Volume 49 Number 3 Article 4

Mercer Law Review Mercer Law Review

Volume 49 Number 3 Article 4

5-1998

The Process and the Product: A Bibliography of Scholarship The Process and the Product: A Bibliography of Scholarship About Legal Scholarship

About Legal Scholarship

Mary Beth Beazley Linda H. Edwards

Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr Part of the Legal Writing and Research Commons

Recommended Citation Recommended Citation

Beazley, Mary Beth and Edwards, Linda H. (1998) "The Process and the Product: A Bibliography of Scholarship About Legal Scholarship," Mercer Law Review: Vol. 49 : No. 3 , Article 4.

Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr/vol49/iss3/4

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Mercer Law School Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mercer Law Review by an authorized editor of Mercer Law School Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected].

Bibliography of Scholarship About Legal Scholarship

by Mary Beth Beazley

and

Linda H. Edwards"

This bibliography of scholarship about legal scholarship was originally prepared for the 1997 Conference of the Association of Legal Writing Directors.' The Conference explored the rapidly developing area of scholarship by legal writing professors² and the ways in which this important scholarship' can be encouraged. Characteristically, when writing teachers turn their attention to a particular kind of writing

* Director of Legal Writing, the Ohio State University College of Law. Bowling Green State University (B.A., 1979); Notre Dame Law School (J.D., 1983).

** Professor of Law and Director ofLegal Writing, Mercer University, Walter F. George School of Law. Florida State University (B.A., 1970); University of Tennessee (J.D., 1976).

1. The authors are grateful for the capable research assistance of Elizabeth Norman and for the able and cheerful secretarial support of Patricia Schirtzinger.

2. Until recent years, legal writing was taught primarily by students, adjunct faculty, doctrinal faculty paying their curricular dues, or recent law graduates in revolving-door positions. Lack of training, conflicting responsibilities elsewhere, or lack of interest precluded members of these groups from undertaking legal writing scholarship. Now, however, most legal writing teachers are professionals-outstanding law graduates who have significant legal practice experience and who have made a career commitment to the teaching of legal writing. The result has been a rapidly developing body of scholarship in the area of legal writing pedagogy and the beginning of a distinct legal writing voice in the exciting scholarly exploration of the theoretical underpinnings of legal discourse.

3. Like other scholars, legal writing professors explore the substance of their discipline by writing about it. Therefore, legal writing scholarship is important because the "product"

plays a fundamental role in defining both the discourse and the pedagogy through which that discourse can be taught. However, for legal writing professors, the "process" of producing scholarship carries a unique value. All scholars learn by writing, but writing teachers learn twice as much, because when we write, we are practicing the very process that we teach.

MERCER LAW REVIEW

project, they begin by examining both the genre and the creative activity the genre employs-that is, the process and the product. This bibliogra- phy is one result of that study. We hope that it will prove helpful to anyone interested in legal scholarship, especially to law faculty in the early stages of their scholarly careers.

Some may criticize this "meta-scholarship" as just so much pointless navel-gazing. However, serious examination of the genre of legal scholarship serves at least two important functions: it renders the scholarly life more accessible to newcomers to the academy, and it sustains a conversation that can identify and question assumptions that might otherwise hold the academy captive. If the academy is to remain open to new ideas, we must critically examine what makes scholarship valuable and how best to produce that valuable scholarship.

The product and the process of legal scholarship have spawned a large body of written comment. Consequently, we did not attempt an exhaustive list of sources. Rather, to keep the bibliography at a workable length, we selected sources that should be most useful to the largest number of readers. We did not include the many comments on the scholarship of particular doctrinal areas. However, we did include representative articles discussing the value of newly-emerging forms of scholarship. The implications of these new scholarly schools transcend doctrinal boundaries, potentially questioning the unstated and unexam- ined values preferenced in traditional doctrinal scholarship. Thus, these rapidly developing varieties of scholarship merit the attention of any serious legal scholar.

The first category identifies important text on the subject of scholarly writing. While it is written primarily for law students, it has much to offer to faculty scholars as well. The second category lists citations to relevant websites, while the third lists leading symposia on the subject of legal scholarship. Some articles included in a symposium are also listed individually under the appropriate subject category; however, space would not allow us to list all symposium articles separately.

Categories of individual articles follow the list of symposia. Many articles could reasonably be listed under several categories, but we have resisted the temptation to maximize the number of listings for each article. Instead, we listed most articles under only the most appropriate category so that each category would better direct a reader to articles that are most on point. A few articles were sufficiently relevant to several categories to justify multiple listings. In some cases, articles in response to other articles are listed both individually and as part of the listing for the article generating the response.

The first subject category, "How and Why To Do Scholarship," covers articles whose content is primarily practical, offering suggestions about

742 [Vol. 49

how to select a topic, carve out time for writing, solicit feedback, market the finished product, and develop a long-range plan for scholarship over the length of a career. Some of these articles also comment on the value of scholarship to the writers themselves.

The next category, "The Broader Value of Scholarship," identifies articles examining the value of scholarship to the substantive develop- ment of law, to law practice, and to law teaching. Many of these articles argue that legal scholarship serves an important function, while some dare to question the assumption that all law teachers should be encouraged to generate article after article for the duration of their careers. In the third subject category, "Comments on Scholarship in General," we list articles that comment on the genre of legal scholarship and on the nature of the enterprise itself. Many of these articles also criticize one or more aspects of current legal scholarship.

The fourth subject category contains articles primarily commenting on the development of emerging forms of scholarship, including interdisci- plinary scholarship, clinical scholarship, and empirical scholarship. This category also includes comments on those varieties of scholarship intimately related to particular political positions, such as feminist scholarship, the scholarship of race, critical legal studies, and law and economics.⁴

Finally, the last category lists articles that critique the publication process. The subjects of these articles range from the recurring complaints about the domination of student-run journals to the more recent explorations of the implications of electronic publishing.

BOOKS

ELIZABETH FAJANS & MARY R. FALK, SCHOLARLY WRITING FOR LAW STUDENTS (1995). Though written primarily for law students, this wonderful book can teach us all a great deal about how to undertake a scholarly writing project.

WEBSITE INFORMATION

Michael H. Hoffheimer, The 1998 On-Line Directory of Law Reviews and Scholarly Legal Periodicals <http://www.andersonpublishing.com>.

Wake Forest University Professional Center Library for Law &

Management <http://www.law.wsu.edu/library/copyright/> (a website

4. We include law and economics under this category because we view it as both a variety of interdisciplinary scholarship and a variety of scholarship intimately linked with a particular political perspective. While a reasoned argument can be made that law and economics is free of political affiliation, we are not persuaded.

MERCER LAW REVIEW

containing links to publishers' & journal copyright permission pages;

designed to facilitate contacting copyright holders for permission to use copyrighted materials, including scholarly writing and teaching materials).

SYMPOSIA ON LAW REVIEWS OR LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP

The citations below list symposia, projects, colloquia, and forums relevant to legal scholarship. Citations to articles from many of these issues are listed also in various other categories below. The citations are listed in reverse chronological order and alphabetically by title within each year. The page number listed is the first page of the introduction, if any, or of the first article in the symposium.

