• No results found

Odd Even Graceful Labeling in Duplicate Graphs of certain Path and Star Related Graphs

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Odd Even Graceful Labeling in Duplicate Graphs of certain Path and Star Related Graphs"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Odd-Even Graceful Labeling in Duplicate Graphs of certain

Path and Star Related Graphs

S. Christopher

1

, P. Vijaya kumar

2

and K. Thulukkanam

3

1

Department of Mathematics, Voorhees College, Vellore - 632001, India

christyjoan2003@gmail.com

2

Department of Mathematics, Sriram Engineering College, Perumalpattu - 602024.

vijaysanthosh2002@gmail.com

3

Department of Mathematics, Dr. Ambedkar Govt. Arts College, Chennai 600039

thulukkanamk@gmail.com

Abstract

In this paper, we prove that the extended duplicate graphs of star graph, bistar

graph, double star graph, path graph, comb graph and twig graph admit odd-even

graceful labeling labeling.

AMS Subject Classification: 05C78

Key Words: Graph labeling, duplicate graph, odd-even graceful labeling.

1

Introduction

The concept of graph labeling was introduced by Rosa in 1967. A graph labeling is an

assign-ment of integers to the vertices or edges or both subject to certain condition(s). If the domain

of the mapping is the set of vertices (or edges), then the labeling is called a vertex labeling (or

(2)

over 2000 papers [1]]. The concept of duplicate graph was introduced by Sampath kumar and he

proved many results on it[2]. E. Sampath kumar introduced the concept of duplicate graph and

studied the charactarization of the the duplicate graphs[2]. Odd Even graceful was introduced

by R Sridevi, S Navaneethakrishnan, A Nagarajan, K Nagarajan[3]. Thirusangu, Ulaganathan

and Selvam, have proved that the duplicate graph of a path graphPm is Cordial [6]. Thirusangu,

Ulaganathan and Vijaya kumar have proved that the duplicate graph of Ladder graphLm,m≥2,

is cordial , total cordial and prime cordial[5]. Vijaya kumar, Ulaganathan and Thirusangu, proved

the existence of 3- Equitable and 3 - Cordial Labeling in Duplicate Graph of Some Graphs[6].

2

MAIN RESULTS

Definition 1. Let G(V, E) be a graph with p vertices and q edges. A function f : V →

{1,3,5, ...,2q+ 1} is called an odd-even graceful labeling, when each edgeuvis assigned the label

|f(u)−f(v)| such that the resulting edge labels are {2,4,6, ...,2q}. A graph which admits an

odd-even graceful labelingis called an odd-evengraceful graph. [3].

2.1

Algorithm - OEGS

V← {v1, v2, ..., vm, v

0

1, v

0

2, ..., v

0

m}.

E← {e1, e2, ..., em, e

0

1, e

0

2, ..., e

0

m−1}.

For 1≤k≤ m−1

vk←2k−1,v

0

k ←2m−2k−1;

Theorem 2. The extended duplicate graph of the star graphEDG(Sm),m≥2 admits odd

- even graceful labeling.

Proof. Let{v1, v2, ..., vm, v

0

1, v

0

2, ..., v

0

m}and{e1, e2, ..., em, e

0

1, e

0

2, ..., e

0

m−1}be the set of vertices

and the edges of theEDG(Sm). Using the algorithm OEGS, the 2mvertices are labeled using 1,

3, 5,..., 4m−1(= 2q+ 1). Using the induced functionf∗(uv) =|f(u)−f(v)|, the m−1 edges

namelye0m1,e0m2,e0m3,...,e02,e01receive labels 2, 4, 6,..., 2m−4, 2m−2 respectively, the edge e2mreceives label 2mand them−1 edges namelye1,e2,e3,...,em−2,em−1receive labels 2m+ 2,

(3)

4m−2(= 2q). Hence, the extended duplicate graph of the star graph EDG(Sm), m≥2 admits

odd-even graceful labeling.

