n i f e s t s o m e th in g , le t ’s sa y a cool b r e e z e of air, in t h e p h y s ic a l? W o u ld o n ly t h e p h y s ic a l m a n if e s ta tio n b e v iew ed as re a l? W e c a n ’t p r o v e t h a t t h e r e s t o f th e a s tr a l p r o je c tio n is p h y sical, so t h a t m u s t m e a n t h a t t h a t p a r t is u n r e a l, r ig h t? T h e c a u se b e c o m e s u n rea l a n d t h e e ff e c t b e c o m e s r e a l.
T h a t w ay o f th in k in g is w id e s p r e a d in m o d e r n s c ie n c e . It is th e lim it ing fa c to r in m e d ic in e . F o r e x a m p le , it is a little -k n o w n fac t th a t all dis ea se o rig in a te s in th e m in d —a re a lm t h a t is v iew ed a s u n r e a l—a n d th a t m any o f th e s y m p to m s a p p e a r in t h e p h y sic a l. B lin d e d by o u r b e lie f in th e physical, w e tr y to h e a l t h e d is e a s e by w ip in g o u t th e ph y sical sy m p to m s. W e pay n o a tte n tio n to th e i r o rig in . A s a re s u lt, th e d ise a s e su rv iv es a n d a p p e a rs in o t h e r s y m p to m s , like a t r e e t h a t h a s b e e n c u t g ro w s a lte rn a te b ran c h e s. W h a t w e m u s t u n d e r s ta n d is th a t th e origin o f d ise a s e is the key to h e a lth a n d sy m p to m s a r e c r e a te d m ere ly to a ssist us, a le rtin g us of th e p re s e n c e o f t h e d ise a s e , so th a t w e m ay deal w ith its origin.
S c ien tists re fu s e to e n t e r r e s e a r c h a re a s th a t a r e c o n sid e re d im p ro p e r: a s tra l p ro je c tio n , in tu itio n , p rec o g n itio n , clairv o y an ce, te le p a thy, tele k in e sis, r e m o te view ing, UF O s, a n d d re a m s , to n a m e a few. Those w ho d o je o p a rd iz e th e i r c a re e r s a n d risk ridicule from th e ir p e e rs. But. w ho d ec id e s w h a t is p r o p e r a n d im p ro p e r? T h e ego. T h e soul d o es n o t have th e lim itatio n s o f p r o p e r a n d im p ro p er.
Science has beco m e institu tio n alized a n d has th e re b y lo st th e flexi bility n e e d ed to investigate a p h e n o m e n o n like a s tra l p ro je c tio n . T h e re is no g r e a te r tra g e d y th a n th is. Som ehow , we have ex tinguished th e flam e th a t driv es scien ce—th e d e s ire to know t r u t h —a n d in so d oing we have p re v e n te d r e s e a r c h th a t could lea d u s in to a b e tte r w o rld . W e could all b e co m m u n icatin g te le p a th ic ally by now , h a d w e given th e p h e n o m e n o n th e p r o p e r sc ie n tific in v estig atio n it d e s e r v e d a few y e a rs back. Som ehow , th e d e s ire to k n o w th e t r u t h h a s b e e n r e p la c e d w ith th e d e s ire to d e fe n d w h a t w e p rev io u sly a c c e p te d a s tr u t h , fo r no rea so n o th e r th a n w e in v este d p rid e in th e m a s tr u th s . But. h u m a n k in d ca n ’t evolve by clinging to y e s te r d a y ’s tr u th s . T h e h u m a n m in d is evolving.
W e a re e n ric h in g o u r re a lity to in clu d e d im e n s io n s o u tsid e th e phys ical. W ith th is , n e w tr u t h s will s u rf a c e . T h a t is u n a v o id a b le . T h a t is how evolution w o rk s a n d h a s w o rk e d s in c e t h e b i r t h o f w h a te v e r w a s th e b e g in n in g , if t h e r e e v e r w a s o n e . S o m e n e w t r u t h s will m a k e u s q u e stio n old t r u th s (or, r a t h e r , w h a t w e th o u g h t w e r e t r u t h s ) , b u t th is is only h e a lth y . W h a t is u n h e a lth y , o n th e o t h e r h a n d , is to clin g to o u td a te d t ru th s , a s if th e y w e r e o u r life lin e .