Symposium, The New Legal Writing Scholarship, 20 LEGAL STUD. F.

1 (1997).

Colloquy on United States Legal Scholarship, 81 IOWA L. REV. 1467 (1996).

Project, Law Schools and Legal Scholarship, 21 L. & SOC. INQUIRY 967 (1996).

Symposium on Trends and Citations in Legal Scholarship, 71 CHI.- KENT L. REV. 909 (1996).

Symposium on Writing Across the Margins, 53 WASH. & LEE L. REV.

943 (1996).

Special Issue, Law Review Conference, 47 STAN. L. REV. 1117 (1995).

Symposium on Law Review Editing: The Struggle Between Author and Editor over Control of the Text, 70 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 71 (1994).

Symposium, Legal Education, 91 MICH. L. REV. 1921 (1993) (Although the theme of this symposium is legal education generally, many of the authors are responding to Judge Harry Edwards's article The Growing Disjunction Between Legal Education and the Legal Profession, published at 91 MICH. L. REV. 34 (1992), and discuss the place of legal scholarship as part of that response).

744

[VoL 49

Symposium, Nova, Humor in the, Law Review, 17

L. REV. 664

Project, A Symposium on Legal Scholarship, 63 U. COLO. L. REv. 521

Project, Symposium on Race Consciousness and Legal Scholarship,

Symposium on Automation and the Changing Environment of Legal Scholarship, 83 L.

Colloquy, Currents in Clinical Scholarship, 35 N.Y.L.

L. REV. 1

Project, Legal Scholarship, 39

Colloquium on Legal Scholarship,

Project, Legal Scholarship in the Common Law World, 50 MOD. L.

REV. 677 (1987).

Project, Legal Scholarship,

Project, American Legal Scholarship: Directions and Dilemmas, 33 J.

LEGAL EDUC. 403 (1983).

Project, Legal Scholarship: Its Nature and Purposes: A Symposium,

ARTICLS

How and Why To Do Scholarship

Robert H. Abrams, Sing Muse: Legal Scholarship for New Law Teachers,

Dennis Archer, The Importance of Law Reviews to the Judiciary and

J.M. Balkin & Sanford Levinson, How To Win Cites and Influence People, 71 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 843 (1996).

MERCER LAW REVIEW

C. Steven Bradford, As I Lay Writing: How to Write Law Review Articles for Fun and Profit, 44 J. LEGAL EDUC. 13 (1994).

Jim Chen, Untenured But Unrepentant, 81 IOWA L. REV. 1609 (1996).

W. Lawrence Church, A Plea for Readable Law Review Articles, 1989 WIS. L. REV. 739.

Comment, Originality (Writing an Original Law Review Article), 6 CONST. COMMENT 1 (1989).

Richard Delgado, How to Write a Law Review Article, 20 U.S.F. L.

REV. 445 (1986).

Elizabeth Fajans & Mary R. Falk, Comments Worth Making:

Supervising Scholarly Writing in Law School, 46 J. LEGAL EDUC. 342 (1996) (Though written primarily for law teachers supervising student writing, this article is helpful to authors as well.).

Julius Getman, The Internal Scholarly Jury, 39 J. LEGAL EDuc. 337 (1989).

Erik M. Jensen, The Unwritten Article, 17 NOVA L. REV. 785 (1993) (humorous essay).

Mary Kay Kane, Some Thoughts on Scholarship for Beginning Teachers, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 14 (1987).

Arthur A. Leff, Afterward, 90 YALE L.J. 1296 (1981).

Jordan H. Leibman & James P. White, How the Student-Edited Law Journals Make Their Publication Decisions, 39 J. LEGAL EDUC. 387

(1989).

Leonard B. Mandell, Publish or Perish: Judging an Article by its Cover, 15 N. ILL. U. L. REV. 373 (1995).

Heather Meeker, Stalking the Golden Topic: A Guide to Locating and Selecting Topics for Legal Research Papers, 1996 UTAH L. REV. 917 (primarily for students, but helpful for faculty authors as well; includes representative pre-emption policies).

746 [Vol. 49

Gerald L. Neuman, Law Review Articles that Backfire, 21 U. MICH.

J.L. REFORM 697 (1988).

Gail Levin Richmond, Advice to the Untenured, 13 NovA L. REV. 79 (1988).

William G. Ross, Scholarly Legal Monographs: Advantages of the Road Less Taken, 30 AKRON L. REV. 259 (1996).

William R. Slomanson, Do's and Taboos With Law Reviews, 8 LEGAL REFERENCE SERV. Q. 225 (1988).

William R. Slomanson, The Bottom Line: Footnote Logic in Law Review Writing, 7 LEGAL REFERENCE SERV. Q. 47 (1987).

Aviam Soifer, MuSings, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 20 (1987).

Michael D. Stokes, How to Get Your Article Published by a Law Review, 71 A.B.A.J. 144 (Oct. 1985).

Geoffrey R. Stone, Controversial Scholarship and Faculty Appoint- ments: A Dean's View, 77 IOWA L. REV. 73 (1991).

Donald J. Weidner, A Dean's Letter to New Faculty about Scholarship, 44 J. LEGAL EDUC. 440 (1994).

James Boyd White, Why I Write, 53 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 1021 (1996).

Alfred C. Yen, Advice for the Beginning Legal Scholar, 38 LOY. L. REV.

95 (1992).

The Broader Value of Scholarship

Arthur Austin, The Reliability of Citation Counts in Judgments on Promotion, Tenure, and Status, 35 ARIZ. L. REV. 829 (1993).

Larry Cata Backer, Pitted But Not Entitled: The Normative Limita- tions of Scholarship Advocating Change, 19 W. NEW ENG. L. REV. 59 (1997).

Robert L. Bard, Legal Scholarship and the Professional Responsibility of Law Professors, 16 CONN. L. REV. 731 (1984) (faculty symposium).

MERCER LAW REVIEW

David R. Barnhizer, Prophets, Priests, and Power Blockers: Three Fundamental Roles of Judges and Legal Scholars in America, 50 U.

PIrr. L. REV. 127 (1988).

Jane B. Baron, Self-Criticism (Reflection on Being a Legal Professor, Tenure, Legal Scholarship, and Critical Legal Studies), 60 TEMP. L.Q. 39 (1987).

Jack M. Beermann & Ronald A. Cass, Throwing Stones at the Mudbank: The Impact of Scholarship on Administrative Law, 45 ADMIN.

L. REv. 1 (1993).

Derrick Bell & Erin Edmonds, Students as Teachers, Teachers as Learners, 91 MICH. L. REV. 2025 (1993).

Ronald Benton Brown, The Cure for Scholarship Schizophrenia: A Manifesto for Sane Productivity and Productive Sanity, 13 NOVA L. REV.

39 (1988).

Clark Byse, Legal Scholarship, Legal Realism, and the Law Teacher's Intellectual Schizophrenia, 13 NOVA L. REV. 9 (1988).

