• No results found

Genetic Variations In Sites Of Affinity Between Fviii And Lrp1 Are Not Associated With High Fviii Levels In Venous Thromboembolism

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Genetic Variations In Sites Of Affinity Between Fviii And Lrp1 Are Not Associated With High Fviii Levels In Venous Thromboembolism"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Genetic variations in sites of affinity

between FVIII and LRP1 are not

associated with high FVIII levels in venous

thromboembolism

Luis F. Bittar, Lucia H. Siqueira, Fernanda A. Orsi, Erich V. De Paula & Joyce M. Annichino-Bizzacchi

Hematology and Hemotherapy Center, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

Increased factor VIII (FVIII) levels are a prevalent and independent risk factor for venous

thromboembolism (VTE). The low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) has been

associated with FVIII catabolism. After a median of 10 years of the first thrombotic episode, we evaluated

FVIII activity levels in 75 patients with VTE and high FVIII levels and in 74 healthy controls. Subsequently,

we evaluated the regions of

F8 and LRP1 genes coding sites of affinity between these proteins, with the

objective of determining genetic alterations associated with plasma FVIII levels. After a median time of 10

years after the VTE episode, FVIII levels were significantly higher in patients when compared to controls

(158.6 IU/dL vs. 125.8 IU/dL; P # 0.001]. Despite the fact that we found 14 genetic variations in

F8 and

LRP1 genes, no relationship was found between FVIII levels with these variations. We demonstrated a

persistent increase of FVIII levels in patients with VTE, but in a much lower magnitude after 10 years when

compared to 3-years after the episode. Moreover, we observed no relationship of genetic variations in the

gene regions coding affinity sites between LRP1 and FVIII with FVIII levels.

V

enous thromboembolism (VTE) is a multifactorial disease, and increased levels of coagulation factor VIII

(FVIII) have been established as a prevalent and independent risk factor for the first episode and recurrent

VTE

1–4

. We previously demonstrated that increased levels of FVIII are associated with VTE in Brazilian

patients

5

. The main determinants of FVIII in plasma are von Willebrand factor (VWF) and ABO blood group

6–7

.

Although FVIII is an acute phase protein, results from previous studies suggested that increased FVIII levels in

VTE patients are independent of an acute reaction

8–11

and a familial clustering was observed

12–14

. Analysis of

FVIII gene showed several polymorphisms, but without any correlation with elevated FVIII levels

15–18

.

The low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1), also known as a2-macrogobulin receptor or

CD91 is a large (600 kDa) multifunctional receptor which belongs to the low-density lipoprotein receptor family

of endocytic receptors. LRP1 is involved in clearance of many different ligands, including FVIII

19

. The first

evidence of the role of LRP1 in clearance of FVIII was simultaneously described by two studies. The authors

showed by surface plasmon resonance analysis that FVIII binds to LRP1 with a moderate affinity. Moreover,

assays in cell culture of fibroblasts and in vivo animal model showed that radioactive FVIII (

I-125

FVIII) specifically

binds to LRP1 mediating the internalization and subsequent degradation of FVIII, indicating that LRP1 plays an

important role in FVIII clearance

20,21

. Bovenschen et al

22

confirmed the role of LRP1 in the clearance of FVIII

employing an in vivo LRP1-deficient mouse model. Although several studies investigated the correlation between

polymorphisms in LRP1 gene and plasma levels of FVIII and VTE

14,23–26

, only C663T polymorphism showed

association with elevated FVIII levels and VTE risk

25

.

The ligand-binding sites within the extracellular domain of LRP1 are composed by four clusters of

complement-type repeats (CRs), and each CR is formed by approximately 40 amino acids. Clusters II and IV

were shown to be responsible for the binding of majority of LRP1 ligands, including FVIII. The LRP1 cluster II

consists of 8 CRs, and it was demonstrated that FVIII has affinity for the first six CRs of cluster II

27–29

. Within the

FVIII molecule, two high-affinity binding sites for LRP1 have been identified: the region 484–509 of the A2

domain and the region 1811–1818 of the A3 domain; and a low-affinity site in the region 2303–2333 of the C2

domain

30–33

.

SUBJECT AREAS:

DNA SEQUENCING THROMBOEMBOLISM GENETICS RESEARCH

Received

3 November 2014

Accepted

25 February 2015

Published

18 March 2015

Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to L.F.B. (lfbsckayer@ hotmail.com)

(2)

Therefore, genetic variations in these regions could potentially

affect FVIII clearance, thereby influencing the plasma FVIII levels.

Herein, we investigated the presence of genetic variations in gene

regions coding sites of affinity between FVIII and LRP1 in patients

with history of VTE and persistently elevated FVIII levels.

Results

Median age of the 75 patients (22 male e 53 female) was 47 years, and

median time after the fist VTE episode was 10 years (range 8–15).

