• No results found

Repetition/Series

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share "Repetition/Series"

Copied!
45
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Rochester Institute of Technology

RIT Scholar Works

Theses

Thesis/Dissertation Collections

2006

Repetition/Series

Anthony Trinchera

Follow this and additional works at:

http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses

This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please [email protected].

Recommended Citation

(2)

ROCHESTERINSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

A Thesis Submittedto the

Faculty

of

The College of

Imaging

Arts and Sciences

In

Candidacy

forthe Degreeof

MASTER OF FINE ARTS

Repetition/Series

By

Anthony

Trinchera
(3)

Approvals

Chief Advisor _ ... Do<..!r ... TJ..!hw.:o~m~a=-s .!...!Rc!... L!=..!i.:;;lg.!...!h~tf~o~o~t _ _ _ (please type)

Thomas R. Lightfoot (Signature)

Date:

Associate Advisor _-=E::..:.i,:.::1 e:...;:e:..:..n:....F:....;e=..;e::..:n...:..;e::"'Y<-=.B..:::u.::.s:...:.h:...:.n.::.e"",-Ii _ _ (please type)

(Signature)

Date:

Associate Advisor Luvon Sheppard (please type)

(Signature)

Date:

Dep~nt~ernon_~D~o~n~a~l~d~A~r~d~a~y _ _ _ _ (please type)

(Signature)

Date:

Thesis Reproduction Permission Statement:

A signed and dated ''Thesis Reproduction Permission" statement must be included on or after the title page and signature approval page.

I understand that I must submit a print copy of my thesis or dissertation to the R1T Archives, per current RIT guidelines for the completion of my degree. I hereby grant to the Rochester Institute of Technology and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in all forms of media in perpetuity. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis or dissertation. I also retain the rightto use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation.

Print Reproduction Permission Granted:

I, Anthony Trinchera , hereby grant permission to the Rochester Institute of Technology to reproduce my print thesis or dissettation in whole or in part. Any reproduction will not be for commercial use or profit.

(4)

Introduction

Thebasis formythesisisa minimalistapproachtomakingartthrough the

exploration ofprocess, series and repetition. Thematically,thecore oftheartworkthatI

produce revolves around a simplificationoftheformsanddesignsthatI chooseto

portray. Artistically,I aminterested invarious qualitiesincludingline,flatnessofshapes

and simplified color range astheyare appliedto thetwo-dimensional. Thismannerof

working stems fromadesireIhavetoforgorealisticdepictionofmy subjectsinfavorof

a more abstracted approach.

Workingwithin aneducationalframework, Ipreferredtorelyonmy intuitive

abilities and utilize repetitivetechnique fortheproduction of artwork. Havingabandoned

anypreset notions ofimageandform,I soughttofocusontheoutgrowthofideasthat

sprung fromapurelyformaland mediadrivenmethodology. Itwasmyintentionto use

repetitious methods ofworking inordertoexploredeepersubconsciousissueswithin

myself andinvestigatetherolethatprocess plays inaccessingpersonal content.

Fourprojectsbest illustrate mythesisgoals. Sinceprocessisaprimaryelement

involvedinmythesis, Iwilldescribethesevariousprojectsin detailandtalkaboutthe

many issuesthataroseduringtheevolution ofthese series. Ishall also discussmy

inspirationsforwork,cite arthistoricalreferencesand analyzemythesis exhibition. I

willformacritical evaluationofthe work,discussingtherelative successes andfailures

(5)

Four Series

1. Handprints

BBffBf" $gg

ISftMFSBBi*! 47STiV5S|i i

X ' -tfiS

1* ! ItllBM'tg

li^JoSIKB

&ff-3SH*!B3B

3g&-"4S8M!!

*-.*a-a ua

a2*s*H max

w^ea^s was

i&K* B-!IMB!*iaSf

Fig. 1. Mearfloofa,2003. Fig. 2. Mea< HooAs (detail).

The basis for mythesisworkbegan roughly midwaythroughmy firstquarterat

RIT. Iwasdealingwithalotoffrustration because I hadn'tcreated artonaregularbasis

foraboutthreeyears andfound it very difficulttoplunge back intoalifethatwouldsee

artas adailyoccurrence. IcametoRITthinkingthatI could gobackto thekindof

art-making I'ddoneseveral yearsbefore, namelylargenon-representational oil paintings. I

hadtried thisapproachtomakingartinthebeginningofmyfirstquarter atRIT,but

attemptingtobeginagainfromwhereI'dleftoff several years beforeproved

unsuccessful. Toomuchtimehadpassedformetostill retaininterest inmyprevious

mannerofworking,andIfeltasthoughI hadtosomehow regainmyenthusiasmforart

ingeneral. AtthetimeIthoughttryingsomethingnew andcompletelydifferentwould

helptoinspiremecreatively andrecapturemypassionformakingart.

I madearather spontaneousdecisiontouse4"x

6"

index cards asmy working

surface. I'dusedthecardsforan earlier classassignment and realizedthatI enjoyed

themas aworkingsurfacebecauseoftheirsmallformatand sense ofimmediacy. This

[image:5.547.269.481.109.270.2]
(6)

formatwas somethingthatIwas not usedtoandit forcedmetoadjustmymanner of

workingto suitthe sizelimitation. Sincethearea ofthecard surface wassominiscule,I

hadtodecide howtoutilizethespacethrough technique. I couldnot executeintricate,

detailed drawingsor paintings oncards,butatthesametime,I wantedtotrysomething

atypicalofwhatI wouldnormally havedone.

Actingonimpulse,Iplaced some cards onthefloorofmy studio and crushedbits

of a charcoal stickintothemwithmyfoot. Iexploredvarious patternsanddesigns on

several cards andthengathered some oftheblack dust fromthecrushed charcoal sticks.

Thisdustwas combined with water and smeared ontothecardsusing my hands. Itried

manydifferentwaysofapplyingthewet mediato thesurface ofthecards andeventually

settledoncreatingindividualprints ofmyhands,palmsidedown. Ienjoyedthe

immediacyand ease ofthe process,whichallowed metoworkrapidly makingoneprint

after another. I foundtheimage createdbymy handtobeaninterestingabstraction

representationthatretainedfigurativecharacteristics. Aesthetically,each print was aflat

formwithvirtuallynodetail,butremainedeasilyrecognizable as ahand. Mostofthe

printswerecomposedof six elements: mypalmandthefiveseparatefingers. Yet I did

varytheimagestoa certain extentbyprintingsinglefingersandnopalm or vice versa.

SometimesI wouldsimplyprintonefingerbyitselfortrydifferentcombinations.

Throughthisprocess, IbelievethatIwasworkingthroughadesiretoportrayafigurative

element withinmyworkusingmyselfastheimpetus.

Astheprojectprogressed,manychanges occurred with regardtoimagery and

materials. Throughrepetition,I was abletopushtheinherentpotential ofthecardformat

(7)

processtogrow andtransform,and assuch,I initiatedvarious changesincludingthe

employment ofblackacrylic paint and collage. Usingthisnew mediahadadirecteffect

ontheimagery beingproduced andfostered changesto theprintedimagesthemselves. I

foundthatmakinga print with acrylic paint asopposedto usingwet, groundcharcoal

yieldeddifferentresultsbecausethereaction ofeach, when coupled withtheindexcards,

was notthesame. The resultingformstookondifferentcharacteristicsdictatedbythe

media. Forexample, a print madewithcharcoalwould produceasomewhatlighterand

blurrierimagethanone madewithacrylic paint.

Whentheprojectwasfinished, I'dcreatedabout300+handprints [Fig. 1]thatI

affixedtomy studiowallduringthecourseoftheseries. Theprintsdisplayedmultiple

variationsonform,techniqueand contentall basedaroundthelikenessofmyhand [Fig.

