• No results found

INNOVATION STILL MATTERS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "INNOVATION STILL MATTERS"

Copied!
16
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Insights from the

2015 Ketchum

Innovation Kernel Study

INNOVATION

STILL

MATTERS

(2)

The ThreaT of InnovaTIon faTIgue

O1

Innovation is everywhere. From those making

appliances to automobiles, laptops to lab equipment, companies promise consumers a superior experience based on a brand’s innovation claims. More than 250 books on innovation were published in Q4 2014 alone. Yet with the rise of the internet and technology moving at infinitely faster rates, the term “innovation” risks becoming as obsolete as some of the technology itself. For marketers, the threat of “innovation fatigue” is very real; the term is so en vogue that it risks losing its value as a motivating brand attribute. Yet this risk also presents an opportunity. A true understanding of how consumers define, perceive and value innovation affords companies and brands the chance to directly and positively impact brand reputation and purchasing behaviors. At Ketchum, we call this brand mindset the Innovation Kernel.

The 2015 Ketchum Innovation Kernel Study, the first multi-country survey to calibrate the importance of innovation as a brand attribute, provides a clear roadmap to achieve this end. Exploring the mindsets of more than 4,000 consumers across five markets – the U.S., the U.K., Spain, Hong Kong and Mainland China – the Innovation Kernel study examines

consumer perceptions on the importance of innovation across a range of industry sectors, the factors that contribute to people’s opinions of companies and products, and offers guidance on the implication of these insights for marketers and communicators.

“ TRuLy uNdERSTANdINg

hOw CONSuMERS

pERCEIVE INNOVATION

ENAbLES COMpANIES

TO IMpACT REpuTATION

ANd puRChASINg

bEhAVIORS. wE CALL

ThIS MINdSET ThE

INNOVATION KERNEL.

Susan Butenhoff

Partner and Director,

(3)

The good news for companies is that effectively communicating innovation will still net rewards. Innovation fatigue has not taken over. The Innovation Kernel study shows that 68 percent of consumers are willing to pay on average 21 percent more for a brand they consider innovative. Nine in 10 say innovation is important to their brand preference. This “Innovation Valuation” is amplified most in China, with nearly nine in 10

(89 percent) reporting they would pay more for a brand’s innovative product, followed closely by Hong Kong (80 percent). Interestingly, U.S. consumers, who are often thought to be enthusiastic early adopters of new products, were the second-lowest when it came to willingness to paying more for innovation, followed by the U.K.

58%

19%+

25%+

17%+

21%+

21%+

24%+

63%

64%

68%

80%

89%

U.K. U.S. SPAIN AVERA

GE

HONG K

ONG

CHINA

If you consider a brand innovative, are you willing to pay more for it?

O2

68 pERCENT

Of CONSuMERS

ARE wILLINg TO

pAy ON AVERAgE

21 pERCENT

MORE fOR

INNOVATIVE

bRANdS

Q.

The bar chart element of this graph shows the percentage of respondents willing to pay more for innovation. The upper line graph illustrates how much more those consumers are willing to pay for a brand they consider innovative.

ThE INNOVATION VALuATION:

hOw pERCEpTION bOOSTS pRICINg

(4)

The InnovaTIon valuaTIon

O3

TECh EVANgELISTS

Very tech savvy; confident about tech knowledge; first to try new technology; use technology frequently and give technology advice to others; will pay for top-quality electronics

ACTIVE TEChIES

Feel technology is important to their lives; use technology for entertainment and utility purposes; own a range of connected devices and use them daily; likely to be interested in knowing more about connected devices

MOdERATE TEChIES

Use technology daily; feel less knowledgeable about technology specifics than early adopters or heavy users; use smart phone and tablet daily; do not use laptop daily

pASSIVE TEChIES:

Last to buy new technology; feel technology is useful but not an important part of their lives; brand loyal when it comes to tech products because they are not comfortable comparing other options

RESpONdENTS wERE CATEgORIzEd

by ThEIR fAMILIARITy wITh

TEChNOLOgy,

fALLINg INTO ONE

(5)

ThE INduSTRy VIEw:

INNOVATION IN hEALThCARE

IS MOST CRITICAL

O4

While innovation clearly still matters in

the hearts and minds of consumers

,

AVERAgE u.S. u.K. SpAIN hONg KONg ChINA

Very important 54% 60% 47% 74% 29% 45%

Somewhat important 35% 31% 40% 21% 49% 45%

Not very important 9% 7% 10% 5% 21% 9%

Not at all important 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% 1%

THE IMPORTANCE OF

INNOVATION IN HEALTHCARE

the study finds that innovation is not a silver bullet across every industry sector. The extent to which it is valued varies by consumer demographics, including their country of origin.