The control group consisted of 74 participants (28 male and 46

female) with a median age of 45 years. There was no significant

difference between patients and controls related to gender, age,

and ABO blood group (Table 1).

Venous thromboembolism was spontaneous in 28 (37.3%)

patients. In the remaining 47 (62.7%) patients, associated risk factors

were surgery (8.0%), immobilization (17.3%), oral contraceptive use

(21.3%), pregnancy and puerperium (12.0%), among other less

pre-valent causes (4.1%). The sites of VTE were: lower limbs (88,1%),

splenic-portal circulation (7,4%) and upper extremities (4,5%). Four

(5,3%) patients with venous thrombosis of the lower limbs also

pre-sented pulmonary embolism.

Table 1 shows that in the first assessment, with a median time of

the first VTE episode of 3 years (range 1–8), FVIII levels was

232.4 IU/dL, and significantly higher than in controls (126.9 IU/

dL; P # 0.001). In the second assessment, with a median time of

the first VTE episode of 10 years (range 8–15), FVIII levels was still

significantly higher in patients (158.6 IU/dL) than in controls

(125.8 IU/dL; P # 0.001), although with a lower magnitude.

In the first assessment, all 75 patients included in this study had

FVIII above the P90 (200.0 IU/dL) since thus was a prior inclusion

criteria for this study. During the second analysis, the P90 was

170.3 IU/dL, and only 26 patients (34.7%) remained above this

per-centile. Therefore, we observed a significant decrease in the number

of patients with increased FVIII levels in the second analysis (P #

0.001). CRP levels in patients with VTE were between normal values

(0.11 mg/dL) but significantly lower when compared to the first

measure with 3-year median after venous thromboembolism episode

(0.21 mg/dL; P 5 0.003).

We identified 14 genetic variations, including 12 in LRP1 gene and

2 in F8 gene. Molecular alterations previously described were

clas-sified as mutation (allelic prevalence , 1%) or polymorphism (allelic

prevalence $ 1%) according to their prevalence in the population of

NCBI database, composed of 1000 healthy individuals (2000 alleles).

Novel genetic variations were classified according to their prevalence

in the control group of the study, thus, two were classified as

poly-morphisms and twelve as mutations. Of the 12 mutations identified,

three had not yet been described. Despite the identification of several

genetic alterations, no significant difference was observed in their

prevalence between patients and controls, with no association with

VTE history (Table 2).

The comparison of plasma FVIII levels according to genotypes of

LRP1 polymorphisms in the VTE patients group did not show

stat-istical differences (Table 3).

Discussion

The mechanisms underlying the elevation of FVIII levels in VTE

patients are not totally established. The main determinants of

FVIII in plasma are the von Willebrand factor (VWF) level and

the ABO blood group. Moreover, age and ethnicity also have an

important role in the regulation of FVIII levels. Immediately after

its release into the circulation, FVIII is caught into a tight

non-cova-lent complex with the VWF. The VWF acts as a natural carrier of

Table 1 | Baseline Characteristics of Patients with Venous Thromboembolism and Control Group

VTE Patients (N575) Controls (N574) P*

Age - Median (Interquartile Range) 47 (40–55) 45 (36–51) 0.28

Gender - Female/Male (%) 70.7%/29.3% 62.2%/37.8% 0.29

ABO Blood Group - Non-O/O (%) 68.0%/32.0% 67.6%/32.4% 1.00

FVIII - First Assessment (2004) [IU/dL](Interquartile) 232.4 (216.2–286.1) 126.9 (98.8–145.8) #0.001 FVIII - Second Assessment (2011) [IU/dL](Interquartile) 158.6 (148.5–171.0) 125.8 (93.4–148.6) #0.001

This table shows baseline characteristics of VTE patients and controls.

*P values were calculated by the Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables. Abbreviations: FVIII 5 factor VIII; VTE 5 venous thromboembolism.

Table 2 | Genetic variations identified in LRP1 and F8 genes

Nucleotide change Amino acidchange Gene Region NCBI Code Prevalence of mutantallele in the NCBI (%)* Classification Prevalence of mutant allele inthe study Patients/Controls % (N) P* C 2767 T Arg 767 Arg LRP1 Exon 14 rs145618022 0.2 Mutation T: 0.67 (1)/0.68 (1) 1

C 2805 T Thr 780 Ile LRP1 Exon 14 rs34492744 0.3 Mutation T: ZERO (0)/0.68 (1) 1

C 28701167 T NA LRP1 Intron 14 rs35306126 0.6 Mutation T: ZERO (0)/0.68 (1) 1

C 28701197 T NA LRP1 Intron 14 rs34709055 0.6 Mutation T: ZERO (0)/0.68 (1) 1

G 2996126 A NA LRP1 Intron 15 rs138196021 0.1 Mutation A: 0.67 (1)/ZERO (0) 1

C 3137154 T NA LRP1 Intron 16 rs181881519 0.1 Mutation T: 0.67 (1)/ZERO (0) 1

G 3137181 A NA LRP1 Intron 16 rs1800174 40.0 Polymorphism A: 39.3 (59)/35.8 (53) 0.59

