• No results found

Pulmonary function. Is patient potentially operable? Yes. tests 3. Yes. Pulmonary function. tests 3, if clinically indicated. Yes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Pulmonary function. Is patient potentially operable? Yes. tests 3. Yes. Pulmonary function. tests 3, if clinically indicated. Yes"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

NOTE: Consider clinical trials as treatment options for eligible patients.

intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. This algorithm should not be used to treat pregnant women.

Any test positive? ●Brain imaging

●Bone scan ●Bone marrow

aspiration and biopsy if LDH elevated or abnormal CBC

No

1 Limited disease: disease confined to the ipsilateral hemithorax within a single radiation port

2Extensive disease: disease beyond ipsilateral hemitorax or malignant pleural effudion or obvious metastatic disease 3 Pulmonary function tests include: spirometry pre-and-post-bronchodilators, xenon if clinically indicated,

Exercise oxygen consumption testing if clinically indicated

4Endobronchial ultrasound

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). Use total dose of: 25 Gy in 10 fractions

● Radiotherapy and steroids, then ● Platinum and etoposide for 6 cycles

Radiotherapy (45 Gy twice a day or 60-70 Gy daily or twice a day) concurrent with platinum and etoposide for 4 cycles

INITIAL EVALUATION

Pulmonary function tests3

STAGE

FURTHER WORKUP

TREATMENT

● Brain imaging ● Bone scan or plain

bone films if symptoms present that might require immediate radiotherapy Solitary pulmonary nodule without lymphade-nopathy? Is patient potentially operable? Are symptomatic brain metastases or cord compression present? No Yes No Inoperable

Platinum and etoposide for 6 cycles Surveillance (see page 2) Pulmonary function tests3, if clinically indicated Good performance status (Zubrod 0, 1 or 2)?

Platinum and etoposide For 4 cycles followed by Optional radiotherapy Adjuvant platinum and etoposide for 4 cycles Resection Limited Stage1 Extensive Stage 2

● Pathology consistent with small cell lung cancer ● History and physical

● Chest X-ray

● Laboratory studies to include:

hematological and full chemistry panels ● CT chest and upper abdomen

●Pet and MRI or CT of the brain

Yes Yes No Yes Operable Positive Lymph nodes and/or margins positive Negative Mediastinoscopy or EBUS4

Lymph nodes and margins negative

Yes

No

Department of Clinical Effectiveness V8 Approved by The Executive Committee of the Medical Staff on 03/31/2015

Department of Clinical Effectiveness V8 Approved by The Executive Committee of the Medical Staff on 03/31/2015

Partial or complete response? Consider: ●Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) of 25 Gy in 10 fractions, and ● Chest radiotherapy of 45 Gy in 15 fractions Yes No

(2)

NOTE: Consider clinical trials as treatment options for eligible patients.

intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. This algorithm should not be used to treat pregnant women.

Relapse?

Yes

SURVEILLANCE

SALVAGE / PALLIATION

History, physical, chest X-ray and scans of involved sites every 2 – 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly

Time of relapse?

Greater than 3 months from completion of

treatment

Continue surveillance No

● Reinduction therapy with platinum and etoposide ● Palliative symptom

management including localized radiotherapy

Less than or equal to 3 months from completion of treatment

● Salvage chemotherapy

(see principles of chemotherapy) ● Palliative symptom management

including localized radiotherapy

Department of Clinical Effectiveness V8 Approved by The Executive Committee of the Medical Staff on 03/31/2015

Department of Clinical Effectiveness V8 Approved by The Executive Committee of the Medical Staff on 03/31/2015

(3)

NOTE: Consider clinical trials as treatment options for eligible patients.

intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. This algorithm should not be used to treat pregnant women.

First-Line Chemotherapy

● Acceptable regimens for Limited Stage disease include:

●Cisplatin: 60 mg/m2 day 1 plus Etoposide: 120 mg/m2 days 1, 2, 3 every 21 days for 4 cycles; cycles 1 and 2 should be given concurrent with chest XRT.