2]. Since I'dworkedonthemajorityoftheprintsina rapidmanner,Iwas notalways

aware ofwhat wasoccurringwithintheprintsthemselves. Generally,Iwould make a

print, setitaside,andthenimmediatelymovetoonto thenextone. However,takingthe

timetoobservethefinishedseries allowed metorecognizethatI wasdealingwith

imagerybasedonfigurativeand spur-of-the-momentactions. The printsthemselveshad

avery"quick"lookaboutthem,meaning itwasvisuallyevidentthatI'dcreatedthemat a

briskpace. This

"fast"

lookwasrecognizablethroughsplattersofpaint or wetcharcoal,

andmovements ofmy handonthepapersurface,which created"smeared"or

"wiped-across"

qualities.

Throughplacementonthe wall,I could see series within seriesoccurringand

groupingsthatwere createdmerelybychance and random positioning. Intermsof

(8)

particulargroupand represented a specific portionoftime thatI'dspentonthem. I did

not set outtocreate self-portraiture per se or depictthehuman formrealistically,but my

ownindividualrepresentationhad beenmade soclearlythatIcannotdenythepersonal

accountbeingportrayed. Ultimately Iwascreatingavery personal statementusing

repetitiontoshow eachindividualmarkI'dmade. Ithinktheentireseriesfunctionsasan

account of a period withinmylifethatsawmyenthusiasmforartretvirning. Inaway,it

serves as anin-depth document fromwhichI couldtraceapassageoftimebythemarks

myhand hadmade. Bylookingatcertain groups ofcards,I could recounttheamount of

time spentduringa particular session oridentifywhena change ortransformationto the

processhadoccurred.

Theentire experiencehad been veryliberatingformebecause Inolonger felt

heldbackbyanypersonal artistic constraintsor expectations. Itwasveryfreeingtocast

aside certainpreviouslyheldnotionsIhadaboutmakingart such ascreatingrealistic or

visuallycorrectrepresentationsof subjectmatter,i.e., figures, objects. Inaddition,I

wasn'tconcerned withtraditional aspects relatedtoart such ashigh-gradematerials and

the "proper"usage and application of media InthebeginningI didn'tcare or even give

muchthought to themannerinwhichthefinishedprintslooked. Inthat respect, Iwas

moreinterested in repeating certainprocess-driven steps. Iwasworking spontaneously

and atsucharapid pacethatifa printdidn'tlook particularlyappealing, Iwouldsimply

setitaside and move ontothenextone. Atthesametime,throughexploration and

experimentation,I became invested inthismethod ofproducing inmultiples.

Oneofmyother previousnotionsformakingart wasthe traditionalmanner of

(9)

creatingsingle, individualpaintings,drawings,prints,orsculpturesthatcouldbe

regarded asindependentefforts. Withrepetition, I feltthateachindividualprint

functionedas a part of agroupaesthetic. Inotherwords,I didn'tregardtheprints as

separatefinishedpiecesthatcould standontheirownasindividualworksofart. The

power ofthe series camefromthe sheerquantityofprints,which worktogethertoforma

largerwhole.

ItwasduringthesesessionsthatI firstexperienced atruefeeling of rhythm

throughrepetition. By"rhythm"I meanthatI'dachieveda senseof comfort withmy

work process andaphysical connectionto theactofcreatingart. Havingcome froman

Abstract Expressionistbackgroundand assomeone whoenjoysphysicalactivity,being

"in-the-moment"

and"one"withtheartworkisa sensationthatI veryoften strivefor.

Frequently,theprocess ofcreatingartis formebothphysical as well as psychological.

FortheHandprintProject,I wasusing myphysical self as atoolforcreatingthe work,

withmy handfunctioningasthedirectmeansfortheapplication ofmediato thesurface.

Mydecisiontoworkinthismannerstemmedfromafeelingof physicalcomfortin

placingwetcharcoalorpaint ontomy handsandformingtheimages directly. My

interest inthismethod wasestablishedverysoon afterthefirst fewprintsbecausethe

visual qualityofthehandprints combined withthecorporeal component neededto

producetheimageswasveryappealingtome. Ienjoyedthecreation oftheprints

physically because Iwasabletomove about as opposedtositting inone place and

working. Thisfeelingof movementcontributedto theexecution oftheprintsinmany

ways. Forexample,Imade someprintsthatcouldonlyhave beenexecutedbystanding

(10)

hardonto a card. Alloftheseactions were anefforttoachieve certain visualeffects, but

atthesametime,IcouldtellbythemovementsIwasmakingifa print wouldbe

successful or not. In away, itwasverycomparabletoexerciseandthefeelingof

satisfaction one can experience whenthebodyandmind arein fixedunison.

The Handprintseries ended whenIbecamenolonger interested in thestyle ofthe

imagery andtheprocess neededtoproducethework. I feltasthoughnothingmorecould

be donewiththeseries andthat thelimitsofthetechniquehad beenpushedasfarasI

couldtake them. After producing somanyprints, theexcitementI'dexperiencedatthe

beginninghadwornoff andIfeltitwastime tostartsomething different. Iwasstillvery

interestedin exploringrepetition, but Iwantedtochannelmyenthusiasm andenergy for

thismethodina newdirection.

Eachnewseries ofartworkthatIcreatedyieldeda personalchallenge,namely

findingatechniquethatwouldfitinwiththerepetitivemannerthatIwishedtocontinue.

Toworkrepetitivelymeanshavingthepatiencetodothesamethingover and over again.

Thiscanbecome verymonotonous, eventedious, soitwasimportant formetofind

techniques thatwouldbeinterestingenoughtoworkwith. Oneoftheproblems Ifaced

whenworkinginmultipleswasthat the techniqueinvolved hadtolend itselfto the

repetition. Thisexplorationledtomuch experimentation withmyartist materialsinorder

(11)
[image:11.547.123.424.78.306.2]

2. Drip-Paintings

Fig. 3. Untitled(DripPaintings),2004.

AftertheHandprintproject, I continuedtoworkrepetitivelyontheindexcards,

usingacrylic paintwith variousbrushes. Aftermuchexperimentation,I abandonedthe

practiceofapplyingpaintdirectlyto thecardswith abrushand settled on atechniqueof

bendingthecardslengthwiseinahalf-moonstyle anddippingtheminto a separate

containers of watertintedwithred,blueorpurple paint. AswiththeHandprints,I

wantedtokeepthecolor rangetoa minimum andtheforms simplistic sothatIcould

replicatetheprocess withease. When Ipulleda cardoutofthecontainer, Icould retain a

smallamountof water ontheshortend andtipit insuch awayastohavetheexcess

waterrundownthecenterlengthwise. Theresult was ahalf-moonstain ofdilutedacrylic

paintwithalineordripcomingoutofthecenter.

After Imade severaldozenofthesesmallindexcarddrip-paintingsinrapid

succession, Inoticedthat theseries waslackinga certain visual component. Ifoundthe

(12)

shapeI'dcreatedtobeaesthetically pleasing,buttheimageitselfwastooemptyand

simplistic,asif itwerejustaworkingexercise rather than afinishedpiece or partofa

series.

ThesolutionIcameupwith wastoadd a"highlight"toeachdampenedcard.

Thisconsisted of asmall, semi-circularblobofconcentrated, orstraight,paint appliedto

theintersectionofthehalf-moonstain andthedrip[Fig. 3]. Executed inthis manner, the

blobofpaintblendedinwiththe surroundingforms. Inoticedthatwith each changeI

made,myprocessbecamemorecomplexandinvolvedmore steps. Consequently,I

neededtoadjustmytechnique to suit eachnewmodification. IrealizedthatI neededto

work muchfaster because Ihadtoaddthepainthighlightwhilethesurface ofthecard

was stilldamp. TimingwaseverythingwiththisprojectandIpracticedthetechnique

repeatedly inordertoachieve thesense of rhythmthatI desired.

Withthisprojectinparticular, therewasakindof push-pullIwasexperiencing

with regardto theamount ofcontrolI actuallymaintained over what washappening. On

theonehand,Idevelopedthis techniquethroughtrial and errorandfeltcomfortable

overallwithit. However,Ineverfelt incomplete controlbecause Iwasworkingwiththe

effectthatgravitywashavingonthewater and paper. Thislackof control was exciting

tomebecause Iwasneveronehundredpercentsureof what wouldhappenwhenI tilted

thecards. Sometimes Imisjudgedandthewater woulddripinadirectionIhadn't

intendedresulting inaruinedcard. Therewas an elementof chanceinvolved, anditwas

almost asifIwerebettingonwhetherornotI couldbe successfulatthis technique. If I

(13)

with and could addto theseries. IfI wereincorrect, Iwouldhavetodealwiththe

frustrationofwastedtimeandeffort,somethingthatcouldbreak mysenseofrhythm.

