• No results found

Computing the congruence class of some left restriction semigroups in ℘

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Computing the congruence class of some left restriction semigroups in ℘"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

_______________

*Corresponding author

E-mail address: [email protected] Received November 19, 2019

Available online at http://scik.org J. Semigroup Theory Appl. 2020, 2020:2

https://doi.org/10.28919/jsta/4378 ISSN: 2051-2937

COMPUTING THE CONGRUENCE CLASS OF SOME LEFT RESTRICTION SEMIGROUPS IN ℘𝕴𝑿

ABUBAKAR, R. B.1,*, ASIBONG-IBE, U. I.2 AND JACKREECE, P. C.2

1Department of Mathematics, Federal College of Education (Technical), Omoku, Rivers, Nigeria 2Department of Mathematics, University of Port harcourt, Rivers state, Nigeria

Copyright © 2020 the author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract: In this paper, we present some examples of left restriction semigroups embedded in the partial transformation ℘ℑ𝑋. Also, we compute and enumerates the congruence-class 𝑅 ̃ and the semilattice of idempotents

𝐸𝑋inherent in the examples generated.

Key words: left restriction semigroups; partial transformation; Green’s relation; congruence-class.

2010 AMS Subject Classification: 20M20.

1.INTRODUCTION

Partial transformation semigroup ℘ℑ𝑋 is a weakly left 𝐸-ample semigroup otherwise known as

Left restriction semigroup. The 𝐸 refers to a particular semilattice refered to as partial identities

on 𝑋. ℘ℑ𝑆 is a (2,1)-subalgebra of ℘ℑ𝑋 where the unary operation

+: 𝛼 ⟼ 𝐼𝑑𝑜𝑚 𝛼

Let 𝑋 be a non empty set, ℘ℑ𝑋 contains a semilattice of idempotents

𝐸𝑋 = {𝐼𝐴: 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋}

𝐸𝑋is the semilattice of idempotents, the partial identities.

(2)

𝛼+ = 𝐼 𝑑𝑜𝑚 𝛼

for each 𝛼 ∈℘ℑ𝑋. Let 𝑆 be a semigroup of ℘ℑ𝑋 and let 𝐸 be the set

𝐸 = {𝐼𝑍 ∈ 𝐸𝜆: 𝑍 = 𝑑𝑜𝑚 𝛼 , 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝛼 ∈ 𝑆}

℘ℑ𝑋 is closed under + , ℘ℑ𝑋 is a left restriction semigroup. The equivalence relation 𝑅̃ on 𝑆 is

defined by the rule that

𝑎 𝑅 ̃ 𝑏 ⇔ ∀ 𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 { 𝑒𝑎 = 𝑎 ⇔ 𝑒𝑏 = 𝑏 }

For 𝑎, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆, two elements 𝑎, 𝑏 are 𝑅̃𝐸-related iff they have the same left identities in 𝐸. For

𝐸 = 𝐸(𝑆), we denote 𝑅̃ 𝐸 by 𝑅 ̃

Note 𝑅 ̃ ⊆𝑅̃𝐸 for any 𝐸. [3]

Equally, the relation 𝑅̃𝐸 on 𝑆 is defined by the rule that for any 𝑎, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆,

𝑎 𝑅̃ 𝑏𝐸 if f ∀ 𝑒 ∈ 𝐸, 𝑒𝑎 = 𝑎 iff 𝑒𝑏 = 𝑏

Left restriction semigroups form a variety of unary semigroups, that is, semigroups equipped

with an additional unary operation denoted by + . The identities that define a left restriction semigroup S are:

𝑎+𝑎 = 𝑎, 𝑎+𝑏+ = 𝑏+𝑎+ , (𝑎+𝑏)+ = 𝑎+𝑏+ , 𝑎𝑏+ = (𝑎𝑏)+𝑎

we put 𝐸 = {𝑎+ ∶ 𝑎 ∈ 𝑆}

E is a semilattice known as the semilattice of projections of S. Dually, right restriction

semigroups form a variety of unary semigroups. In this case, the unary operation is denoted by *.