2.2

Algorithm - OEGBS

V← {v1, v2, ..., v2m+2, v

0

1, v

0

2, ..., v

0

2m+2}

E← {e1, e2, ..., e2m+2, e

0

1, e

0

2, ..., e

0

2m+1}

Fixv1←1,v

0

1←4m+ 5;

For 1≤k≤ m+ 1

vk0+1←8m−2k+ 9;

For 1≤k≤ m

vm0 +k+2←6m−2k+ 7;

For 1≤k≤ 2m+ 1

vk+1←4m−2k+ 5;

Theorem 3. The extended duplicate graph of the bistar graphEDG(BSm),m≥2admits

odd - even graceful labeling.

Proof. Let{v1, v2, ..., v2m+2, v

0

1, v

0

2, ..., v

0

2m+2}and{e1, e2, ..., e2m+2, e

0

1, e

0

2, ..., e

0

2m+1}be the set

of vertices and the edges ofEDG(CBm). Using the algorithm OEGBS, 4m+ 4 vertices are labeled

using 1, 3, 5,..., 8m+ 7(= 2q+ 1). Using the induced functionf∗ defined in theorem 2, them+ 1

edges namelye1, e2, ..., em, em+1 receive labels 8m+ 6(= 2q), 8m+ 4, 8m+ 2,..., 6m+ 8, 6m+ 6

respectively, themedges namelye02m+1,e02m,e02m1,...,e0m+3,e0m+2 receive labels 6m+ 4, 6m+ 2, 6m,..., 4m+ 8, 4m+ 6 respectively, themedges namelyem+2,em+3,em+4,...,e2m,e2m+1receive

labels 4m+ 2, 4m, 4m−2,..., 2m+ 6, 2m+ 4 respectively, themedges namelye0m+1,e0m,e0m1,..., e02, e01 receive labels 2m+ 2, 2m, 2m−2,..., 4,2 respectively and the edge e2m+2 receives label 4m+ 4. Thus the 4m+ 3 edges are labeled with 2, 4, 6,..., 8m+ 6(= 2q). Hence the extended

duplicate graph of the bistar graphEDG(BSm) ,m≥2 admits odd - even graceful labeling.

2.3

Algorithm - OEGDS

V← {v1, v2, ..., v2m+1, v

0

1, v

0

2, ..., v

0

2m+1}

E← {e1, e2, ..., e2m+2, e

0

1, e

0

2, ..., e

0

2m}

(4)

vk+1←6m−2k+ 3;

For 1≤k≤ m+ 1

v0mk+2←8m−2k+ 5;

For 1≤k≤ m+ 1

v0m+k+1←2k+ 1;

Theorem 4. The extended duplicate graph of the double star graph EDG(DSm), m≥2

admits odd - even graceful labeling.

Proof. Let {v1, v2, ..., v2m+1, v

0

1, v

0

2, ..., v

0

2m+1} and {e1, e2, ..., e2m+1, e

0

1, e

0

2, ..., e

0

2m} be the set

of vertices and the edges of EDG(DSm). Using the algorithm OEGDS, the 4m+ 2 vertices are

labeled using 1, 3, 5,..., 8m+ 3(= 2q+ 1). Using the induced function f∗ defined in theorem

2, the m edges namely e01, e02, e03,...,e0m1, e0m receive labels 2, 4, 6,..., 2m−2, 2m respectively, themedges namelye2m,e2m−1, e2m−2,...,em+2, em+1 receive labels 2m+ 2, 2m+ 6, 2m+ 10,...,

6m−6, 6m−2 respectively, themedges namelye0m+1,e0m+2,e0m+3,...,e02m1, e02m receive labels 2m+ 4, 2m+ 8, 2m+ 12,..., 6m−4, 6m respectively, the m edges namely e1, e2, e3,..., em−1,

em receive labels 6m+ 4, 6m+ 6, 6m+ 8,..., 8m,8m+ 2 respectively and the edge e2m+1 receives

the label6m+ 2. Thus the 4m+ 1(= 2q) edges are labeled with 2, 4, 6,..., 8m+ 2(= 2q). Hence

the extended duplicate graph of the double star graph EDG(DSm) , m≥ 2 admits odd - even

graceful labeling.