While the healthcare industry is considered by many in the technology industry as lagging behind when it comes to technology and innovation, it rated highest in terms of industries where innovation is “very important” (54 percent).

(6)

O5

The importance of innovation in healthcare was the only category to intensify as consumers aged, growing 10 points from people 35 to 44 years old (54 percent) to people over 65 (64 percent) – a fitting trend among a global population that is living longer and experiencing more chronic diseases. Healthcare innovation is also more important to women (59 percent) than men (48 percent).

The exceptions to healthcare outranking consumer tech for importance of innovation were in China (45 percent) and Hong Kong (29 percent), where innovation is by far the most important for computers. At play is a clear love of gadgets, like consumer electronics and computers — a segment where product design and functionality advances are more tangible, faster-paced and thus more easily recognized. The continued use of Chinese medicine alongside Western medicine in both of these markets may also lead people to see the healthcare industry as more traditional than innovative. Interestingly, it is the least technology savvy group, dubbed the Passive Techies, who rank healthcare innovation as their top priority, with 44 percent citing it as very important compared to their second ranked choice, computers, at 18 percent. Whether it is due to the new generation of wearable technologies, ingestible sensors or the potential of more personalized therapies through Big Data, healthcare innovation is seen as having strong promise and appeal for consumers across multiple ages and geographies.

The IndusTry vIew:

Innovation in Healthcare Is Most Critical

hEALThCARE

IS ThE ONLy

CATEgORy

whERE

ThE IMpORTANCE

Of INNOVATION

INTENSIfIES AS

CONSuMERS AgEd.

(7)

Computers and consumer electronics – including mobile phones, gaming systems, TVs and audio products – are still categories where innovation matters. The importance of innovation is higher among existing owners who are looking for new improvements at a faster rate. At the product level, innovation is deemed most important in computing and smart phone categories (and to a lesser extent for tablets and TVs), which may be in part explained by the fact that this market is also undergoing a significant softening. Gaming is an interesting category, because only 39 percent of gamers deem innovation as very important. Gamers may be at the point that they no longer want to continue investing in new consoles, as the shelf life of these systems is getting shorter with increasingly higher investment requirements for new hardware and software.

O6

INNOVATION IS STILL KEy

fOR COMpuTERS

ANd CONSuMER ELECTRONICS

Despite healthcare being the number one category where

consumers value innovation, healthcare companies are

not necessarily perceived as being innovative.

how important is it to you that each of the following consumer technology products is labeled as innovative?

Q.

The bar chart shows the percentage of consumers who ranked innovation as “very important” for each type of consumer technology product.

Computer Smart phone Tablet Television Cell phone Household appliance Connected home system Gaming system Music equipment 34% 50% 48% 38% 33% 31% 28% 23% 21%

(8)

In fact, when it comes to the airline industry, nearly one-third say innovation is “not very important” or “not at all important.” And, although connected home devices have received a lot of attention, only 30 percent of those polled indicated innovation in connected home devices as “very important.” Compare that to computers at 49 percent. However, for Tech While consumers have

benefitted from innovation in these categories (such as with Wi-Fi on planes, mobile boarding cards, auto navigation systems and other tech-enabled features that deliver safer, more effective, better quality products), consumers see these as improvements and not innovations.

Evangelists, the importance of innovation for the connected homes category jumped to 50 percent, demonstrating that this category is still an early adopter market. Modern-day conveniences improved through technology innovation are almost taken for granted in non-tech categories, and many may likely attribute the innovations to a tech company behind the scenes instead.

O7

RATINg INNOVATION

bEyONd ThE TEChNOLOgy SECTOR

VS

The value of innovation across such categories as

airlines, consumer packaged goods and automotive

was ranked least important among consumers across

all geographies surveyed.

(9)

hOw CONSuMERS dEfINE

INNOVATION:

IT’S NOT AbOuT

fIRST-TO-MARKET ANyMORE

O8

manufacturing environment, innovation is less about timing than it is about a company’s proven track record in delivering new products that don’t

disappoint. This new consumer definition of innovation is creating new challenges in the technology market with companies having to balance first-mover advantage against risk issues that will tarnish their reputation and proven success track record.

