• No results found

On the convolution product of the distributional kernel Kα,β,γ,ν

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "On the convolution product of the distributional kernel Kα,β,γ,ν"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

PII. S0161171203106151 http://ijmms.hindawi.com © Hindawi Publishing Corp.

ON THE CONVOLUTION PRODUCT

OF THE DISTRIBUTIONAL

KERNEL

K

α,β,γ,ν

A. KANANTHAI and S. SUANTAI

Received 18 June 2001 and in revised form 19 February 2002

We introduce a distributional kernelKα,β,γ,ν which is related to the operator⊕k iterated k times and defined by ⊕k=[(p

r=12/∂xr2)4−(

p+q

j=p+12/∂xj2)4]k, where p+q= nis the dimension of the space Rn of then-dimensional Eu-clidean space,x=(x1,x2,...,xn)∈Rn,kis a nonnegative integer, andα,β,γ, andνare complex parameters. It is found that the existence of the convolution Kα,β,γ,ν∗Kα,β,γ,νis depending on the conditions ofpandq.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 46F10, 46F12.

1. Introduction. The operator⊕kcan be factorized in the form

⊕k=     p

r=1 2 ∂x2 r   2   p+q

j=p+1 2 ∂x2 j   2   k ×  p

r=1 2 ∂x2

r +i p+q

j=p+1 2 ∂x2 j   kp

r=1 2 ∂x2

r−i p+q

j=p+1 2 ∂x2 j   k , (1.1)

wherep+q=nis the dimension of the spaceRn, i=1, andkis a

non-negative integer. The operator(pr=1∂2/∂x2r)2−( p+q

j=p+12/∂x2j)2is first

in-troduced by Kananthai [2] and named the Diamond operator denoted by

=  p

r=1 2 ∂x2r

  2

  p+q

j=p+1 2 ∂x2j

  2

. (1.2)

We denote the operatorsL1andL2by

L1= p

r=1 2 ∂xr2+i

p+q

j=p+1 2 ∂xj2

,

L2= p

r=1 2 ∂x2

r−i p+q

j=p+1 2 ∂x2

j .

(2)

Thus (1.1) can be written by

⊕k=kLk1Lk2. (1.4)

Now consider the convolutionRH

α(u)∗Rβe(v)∗Sγ(w)∗Tν(z)whereRαH(u), Rβe(v),Sγ(w), andTν(z)are defined by (2.2), (2.4), (2.6), and (2.7), respectively.

We defined the distributional kernelKα,β,γ,ν by

Kα,β,γ,ν=RH

α(u)∗Rβe(v)∗Sγ(w)∗Tν(z). (1.5)

Since the functionsRH

α(u),Reβ(v),Sγ(w), andTν(z)are all tempered

distribu-tions and the supports ofRH

α(u)andRβe(v)are compact (see [2, pages 30–31]

and [1, pages 152–153]), then the convolution on the right-hand side of (1.5) exists and also is a tempered distributions. ThusKα,β,γ,ν is well defined and also is a tempered distribution.

Forα=β=γ=ν=2k, we obtain(−1)kK2k,2k,2k,2kas an elementary solution

of the operator⊕k, see [3]. That isk(1)kK2k,2k,2k,2k(x)=δ whereδ is the

Dirac-delta distribution and⊕kis defined by (1.4).

2. Preliminaries

Definition2.1. Letx=(x1,x2,...,xn)∈Rnand write

x=x2

1+x22+···+xp2−xp2+1−x2p+2−···−x2p+q, p+q=n. (2.1)

Denote byΓ+= {x∈Rn:x1>0 andu >0}the interior of forward cone and Γ+denote its closure. For any complex numberα, we define the function

RH α(x)=

      

u(α−n)/2

Kn(α) , ifx∈Γ+,

0, ifx∉Γ+,

(2.2)

where the constantKn(α)is given by the formula

Kn(α)=π(n−1)/2Γ

(2+α−n)/(1−α)/(α)

Γ(2+α−p)/(p−α)/2 , (2.3)

the functionRH

α is first introduced by Nozaki [4, page 72] and is called the

ultra-hyperbolic kernel of Marcel Riesz. HenceRH

α(x)is an ordinary function

if Re(α)≥nand is a distribution ofαif Re(α) < n. Let suppRH

α(u)⊂Γ+where

suppRH

(3)

...