This lackof control wasreinforced whenIenlargedthescaleof thepaintings. I

feltthatI'dpushedthepotentialoftheindexcardsfarenough and nolongerexperienced

the same sense of challengefromthe smallformat. By increasingthe scale, thedifficulty

inmakingthepaintings wouldintensifyandI would againbetestedinmyabilityproduce

thepaintingstomysatisfaction. Iwas also curiousto seetheresultsfrom using larger

quantities of paint andwater onbiggersheets of paper.

Iincreasedthe scalegradually,going from thesmall indexcards and somewhat

largerpiecesof papertobigger22"

x30"sheets. Iwantedtocontinue withthesame

basicshape,buttheincreasein scale required adifferentmanner ofcreatingtheprincipal

forms. Iwas unabletodipthe piecesof paperintothewaterbecause theyweretoobigto

fit intoa container. Asasolution,I decidedtoapplythedilutedpaintto thesurfacewith

alarge brush. The half-moonshape waseasyto recreate,butthechallenge was inthe

actualtiltingoftheselargersheets ofpaperand theapplicationofthehighlight. The

largesheets wereheavierandrequiredbothofmy handstosteadythepaper whileI

manipulatedthe dripdownthecenter. Itwasvery clumsy inthebeginningandIhadto

practicethisquite abitbefore Icould makeall ofthestepsworkinunison.

Acuriousvisualelementbecameapparentearlyonintheseries whenI was still

usingindexcards andexperimentingwiththehighlightarea. Icreatedthis shapepurely

outof experimentation ofmaterialsanddidnotintendforittoberepresentative ofany

particularsubject. However,InoticedthatwhenItook thefinishedpaintingswiththe

highlightadded andturned themhorizontally,theyappearedtohaveafigure-like quality.

(14)

Theshape oftheimagecombined withtheflesh-likecolors Iwasusingmadethe

half-moonform look likean abstractversionof awoman'sbreast inprofile. Thedrip

resembled averyelongatednipple, which appearedasthoughitwerebeingpulled right

offtheedge ofthepaper.

I believethatthis series, alongwiththeHandprintProject,representsapersonal,

albeitsubconscious, returnto thefigureas asource ofsubjectmatter. Ihadnotdoneany

in-depthstudiesofthehumanbodyforseveralyears, soIwasn'treadynordid I desireto

jumprightinand make paintingsbasedonproportionallycorrector realistic

representations. However,Iwas atthe timedoingsomefigurative drawingonalimited

basis,slowly working my way backtocomprehensive studies ofthehuman form. Ifelta

certain amountofcomfortin studyingasubjectI'dhadprevious experiencewithandI

believethisenjoymentinfluencedtheDripPaintings. The humanbodyhasalwaysbeen

a source offascination forme,butI'dnever explorediton as abstract alevelasIhad

withthisproject. I'vealwaysbeen drawntothefigurebecauseofmyinterestinphysical

activityandhowthehumanbodyfunctions,thatis,themechanics ofit.

Ithinkthatsubconsciously I desiredverymuchtoexplorethefigurein my

painting, but Iwantedtodo itrepetitivelyand createimagesthroughdistortionand

simplification ofform. Since I'dbeendrawingmyentire lifeandhad becomewell

versedinthisformoffigurative art,I believedI couldbranchout and make

representations inan unorthodoxmanner. As Ihadbefore,I didnot set concrete goalsfor

achieving these results, but insteadworkedthroughanintuitiveprocessbasedon

conceptsthatwerefamiliartome.

(15)
[image:15.547.334.489.105.316.2]

3.Fold-OverPaintings

Fig. 4. GorillaGods,2004. Fig. 5.Hand+Heads,2004.

For mynextproject,I againsought out anewtechnique touseforrepetition. As

withtheprevioustwo series, Iexperienced afeelingthatI'dtaken theprocess asfarasI

couldand nolonger desiredtowork withthesame method. Lookingback,Ican make

thevery clear observationthatmy desireandenthusiasmfor usingcertaintechniques

weresomewhatfleeting,lasting aslongasseveralmonths or as short as afewweeks.

Aftera certain amountoftimehadpassed, IwouldbegintofeelthatI'dexhausted allof

thepossibilitiesforaparticular repetitiveaction. Thesense ofmonotonyassociatedwith

repetitionandperformingthe same setof stepsrepeatedly wouldbegintowear onmeto

thepoint whereIcouldnolongercontinue. Eventually,myinterest forthese techniques

wouldrunitscourse. Iconsidermyuseofrepetitiontobea conceptbasedoncreating

artworkthroughmeansthatweretemporaryintheiremployment. Iwould work onthese

projectsat suchanintensepacethatmysessions seemedlikeshort,forcefulburstsof

[image:15.547.80.271.114.313.2]
(16)

creativitythatwouldlastseveral weeksor months. Oncetheenergywas expendedthe

project was over. Iwas unabletocontinue same methodforvery longand neededto

effect a changeinthemannerthatI created art. This is howIwouldmovefromone

projectto thenext.

I wasprimarilyconcerned withcreatingpaintingsinwaysthatwere unfamiliarto

me. I'dexperienced enjoymentfromthefindingof newtechniquesand wishedto

continue on a paththatwould sustain a sense of wondermentthroughdiscovery. Attimes

I wouldfeellikeaninventorwhohasmade a significantbreakthroughand experiences a

rushof excitementfromhavingdevelopedsomethingnew.

I beganthenextbodyofworkbyplacingsomelatexpaintinto 16oz. plastic

containers anddribblingitalittle bitat atimeontothesurface of some sheets of colored

paper. Mydecisiontouselatexwasbasedon severalfactors. Itwasreadily available

(I'd already hadsomein my possession) and couldbeusedinlargequantitiesfor

minimal expense. Inaddition,Iwasinterested inthethickqualityofthepaint. The

thicknessofthepaintdidnot allowforexcessivespreading(somethingIdidnotdesire),

but itwas stillfluidenoughforme createdesignsthroughpouringanddribbling actions.

After I'ddribbledadesignonthe paper,Iwouldfoldonehalfofthesheet over

andthenpullthe twohalvesapartinaRorschachink blotteststyle. Myarrival atthis

method wastheresultofrandomexperimentationwithmaterials andtimespentdeciding

iftheprocess wasinterestingenoughtocontinue. IhadtoaskmyselfifIwouldfeel

comfortable enough withthisnewfoundtechniqueandiftheimagesproduced were

visually satisfying. Ibased mysatisfactionabouttheimageson whatIconsideredtobe

aestheticallyinteresting. Asanartist,Ihave certainstandardsthatareverypersonal with

(17)

regardtowhatI likeordislike. Specifically,Iwassearching fora methodof repetition

thatwould produceimageryemployingboldcolor,strongcontrast,andsimplificationof

form. Ibelievethiswas aneffortonmyparttoform imagesof a graphicnaturethat

wouldina sense catchtheviewer's eyethroughswirlingdesigns, symmetryand vivid

color. I wasseekingtoproduce workthatwasnot subtleandcouldalso draw itsvisual

powerfrommass numbers. Bycreatingvibrant, attention-grabbingpaintingsinlarge

quantities ratherthan small,Ibelievedtheimpactcouldbe strengthened visually.

Asthe series progressedI begantoformulateimagesthatwerefigure-like in

appearance, but stilllargelyabstracted. These individualforms,oneper sheetofpaper,

werebornout ofthe movementsI'dmade whileIwasdribblingthepaintfromthe

containers. I foundenjoymentin creating swirls andloopswiththe paint, andlikenedthe

movementstogestural sweepsthatone might executeduringmoretraditionaldrawing.

