*
eoMMrsstoN
oF
THE
EUROPEAN
COMMUNIilES
ti
fifAR
d
lg30
co!r(ze) 557
rinar
rq|}
E$$,s_tssr
a^issers,
lzth
'ctober
1e7ef*-^.e
hrr
,
.lrt*.
'OWl
"esd.4'
? ?
I
A,
AT{NI'AL ECONOIIIC REPORT 1979180
il
*
final-II
::-rf,
'.
' .
\cotrtMtsst0N
OF THE
EUBOPEAIII f,OMMUIUilTS
(1) ArticIe
4Dec i sion
of
Decision 74/120/EEC
of
18 February 75/787|EECof
18 December 1975.d
.!,: i...:
lhe
Commissionrs ilroposed "AnnuaI Economic Report"for
1glg-g1is
submittedto
the
communityinstitutions in
accordancervith
theCouncif's'1974 Decjsion
(1)for
attainmentof
a
high
degr";
;;
"onu"._
gence
of
economicpoLicies
of
MemberStates.
The counciL.is
requ.iredin
the fourth quarter
of
each year-
on proposaLof
the
commirJionand
after
consuLting ParLiament andthe
Economic and SociaL Committee-to
adopt an annuaLreport
onthe
economicsituation in
the
co0munityand
to
set
economic poLicyguidetines
to
be toL[owedJy
"".fr-rrt"rO..'
Sta t e.
As
[ast
year
the
comrnission has'aLso prepared, asa
separate background documentto
the
I'AnnuaL Economic Report"t etr
"AnnuaI EconomicReview'! -which
contains'a
more detaiIed factuat
anaLysisof
econoinic trendsand
the outtook
for
the
y€an'ahead.This
second documentis
submittedto
the
CounciL, ParIiament and Economic and SociaL Comm.itteefon
information.AnnuaL Economic Report 1979-BO
Fo rewo rd
Cont en t s
1.
Economic Prospects and Qbjectivesfor
1980?.
Principtes
for
PoLicyat
the
Community LeveL3.
the
trlaintines
of
PoLicy4.
PoL'icyin
the
Member States5
.
Conc Lus ion*
h-1974, amended by
I
Provi.ionrl sdclroti: Rua.lrlr Loi 200,.8-1O49.Brussers.-- Teleohone 735 O0.40i 7358040 - T.l.gr.phic .ddr.is: "COMEUR 8ruis.l."
*
1,- gFonqnfc PrrosPeats
.
,-This
ReportiS
principaLLy concerneduith
the
policies
r'equiredfu,r
t:he: European Communityto
cope.in
the
year aheadxit-h the
unfavourabtetrlf,n
i,rlths internationat
'economicenvironment-Taking
into
account,the.,risein
the
price
of oiL'in
the past
txeLve ngnths andthe current
recessionirt
the
North American econonyras-velt
ars
the
BtaRy' unr€sotved domestic economic probtems .in tlember States,erpeetations
for
1980 haveto
berelatively
modest'
Ttteessentibl features"of
the
economicforecasts
to
'1980, as dravnrrp
by
the
eommissionare given
in
Tabte 1.The Community can aim
for
a
continued moderate GDP volumegronth
in198U
of
about?
1
2to
3Zin
the
majority
of
MemberStates, nhich,
takinginto
aqcsunt,theliketyireaker
performanceof
someothers'
would makea ;
-
.'C6suntrnjty a.verage
of
about22. This
comparesrrith
an averagegrouth
ra'te
:of
a
tittle
over 3Z uhich was experienced,or is
nowforecast,
for
both.
1976 and 1979.
t
The
oiL price
rise of
about 6O7in
the tvelve
rnonthsto
June 1978meafls
for
the
Community asa
whole aninitiaL
defLationary
impactof
theorder
of
0.7%of
GDP, mounting perhapsto
1Uafter
a
yeartaking
into- accountvarious
secondaryeffects.
The sLower GOP grorrth
forecast
for
1980 meansthat
the
grouth of
totaL
empLoymqnt being experiencedin
1979is tikety
to'be arrested.
Uith '
:the
cond.inuedrise in
the
populationof
working agehy
O.5%in
1980),uf,-empLoyment
is
Likely
to
rise
again somewhatin
the
Comrnunity asa
nho,te)a[thougti r+ot
in a[t
]lemberStates-
Therealistic
objective
for
1980 shsuLdbe
to
maintaina
significant
momentumof'growth,
avoidinganything
tike
t}terecession uhi,ch
the
Community experiencedin
1974-75, whichled
to
a'
doubL'ingof
the rate
of
unempLoymentThe impact on
the
price
Ievet is
very
significant,
especiaLly uhen
the
increasein
aLL energyprices
is
taken
into
account:an increase
in
consumerprices
of
2
to
?
1/2'Ais
the
averageeffect in
theCommunity,
uithout,
however, making any aLLowancefor
secondaryinftation
' ..1-.
?.-t
TABL E
The Community economy 1 973-80
GDP
vo Lume
g row th
% Rise
in
consufner prices 'lCurrent ,
a c count
ba[ance
of
payment s
r000 miLLion
EUA
G enera I
government financiaL
deficits
7" GDP Money suppLyg rowth
NzlN3
%
Unemp Loyed
in
L abou
r
forc e
r
1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 19781979 (1)
1980(1)
6r0 1r6
-1
,6
5rO 213 311 311 2 8r4 13.4
12 rB
11,1 1O,5 618 819 9 1)1 -9 15
0,8'
-6rZ 112 14rO -313-5
1/4-017 -117 -5 16 -3r'g -313
'4r0
-4 ra
-319
16,5
2,512,8
2rg1?,7
4,31?,5
4,917,3
5,31?,7
5 151A,9
5,6
1p
1/?