Definition2.2. Letx=(x1,x2,...,xn)∈Rnand writev=x2

1+x22+···+ x2

n.

For any complex numberβ, define the function

Reβ(v)=v (β−n)/2

Wn(β) , (2.4)

whereWn(β)=πn/22βΓ(β)/Γ((nβ)/2), the functionRe

β(v)is called the

el-liptic kernel of Marcel Riesz and is ordinary function if Re(β)≥nand is a distribution ofβif Re(β) < n.

Definition2.3. Letx=(x1,x2,...,xn)be a point of the spaceRn. Write

w=x2

1+x22+···+x2p−i

x2

p+1+xp2+2+···+xp+q

,

z=x2

1+x22+···+x2p+i

x2

p+1+xp2+2+···+xp+q, p+q=n, i=

1.

(2.5)

For any complex numbersγandν, define

Sγ(ω)=ω(γ−n)/2

Wn(γ) , (2.6)

Tν(z)=z(ν−n)/2

Wn(ν), (2.7)

where

Wn(γ)=πΓn/2 2γΓ(γ/2)

(n−γ)/2 , Wn(ν)=

πn/22νΓ(ν/2)

Γ(n−ν)/2 . (2.8)

Lemma2.4(the convolution product ofRβ(v)e ). The convolutionRβe∗Reβ= Re

β+β whereReβandRβare given by (2.2). Proof. See [5, page 20].

Lemma2.5(the convolution product ofRH

α(x)). The convolution product is given by

(i)

RHα∗RHα=cos

α(π/2)cosα(π/2)

cos(α+β)/2π ·R H

α+α, (2.9)

whereRH

(4)

(ii) RH

α∗RHα=RαH+α+Aα,αforpodd, where

Aα,α=2πi

4

C(−α−α)/2

C(−α/2)C(−α/2)

Hα++α−Hα−+α

,

C(r )=Γ(r )Γ(1−r ),

Hr±=Hr(x±i0,n)=e∓r (π/2)ie±q(π/2)ia

r

2

(u±i0)(r−n)/2,

a

r

2

=Γ

n−r

2

2rπn/2Γ

r

2

1 ,

(u±i0,n)λ=lim

0(u±i,n) λ,

(2.10)

u=u(x)is defined by (2.1) and|x| =(x12+x22+···+x2n)1/2in particu-larRH

α∗R−H2k=RHα−2kandRαH∗R2kH =RHα+2k.

The proof of this lemma is given by Téllez [6, pages 121–123].

Lemma2.6(the convolutions product ofSγ(w)and Tν(z)). The convolu-tions product is given by

(i) Sγ∗Sγ=(i)q/2+γ,

(ii) Tν∗Tν=(i)q/2+ν whereSγ andTν are defined by (2.6) and (2.7), respectively.

Proof. (i) Now

Sγ(w),ϕ(x)= 1 Wn(γ)

R

(γ−n)/2ϕ(x)dx, (2.11)

whereϕ∈Ᏸthe space of infinitely differentiable function with compact sup-ports. We haveω=x12+x22+···+x2p−i(xp2+1+xp2+2+···+x2p+q), p+q=n.

By changing the variablesx1=y1, x2=y2,...,xp=yp, xp+1=yp+1/√−i,

xp+2=yp+2/

−i,..., andxp+q=yp+q/√−i. Thus we obtainω=y12+y22+ ··· +y2

p+yp2+1+yp2+2+ ··· +yp2+q. Letr2=y12+y22+ ··· +yp2+q, p+q=n.

Thus (2.11) can be written in the form

Sγ(w),ϕ(x)= 1 Wn(γ)

Rnr γ−nϕ

x1,x2,...,xn

∂y1,y2,...,yndy1dy2···dyn

= 1

(−i)q/2

1

Wn(γ)

Rnr

γ−nϕ dy

= (i)q/2 Wn(γ)

rγ−n.