I'dagain returnedtothefigureasa source ofinspiration,butthistimeIwasmore aware

ofmy subject matter. Traditionalfiguredrawinghadatthis pointbecomearegular

occurrence forme andthisundoubtedly influencedthese fold-overpaintings. Thefirst

set ofimagestookon a gorilla-like appearance andIreferredto theseasthe"Gorilla

Gods"

[Fig. 4]. Thoughthesepaintingsdidnotlookfullyhumanand possessed qualities

of a somewhat

"animal"

nature,theycould stillbe clearlyreadasfigurativein

appearance.

The Gorilla Godpaintings werebasedon averysymmetrical method of creation.

The design foreachpaintingwasformedbyitsbeingreproduced almostidenticallyon

each side ofthe sheetthrough the foldingof onehalfontotheotherhalf. I'd become

attractedto symmetrybecause itwasineffect abyproduct oftheprocess. I was once

(18)

againdealingwiththeelement of chance andtheexcitement relatedtoafeelingofthe

unknown. Inorderforanimagetobecreated,Ihadtospeculate astohowthedribbled

paint would react onceitwasfolded fromoneside ofthepapertotheother. Thenature

ofthepaint(its verythick,fluidquality) wassuchthatthedribbled design Icreatedon

theonehalfwould change as aresultofpressure exertedfromthefoldingaction. This

time, thesignificantlackof control was an even stronger componentoftheprocessthan

myprevious series. Ifrequentlyexperiencedsurpriseand amazementattheresults ofthe

foldedsheetsofpaper. In manycases, thefinisheddesignwouldbecompletelydifferent

fromwhatI'dexpected andthissense of wondermentfueled myenthusiasmforthe

process.

FollowingtheGorilla Godpieces, whichconstitutedthe largestset offold-over

paintings, Icontinuedwiththefold-overtechnique,butmovedontoexplore new

imagery. I chosethis time todealwiththehumanbodymoredirectly bycreating six

fold-overpaintingsofhands ina straight-on view. Thehandsexhibitedan appearanceof

reachingupwardtowardafacethatI'dcollagedintotheopen spacebetweenthem [Fig.

5]. Thisbreak-up ofthespacesettheseHand+Headpaintings apartbecausethestrong

quality ofsymmetry, whichcharacterizedthe GorillaGods,was nowdiminishedbythe

introductionof aforeignelementintotheopenarea Theadditionoftheface-imagewas

aneffortonmyparttofill upa significantamount ofempty spaceinthepicture plane

andportraya more accuraterenderingofhumancharacteristics. Thesewere notfully

formedhumanfigures,butrather, componentsrelatedto thehumanbody

-namelythe

headwithfacialfeatures,andtwohands. Iwasattemptingtorepresentthehuman form

(19)

morerealistically,but Iwantedtoapproachthismannerofdepiction gradually because I

wasstillintheprocess ofreturningtofigurativerepresentation.

[image:19.547.145.409.146.365.2]

4. Tony-Heads

Fig. 6.TonyHeads,2005.

The final seriesIfocusedonwasthe seriesthatrelied moreontraditionalartistic

methodsof creationthanany other. Drawingisanabilitythathasalways comenaturally

tomeandisanactivity inwhichI amconstantly involved. Itwasthrough theact of a

certainkind ofdrawing, namelystream-of-consciousnessdrawing,thatIhadproduced

theimageofthe facethatwaseventually collagedintotheHand+Headpaintings and

becamethefocus ofmylastseries. Thisgenericfacewas not newto me, butrather

somethingthatadornedmynotebooks,padsofpaper, folders, etc.,foryears. I'dcreated

thiscartoon-like image spontaneouslythroughsketchingaswaytodealwith

uninteresting, monotonousor protracted momentsin mylife. Ilookthis typeof

sketchingas acopingmechanismthatiscalmingtome. I supposethedrawn head itself

cameaboutbecauseofmylifelonginterest inthedepictionofthehuman figure.

(20)

When I startedtousetheface in myartwork, I changeditslightly so asto

resemblemyownhead. Atfirst,trueself-portraiture was notmyaimbecause Iwas

seekingtoavoid moretraditionalapproachesto thecreationofart. Yet,withmy firsttwo

seriesI wasdelvingbackintomyinterest inthehuman figurethroughabstraction. Inthe

third series, I'dmade a consciousdecisionto showfurther identifiable humanattributes

inmypaintings. I believethischoice carried overintoadeliberateobjectivetoportray

an even more recognizable representation ofthehuman form. Forme,nothingwasmore

recognizablethanmyownhead. Ialsowantedtouse asubjectthatwasfamiliartome so

that Icould moreeasilyreplicateit fora series.

Thefacewas averysimpledesign,justadrawingusually doneon whichever

piece of paperwasreadilyavailabletome. Ienjoyedthesimplicityoftheformand

noticedthatIcouldreproduceitwith ease. SinceitwassomethingthatIwasfamiliar

with, IdidnothavetospendalotoftimepracticingthewayinwhichIwantedtheimage

tolook. Thechallenge wasinincreasingthe scale, whichis somethingthatIdecidedto

do earlyonbecauseupto that point, theface had been justatinysketch. Sincethe sketch

wassomethingthatI'dreplicated countlesstimeson a minisculelevel (Iwouldusually

do manyofthemat atime),myinterest inthesmallnessofit hadceased. Myintentwas

tomaketheface a more prominent andvisibleimage.

Startingout,I used alargehouse-paintingbrushwithblack, andoccasionally,

dark blueacrylicpainton sheets of paperthatwere22"x30". As I'ddonein thepast, I

experimentedwithmymaterialsuntilI becamesettledinto a seriesofactionsforthe

productionof eachindividual image. IncreasingthescalemeantthatIwouldhaveto

producetheheadina mannerverydifferentfrom thediminutive facesIwas usedto

(21)

making. Now,Iwasspendingmoretimeproducingtheindividual featuresand as a

result, theface hadbecomemuchmore complex. Theprocesstoproducejustonehead

wasfarmoreinvolvingatthisscaleIneededtoemploy a seriesofbrushstrokesthat

would work withrepetition.

After spendingsometimeandlettingtheseries develop, I decidedto take the

projectinadifferent directionbymakingsome simple offsetmonoprintsfromthewet

acrylic pieces [Fig. 6]. Makingprints seemedlikealogicalstepto takebecausewiththis

approach,Icould replicatetheheadalmostimmediately. Once I'dpressed ablanksheet

of paper ontothewetacrylic drawing,Iwouldhave aninstantaneouscopyoftheoriginal.

Afterdoingjustafewofthese monoprints,Inoticedthattheypossessedcertain

visual qualities separatefromtheoriginaldrawings. Therewastheclearindicationofthe

brushstrokesevidentintheprints and a particular roughness offormthatwas causedby

the contactbetweenthetwosheetsofpaper. Additionally,theoriginaldrawings

themselveshad beenalteredslightlyfromthepressingofthepaper. Asa resultofthis

contact, thelineswereflattenedmakingthemfatterandthicker. Since myownheadwas

thecatalystforthis seriesofpaintings, theirforms,despitebeingabstractedand

simplified,retainedforthemostpart,mytrueanatomical proportions. Withthe

monoprintingprocess,myfaceandhead had become distortedto thepointofbeing

almostunrecognizable. Theheadwas muchheavierandbulkier. Itwas asifanewhead

wasformedwithonlyafewofmyfeatures remaining. Seeingmyownheadalteredin

thatmannerwassomething I'dnotexpected,andas aresultitwas abitstartling.

After producingafairamountofdrawingsandmonoprints,Iincreasedthescale

ofthese"Tony-Heads"inanefforttofurtherchallenge myself andbreakawayfromthe

(22)

monotonyoftheprocess. Iacquiredsomephoto-backdroppaperwhichcameinvery

largerolls,roughly9'

x40', andcutitdowninto fourseparate rolls eachmeasuringabout

53"

x 16'. Aftertackingtherollstoawall, Iproceededtouseblack latexpaint withlarge

house paintingbrushestodraw large headsone after anotherasquicklyasI could. I

foundthat thebest waytoexecutethisrepetitive action wastostart atthetopofthehead

andworkmy waydown, filling inthefeaturesofthefaceas Iwent along. Thismethod

ofdrawingwasquitecontraryto the techniquesI'dtraditionallyused. Indrawing,I'd

become accustomedtofirstrenderingtheoverall shape ofthesubject andthenfilling in

thedetailsafterward. Butthesefundamental elements ofdrawingwereirrelevanttothis

particular processbecause Iwas notseekingtomake an accuraterenderingofmy face.