Illustration:

1 v1 10 v1’ 11

3 v2 8 12 v2’ 13

6 14

5 v3 v3’ 15

4 16

7 v4 v4’ 17

2 18

9 v5 v5’ 19

EDG(S5)

0 v1 20 v1’ 21

19 v22 38 v2’ 39

4 36

17 v3 v3’ 37

6 34

15 v4 v4’ 35

8 32

13 v5 v5’ 33

10 30

11 v6 v6’ 31

9 v722 18 v7’ 29

24 16

7 v8 v8’ 27

26 14

5 v9 v9’ 25

28 12

3 v10 v10’23

EDG(BS4)

1 v1 32 v1’ 33

31 v2 2 34! v2’ 35

4 36

29 v3" #v3’ 37

6 38

27 v3$ % v4’ 39

8 40

25 v4& 10 42 ' v5’ 41

23 v6( ) v6’ 43

21 v7*14 28+ v7’ 3

18 24

19 v8, -v8’ 5

22 20

17 v9. / v9’ 7

26 16

15 v100 30 12 1 v10’ 9

13 v112 3 v11’11

EDG(DS5)

(5)

2.4

Algorithm - OEGP

V← {v1, v2, ..., vm+1, v

0

1, v

0

2, ..., v

0

m+1}

E← {e1, e2, ..., em+1, e

0

1, e

0

2, ..., e

0

m}

Case (i): whenmis odd

For 1≤k≤ m+ 1

2

v2k ←2k−1,v2k−1←2m−2k+ 3

v20k ←2m+ 2k+ 1,v20k1←4m−2k+ 5

Case (ii): whenmis even

For 1≤k≤ m

2

v2k ←2k−1,v2k−1←2m−2k+ 3

v20k ←2m+ 2k+ 1,v20k+1←4m−2k+ 5;

Theorem 5. The extended duplicate graph of the path graphEDG(Pm),m≥2admits odd

- even graceful labeling.

Proof. Let {v1, v2, ..., vm+1, v

0

1, v

0

2, ..., v

0

m+1} and {e1, e2, ..., em+1, e

0

1, e

0

2, ..., e

0

m} be the set of

vertices and the edges of theEDG(Pm).

Case (i): whenmis odd

Using the algorithm OEGP, the 2m+ 2 vertices are labeled using 1, 3, 5,..., 4m+ 3(= 2q+ 1).

Using the induced functionf∗ defined in theorem 2, the medges namely, e1 e

0

2,e3, e

0

4, e5, e

0

6,...,

em−2, e

0

m−1,em receive labels 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12,..., 2m−4, 2m−2, 2m respectively, them edges

namelye01,e2,e

0

3,e4,e

0

5,e6,...,e

0

m−2,em−1,e

0

m receive labels 4m+ 2(= 2q), 4m, 4m−2, 4m−4,

4m−6, 4m−8,..., 2m+ 8, 2m+ 6, 2m+ 4 respectively and the edgeem+1receives the label 2m+ 2.

Thus the 2m+ 1(=q) edges are labeled with 2, 4, 6,..., 4m+ 2(= 2q).

Case (ii): whenmis even

Using the algorithm OEGP, the 2m+ 2 vertices are labeled using 1, 3, 5,..., 4m+ 3(= 2q+ 1).

Using the induced functionf∗ defined in theorem 2, the medges namely, e1 e

0

2,e3, e

0

4, e5, e

0

6,...,

em−3, e

0

m−2,em−1,e

0

m receive labels 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12,..., 2m−6, 2m−4, 2m−2, 2mrespectively,

themedges namelye01,e2,e

0

3,e4,e

0

5,e6,...,e

0

m−3,em−2,e

0

m−1,emreceive labels 4m+ 2(= 2q), 4m,

4m−2, 4m−4, 4m−6, 4m−8,..., 2m+ 10, 2m+ 8, 2m+ 6, 2m+ 4 respectively and the edgeem+1

receives the label 2m+ 2. Thus the 2m+ 1(=q) edges are labeled with 2, 4, 6,..., 4m+ 2(= 2q).

(6)

graceful labeling.