Left/Right restriction semigroup emanated from the study of Partial transformation monoids.

Suppose a weakly left E-adequate semigroup satisfies the left congruence condition with respect

to E, suppose that it also satisfies the left ample condition that for all 𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 and 𝑒 ∈ 𝑆

𝑎𝑒 = (𝑎𝑒)+𝑎

if 𝐸 = 𝐸 (𝑆) ,where S is weakly left E-ample. Then, S denote a left restriction (formerly weakly

left E-ample) [2].

2.PRELIMINARIES

(3)

3

ABUBAKAR, R. B., ASIBONG-IBE, U. I. AND JACKREECE, P. C.

Green’s relation are five equivalence relations ℛ, ℒ, ℋ, ℑ 𝐷,that characterise the elements of a

semigroup in terms of principal ideals the generate. The relations are named for James Alexander

Green, who introduced them. John Mackintosh Howie, a prominent semigroup theorist,

remarked that on encountering a new semigroup, almost the first question one asks is ‘What are

the Greens relations like?’

For elements 𝑎 and 𝑏 of S, Green relations, ℒ, ℛ, ℑ , ℋ, 𝐷, are defined by

𝑎ℒ𝑏𝑖𝑓𝑓 𝑆 𝑎 = 𝑆𝑏

𝑎ℛ𝑏𝑖𝑓𝑓 𝑎𝑆 = 𝑏𝑆

𝑎ℑ𝑏𝑖𝑓𝑓 𝑆𝑎𝑆 = 𝑆𝑏𝑆

𝑎ℋ𝑏𝑖𝑓𝑓 𝑎ℒ𝑏 and 𝑎ℛ𝑏

𝑎𝐷 𝑏𝑖𝑓𝑓 there exists a 𝑐 in 𝑆 such that 𝑎ℒ𝑐 and 𝑐ℛ𝑏

That is, a and b are ℒ −related if they generate the same left ideal , ℛ-related if they generate the

same right ideal and ℑ −related if they generate the same two-sided ideal. These are equivalence

relations on S, so each of them yields a partition of 𝑆 into.[4]

2.2 Left restriction semigroup

A semigroup S is left restriction with respect to 𝐸 ⊆ 𝐸 (𝑆) if `

i. 𝐸 is a subsemilattice of S

ii. Every element 𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 is 𝑅̃𝐸 -related to an element of 𝐸 (denoted by 𝑎+)

iii. 𝑅̃𝐸 is a left congruence

iv. The left ample condition holds ∀ 𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑒 ∈ 𝐸,

𝑎𝑒 = (𝑎𝑒)+𝑎

Equivalently,

A semigroup S is a right restriction with respect to 𝐸 = 𝐸 (𝑆) if

i. 𝐸 is a subsemilattice of S

ii. Every element 𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 is 𝐿̃𝐸 -related to an element of 𝐸 (denoted by 𝑎+)

iii. 𝐿̃𝐸 is a left congruence

(4)

𝑒𝑎 = 𝑎(𝑒𝑎)+

2.3 Remark

Left restriction semigroups are algebra defined by the following identities

i. (𝑥𝑦)𝑧 = 𝑥(𝑦𝑧)

ii. 𝑥+𝑥 = 𝑥

iii. 𝑥+ 𝑦+= 𝑦+𝑥+

iv. (𝑥+𝑦)+ = 𝑥+ 𝑦+

v. 𝑥𝑦+ = (𝑥𝑦)+𝑥

vi. (𝑎+)∗= 𝑎+ and (𝑎∗)+ = 𝑎+

2.4 Notation

These identities imply 𝑥+𝑥+ = 𝑥+, (𝑥+)+ = 𝑥+

Proof (𝑥+)+ = (𝑥+𝑥+)+ = (𝑥+𝑥)+ = 𝑥+ [2] 2.5 Raf-baduT program

Raf-baduT was designed to generate elements of partial transformation and has the features :

Order of the ℘ℑ{𝑋}, elements position dropdown, View state, Three Representations :

Semigroup, notation and daga . The programme is designed for orders X=

{2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20} .After the examples were obtained, the

algebraic properties of left congruences of 𝑅̃𝑠 –classes and from their semilattices of

idempotents, the partial identities 𝐸𝑋 were obtained.