Stephen L. Carter, Academic Tenure and "White Male" Standards:

Some Lessons From the Patent Law, 100 YALE L.J. 2065 (1991).

Gilbert Paul Carrasco, Effecting Social Change Through Legal Scholarship, 10 ST. Louis U. PUB. L. REV. 161 (1991).

Anthony Chase, The Legal Scholar as Producer, 13 NOVA L. REV. 57 (1988).

Roger C. Cramton, Demystifying Legal Scholarship, 75 GEO. L.J. 1 (1986).

Harry T. Edwards, The Growing Disjunction Between Legal Education and the Legal Profession, 91 MICH. L. REV. 34 (1992).

Donald B. Ayer, Stewardship, 91 MICH. L. REV. 2150 (1993).

Lee C. Bollinger, The Mind in the Major American Law School, 91 MICH. L. REV. 2167 (1993).

(Vol. 49 748

Harry T. Edwards, The Growing Disjunction Between Legal Education and the Legal Profession: A Postscript, 91 MICH. L. REV.

2191 (1993).

Robert W. Gordon, Lawyers, Scholars, and the "Middle Ground," 91 MICH. L. REV. 2075 (1993).

Sanford Levinson, Judge Edwards' Indictment of "Impractical"

Scholars: The Need For a Bill of Particulars, 91 MICH. L. REV. 2010 (1993).

Louis H. Pollak, The Disjunction Between Judge Edwards and Professor Priest, 91 MICH. L. REV. 2113 (1993).

Richard A. Posner, The Deprofessionalization of Legal Teaching and Scholarship, 91 MICH. L. REV. 1921 (1993).

George L. Priest, The Growth of Interdisciplinary Research and the Industrial Structure of the Production of Legal Ideas: A Reply to Judge Edwards, 91 MICH. L. REV. 1929 (1993).

Paul D. Reingold, Harry Edwards'Nostalgia, 91 MICH. L. REV.

1998 (1993).

Pierre Schlag, Clerks in the Maze, 91 MICH. L. REV. 2053 (1993).

James J. White, Letter to Judge Harry Edwards, 91 MICH. L.

REV. 2177 (1993).

John S. Elson, The Case Against Legal Scholarship or, If the Professor Must Publish, Must the Profession Perish?, 39 J. LEGAL EDUC. 343 (1989).

E. Allan Farnsworth, Casebooks and Scholarship: Confessions of an American Opinion Clipper, 42 SW. L.J. 903 (1988).

John Gava, Scholarship and Community, 16 SYDNEY L. REV. 443 (1994).

Robert M. Hayden, Social Theory and Legal Practice: Intuition, Discourse, and Legal Scholarship, 83 Nw. U. L. REV. 461 (1988).

750 MERCER LAW REVIEW [Vol. 49 Graham Hughes, The Great American Legal Scholarship Bazaar, 33 J. LEGAL EDUC. 424 (1983).

Robert M. Jarvis, Why Law Professors Should Not Be Hessian- Trainers, 13 NOVA L. REV. 69 (1988).

Peter A. Joy, Clinical Scholarship: Improving the Practice of Law, 2 CLINICAL L. REV. 385 (1996).

Philip C. Kissam, The Evaluation of Legal Scholarship, 63 WASH. L.

REV. 221 (1988).

Anthony T. Kronman, Foreword: Legal Scholarship and Moral Education, 90 YALE L.J. 955 (1981).

Charles R. Lawrence III, The Word and the River: Pedagogy as Scholarship as Struggle, 65 S. CAL. L. REV. 2231 (1992).

Peter McCormick, Judges, Journals and Exegesis: Judicial Leadership and Academic Scholarship, 45 U.N.B. L.J. 139 (1996).

Frank I. Michelman, Reflections on Professional Education, Legal Scholarship, and the Law-and-Economics Movement, 33 J. LEGAL EDUC.

197 (1983).

Marla L. Mitchell, Beyond a Book Review: Using Clinical Scholarship in our Teaching, 2 CLINICAL L. REV. 251 (1995).

Debbie Papay-Carder, Plagiarism in Legal Scholarship, 15 U. TOL. L.

REV. 233 (1983).

Graham Parker, Legal Scholarship and Legal Education, 23 OSGOODE HALL L.J. 653 (1985).

Donald J. Polden, Scholarship and Legal Education, 24 MEM. ST. U.

L. REV. 1 (1993).

Richard A. Posner, The Deprofessionalization of Legal Teaching and Scholarship, 91 MICH. L. REV. 1921 (1993) (Symposium: Legal Education).

Robert Post, Lani Guinier, Joseph Biden, and the Vocation of Legal Scholarship, 11 CONST. COMMENT 185 (1994).

Robert C. Post, Legal Scholarship and the Practice of Law, 63 U.

COLO. L. REV. 615 (1992).

Marc Rohr, A Law School for the Consumer, 13 NOVA L. REV. 101 (1988).

Edward L. Rubin, On Beyond Truth: A Theory for Evaluating Legal Scholarship, 80 CAL. L. REV. 889 (1992).

Elizabeth M. Schneider, Building Bridges Between Theory and Practice, Scholarship and Activism, 40 CLEV. ST. L. REV. 493 (1992).

Ted Schneyer, Legal Process Scholarship and the Regulation of Lawyers, 65 FORDHAM L. REV. 33 (1996).

Louis J. Sirico, Jr. & Beth A. Drew, The Citing of Law Reviews by the United States Courts of Appeals: An Empirical Analysis, 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 1051 (1991).

Louis J. Sirico, Jr. & Jeffrey B. Margulies, The Citing of Law Reviews by the Supreme Court: An Empirical Study, 34 UCLA L. REV. 131 (1985).

Robert Stevens, American Legal Scholarship: Structural Constraints and Intellectual Conceptualism, 33 J. LEGAL EDUC. 442 (1983).

Geoffrey R. Stone, Controversial Scholarship and Faculty Appoint- ments: A Dean's View, 77 IOWA L. REV. 73 (1991).

Rennard Strickland, Scholarship in the Academic Circus or the Balancing Act at the Minority Side Show, 20 U.S.F. L. REV. 491 (1986).

Colin C. Tait, Scholarship and Service to the Legal Community: Doing as Well as Teaching, 28 CONN. L. REV. 287 (1996).

Robert P. Wasson, Jr., Split Personalities: Teaching and Scholarship in Non-Stereotypical Areas of the Law, 19 W. NEW ENG. L. REV. 102 (1997).

James Boyd White, Why I Write, 53 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 1021 (1996).

James Boyd White, Law Teachers' Writing, 91 MICH. L. REV. 1970 (1993).

752

MERCER LAW REVIEW ' [Vol. 49

Roger I. Abrams, This is Not an Article, Or Scholarship: The Greek Salad, 13 NOvA L. REV. 33 (1988).

Bruce Ackerman, The Marketplace of Ideas, 90 YALE L.J. 1131 (1981).