6,2(1)
forecasts
of
the
Commissfonstaff
on
the
Sasisof
poLicies
present
or
anticipated
t
effects
(throughthe
pnice-bragespirat)
which haveto
betimited
to
the minimum. Theprice effects wiLl
,be work'ingtheir
way through mainLy inthe
second haLfof
1979- Unauoidably the'yea.-on-yeanrate
of
infLation
is'
inqreasedin
1979 and 1980.to
about92,
cornparedto
the
lowpoint
of
iust
under 77. achievedin
1978. Theobjective
shou[dLimit the
temporary
1rise jn
the
averageinftation
rate
to
no more thart27
andto
reestablish.x.
a
deceteratingtrend
in
the
courseof
1980,
The Community-"has.aspecial
i
.interest in
seeinga
rapid
reversaLof
the
recent
tendencyfor fnflation
rates
to
begin againto
divergeThe
current
account of.the
balanceof
paymentsof
the
Communityis at
presentdeteriorating,
andthe
outconefor
1979 and1980
is
IikeLyto
bedeficits of
the order
of
3
1/4 to 5
1t4
biLlion
EUA,by
comparisonwith the substantial
surptusof
14biLtion
EUA recordedin
1978. Thismovetnent
refIects the
infLuenceof
boththe
changing reLat'ive cycLicalposition
of
the
European and United States economies andthe
increased pr.iceof oiL
(uhich
increasesthe
Community'soiI biil.
by
some 20biLLion
EUA).,The
current
accountof
&lember Sta.tes couldwelI
continueto
deteriorate
untiL the
endot'1979,.but a
spontaneous recovery should become apparentif,
in
the
courseof
1980 as OPEC imports increase and reLat'ivecycLicaI
trendsbecome Less
divergent.
The balanceof
paymentsdeterioration
hasfor
thetime
beingto
be accepted,subiect
to
the
speciaI
position
of
certain
Member.
States,
and to.recognition
of
the
overriding
prionity to
str'engthenenefgy
policy
so asto
reduce dependenceon
importedoit.
The Community
'is
facedwith
twosets
of difficuLt
structural
economic problems. The
first is
the
compLexof
issuedLinking
productivity
-trends,
employmentpolicy
andindustriaI
poLicy.
The second concerns energyTogether
the
handlingof
these issues wiLL bequite
as
fundamdntat tofuture
performanceof
the
Community economyin
termsof price
stabiLity
and growthas
issuesof
short-term
economic strategy,A number
of
factors
suggestthat
past
Long-nunproductivity
trends,for
examptethe
4.37. annual average experiencedin
the
Communityin
1960-73,uli L L
not
berestored
in
the
f oreseeabLe f uture. t^lhile
on baIance averageproductivity
growth'is
LikeLyto
be Lower,the
contriburing factors are
nothe[pful
to
employment. Thequantity
of
work availabLeis in
no wayfixed
#
and increasing.prod^uct.ivityis
requ.iredto
dampen the
inflation,
andto
makefor
a
favourable combination ofand moneta
ry
stab i L i ty .4.-rise of
costs
andgrowth,
empLoymentIn
industry there
is
the
needfor
cont'inuing adaptat'ionto
newp-atterns
of
demand and new. manufactqi'ing technoLogies. progressin
manufacturing'industry has
to
comebrith
exposureto
compet'ition, and prof .itabiL i
ty
toervention
in-favour
of
sectorswith
decLining demand must be Lim'itedto
heLping assure anorderty
andsociaLIy
acceptabLerestructuring
and reductionof
capacity.WhiLe
the trend
in
the
numberof
personsdirectLy
empLoyedin
manufact-uring
is
untikeLy
in...mostcountries
(thoughthere
should be exceptions) toabs,orb much:of,
the
present unemployment,a
competitive manufacturing sectoris
both
fundamentaLto
the
Communityrsprosperity
and econonic strength,and
to
the
prospects morebroadly
for
emp[oymentgrowth,
for
exampLe throughi.ts
impacton
reIated
servicg
sectors.
Moreovercertain
growth sectorsshould see
a
manked increasein
empLoyment,notably'in
energy-reLatedindustries.
In
the
tertiary
sector
there.ig
muchgreater
scopefor
employmentgrowth, as
witnestui
Oytrends
everywhere (incLudingthe
United Stateswhere
trends
have gonefurther
than
in
Europe), andby
the
continujng
growthin
Latent demand and suppLy. Growthis
persistentLy strong
for
heaLth,education,
traveL,
Leisure and;sociaLservices,
aLthoughthere'is
alsoincreasing
concernover
the
quaL'ityof
pubLic services.Greater
indigenous energy production and conservationis
notla
vitaLmacroeconomic
objective,
without
whichthe
prospectsfor
non-infLationary giowthare poor
indeed., Forthe
short-run
and medium-termo'il
ceiLings
havebeen
set
by
the
Commun'ity (500million
tons
fqr
consurnption in
1979, and472
niLLion tons
of
importsin
1985). The evidence suggeststhat
theseobject-ives
can be achieved by breakingthe past association
betweenthe
growthof
domeStic product ando'iI
use,
althoughthe
f eas'ibLe ex-tentof
th'is
changein
trend
js
sti
t Lthe
subject
of
considerabteuncertainty,
To achieve
a
moderate growthrate in
Community GDPin 19E0, and to respondaIso to
these
issuesof
structurat
deveL.opment,there
is
a
vitaLr
te
i nves tment i nc L ud i ngstockbuiLdi.ng.
t,lhite
thesevariables are
difficuLt to
predict
at all
exactLy,1n 1980 soc€
cecline
,in i're
hou.sehotdsav'irqrs'ratic
r*ouLd bedeg{a-#.{ez
sc
a"sra'il-;.1
'.;:r;iq rgzl
denandnithorrt
incrreasing'costs artdthe$c€
prices-
Fcr th'-;.
+-:3 ::y i:?1:}ab'-e,infLatiOn
expectations need verys€,$#.tg.be eat.meci
dorn,
;qc :hi'-
requires
confidencein
the
objectiVes-v
s{
ecorrcm'i'cpoticy-trmrestmen,t, incLucing
stackbuitding,
is
typieatty the nost votatiIe
conpdlent
of
the
businesscycle:
tn
1975 investment feLL 5Zin
voluae terns fuF'the.eomunity asa rhote, uhite the
runniqg dornof
stocks alsnecqntributgd
2T,'to
the
cjectineof
GDP- Theindicators
at
presentare
not"uyr{ayrdurab.te- Investm€nt
activity
has been strer"igtheningin
1979, arrd.foreea,sts and ,surveys sug{lest continued b-uoyancy
in
198Oin
the
Communityas
a uhote.