T h e r e is n o th in g w r o n g w ith th e s c ie n tif ic m o d e l. W h a t is w ro n g is t h a t th e c u r r e n t s e t o f t r u t h s —t r u t h s t h a t s u p p o s e d ly w e r e co llected using th e s c ie n tific m o d e l—is c o n t a m in a t e d b y fa ls e a s s u m p tio n s ab o u t w h a t c o n s titu te s re a lity . O u r c a r e l e s s a s s u m p tio n s a b o u t w h a t re a lity is h a v e led u s to a d e a d e n d . H e r e a r e s o m e e x a m p le s o f fa ls e a ssu m p tio n s : t h e p h y sic a l d im e n s io n is e x te r n a l; a n y th in g n o t c o n n e c t e d to th e physi cal is a n illu sio n ; r e a lity is c o n s ta n t a n d , t h e r e f o r e , a f lu id w o rld is less re a l t h a n a slo w -c h a n g in g w o r ld ; a n d a n y th in g w e c a n ’t g r a s p w ith ou r logical m in d s is u n r e a l. T h e s c ie n tif ic m o d e l h a s a m e c h a n is m f o r rep la c ing in v a lid a te d t r u t h s , b u t t h a t m e c h a n i s m is b lo c k e d b y t h e a s su m p tio n s o f th o u s a n d s o f s c ie n tis ts . T h e s e a s s u m p t io n s , in t u r n , a r e b a s e d on b e lie fs h e ld by s c ie n tis ts . A s m u c h a s o n e t r i e s , it is d iffic u lt to b e an o b jec tiv e s c ie n tis t. W h e n p r e s e n t e d w ith t h e r e s u l ts o f a n e x p e rim e n t, it is h u m a n n a tu r e to fall b a c k u p o n p r e v io u s ly h e ld b e lie fs w h e n in te r p re t in g t h e m . It is d iffic u lt to c o m e u p w ith t h e o r i e s t h a t c o n flic t w ith th e c o re o l w h a t o n e h a s b e e n ta u g h t.
ln,0S
' "'° rid .Wp 8 " f en »h “"to " , e p h e " » % f7 ^ h acl Placed with ,he'■ f 0 r » ° reaso,
M a n k in d can’t d is evolving, •iitside the phys- t>le. That is how latev er was the a k e us question b u t this is only ing to outdated fh at is wrong is w e r e collected i m p t i o n s about w h a t re a lity » s e a s s u m p t i 0115; e d t o t h e P ^ sl Irl is I ',S- i d w o r k * " i S " ' n . p t i» "S f e e d - " > “ r he »n " e X , ’e ! o t e r P ret w h e ” 1 tbf ^-v iost
t,
Sunday, M arch 17, 2 0 0 2My Essence
I h a v e lo n g w o n d e r e d i f l a m a so u l, u n b o u n d e d b y m y p h y sic a l bod y, o r if l a m a little c o n s c io u s n e s s b e lo n g in g to a b o d y, w h ic h is in u s e o f a n d m a n ip u la te d b y a so u l u n k n o w n to me. It is c le a r n o w that I a m a so ul. I f I w e re the b od y, I w o u ld no t b e able to haue astral p rojection s.O n e m ight a r g u e that the b o d y - b o u n d e d c o n s c io u s n e s s c o u ld project (pe rhap s with the h e lp o f the so ul), b u t w h a t w o u l d b e the p u r p o s e o f s u c h a b ility ? It d o e s not make s e n se that a b o d y - b o u n d e d c o n s c io u s n e s s c a n project, b e c a u s e it d ie s with the body. If it d id n o t d ie w ith the b o d y , it w o u l d n o t b e b o u n d e d b y the b o d y in the first place, a n d that m a k e s it a so ul.
It is m o re likely that it is the s o u l that projects, a n d s in c e I a m the o n e projecting, I am that soul. T h e p r o je c tio n s p r o v e that I, the so ul, am a b le to su rv iv e w ithout a body. Therefore, I w ill s u r v iv e p h y s ic a l d eath. P hew , w h a t a relief.