3.MAIN RESULTS

3.1 Computing the congruence class 𝑹̃𝑺 –class and partial identities 𝑬̃𝒔

i. ℘𝑇{1,2,3} given by

(5)
(6)

Where

A= (1 2 3

1 𝑥 2), 𝐵 = (1), 𝐶 = (1 2 3 𝑥 2 𝑥) 𝐷 = ( 1 2 3𝑥 𝑥 2 ) , 𝐹 = (1 2 33 𝑥 𝑥),

𝐺 = (1 2 32 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐻 = ( 1 2 3

𝑥 1 𝑥 ), 𝐼 = (1 2 3𝑥 𝑥 1),J= (1 2 3𝑥 3 𝑥), 𝐾 = (1 2 3𝑥 𝑥 3),

𝐿 = (1 2 3

3 2 𝑥 ) , 𝑀 = (1 2 33 𝑥 2), 𝑁 = (1 2 32 3 𝑥),𝑂 = (1 2 32 𝑥 3), P= ( 1 2 31 3 𝑥 ),

𝑄 = (1 2 31 𝑥 3), 𝑅 = (1 2 3

𝑥 2 3), 𝑆′ = (1 2 3𝑥 3 2), 𝑇 = (1 2 3𝑥 1 2 ) , 𝑈 = (1 2 3𝑥 2 1),

𝑉 = (1 2 3

2 𝑥 1), 𝑊 = (1 2 32 1 𝑥), 𝑋 = (1 2 31 2 𝑥 ) , 𝑌 = (1 2 33 1 𝑥), 𝐴1 = (1 2 33 𝑥 1),

B1= (1 2 3

𝑥 3 1), 𝐶1 = (1 2 3𝑥 1 3 ) , 𝜀 = (1 2 3𝑥 𝑥 𝑥), The 𝑅̃𝑠 –classes are :

𝑅̃ = {𝐴, 𝑃, 𝑄, 𝑋}𝐵 , 𝑅̃ = {𝐿, 𝑅, 𝑈, 𝑋}𝐶 , 𝑅̃ = {𝐾, 𝑂, 𝑄, 𝑅, 𝑆, 𝐶1}𝐷 , 𝑅̃ = {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑃, 𝑄, 𝑋}𝐺 , 𝑅̃ = {𝐶, 𝐿, 𝑅, 𝑈, 𝑋}𝐻 ,

𝑅𝐼

̃ = {𝐾, 𝑂, 𝑄, 𝐶1}𝑅̃ = { 𝐶, 𝐿, 𝑅, 𝑈, 𝑋}𝐽 , 𝑅̃ = {𝐾, 𝑂, 𝑄, 𝑅, 𝐶1}𝐾 , and 𝑅̃ =𝐸

{ 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, 𝐼, 𝐽, 𝐾, 𝐿, 𝑀, 𝑁, 𝑂, 𝑃, 𝑄, 𝑅, 𝑆, 𝑇, 𝑈 , 𝑉 , 𝑊 𝑋, 𝑌, 𝐴1, 𝐵1, 𝐶1}

II. ℘𝑇{1,2,3,4} : 𝑆 = {𝛼, 𝛼+, 𝛽, 𝛾, 𝛾+, 𝜎, 𝜎+, 𝜀}

𝛼 = (1 2 3 4

2 1 𝑥 𝑥), 𝛽 = (1 2 3 4𝑥 2 3 4), 𝛾 = (1 2 3 42 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) 𝜎 = (1 2 3 4𝑥 1 𝑥 𝑥) 𝛼+ =

(1 2 3 41 2 𝑥 𝑥), 𝛾+ = (1 2 3 4

1 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥), 𝜎+ = (1 2 3 4𝑥 2 𝑥 𝑥)𝜀 = (1 2 3 4𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥)