2.5

Algorithm - OEGCB

V← {v1, v2, ..., v2m, v

0

1, v

0

2, ..., v

0

2m}

E← {e1, e2, ..., e2m, e

0

1, e

0

2, ..., e

0

2m−1}

Case (i): when mis odd

Fixv1←1,v

0

1←4m+ 1

For 1≤k≤ m−1

2

v4k←4k−1,v4k+1←4k+ 1,v4k−2←4m−4k+ 3,v4k−1←4m−4k+ 1,

v04k←4m−4k+ 7,v40k+1 ←4m−4k+ 9,v40k2←8m−4k+ 3,v04k1←8m−4k+ 1,; Case (ii): whenmis even

Fixv1←1,v

0

1←4m+ 1

For 1≤k≤ m−2

2

v4k←4k−1,v4k+1←4k+ 1;

v04k←4m+ 4k−1,v04k+1 ←4m+ 4k+ 1

For 1≤k≤ m

2

v4k−2←4m−4k+ 3,v4k−1←4m−4k+ 1;

v04k2←8m−4k+ 3,v40k1←8m−4k+ 1

Fork= 2m vk ←2m, v

0

k←6m+ 1;

Theorem 6. The extended duplicate graph of the comb graph EDG(CBm),m≥2 admits

odd - even graceful labeling.

Proof. Let{v1, v2, ..., v2m, v

0

1, v

0

2, ..., v

0

2m}and{e1, e2, ..., e2m, e

0

1, e

0

2, ..., e

0

2m−1}be the set of

ver-tices and the edges of theEDG(CBm).

Case (i): when mis odd

Using the algorithm OEGCB, the 4mvertices are labeled using 1, 3, 5,..., 8m−1(= 2q+ 1). Using

the induced function f∗ defined in theorem 2, the 2m−2 edges namelye01, e02, e3,e4, e

0

5, e

0

6,e7,

e8,..., e

0

2m−5, e

0

2m−4, e2m−3, e2m−2 receive labels 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16,..., 4m−10, 4m−8,

4m−6, 4m−4 respectively, the 3 edges e02m1, e2m, e2m−1 receive labels4m−2, 4m, 4m+ 2 respectively and the 2m−2 edges namely e02m2, e02m3, e2m−4, e2m−5,..., e

0

4, e

0

3, e2, e1 receive

(7)

4m−1(=q) edges are labeled with 2, 4, 6, 8, ..., 8m−2(= 2q).

Case (ii): whenmis even

Using the algorithm OEGCB, the 4mvertices are labeled using 1, 3, 5,..., 8m−1(= 2q+ 1). Using

the induced functionf∗ defined in theorem 2, the 2m−2 edges namely e01, e02,e3, e4, e

0

5,e

0

6, e7,

e8,...,e

0

2m−7, e

0

2m−6, e2m−5, e2m−4 receive labels 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16,..., 4m−14, 4m−12,

4m−10, 4m−8, 4m−6, 4m−4 respectively, the 2 edgese2m−1,e2m receive labels 4m−2, 4m

respectively and the edgee02m1receives label 4m+ 2 and the 2m−2 edges namelye2m−2,e2m−3,

e02m4, e02m5,e2m−6,e2m−7,...,e

0

4, e

0

3,e2, e1 receive labels 4m+ 4, 4m+ 6, 4m+ 8, 4m+ 10,...,

8m−8, 8m−6, 8m−4, 8m−2 respectively. Thus the 4m−1(=q) edges are labeled with 2, 4,

6, 8, ..., 8m−2(= 2q).

Hence, the extended duplicate graph of the comb graph EDG(CBm),m ≥2 admits odd - even

graceful labeling.