It is n o t t o o d iffic u lt t o c o n c e iv e t h a t o u r fiv e s e n s e s c a n ’t p e rc e iv e all o f c r e a tio n . If y o u s u b s c r ib e to t h e t h e o r y o f e v o lu tio n , th e n a physi cal s e n s e is a to o l t h a t o u r a n c e s t o r s c r e a t e d , p o s s ib ly by c o in c id e n c e , in o r d e r to im p ro v e t h e i r c h a n c e s o f s u rv iv a l. F o r e x a m p le , a n im a ls th a t live u n d e r g r o u n d h a v e n o u s e f o r p h y s ic a l e y e s b e c a u s e it is to o d a rk for th e m to s e e a n d , s o , th e y d o n o t d e v e lo p e y e s. In o r d e r t o c o m m u n ic a te w h a t t h e y w e r e s e n sin g , o u r a n c e s to rs cam e u p w ith th e a b s tr a c t id e a o f e v e ry th in g t h a t c o u ld b e s e n s e d an d la b e le d it th e p h y s ic a l. If b io lo g ic al o r g a n is m s d o ev o lv e, it is c o n ceiv ab le th a t t h e r e a r e p le n ty o f th in g s a r o u n d u s t h a t w e c a n ’t p e rc e iv e , b e c au se w e hav e n o t y e t e v o lv e d s e n s e s c a p a b le o f p e rc e iv in g th e m . It w ould be a v ery lim itin g m is ta k e to a s s u m e t h a t o u r c u r r e n t s e t o f s e n se s is c ap a ble o f p e rc e iv in g e v e ry th in g a ro u n d u s. T h e r e f o r e , it w ould b e in c o rre c t to a ssu m e t h a t a n y th in g is u n r e a l j u s t b e c a u s e w e c a n ’t s e n se it. You can b e t t h e r e will b e a n u p g r a d e d v e rs io n o f t h e h u m a n n e x t y e a r—o n e w ith air-co n d itio n in g —a n d a n o th e r t h e y e a r a f t e r t h a t , a n d so o n a n d so fo rth . Little by little, w e c r e a te s e n se s fo r w h a t w e c a n ’t y e t p e rc e iv e.
M any p e o p le view m in d a s a n o b je c t t h a t tra v e ls th ro u g h th e physi cal a n d se es w h a t is th e r e . B u t w h a t we e x p e rie n c e a s physical is inside th e m ind. O u r se n se s feed th e m in d w ith in fo rm a tio n a n d th e m ind cre a te s th e e x p e rie n c e o f th e physical fro m th a t in fo rm a tio n . T h e sa m e goes P h y sica l Re alitie s
for th e a s tra l. W h a t in sp ires us to c re a te th e ex p e rie n ce o f th e physical o r th e a s tra l is so m e th in g e n tirely d iffe re n t a n d nob o d y seem s to have a good idea o f w h at it is. T h e refo re , claim in g th a t a s tra l p ro je c tio n is an illusion (and th e re fo re n o t rea l) b e c au se it only h a p p e n s in th e m in d is a b s u rd . W h e re else w ould it ta k e p lac e ? R eality, p hysical o r a s tra l, is s o m e th in g we c re a te w ith in o u r m in d s, n o t s o m e th in g t h a t is se rv e d to us by so m e th in g e x te rn a l.
T h e N a tu r e o f t h e P h y sic a l
Too m an y p e o p le hav e v iew ed th e p h y sic a l a s th e only tr u e reality. T h a t o p in io n is c h a n g in g n ow b e c a u s e o f r e s e a r c h in q u a n tu m physics. Q u a rk s a re well k n o w n a s th e p a rtic le s t h a t b u ild th e n e u tr o n s a n d p ro to n s th a t in tu rn m a k e up th e a to m , w h ic h w a s lo n g a s s u m e d to b e th e indivisible b u ild in g b lo ck o f p h y sic a l m a tte r . P h y s ic is ts a r e n o w looking fo r th e b u ild in g b lo c k s fo r q u a r k s . T h e s e th e o r e tic a l b u ild in g b lo ck s a re n a m e d r is h o n s o r s tr a to n s b y s o m e . W h e n a n d if t h e y fin d th e s e p a rti cles, c h a n c e s a r e th e y will h a v e to s t a r t lo o k in g fo r t h e p a rtic le th a t m ak e s u p ris h o n s o r s tr a to n s . W h e n t h a t is fo u n d , t h e h u n t b e g in s for s o m e th in g e v e n s m a lle r. T h e r e s e e m s to b e n o e n d to h o w m a n y tim es w e c an d iv id e p a rtic le s in to s m a lle r d is c r e te c o m p o n e n ts .