● Carboplatin: AUC 6 day 1 plus Etoposide: 100 mg/m2 days 1, 2, 3 every 21 days for 4 cycles is an acceptable alternative regimen in patients unable to receive cisplatin; cycles 1 and 2 should be given concurrent with chest XRT.

●Acceptable regimens for Extensive Stage disease include:

●Cisplatin: 60 mg/m2 day 1 plus Etoposide: 100 mg/m2 days 1, 2, 3 every 21 days for 6 cycles ● Carboplatin: AUC 6 day 1 plus Etoposide: 100 mg/m2 days 1, 2, 3 every 21 days for 6 cycles ● Irinotecan: 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 plus Cisplatin: 60 mg/m2 on day 1, each cycle 28 days Second-Line Chemotherapy

●If relapse occurs greater than 3 months after completion of first-line therapy, re-treat with original regimen

●If relapse occurs less than 3 months after completion of first-line therapy, acceptable second-line chemotherapy option include topotecan, irinotecan, VAC (vincristine plus doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide) or oral etoposide

PRINCIPLES OF CHEMOTHERAPY

Department of Clinical Effectiveness V8 Approved by The Executive Committee of the Medical Staff on 03/31/2015

Department of Clinical Effectiveness V8 Approved by The Executive Committee of the Medical Staff on 03/31/2015

(4)

NOTE: Consider clinical trials as treatment options for eligible patients.

intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. This algorithm should not be used to treat pregnant women.

Radiotherapy For Limited Stage Disease

● Radiotherapy should be given 1.5 Gy bid (with at least 6 hours between fractions), to a total dose of 45 Gy. In circumstances where bid fractionation is not feasible, an acceptable alternate schedule is 1.8 – 2.0 Gy/day to a dose of 60 – 70 Gy.

● XRT should be administered concurrent with chemotherapy, ideally beginning during cycle 1 of chemotherapy.

● XRT should be delivered to original tumor volume unless there is marked risk of radiation pneumonitis; then decrease field as tumor shrinks. ● Appropriate schedule for prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) 25 Gy in 10 fractions.

● In patients receiving radiation therapy or chemoradiation with curative intent, treatment interruptions or dose reductions for temporary and manageable toxicities, such as

esophagitis and myelosuppression, should be avoided. Careful patient monitoring and aggressive supportive care are preferable to treatment breaks in potentially curable patients. Patients should be evaluated at least once per every 5 fractions to monitor weight changes and toxicity.

● 45 Gy in 30 Fractions over 3 weeks would not be recommended with concurrent chemotherapy on day 1, if the DVH shows V20 more than 35% of TL. If the GTV is too large to meet Dose Volume constraints, give one cycle of chemo or go daily fraction of radiation and cone down of the GTV after resimulation after 2-3 weeks treatment. This will apply for the patients who have FEV1 or DCLO less than 30% of predicted value.

● Elective nodal RT is not recommended.

PRINCIPLES OF RADIATION THERAPY

Department of Clinical Effectiveness V8 Approved by The Executive Committee of the Medical Staff on 03/31/2015

Department of Clinical Effectiveness V8 Approved by The Executive Committee of the Medical Staff on 03/31/2015

(5)

NOTE: Consider clinical trials as treatment options for eligible patients.

intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. This algorithm should not be used to treat pregnant women.

SUGGESTED READINGS

Auperin A, Arriagada R, Pignon JP et al. Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission. N Engl J Med 1999;341:476 – 484 (Editoral: Carney DN. Prophylactic cranial irradiation and small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:524 – 526).

Chute JP, Chen T, Feigal E, et al. Twenty years of phase III trials for patients with extensive small cell lung cancer: perceptible progress. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1794 – 1801. Komaki R, Swann RS, Ettinger DS, et al. Phase I study of thoracic radiation dose escalation with concurrent chemotherapy for patients with limited small-cell lung cancer:

Report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol 97-12. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:342-50.