2.6

Algorithm - OEGT

V← {v1, v2, ..., v3m+2, v

0

1, v

0

2, ..., v

0

3m+2}

E← {e1, e2, ..., e3m+2, e

0

1, e

0

2, ..., e

0

3m+1}

Case (i): whenmis odd

Fixv1←6m+ 3,v2←1,v

0

1←12m+ 7,v

0

2←6m+ 5

For 1≤k≤ m+ 1

2

v6k−3←6m−6k+ 7,v6k−2←6m−6k+ 5,v6k−1←6m−6k+ 3;

v60k3←12m−6k+ 11,v06k2←12m−6k+ 9,v06k1←12m−6k+ 7;

For 1≤k≤ m−1

2

v6k ←6k−3,v6k+1←6k−1,v6k+2←6k+ 1;

v60k ←6m+ 6k+ 1,v60k+1←6m+ 6k+ 3,v06k+2←6m+ 6k+ 7;

Case (ii): whenmis even

Fixv1←6m+ 3,v2←1,v

0

1←12m+ 7,v

0

2←6m+ 5

For 1≤k≤ m

2

v6k−3←6m−6k+ 7,v6k−2←6m−6k+ 5,v6k−1←6m−6k+ 3,v6k←6k−3,v6k+1←6k−1,

v6k+2←6k+ 1;

v60k3 ← 12m−6k+ 11, v60k2 ← 12m−6k+ 9, v06k1 ← 12m−6k+ 7, v60k ← 6m+ 6k+ 1,

(8)

Theorem 7. The extended duplicate graph of the twig graphEDG(Tm),m≥2admits odd

- even graceful labeling.

Proof. Let{v1, v2, ..., v3m+2, v

0

1, v

0

2, ..., v

0

3m+2}and{e1, e2, ..., e3m+2, e

0

1, e

0

2, ..., e

0

3m+1}be the set

of vertices and the edges of theEDG(Tm).

Case (i): when mis odd

Using the algorithm OEGT, the 6m+ 4 vertices are labeled using 1, 3, 5,..., 12m+ 7(= 2q+ 1).

Using the induced function f∗ defined in theorem 2, the 3m−3 edges namely e2, e3, e4, e

0

5,

e06,e07,e8,e9,e10,e

0

11,e

0

12,e

0

13,...,e

0

3m−7,e

0

3m−6,e

0

3m−5,e3m−4,e3m−3,e3m−2receive labels 12m+ 4,

12m+ 2, 12m, 12m−2, 12m−4, 12m−6, 12m−8, 12m−10, 12m−12, 12m−14, 12m−16,...,

6m+ 22, 6m+ 20, 6m+ 18, 6m+ 16, 6m+ 14,6m+ 12 respectively, the 3m−3 edges namely

e02, e

0

3,e

0

4, e5, e6, e7,e

0

8,e

0

9,e

0

10,e11,e12,e13,...,e3m−7,e3m−6,e3m−5,e

0

3m−4,e

0

3m−3,e

0

3m−2 receive

labels 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16,18, 20, 22, 24,..., 6m−14, 6m−12, 6m−10, 6m−8, 6m−6, 6m−4

respectively, the 6 edges namelye03m1,e03m,e03m+1,e3m−1,e3m,e3m+1receive labels 6m−2, 6m, 6m+ 2, 6m+ 10, 6m+ 8, 6m+ 6 respectively and the 3 edges namelye1,e

0

1,e3m+2 receive labels

2, 12m+ 6(= 2q), 6m+ 4 respectively. Thus the 6m+ 3(=q) edges are labeled with 2, 4, 6, 8, ...,

12m+ 6(= 2q).

Case(ii): whenmis even

Using the algorithm OEGT, the 6m+ 4 vertices are labeled using 1, 3, 5,..., 12m+ 7(= 2q+ 1).

Using the induced function f∗defined in theorem 2, the 3medges namelye2,e3,e4,e

0

5,e

0

6,e

0

7,e8,

e9,e10,e

0

11, e

0

12,e

0

13,..., ,e3m−4,e3m−3,e3m−2,e

0

3m−1,e

0

3m,e

0

3m+1 receive labels 12m+ 4, 12m+ 2,

12m, 12m−2, 12m−4, 12m−6, 12m−8, 12m−10, 12m−12, 12m−14, 12m−16,..., 6m+ 16,

6m+ 14, 6m+ 12, 6m+ 10, 6m+ 8,6m+ 6 respectively, the 3medges namelye02,e03,e04,e5,e6,e7,

e08,e09,e010,e11,e12,e13,...,e

0

3m−4,e

0

3m−3,e

0

3m−2,e3m−1,e3m,e3m+1, receive labels 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12,

14, 16,18, 20, 22, 24,..., 6m−2, 6m, 6m+ 2 and the 3 edges namelye1,e

0

1, e3m+2 receive labels

2, 12m+ 6(= 2q), 6m+ 4 respectively. Thus the 6m+ 3(=q) edges are labeled with 2, 4, 6, 8, ...,

12m+ 6(= 2q).