+ 𝛼 𝛽 𝛼+ 𝛾 𝛾+ 𝜎 𝜎+ 𝜀

𝛼 𝛼+ 𝛾 𝛼 𝜎+ 𝜎 𝛾+ 𝛾 𝜀

𝛽 𝜎 𝛽 𝜎+ 𝜀 𝜀 𝜎 𝜎+ 𝜀

𝛼+ 𝛼 𝜎+ 𝛼+ 𝛾 𝛾+ 𝜎 𝜎+ 𝜀

𝛾 𝛾+ 𝛾 𝛾 𝜀 𝜀 𝜎+ 𝜎 𝜀

𝛾+ 𝛾 𝜀 𝛾+ 𝛾 𝛾+ 𝜀 𝜀 𝜀

𝜎 𝜎+ 𝜀 𝜎 𝜎+ 𝜎 𝜀 𝜀 𝜀

𝜎+ 𝜎 𝜎+ 𝜎+ 𝜀 𝜀 𝜎 𝜎+ 𝜀

(7)

7

ABUBAKAR, R. B., ASIBONG-IBE, U. I. AND JACKREECE, P. C.

As S is closed under composition and + , S is a (2,1)-subalgebra of ℘ℑ

{1,2,3,4}and so S is

left restriction semigroup with distinguished semilattice.

𝐸𝑠 = {𝛼+, 𝛽, 𝛾+, 𝜎+, 𝜀} [2]

The 𝑅̃𝑠 –classes are : 𝑅̃ = {𝛾 𝛼+, 𝛾+}, 𝑅̃ = {𝜎 𝛼+, 𝛽, 𝜎+},𝑅̃ = {𝜎+ 𝛼+, 𝛽} and 𝑅̃ =𝐸

{𝛼+, 𝛽, 𝛾+, 𝜎+}

iii. ℘𝑇{1,2,3,4}: 𝑆 = { 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, 𝐼, 𝐽, 𝐾, 𝐿, 𝑀, 𝑁, 𝑂, 𝑃, 𝐸}

where 𝐴 = (1 2 3 4

1 4 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐵 = (1 2 3 41 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐶 = (1 2 3 4𝑥 3 𝑥 𝑥) 𝐷 = (1 2 3 44 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥),

𝐹 = (1 2 3 4

3 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐺 = (1 2 3 42 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐻 = (1 2 3 4𝑥 1 𝑥 𝑥) 𝐼 = (1 2 3 4𝑥 4 𝑥 𝑥),

𝐽 = (1 2 3 4𝑥 𝑥 4 𝑥), 𝐾 = (1 2 3 4

𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 4), 𝐿 = (1 2 3 43 4 𝑥 𝑥) 𝑀 = (1 2 3 4𝑥 2 𝑥 𝑥),

𝑁 = (1 2 3 4

4 3 𝑥 𝑥), 𝑂 = (1 2 3 4𝑥 𝑥 3 𝑥), 𝑃 = (1 2 3 43 𝑥 4 𝑥) , 𝜀 = ( 1 2 3 4𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) The 𝑅̃𝑠 –classes are:

𝑅̃ = 𝑅𝐴 ̃ = 𝑅𝐷 ̃ = 𝑅𝐹 ̃ = { 𝐺 𝐴, 𝐵} , 𝑅̃ = { 𝐸 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, 𝐼, 𝐽, 𝐾, 𝐿, 𝑀, 𝑁, 𝑂, 𝑃}

iv. ℘𝑇{1,2,3,4} : 𝑆 = { 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, 𝐼, 𝐽, 𝐾, 𝐿, 𝑀, 𝑁, 𝑂, 𝐸}

where

𝐴 = ( 1 2 3 4

1 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐵 = (1 2 3 4𝑥 3 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐶 = (1 2 3 44 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) 𝐷 = (1 2 3 43 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥),

𝐹 = (1 2 3 42 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐺 = (1 2 3 4

𝑥 1 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐻 = (1 2 3 4𝑥 4 𝑥 𝑥) 𝐼 = (1 2 3 4𝑥 𝑥 4 𝑥),