As regardsstocks,
h.rsiness surveys shovthat their
tevel
hascont'i'nued
to
degl-ine'throughoutthe
past lE
nonths,
rhich
m€ansthat
thereysu1d seep.
to
bea
LorrprobabiLity
of a
running dovnof
stocks'
asstningh
investrnent andstock-that other
econonic behaviour rema'ins sound. Botbrri'td{ng. houever,
:slsrhighLy
sensitive
to
the
f inancia[.condition
of
theen:terprise
sector
-
bo,thas
regards profitabiIity
andaviitabiti.ty
of
er:edit.
Th,esefactors
in
turn
are
goingto
dependgreatty
on vhether,househotds
in
the
next
year accept-
throughthe
deveLoprnentof their
-flon:ina"l irncorles
-
the
termsof
trade toss
imposed bythe
oit pr'ice
:ri,s.e; o.r yhether
they
seekto shift.this
loss
to
the enterprise
sector
:o.r
to
Eovernment.rs f inances through compensatory rage ctaims,?.
Pri.nciptesfor
Poticy
at
the
Cgnr$unityLevet
'.It is
the particutan role
of
the
Communityto identify
the,commonprobtems
that
cannot be sotvedadequately'at
the nationat
[eve[,
andto
w:Ork
out the
cOncerted responsethat
cangive the
betten
resutt'
iThe Cornmunity has ernbarked upon
a
neh, venturein
the
Europeanillgheta.ry- Systemr which has heLped provide over
the
tast
hatf-year
a. much neededstabiLity in
intra-Comnrunity excharge-rates,as.wett
as
in
September'anefficient
procedurefor a
timited
adjustmentto
centraLparities.
The,.s
i,*
t-;.' . . .6.-€XChange-rate
stabiIity
pnovidedby
the
system needsto
be extended beyondthe
currentLypartic'ipating countries,
for
exampLe.by deve[op'inga
concertedpol'icy
aLongwith the
United States towardsthe
doLLar.r
In
the period
aheadin
whichthe
batanqeof
paymentseffects
of
the
newoil price rise
haveto
be absorbedthe credit
mechanismsof
thea
means
of
assuringsol.idarity
betr"/een MemberStates.
(|'lithout
pret.endingthat
atLegianceto
a
systemof
exchange-rate stabiL'ity, itseLf
subject
to
al.t
the
tensionsthat
divergencein
econoqicpol.icies, the
European Monetary System providesa
frameworkfor
the
construct-ion
of
a set
of
short-
and medium-termpoLicies,
which whiLe inevitabLy modutatedto
the particuLar
circumstances preva'iLingin
each Member State,pre-s.ent
together
a
coordinated approechto
tackl.ing
these probtems.In
the
presentsituation a
concerted responseis
caILedfor
according
to
which Member States shouId movetogether
through two successiveL
phasesof
poLicy.
Thefirst
and immediate need,given
that
the
o'iLprice
I
rise
be fULLy communicatedto
the
consumer,;is to
preventa
secondary increasein
the rate
of inf[ation.
This meansthat in
the period
from nowto
aboutei
ther
th nough Lower reaL
i ncome c La'im's orthrough
a
teniporary adjustmentto the"fuL[
'r"lorking-of indexation mechanisms(the
detaiLs
of
course wouldvary
here bycountry).
This
done,the
European-
Monetary System wi I L serveto re;fforce
the
def encesagainst
moneta-lydivergences.
.Thus should be recreated
a certain
roomfon
manoeuvrefor
a
secondphase
of
poLicy.
ControI over monetary.:aggregates.shouLd bekept
steadiLyto
presen.tstrict
pgLie'ies,
but
it
may become poss'ib[e anddesirable,
asinfLation
expectationsare
abated,to
movein
the
courseof
1980to
moresupportive budgetary
poLicy,
if
aLso investment and consumption were weaker,
thqn expeeted. Thepoticy-mix could-atso
in
such aneventuaLity,
or to
.'some
extent
aLie,r'natively,. incIudea
de-escaLationof interest
rates.The judgement$
on
these issues,-andthe
possibLepoticy
adjustmentsto
folLow, woutdrequire
a strongIy
concertedarticu[ation.
,:.'
A
further
immediate, and'unconditionat requirementis
the strengthbningof
ener,gy poLi'cy ,inthe
Communjtf -
The 1985 oit
jmport-
ceiLings agreedin
Juneat
Strasbourg havein
September been specified.:in
moredetpiL.
Progressis
now requi'redto
impLement theseobj,ectives
'rby"
setting
into
motionthe
profoundstructuraL
devetopmentsin
theproduction and saving
of
energy by governrnents,enterprises
and househofds.. The p.lrice mechanism must be
put
powerfulLyto
workat
the, Lev,e,t of ,energy.
!jsers,
r+hiLe Governments shoutdtake
the
Leadwith
investment programmesand
incentives
to
the
private
sector.At the
Community,[evel
there
are -a number"offurther
poLicy." inst"ruments ava i labLe. .In pa,rti
cu[ar the
Community Is
i nstrumentsof
"structuraL
poticy
are
growingwith
increasing budgetaryintervention
.,through
the
sociaL Fund,
EAGGF (Guidance sectlon),
and RegionaL Fundand
in
the
dornainsof
industry
and energy, as aLsowith
increasing, .Ioan f inancingfor
.investme:nt. throughthe
European rnvestment Bank,and
the
Commissionrs.Euratom, ECSC and new investmentfinancing
faciIities:
Thesevarious financing
activities
are
entirety
d,irected towardsthe ,
rpriority
requirement5 of "the economicsituation;
empLbymentr'industriaL
'apd
infrastructura['investment
and energy deveLopments.il
8.-3.
