Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
2006
Repetition/Series
Anthony Trinchera
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please [email protected].
Recommended Citation
ROCHESTERINSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
A Thesis Submittedto the
Faculty
ofThe College of
Imaging
Arts and SciencesIn
Candidacy
forthe DegreeofMASTER OF FINE ARTS
Repetition/Series
By
Anthony
TrincheraApprovals
Chief Advisor _ ... Do<..!r ... TJ..!hw.:o~m~a=-s .!...!Rc!... L!=..!i.:;;lg.!...!h~tf~o~o~t _ _ _ (please type)
Thomas R. Lightfoot (Signature)
Date:
Associate Advisor _-=E::..:.i,:.::1 e:...;:e:..:..n:....F:....;e=..;e::..:n...:..;e::"'Y<-=.B..:::u.::.s:...:.h:...:.n.::.e"",-Ii _ _ (please type)
(Signature)
Date:
Associate Advisor Luvon Sheppard (please type)
(Signature)
Date:
Dep~nt~ernon_~D~o~n~a~l~d~A~r~d~a~y _ _ _ _ (please type)
(Signature)
Date:
Thesis Reproduction Permission Statement:
A signed and dated ''Thesis Reproduction Permission" statement must be included on or after the title page and signature approval page.
I understand that I must submit a print copy of my thesis or dissertation to the R1T Archives, per current RIT guidelines for the completion of my degree. I hereby grant to the Rochester Institute of Technology and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in all forms of media in perpetuity. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis or dissertation. I also retain the rightto use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation.
Print Reproduction Permission Granted:
I, Anthony Trinchera , hereby grant permission to the Rochester Institute of Technology to reproduce my print thesis or dissettation in whole or in part. Any reproduction will not be for commercial use or profit.
Introduction
Thebasis formythesisisa minimalistapproachtomakingartthrough the
exploration ofprocess, series and repetition. Thematically,thecore oftheartworkthatI
produce revolves around a simplificationoftheformsanddesignsthatI chooseto
portray. Artistically,I aminterested invarious qualitiesincludingline,flatnessofshapes
and simplified color range astheyare appliedto thetwo-dimensional. Thismannerof
working stems fromadesireIhavetoforgorealisticdepictionofmy subjectsinfavorof
a more abstracted approach.
Workingwithin aneducationalframework, Ipreferredtorelyonmy intuitive
abilities and utilize repetitivetechnique fortheproduction of artwork. Havingabandoned
anypreset notions ofimageandform,I soughttofocusontheoutgrowthofideasthat
sprung fromapurelyformaland mediadrivenmethodology. Itwasmyintentionto use
repetitious methods ofworking inordertoexploredeepersubconsciousissueswithin
myself andinvestigatetherolethatprocess plays inaccessingpersonal content.
Fourprojectsbest illustrate mythesisgoals. Sinceprocessisaprimaryelement
involvedinmythesis, Iwilldescribethesevariousprojectsin detailandtalkaboutthe
many issuesthataroseduringtheevolution ofthese series. Ishall also discussmy
inspirationsforwork,cite arthistoricalreferencesand analyzemythesis exhibition. I
willformacritical evaluationofthe work,discussingtherelative successes andfailures
Four Series
1. Handprints
BBffBf" $gg
ISftMFSBBi*! 47STiV5S|i i
X ' -tfiS
1* ! ItllBM'tg
li^JoSIKB
&ff-3SH*!B3B
3g&-"4S8M!!
*-.*a-a ua
a2*s*H max
w^ea^s was
i&K* B-!IMB!*iaSf
Fig. 1. Mearfloofa,2003. Fig. 2. Mea< HooAs (detail).
The basis for mythesisworkbegan roughly midwaythroughmy firstquarterat
RIT. Iwasdealingwithalotoffrustration because I hadn'tcreated artonaregularbasis
foraboutthreeyears andfound it very difficulttoplunge back intoalifethatwouldsee
artas adailyoccurrence. IcametoRITthinkingthatI could gobackto thekindof
art-making I'ddoneseveral yearsbefore, namelylargenon-representational oil paintings. I
hadtried thisapproachtomakingartinthebeginningofmyfirstquarter atRIT,but
attemptingtobeginagainfromwhereI'dleftoff several years beforeproved
unsuccessful. Toomuchtimehadpassedformetostill retaininterest inmyprevious
mannerofworking,andIfeltasthoughI hadtosomehow regainmyenthusiasmforart
ingeneral. AtthetimeIthoughttryingsomethingnew andcompletelydifferentwould
helptoinspiremecreatively andrecapturemypassionformakingart.
I madearather spontaneousdecisiontouse4"x
6"
index cards asmy working
surface. I'dusedthecardsforan earlier classassignment and realizedthatI enjoyed
themas aworkingsurfacebecauseoftheirsmallformatand sense ofimmediacy. This
[image:5.547.269.481.109.270.2]formatwas somethingthatIwas not usedtoandit forcedmetoadjustmymanner of
workingto suitthe sizelimitation. Sincethearea ofthecard surface wassominiscule,I
hadtodecide howtoutilizethespacethrough technique. I couldnot executeintricate,
detailed drawingsor paintings oncards,butatthesametime,I wantedtotrysomething
atypicalofwhatI wouldnormally havedone.
Actingonimpulse,Iplaced some cards onthefloorofmy studio and crushedbits
of a charcoal stickintothemwithmyfoot. Iexploredvarious patternsanddesigns on
several cards andthengathered some oftheblack dust fromthecrushed charcoal sticks.
Thisdustwas combined with water and smeared ontothecardsusing my hands. Itried
manydifferentwaysofapplyingthewet mediato thesurface ofthecards andeventually
settledoncreatingindividualprints ofmyhands,palmsidedown. Ienjoyedthe
immediacyand ease ofthe process,whichallowed metoworkrapidly makingoneprint
after another. I foundtheimage createdbymy handtobeaninterestingabstraction
representationthatretainedfigurativecharacteristics. Aesthetically,each print was aflat
formwithvirtuallynodetail,butremainedeasilyrecognizable as ahand. Mostofthe
printswerecomposedof six elements: mypalmandthefiveseparatefingers. Yet I did
varytheimagestoa certain extentbyprintingsinglefingersandnopalm or vice versa.
SometimesI wouldsimplyprintonefingerbyitselfortrydifferentcombinations.
Throughthisprocess, IbelievethatIwasworkingthroughadesiretoportrayafigurative
element withinmyworkusingmyselfastheimpetus.
Astheprojectprogressed,manychanges occurred with regardtoimagery and
materials. Throughrepetition,I was abletopushtheinherentpotential ofthecardformat
processtogrow andtransform,and assuch,I initiatedvarious changesincludingthe
employment ofblackacrylic paint and collage. Usingthisnew mediahadadirecteffect
ontheimagery beingproduced andfostered changesto theprintedimagesthemselves. I
foundthatmakinga print with acrylic paint asopposedto usingwet, groundcharcoal
yieldeddifferentresultsbecausethereaction ofeach, when coupled withtheindexcards,
was notthesame. The resultingformstookondifferentcharacteristicsdictatedbythe
media. Forexample, a print madewithcharcoalwould produceasomewhatlighterand
blurrierimagethanone madewithacrylic paint.
Whentheprojectwasfinished, I'dcreatedabout300+handprints [Fig. 1]thatI
affixedtomy studiowallduringthecourseoftheseries. Theprintsdisplayedmultiple
variationsonform,techniqueand contentall basedaroundthelikenessofmyhand [Fig.
2]. Since I'dworkedonthemajorityoftheprintsina rapidmanner,Iwas notalways
aware ofwhat wasoccurringwithintheprintsthemselves. Generally,Iwould make a
print, setitaside,andthenimmediatelymovetoonto thenextone. However,takingthe
timetoobservethefinishedseries allowed metorecognizethatI wasdealingwith
imagerybasedonfigurativeand spur-of-the-momentactions. The printsthemselveshad
avery"quick"lookaboutthem,meaning itwasvisuallyevidentthatI'dcreatedthemat a
briskpace. This
"fast"
lookwasrecognizablethroughsplattersofpaint or wetcharcoal,
andmovements ofmy handonthepapersurface,which created"smeared"or
"wiped-across"
qualities.