𝐽 = (1 2 3 44 3 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐾 = (1 2 3 4

𝑥 𝑥 3 𝑥), 𝐿 = (1 2 3 43 4 𝑥 𝑥) 𝑀 = (1 2 3 4𝑥 2 𝑥 𝑥),

𝑁 = (1 2 3 4

3 𝑥 4 𝑥), 𝑂 = (1 2 3 4𝑥 4 3 𝑥), 𝜀 = (1 2 3 4𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) 𝐸𝑠 = {𝐴, 𝐽, 𝐿, 𝑁, 𝐸} The 𝑅̃𝑠 –class is : 𝑅̃ = { 𝐸 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, 𝐼, 𝐽, 𝐾, 𝐿, 𝑀, 𝑁, 𝑂}

v. ℘𝑇{1,2,3,4,5} : 𝑆 = { 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, 𝐼, 𝐽, 𝐾, 𝐸}

𝐴 = ( 1 2 3 4 5

2 𝑥 𝑥 5 4), 𝐵 = (1 2 3 4 5𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 4 5), 𝐶 = (1 2 3 4 5𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 4),

𝐷 = ( 1 2 3 4 5

3 𝑥 𝑥 4 5), 𝐹 = (1 2 3 4 53 𝑥 𝑥 5 4)𝐺 = ( 1 2 3 4 5𝑥 3 𝑥 5 4),

𝐻 = (1 2 3 4 5

(8)

𝐾 = (1 2 3 4 5

𝑥 2 𝑥 4 5) 𝜀 = (1 2 3 4 5𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) 𝐸𝑠 = {𝐵, 𝐻, 𝐾, 𝜀} The 𝑅̃𝑠 –classes are:

𝑅̃ = {𝐷, 𝐺, 𝐼, 𝐾}𝐵 , 𝑅̃ = {𝐵, 𝐷, 𝐺, 𝐼, 𝐾}𝐶 , ̃ = 𝑅𝑅𝐽 ̃ = { 𝐺 𝐻, 𝐾} and 𝑅̃ = { 𝐸 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, 𝐼, 𝐽, 𝐾}

vi. ℘ℑ{1,2,3,4,5} ∶ 𝑆 = {𝛼, 𝛽, 𝛼+, 𝜏, 𝜏+}

𝛼 = ( 1 2 3 4 5

2 𝑥 𝑥 5 4),𝛽 = ( 1 2 3 4 53 𝑥 𝑥 5 4), 𝜏 = (1 2 3 4 5𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 4),

𝛼+ = ( 1 2 3 4 5

1 𝑥 𝑥 4 5), 𝜏+ = (1 2 3 4 5𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 4 5)

+ 𝛼+ 𝛼 𝛽 𝜏+ 𝜏

𝛼+ 𝛼+ 𝛼 𝛽 𝜏+ 𝜏

𝛼 𝜏 𝜏+ 𝜏+ 𝜏 𝜏+

𝛽 𝜏 𝜏+ 𝜏+ 𝜏 𝜏+

𝜏+ 𝜏+ 𝜏 𝜏 𝜏+ 𝜏

𝜏 𝜏 𝜏+ 𝜏+ 𝜏 𝜏+

As S is closed under composition and + , S is a (2,1)-subalgebra of ℘ℑ

{1,2,3,4,5} and so S

is left restriction semigroup with distinguished semilattice. 𝐸𝑠 = {𝜏+, 𝛼+} The 𝑅̃𝑠 –classes are: 𝑅̃ = {𝑠 𝛼+, 𝛼, 𝛽,}& { 𝜏+, 𝜏} [3]

vii.℘𝑇{1,2,3,4,5,6} : 𝑆 = { 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐸}

𝐴 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6

2 4 3 𝑥 5 1), 𝐵 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 64 𝑥 3 𝑥 5 2), 𝐶 = (1 2 3 4 5 6𝑥 𝑥 3 𝑥 5 4),