Francis A. Allen, Legal Scholarship: Present Status and Future Prospects, 33 J. LEGAL EDUC. 403 (1983).

David A. Anderson, Metaphorical Scholarship, 79 CAL. L. REV. 1205 (1991) (book review).

Arthur Austin, The Reliability of Citation Counts in Judgments on Promotion, Tenure, and Status, 35 ARIZ. L. REV. 829 (1993).

Arthur D. Austin, Footnotes as Product Differentiation, 40 VAND. L.

REV. 1131 (1987).

Arthur D. Austin, Footnote Skullduggery and Other Bad Habits, 44 U.

MIAMI L. REV. 1009 (1990).

J.M. Balkin & Sanford Levinson, How To Win Cites and Influence People, 71 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 843 (1996).

Paul Brest, Plus Qa Change, 91 MICH. L. REV. 1945 (1993).

Ronald Benton Brown; The Cure for Scholarship Schizophrenia: A Manifesto for Sane Productivity and Productive Sanity, 13 NOVA L. REV.

39 (1988).

Book Review: Citizenship and Scholarship, 90 COLUM. L. REV. 2017 (1990) (reviewing ROBERT H. BORK, THE TEMPTING OF AMERICA: THE POLITICAL SEDUCTION OF THE LAw and ETHAN BRONNER, BATTLE FOR JUSTICE: How THE BORK NOMINATION SHOOK AMERICA).

David P. Bryden, Scholarship about Scholarship, 63 U. COLO. L. REV.

641 (1992).

Clark Byse, Legal Scholarship, Legal Realism, and the Law Teacher's Intellectual Schizophrenia, 13 NOVA L. REV. 9 (1988).

Paul F. Campos, Advocacy and Scholarship, '81 CAL. L. REV. 817 (1993).

Lief H. Carter, Fantasy and the Language of Legal Scholarship, 21 GA.

L. REV. 273 (1986).

David S. Caudill, On the Naming of Paranoia in Legal Scholarship, 33

Hous. L. REV. 215 (1996).

Anthony Chase, The Legal Scholar as Producer, 13 NOVA L. REV. 57 (1988).

Michael Chesterman & David Weisbrot, Legal Scholarship in

W. Lawrence Church, A Plea for Readable Law Review Articles, 1989

Wis. L. REV. 739.

Robert C. Clark, The Interdisciplinary Study of Legal Evolution, 90 YALE L.J. 1238 (1981).

Roger

Cramton,

Meir Dan-Cohen, Listeners and Eavesdroppers: Substantive Legal Theory and its Audience, 63 U. COLO. L. REV. 569 (1992).

Edward L. Rubin, What Does Prescriptive Legal Scholarship Say and Who Is Listening to it: A Response to Professor Dan-Cohen, 63 U. COLO. L. REV. 731 (1992).

John P. Dawson,

Rebecca S. Eisenberg, The Scholar as Advocate, 43 J. LEGAL EDUC. 391 (1993).

John R. Kramer, Comment on Rebecca Eisenberg's "The Scholar as Advocate," 43 J. LEGAL EDUC. 401 (1993).

Robert Pitofsky, Comment on Rebecca Eisenberg's "The Scholar as Advocate," 43 J. LEGAL EDUC. 412 (1993).

754 MERCER LAW REVIEW [Vol. 49

Ordinary Scholarship,

L.J.

John S. Elson, The Case Against Legal Scholarship or, If the Professor Must Publish, Must the Profession Perish?,

(1989).

Anthony J. Fejfar, Legal Education and Legal Scholarship: From Rationalist Discourse to Dialogical Encounter, 20 CAP. U. L. REV. 97

David Feldman, The Nature of Legal Scholarship, 52 MOD. L. REV. 498 (1989).

Owen M. Fiss,

The Varieties of Positivism,

George P. Fletcher, Two Modes of Legal Thought, 90 YALE L.J. 970 (1981).

Alan D. Freeman, Truth and Mystification in Legal Scholarship, 90

Barry Friedman, The Turn to History, 72 N.Y.U. L. REV. 928 (1997).

Julius Getman,

The Internal Scholarly Jury,

Donald H. Gjerdingen, The Future of Legal Scholarship and the Search

John Goldring, Babies and Bathwater: Tradition or Progress in Legal

Robert W. Gordon,

Historicism in Legal Scholarship,

1017 (1981).

David L. Gregory, IN THE COMPANY OF SCHOLARS: THE STRUGGLE FOR

THE SOUL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, Edited by Julius Getman, University of Texas Press, 1992, 39 LoY. L. REV. 921 (1994) (book review).

David L. Gregory,

The Assault on Scholarship,

REV. 993 (1991) (essay).

Robert M. Hayden, Social Theory and Legal Practice: Intuition, Discourse, and Legal Scholarship, 83 NW. U. L. REV. 461 (1989).

James L. Hoover, Legal Scholarship and the Electronic Revolution, 83

L. LIBR. J. 643 (1991).

Morton J. Horwitz, The Historical Contingency of the Role of History, 90 YALE L.J. 1057 (1981).

Robert M. Jarvis, Why Law Professors Should Not Be Hessian- Trainers, 13 NOVA L. REV. 69 (1988).'

Erik M. Jensen, Tough on Scholarship, 39 WAYNE L. REV. 1285 (1993) (essay).

Alex M. Johnson, Jr., Scholarly Paradigms: A New Tradition Based on Context and Color, 16 VT. L. REV. 913 (1992).

Laura Kalman, Border Patrol: Reflections on the Turn to History in Legal Scholarship, 66 FORDHAM L. REV. 87 (1997).

Judith S. Kaye, One Judge's View of Academic Law Review Writing, 39 J. LEGAL EDUC. 313 (1989).

/

Mark Kelman, The Past and Future of Legal Scholarship, 33 J. LEGAL EDUC. 432 (1983).

David W. Kennedy, Critical Theory, Structuralism and Contemporary Legal Scholarship, 21 NEW ENG. L. REV. 209 (1986).

Duncan Kennedy, Cost-Reduction Theory as Legitimation, 90 YALE L.J.

1275 (1981).

Philip C. Kissam, The Evaluation of Legal Scholarship, 63 WASH. L.

REV. 221 (1988).

Anthony T. Kronman, Foreword: Legal Scholarship and Moral Education, 90 YALE L.J. 955 (1981).

Kenneth Lasson, Scholarship Amok: Excesses in the Pursuit of Truth and Tenure, 103 HARV. L. REV. 926 (1990).

756 MERCER LAW REVIEW

[Vol.

Nancy Levit, Defining Cutting Edge Scholarship: Feminism and Criteria of Rationality, 71 CHI.-KENT L. REv. 947 (1996).

Harold S. Lewis, Jr., Integrity in Research, 42 J. LEGAL EDUC. 607 (1992).

James Lindgren & Daniel Seltzer, The Most Prolific Law Professors and Faculties, 71 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 781 (1996).

Jonathan R. Macey, Takeover Defense Tactics and Legal Scholarship:

Market Forces Versus the Policymaker's Dilemma, 96 YALE L.J. 342 (1986).