Throughplacementonthe wall,I could see series within seriesoccurringand
groupingsthatwere createdmerelybychance and random positioning. Intermsof
particulargroupand represented a specific portionoftime thatI'dspentonthem. I did
not set outtocreate self-portraiture per se or depictthehuman formrealistically,but my
ownindividualrepresentationhad beenmade soclearlythatIcannotdenythepersonal
accountbeingportrayed. Ultimately Iwascreatingavery personal statementusing
repetitiontoshow eachindividualmarkI'dmade. Ithinktheentireseriesfunctionsasan
account of a period withinmylifethatsawmyenthusiasmforartretvirning. Inaway,it
serves as anin-depth document fromwhichI couldtraceapassageoftimebythemarks
myhand hadmade. Bylookingatcertain groups ofcards,I could recounttheamount of
time spentduringa particular session oridentifywhena change ortransformationto the
processhadoccurred.
Theentire experiencehad been veryliberatingformebecause Inolonger felt
heldbackbyanypersonal artistic constraintsor expectations. Itwasveryfreeingtocast
aside certainpreviouslyheldnotionsIhadaboutmakingart such ascreatingrealistic or
visuallycorrectrepresentationsof subjectmatter,i.e., figures, objects. Inaddition,I
wasn'tconcerned withtraditional aspects relatedtoart such ashigh-gradematerials and
the "proper"usage and application of media InthebeginningI didn'tcare or even give
muchthought to themannerinwhichthefinishedprintslooked. Inthat respect, Iwas
moreinterested in repeating certainprocess-driven steps. Iwasworking spontaneously
and atsucharapid pacethatifa printdidn'tlook particularlyappealing, Iwouldsimply
setitaside and move ontothenextone. Atthesametime,throughexploration and
experimentation,I became invested inthismethod ofproducing inmultiples.
Oneofmyother previousnotionsformakingart wasthe traditionalmanner of
creatingsingle, individualpaintings,drawings,prints,orsculpturesthatcouldbe
regarded asindependentefforts. Withrepetition, I feltthateachindividualprint
functionedas a part of agroupaesthetic. Inotherwords,I didn'tregardtheprints as
separatefinishedpiecesthatcould standontheirownasindividualworksofart. The
power ofthe series camefromthe sheerquantityofprints,which worktogethertoforma
largerwhole.
ItwasduringthesesessionsthatI firstexperienced atruefeeling of rhythm
throughrepetition. By"rhythm"I meanthatI'dachieveda senseof comfort withmy
work process andaphysical connectionto theactofcreatingart. Havingcome froman
Abstract Expressionistbackgroundand assomeone whoenjoysphysicalactivity,being
"in-the-moment"
and"one"withtheartworkisa sensationthatI veryoften strivefor.
Frequently,theprocess ofcreatingartis formebothphysical as well as psychological.
FortheHandprintProject,I wasusing myphysical self as atoolforcreatingthe work,
withmy handfunctioningasthedirectmeansfortheapplication ofmediato thesurface.
Mydecisiontoworkinthismannerstemmedfromafeelingof physicalcomfortin
placingwetcharcoalorpaint ontomy handsandformingtheimages directly. My
interest inthismethod wasestablishedverysoon afterthefirst fewprintsbecausethe
visual qualityofthehandprints combined withthecorporeal component neededto
producetheimageswasveryappealingtome. Ienjoyedthecreation oftheprints
physically because Iwasabletomove about as opposedtositting inone place and
working. Thisfeelingof movementcontributedto theexecution oftheprintsinmany
ways. Forexample,Imade someprintsthatcouldonlyhave beenexecutedbystanding
hardonto a card. Alloftheseactions were anefforttoachieve certain visualeffects, but
atthesametime,IcouldtellbythemovementsIwasmakingifa print wouldbe
successful or not. In away, itwasverycomparabletoexerciseandthefeelingof
satisfaction one can experience whenthebodyandmind arein fixedunison.
The Handprintseries ended whenIbecamenolonger interested in thestyle ofthe
imagery andtheprocess neededtoproducethework. I feltasthoughnothingmorecould
be donewiththeseries andthat thelimitsofthetechniquehad beenpushedasfarasI
couldtake them. After producing somanyprints, theexcitementI'dexperiencedatthe
beginninghadwornoff andIfeltitwastime tostartsomething different. Iwasstillvery
interestedin exploringrepetition, but Iwantedtochannelmyenthusiasm andenergy for
thismethodina newdirection.
Eachnewseries ofartworkthatIcreatedyieldeda personalchallenge,namely
findingatechniquethatwouldfitinwiththerepetitivemannerthatIwishedtocontinue.
Toworkrepetitivelymeanshavingthepatiencetodothesamethingover and over again.
Thiscanbecome verymonotonous, eventedious, soitwasimportant formetofind
techniques thatwouldbeinterestingenoughtoworkwith. Oneoftheproblems Ifaced
whenworkinginmultipleswasthat the techniqueinvolved hadtolend itselfto the
repetition. Thisexplorationledtomuch experimentation withmyartist materialsinorder
2. Drip-Paintings
Fig. 3. Untitled(DripPaintings),2004.
AftertheHandprintproject, I continuedtoworkrepetitivelyontheindexcards,
usingacrylic paintwith variousbrushes. Aftermuchexperimentation,I abandonedthe
practiceofapplyingpaintdirectlyto thecardswith abrushand settled on atechniqueof
bendingthecardslengthwiseinahalf-moonstyle anddippingtheminto a separate
containers of watertintedwithred,blueorpurple paint. AswiththeHandprints,I
wantedtokeepthecolor rangetoa minimum andtheforms simplistic sothatIcould
replicatetheprocess withease. When Ipulleda cardoutofthecontainer, Icould retain a
smallamountof water ontheshortend andtipit insuch awayastohavetheexcess
waterrundownthecenterlengthwise. Theresult was ahalf-moonstain ofdilutedacrylic
paintwithalineordripcomingoutofthecenter.
After Imade severaldozenofthesesmallindexcarddrip-paintingsinrapid
succession, Inoticedthat theseries waslackinga certain visual component. Ifoundthe
shapeI'dcreatedtobeaesthetically pleasing,buttheimageitselfwastooemptyand
simplistic,asif itwerejustaworkingexercise rather than afinishedpiece or partofa
series.
ThesolutionIcameupwith wastoadd a"highlight"toeachdampenedcard.
Thisconsisted of asmall, semi-circularblobofconcentrated, orstraight,paint appliedto
theintersectionofthehalf-moonstain andthedrip[Fig. 3]. Executed inthis manner, the
blobofpaintblendedinwiththe surroundingforms. Inoticedthatwith each changeI
made,myprocessbecamemorecomplexandinvolvedmore steps. Consequently,I
neededtoadjustmytechnique to suit eachnewmodification. IrealizedthatI neededto
work muchfaster because Ihadtoaddthepainthighlightwhilethesurface ofthecard
was stilldamp. TimingwaseverythingwiththisprojectandIpracticedthetechnique
repeatedly inordertoachieve thesense of rhythmthatI desired.
Withthisprojectinparticular, therewasakindof push-pullIwasexperiencing
with regardto theamount ofcontrolI actuallymaintained over what washappening. On
theonehand,Idevelopedthis techniquethroughtrial and errorandfeltcomfortable
overallwithit. However,Ineverfelt incomplete controlbecause Iwasworkingwiththe
effectthatgravitywashavingonthewater and paper. Thislackof control was exciting
tomebecause Iwasneveronehundredpercentsureof what wouldhappenwhenI tilted
thecards. Sometimes Imisjudgedandthewater woulddripinadirectionIhadn't
intendedresulting inaruinedcard. Therewas an elementof chanceinvolved, anditwas
almost asifIwerebettingonwhetherornotI couldbe successfulatthis technique. If I
with and could addto theseries. IfI wereincorrect, Iwouldhavetodealwiththe
frustrationofwastedtimeandeffort,somethingthatcouldbreak mysenseofrhythm.
