• No results found

CECS Glacier Research

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "CECS Glacier Research"

Copied!
36
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

CECS Glacier Research

Andrés Rivera and the CECs team

Laboratorio de Glaciología y Cambio Climático Centro de Estudios Científicos (CECS), Valdivia

(2)

Who we are?

SENIOR RESEARCHERS

Gino Casassa Andrés Rivera

ASSOCIATED RESEARCHERS

Robert Thomas, NASA Wallops Flight Facility, USA Eric Rignot, JPL-NASA, USA

Norbert Blindow, BGR

POST-DOCTORAL FELLOWS

Marious Schaefer Anja Wendt

ASSISTANT RESEARCHERS (present and formers)

Daniela Carrión (Geographer) Francisca Bown (Geographer MSc) Sebastián Cisternas (Computer Engineer)

Juan Andrés Uribe (Electronic Engineer) Rodrigo Zamora (Electronic Engineer)

Thomas Loriaux (MSc)

Claudio Bravo (presently at UCH)

Pablo Zenteno (presently in a private company)

RESIDENT OFFICERS

Max Fuentealba, Chilean Air Force

UNDERGRADUATES STUDENTS

(3)

Our key issues

 We would like to

 Define a Chilean glacier base line

 Study remote and “virgin” areas

 Apply airborne, ground and oceanographic geophysical methods

 Develop new technologies for glacier research

 Improve our capacity building effort

 Provide information for decision makers

 Trying to answer the following questions:

 How are the glaciers responding to climatic changes?

 Are all glaciers good indicators of climate change?

 What are the consequences of recent glacier behaviour for our population and economic activities?

 What are the consequences of human activities on glacier behaviour?

 Could be possible to model glacier dynamics and the consequences of the glacier responses?

(4)

Main problems for glaciological research in Chile

 Scarce and poor availability of field data

 Lack of regular and accurate glacier cartography

 Limited budgets for software/hardware/data/training/monitoring

 Inefficient and bureaucratic data distribution among national

institutions

 Reduced collaboration between scientists and institutions

 Few systematic monitoring programs

(5)

State of art in Chile

 Almost complete but out of date glacier inventory

 Frontal, areal and ice elevation changes have been analysed for

hundred of glaciers combining historical records, remotely sensed imagery and field data

 Preliminary satellite image data base

 GIS data base for restricted number of glaciers including surface

topography, frontal variations, available imagery

 Several glaciological methods have been applied; Remote sensing,

GPS, LIDAR, RES (ground, airborne, helicopter borne), Fixed cameras, AWS’s, Sonars, ice coring, modelling, runoff.

(6)

Some statistics

•Postgraduate people in glaciology: <10 •Pre-post degrees in glaciology: 0

•Institutions doing glacier research: <10

•Number of glaciology related grants funded in Chile in recent years: <15 (of 9979)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 DÉCADAS N ° P U BL IC AC IO N ES

(7)

Hydro-meteorological stations for glacier

studies

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

Distancia mínima a una fuente glaciar [km]

N úm er o de es tac iones 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Diferencia de elevación estacion-glaciar [m]

(8)

Previous CECs studies

 Glacier inventory

 Northern and Southern Patagonian icefields

 Aconcagua basin

 Cordillera Darwin, Mte Sarmiento, isla Santa Inés, isla Hoste

 Nevados de Payachatas

 Several ice-capped volcanoes in southern Chile

 Frontal, areal and volumetric changes

 Almost 150 studied glaciers all around the country

 Mass and energy balance

 In 2003, CECS initiated a systematic program on Glaciar Mocho at Volcán Mocho, in the Chilean lake District.

 Geodetic mass balance estimations in several glaciers

 There is one glacier where a mass balance model has been applied

 Several AWS´s installed on top of glaciers in central-southern Chile in combination with met data analysis and cameras

 Applied geophysics

 LIDAR of more than 40 glaciers.

 RES (ground and airborne) of more than 50 glaciers

 Sonar/calving studies of more than 5 glaciers

 Ice velocities in more than 5 glaciers (GPS, feature tracking cameras)

 Ice volcanic interactions using thermal cameras in 3 volcanoes

 Glacio-chemistry

 Several short ice cores and snow samples for biological and chemical studies

(9)

First glacier inventory south of the Estrecho de Magallanes: 3289km2 Isla Santa Inés: 274 km2

Monte Sarmiento: 273 km2

Cordillera Darwin: 2333 km2

Isla Hoste: 409 km2

(10)

A mountain glacier (Alpine?)