Earl M. Maltz, Critical Theory, Neutral Principles, and the Future of Legal Scholarship, 43 FLA. L. REV. 445 (1991).

Peter W. Martin, How New Information Technologies Will Change the Way Law Professors Do and Distribute Scholarship, 83 L. LIBR. J. 633 (1991).

Banks McDowell, The Audiences for Legal Scholarship, 40 J. LEGAL EDUC. 261 (1990).

Deborah Jones Merritt & Melanie Putnam, Judges and Scholars: Do Courts and Scholarly Journals Cite the Same Law Review Articles?, 71 CHI.-KENT L. REv. 871 (1996).

Frank I. Michelman, Politics As Medicine: On Misdiagnosing Legal Scholarship, 90 YALE L.J. 1224 (1981).

Gary Minda, One Hundred Years of Modern Legal Thought: From Langdell and Holmes to Posner and Schlag, 28 IND. L. REV. 353 (1995).

Francis J. Mootz III, The Paranoid Style in Contemporary Legal

Scholarship, 31 HOUS. L. REV. 873 (1994) (essay).

Frances Olsen, Affirmative Action: Necessary But Not Sufficient, 71 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 937 (1996).

Ellen A. Peters, Reality and the Language of Lau), 90 YALE L.J. 1193 (1981).

Richard A. Posner, Legal Scholarship Today, 45 STAN. L. REv. 1647 (1993).

Richard A. Posner, The Present Situation in Legal Scholarship, 90 YALE L.J. 1113 (1981).

L.A. Powe, Jr., The Supreme Court, Social Change, and Legal Scholarship, 44 STAN. L. REv. 1615 (1992) (reviewing LEE C. BOLLINGER, IMAGES OF A FREE PRESS and GERALD N. ROSENBERG, THE HOLLOW HOPE: CAN COURTS BRING ABOUT SOCIAL CHANGE).

George L. Priest, Triumphs or Failings of Modern Legal Scholarship and the Conditions of Its Production, 63 U. COLO. L. REV. 725 (1992).

George L. Priest, The New Scientism in Legal -Scholarship: A Comment on Clark and Posner, 90 YALE L.J. 1284 (1981).

Marc Rohr, A Law School for the Consumer, 13 NOVA L. REV. 101 (1988).

Edward L. Rubin, Public Choice and Legal Scholarship, 46 J. LEGAL EDUC. 490 (1996).

Edward L. Rubin, The Concept of Law and the New Public Law Scholarship, 89 MICH. L. REv. 792 (1991).

Edward L. Rubin, The Practice and Discourse of Legal Scholarship, 86 MICH. L. REV. 1835 (1988).

Michael J. Saks, Howard Larsen & Carol J. Hodne, Is There a Growing Gap Among Law, Law Practice, and Legal Scholarship?: A Systematic Comparison of Law Review Articles One Generation Apart, 30 SUFFOLK U. L. REV. 353 (1996).

Frederick Schauer, The Authority of Legal Scholarship (The Critique of Normativity), 139 U. PA. L. REV. 1003 (1991).

Marin Roger Scordato, The Dualist Model of Legal Teaching and Scholarship, 40 AM. U. L. REV. 367 (1990).

MERCER LAW REVIEW

Marrin Roger Scordato, Legal Theory and Linguistic Reality: A Critical Examination of Modern Legal Scholarship, 2 J. CONTEMP. LEGAL ISSUES 257 (1989).

Eric J. Segall, Doctrinal Legal Scholarship and Religious Liberty: A Review of Jesse Choper's SECURING RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, 5 GEo. MASON L. REV. 71 (1996) (book review).

Fred R. Shapiro, The Most-Cited Law Review Articles Revisited, 71 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 751 (1996).

Response, William M. Landes & Richard A. Posner, Heavily Cited Articles in Law, 71 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 825 (1996).

Reply, Fred R. Shapiro, Response to Landes and Posner, 71 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 841 (1996).

Martin Shapiro, On the Regrettable Decline of Law French: Or Shapiro Jettet Le Brickbat, 90 YALE L.J. 1198 (1981).

Steven D. Smith, In Defense of Traditional Legal Scholarship: A Comment on Schlegel, Weisberg, and Dan-Cohen, 63 U. COLO. L. REV.

627 (1992).

Robert Stevens, American Legal Scholarship: Structural Constraints and Intellectual Conceptualism, 33 J. LEGAL EDUC. 442 (1983).

Rennard Strickland, Scholarship in the Academic Circus or the Balancing Act at the Minority Side Show, 20 U.S.F. L. REV. 491 (1986).

Christopher D. Stone, From a Language Perspective, 90 YALE L.J. 1149 (1981).

Dennis J. Turner, Publish or Be Damned, 31 J. LEGAL EDUC. 550 (1982).

Mark V. Tushnet, Legal Scholarship in the United States: An Overview, 50 MOD. L. REV. 804 (1987).

Mark V. Tushnet, Legal Scholarship: Its Causes and Cure, 90 YALE L.J. 1205 (1981).

Barbara D. Underwood, Against Dichotomy, 90 YALE L.J. 1004 (1981).

758 [Vol. 49

Allan W. Vestal, Former Client Censorship of Academic Scholarship, 43 SYRACUSE L. REV. 1247 (1992).

Stephen J. Werber, On Defining Academic Scholarship, 40 CLEV. ST.

L. REV. 209 (1992).

James J. White, Scholarly Books: What, To Whom and Why, 81 MICH.

L. REV. 723 (1983).

Bill L. Williamson, Using Students: The Ethics of Faculty Use of a Student's Work Product, 26 ARIZ. ST. L.J. 1029 (1994).

Geoffrey Wilson, English Legal Scholarship, 50 MOD. L. REV. 818 (1987).

Nicholas Wolfson, Efficient Markets, Hubris, Chaos, Legal Scholarship and Takeovers, 63 ST. JOHN'S L. REV. 511 (1989).

Charles Alan Wright, How Many Catz Can Stand on the Head of a Pin, or Andrew Lloyd Webber, Where Are You Now That We Need You?,

13 NOVA L. REV. 1 (1988).

Comments on Emerging Forms of Scholarship

Kathryn Abrams, Hearing the Call of Stories, 79 CAL. L. REV. 971 (1991).

Keith Aoki, The Scholarship of Reconstruction and the Politics of Backlash, 81 IowA L. REV. 1467 (1996).

Arthur Austin, Race & Gender Exclusivity in Legal Scholarship, 4 U.

Cm. L. SCH. ROUNDTABLE 71 (1997).

Arthur Austin, Essay, Deconstructing Voice Scholarship, 30 Hous. L.

REV. 1671 (1993).

Arthur Austin, Evaluating Storytelling as a 7ype of Nontraditional Scholarship, 74 NEB. L. REV. 479 (1995).

Arthur

REV. 929 (1991).

760 MERCER LAW REVIEW [Vol. 49 J.M. Balkin, Interdisciplinarity as Colonization, 53 WASH. & LEE L.

REV. 949 (1996).