Not only does first-to-market no longer hold the innovation cachet it once did, but the idea of producing a steady cadence of new products throughout the year is no longer important to consumers. Nearly half of respondents expect new products to be launched when there are meaningful advancements (47 percent) and not based on a yearly schedule (27 percent). Only one-third of those surveyed indicated that but while being the first to

bring a technology product to market may have its business advantages, it does not bear as much weight on consumers’ perception of a company’s innovative qualities. Instead, consumers today cite a company’s proven track record of launching successful technology products as the most important factor (47 percent) that influences their opinions. This may be due to the fact that as the technology market has matured with more rapid product commoditization cycles, first-to-market has a much shorter timeline advantage. Also in a more globally competitive

a company’s ability to introduce new products over the course of a year contributes to their opinion of innovation.

Not surprisingly, the more tech-savvy the consumer, the higher the expectations for regular products releases. Game-changing product

innovations boil down to quality of life impact. Based on the responses, it is clear that consumers don’t necessarily expect product innovations to change the ways they do everything, every day. Instead they want innovations that will help improve their quality of life, allowing them to be more efficient and to do something they thought was impossible. Fifty-eight percent cited quality of life improvement as contributing to their

opinion on product innovation, with “making your life more efficient” a close second at 57 percent.

Being first-to-market

used to be a critical

element in

determining the

industry innovators,

(10)

While there are similarities across the general population, there also are significant regional differences by market. Consumers in both the U.S. and China place a significant amount of weight on a company’s legacy success, product design, speed to market and the talents of the company’s leader. Conversely, consumers in Hong Kong place the least value on those qualities.

The value of innovation to Chinese and U.S. consumers may be linked to the rapid adoption of technology and the pervasiveness of technology marketing in those countries. In Hong Kong, consumers are more brand loyal, decreasing the influence of innovation marketing on their perception.

O9

ASIAN MARKETS

VIEw

INNOVATION

dIffERENTLy

AVERAgE u.S. u.K. SpAIN ChINA hONg KONg Proven Track Record Of Launching

Successful Technology Products

47% 58% 45% 42% 61% 31%

Introduce Products That Have A New/ Different Look And Feel

42% 47% 37% 41% 57% 34%

First To Market New Products 42% 45% 35% 42% 59% 32%

The CEO Is Very Visible And Seems Innovative 34% 38% 28% 28% 54% 27%

FACTORS INFLUENCING CONSUMER PERCEPTION

OF COMPANY INNOVATION

(11)

OVERALL, ACROSS MARKETS,

hONg KONg ANd ChINA STANd

OuT

IN ThEIR dIffERINg VIEwS

Of INNOVATION

While healthcare came out at the top for importance of innovation

amongmost markets, innovation is more important in computers for Hong Kong and China

While globally, consumers typically expect companies to innovate

whenever new advancements become available (47 percent), Hong Kong consumers expect new products every year (30 percent) and upgrades every six months (28 percent)

Eighty percent of Hong Kong consumers and 89 percent of China consumers are willing to pay more for brand innovation – which is significantly higher than consumers in the U.S., U.K. or Spain

Trust in and use of professional reviews is notably higher in

Mainland China than in other markets,

with the exception of Spain, in which professional reviews also ranks high

Social platforms are the most frequently consulted channel

in Hong Kong and are used at a

similar rate to professional reviews

In Mainland China, sources of trusted information are divided

nearly evenly among professional reviews, media articles, advice from friends and family, and social platforms

10

(12)

professional reviews and media articles as trusted sources, whereas females tend to rely more on friends and family members.

Marketing and advertising were among the least trusted sources of information for evaluating how innovative a company or product is, indicating a

disconnect between how brands market their products and the channels their target audiences value. And despite the fact that social media has provided consumers with closer brand intimacy, social platforms did not score highly in markets outside of Hong Kong and China. With only 5 percent basing

their innovation perception on corporate advertising Consumers today are exposed

to an extraordinary volume of marketing clutter - upwards of 5,000 ads alone in any given day (Yankelovich). So it’s imperative that companies know their audience and the channels that are most relevant when telling their innovation story. Survey respondents say they are most likely to get trusted innovation information on a company from professional reviews (56 percent), articles in the media (52 percent), and advice from family and friends (48 percent). The exception to this is Hong Kong, where respondents rely most on social platforms (56 percent). Trust in and use of professional reviews is notably higher in Spain, Hong Kong and China. Males lean toward

or marketing, it’s clear that companies can’t buy a reputation for innovation. Rather, consumers will trust and value a brand’s innovation story most when it is credibly communicated through third-party influencers.