TheTony-Headsacted asakindoficonorsymbolfromwhichIwas derivingacertain

utilitarian use

-namelyasourceforrepetitious action. Insteadof eachheadfunctioning

as a conventional self-portrait withfinelydetailedfacial attributes,Iwasusingtheimage

as akindofmass producedcharacterthatwasextremely graphicinnature:aflattened,

simplifiedform,which seemedtofloatonthewhitesurface ofthepaper.

However,making my head intoa symbol oriconwasawayformetoplace

myselfdirectlyintothework and adda personalcomponenttoit. Atfirst,Ideniedthe

factthatthesereallywere self-portraits. NomatterhowmuchI attemptedtolookatthese

paintings as separatefrommyself-icons or symbolswithout personal

meaningor

attachment

-there wastheundeniablefactthattheylooked verymuchlikeme. Ithink

therewasstill anelement oftheimpersonal increatingsomanyofthem,theideathat

individualidentitycanbelost amongmassnumbers, but portrayingmyselfinthismanner

(23)

could not stiflethefact thatthesewerevery largerepresentations ofmyownphysical

form,no matterhowabstractI'dmadethem.

I believethatwiththisparticularseries,Ifeltthestrongestconnectionboth

physicallyandpsychologically to theactual process. Thiswasdueto thefactthatIwas

usingtechniqueswithwhichIwas experienced. Consequently, I didn'tneedtogo

through theprogressionoffamiliarizingmyself withmybrushesand paintor spendtime

learninghowthematerials wouldbehave. Thepreviousthreeserieshadrelied on

techniques thatwere unfamiliartome andwerenot"standard"methodsforcreating art.

Theywere alsobasedon more complicatedprocedures,which required moreattention

and practiceforexecution. Therefore,Ineededtospendtime learninghowtheprocesses

wouldoperate andtakemore careinimplementingsaidtechniques.

(24)

Influences. Inspirations and Comparisons

When Ibegantheworkthatwouldconstitutemythesis,Idrew inspirationfroma

number ofinfluences,whichacted aspre-existingconstantsthatI was always

subconsciouslyawareof.

TheinfluenceofAsianart was a point of referencethatI couldclearly looktoor

atleast beconscious of as aninspiration forcertain projects. My interestin Asianartand

philosophy goesbacka number of years andduringthis timeI'vecometoidentifymore

stronglywithEasternmethodsofdepictionthanWestern. Myowneducationissteeped

inaWesternperspectivetorenderrealisticallywhendepictingasubject,be ita

landscape,figure,object, etc. Fromanearlyage,Iwas adept atthis method, especially

whenitcametodrawing. However,as I studiedAsianart andbecameaware ofthe

philosophybehindit,Irealizedthatrealistic representationdoesnothavetobethemain

objective of art. Accordingly,Ibecamemoreinterestedinsimplification offormand

flatnessofcolor astheyare appliedtopaintinganddrawing.

I wasparticularlyattractedto traditionalChinesewatercolorpaintingandink

drawingwhereinthe subjects, whicharetakenfromlife,are simplifieddownto their

basic structure and coloris limitedinitsusage. Chineseartistsdevelopedmethods and

techniquesfortheportrayalofspecific subjectsthatwerebasedon strict rulesof

depiction. Forinstance, intraditionalChinese paintingtheportrayal ofabirdorflower is

basedon a series ofmeticulously developed brushstrokesand movementsofthehandand

wrist. The resultingdrawingorpaintingisusuallycomprisedof aflattened imageor

imagesthatdoesnot place emphasis on suchWestern-basedconcepts asvolume, weight,

lightand shadow. Chineseartistsbelievedthatbyportrayinga subjectinthismanner

(25)

theycould capturetheinneressenceofit [Fig. 7]. Tothese artists,itwas moreimportant

tofocusonthesubject'sspiritualexistence andtrytoprojectthisconceptvisuallyrather

thanconcentratingonthesubject'soutward appearance.

m, B *

#Xl^jL

4k*

*

^

"

V

I'

[image:25.547.94.456.132.373.2]

Wr.

&'4

Fig. 7. Wu ChangshuoFlowers,1910.

Myattractionto thiskindof artworkisnotpurelyaesthetic. I enjoytheartwork

for its simplicityandthegraphic quality itexudes,but I alsoaa^nire and aminfluenced

bytheChineseartists'

searchforknowledge andthepursuitofacertainlevel of

perfectionthroughrepetition and practiceoftechnique. I seeacorrelationbetweenthis

method oflearningandmyown searchforakindofperfectionthroughrepeated actions

andtechniques. In myownwork,I very clearly set standardsbasedon aestheticsfor

myselftofollowwithregardtoeachspecific series andpracticedmytechniqueover and

overinordertoattainalevelof perfectioninmymind.

I needto take a momentheretoclarifywhatI meanby "perfect". Theterm

"perfect"

canbeinterpretedinanumber ofdifferentways, but formost people"perfect"

istypicallyassociated withtheideathatsomethingis flawless. I amusingthe termhere

(26)

toexpress whatIfeeltobeapersonalideal andindividualinterpretationofthework and

process. Myintentionwastopush myselftoa point wheretheimagesIproduced could

berefined nofurther. Seeninthis way,perfectionmeant akindof self-satisfactionthat

I'dtrulymadethebestpossibleefforttoproducemyart. Mylevelof perfectionhadto

bebasedonsomething; adegreebywhichIwasjudgingwhether or not a serieswas

working. Thephysical satisfaction orcomfortI experiencedwasnot attainableunlessthe

outcome,meaningtheimagebeingproduced,wastomyliking. As avisualartist,I had

tobasemyjudgmentas towhethersomethingwasworking or not onwhatIwas

producingaesthetically. Inthe end, likeChineseartists, thevisual resultiswhatIwas

strivingforthroughpractice oftechnique. If IfeltthatI couldattainthissatisfaction

physicallywithoutthe visuals,thentherewouldbeno pointin creatingart.

Chineseartwork constitutesmyfirstrealexposureto theart ofAsia,butoverthe

yearsmyinteresthasextendedfurther intootherregions and countriesformallyreferred

toas"Oriental". Withinthelastseveralyears,I'vestudiedJapaneseart, specifically, the

woodblock prints oftheUkiyo-egenre. Theseworks, whichderivemuch oftheirstyle

andphilosophy fromtheart ofChina,arecharacterizedbyflat, simplifiedformsthat

demonstrateahighlydecorativequality.

The Ukiyo-egenreisdividedintotwo timeperiods: theEdo Periodfromthe late

1670'stoabout 1867, andtheMeijiPeriod from 1867 tocirca 1912. Ukiyo,meaning,

"floatingworld",isa referencetotheyoungculturethatflourished inthecities ofEdo

(moderndayTokyo),Kyoto andOsaka. Theseartistscombined restrictedcolorwith

extremely intricatepatterns anddesigns,usuallyincorporatingblackoutlinetoconfine

theirshapes [Figs. 8,9]. Subjectsincludedlandscapes,the theaterand pleasurequarters.

(27)

Often,Ukiyo-e artistswouldportraya personwearingafinelydetailedgarment, withthe

[image:27.547.91.464.107.414.2]

figure itselfrepresentedbyafewdarkoutlines. This simplifyingofthehumanformwas,

Fig. 8.

Kunisada The Hour oftheSnake,1856.

Fig. 9.

Kunisada The Fifty-Three Stations ofthe Tokaido,1852.

likethatusedbytheChinese,somethingtheJapaneseartists stroveforinan effortto

capturetheinnerqualities oftheirsubjects ratherthantheirtrue outward appearance.