This lackof control wasreinforced whenIenlargedthescaleof thepaintings. I
feltthatI'dpushedthepotentialoftheindexcardsfarenough and nolongerexperienced
the same sense of challengefromthe smallformat. By increasingthe scale, thedifficulty
inmakingthepaintings wouldintensifyandI would againbetestedinmyabilityproduce
thepaintingstomysatisfaction. Iwas also curiousto seetheresultsfrom using larger
quantities of paint andwater onbiggersheets of paper.
Iincreasedthe scalegradually,going from thesmall indexcards and somewhat
largerpiecesof papertobigger22"
x30"sheets. Iwantedtocontinue withthesame
basicshape,buttheincreasein scale required adifferentmanner ofcreatingtheprincipal
forms. Iwas unabletodipthe piecesof paperintothewaterbecause theyweretoobigto
fit intoa container. Asasolution,I decidedtoapplythedilutedpaintto thesurfacewith
alarge brush. The half-moonshape waseasyto recreate,butthechallenge was inthe
actualtiltingoftheselargersheets ofpaperand theapplicationofthehighlight. The
largesheets wereheavierandrequiredbothofmy handstosteadythepaper whileI
manipulatedthe dripdownthecenter. Itwasvery clumsy inthebeginningandIhadto
practicethisquite abitbefore Icould makeall ofthestepsworkinunison.
Acuriousvisualelementbecameapparentearlyonintheseries whenI was still
usingindexcards andexperimentingwiththehighlightarea. Icreatedthis shapepurely
outof experimentation ofmaterialsanddidnotintendforittoberepresentative ofany
particularsubject. However,InoticedthatwhenItook thefinishedpaintingswiththe
highlightadded andturned themhorizontally,theyappearedtohaveafigure-like quality.
Theshape oftheimagecombined withtheflesh-likecolors Iwasusingmadethe
half-moonform look likean abstractversionof awoman'sbreast inprofile. Thedrip
resembled averyelongatednipple, which appearedasthoughitwerebeingpulled right
offtheedge ofthepaper.
I believethatthis series, alongwiththeHandprintProject,representsapersonal,
albeitsubconscious, returnto thefigureas asource ofsubjectmatter. Ihadnotdoneany
in-depthstudiesofthehumanbodyforseveralyears, soIwasn'treadynordid I desireto
jumprightinand make paintingsbasedonproportionallycorrector realistic
representations. However,Iwas atthe timedoingsomefigurative drawingonalimited
basis,slowly working my way backtocomprehensive studies ofthehuman form. Ifelta
certain amountofcomfortin studyingasubjectI'dhadprevious experiencewithandI
believethisenjoymentinfluencedtheDripPaintings. The humanbodyhasalwaysbeen
a source offascination forme,butI'dnever explorediton as abstract alevelasIhad
withthisproject. I'vealwaysbeen drawntothefigurebecauseofmyinterestinphysical
activityandhowthehumanbodyfunctions,thatis,themechanics ofit.
Ithinkthatsubconsciously I desiredverymuchtoexplorethefigurein my
painting, but Iwantedtodo itrepetitivelyand createimagesthroughdistortionand
simplification ofform. Since I'dbeendrawingmyentire lifeandhad becomewell
versedinthisformoffigurative art,I believedI couldbranchout and make
representations inan unorthodoxmanner. As Ihadbefore,I didnot set concrete goalsfor
achieving these results, but insteadworkedthroughanintuitiveprocessbasedon
conceptsthatwerefamiliartome.
3.Fold-OverPaintings
Fig. 4. GorillaGods,2004. Fig. 5.Hand+Heads,2004.
For mynextproject,I againsought out anewtechnique touseforrepetition. As
withtheprevioustwo series, Iexperienced afeelingthatI'dtaken theprocess asfarasI
couldand nolonger desiredtowork withthesame method. Lookingback,Ican make
thevery clear observationthatmy desireandenthusiasmfor usingcertaintechniques
weresomewhatfleeting,lasting aslongasseveralmonths or as short as afewweeks.
Aftera certain amountoftimehadpassed, IwouldbegintofeelthatI'dexhausted allof
thepossibilitiesforaparticular repetitiveaction. Thesense ofmonotonyassociatedwith
repetitionandperformingthe same setof stepsrepeatedly wouldbegintowear onmeto
thepoint whereIcouldnolongercontinue. Eventually,myinterest forthese techniques
wouldrunitscourse. Iconsidermyuseofrepetitiontobea conceptbasedoncreating
artworkthroughmeansthatweretemporaryintheiremployment. Iwould work onthese
projectsat suchanintensepacethatmysessions seemedlikeshort,forcefulburstsof
[image:15.547.80.271.114.313.2]creativitythatwouldlastseveral weeksor months. Oncetheenergywas expendedthe
project was over. Iwas unabletocontinue same methodforvery longand neededto
effect a changeinthemannerthatI created art. This is howIwouldmovefromone
projectto thenext.
I wasprimarilyconcerned withcreatingpaintingsinwaysthatwere unfamiliarto
me. I'dexperienced enjoymentfromthefindingof newtechniquesand wishedto
continue on a paththatwould sustain a sense of wondermentthroughdiscovery. Attimes
I wouldfeellikeaninventorwhohasmade a significantbreakthroughand experiences a
rushof excitementfromhavingdevelopedsomethingnew.
I beganthenextbodyofworkbyplacingsomelatexpaintinto 16oz. plastic
containers anddribblingitalittle bitat atimeontothesurface of some sheets of colored
paper. Mydecisiontouselatexwasbasedon severalfactors. Itwasreadily available
(I'd already hadsomein my possession) and couldbeusedinlargequantitiesfor
minimal expense. Inaddition,Iwasinterested inthethickqualityofthepaint. The
thicknessofthepaintdidnot allowforexcessivespreading(somethingIdidnotdesire),
but itwas stillfluidenoughforme createdesignsthroughpouringanddribbling actions.
After I'ddribbledadesignonthe paper,Iwouldfoldonehalfofthesheet over
andthenpullthe twohalvesapartinaRorschachink blotteststyle. Myarrival atthis
method wastheresultofrandomexperimentationwithmaterials andtimespentdeciding
iftheprocess wasinterestingenoughtocontinue. IhadtoaskmyselfifIwouldfeel
comfortable enough withthisnewfoundtechniqueandiftheimagesproduced were
visually satisfying. Ibased mysatisfactionabouttheimageson whatIconsideredtobe
aestheticallyinteresting. Asanartist,Ihave certainstandardsthatareverypersonal with
regardtowhatI likeordislike. Specifically,Iwassearching fora methodof repetition
thatwould produceimageryemployingboldcolor,strongcontrast,andsimplificationof
form. Ibelievethiswas aneffortonmyparttoform imagesof a graphicnaturethat
wouldina sense catchtheviewer's eyethroughswirlingdesigns, symmetryand vivid
color. I wasseekingtoproduce workthatwasnot subtleandcouldalso draw itsvisual
powerfrommass numbers. Bycreatingvibrant, attention-grabbingpaintingsinlarge
quantities ratherthan small,Ibelievedtheimpactcouldbe strengthened visually.
Asthe series progressedI begantoformulateimagesthatwerefigure-like in
appearance, but stilllargelyabstracted. These individualforms,oneper sheetofpaper,
werebornout ofthe movementsI'dmade whileIwasdribblingthepaintfromthe
containers. I foundenjoymentin creating swirls andloopswiththe paint, andlikenedthe
movementstogestural sweepsthatone might executeduringmoretraditionaldrawing.