Milner S. Ball, The Legal Academy and Minority Scholars, 103 HARV.

L. REV. 1855 (1990) (responses to Randall Kennedy, Racial Critiques of Legal Academia, 102 HARV. L. REV. 1745 (1989)).

Leonard M. Baynes, Who Is Black Enough For You: The Stories of One Black Man and His Family's Pursuit of the American Dream, 11 GEO.

IMMIGR. L.J. 97 (1996).

Paul F. Campos, Advocacy and Scholarship, 81 CAL. L. REV. 817 (1993).

Robert S. Chang, Passion and the Asian American Legal Scholar, 3 ASIAN L.J. 105 (1996).

Robert S. Chang, Toward an Asian American Legal Scholarship:

Critical Race Theory, Post-Structuralism, and Narrative Space, 1 ASIAN L.J. 1 (1994).

Robert S. Chang, Toward an Asian American Legal Scholarship:

Critical Race Theory, Post-Structuralism, and Narrative Space, 81 CAL.

L. REV. 1241 (1993).

Anthony S. Chen, Beyond Modernism and Postmodernism: Working Notes Towards an Asian American Legal Scholarship, 4 ASIAN L.J. 97 (1997).

Jim Chen, Unloving, 80 IOWA L. REV. 145 (1994).

Margaret Chon, Chon on Chen on Chang, 81 IOWA L. REV. 1535 (1996).

Margaret Chon, On the Need for Asian American Narratives in Law:

Ethnic Specimens, Native Informants, Storytelling and Silences, 3 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 4 (1995).

Robert C. Clark, The Interdisciplinary Study of Legal Evolution, 90 YALE L.J. 1238 (1981).

Lloyd Cohen, A Different Black Voice in Legal Scholarship, 37 N.Y.L.

SCH. L. REV. 301 (1992).

Charles W. Collier, Interdisciplinary Legal Scholarship in Search of a Paradigm, 42 DUKE L.J. 840 (1993).

Ronald K L. Collins & David M. Skover, The Future of Liberal Legal Scholarship, 87 MIcH. L. REv. 189 (1988).

Mary I. Coombs, Outsider Scholarship: The Law Review Stories, 63 U. COLO. L. REV. 683 (1992).

Robert J. Cottrol, Legal Scholarship and Interdisciplinary Inquiry: A Compelling Combination for Minority Scholars, 38 LOY. L. REV. 83 (1992).

Nancy L. Cook, Outside the Tradition: Literature as Legal Scholar- ship, 63 U. CIN. L. REv. 95 (1994).

Ann M. Coughlin, Regulating the Self: Autobiographical Performances in Outsider Scholarship, 81 VA. L. REV. 1229 (1995).

Carlos Cuevas, Split Personalities: Teaching and Scholarship in Nonstereotypical Areas of the Law, 19 W. NEW ENG. L. REV. 73 (1997)

(panel).

Jerome McCristal Culp, Jr., Toward a Black Legal Scholarship: Race and Original Understandings, 1991 DUKE L.J. 39.

Jerome McCristal Culp, Jr., You Can Take Them to Water But You Can't Make Them Drink: Black Legal Scholarship and White Legal Scholars, 1992 U. ILL. L. REV. 1021.

Jerome McCristal Culp, Jr.,Autobiography and Legal Scholarship and Teaching: Finding the Me in the Legal Academy, 77 VA. L. REV. 539 (1991).

Richard Delgado, The Ethereal Scholar: Does Critical Legal Studies Have What Minorities Want?, 22 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 301 (1987).

Richard Delgado, When a Story is Just a Story: Does Voice Really Matter?, 76 VA. L. REV. 95 (1990).

Richard Delgado, Rodrigo's Fifteenth Chronicle: Racial Mixture, Latino-Critical Scholarship, and the Black-White Binary, 75 TEX. L. REv.

MERCER LAW REVIEW

1181 (1997) (reviewing LOUISE ANN FISCH, ALL RISE: REYNALDO G.

GARZA, THE FIRST MEXICAN AMERICAN FEDERAL JUDGE).

Richard Delgado, The Colonial Scholar: Do OutsiderAuthors Replicate the Citation Practices of The Insiders, But in Reverse?, 71 CHI.-KENT L.

REV. 969 (1996).

Richard Delgado, Coughlin's Complaint: How to Disparage Outsider Writing, One Year Later, 82 VA. L. REV. 95 (1996).

Richard Delgado, The Imperial Scholar Revisited: How to Marginalize Outsider Writing, Ten Years Later, 140 U. PA. L. REV. 1349 (1992).

Richard Delgado, Legal Scholarship: Insiders, Outsiders, Editors, 63 U. COLO. L. REV. 717 (1992).

Richard Delgado, The Imperial Scholar: Reflections on a Review of Civil Rights Literature, 132 U. PA. L. REV. 561 (1984).

Garrett Epps, What's 'Loving' Got To Do With It?, 81 IOWA L. REV.

1489 (1996).

William N. Eskridge, Jr., Outsider-Insiders: The Academy of the Closet, 71 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 977 (1996).

Stephen Shie-Wei Fan, Immigration Law and the Promise of Critical Race Theory: Opening the Academy to the Voices of Aliens and Immi- grants, 97 COLuM. L. REV. 1202 (1997).

Martha L. Fineman, Challenging Law, Establishing Differences: The Future of Feminist Legal Scholarship (Women and the Law: Goals for the 1990's), 42 FLA. L. REV. 25 (1990).

E. Nathaniel Gates, Bondage, Freedom & The Constitution: The New Slavery Scholarship and Its Impact on Law and Legal Historiography,

17 CARDOZO L. REV. 1685 (1996).

Paul M. George & Susan McGlamery, Women and Legal Scholarship:

A Bibliography, 77 IOWA L. REV. 87 (1991).

Mary Ann Glendon, Why Cross Boundaries?, 53 WASH. & LEE L. REV.

971 (1996).

762 [Vol. 49

Neil Gotanda, Chen the Chosen: Reflections on 'Unloving,' 81 IowA L.

REV. 1585 (1996).

Phoebe A. Haddon, Keynote Address: Redefining Our Roles in the Battle for Inclusion of People of Color in Legal Education, 31 NEw ENG.

L. REV. 709 (1997).

Peter Halewood, White Men Can't Jump: Critical Epistemologies, Embodiment, and the Praxis of Legal Scholarship, 7 YALE J.L. &

FEMINISM 1 (1995).

Berta Esperanza Hernandez-Truyol, Borders (En)Gendered: Normativ- ities, Latinas, and a LatCrit Paradigm, 72 N.Y.U. L. REV. 882 (1997).

Allan C. Hutchinson & Patrick J. Monahan, Law, Politics, and the Critical Legal Scholars: The Unfolding Drama of American Legal Thought, 36 STAN. L. REV. 199 (1984).

Elizabeth M. Iglesias, International Law, Human Rights, and LatCrit Theory, 28 U. MIAMI INTER-AM. L. REV. 177 (1997).