Ukiyoisalso ahomonymforthe term"SorrowfulWorld", whichrefersto theearthly

plane ofdeathandrebirthfromwhichBuddhistssought

release.1

Morerecently,I'vebecomeaware ofcontemporaryJapaneseartists including

Takashi Murakami andYoshitomo Nara. Theworkoftheseartistshas its influence in

Japanese comicbookart or

"manga"

as well ascartoons, posters, and signage. In

Murakami's Super FlatManifesto,hestates, "Theworld of thefuturemightbe likeJapan

istoday

-superflat. Society, customs, art,culture: all areextremelytwo-dimensional."2

Isee a connectionbetweenthistypeofphilosophyandmyown work. Forinstance,my

(28)

Hand+HeadFold-Oversas well astheTony-Heads,withtheirstarkblackoutline and

almostcartoonishappearance,are similartoJapanesesigns andpictograms which canbe

foundall over cities such asTokyo.

Murakamitoohasworkedwith repetitionin hisownwork,usingtheimageshe

creates as statements onthenotion oftheindividuallivingamongthemasses. Printssuch

asFlower (Superflat) (2003) [Fig.10]andKiller Pink(2005) [Fig. 11] employ identical

images,butinseparate ways. Flower(Superflat) utilizes abundantflower/humanface

imagerycrammedtogetherforthe purpose offillingtheentireareaofthepictureplane.

Whilethesame asFlower (Superflat),theimageryofKiller Pinkis lessplentiful. Inthis

work,Murakamiincreasesthesizeoftheflower/faceforms, showingthemin close-up

andspreadingthem out, leavingmoreroomfornegative space. Theimageryofboth

worksiscomposedofthesameflower/facesymbolrepeatedmanytimes, withtheonly

[image:28.547.82.264.407.589.2]

differenceamongthembeingcolor and size.

Fig. 10.T.Murakami Flower(Superflat),2003 Fig. 11. T. Murakami KillerPink,2005.

[image:28.547.281.459.408.587.2]
(29)

Murakamicontinuesthis theme of repetitioninthetwo prints, Louis Vuitton Eye

LoveSuperflat, Black(2003) [Fig. 12] and Louis Vuitton Eye LoveSuperflat, White [Fig.

13]. Thesetwo works, whichdepictsimple designsandsymbols, arevirtually identical

exceptforthedifferingcolorarrangements: ablack backgroundfortheformerand a

whitebackgroundforthelatter.

+

+

+

+

+

+

A. 4.

^

x <+,

:

?

k

[image:29.547.65.473.190.430.2]

, <mm>

:

<$?

it

^

+" +

?

Fig. 12. Takashi Murakami5/acA,2003. Fig.13. Takashi Murakami White,2003.

Murakami'sworkoften carrieswithit thethemeofmassproductionaswayof

commenting onhisown society's obsessionwithconsumerism andtheJapanese' loveof

allthingsmaterial. Throughhisart,Murakamicreatessculptures, paintings,drawings,

toys,blow-updolls,books and videosthatfocusonbright, eye-catchingimagery,which

are reminiscent oftheseemingly infinitenumberof materialproducts availableto the

Japanesepeople. Alloftheseartworks arecommerciallyreproducedforMurakami who

marketsthem tothepublic.

Though Asianarthas hada profound impactonmyrecentwork,Iamstillvery

interested inmuchthatEuropeandAmerica havetooffer. Oneartist whohashada

significantinfluenceonmyrecent workistheAmerican Jonathan Borofsky. His

26

IL V Jk

1"

^r

+

*L

-y

?

15

?

4"

?

K

<>

X

<

-4*

+y <i* *

sr

<+-)

*5*

O

c

J- A

?

>

X

?

X

X

A & A. <

f

1

[image:29.547.63.291.194.411.2]
(30)

conceptual methodsofcreatingwereparticularlyinfluentialbeginningwithmy

Handprintseries.

Borofsky(b. 1942) isregarded as one ofthepioneers ofinstallationart,and more

precisely artthatis labeled "site specific". Heisalsoknown forworkthatis purely

conceptualinnature.Borofsky's conceptual modeofcreatingisparticularlyevidentin

oneofhisearlier workstitledCountingFrom 1 To 3227146 [Fig. 14]. Basedalmost

solelyonthenotion ofrepetition, Borofsky's34-inch highstackof plain8

V2"

x 11"

graph papercontained numbersgoingfrom1 intothemillionswrittenonthepages.

Borofsky gaveupartin favorofcounting fulltime. The artistsaidthathewasinterested

inthe consecutive natureofcountingandthefact thatnumbersare suchan

Fig.14. JonathanBorofsky CountingFrom 1 To 3227146.

[image:30.547.171.384.325.630.2]
(31)

part ofeveryday life. Hestates,"Numbers arelikeGod. Theyconnect usalltogetherin

away nothingelsedoes. Like

magic."3

Borofskycontinuedwiththeprojectforseveral

years,butexpanded uponitbysketchinganddoodlingonthepagesashewas counting.

Eventually,thosesketchesbecamethe artist's mainfocus,buthedidnotstop counting

altogether. Countingas a projectmayhavecometoanend,butBorofskycontinuedto

countbyusingnumbers as awayto signhisdrawings. He simplycarried onfromthe

lastnumber he hadwritten onthegraph paperandusedthesubsequent numbersashis

signature on most ofhis laterartwork.

Anothercharacteristic ofBorofsky'sworkisthatitcannotbelabeledasbelonging

toanyparticular style. Hisworkis essentiallymulti-facetedintermsofthemediahe

uses andtheprojectsheundertakes. Notonetorestricthimselftoonlyoneformof

art-making, Borofskyhasbeen knowntoworkindrawing,painting, sculpture, printmaking,

video, film,soundproductionand ahostofothermedia. I feela connectiontothis

mannerofcreatingartbecausealthoughI primarilywork withtwo-dimensional media,I

donotwishtolimitmyselftoone ortwospecificstyles. EachprojectIworked onfor

mythesiswasverydifferent fromtheonethatcamebeforein bothprocess andimagery

created.

Borofsky'

s abilitytocarryoutprojects likeCountingisrepresentative ofthe

artist'sextraordinarysense ofdisciplineasit isappliedtohisart andlife. To countday

inanddayoutwithoutfail forseveral yearsdemonstratesadrivethatcanbe describedas

obsessiveinnature. To me,disciplineisvery importantand remains anecessity, which

extendsintomuch ofmy dailylife. Iamthe typeofperson who needs a certain amount

ofstructureinmylife, soitwouldonlymakesenseforthistofilter intomymethodsfor

(32)

creatingart. Like manypeople,I gothroughcertaindailyrituals. One very important

dailyritualIhaveisexercise. For manyyears nowI havedevotedacertain amountof

time everydaytoworkingout. Thisdailyritualhasgottentothepoint ofbeing

automatic,somethingI don'tthinkabout orquestion,Ijust do it. Myhabit forexercise

grew out of a needtokeepmybodyinshapefollowing severalmajorinjuries. Iam

drivenbytheneedtobe functionalinlifeand ratherthanrelyingdrugs,theexercise

servesto keepmephysically sound and abletodothethingsIwanttodo,including

makingart. Asaresult,if Idonot exercise and maintainthatlevelofdisciplineand

functionality,Ifeelasif I'mlosingcontrol.

Likeexercise, art, especiallydrawing,requires a certain amount of practice or

timespentdoingthephysicalactinorderfortheartisttoremainadept atit. Formyself,

ifIrefrainfromdrawingforanextendedperiod,Ibecome"rusty"whenIreturntoitand not abletoproduce attheartisticlevels I have formyself. If Iceasedrawingforawhile,

I'malways abletoreturntomy formerdesirablelevel,butnotwithoutmuch practice.

Hypothetically,if I'dtakenanextendedleavefroma series andthen tried toreturnit

immediately,Iwouldhavebeenunsuccessful. Iwouldhave hadto take time towork

back upto thatparticularlevel ofart making.

These levelsrefertofeelingsIhave in mymind astowhatIthinkmyart should

look like. Again,it ismatterofpersonaltasteastowhether ornot adrawingorpainting

I've creatediswhatIconsidertobe"good."

Sometimestheselevelsare not permanent

inthemindofthe artist and change overtime. Frequently, I will createsomethingthatI

thinkis first-rate and experience aparticularamount of excitementand sense of

accomplishment. Then Iwill putitawayand notlookatitagainfora certain amount of

(33)

time,returntoit, andconsideritsub par. Allofmyseriesemployed abstraction ofthe

figure insomewayor anotherandIhaddifferentstandardsforeachthatwerebased on

how I feltatthe timeoftheircreation.