I'dagain returnedtothefigureasa source ofinspiration,butthistimeIwasmore aware
ofmy subject matter. Traditionalfiguredrawinghadatthis pointbecomearegular
occurrence forme andthisundoubtedly influencedthese fold-overpaintings. Thefirst
set ofimagestookon a gorilla-like appearance andIreferredto theseasthe"Gorilla
Gods"
[Fig. 4]. Thoughthesepaintingsdidnotlookfullyhumanand possessed qualities
of a somewhat
"animal"
nature,theycould stillbe clearlyreadasfigurativein
appearance.
The Gorilla Godpaintings werebasedon averysymmetrical method of creation.
The design foreachpaintingwasformedbyitsbeingreproduced almostidenticallyon
each side ofthe sheetthrough the foldingof onehalfontotheotherhalf. I'd become
attractedto symmetrybecause itwasineffect abyproduct oftheprocess. I was once
againdealingwiththeelement of chance andtheexcitement relatedtoafeelingofthe
unknown. Inorderforanimagetobecreated,Ihadtospeculate astohowthedribbled
paint would react onceitwasfolded fromoneside ofthepapertotheother. Thenature
ofthepaint(its verythick,fluidquality) wassuchthatthedribbled design Icreatedon
theonehalfwould change as aresultofpressure exertedfromthefoldingaction. This
time, thesignificantlackof control was an even stronger componentoftheprocessthan
myprevious series. Ifrequentlyexperiencedsurpriseand amazementattheresults ofthe
foldedsheetsofpaper. In manycases, thefinisheddesignwouldbecompletelydifferent
fromwhatI'dexpected andthissense of wondermentfueled myenthusiasmforthe
process.
FollowingtheGorilla Godpieces, whichconstitutedthe largestset offold-over
paintings, Icontinuedwiththefold-overtechnique,butmovedontoexplore new
imagery. I chosethis time todealwiththehumanbodymoredirectly bycreating six
fold-overpaintingsofhands ina straight-on view. Thehandsexhibitedan appearanceof
reachingupwardtowardafacethatI'dcollagedintotheopen spacebetweenthem [Fig.
5]. Thisbreak-up ofthespacesettheseHand+Headpaintings apartbecausethestrong
quality ofsymmetry, whichcharacterizedthe GorillaGods,was nowdiminishedbythe
introductionof aforeignelementintotheopenarea Theadditionoftheface-imagewas
aneffortonmyparttofill upa significantamount ofempty spaceinthepicture plane
andportraya more accuraterenderingofhumancharacteristics. Thesewere notfully
formedhumanfigures,butrather, componentsrelatedto thehumanbody
-namelythe
headwithfacialfeatures,andtwohands. Iwasattemptingtorepresentthehuman form
morerealistically,but Iwantedtoapproachthismannerofdepiction gradually because I
wasstillintheprocess ofreturningtofigurativerepresentation.
[image:19.547.145.409.146.365.2]4. Tony-Heads
Fig. 6.TonyHeads,2005.
The final seriesIfocusedonwasthe seriesthatrelied moreontraditionalartistic
methodsof creationthanany other. Drawingisanabilitythathasalways comenaturally
tomeandisanactivity inwhichI amconstantly involved. Itwasthrough theact of a
certainkind ofdrawing, namelystream-of-consciousnessdrawing,thatIhadproduced
theimageofthe facethatwaseventually collagedintotheHand+Headpaintings and
becamethefocus ofmylastseries. Thisgenericfacewas not newto me, butrather
somethingthatadornedmynotebooks,padsofpaper, folders, etc.,foryears. I'dcreated
thiscartoon-like image spontaneouslythroughsketchingaswaytodealwith
uninteresting, monotonousor protracted momentsin mylife. Ilookthis typeof
sketchingas acopingmechanismthatiscalmingtome. I supposethedrawn head itself
cameaboutbecauseofmylifelonginterest inthedepictionofthehuman figure.
When I startedtousetheface in myartwork, I changeditslightly so asto
resemblemyownhead. Atfirst,trueself-portraiture was notmyaimbecause Iwas
seekingtoavoid moretraditionalapproachesto thecreationofart. Yet,withmy firsttwo
seriesI wasdelvingbackintomyinterest inthehuman figurethroughabstraction. Inthe
third series, I'dmade a consciousdecisionto showfurther identifiable humanattributes
inmypaintings. I believethischoice carried overintoadeliberateobjectivetoportray
an even more recognizable representation ofthehuman form. Forme,nothingwasmore
recognizablethanmyownhead. Ialsowantedtouse asubjectthatwasfamiliartome so
that Icould moreeasilyreplicateit fora series.
Thefacewas averysimpledesign,justadrawingusually doneon whichever
piece of paperwasreadilyavailabletome. Ienjoyedthesimplicityoftheformand
noticedthatIcouldreproduceitwith ease. SinceitwassomethingthatIwasfamiliar
with, IdidnothavetospendalotoftimepracticingthewayinwhichIwantedtheimage
tolook. Thechallenge wasinincreasingthe scale, whichis somethingthatIdecidedto
do earlyonbecauseupto that point, theface had been justatinysketch. Sincethe sketch
wassomethingthatI'dreplicated countlesstimeson a minisculelevel (Iwouldusually
do manyofthemat atime),myinterest inthesmallnessofit hadceased. Myintentwas
tomaketheface a more prominent andvisibleimage.
Startingout,I used alargehouse-paintingbrushwithblack, andoccasionally,
dark blueacrylicpainton sheets of paperthatwere22"x30". As I'ddonein thepast, I
experimentedwithmymaterialsuntilI becamesettledinto a seriesofactionsforthe
productionof eachindividual image. IncreasingthescalemeantthatIwouldhaveto
producetheheadina mannerverydifferentfrom thediminutive facesIwas usedto
making. Now,Iwasspendingmoretimeproducingtheindividual featuresand as a
result, theface hadbecomemuchmore complex. Theprocesstoproducejustonehead
wasfarmoreinvolvingatthisscaleIneededtoemploy a seriesofbrushstrokesthat
would work withrepetition.
After spendingsometimeandlettingtheseries develop, I decidedto take the
projectinadifferent directionbymakingsome simple offsetmonoprintsfromthewet
acrylic pieces [Fig. 6]. Makingprints seemedlikealogicalstepto takebecausewiththis
approach,Icould replicatetheheadalmostimmediately. Once I'dpressed ablanksheet
of paper ontothewetacrylic drawing,Iwouldhave aninstantaneouscopyoftheoriginal.
Afterdoingjustafewofthese monoprints,Inoticedthattheypossessedcertain
visual qualities separatefromtheoriginaldrawings. Therewastheclearindicationofthe
brushstrokesevidentintheprints and a particular roughness offormthatwas causedby
the contactbetweenthetwosheetsofpaper. Additionally,theoriginaldrawings
themselveshad beenalteredslightlyfromthepressingofthepaper. Asa resultofthis
contact, thelineswereflattenedmakingthemfatterandthicker. Since myownheadwas
thecatalystforthis seriesofpaintings, theirforms,despitebeingabstractedand
simplified,retainedforthemostpart,mytrueanatomical proportions. Withthe
monoprintingprocess,myfaceandhead had become distortedto thepointofbeing
almostunrecognizable. Theheadwas muchheavierandbulkier. Itwas asifanewhead
wasformedwithonlyafewofmyfeatures remaining. Seeingmyownheadalteredin
thatmannerwassomething I'dnotexpected,andas aresultitwas abitstartling.