Hence, the extended duplicate graph of the twig graph EDG(Tm), m ≥ 2 admits odd - even

graceful labeling.

(9)

9 v12 18 v1’ 19

1 v2 10 v2’ 11 4 16 7 v3 6 14 v3’ 17

3 v4 v4’ 13

5 v5 8 12 v5’ 15

EDG (P4)

1 v1 16 v1’ 17

15v22 30 v2’31 4 28 13v3 6 26 v3’ 29

3 v4 v4’19 24 8 5 v5 22 10 v5’21

11v6 v6’ 27 12 20 9 v7 v7’25

7 v8 18 14 v8’23

EDG (CB4)

21v1 2 42 v1’ 43

1 v2 22 v2’23

19v34 40 v3’41

17v4 6 8 36 38! v4’39

15v5" # v5’37

3 v6$34 10% v6’25

5 v7& 32 30 14 12'v7’27

7 v8( )v8’29

13v9*16 28+v9’35

11v10,28 20 24 26-v10’33

9 v11. /v11’31

[image:9.595.94.374.79.265.2]

EDG (T3)

Figure 2. Odd-Even Graceful labeling inEDG(P5), EDG(CB4)andEDG(T3)

3

Conclusion

We have proved that extended duplicate graphs of star graph, bistar graph, double star graph,

path graph, comb graph and twig graph admit odd - even graceful labeling.

References

[1] J.A. Gallian, A Dynamic Survey of Graph Labeling,The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics,

DS6 (2016).

[2] E. Sampath kumar, On duplicate graphs, Journal of the Indian Math. Soc., 37(1973), 285-293.

[3] R. Sridevi, S. Navaneethakrishnan and K. Nagarajan, Odd-Even graceful graphs,

J.Appl.Math. Informatics Vol.30 (2012), No. 5-6, pp. 913-923.

[4] K. Thirusangu, P.P. Ulaganathan and P. Vijaya kumar, Some cordial labeling of duplicate

graph of ladder graph,Annals of Pure and Applied Mathematics,8(2)(2014), 43-50.

[5] K. Thirusangu, P.P. Ulaganathan and B. Selvam. B, Cordial labeling in duplicate graphs, Int.

J. Compute Math. Sci. Appl. Vol 4, Nos(1-2) (2010) 179 186.

[6] Vijaya kumar. P, Ulaganathan. P.P and Thirusangu. K, 3Equitable and 3Cordial Labeling

in Duplicate Graph of Some Graphs, International Journal of Mathematical Archive-6(12),

Figure

Figure 2. Odd-Even Graceful labeling in EDG (P5) , EDG (CB4) andEDG (T3)

References

Related documents

In this study the quality of some herbal medicines sold in Nigeria were evaluated for basic pharmaceutical quality and compliance to regulatory guidelines.. Samples of

Habitat of Mesoclemmys vanderhaegei observed at the Ecological Station of Santa Barbara, Águas de Santa Bárbara municipality, state of São Paulo, southeastern Brazil..

Electronic technology Inter Integrated Circuit (I2C) temperature and humidity sensors SHT11 is a single chip temperature and relative humidity sensor with multi

To determine if hypoxia affects the expression of a subset of genes encoding pentose phosphate pathway enzymes, such as G6PD (glucose­6­phos­ phate dehydrogenase),

Conclusion: Infertility was due to various causes in the male or/and the female partner, however, infertility among couples were mostly due to the problem in females.. Infertility

protection from pollution from ships of the Lithuanian Shipping Company (LISCO,. 1996, Environmental protection on

survey questioning staff knowledge of the pediatric suicide risk screening tool, policy, and. actions taken when patients

Figure 27: The table shows how much resources have been allocated to this incident Figure 26: The Available Quantity changed after allocation.. Walk