Murray N, Coy P, Pater JL, et al: Importance of timing for thoracic irradiation in the combined modality treatment of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:336-44.

Pechoux CL, Dunant A, Senan S, Wolfson A, Quoix E, Finn CF, Ciuleanu T, Arriagada R, Jones R, Wanders R, Lerouge D, Laplanche, A. Standard-dose versus higher-dose prophylactic cranial. Lancet 2009;10:467-74, 4/2009.

Pignon JP, Arriagada R, Ihde DC, et al. A meta-analysis of thoracic radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 327:1618-1624.

Slotman B, Tinteren H, Praag J, Knegjens J, Sharouni S, Hatton M, Keijser A, Faivre-Finn C, Senan S. Use of thoracic radiotherapy for extensive state small-cell lung cancer: a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2014; 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61085-0.

Spira A and Ettinger DS. Multidisciplinary management of lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:379 – 392.

Tucker MA, Murray N, Shaw EG, et al. Second primary cancers related to smoking and treatment of small cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:1782 – 1788 (Editorial: Glisson BS, Hong WK. Survival after treatment of small cell lung cancer: an endless uphill battle. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:1745 – 1747).

Turrisi AT, Kim K, Blum R, et al. Twice daily compared with once daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer treated concurrently with cisplatin and etoposide. N Engl J Med 1999;340:265 – 271.

Department of Clinical Effectiveness V8 Approved by The Executive Committee of the Medical Staff on 03/31/2015

Department of Clinical Effectiveness V8 Approved by The Executive Committee of the Medical Staff on 03/31/2015

(6)

NOTE: Consider clinical trials as treatment options for eligible patients.

intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. This algorithm should not be used to treat pregnant women.

Department of Clinical Effectiveness V8 Approved by The Executive Committee of the Medical Staff on 03/31/2015

Department of Clinical Effectiveness V8 Approved by The Executive Committee of the Medical Staff on 03/31/2015 This practice guideline is based on majority expert opinion of the Thoracic Oncology Center Faculty at the University of Texas, M D Anderson Cancer Center.

It was developed using a multidisciplinary approach that included input from the following medical, radiation and surgical oncologists:

DEVELOPMENT CREDITS

Merrill S Kies, MD Ritsuko Komaki, M.D. Jonathan M Kurie, MD Zhongxing Liao, MD Charles Lu, MD, SM Reza Mehran, MD Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou, MD Makala B Pace, RPH Katherine M Pisters, MD Lauren A. Byers, MD George R Blumenschein, Jr, MD Joe Y Chang, MD, PhD Ŧ Frank V. Fossella, MDŦ Daniel Gomez, MD Bonnie S Glisson, MD John V Heymach, MD, PhD Wayne Hofstetter, MD Melenda Jeter, MD, MPH David Rice, MD Jack A Roth, MD Stephen Swisher, MD Anne Tsao, MD Ara Vaporciyan, MD Garrett Walsh, MD James Welsh, MD William N William Jr, MD

ŦCore Development Team

References

Related documents

• Minimum suction device up to 3 mm (for BEST ONE only) PERFORMANCE CURVES (according to ISO 9906 Attachment A).

Tamah & Lie (2019) developed an English proficiency test com- prising 16 general English, syllabus- oriented multiple choice items (31 for junior high school and 36

Based on Internal Audit assurance activities, Internal Audit through the Chief Audit Executive provides reasonable assurance to the Audit Committee, Board of Directors

Agreement between Ministry of Health, 57 Organizations (research hospitals and health institutes), and GARR. Ready to use IDM and IDP platform, hiding tech

Depending of the size of the width of the attraction zone compared to the standard deviation of the distribution of consumers’ location, we can observe convergence in the

Mobile advertising is a brand new (2003) defined mobile advertising as marketing and advertising activities that deliver advertisements to mobile devices using wireless

Formulations were prepared with the varying concentrations polymers ranging from F1-F12.Moisture content and Swelling study and all the results were found to be were found to be