Natsu Saito Jenga, Unconscious: The "Just Say No" Response to Racism, 81 IOWA L. REV. 1503 (1996).

Natsu Saito Jenga, Finding Our Voices, Teaching Our Truth:

Reflections on Legal Pedagogy and Asian American Identity, 3 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 81 (1995).

Alex M. Johnson, Jr., Defending the Use of Narrative and Giving Content to the Voice of Color: Rejecting the Imposition of Process Theory in Legal Scholarship, 79 IOWA L. REV. 803 (1994).

Peter A. Joy, Clinical Scholarship: Improving the Practice of Law, 2 CLINICAL L. REV. 385 (1996).

Frederic R. Kellogg, Legal Scholarship in the Temple of Doom:

Pragmatism's Response to Critical Legal Studies, 65 TUL. L. REV. 15 (1990).

Duncan Kennedy, Cost-Reduction Theory as Legitimation, 90 YALE L.J.

1275 (1981).

Peter Kwan, Unconvincing, 81 IOWA L. REV. 1557 (1996).

MERCER LAW REVIEW

L.H. LaRue, Writing Across the Margins: An Introduction, 53 WASH.

& LEE L. REV. 943 (1996).

Nancy Levit, Defining Cutting Edge Scholarship: Feminism and Criteria of Rationality, 71 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 947 (1996).

Douglas E. Litowitz, Some Critical Thoughts on Critical Race Theory, 72 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 503 (1997).

Earl M. Maltz, Critical Theory, Neutral Principles, and the Future of Legal Scholarship, 43 FLA. L. REV. 445 (1991).

Scott M. Martin, The Law Review Citadel: Rodell Revisited, 71 IOWA L. REV. 1093 (1986).

Frank I. Michelman, Reflections on Professional Education, Legal Scholarship, and the Law-and-Economics Movement, 33 J. LEGAL EDUc.

197 (1983) (The Place of Economics in Legal Education: October 28-30, 1982).

Margaret E. Montoya, Mascaras, Thenzas, Y Grednas: Un/Masking The Self While Un/Braiding Latina Stories and Legal Discourse, 15 CHICANO-LATINO L. REV. 1 (1994), 17 HARV. WOMEN'S L.J. 185 (1994).

Beverly Moran, From Urinal to Manicure: Challenges to the Scholar- ship of Tax and Gender, 11 WIS. WOMEN'S L.J. 191 (1996).

Craig Allen Nard, Empirical Legal Scholarship: Reestablishing a Dialogue Between the Academy and Profession, 30 WAKE FOREST L. REV.

347 (1995).

Note, 'Round and 'Round the Bramble Bush: From Legal Realism to Critical Legal Scholarship, 95 HARV. L. REV. 1669 (1982).

Reginald Leamon Robinson, Split Personalities: Teaching and Scholarship in Nonstereotypical Areas of the Law, 19 W. NEW ENG. L.

REV. 73 (1997) (panel).

Celina Romany, Claiming A Global Identity: Latino/a Critical Scholarship and International Human Rights, 28 U. MIAMI INTER-AM.

L. REV. 215 (1996).

764 [Vol. 49

Beverly J. Ross, Does Diversity in Legal Scholarship Make a Differ- ence?: A Look at the Law of Rape, 100 DICK. L. REv. 795 (1996).

Edward L. Rubin, Public Choice and Legal Scholarship, 46 J. LEGAL EDUC. 490 (1996).

Edward L. Rubin, The Practice and Discourse of Legal Scholarship, 86 MICH. L. REv. 1835 (1988).

Margaret M. Russell, "A New Scholarly Song": Race, Storytelling, and the Law, 33 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 1057 (1993) (reviewing DERRICK BELL, FACES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE WELL: THE PERMANENCE OF RACISM and PATRICIA J. WILLIAMS, THE ALCHEMY OF RACE AND RIGHTS).

Steven Shiffrin, Liberalism, Radicalism, and Legal Scholarship, 30 UCLA L. REV. 1103 (1983).

Peter H. Schuck, Why Don't Law Professors Do More Empirical Research?, 39 J. LEGAL EDUC. 323 (1989).

David A. Skeel, Jr., Public Choice and the Future of Public-Choice- Influenced Legal Scholarship, 50 VAND. L. REV. 647 (1997).

Jean Stefancic, The Law Review Symposium: A Hard Party to Crash for Crits, Feminists, and Other Outsiders, 71 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 989

(1996).

Jean Stefancic, Listen to the Voices: An Essay on Legal Scholarship, Women, and Minorities, 11 LEG. REF. SERV. Q. 141 (1991) (symposium of law publishers).

Jean Stefancic & Richard Delgado, Outsider Scholars: The Early Stories, 71 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 1001 (1996).

Mark V. Tushnet, Interdisciplinary Legal Scholarship: The Case of History-in-Law, 71 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 909 (1996).

Robert P. Wasson, Jr., Introductory Comments by Panelist Robert P.

Wasson, Jr., on Split Personalities: Teaching and Scholarship in Non- Stereotypical Areas of the Law, 19 W. NEW ENG. L. REV. 102 (1997).

766

MERCER LAW REVIEW [Vol. 49

(1994).

James Boyd White, Why I Write, 53 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 1021 (1996).

Robert A. Williams, Jr., Vampires Anonymous and Critical Race Practice, 95 MICH. L. REV. 741 (1997).

Eric K. Yamamoto, Critical Race Praxis: Race Theory and Political Lawyering Practice in Post-Civil Rights America, 95 MICH. L. REV. 821 (1997).

Alfred C. Yen, Unhelpful, 81 IowA L. REV. 1573 (1996).

Franklin E. Zimring, Where Do the New Scholars Learn New Scholarship?, 33 J. LEGAL EDuc. 453 (1983).

Critiques of the Publication and Editorial Process

Edited Transcript of the Comments of the Panel at the AALS Proposed Section on Scholarship and Law Reviews, 70 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 117 (1994) (Symposium on Law Review Editing: The Struggle Between Author and Editor Over Control of the Text).

The Honorable James C. Hill, Remarks Made at the 1993 National Conference of Law Reviews, 45 MERCER L. REV. 577 (1994).

Ann Althouse, Who's to Blame for Law Reviews?, 70 CHI.-KENT L. REV.

81 (1994).

Arthur D. Austin, Footnote Skulduggery and Other Bad Habits, 44 U.

MIAMI L. REV. 1009 (1990).

Arthur D. Austin, The "Custom of Vetting" as a Substitute for Peer Review, 32 ARIZ. L. REV. 1 (1990).

Randy E. Barnett, Beyond the Moot Law Review: A Short Story With a Happy Ending, 70 CHi.-KENT L. REV. 123 (1994).

Lise A. Barrera, Law Review Editing and Choe v. Fordham University School of Law: Is the Courtroom the New Front for Resolution of Publishing Disputes?, 42 WAYNE L. REV. 2183 (1996).

John F. Bramfeld, Love those Law Reviews, 5 SCRIBES J. LEGAL WRITING 101 (1994/1995).