T h e s e tin y p a rtic le s a r e s e p a r a te d by c o m p a r a tiv e ly v a s t d is ta n c e s of e m p ty s p a c e . T h e f a r t h e r d o w n w e lo o k in to m a t t e r , t h e m o r e s p a c e we fin d . A n a to m is n o t a so lid p a r t i c l e b u t a n e m p ty s p a c e in h a b ite d by n eu tro n s , p r o to n s , a n d e le c tr o n s . N e u t r o n s a n d p r o to n s a r e e m p ty sp aces in h a b ite d by q u a r k s . L ik e w ise , a q u a r k is n o t a s o lid p a rtic le , b u t an e m p ty s p a c e i n h a b ite d by r is h o n s . R is h o n s a r e a ls o m o s tly e m p ty sp ace, a n d so fo rth . E v e ry tim e w e d is c o v e r a n e w p a r tic le , it t u r n s o u t to be th e e ffe c t o f a s m a lle r p a r tic le lu rk in g in a v a s t s p a c e . In fac t, t h e r e is no p a rtic le to b e fo u n d , o n ly m o r e e m p ty s p a c e w ith t h e p r o m is e o f an ev en s m a lle r p a rtic le . T h e n a tu r e o f m a t t e r is a n e lu s iv e r id d le o f infinite e m p tin e s s .
W h e n ; w e o rig in a lly t h o u g h t t h e r e w o u ld b e b u ild in g b lo c k s, th e re is n o th in g . H ow c a n th is b e ? W h a t is th is th in g w e call m a t t e r ? How can ph y sical m a t t e r b e b u ilt f ro m n o th in g n e s s ? H o w c a n p h y sical m a tte r be s o m e th in g t h a t is n o t?
P h y sic a l Re alitie s W e a, 0r S i N i SseX
le reality
k s , ll,Cr'bl°‘ k ,cf"
An a n a lo g y t h a t c o m e s e a s ily to m e , p e r h a p s b e c a u s e I a m a s o ft w are e n g in e e r, is v irtu a l r e a lity . In s o f t w a r e , a v irtu a l re a lity is r e p r e sen ted by in fo r m a tio n a b o u t t h e w o r ld . T h e s o f tw a r e d o e s n o t c o n ta in the actual w o rld its e lf; h e n c e t h e w o r d v ir tu a l. O n e w ay o f lo o k in g a t it is th a t t h e r e is n o w o r ld in t h e s o f t w a r e ( o r a n y w h e r e e ls e ) , on ly ad escrip tio n o f t h e w o r ld . T h e d e s c r i p ti o n is t h e n u s e d to give t h e im p r e s sion o f an a c tu a l w o r ld . O f c o u r s e , h o w w ell th is im p r e s s io n is r e c e iv e d
d e p e n d s o n t h e p e r c e iv e r , t h e h u m a n c o m p u t e r u s e r. P e r h a p s th is is h ow the physical w o rld w o r k s a s w e ll.
M aybe t h e r e is n o p h y s ic a l w o r ld , o n ly a d e s c r ip tio n o f it. W h e r e th is d escrip tio n o f t h e p h y s ic a l w o r ld c o m e s f ro m , I d o n o t k n o w . P e r h a p s w e, as in d iv id u als o r g r o u p s , c r e a t e it c o n tin u o u s ly a s w e in te r a c t w ith o u r im p ressio n o f th e w o r ld . L ik e w ise , h o w w ell th is d e s c r ip tio n gives th e im p ressio n o f a n a c tu a l w o r ld d e p e n d s on th e p e r c e iv e r s —u s —or, r a th e r, ou r beliefs a n d e x p e c ta tio n s . P e r h a p s in c a s e s w h e r e o u r im p re s s io n o f the w o rld is f a lte r in g , w e s u b c o n s c io u s ly a d ju s t o u r d e s c r ip tio n o f th e w orld to m a k e i t m o r e c o n v in c in g . C o u ld t h e p h y sic a l u n iv e rs e b e a
d escrip tio n , a n e v e r-c h a n g in g b l u e p r in t, r a t h e r t h a n a n a c tu a l p la c e ?
B e h in d t h e s c e n e s lie s a n o n p h y s ic a l e n e r g y fie ld w e call th e a s tr a l. This field h a s n o f o rm , t a s t e , o r s o u n d . It d o e s n o t c o n fo rm to h o w w e believe a p r o p e r w o r ld s h o u ld a c t. It is sim p ly n e u tr a l n o n p h y sic a l energ y . T h e r e is n o th in g in it, e x c e p t t h e a b ility to c r e a t e a n y th in g . W e d raw e n e rg y f ro m th is fie ld in to o u r p e r c e p t io n . O n c e in o u r p e rc e p tio n , we m o ld t h e e n e rg y in to s h a p e s t h a t fit o u r d e s c r ip tio n o f th e w o rld . T h e rea lity b e h in d o u r p h y sic a l e x p e r ie n c e is a s u b je c tiv e e n e rg y form sc u lp te d by o u r in d iv id u a l m in d s .