After producingafairamountofdrawingsandmonoprints,Iincreasedthescale
ofthese"Tony-Heads"inanefforttofurtherchallenge myself andbreakawayfromthe
monotonyoftheprocess. Iacquiredsomephoto-backdroppaperwhichcameinvery
largerolls,roughly9'
x40', andcutitdowninto fourseparate rolls eachmeasuringabout
53"
x 16'. Aftertackingtherollstoawall, Iproceededtouseblack latexpaint withlarge
house paintingbrushestodraw large headsone after anotherasquicklyasI could. I
foundthat thebest waytoexecutethisrepetitive action wastostart atthetopofthehead
andworkmy waydown, filling inthefeaturesofthefaceas Iwent along. Thismethod
ofdrawingwasquitecontraryto the techniquesI'dtraditionallyused. Indrawing,I'd
become accustomedtofirstrenderingtheoverall shape ofthesubject andthenfilling in
thedetailsafterward. Butthesefundamental elements ofdrawingwereirrelevanttothis
particular processbecause Iwas notseekingtomake an accuraterenderingofmy face.
TheTony-Headsacted asakindoficonorsymbolfromwhichIwas derivingacertain
utilitarian use
-namelyasourceforrepetitious action. Insteadof eachheadfunctioning
as a conventional self-portrait withfinelydetailedfacial attributes,Iwasusingtheimage
as akindofmass producedcharacterthatwasextremely graphicinnature:aflattened,
simplifiedform,which seemedtofloatonthewhitesurface ofthepaper.
However,making my head intoa symbol oriconwasawayformetoplace
myselfdirectlyintothework and adda personalcomponenttoit. Atfirst,Ideniedthe
factthatthesereallywere self-portraits. NomatterhowmuchI attemptedtolookatthese
paintings as separatefrommyself-icons or symbolswithout personal
meaningor
attachment
-there wastheundeniablefactthattheylooked verymuchlikeme. Ithink
therewasstill anelement oftheimpersonal increatingsomanyofthem,theideathat
individualidentitycanbelost amongmassnumbers, but portrayingmyselfinthismanner
could not stiflethefact thatthesewerevery largerepresentations ofmyownphysical
form,no matterhowabstractI'dmadethem.
I believethatwiththisparticularseries,Ifeltthestrongestconnectionboth
physicallyandpsychologically to theactual process. Thiswasdueto thefactthatIwas
usingtechniqueswithwhichIwas experienced. Consequently, I didn'tneedtogo
through theprogressionoffamiliarizingmyself withmybrushesand paintor spendtime
learninghowthematerials wouldbehave. Thepreviousthreeserieshadrelied on
techniques thatwere unfamiliartome andwerenot"standard"methodsforcreating art.
Theywere alsobasedon more complicatedprocedures,which required moreattention
and practiceforexecution. Therefore,Ineededtospendtime learninghowtheprocesses
wouldoperate andtakemore careinimplementingsaidtechniques.
Influences. Inspirations and Comparisons
When Ibegantheworkthatwouldconstitutemythesis,Idrew inspirationfroma
number ofinfluences,whichacted aspre-existingconstantsthatI was always
subconsciouslyawareof.
TheinfluenceofAsianart was a point of referencethatI couldclearly looktoor
atleast beconscious of as aninspiration forcertain projects. My interestin Asianartand
philosophy goesbacka number of years andduringthis timeI'vecometoidentifymore
stronglywithEasternmethodsofdepictionthanWestern. Myowneducationissteeped
inaWesternperspectivetorenderrealisticallywhendepictingasubject,be ita
landscape,figure,object, etc. Fromanearlyage,Iwas adept atthis method, especially
whenitcametodrawing. However,as I studiedAsianart andbecameaware ofthe
philosophybehindit,Irealizedthatrealistic representationdoesnothavetobethemain
objective of art. Accordingly,Ibecamemoreinterestedinsimplification offormand
flatnessofcolor astheyare appliedtopaintinganddrawing.
I wasparticularlyattractedto traditionalChinesewatercolorpaintingandink
drawingwhereinthe subjects, whicharetakenfromlife,are simplifieddownto their
basic structure and coloris limitedinitsusage. Chineseartistsdevelopedmethods and
techniquesfortheportrayalofspecific subjectsthatwerebasedon strict rulesof
depiction. Forinstance, intraditionalChinese paintingtheportrayal ofabirdorflower is
basedon a series ofmeticulously developed brushstrokesand movementsofthehandand
wrist. The resultingdrawingorpaintingisusuallycomprisedof aflattened imageor
imagesthatdoesnot place emphasis on suchWestern-basedconcepts asvolume, weight,
lightand shadow. Chineseartistsbelievedthatbyportrayinga subjectinthismanner
theycould capturetheinneressenceofit [Fig. 7]. Tothese artists,itwas moreimportant
tofocusonthesubject'sspiritualexistence andtrytoprojectthisconceptvisuallyrather
thanconcentratingonthesubject'soutward appearance.
m, B *
#Xl^jL
4k*
*^
"
V
I'
[image:25.547.94.456.132.373.2]Wr.
&'4
Fig. 7. Wu ChangshuoFlowers,1910.
Myattractionto thiskindof artworkisnotpurelyaesthetic. I enjoytheartwork
for its simplicityandthegraphic quality itexudes,but I alsoaa^nire and aminfluenced
bytheChineseartists'
searchforknowledge andthepursuitofacertainlevel of
perfectionthroughrepetition and practiceoftechnique. I seeacorrelationbetweenthis
method oflearningandmyown searchforakindofperfectionthroughrepeated actions
andtechniques. In myownwork,I very clearly set standardsbasedon aestheticsfor
myselftofollowwithregardtoeachspecific series andpracticedmytechniqueover and
overinordertoattainalevelof perfectioninmymind.
I needto take a momentheretoclarifywhatI meanby "perfect". Theterm
"perfect"
canbeinterpretedinanumber ofdifferentways, but formost people"perfect"
istypicallyassociated withtheideathatsomethingis flawless. I amusingthe termhere
toexpress whatIfeeltobeapersonalideal andindividualinterpretationofthework and
process. Myintentionwastopush myselftoa point wheretheimagesIproduced could
berefined nofurther. Seeninthis way,perfectionmeant akindof self-satisfactionthat
I'dtrulymadethebestpossibleefforttoproducemyart. Mylevelof perfectionhadto
bebasedonsomething; adegreebywhichIwasjudgingwhether or not a serieswas
working. Thephysical satisfaction orcomfortI experiencedwasnot attainableunlessthe
outcome,meaningtheimagebeingproduced,wastomyliking. As avisualartist,I had
tobasemyjudgmentas towhethersomethingwasworking or not onwhatIwas
producingaesthetically. Inthe end, likeChineseartists, thevisual resultiswhatIwas
strivingforthroughpractice oftechnique. If IfeltthatI couldattainthissatisfaction
physicallywithoutthe visuals,thentherewouldbeno pointin creatingart.
Chineseartwork constitutesmyfirstrealexposureto theart ofAsia,butoverthe
yearsmyinteresthasextendedfurther intootherregions and countriesformallyreferred
toas"Oriental". Withinthelastseveralyears,I'vestudiedJapaneseart, specifically, the
woodblock prints oftheUkiyo-egenre. Theseworks, whichderivemuch oftheirstyle
andphilosophy fromtheart ofChina,arecharacterizedbyflat, simplifiedformsthat
demonstrateahighlydecorativequality.
The Ukiyo-egenreisdividedintotwo timeperiods: theEdo Periodfromthe late
1670'stoabout 1867, andtheMeijiPeriod from 1867 tocirca 1912. Ukiyo,meaning,
"floatingworld",isa referencetotheyoungculturethatflourished inthecities ofEdo
(moderndayTokyo),Kyoto andOsaka. Theseartistscombined restrictedcolorwith
extremely intricatepatterns anddesigns,usuallyincorporatingblackoutlinetoconfine
theirshapes [Figs. 8,9]. Subjectsincludedlandscapes,the theaterand pleasurequarters.
Often,Ukiyo-e artistswouldportraya personwearingafinelydetailedgarment, withthe
[image:27.547.91.464.107.414.2]figure itselfrepresentedbyafewdarkoutlines. This simplifyingofthehumanformwas,
Fig. 8.