Ina number ofways,creatingarthas been formecomparabletoakindof

physicalact, likeexercise. When Iwasworkingon a projectthatwouldemploya

particular refinedtechnique,I could notjustcomeinfresheveryday andproduce right

away. Eachdaily session of workinvolved a certain amount of"warmup"

timewherein

Iwouldhavetodo afewpractice piecesbeforeI gotinto agrooveorrhythm. I would

see eachdrawingorpaintingthatI made as a repetition or

"rep"

asit isreferredtoin

exerciseterms. Withcertain projectsIfeltas thoughIwasinconstantmotion, going

through the steps neededtocreate eachindividualpiece of work. Ibelievethediscipline

that was involvedin creatingthe serieshelpedmetobegintheprojects and sustainmy

interestthroughouttheirduration. Eachproject represents akindoftemporaryobsession

forme whereinIwas so engrossed intheprocessthatIhadtokeepgoinguntilmy

interest wavered. AttimeswhileI wascreatingtheTony-Heads,IfeltasthoughI were

workinginanAbstract Expressionist manner,something I'dhadyears of experience

with.

Approachingartina physical waywassomething I veryclearlyintendedandI

think thishadadirectinfluenceonmy decisiontousefigurative imagery. Like Willem

DeKooning, averyphysicalpainter,Iwantedtoemploy gestural sweepsofthebrushto

displaythepresence ofmyhandmakingthe marks,butalsoconveyahumanelementto

theimagery. De Kooning's Womanseries ofthe 1950's [Fig. 15]depicts human females

(34)
[image:34.547.168.393.50.345.2]

Fig. 15. Willem deKooningWoman1,1950-52.

buried beneaththeartist'sexceedinglyheavy,physicalbrushworkandthickly applied

paint. Asviewers,wecanlookathispaintings andactuallytrace themarkshemade.

Though De Kooning'sworkhas beencharacterized asmaking arathermisogynist

comment onthecultural stateof womenduringthemid-TwentiethCentury,healso

desiredtoshowhisownphysical beingwithinhisart. Hecreated paintingsthatportray

thehuman formthroughimageryand atthesametime,puthimselfintotheworkby

makingthepresence ofhisownhandevident.

(35)

Conclusion

EachprojectIworked onfor mythesiswasan essential componentinthe

construction ofthelargerbodyof work. Eachseries represented a certain amount of

learningthatIconsidervitaltomydevelopmentasanartist. EventheseriesthatI

deemed lesssuccessful wereimportantlearningexperiencesthataided meinbetter

understandingthekindof artIhavechosentopursue. If Ithought thata particular

techniqueI wastryingout was notworking,I would abandonitand move onto thenext

onewiththeknowledgeIhadgained. I'vediscoveredthatworking inthismanner

requires a certain amount oftimespentinordertorealize ifa projectis goingtosucceed.

Trialand error remains one ofthe cornerstones ofmyprocess andIsometimesdonot

realizethata seriesisn'tworkinguntilI'veproduced alargenumber ofdrawingsand

paintings.

TheaspectIammost critical of wasmythesisexhibition. Theinstallationofthe

showwasin itselfan education andIlearneda greatdealaboutthe typeof artistI had

becomeas result oftheworkIproduced. Workingrepetitively,andforthatmanner

conceptually,wassomethingthatwasentirelynewtome. Consequently,whenitcame

time toinstallthe show,Iwas abit lost. I hadalotof choicestodealwithregardingthe

mannerinwhichthework should or couldbe displayed. Displayhadbeenanissue for

methroughout thethesis,but itwas somethingthatI really only hadtoaddressduring

critiques. WiththeshowI nowhadtomake some concretedecisionsabout problemsthat

previously had only been inthebackofmymind. Thiswasthemosttroubling and

confusingquestion: HowdoI displaythiswork?

(36)

Theproblem stemmedfromthefactthatIhadavery largeamount ofdrawings

andpaintingstochoosefrom anddecidehowtodisplay. Thisbringsupanimportant

issuethatI'd beendealingwith sincetheHandprintseries. When working inmultiples, I

was confrontedwiththequestionof whetherthepiecesthatmadeupa series couldbe

displayedontheirown asindividualworksordidtheyneedtobe displayedtogetheras a

group? Myconclusion wasthatit reallydependsontheseries.

The Handprintproject was such a vast and varied seriesthat insomecases,

finishedprints couldin factworkasindividualpieces. Still,therewere somethatweren't

as successful as others. Thiswas not a problembecausetheso-calledbadprints would

merge withinthelargergroupas a whole. Amongstthe 300+printsthatI'dcreated,

groups within groupshadbeenformedwhichcouldverywellhavebeen displayed

separately. However,Ibelievethat displayingall ofthemtogethergavetheseriesits

visceral impact. The Fold-Overseriesessentiallyfunctionedthesamewayasthe

Handprints inthat some ofthepaintings workedontheirownand somedidnot.

The groupaesthetic also appliedtotheDrip-Paintings,butastheprojectevolved,

itbecamemore complex andthepaintingsbecamemoreindividualized. This

individualizationappliedmainlyto thelaterpaintingsintheseriesthatwere spreadout

over several sheets of paper. Withthese paintings,it becamemoredifficulttoinclude

them withthesmaller piecessimplybecauseoftheamount of spacetheyrequiredfor

display.

Theprojectthatrelied most ongroupdisplaywastheTony-Headseries,primarily

thelarger drawings. Thesequence of actions withthebrushyieldeddrawingsthatwere

very similarvisually. Seeingonehead displayedonitsown wouldprobablynotelicit

(37)

much of a reactionfrom aviewer. ButI wasconcentratingonquantity, scale and sheer

numberswiththisprojectinparticular. Accordingly,thegroupdynamicworkedbest.

Thesefactorsaffectedmyplanningofthethesis show, butessentially,Iwas not

interestedindisplayinganyofthedrawingsorpaintings individually. Ihadcreatedthese

pieces as groups and wantedthem tostayinthatformatfortheexhibition.

Forthe showIhadsecuredtheglassdisplay cases onthe thirdfloordirectly

abovetheBevierGalleryatRIT. Imadethedecisiontouse this spacebecause ofthe

amount of workthatI wishedtoinclude. Itwassimplynot possibleformetoshowall of

myworkinthegallerybecausetherewere eleven other graduate studentsinthe

exhibition andIneeded quite abitofwall space. I was requiredtouse some ofthespace

intheBevierGallery andthisconsisted oftwoportable walls pushedtogetherand a

couple oflectern-shapedpedestals. Iused one sideofthedoublewallstoinstallthe

Handprintproject andtheothersidetoexhibit somedrawings I hadmade. The

lectern-pedestalswereusedto holdsix sketchbooksthatIincluded becauseIthought the

drawingscontained withinthemcouldhelptoillustratetherepetitivethemeI'dbeen

concentratingon. IwassatisfiedwiththeHandprintdisplay, but Ithought theother side

ofthewallwas unsuccessful. Itseemedratherbarrenwith onlythreedrawingsonitand

thelecternsmadethesketchbooks seem out ofplace.

The onlyconcretedecision Imadebeforeinstallingtheworkonthe thirdfloor

wasthatIwantedtohavethelargeTony-Heads, doneon 16'pieces ofphoto-backdrop

paper, linethe two shorter glasscases,runningthelengthof each wall. Thesetwocases

were of equal length,roughly 45'. Mypurpose wastohavetheHeadsvisible fromthe

gallerybelow. However,I didnotwanttheTony-Headstobefullyvisiblefromthe

(38)

gallery,butratherslightlyobscuredbytheledge formedbytheopen-ceiling gapofthe

gallery. Essentially,my intentwastohavetheHeadsappeartobe peekingovertheledge

ifone wereto standineitherthefrontorbackofthegallery. Assuch,I hadtohangthem

attheproperheight. Iftheyweretoohighortoolow, thepeekingeffect wouldn'twork.