T h e r e a r e a n in c o n c e iv a b le n u m b e r o f w ays to m o ld a s tr a l e n e rg y . If you h a p p e n to m e e t o t h e r b e in g s living in th e u n iv e rs e , you m ig h t find t h a t th e y lo o k a t t h e i r s u rr o u n d in g s in r a d ic a lly d iff e re n t w ays. T h ey do n o t s h a re o u r b e lie fs a b o u t h o w a w o rld sh o u ld look. T h ey hav e th e ir own beliefs a n d so m o ld n o n p h y sic a l e n e rg y to fit th o s e b e lie fs. T h e resu lt o f t h a t m o ld is w h a t th e y p e rc e iv e a s b e in g th e i r s u rro u n d in g s. For ex am p le, U FO o c c u p a n ts hav e b e e n r e p o r t e d to w alk th ro u g h walls, blink in a n d o u t o f view , a n d e n te r d re a m s . T h e ir view o f t h e w o rld evi d ently d o es n o t c o n ta in w alls a n d d o o rs o r ev en a d istin c tio n b etw e en w aking co n scio u sn e ss a n d sle e p in g c o n scio u sn ess.
M a tte r proves to be only on e o f m any ways of looking at. o r conceiv ing o f n onphysical energy. T h e only th in g th a t m ak es th is p e rc e p tio n of energ y special is th a t we as physical b ein g s (th e te r m we u se) have devel oped se n se s—eyes, e a rs , a n d so on —to a s sis t it. As w e have th e m ea n s to p erceiv e e n e rg y in th e p a rtic u la r w ay o f t h e p hysical, w e have m ad e th a t p e rc e p tio n o u r reality. H ad w e d e v e lo p e d s e n se s to m e a s u re e n erg y in so m e o th e r way, th e n th a t way w ould b e th o u g h t o f a s reality. R eality is in th e eye o f th e b e h o ld e r. Give th e b e h o ld e r a n a s tr a l eye a n d h e will a c ce p t th e a s tra l a s a re a lity to o . W h e re v e r w e go, high o r low, th ick o r d e n se, we ev en tu ally d ev elo p s e n se s t h a t allo w u s to g e t u se d to o u r su r ro u n d in g s e n o u g h to call it rea lity . T h is is b e c a u s e w e a r e nonphysical beings, a n d we c a n a d a p t to a n y fo rm o f re a lity w e c h o o s e to c re a te .
This tim e a ro u n d , w e h av e e x te n d e d o u r s e n s e s in o r d e r to in te ra c t w ith e n e rg y in a ph y sical way. W e h a v e c h o s e n to m a k e t h e ph y sical o ur c u rr e n t rea lity . P h y sical s p a c e h o ld s n o r e a l b o u n d a rie s fo r u s, e x cep t th e o n e s w e c re a te fo r o u rse lv e s. If w e b e lie v e m a t t e r is t h e on ly p ro p e r o r re a l w ay to p e rc e iv e e n e rg y , t h e n w e will n o t b e a b le to s e n s e e n erg y in an y o t h e r way.
It is o u r n a tu r e , h o w e v e r, to c o n s ta n tly c r e a t e n e w e x p e rie n c e s , a n d th e b e s t w ay to d o t h a t is to e x te n d in to u n k n o w n t e r r it o r i e s , including th e physical a n d th e a s tr a l. Y our w h o le c h ild h o o d w a s a lo n g p e rio d of g e ttin g u se d to y o u r e x te n d e d p h y s ic a l s e n s e s . You a r e n o w e x te n d in g y o u r s e n s e s to e x p e rie n c e e n e rg y in a n a s tr a l w ay . It w ill r e q u i r e tim e a n d e ffo rt b u t will b e w ell w o r th it. You will n o t s to p w ith t h e a s tra l, th o u g h . You will n e v e r c e a s e to e x p a n d y o u r s e lf in th is m a n n e r . You will n e v e r s to p e x p lo rin g n e w h o riz o n s .
Astral Projection a n d th e N ature o f Reality
tioO 11i's '
/ f phvsicSii a p l