main Linesof
PoLicyItlonetary
poLicy
has animportant
ccuhter-ihfIationary
roLeto
pLay.For 1979
it
seemsLikely
that
monetarypoLicy
witL
succeedin
bring'ingclown
the rate
of
growthof
rnonetany expansionto
about 11 1/2% on averagein
the
Community, whichis
aboutthe
sameas
the
rate
of
growthof
nomrnaLgross domestic
product. This refLects a
morerestrictive
generaL stanceof
poLicyby
comparisonwith
1978 when,inthe interests
of
helping
restimu.are growth, mon-ey suppLy waspermitted
to
groh,about
1312-
nearLy
27/, taste?than
nominatgross
domestic product.The
target
rates
of
monetary expansionfor
1980 shouLdbe
kepteither
Lower,or at
the
mostnot
higher
than
thoseset for
1979. Exceptfor certajn
cases wherea
continuing
trend
decreasein
the veLocity
of
cincuLation
is to
be expected,the rate
of
monetary expansion shouLd bea.imed
at
s[ightLy tess
than
that of
nominaLgross
domesticproduct,so
asto
s'ignaL, and indeedto
work towardsa
deceleration trencj
in the rate
of
inflation in
the
counseof
1980. Forthe
Communityas
a
whoLe money suppLymight
(on the
basis
of
Commissionestimates,
assuiningcontinuation
of
existing poLicies)
beconstrained
to
a
grourthof
'10 1t?%-
sLight[y
beLowthat
projected
for
nominaL gross domesticproduct
(11
1/4D.
NominaL
interest.rates
may haveto
remainhigh by
historicaL
stand-ards
to
permit
a sufficient
non:nonetaryfinancing
of
pubLic
deficits.
'When
inftation is
seento
be ona
deceLeratingtrend
again,-it
wouLd bedesirab[e
to
Lowerinterest
rates
soas
to
stimuLate investment and easethe
debt
service
burdenon
the
pubLicfinances;
Afl eventuaL de-esca[ationof interest
nates woutdbe,
typ,icaLLy,the task
of
concertedpoLicy
movesacross
the
Comnunity;the
needfor
improvedcoordination
in this.fieLd
has been heightenedby
the
operations
of
the
European Monetary System,r;'s*;: f
.i
I
t
,
i
*
fr
t
t
Budgetary poL_icy r{as expansionary
in
both 1978 and 19V9,the
financ.iat
":
def
.icit of
generaLgovernment in
the
C mmunity a$a
whoLe. having risen,successively
frorn 3,3Xof
GDFtn
19V7to
4.02
in
1978and'in
1979It is
nowdesirable,to
move ,intoa
phaseof
fal'ting
publjc
deficits
relative
,i
..
, to
GDp/ so asto
heLp aL Ioi,rthe
sh'ift of
savings 'in pr:i.vate invqstment,and
rto
reducethe
public
finances'
contri but:ionto
monet,ar.y expansion.But
;the extent
of
these reductions
shoutd be var.ied by country ac.cordinstp
t
-
severaLcrjteria:
the
strength
or
weaknessof
econom'i.cactivity,
the,,
size
to',which publ.'ic
deficits
have grownover
recent yearsr..,the extent:.to
which infLationar.y expectations remainLive,
consistencywith
mone'tary'poL-icy'object'ives and
the
urgencyof
the
need to,.sh'ift
resourceutiLiaation
frorn pubL
ic to
pl.ivate sectors
for
reasonsof
batanceof
payment'sconstr'ai'nt9
'
,".-.or to
strengthenthe
directly
productive baseof
the
economy. The m'ixof
these
criteria
Ieadto
a
rangeof
desirable
outcomes, betweelr reductions.i
n
the
gov€rnmen.! defic'it
asa
shareof
GDP'in
some cases(for
exampLeGermany,
'Iretandr'ItaLy,
the
Nethertands.,the
United Kingdom);to their
:
,i.:.approximate
stabitity
'in
someothers.
Forthe
Community asa
whotethe
financiaL ,':
':
deficit of
generaI governmentis Iikety'to
decLine from 4.0%of
GDP' i.n 1979.
to
3.9% .in 1980;the
borrowing requirenrentof
central
governments uoutd'in
\ -;gengral nove
in a
sim,ilar
direction
(atthoughthe
Comrnunity averageis
*
expected
to
remainstable,in
termsof
GDP share becauseof
sone exceptiqnat'financ
iaL
transactions)This
evotution
is
appropriate onthe basis
of
the
underLying macro-economicobjectives
andforecasts.
However/ budgetary poL'icy hasto
retain
.its
automatic'contracycLicatfunction,
irhich meansthat'
if
the rate
of
growthof
econornicactivity
werefaster
than
forecast,
the
pubL'icdeficits
shouLdreduce by
a
greater
margin, andif
economicactivity
should be weaker, pubticdeficits
uoutdturn out
to
begreater.
It
wouLdnot
beappropriate
asof
nobr, as
a
responseto
the
ef fects
of
the
oit
price
rise, to
return
to
a .phaseof
generaL, unconditionatrefLation
through budgetary poL'icy, becauseof
theconstraints
atready mentioned. However,there are
cond'itioqsin
uhi'cha
rnoreactive
budgetary poLicy could becomeappropriate
in
198A,notab(y
in
circum-stances
rhere thi
s
couldhelp
estabt i sh f i rmer and Less 'inf Lationary
grobith(see
further
betowjn
retation
to
incomebargaining)"
and r.lherethis
was,consistent
reiththe
object'ivesof
monetary:'
ii_
a
'lt *
10. _
Incgme bargaining behaviour. wi L
L
'in
the
year aheadcarry a
major
resporrsibi
t'ity for
determ'in'ing whetherthe
present economic d'if ficulties
can bE il'bsorbed
without
damagingthe
prospectsfor
continu'ing economicprogress.
0ver
the
Last
eighteen months,the
evoLutionof
wage incomes hason average
in
the
Community, thoughthere
ane exceptions, heIped thedeceferation
of inf[ation
recorded,in
1978 and hassince then
in
mostcountries
avoided aggravat'ingthe acceteration
of
infLation
(which wasdu.e
in
substantiaI
measureto
a deterioration
in
the
termsof
trade
thusnot
taarranting compensatgry wage cLaims). The nominaL growthof
hour[yhi-ages
in
the
Community asa
whole EvoLvedas
foltows:
1?7"in
1977, 11% in1978 and 10%
in
the
secondquarter
af
1979 over oneyear
earLier..