Kunisada The Hour oftheSnake,1856.
Fig. 9.
Kunisada The Fifty-Three Stations ofthe Tokaido,1852.
likethatusedbytheChinese,somethingtheJapaneseartists stroveforinan effortto
capturetheinnerqualities oftheirsubjects ratherthantheirtrue outward appearance.
Ukiyoisalso ahomonymforthe term"SorrowfulWorld", whichrefersto theearthly
plane ofdeathandrebirthfromwhichBuddhistssought
release.1
Morerecently,I'vebecomeaware ofcontemporaryJapaneseartists including
Takashi Murakami andYoshitomo Nara. Theworkoftheseartistshas its influence in
Japanese comicbookart or
"manga"
as well ascartoons, posters, and signage. In
Murakami's Super FlatManifesto,hestates, "Theworld of thefuturemightbe likeJapan
istoday
-superflat. Society, customs, art,culture: all areextremelytwo-dimensional."2
Isee a connectionbetweenthistypeofphilosophyandmyown work. Forinstance,my
Hand+HeadFold-Oversas well astheTony-Heads,withtheirstarkblackoutline and
almostcartoonishappearance,are similartoJapanesesigns andpictograms which canbe
foundall over cities such asTokyo.
Murakamitoohasworkedwith repetitionin hisownwork,usingtheimageshe
creates as statements onthenotion oftheindividuallivingamongthemasses. Printssuch
asFlower (Superflat) (2003) [Fig.10]andKiller Pink(2005) [Fig. 11] employ identical
images,butinseparate ways. Flower(Superflat) utilizes abundantflower/humanface
imagerycrammedtogetherforthe purpose offillingtheentireareaofthepictureplane.
Whilethesame asFlower (Superflat),theimageryofKiller Pinkis lessplentiful. Inthis
work,Murakamiincreasesthesizeoftheflower/faceforms, showingthemin close-up
andspreadingthem out, leavingmoreroomfornegative space. Theimageryofboth
worksiscomposedofthesameflower/facesymbolrepeatedmanytimes, withtheonly
[image:28.547.82.264.407.589.2]differenceamongthembeingcolor and size.
Fig. 10.T.Murakami Flower(Superflat),2003 Fig. 11. T. Murakami KillerPink,2005.
[image:28.547.281.459.408.587.2]Murakamicontinuesthis theme of repetitioninthetwo prints, Louis Vuitton Eye
LoveSuperflat, Black(2003) [Fig. 12] and Louis Vuitton Eye LoveSuperflat, White [Fig.
13]. Thesetwo works, whichdepictsimple designsandsymbols, arevirtually identical
exceptforthedifferingcolorarrangements: ablack backgroundfortheformerand a
whitebackgroundforthelatter.
+
+
+
+
+
+
A. 4.
^
x <+,:
?
k
[image:29.547.65.473.190.430.2], <mm>
:
<$?it
^
+" +?
Fig. 12. Takashi Murakami5/acA,2003. Fig.13. Takashi Murakami White,2003.
Murakami'sworkoften carrieswithit thethemeofmassproductionaswayof
commenting onhisown society's obsessionwithconsumerism andtheJapanese' loveof
allthingsmaterial. Throughhisart,Murakamicreatessculptures, paintings,drawings,
toys,blow-updolls,books and videosthatfocusonbright, eye-catchingimagery,which
are reminiscent oftheseemingly infinitenumberof materialproducts availableto the
Japanesepeople. Alloftheseartworks arecommerciallyreproducedforMurakami who
marketsthem tothepublic.
Though Asianarthas hada profound impactonmyrecentwork,Iamstillvery
interested inmuchthatEuropeandAmerica havetooffer. Oneartist whohashada
significantinfluenceonmyrecent workistheAmerican Jonathan Borofsky. His
26
IL V Jk
1"
^r
+
*L
-y
?
15
?
4"?
K
<>
X
<
-4*
+y <i* *
sr
<+-)
*5*O
c
J- A
?
>
X
?
X
X
A & A. <
f
1
[image:29.547.63.291.194.411.2]conceptual methodsofcreatingwereparticularlyinfluentialbeginningwithmy
Handprintseries.
Borofsky(b. 1942) isregarded as one ofthepioneers ofinstallationart,and more
precisely artthatis labeled "site specific". Heisalsoknown forworkthatis purely
conceptualinnature.Borofsky's conceptual modeofcreatingisparticularlyevidentin
oneofhisearlier workstitledCountingFrom 1 To 3227146 [Fig. 14]. Basedalmost
solelyonthenotion ofrepetition, Borofsky's34-inch highstackof plain8
V2"
x 11"
graph papercontained numbersgoingfrom1 intothemillionswrittenonthepages.
Borofsky gaveupartin favorofcounting fulltime. The artistsaidthathewasinterested
inthe consecutive natureofcountingandthefact thatnumbersare suchan
Fig.14. JonathanBorofsky CountingFrom 1 To 3227146.
[image:30.547.171.384.325.630.2]part ofeveryday life. Hestates,"Numbers arelikeGod. Theyconnect usalltogetherin
away nothingelsedoes. Like
magic."3
Borofskycontinuedwiththeprojectforseveral
years,butexpanded uponitbysketchinganddoodlingonthepagesashewas counting.
Eventually,thosesketchesbecamethe artist's mainfocus,buthedidnotstop counting
altogether. Countingas a projectmayhavecometoanend,butBorofskycontinuedto
countbyusingnumbers as awayto signhisdrawings. He simplycarried onfromthe
lastnumber he hadwritten onthegraph paperandusedthesubsequent numbersashis
signature on most ofhis laterartwork.
Anothercharacteristic ofBorofsky'sworkisthatitcannotbelabeledasbelonging
toanyparticular style. Hisworkis essentiallymulti-facetedintermsofthemediahe
uses andtheprojectsheundertakes. Notonetorestricthimselftoonlyoneformof
art-making, Borofskyhasbeen knowntoworkindrawing,painting, sculpture, printmaking,
video, film,soundproductionand ahostofothermedia. I feela connectiontothis
mannerofcreatingartbecausealthoughI primarilywork withtwo-dimensional media,I
donotwishtolimitmyselftoone ortwospecificstyles. EachprojectIworked onfor
mythesiswasverydifferent fromtheonethatcamebeforein bothprocess andimagery
created.
Borofsky'
s abilitytocarryoutprojects likeCountingisrepresentative ofthe
artist'sextraordinarysense ofdisciplineasit isappliedtohisart andlife. To countday
inanddayoutwithoutfail forseveral yearsdemonstratesadrivethatcanbe describedas
obsessiveinnature. To me,disciplineisvery importantand remains anecessity, which
extendsintomuch ofmy dailylife. Iamthe typeofperson who needs a certain amount
ofstructureinmylife, soitwouldonlymakesenseforthistofilter intomymethodsfor
creatingart. Like manypeople,I gothroughcertaindailyrituals. One very important
dailyritualIhaveisexercise. For manyyears nowI havedevotedacertain amountof
time everydaytoworkingout. Thisdailyritualhasgottentothepoint ofbeing
automatic,somethingI don'tthinkabout orquestion,Ijust do it. Myhabit forexercise
grew out of a needtokeepmybodyinshapefollowing severalmajorinjuries. Iam
drivenbytheneedtobe functionalinlifeand ratherthanrelyingdrugs,theexercise
servesto keepmephysically sound and abletodothethingsIwanttodo,including
makingart. Asaresult,if Idonot exercise and maintainthatlevelofdisciplineand
functionality,Ifeelasif I'mlosingcontrol.