Michael L. Closen & Robert J. Dzielak, The History and Influence of the Law Review Institution, 30 AKRON L. REv. 15 (1996).

Michael L. Closen, A Proposed Code of Professional Responsibility for Law Reviews, 63 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 55 (1988).

Roger C. Cramton, "The Most Remarkable Institution:" The American Law Review, 36 J. LEGAL EDUC. 1 (1986).

Phil Nichols, A Student Defense of Student Edited Journals: In Response to Professor Roger Cramton, 1987 DUKE L.J. 1122 (1987).

Howard Denemark, How Valid is the Often-Repeated Accusation that There Are Too Many Legal Articles and Too Many Law Reviews?, 30 AKRON L. REv. 215 (1996).

Howard A. Denemark, The Death of Law Reviews has been Predicted:

What Might be Lost when the Last Law Review Shuts Down?, 27 SETON HALL L. REV. 1 (1997).

Richard A. Epstein, Faculty-Edited Law Journals, 70 CHI.-KENT L.

REV. 87 (1994).

Cyril Glasser, Radicals and Refugees: The Foundation of the Modern Law Review and English Legal Scholarship, 50 MOD. L. REV. 688 (1987).

Chris Goodrich, Professor, Edit Thyself; Faculty-Edited Law Reviews Are Threatening to Take Legal Scholarship Out of the Hands of Babes,

6 CAL. LAW. 48 (July 1986).

James D. Gordon, III, Law Review and the Modern Mind, 33 ARIZ. L.

REV. 265 (1991).

Stephen R. Heifetz, Efficient Matching: Reforming the Market for Law Review Articles, 5 GEO. MASON L. REV. 629 (1997).

768 MERCER LAW REVIEW [Vol. 49 Bernard, J. Hibbitts, Last Writes? Reassessing the Law Review in the Age of Cyberspace, 71 N.YU. L. REV. 615 (1996).

Bernard J. Hibbitts, Yesterday Once More: Skeptics, Scribes and the Demise of Law Reviews, 30 AKRON L. REV. 267 (1996).

Henry H. Perritt, Jr., Reassessing Professor Hibbitts's Requiem for Law Reviews, 30 AKRON L. REV. 255 (1996).

David A. Rier, The Future of Legal Scholarship and Scholarly Communication: Publication in the Age of Cyberspace, 30 AKRON L.

REV. 183 (1996).

William G. Ross, Scholarly Legal Monographs: Advantages of the Road Less Taken, 30 AKRON L. REV. 259 (1996).

Graham Hughes, The Great American Legal Scholarship Bazaar, 33 J. LEGAL EDUC. 424 (1983).

Robert M. Jarvis & Phyllis G. Coleman, Ranking Law Reviews: An Empirical Analysis Based on Author Prominence, 39 ARIZ. L. REV. 15 (1997).

Robert M. Jarvis, Law Review Authors and Professional Responsibility:

A Proposal for Articulated Standards, 38 DRAKE L. REV. 889 (1989).

Eric M. Jensen, The Law Review Manuscript Glut: The Need for Guidelines, 39 J. LEGAL EDUC. 383 (1989).

M. Ethan Katsh, Law Reviews and the Migration to Cyberspace, 29 AKRON L. REV. 115 (1996).

D.H. Kaye, Dear Editor, 39 J. LEGAL EDUc. 427 (1989).

Jordan H. Leibman & James P. White, How the Student-Edited Law Journals Make Their Publication Decisions, 39 J. LEGAL EDUC 387 (1989).

James Lindgren, Reforming the American Law Review, 47 STAN. L.

REV. 1123 (1995).

James Lindgren, An Author's Manifesto, 61 U. CHI. L. REV. 527 (1994).

Wendy J. Gordon, Counter-Manifesto: Student-Edited Reviews and the Intellectual Properties of Scholarship, 61 U. CHI. L. REV.

541 (1994).

James Lindgren, A Response, 61 U. CHI. L. REV. 553 (1994).

James Lindgren, Student Editing: Using Education to Move Beyond Struggle, 70 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 95 (1994).

James Lindgren, Fear of Writing, 78 CAL. L. REV. 1677 (1990) (review essay).

James Lindgren, Return to Sender, 78 CAL. L. REV. 1719 (1990).

Ira C. Lupu, Six Authors in Search of a Character, 70 CHI.-KENT L.

REV. 71 (1994).

Gregory E. Maggs, Self-Publication on the Internet and the Future of Law Reviews, 30 AKRON L. REV. 237 (1996).

Gregory E. Maggs, Just Say No?, 70 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 101 (1994).

Leo P. Martinez, Babies, Bathwater, and Law Reviews, 47 STAN. L.

REV. 1139 (1995).

Bernard D. Meltzer, Ruminations About Law Reviews, 37 LAW SCH.

REC. 15 (1991).

John T. Noonan, Jr., Law Reviews, 47 STAN. L. REV. 1117 (1995).

Juan F. Perea, After Getting to Yes: A Survival Guide for Law Review Editors and Faculty Writers, 48 FLA. L. REV. 867 (1996).

Richard A. Posner, The Future of the Student-Edited Law Review, 47 STAN. L. REV. 1131 (1995).

Cheryl B. Preston, It Moves, Even if We Don't: A Reply to Arthur Austin, "The Top Ten Politically Correct Law Reviews," 63 TENN. L. REV.

735 (1996).

Lisa R. Pruitt, Law Review Story, 50 ARK. L. REV. 77 (1997).

770

MERCER LAW REVIEW [Vol. 49

E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Law Review's Empire, 39 HASTINGS L.J. 859 (1988).

Carol Sanger, Editing, 82 GEO. L.J. 513 (1993).

Fred R. Shapiro, The Most-Cited Law Review Articles, 73 CAL. L. REV.

1540 (1985).

Peter Stein, Law Reviews and Legal Culture, 70 TUL. L. REV. 2675 (1996) (essay).

Jean Stefancic, The Law Review Symposium Issue: Community of Meaning or Re-Inscription of Hierarchy?, 63 U. COLO. L. REV. 651 (1992).

Max Stier, Kelly M. Klaus, Dan L. Bagatell & Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Law Review Usage and Suggestions for Improvement: A Survey of Attorneys, Professors, and Judges, 44 STAN. L. REV. 1467 (1992).

Carl Tobias, Manuscript Selection Anti-Manifesto, 80 CORNELL L. REV.

529 (1995).

Mark V. Tushnet, The Death of An Author, By Himself, 70 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 111 (1994).

Michael Vieiello, Journal Wars (Between Law Review Editors), 22 ST.

MARY'S L.J. 927 (1991).

E. Joshua Rosenkranz, The Empire Strikes Back (Response to Michael Vieiello's Article on Law Review Editors), 22 ST. MARY'S L.J. 943 (1991).

Robert Weisberg, Some Ways to Think About Law Reviews, 47 STAN.

L. REV. 1147 (1995).

William C. Whitford, The Need for an Exclusive Submission Policy for Law Review Articles, 1994 WIs. L. REV. 231 (forum).