Seen
in
a
meijium=terrn pet"spective, . however,there
is
sti
LI
at"tay
to
gobefore
the relat'ive
sharesof
wage and saLaried income on theone hand and
that of
the
enterprise sector
onthe
other, are
restored
to LeveIsthat
may be considered-normalfor
the
stimuLationof
productive
andemdt,oyment
creating
investment.In
the
first
'instancethe sociat
partnershave
to
agree- in
eachcountry
in'its
particuIar
sett'ing as
regards thenature
of
wagecontracts
andnegotiating practises
- to
Limit
to
the
m'inimumthe
repercussionof
energyprice
rises,into
incomes.In
counLries withfixed
wagecontracts;
this
means. not'seekinS to. renegotiate them beforetheir'normal expiny.
In
countries
with
comprehensive andrapid-acting
wageindexation mechanisms
it is
necessaryeither to
withhoLd paymentof
somepart
of future
indexation adjustments. so asnot
Lo pass onthe
recent.energy
price
rises, or
aLternativeLy,
to
make equivaLent reductlons incLaims
for
.reaI purchasing power increases. TheseprincipLes are
beingrespected
in
some MemberStates/
but
probLems rernainin
other
countriesw'ith wage indexat'ion
practises*
Thesedifferences are
dangerous, sincethey
risk
Leadingto
a
renewed divergencein
reLative infLation
trendsbetween Member States
In
the
period
ahead neaL wage increaseg shouLd be nearto
zero
inthe
Comrnunity on average: maintenanceof
purchasing'powerbut
hardLy more.As between Member,states thene
wilL
bea
rangeof.justifiabte
outcomesaround
this
average, depending upon recentproductivity
performance,tfre-financiat position
of
the
enterprise
segtor and onthe
degreeof
price
r'
a
s
Behaviour'atong ihese
Iines
wirt
permit
a more continuousadvance"in
reAt
economicgrorth
and bett-er emptoyment prospects ,than trouLd '.1'otherwise be
the
case.Faiture
to
adjust
in
this
uayto
thee,nergy
price
shock. uoutd.ron.past experiencelead
to-a
much more.:d,isagreeab[e,resu t
t
,i
in
servicesof
the videst'range,
thite stitL
aimingat
high
productivity
performanpa in'manufagtr:ringindustr:y.
The.roteof
goverruent
nust
beto
.:''favour those trends.through
its
tabour market,industriat
and regiona-LpoLicies,
.al.thoughthere are'csnstnaints .(notabty
budgetary) onthe
extent
towhich governments.' shoutd
directLy
intervene
in
tdbour,narkets.
fn
the
past
,'three years
the
scateof dirett
enptoyment measures by governments hascons,iderably increased. The number
of
,persons benefitting
f romfour
maincategories,ofmanporenpoticyintervention(enpLoytrrentcreationsubsidies'
uorkergeri.efice.prograil'nes'pub{'*cSector.jobcreationprograomes;.,6nd.i.,
enp{oyrqent naintenshce:ltfbsures) has increased f
ron
an est.imated 1-4^'
,.
',rnittion
personin
1976to
2.1 niLLion
in
1977 andfurther
in
19ZBfor
theCogmunity as
a
uhote..These measuresare
of
s'ignificant size
in
retation
,to the
numberof
registered
r.lnernpL6yment:
,
,, ltith
the
persistenceof
high
unemp[oymentin
atmost aLLthe
membercountries
andthe
prospectof
anacceteration
in
the
grouthof
the
tabour supptyin
the next
five
to
ten
years,
proposalsto
step.upcuts
in
uorkinghou'rsortoextendyork-shar.ingh:avebecomgamajqrtopicjndi,scussions.
on labour market
poLicy.
Thereis
no wayof
sayingwith certainty
how great t'hashort-
and tonger-term employmenteffectiof
cuts in,uorking
hour.s llouLdbe-
Cutsin
working hoursare
not a
qu'ick-acting panacea,nor
canthey
be asubsti.tute
for
generaI growth and adjustrnentpoLicies.
one shoutd envisage-
uithout,
houever/ aggravatingthe
costsof
enterprjses
-
sornestrength-ening
of
the
tong-termtrend.in the
reductionof
annuaI r"lorking hours(the
working weekor
hoLidays), atongsideother
formsof
work-shar.ing(schemes
for
eartier
and fLexibLeretirement, part-time
working,
reducedover-tirne) and
the
devetopmentof
a
r,l'iderarray
of
vocationat
training
and further tra'ining
schedute.I
-'fi
,
Si'.",,,
la'
4.
PoL'icyjn
the
Member StatesIn
Denm-ark,the
risk
exists
of
a
further
s'ignificant
worseningin
thecurrent
baLanceof
paymentsdefjcit in
tqaO asa
resuLt
of
the
cieterioratjone the
recent
adjustmentof
the
Krrre.i
n
theEuropean Monetary System, econbm'ic growth wiLL remain
subjected o
"
piurring
*xternaL
constraint. In
these circumstances,officiaL
act.ion tni. L needto
aimprimari
ty at
ensuringa
Lasting moderationin
costSr p€rrticuLari.y;n
order
tocutain
an improvementin
the
baLanceof
payments. This
meanstnl.
rhe growth-iri incomes
in
1980 shouLd beconsiderabLy
Lowerthan
in
precec ri)g/eors
im-ptying
a
s{naILerrise
than not'l expectedwithin the
frameworkof
exist.ing
agreements.Even af
ter' the
increasein
'indirect
taxat'ion
andthe
reduct'ionrn
pubLic expenditurerjecided Last June,
the
generaL government borrowing requir€ment couLdrise
fromits
teveLof
1%of
GDPin
1979to
2Hof
forecasted GDpin 1980. rt
coutd becomeReccssary
to
reducethis deficit
unLesith: rise in
incomesis
Lowered substant.ialty"- To pro',ride room f
or
f inancing-the
increased baLanceof
payments def rcit
andma.in-Jaining
pthe
krords pos'ition
onforeign
exchange markets, monetary Jt llvrtv' poLicy wi wrl\LL have"to
eontinueto
beaimed
at
keeping,'interest
rates
high
andmaintaining
strict
con-trots
on tending.*'l
(
t a-
-.a---..,.{-*A- :
:'l'' _
.