𝐷 = (1 2 3 4 5 6

𝑥 𝑥 3 𝑥 5 𝑥) ,𝜀 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥)𝐸𝑠 = {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐸} The 𝑅̃𝑠 –classes are : 𝑅̃ = {𝐴, 𝐵}𝐶 , 𝑅̃ = { 𝐷 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} and 𝑅̃ = { 𝐸 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} viii. ℘𝑇{1,2,3,4,5,6}

𝑆 = { 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, 𝐼 , 𝐽, 𝐾, 𝐿, 𝑀, 𝑁, 𝑂, 𝑃, 𝑄, 𝑅, 𝑆∗, 𝑇, 𝑈, 𝑉, 𝑊, 𝑋, 𝑌, 𝐴1, 𝐵1, 𝐶1, 𝐷1, 𝐹1, 𝐺1,

𝐻1, 𝐼1, 𝐽1, 𝐾1, 𝐿1, 𝑀1, 𝑁1, 𝑂1, 𝑃1, 𝑄1, 𝑅1, 𝐸}

𝐴 = (1 2 3 4 5 63 𝑥 4 5 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐵 = (1 2 3 4 5 6

4 𝑥 5 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐶 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 65 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥),

𝐷 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 66 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) 𝐹 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6

𝑥 6 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐺 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6𝑥 𝑥 6 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥),

(9)

9

ABUBAKAR, R. B., ASIBONG-IBE, U. I. AND JACKREECE, P. C.

𝐾 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6

𝑥 𝑥 5 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐿 = (1 2 3 4 5 64 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) 𝑀 = (1 2 3 4 5 6𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 6 𝑥) ,

𝑁 = (1 2 3 4 5 6

5 𝑥 𝑥 6 𝑥 𝑥), 𝑂 = (1 2 3 4 5 6𝑥 5 6 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥), 𝑃 = (1 2 3 4 5 6𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 𝑥 𝑥),

𝑄 = (1 2 3 4 5 6

6 𝑥 5 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) ,𝑅 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6𝑥 4 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥), 𝑆 = (1 2 3 4 5 6𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 6),

𝑇 = (1 2 3 4 5 6

6 5 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) 𝑈 = (1 2 3 4 5 65 6 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) , 𝑉 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 65 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 6 𝑥),

𝑊 = (1 2 3 4 5 6

𝑥 5 𝑥 6 𝑥 𝑥), 𝑋 = (1 2 3 4 5 6𝑥 6 5 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) 𝑌 = (1 2 3 4 5 6𝑥 𝑥 4 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) ,

𝐴1 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6

3 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐵1 = (1 2 3 4 5 65 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 6), 𝐶1 = (1 2 3 4 5 66 5 4 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥)

𝐷1 = (1 2 3 4 5 6

𝑥 3 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) , 𝐹1 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 65 6 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐺1 = (1 2 3 4 5 6𝑥 𝑥 3 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥),

𝐻1 = (1 2 3 4 5 62 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) 𝐼1 = (1 2 3 4 5 65 4 6 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) , 𝐽1 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 𝑥),

𝐾1 = (1 2 3 4 5 66 𝑥 𝑥 5 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐿1 = (1 2 3 4 5 6

𝑥 5 𝑥 𝑥 6 𝑥) 𝑀1 = (1 2 3 4 5 6𝑥 𝑥 5 6 𝑥 𝑥) ,

𝑁1 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 64 𝑥 5 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) 𝑂1 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6

𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5) 𝑃1 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 65 4 𝑥 6 𝑥 𝑥)

𝑄1 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6𝑥 6 𝑥 5 𝑥 𝑥) 𝑅1 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6

𝑥 5 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 6) 𝜀 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) 𝐸𝑠 = {𝑆, 𝐺1, 𝐾1, 𝐸}

The 𝑅̃𝑠 –classes are : 𝑅̃ = {𝐵1, 𝑅1}𝑆 and 𝑅̃ = { 𝑂1 𝑅1, 𝐵1, 𝑆∗} ix.℘𝑇{1,2,3,4,5,6,7} : 𝑆 = { 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, 𝐼, 𝐽, 𝐾, 𝐸}