Aftersometrialanderror,Iwas abletoachievethisand wasverypleasedwiththeway it

turnedout.

Mymain concernwas withthemiddle glass case onthe thirdfloorwhere mostof

thework wasondisplay. Thiswasthe longestofthe three walls, about56', andprovided

thelargestspacefor display. Iwasverytornabout what artworktoinclude inthis space

andhow itshouldbeexhibited. I knewthatIwantedtoincludecertainthings,butwas

unsure about other works. Inthe end,Iresolvedtocarryouttheentireinstallationwith

no setplaninmind. Thisprovedtobe very difficult.

I hadseparated outeachseriesonthewall. Whilesome oftheprojects worked

wellinthedisplay, othersdidnot. Iwas satisfiedwiththedisplayoftheFold-Over

paintings and anotherpiece, theBillsProject. ButafterIwasfinished,Irealizedthat

therewas alotofunusedwall spacethatdiminishedtheexhibitas a whole. Inaddition,

theoveralllackof cohesivenessamongthe series astheyrelatedtoeach otherwas,I

think, confusingtoviewers.

Mostofthepieceshad beenhungrelatively quicklywithpush-pins. Myreason

forthismannerofhangingwasthatsincethepieces wereproducedquickly,Ithought

theyshouldbehunginawaythatwoulddemonstratethisaspect. Mygoal wastocreate

aninformalatmosphere withinthe installationthatwouldreflecttheprocessesI had

employedtoproducethework. Ultimately,Ifailedtoachievethisobjective andan

(39)

overall sense offormalitywasestablishedwiththeinstallationthatIfeltwasout ofplace

forthistypeof work. Itwasaveryneat andorderlyexhibitandIbelievethatwasthe

problem.

Myartworkessentiallyprojectsafeelingoftheunconventional. Itisultimately

conceptualinnatureand as such, itshouldbeexhibitedina mannerthatemphasizesthis

notion. I donotthink thiswas achievedwithmythesis show. However,I realizenow

thatIneededtogothrough thisexperience inordertounderstandthatthereisaproper or

atleastbetter way fortheworktobeexhibited. Althoughtheshowwasadisappointment

tomeoverall,itwasaverypositive learningexperienceforthefuture. Thus, Inowfeel

more confident andabletodealwithexhibiting thisartworkin itsfinished form.

Inow recognizethat this typeof artworkrequires a spacethatisopentonew

conceptsinartratherthanatraditionalgallery setting. Lookingbackonthe thesis show,

thechangesI wouldhavemadeinvolvemakingabetterefforttoillustratethecontrolled

chaosthatIexperiencewhenIproduce repetitively. Ifrepetitionisthemainideaofthis

work, thenit issomethingthat shouldbeemphasized.

InthefutureIwouldliketoexperiment withthedisplayoftheworkinvarious

ways. Oneofthe ideas I have isto takeworkfromseveral oftheseries and combineit in

averyunorganized, almosthaphazardstyle. I envisionobtainingalargewallspace and

crammingitwithdrawingsandpaintings untilthewallitselfdisappears behindthe

artwork. Iwouldalso tiketomovebeyondasimple wall-type ofdisplay,utilizing floor

space,tables, desks,shelves, etc.,inan efforttodisplayworkson paperinastacked

manner.

(40)

Final Thoughts

Asa result ofmyexhibitionandthefactthatitwas supposedtorepresentthe

culminationofmy thesis,Irealizedthatmyoriginalintention forthethesiswasunclear

tomyselfas well astoothers. I knewthatthe thesiswas supposedtoserve as an

investigationof anideaandIhad a ratherdifficulttime, atleast inthebeginning,of

clearlyidentifyingthatidea. Withregardto the threeaspects ofprocess, series and

repetition, Iwasn'tnecessarilytryingtoexplore whether onewas moreimportantthan

theothers. Yet,whenIbegan my secondyear, IthoughtIwas mostinterested inthe

processofmakingart. Inthis paper,I've goneinto detail abouttheactual processesI

underwentto createthe artwork, butasImoved closerto theconclusion ofmythesis

work, itseemedthatrepetition wasreallythemostimportant thingtome. Lookingback,

itwastheactofrepeatingtoachieve a meditative sense of rhythm and alevelof

perfectionintechnique thatbroughtmethemostjoyand satisfaction asan artist.

OneoftheconceptsIstruggled withindisplayingthework was whethertoshow

orillustratetheprocessfromstarttofinish. Thisapproach meantthatIwouldhave

shown allofthedrawingsor paintingsfroma givenseries regardless of whetherIthought

theyweregoodorbad. Bydisplayingthework onawall, theviewerwouldprobablynot

havemuchdifficulty decipheringtheoverall conceptbeingpresented. However,during

thecourse ofthethesisI cametorealizethatalthough processwassomething I was

indeedvery interestedin,itwasnottheidea I ultimatelywishedtoconveytoviewers.

Consequently,I focusedprimarilyonshowingthedrawingsand paintingsthatIfeltbest

representedaparticular series. Thisisa conceptdirectlyrelatedtoaesthetics andthe

feelingthatasanartist,I amstillveryconcernedwithcreating visually pleasingartwork.

(41)

Inconclusion,I believethethesishastaughtmethat process, andinparticular

repetition,remain aprimarymeans oflocatingmeaning, functionandformwithin visual

artwork.

(42)

Endnotes

Wikipedia contributors,"Ukiyo-e,"

Wikipedia, The FreeEncyclopedia,

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/inde\.php?title=Ukiyo-e&oldid=5978347S.

TakashiMurakami, SuperFlat (Tokyo: Madra Publishing Co. Ltd.,2000), p.4.

3

AnnCurran, "Jonathan Borofsky NobodyKnows HisName, EverybodyHas HisNumber,"

CarnegieMellonMagazine, Spring2002, www.cmu.edu/magazine/02spring/borofsky.html.

(43)

List ofIllustrations

Fig. 1:Anthony Trinchera,MeatHooks, 2003,mixedmedia, threehundred 4x6 in.

indexcards.

Fig. 2: Trinchera,detailofFig. 1.

Fig. 3:Trinchera, Untitled(DripPaintings),2004,acryliconpaper, varyingsizes.

Fig. 4: Trinchera,Gorilla Gods, 2004,latexandblackgessoonpaper,sixteen 19x25 in.

sheets.

Fig. 5: Trinchera,Hand+Heads, 2004,acrylic andlatexonpaper,four 19x25 Vi in.

sheets.

Fig. 6: Trinchera,TonyHeads, 2005,latexonpaper, two22 x30 in. sheets.

Fig. 7: WuChangshuoFlowers, 1910,watercolor andinkonpaper,artcyclopedia.com, www.artcyclopedia.com/nationalities/chinese.html (accessed June 15, 2006).

Fig. 8: Kunisada, The Hour oftheSnake, 1856, woodblockprint, Hans OlofJoha

Figure

Fig. 2. Mea< HooAs (detail).
Fig. 3. Untitled (Drip Paintings), 2004.
Fig. 4. Gorilla Gods, 2004.
Fig. 6. Tony Heads, 2005.
+7

References

Related documents

The protoplast test may be omitted and the analysis, whether the sequence is edited or not, can be performed using cloning and sequencing without a PCR/restriction enzyme

Therefore, an application that uses MID will have the advantage of getting input from multiple mice when running on MID-ready systems, and will still work with one mouse when running

The V90 server virtualization host using Microsoft Hyper-V hypervisor is the only server configuration supported by Invensys for hosting I/A Series and Foxboro Control

However, while remote estimates of vine vigor such as plant cell density (PCD) or NDVI have provided consistent estimates of berry yield and composition in irrigated vineyards

If you elect to choose a different cost basis election for each fund held under the account number, please complete our Cost Basis Election Form, which is available on our

At the conclusion of this webinar, you will be able to: • List 5 steps to improving your website profitability.. • List 8 items that need to be covered on your

If the purpose of the coaching is to achieve desired outcomes then the role of the coach is to work with the coachee to find out what is limiting, restricting and blocking

includes both variable and fixed costs).. What is the transfer price for butyl?.. Product Costing and Transfer Prices –. … Fixed costs were allocated to production based on a