.tathe
Federa{. Repr,ibtic
of
'Germa*y,the Gwtrrmentrs
sti*LltatetT'
prograffigs
that
roere adopted mainLy.in
1978 haveset in
mst.iwta
vigorous-i-- r---. :- l-^:.* .
e'ga611g"lc Lpsuing
drich"
to arl'iacreisirrg
d*,gree,;is
beirq
ufderpinned bythe
en&geng[rs expanrsiornr^yforces
in
the
econoBy,notabty
invest*eot-
rTfu.edevel.rye*rtot€G9to}*snthasshouaamfefayor.lrabte.trerdtharrgas"
expect.ed.
at
the
beginrriog of,tlp
year-
Tfieseresutts
can bepartty
attilibuted
'
.to
dee ided{.y aoderate ilage settlements-lftite
the
price
ctimate
hasdeterisrated,
this is
largety
dueto
tfre
rise in
the
price
of oit.ard
to
the
irreneasein
value-addedtax
uhich toofteffect
on1st Juty
{979 tth€
erdedasanediL*nF-terGchar*geintaxstructune)-The|.eadirg]
eeorpmic
i:rdicators
suggestthat,
despite
a
stou dounin
the
csurse
,ofthe
year, the
f,anoc.rrabteeconeiic s,ituation
vil.t
cont'inueinto
198{t-Thi.seeansthat.sooeredtrcionin,thefinanciatdeficitofthepubtic
authoriti€s
asa
yhotefros
the fevet
of
3Z GDP foreseenfor
1979' can..o-l'aim af
be enrlisaged
next year-
l{onethetess,the
risk of
a
oarhed neakerring of,ecc{lssric
activity
rexains-
f,sidefnm
uncqrtainties
onthe Fxport side,
internat
dercand,in
particr.rtar
private
consunpt'ionrccutd s{orsdoun
'
.'t.sign.ificantty.
If this
ueredistinctty
more pronotmced thanat
presentf
expeeted
tfte
govenrffient ccutdbriAg
f,ortard
certain
reduct'ionsof persof}at
I
a,income
tax, at
pr€sent pLarrredfsr
the
begirxringof
19E1-In
the
fietd
of
nonetaryandcreditpo[icy,the&.lndesberrkhassign'ificaatlyreinedback
thegrotthgfthemgry€yslryptyin1979..Asaresu|t,thegrorthrate
of
tfre centrat
bank mneystock
is at
presentconsistent
uith
the
target
.setbyt}'le8undesban|rattheendCI1,[astyear.Inthecoisingy€artoo'
lh.
target f,sr
tfueErorth
of,tlre
*oney suppty should be suchttrat
the
scope
'
. ,'1,fordomesticpriceincreasesiskept,'r.rithinnarrg'U|.-imits.Suchapoticy
.stance shoutd pake
it
easier
for
the
s.sciatpartn€rs
to
coaci-udenoderate
,".twage
settleaents,
an indibpensabtecondition
for
haLancedgrorth
ouerthe
next
-In
France, economicpoticy
remainsoriented
towardsstructurat
reform.
Thehigher
contr"ibutions introducedin
order
to
put
sociat: .
security
ona
sounderfooting
have been combinedwith rather
strict
centrat
government budget management.At the
sametine,
the
underpinning1,
of
economicactivity, for
the
end of_1979 and the'beginning
of
1980, has.
groups.This
overatt
stance shoutd be prolongedinto
1980in
order
topermit
grobrthto
continueat
an adequate LeveL and sothat
external:
lrade
can bekept
ctoseto
equitibrium
(despite
the deterjoration'in
the termsof
trade
observedin
1979 andexpected.for
1980);the
State
budgeton an execution
basis
shouLd be suchthat, in
1980,the net
borrowingteading
to
a stab.iIisation
of
the net
borrowing requirementof
pubLic:
administration.s.l,lith a
combinationof
a
moderationof
economii growth..
andcontinuing
increasesin
productiv'ity, the increase'in
employment wiIL:.
slow downin
1980: Moreover, dueto
the
sharp increasein
the
number ofr
a
personsentering
the
tabour marketfor
the
first
time,
ahdin
spite
of
themeht
is
to
be expected.This
increase;createsthe
risk
of.a
rise
in.the
savings
r:atio'which
couLd impLya
marked sLoudownin'the
evoLutionof
reat---ir\
'
pr.ivate
consumption. SimiLarly, the ri
sein
interes.t rates,
necessit:tedby exchange
rate objectives,
coutdif
they
continueput
a
brake on thepropensity
to.'invest,
whichis
aIreadyquite
slugg'ish.
In thi3
hypothesisi-end
of
August 1g7g,to
support economicactivity,
evenif this
Led to+ !L
i
,grohrthin
the
budgetdeficit. In
other
respectsr.in
ordqr
to
reduceinf[a-l
tionary
pressures,'it
r.rouLd be advi sabL'e;not
onty
to
pursuea
poLi cy ofm6deration on nominaI ineomes
but also
to
restore free
competit'ion in*'
atL branc.hesof
the
economy, incLudingin
particutar the
services
sector.'z
,,
Restructuringof
the
economyriLL
atso
haveto
be sought through aL'im'itation
in
the
subsidies grantedto
the
nationaLised companies. The. .,
. oveiaLl
aim of, monetarypo[icy
wiL.L continueto
bethe
stabitity of
the:r
.franc.
Toth'is
end,the
present
[evel
of
Liquid'ity
of
the
economy shouLdi,,
beheld
steadyor
even reduce{t:.
..t
i,t..{.
'^
.,
In
lreLand,
gfouth"nitt
remainno{erate
in
,X,*80,,ouing,to a 'st'ouei'expansion':of
domestic,demand:arid desp{te an,ant-icipated improvementin
the
perfonnance,of',
:'agr.icu-#ural
exports;
The init'iaL', impar:t,of dearer irirported ra"w matexiaks;is
)tiabte
to
bearnplified by
the
autsmatic.effect
of
lage indexatioh
t,htchuit't
have unfavourabte consequences
on,job
creation
and teadto
a deterioration
in
ul.--employment, given
the rapid rise'isr
the
Labourfotce.