𝐴 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

𝑥 2 5 6 3 1 𝑥), 𝐵 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7𝑥 2 3 1 5 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐶 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7𝑥 2 5 𝑥 3 𝑥 𝑥 ) ,

𝐷 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

𝑥 2 3 𝑥 5 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐹 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 77 2 5 𝑥 3 𝑥 𝑥 ), 𝐺 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7𝑥 2 3 𝑥 5 7 𝑥) ,

𝐻 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7

𝑥 2 5 7 3 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐼 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 77 2 3 𝑥 5 𝑥 𝑥 ), 𝐽 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7𝑥 2 5 𝑥 3 7 𝑥) ,

𝐾 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7

𝑥 2 3 7 5 𝑥 𝑥) , 𝜀 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) , 𝐸𝑠 = {𝐷, 𝐸} The 𝑅̃𝑠 –classes are:

(10)

𝐴 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

3 4 𝑥 𝑥 5 6 1 𝑥), 𝐵 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 6 3 𝑥),

𝐶 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 6 𝑥 𝑥 ) , 𝐷 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 88 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 6 𝑥 𝑥),

𝐹 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 6 8 𝑥 ), 𝐺 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8𝑥 8 𝑥 𝑥 5 6 𝑥 𝑥) ,

𝐻 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

𝑥 8 𝑥 𝑥 5 6 𝑥 𝑥) , 𝜀 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) , 𝐸𝑠 = {𝐶, 𝐸} The 𝑅̃𝑠 –classes are : 𝑅̃ = {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐷, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻}𝐶 and 𝑅̃ = { 𝐸 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, }

xi. ℘𝑇{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8} : 𝑆 = { 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, 𝐼, 𝐽, 𝐸}

𝐴 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 4 2 𝑥 5 6 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐵 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 𝑥 4 𝑥 5 6 𝑥 𝑥),

𝐶 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 6 𝑥 𝑥 ) , 𝐷 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 6 𝑥 𝑥),

𝐹 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 88 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 6 𝑥 𝑥 ), 𝐺 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 6 𝑥 𝑥) ,

𝐻 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 84 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 6 𝑥 𝑥) 𝐼 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 6 𝑥 𝑥),

𝐽 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 82 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 6 𝑥 𝑥)

𝜀 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐸𝑠 = {𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝜀}

The 𝑅̃𝑠 –classes are : 𝑅̃ = {𝐴, 𝐵}𝐶 , 𝑅̃ = 𝑅𝐹 ̃ = 𝑅𝐼 ̃ = 𝑅𝐺 ̃ = 𝑅𝐽 ̃ = { 𝐻 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} and 𝑅̃ =𝐸

{ 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, 𝐼, 𝐽}

xii.℘𝑇{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8} : 𝑆 = { 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, 𝐼, 𝐽, 𝐸}

𝐴 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 83 𝑥 4 5 7 1 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐵 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4 𝑥 5 7 𝑥 3 𝑥 𝑥),

𝐶 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

5 𝑥 7 𝑥 𝑥 5 𝑥 𝑥 ) , 𝐷 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 87 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 𝑥 𝑥),

𝐹 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 7 𝑥 𝑥 ), 𝐺 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 88 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 6 𝑥 𝑥) ,

𝐻 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 8 𝑥 𝑥) , 𝐼 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 83 𝑥 4 5 7 1 𝑥 𝑥),

𝐽 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

𝑥 𝑥 8 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥), 𝐾 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 87 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 ) ,

𝐿 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

(11)

11

ABUBAKAR, R. B., ASIBONG-IBE, U. I. AND JACKREECE, P. C.