Glaciar Universidad

(11)

Field data collection and preliminary models:

-0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0 800 1600 2400 3200 Nº Registro D if er en ci a ( m ) 8 Mayo 2009 28 Marzo 2009 -5 0 5 10 15 20 0 800 1600 2400 3200 Nº de Registro T em p er at u ra ( ºC ) 28 Marzo 2009 8 Mayo 2009 Ablation Temperatures AWS at accumulation and ablation zones

0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 mm e q . a . Modelled versus measured ablation Records 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Dates G loba l R a di a ti on ( W m -2) Global radiation

(12)
(13)

Hydrological station affected by the

March 11, 2010 Earthquake

(14)

-7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 Altitud SRTM (m s.n.m.) C am b io s d e el eva ci ó n ( m /a) 1955/2009 2000/2009

(15)
(16)

Ice velocities from fixed cameras (m/d)

7 - 10 10 - 14 14 - 17 17 - 24

(17)
(18)

Thermal studies

Perfil Nocturno píxel 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 TºC 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Temperatura v/s pixel

Volcán Villarrica, Mayo 13, 2010

(19)
(20)

Accumulation (a), ablation (b) y mass balance (c) in m w. eq. a-1 (a) (b) (c) 2003/2004 2004/2005 (a) (b) (c) -0.88 +0.36

(21)

LIDAR and THERMAL surveys: Volcán Hudson

7 - 10

10 - 14 14 - 17 17 - 24

(22)

Some methods everywhere: Ice thickness

(23)
(24)
(25)

Helicopter borne radar

survey in Central Chile

A

B

A

B

Juncal Sur Glacier

(26)
(27)
(28)

CAMS profile versus SRTM

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 16000 17000 18000 19000 Distance (m) A lt it u d e ( m a e )

Outwash Plain Missing Lake

Outwash Plain Lake Ice

Ice

Lake Ice

Missing Lake

Lake Valley Lake River

SRTM 2000 CECS 2007 Sea Level Ice Lake Moraine Moraine

A

A’

A

A’

Glaciar Témpanos Glaciar Bernardo 1975-2000 -4.7± 0.8 -3.6 ± 0.8 2000-2007 -4.9 ± 3.0 -8.1 ± 3.0

(29)
(30)
(31)

October 10, 2008

(32)
(33)

Detail Glacier Monitoring Programme

(DGMP)

Northern Chile (CEAZA?)

- Glaciar Tapado - Location: 30°08’S

Central Chile (DGA-ACQWA-CECS-UCH?)

- Glaciares Juncal Norte, EchaurrenOlivares -Universidad

- Location: 33°-34°’S -

Lake District (CECS)

- Glaciares Chillán-Villarrica and Mocho - Location: 39°S Field Instrumentation - AWS - Gauge stations - Stake network - Photogrammetric cameras

Ground and airborne survey

- GPR and GPS

- Airborne and terrestrial Laser scanning

-Aerial photogrammetry

-Thermal and normal cameras

Aisén (DGA-CECS)

- Glaciar San rafael-Colonia - Nef- Jorge Montt

Location: 46-48°S

Magallanes

-Glaciar Pio XI (CECS) -Glaciar Grey (UMAG) -GCP (Trier U.)

Monitoring network

implementation

(34)

Future tasks

 CECs will hold an ACCION workshop in Valdivia

 In May 2012 we will have technical meeting (CECS-DGA) with USGS and

colleagues from VTI for testing GASS.

 In August 2012 we will have a training course in collaboration with the US

Embassy and the USGS (GASS). The idea is having a few days in Valdivia and then going to Volcán Mocho with colleagues from other institutions in Chile.

 Both workshops may be together or one after the other.

 Looking for new students

 Searching for Postdocs (mainly from abroad) interested in doing research in our

(35)

Conclusions and recommendations

 Most of our glaciers are retreating fast, however not everything is related to

Climate change¡¡¡¡ In Chile there are many “anomalies”.

 What is an anomaly? Each glacier has particular settings, and no one is an

easy one (Alpine?)

 We don’t have enough trained people to do research in the country

 We have a lot of requests from the government, private companies and the

academia, but we are too few and with limited time for everything

 Budget is also a restriction, especially when bureaucrats are taking control

of some funding agencies

 We don’t have people doing glacier modelling

 Modelling is very restrict due to the lack of data for many regions. We need

(36)

Thanks

CECS, FONDECYT, Fundación Andes, GLIMS,

References

Related documents

Diplomová práca Kúpeľný cestovný ruch na Slovensku v komparácii s Českom a jeho vplyv na rozvoj regiónu Piešťany sa zaoberá problematikou kúpeľného cestovného ruchu

MPLS, on the other hand, specifies ways that Layer 3 traffic can be mapped to connection-oriented Layer 2 transports like ATM and frame relay; it adds a label containing

On the higher level, a system configuration problem is solved to assign the product families to dedicated, flexible or reconfigurable resources, considering the uncertainty of

KEARNEY, MESQUITE, TX 75149 200 REPLACE DAMAGED RISER, FROM METER SOCKET TO WEATHERHEAD.. ELECTRIC COMPANY

PreventConnect is a national project of the California Coalition Against Sexual Assault sponsored by U.S.. Centers for Disease Control

Three different types of aurora, i.e., an active auroral arc at the substorm expansion phase, a stable arc prior to the substorm onset, and a diffuse aurora during the

The clustering rate is typically much faster and the maximum memory requirement is considerably lower, but the heuristic algorithms do not work as accurately as the best

In terms of reviewing the available literature relating to this particular research problem, there remains virtually no other published work that specifically addressed the issues