In
addition, the
worseningof
tlre ba[aneeof
paymentsdeficit
uitL
pro,veto
bea
raajor constraint"'on ec,ononicpolicy.
T.hlls*.budgntarypoticy
should nanage.donestic demandstrictty
and;shoutdr
.,be geared tona.rds
a
substantial.reduction
in
the net borro*ing
requirenentpf.
;central'governfient as ,a percent€ge
of
GNP,in
keepinguith
the
ain,
set"in
1'978,,,.of,.bringi1e
this
to
8 per
cent'in 1980. In
addition,
'increases tn.,'i6gtmet'shoutd'
not
aimto
coftpensat€for
the deterioration
in.the
terns
of trade;
In
this rer
i.
pectr-it
uoutd bedesirabte
for
the ssciat
partners
to
considera
changein
fhet,
'r,,indexat"ion
ctause.
If this
change,is
not
made,the
,Leve.[of
setttement.sfottouing
the
terrninationof
the
current provisions
shoutd be inftuencedby
the
fqct
that
aninappropriate compensation
for
the
deterioration
in
the
termsof
trade
uiLt
haveatreqdf
been nade. ,'-In order.to.fietp the
balanceof
payment.s and. support rese,rves,:$oo€tary"poti.cy
witt
have to, remai'n.tight
based'in.particutar
on the',mainte.nance.of
a
strict
ceiLing
on domesticcredit.
I
:'
:t
16.-,
In ItaLy, in
spite
of
the
continued growtho{
the
economyin
1979, thecurrent
account recorded another substantiaL surpLus. However,there
has beena
d'isturb'ingacceIeration
in
the
rate.of
lntl-ation
wh'ichis in
danger of, receivin,,. an additionaLboost
fromthe interaction
of
the
rise in
oiL prices
andthe
wage-indexat'ion system. Sti
Lt
greater
efforts
wouLdtherefore
sec,rn 1r
be necessary tocombat
infLation
wh'iLstat
the
sametime
achievingthe
tran.fe rf
rcsources necessaryto
support econom'ic growth..In
the
pubLic finan:e
'7,
the
gu'ide-tines
of
the
economic pLanfor
the
three-year period
1979-1
'., 'trich
waspre-sented Last January and wh'ich has
not
yet
been transLatedi- ,
,,€tcticaL
measures,sti
LL appearto
beappropriate
for
attaining
theseobject'iv',s. In
this
connect'ion,steps shouLd be taken
to
ensurethat
the
deficit of
the
enL-,r l
pubLicsector
('ll,
expressed asa
percentageof
gross domestic
product,
does fl(,1 r <r-ped 14 '/. in1980, which impLies
a
slight
reduction as
comparedwith
197e(4,6
%>.within
this
broad framework,the
shareof
current
experiditureshou
I fe
cut
back, whiLstthe
impLementationof
government investmentprojects
shouLd be acceLerated asfan
as possibLe. To meetboth
these requirements,it
wouLd'eeiTr necessary tocompiete
tire
reformof
the
pensions system,to
curbthe
growthof
spending onheaLth care and
to
speed upthe administrative
procedures oi-i whichthe
impLe-mentation
of
increased investment LargeLy depends.In
the
monetaryfie[d,
the abundantLiquidity
which has formedin
the
economy must be graduaL[y reabsorbed"To achieve
this
aim,
the
growthin
total"
Lending should be moderated and thepoLicy
of
consoLidatingthe
nationaLdebt
shouLd becontinued.
In
viewof
the sharprise in
prices
andr.to
a: Lesserextent, the
faLL 'in
the
surpLus on currentaccount,
interest
rates
shouLd bekept
at
a sufficientLy high
Leve[.
These poLicy guideLines incLudecertain
eLementsLike[y
to
sLow downthe rate
of
economicgrowth.
It
wouLdtherefore
seemto
be necessary,in
Linewith
th.e three-year pLan,to
encouragethe
propensity
to
invest
uhi[.st Limiting the
growth of hourLy wage-ratesto that
neededto
coverthe
simuLtaneous increasein
prires.
With
this
aimin
mindit
would be usefuLto
slow downthe rate
at
b,hicht*e
sLidingsca Le ad j ust-s wages and sa Lari es
to
prices,
and i nstead-
in
order
to
ensui'ethat
the
purchasing powerof
wage and saLary earnersis
maintained- to
grantreductions
in
taxation.
f t \
"'According
to
the
communitydefinition, this deficit
covers,
in
adOition tothe
borrowing requirementof
generat government, aLsothat
of
ENEL(electricity
suppty rnonopoLy) and those
of'the
independent pubLictrad'ing
bodies anci a[soLocaL
authority enterprises.
Howeverit
exctudes transfer"sto
speciaI credit
institutions,
repaymentof
commerciaI debtsincurred
in
the
past
and changesin
bank-deposits.I
I
Ir
the
l$ether.Lands" €cGf,remicactivit,yr
has beenfair[y
buo'fantin
tg?ft.sir,!6.e mid-1'978 unemp[oyaent has Levet[ed
off
'at
around4'Ite \
,!'
of
tbe ciui[i;an
La,bourforce
and con,suner pric.a..irtflation
has remainedretativeLy Lor.
ilith
export
gronth expectedto
stacken.the
expansion
:
iin Dntch economic
activity is
LikeLyto
sto.n doun sLightLyin
1980.Givsr,.^
the
rapid,inereasein
the
volumeof
e*ports
in
1979 andthe
n foreseeabterise
in
the
export
price
of
natural
gas,
the
trend
of
thebaLanee
of
paynents oncurrent
account [ooks more favourab[e and therecove,ry
is
probab[yset to'continue.
ConsequentLy, economic poLicyrna.kers'room
for
nanoeuvrein
the
short-term
is
stightty
greater
thanforecast.