(2.12)

(5)

...

Consider the convolutionSγ∗Sγ. We have

Sγ∗Sγ=(i)q/2Rγ(w)e (i)q/2Reγ(w) =(i)qRe

γ+γ(w) byLemma 2.4and [1, pages 157–159] =(i)q/2(i)q/2Re

γ+γ(w) =(i)q/2

+γ.

(2.13)

Similarly, for (ii) we also have

Tν∗Tν=(i)q/2+ν. (2.14)

3. Main results

Theorem3.1. LetKα,β,γ,ν be the distributional kernel defined by (1.5). Then we obtain the following:

(i) Kα,β,γ,ν∗Kα=+α+β+γ+ν forα,β,γ,ν,α,β,γ, and ν positive even numbers withα=β=γ=ν,α=β=γ=ν;

(ii) Kα,β,γ,ν∗Kα=Bα,α·+α+β+γ+ν forpeven,α,β,γ,ν,α, β,γ, andνany complex numbers, andBα,α=cos(απ/2)cos(απ/2)/

cos((α+α)/2)π;

(iii) Kα,β,γ,ν∗Kα,β,γ,ν=+α,β+β,γ+γ,ν+ν+Aα,αReβ+β∗Sγ+γ∗+ν forpodd,α,β,γ,ν,α,β,γ, andνany complex numbersRe

β,Sγ, and Tνdefined by (2.4), (2.6), and (2.7), respectively. And

Aα,α=C

(−α−α)/2

C(−α/2) C

−α

2

·2πi

4

Hα++α−Hα−+α

,

C(r )=Γ(r )Γ(1−r ),

Hr±=Hr(u±i0,n)=e∓r (π/2)ie±q(π/2)ia

r

2

(u±i0)r−n/2,

a

r

2

=Γ

n−r

2

2rπn/2Γ

r

2

1 ,

(u±i0)λ=lim

0

u+i∈ |x|,

(3.1)

whereu=u(x)is defined by (2.1) and

|x| =x12+x22+···+xn2 1/2

. (3.2)

(6)

References

[1] W. F. Donoghue,Distributions and Fourier Transforms, Academic Press, New York, 1969.

[2] A. Kananthai,On the solutions of then-dimensional diamond operator, Appl. Math. Comput.88(1997), no. 1, 27–37.

[3] A. Kananthai, S. Suantai, and V. Longani,On the weak solutions of the equation related to the diamond operator, Vychisl. Tekhnol.5(2000), no. 5, 61–67. [4] Y. Nozaki,On Riemann-Liouville integral of ultra-hyperbolic type, K¯odai Math. Sem.

Rep.16(1964), 69–87.

[5] M. Riesz,L’intégrale de Riemann-Liouville et le problème de Cauchy, Acta Math.

81(1949), 1–223 (French).

[6] M. A. Téllez and S. E. Trione,The distributional convolution products of Marcel Riesz’ ultra-hyperbolic kernel, Rev. Un. Mat. Argentina39(1995), no. 3-4, 115–124.

A. Kananthai: Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand

E-mail address:[email protected]

S. Suantai: Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand

References

Related documents

Subject to any limit on the frequency of Distributions or to any minimum Distribution requirement identified in the Application or other notice given under the terms of this

Focusing on psychosocial health, based on the survey years 2001-2003, our study suggests that household income hardly affects the psychosocial health of children, whereas

BDL rats challenged with LPS had significantly higher concentrations (P &lt; 0.05) of IL-1 β (Figure 5A), TNF- α (Figure 5B) and IL-10 (Figure 5C) in their lungs compared with

While electricity is common problem in Nigerian, the situation is unbearable in the university system couple with negative attitudes of most members of the

The first area to evaluate in assessing the risk of a health care product is the potential severity of a counterfeit or illicit diversion incident.. Severity risks can come from

2. the introduction of a nominal limit on the size of the mortgage loan that qualifies for a tax deduction; 3. a reduction of the deductible rate. These proposals are