𝑁 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8𝑥 8 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 7 𝑥 𝑥),𝑂 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 8 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) 𝑃 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 87 𝑥 8 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 )

𝜀 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥) 𝐸𝑠 = {𝜀}

The 𝑅̃𝑠 –class is : 𝑅̃ = { 𝐸 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, 𝐼, 𝐽, 𝐾, 𝐿, 𝑀, 𝑁, 𝑂, 𝑃}

xiii. ℘𝑇{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9} : 𝑆 = { 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, 𝐼, 𝐽, 𝐸} 10 elements

𝐴 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

2 𝑥 6 1 5 𝑥 7 8 𝑥), 𝐵 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 2 5 𝑥 7 8 𝑥),

𝐶 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 𝑥 7 8 𝑥 ) , 𝐷 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 99 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 𝑥 7 8 𝑥),

𝐹 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 9 5 𝑥 7 8 𝑥 ), 𝐺 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9𝑥 9 𝑥 𝑥 5 𝑥 7 8 𝑥) ,

𝐻 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9𝑥 9 𝑥 𝑥 5 𝑥 7 8 𝑥) , 𝐼 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 6 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5 𝑥 7 8 𝑥),

𝐽 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 6 5 𝑥 7 8 𝑥)

𝐸𝑠 = {𝐶}

The 𝑅̃𝑠 –class is: 𝑅̃ = { 𝐶 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, 𝐼, 𝐽}

𝑥𝑖𝑣.℘𝑇{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10} : 𝑆 = { 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐹, 𝐺, 𝐻, 𝐼, 𝐽, 𝐾, 𝐿, 𝐸}

𝐴 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

9 𝑥 4 5 1 7 8 𝑥 2 𝑥), 𝐵 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 102 𝑥 5 1 9 8 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 ),

𝐷 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

𝑥 𝑥 9 2 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 ), 𝐹 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10𝑥 𝑥 2 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥)

𝐺 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

10 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 ), 𝐻 = (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 10 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 ),

𝐼 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 10 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 ) 𝐽 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 𝑥 𝑥 10 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 ),

𝐾 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

𝑥 10 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 ) , 𝐿 =

( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 10 𝑥 )

𝜀 = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 ) 𝐸𝑠 = {𝐸}

(12)

CONCLUSION

This work extends [1] where some left restriction semigroups embedded in partial transformation ℘ℑ𝑋 {𝑋 = 1,2,3,45,6,7,8,9,10} were computed ,in here, their left congruence- classes in the

form of 𝑅̃𝑠 –class and partial identities 𝐸𝑠 have been computed.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

REFERENCES

[1] R. B. Abubakar and U.I. Asibong-ibe, On some restriction semigroups embedded in partial transformation ℘ℑX, J. Math. Assoc. Nigeria, 45(1)(2018), 250-259.

[2] C. Cornock, Restriction semigroups: Structure varieties and presentations, Doctoral thesis, University of York (2011).

[3] V. Gould, C. Hollings, Partial actions of Inverse and weakly left E-ample semigroups. J. Aust. Maths. Soc. (2009), 355-377.

References

Related documents

Analysis of the Fossa Volumes of the Human Cranial Base in the Fetal Period.. Analiza objętości dołów podstawy czaszki człowieka w

A – patients with normal postoperative PAP, B1 – patients with temporarily elevated PAP and without PH crisis, B2 – patients treated conventionally for PH crisis, B3 – patients

Microsoft Word MScThesisLauraDanieleFINAL doc Towards a Rule based Approach for Context Aware Applications Laura Maria Daniele Thesis for a Master of Science degree in

Balls move towards the participant from one of 10 bins (bins not displayed to participant). B) Hand trajectories for the left and right hands during the task of an

Patients with chronic LBP reporting high levels of pain self-efficacy also demonstrate higher levels of activity, work- ing endurance, exercise/stretching performing [23],

Furthermore, we studied the effect of GnRHa on Sertoli cells by analyzing differential Sertoli cell specific gene expression after GnRHa treatment in Ad- testes.. Our findings

After reviewing the previous research on the fractional evolution equations and inclusions of Sobolev type, we find that most of the works assume that the semigroup generated by – AE

This was due to significantly shorter ( p <0.001) mean durations of anaesthesia and operation (which resulted in lower salary and opportunity costs), shorter length of stay (mean