In
the
frameworkof
the
centraL governmentdraft
budgetfor
1980
the authorities
havetherefore
takena series
of
net.t measures(strengthening
of
empIoyment, energysaving,
stimuLationof
innovation andstruetural
change) which-
taking
accountof
a certain
nurnber offiscat
neas.ures-
niLL
increasethe
budgetdeficit
by
some 1135nio.
guiLders
(0r3
N'of
GOP).It is
neverthelessstitL
necessaryto
press ahead,bri'th
effort to
restrain
t.he rnedium-term growthof
pub[ic
expenditure'-
the
only
,Fqq
way
to
Limit the
increasein
the
tax.burden onthe
economicalLy activesection
of
the
poputation andto
securea
[asting
improvementin
the
out-Lookfor
empLoyment.tlith
respectto
centraI
governmentborrouing
require-ment
in
1980the target
should benot
to
exeed3.7
i1of
GDP$.1 /
af
nationaI
income;this
shou[d makeit
possib[e
to
keepthe
borrowing-
reqr,rirement ona
cashbasis
for
general government unchangedat
4.7
frof
CDP
(5.2
I
of
hationat
income). The mainrisk is
anacce[eration
ofinfLation
which couLd endangerthe
achievements reaLisedrecent[y
in
thefieLd
of
compet'itiveness.It is in this
context'important
to
avoidthat
the
iDereasein
energyprices
provoke anadditionaL
increasein
nominatF,i '
il
"f:'i.
y,,,
t
s.".
rl
t
18.-In
BeLgium.,the
recoveryof
economicactivity
which beganin
1978 acceLeratednotably
in
1979. Despitethe
effect of
the
measuresto
assist
enrpLoyment(training'
coursesfor
young people; earLyretjre-ment,
etc.)
unemployment went onrisi'ng,
but only
for
womenThe increase
in
consumerprices
has gathered momentum. Thecurrent
accountdeficit
seemed againto
be
wideningdespite
reLativeIy
buoyant exportperformance. Growth wiLL probabLy 5[acken
to
someextent
in
1980,primariIy
as
a
resuLtof
the
sLowdownin
the
expansionof
export
markets.This
meansthat
the,employment-situationmight-well
remaiR precarious_. Furthermore,some acceLeration
in
consumerprices
seemsLikely.
The most worryingprobLem
for
economicpoLicy'is
stiLI
the
pubLicfinance
situation. In
theshort
term,
the
burdenof
ddjustment has been borne by monetarypolicy,
buta
reduct{onin
the
budgetdeficit is.the
onLy wayto
bring
abouta
Lastingreduction
of
the strains
onthe
financiaL
market whiLe stemm'ing the-tide
of infLation. In
order
to
avoid an appreciabLe increasein
the
pressureoJ
taxation
andpara-fiscaL
charges,a
stepp'ing upof
the
efforts
made inrecent years
to
reducethe
growthof
centraL government expenditureis
a
priority
task
and should be extendedto
cover aLsoother
publicadministrations,
notabLy soc'iaLsecurity.
Without such an exte.nsion ofausterity
measuresa
further rise in
the
borrowing requ'irementof
generaLgovernment wiLL be unavoidabLe, whereas
a
reductionof
the
boirowing requirementof
centraL governmentto
7.1
%of
GDPat
most should beaimed
at for
1980. With respectto
incomesit
is'important
to
aLLowfor
the
fact that
the
termsof
trade deterioration
Linits
severeLythe
scopefor
granting. reaL in,creaseS(apart'from
indexation).:
In
Luxemqgug,the
economy has beenfair!y
buoyant and unempLoymenthas shown some tendency
to fa[[.
Thetevet
of tax
revenue has turned outto
bedistinct[y
higher
than expecteda
year ago mainty ouingto
thepersistent
buoyancyof
the tert'iar:y sector.
In
1979,the
general governmentaccount r.riLL
therefore
ctoseuith
net
Lendingof
the-o.rderof
1.7
% of GDP and shouLd remainin
surpLusin
1980. Even atLouingfor
some sLow- ,.
.down
in
the
growthof
economicactivity, it
shouldnot
decline
betow1
% of6DP. To .this,
end,
the
Lendingof
centrat
government shoutdnot
be reducedby more than
0.5
7
ot
GDPfrom
1979to
1980.?
i.
tl &t
ll ;
t.
lr,J
4.
!c
i:*
I
?0.-rn
the
uirited
Kingdom economicactivity
has been somewhatunbaLanc"i
in
1grg.
Thestrong
gron,thof
domesti-c demandwas LargeLy
-met
from imports so
that
the current
accountof
the
batanceof
paymentsmoved
into
substantial
deficit, in
spite
of
uor,h
Sea
oiI
production approaching seLf-sufficiency
LeveIs.Stert'ing
rema.inedstrong
however,-as
"
resutt
of
the internationaI
energysituati:on
coup[ed wianrrnn,
monetary
poLicies
in
the u-K..
This
he[pedto
dampenprice infLation
but caused
a
further
deterioration
in
the
UK's competitiveposition.
The netlGovernment
identified
the
main weaknessesof
the
British
economy as being
. suppty-reLated and
is
attacking
thesestructuraL
pro.btemsby
reducingpubLic
sector intervention,
by
imlroving
incentives
to
the
private
sector
inparticu[ar
bya
sharp change'fromdirect to indirect
taxation,
whiLe
main-tainins
f irm monet-arv poLicies.
Exchanse conlroLs have"i."
;""; ,;;r;;;.iaI
LyreIaxed'
Takinginto
account "theshort-tbrm
deftationary effects
of-the
net.l monetary and budgetary
poIiciesr.domestic
derlandis
expectedto
weakenin
1980 andthe
deficit
onthe current
accountof
the
balanceof
paymentsshout'd be much reduced- 0n present
poticies,
the pubIic
sector
borrowingrequirement, as
a
percentageof
GDP shouLd"not
exceedin
19g0-E1the figure
of4
112 %,as
is
now foreseenfor
1g7g/gl.
Should earningsrise
excessiveLy,taking
into
account moreoverthe
Likety
fatL in
o,,tput
andproductivity
in
1980,the
consequences cou[d bevery serious
for
internationaL
compet.i-tiveness
andpdrticul"arly,
for
employmentprospects.
The Government shoutd,however,
not
accommodate suc,h deveLopments byadjusting
the target
ratefor
the
growthof
moneysupp[y.
Establishmentof
a stable
towrate
of
price-infiation
and improvedconditions
of
resourceaItocation
haveto
beoul.--riding
objectives.
.l