Likeexercise, art, especiallydrawing,requires a certain amount of practice or
timespentdoingthephysicalactinorderfortheartisttoremainadept atit. Formyself,
ifIrefrainfromdrawingforanextendedperiod,Ibecome"rusty"whenIreturntoitand not abletoproduce attheartisticlevels I have formyself. If Iceasedrawingforawhile,
I'malways abletoreturntomy formerdesirablelevel,butnotwithoutmuch practice.
Hypothetically,if I'dtakenanextendedleavefroma series andthen tried toreturnit
immediately,Iwouldhavebeenunsuccessful. Iwouldhave hadto take time towork
back upto thatparticularlevel ofart making.
These levelsrefertofeelingsIhave in mymind astowhatIthinkmyart should
look like. Again,it ismatterofpersonaltasteastowhether ornot adrawingorpainting
I've creatediswhatIconsidertobe"good."
Sometimestheselevelsare not permanent
inthemindofthe artist and change overtime. Frequently, I will createsomethingthatI
thinkis first-rate and experience aparticularamount of excitementand sense of
accomplishment. Then Iwill putitawayand notlookatitagainfora certain amount of
time,returntoit, andconsideritsub par. Allofmyseriesemployed abstraction ofthe
figure insomewayor anotherandIhaddifferentstandardsforeachthatwerebased on
how I feltatthe timeoftheircreation.
Ina number ofways,creatingarthas been formecomparabletoakindof
physicalact, likeexercise. When Iwasworkingon a projectthatwouldemploya
particular refinedtechnique,I could notjustcomeinfresheveryday andproduce right
away. Eachdaily session of workinvolved a certain amount of"warmup"
timewherein
Iwouldhavetodo afewpractice piecesbeforeI gotinto agrooveorrhythm. I would
see eachdrawingorpaintingthatI made as a repetition or
"rep"
asit isreferredtoin
exerciseterms. Withcertain projectsIfeltas thoughIwasinconstantmotion, going
through the steps neededtocreate eachindividualpiece of work. Ibelievethediscipline
that was involvedin creatingthe serieshelpedmetobegintheprojects and sustainmy
interestthroughouttheirduration. Eachproject represents akindoftemporaryobsession
forme whereinIwas so engrossed intheprocessthatIhadtokeepgoinguntilmy
interest wavered. AttimeswhileI wascreatingtheTony-Heads,IfeltasthoughI were
workinginanAbstract Expressionist manner,something I'dhadyears of experience
with.
Approachingartina physical waywassomething I veryclearlyintendedandI
think thishadadirectinfluenceonmy decisiontousefigurative imagery. Like Willem
DeKooning, averyphysicalpainter,Iwantedtoemploy gestural sweepsofthebrushto
displaythepresence ofmyhandmakingthe marks,butalsoconveyahumanelementto
theimagery. De Kooning's Womanseries ofthe 1950's [Fig. 15]depicts human females
Fig. 15. Willem deKooningWoman1,1950-52.
buried beneaththeartist'sexceedinglyheavy,physicalbrushworkandthickly applied
paint. Asviewers,wecanlookathispaintings andactuallytrace themarkshemade.
Though De Kooning'sworkhas beencharacterized asmaking arathermisogynist
comment onthecultural stateof womenduringthemid-TwentiethCentury,healso
desiredtoshowhisownphysical beingwithinhisart. Hecreated paintingsthatportray
thehuman formthroughimageryand atthesametime,puthimselfintotheworkby
makingthepresence ofhisownhandevident.
Conclusion
EachprojectIworked onfor mythesiswasan essential componentinthe
construction ofthelargerbodyof work. Eachseries represented a certain amount of
learningthatIconsidervitaltomydevelopmentasanartist. EventheseriesthatI
deemed lesssuccessful wereimportantlearningexperiencesthataided meinbetter
understandingthekindof artIhavechosentopursue. If Ithought thata particular
techniqueI wastryingout was notworking,I would abandonitand move onto thenext
onewiththeknowledgeIhadgained. I'vediscoveredthatworking inthismanner
requires a certain amount oftimespentinordertorealize ifa projectis goingtosucceed.
Trialand error remains one ofthe cornerstones ofmyprocess andIsometimesdonot
realizethata seriesisn'tworkinguntilI'veproduced alargenumber ofdrawingsand
paintings.
TheaspectIammost critical of wasmythesisexhibition. Theinstallationofthe
showwasin itselfan education andIlearneda greatdealaboutthe typeof artistI had
becomeas result oftheworkIproduced. Workingrepetitively,andforthatmanner
conceptually,wassomethingthatwasentirelynewtome. Consequently,whenitcame
time toinstallthe show,Iwas abit lost. I hadalotof choicestodealwithregardingthe
mannerinwhichthework should or couldbe displayed. Displayhadbeenanissue for
methroughout thethesis,but itwas somethingthatI really only hadtoaddressduring
critiques. WiththeshowI nowhadtomake some concretedecisionsabout problemsthat
previously had only been inthebackofmymind. Thiswasthemosttroubling and
confusingquestion: HowdoI displaythiswork?
Theproblem stemmedfromthefactthatIhadavery largeamount ofdrawings
andpaintingstochoosefrom anddecidehowtodisplay. Thisbringsupanimportant
issuethatI'd beendealingwith sincetheHandprintseries. When working inmultiples, I
was confrontedwiththequestionof whetherthepiecesthatmadeupa series couldbe
displayedontheirown asindividualworksordidtheyneedtobe displayedtogetheras a
group? Myconclusion wasthatit reallydependsontheseries.
The Handprintproject was such a vast and varied seriesthat insomecases,
finishedprints couldin factworkasindividualpieces. Still,therewere somethatweren't
as successful as others. Thiswas not a problembecausetheso-calledbadprints would
merge withinthelargergroupas a whole. Amongstthe 300+printsthatI'dcreated,
groups within groupshadbeenformedwhichcouldverywellhavebeen displayed
separately. However,Ibelievethat displayingall ofthemtogethergavetheseriesits
visceral impact. The Fold-Overseriesessentiallyfunctionedthesamewayasthe
Handprints inthat some ofthepaintings workedontheirownand somedidnot.
The groupaesthetic also appliedtotheDrip-Paintings,butastheprojectevolved,
itbecamemore complex andthepaintingsbecamemoreindividualized. This
individualizationappliedmainlyto thelaterpaintingsintheseriesthatwere spreadout
over several sheets of paper. Withthese paintings,it becamemoredifficulttoinclude
them withthesmaller piecessimplybecauseoftheamount of spacetheyrequiredfor
display.
Theprojectthatrelied most ongroupdisplaywastheTony-Headseries,primarily
thelarger drawings. Thesequence of actions withthebrushyieldeddrawingsthatwere
very similarvisually. Seeingonehead displayedonitsown wouldprobablynotelicit
much of a reactionfrom aviewer. ButI wasconcentratingonquantity, scale and sheer
numberswiththisprojectinparticular. Accordingly,thegroupdynamicworkedbest.
Thesefactorsaffectedmyplanningofthethesis show, butessentially,Iwas not
interestedindisplayinganyofthedrawingsorpaintings individually. Ihadcreatedthese
pieces as groups and wantedthem tostayinthatformatfortheexhibition.
Forthe showIhadsecuredtheglassdisplay cases onthe thirdfloordirectly
abovetheBevierGalleryatRIT. Imadethedecisiontouse this spacebecause ofthe
amount of workthatI wishedtoinclude. Itwassimplynot possibleformetoshowall of
myworkinthegallerybecausetherewere eleven other graduate studentsinthe
exhibition andIneeded quite abitofwall space. I was requiredtouse some ofthespace
intheBevierGallery andthisconsisted oftwoportable walls pushedtogetherand a
couple oflectern-shapedpedestals. Iused one sideofthedoublewallstoinstallthe
Handprintproject andtheothersidetoexhibit somedrawings I hadmade. The
lectern-pedestalswereusedto holdsix sketchbooksthatIincluded becauseIthought the
drawingscontained withinthemcouldhelptoillustratetherepetitivethemeI'dbeen
concentratingon. IwassatisfiedwiththeHandprintdisplay, but Ithought theother side
ofthewallwas unsuccessful. Itseemedratherbarrenwith onlythreedrawingsonitand
thelecternsmadethesketchbooks seem out ofplace.