This means it’s time for companies to rethink taglines and instead focus on developing business and communications strategies that pay off with innovation attributes that customers care about through channels they trust. Companies will be best positioned to succeed when innovation is core to their DNA and reflected in all the ways they connect with their target audiences, not just used as a marketing strategy. With consumers seeming to take technology innovation for granted in non-tech categories, marketers and communicators outside the tech sector have an opportunity to improve the “innovation valuation” associated with these

non-technology brands. Those who will be most successful in telling their innovation story will know that for consumers, innovation credit must be earned, not bought.

11

INNOVATION ShOuLd

bE EARNEd,

NOT bOughT

wITh ONLy 5 pERCENT VIEwINg

AdVERTISINg OR MARKETINg AS ThE

MOST TRuSTEd SOuRCE,

IT’S CLEAR

ThAT COMpANIES CAN’T buy AN

INNOVATION REpuTATION.

(13)

12

5 RuLES

fOR TOdAy’S

CONSuMER-RIghT INNOVATION

1

dON’T RuSh

TO MARKET.

First-to-market is no longer the bar; consumers prefer a pedigree of proven success

2

INNOVATION

CREdIbILITy

ShOuLd bE EARNEd,

NOT bOughT.

Educate the influencers with the most clout: reviewers and media

4

ThINK bIg.

Consumers would rather wait longer and get meaningful advances than see frequent releases of minor upgrades

5

gO bEyONd

EARLy

AdOpTERS.

Technology has become mainstream and so has the lure of innovation

3

LOOKS

MATTER.

Innovation is now as much about the design as it is the technology

(14)

13

M/A/R/C Research and Ketchum Global Research & Analytics conducted an online survey among 4,094 working adults in five markets from Jan. 16, 2015 to Jan. 25, 2015. These markets included the United States, United Kingdom, Spain, Hong Kong and Mainland China. All respondents were screened for eligibility, which included being full or part-time employed, owning a consumer electronic product, and having broadband internet access. The global margin of error is +/-1.3

percent. The research explored how respondents view innovation in terms of role, definition and value. All data collection was handled by M/A/R/C Research.

SuRVEy METhOdOLOgy

For more information, visit

(15)

14

Susan leverages her 30 years of PR experience and deep connections with Silicon Valley to help firms transform from technology companies into power brands. Working with the agency’s technology specialists around the world to provide global and scalable expertise and services, Susan helps companies navigate challenging corporate reputation issues and create positive visibility that drives growth and revenue. Susan began her career at Ketchum and then founded San Francisco-based Access Communications in 1991, which became a division of Ketchum in 2008.

AbOuT ThE AuThOR

Susan Butenhoff

Partner and Director,

Ketchum’s Global Technology Practice [email protected]

+1 415 844 6268 @sbutenhoff

(16)

15

Ketchum is a leading global communications firm with operations in more than 70 countries across six continents. The winner of 11 Cannes Lions and an unprecedented four PRWeek Campaign of the Year Awards, Ketchum partners with clients to deliver strategic programming, game-changing creative and measurable results that build brands and reputations. For more information on Ketchum, a part of Diversified Agency Services, visit www.ketchum.com.

References

Related documents

If you want to ride Space Mountain, you need to visit what space

Financial Management Multi-Site Financials Budget Control Credit Management Cash Management Fixed Assets Financial Consolidation Invoice Matching

• The micro-scale fine structuration was realized in LTCC fuel processor through a novel progressive lamination. • The catalyst packed bed with YSZ beads could provide

From top to bottom it is possible to identify four layers, a User or Broker submits its requests using vari- ous applications to the utility computing system, the Service

We do not yet have comparative studies of Danish urban coin material from this period, but it is surely worth noting that main parts of the material are common types of small

Table 6 United Network for Organ Sharing Criteria for Cadaveric Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Cancer with Underlying Cirrhosis.. ➢ Patient is not a liver

Running the Java servlets on the Web server machine results in the lowest performance, with a peak throughput of 6,840 interactions per minute, reached for 700 clients.. PHP peaks