The onlyconcretedecision Imadebeforeinstallingtheworkonthe thirdfloor
wasthatIwantedtohavethelargeTony-Heads, doneon 16'pieces ofphoto-backdrop
paper, linethe two shorter glasscases,runningthelengthof each wall. Thesetwocases
were of equal length,roughly 45'. Mypurpose wastohavetheHeadsvisible fromthe
gallerybelow. However,I didnotwanttheTony-Headstobefullyvisiblefromthe
gallery,butratherslightlyobscuredbytheledge formedbytheopen-ceiling gapofthe
gallery. Essentially,my intentwastohavetheHeadsappeartobe peekingovertheledge
ifone wereto standineitherthefrontorbackofthegallery. Assuch,I hadtohangthem
attheproperheight. Iftheyweretoohighortoolow, thepeekingeffect wouldn'twork.
Aftersometrialanderror,Iwas abletoachievethisand wasverypleasedwiththeway it
turnedout.
Mymain concernwas withthemiddle glass case onthe thirdfloorwhere mostof
thework wasondisplay. Thiswasthe longestofthe three walls, about56', andprovided
thelargestspacefor display. Iwasverytornabout what artworktoinclude inthis space
andhow itshouldbeexhibited. I knewthatIwantedtoincludecertainthings,butwas
unsure about other works. Inthe end,Iresolvedtocarryouttheentireinstallationwith
no setplaninmind. Thisprovedtobe very difficult.
I hadseparated outeachseriesonthewall. Whilesome oftheprojects worked
wellinthedisplay, othersdidnot. Iwas satisfiedwiththedisplayoftheFold-Over
paintings and anotherpiece, theBillsProject. ButafterIwasfinished,Irealizedthat
therewas alotofunusedwall spacethatdiminishedtheexhibitas a whole. Inaddition,
theoveralllackof cohesivenessamongthe series astheyrelatedtoeach otherwas,I
think, confusingtoviewers.
Mostofthepieceshad beenhungrelatively quicklywithpush-pins. Myreason
forthismannerofhangingwasthatsincethepieces wereproducedquickly,Ithought
theyshouldbehunginawaythatwoulddemonstratethisaspect. Mygoal wastocreate
aninformalatmosphere withinthe installationthatwouldreflecttheprocessesI had
employedtoproducethework. Ultimately,Ifailedtoachievethisobjective andan
overall sense offormalitywasestablishedwiththeinstallationthatIfeltwasout ofplace
forthistypeof work. Itwasaveryneat andorderlyexhibitandIbelievethatwasthe
problem.
Myartworkessentiallyprojectsafeelingoftheunconventional. Itisultimately
conceptualinnatureand as such, itshouldbeexhibitedina mannerthatemphasizesthis
notion. I donotthink thiswas achievedwithmythesis show. However,I realizenow
thatIneededtogothrough thisexperience inordertounderstandthatthereisaproper or
atleastbetter way fortheworktobeexhibited. Althoughtheshowwasadisappointment
tomeoverall,itwasaverypositive learningexperienceforthefuture. Thus, Inowfeel
more confident andabletodealwithexhibiting thisartworkin itsfinished form.
Inow recognizethat this typeof artworkrequires a spacethatisopentonew
conceptsinartratherthanatraditionalgallery setting. Lookingbackonthe thesis show,
thechangesI wouldhavemadeinvolvemakingabetterefforttoillustratethecontrolled
chaosthatIexperiencewhenIproduce repetitively. Ifrepetitionisthemainideaofthis
work, thenit issomethingthat shouldbeemphasized.
InthefutureIwouldliketoexperiment withthedisplayoftheworkinvarious
ways. Oneofthe ideas I have isto takeworkfromseveral oftheseries and combineit in
averyunorganized, almosthaphazardstyle. I envisionobtainingalargewallspace and
crammingitwithdrawingsandpaintings untilthewallitselfdisappears behindthe
artwork. Iwouldalso tiketomovebeyondasimple wall-type ofdisplay,utilizing floor
space,tables, desks,shelves, etc.,inan efforttodisplayworkson paperinastacked
manner.
Final Thoughts
Asa result ofmyexhibitionandthefactthatitwas supposedtorepresentthe
culminationofmy thesis,Irealizedthatmyoriginalintention forthethesiswasunclear
tomyselfas well astoothers. I knewthatthe thesiswas supposedtoserve as an
investigationof anideaandIhad a ratherdifficulttime, atleast inthebeginning,of
clearlyidentifyingthatidea. Withregardto the threeaspects ofprocess, series and
repetition, Iwasn'tnecessarilytryingtoexplore whether onewas moreimportantthan
theothers. Yet,whenIbegan my secondyear, IthoughtIwas mostinterested inthe
processofmakingart. Inthis paper,I've goneinto detail abouttheactual processesI
underwentto createthe artwork, butasImoved closerto theconclusion ofmythesis
work, itseemedthatrepetition wasreallythemostimportant thingtome. Lookingback,
itwastheactofrepeatingtoachieve a meditative sense of rhythm and alevelof
perfectionintechnique thatbroughtmethemostjoyand satisfaction asan artist.
OneoftheconceptsIstruggled withindisplayingthework was whethertoshow
orillustratetheprocessfromstarttofinish. Thisapproach meantthatIwouldhave
shown allofthedrawingsor paintingsfroma givenseries regardless of whetherIthought
theyweregoodorbad. Bydisplayingthework onawall, theviewerwouldprobablynot
havemuchdifficulty decipheringtheoverall conceptbeingpresented. However,during
thecourse ofthethesisI cametorealizethatalthough processwassomething I was
indeedvery interestedin,itwasnottheidea I ultimatelywishedtoconveytoviewers.
Consequently,I focusedprimarilyonshowingthedrawingsand paintingsthatIfeltbest
representedaparticular series. Thisisa conceptdirectlyrelatedtoaesthetics andthe
feelingthatasanartist,I amstillveryconcernedwithcreating visually pleasingartwork.
Inconclusion,I believethethesishastaughtmethat process, andinparticular
repetition,remain aprimarymeans oflocatingmeaning, functionandformwithin visual
artwork.
Endnotes
Wikipedia contributors,"Ukiyo-e,"
Wikipedia, The FreeEncyclopedia,
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/inde\.php?title=Ukiyo-e&oldid=5978347S.
TakashiMurakami, SuperFlat (Tokyo: Madra Publishing Co. Ltd.,2000), p.4.
3
AnnCurran, "Jonathan Borofsky NobodyKnows HisName, EverybodyHas HisNumber,"
CarnegieMellonMagazine, Spring2002, www.cmu.edu/magazine/02spring/borofsky.html.
List ofIllustrations
Fig. 1:Anthony Trinchera,MeatHooks, 2003,mixedmedia, threehundred 4x6 in.
indexcards.
Fig. 2: Trinchera,detailofFig. 1.
Fig. 3:Trinchera, Untitled(DripPaintings),2004,acryliconpaper, varyingsizes.
Fig. 4: Trinchera,Gorilla Gods, 2004,latexandblackgessoonpaper,sixteen 19x25 in.
sheets.
Fig. 5: Trinchera,Hand+Heads, 2004,acrylic andlatexonpaper,four 19x25 Vi in.
sheets.
Fig. 6: Trinchera,TonyHeads, 2005,latexonpaper, two22 x30 in. sheets.
Fig. 7: WuChangshuoFlowers, 1910,watercolor andinkonpaper,artcyclopedia.com, www.artcyclopedia.com/nationalities/chinese.html (accessed June 15, 2006).
Fig. 8: Kunisada, The Hour oftheSnake, 1856, woodblockprint, Hans OlofJoha