G 31371111 A NA LRP1 Intron 16 Novel NA Mutation A: 0.67 (1)/ZERO (0) 1

G 3264 -172 A NA LRP1 Intron 17 Novel NA Mutation A: ZERO (0)/0.68 (1) 1

C 3264 - 3 T NA LRP1 Intron 17 Novel NA Mutation T: 0.67 (1)/ZERO (0) 1

G 3376 A Ser 970 Ser LRP1 Exon 18 rs78054559 0.1 Mutation A: 0.67 (1)/ZERO (0) 1

T 33801114 C NA LRP1 Intron 18 rs34474417 2.2 Polymorphism C: 2.66 (4)/ZERO (0) 0.13

T 1444 - 22 C NA F8 Intron 9 rs5986899 0.7 Mutation C: 0.67 (1)/ZERO (0) 1

C 7053 1 32 T NA F8 39 UTR rs5986887 0.9 Mutation T: 0.67 (1)/ZERO (0) 1

This table shows information about mutations and polymorphisms found in the study, including their prevalence in patients and controls, and NCBI database.

*Genetic alterations previously described were classified as mutation (allelic prevalence , 1%) or polymorphism (allelic prevalence $ 1%) according to their prevalence in the population of NCBI analysis, composed of 1000 healthy individuals (2000 alleles).

**P values were calculated by the Fisher’s exact test. Abbreviations: NCBI 5 The National Center for Biotechnology Information; Arg 5 Arginine; Thr 5 threonine; Ile 5 Isoleucine; Ser 5 Serine; 39 UTR 5 39 untranslated region; NA 5 Not Applicable.

(3)

FVIII, and the complex VWF/FVIII is crucial for the survival of

FVIII in the blood circulation by protects it against impropriated

proteolytic activation and premature clearance. Therefore, it is not

surprising that plasma VWF level plays a critical role in regulating

plasma FVIII levels. However, the mechanisms underlying the

inter-individual variability of plasma FVIII levels are not yet fully

under-stood, and these main determinants explain only a part of FVIII

levels variation. Thus, it has been suggested that others unknown

important factors (mainly genetic factors) could have participation

on FVIII variation

34

.

Previous studies that evaluated patients with VTE and increased

FVIII levels suggested a familial clustering of high FVIII levels

12–14

.

For example, in a retrospective study of 177 VTE patients with high

FVIII levels, Bank et al. (2005) observed that 40% of their first-degree

relatives also presented FVIII levels above the 75th percentile of the

normal population. Moreover, these first-degree relatives with

ele-vated plasma FVIII levels also demonstrated increased risk for

VTE

13

.

In the present study, we hypothesized that genetic variations in

gene regions coding the affinity sites between FVIII and LRP1 might

influence plasma FVIII levels, and that a cohort of VTE patients with

persistently elevated FVIII levels might be an interesting target for

screening these genetic variations. By selecting this population, we

hoped increase the possibility for detecting clinically relevant

muta-tions or polymorphisms associated with elevated FVIII levels. With

this strategy, we identified two mutations in the analyzed regions of

F8 gene, one in intron 9 and other in the 39 UTR region, present in

one VTE patient. Morange et al. (2005) evaluated these same regions

of F8 gene, in 10 healthy individuals with the top higher and lower

FVIII levels of 424 healthy individuals. No polymorphism was

detected in these regions of the F8 gene

14

. In accordance with our

results, genetic variations in these F8 gene regions are probably not

associated with elevated FVIII levels.

Two studies simultaneously identified the LRP1 as a first

candid-ate clearance receptor for FVIII

20,21

, and in the last decade, several

studies have analyzed the influence of LRP1 on FVIII levels in

humans

14,25–28

. In particular, investigators have focused their

research on analyze the association between LRP1 polymorphisms

and plasma FVIII levels, and VTE risk. Association between LRP1

D2080N and –25C/G polymorphisms with decreased FVIII

levels

14,26

, and LRP1 C663T polymorphism with increased FVIII

levels and with a three-fold increased risk of VTE have been

described

25

.

Although we identified 12 mutations/polymorphisms in the

region of LRP1 gene, these were not associated with FVIII levels.

Our results suggest no association of genetic variations located in

the first six CRs of cluster II of LRP1 with plasma FVIII levels, but we

could not ruled out the role of variations affecting other important

affinity region, localized in cluster IV

27–29

. We can also consider that

despite the efficiency which LRP1 binds FVIII and mediates its

intra-cellular degradation, the absence of LRP1 resulted only in a partial

inhibition of FVIII degradation when evaluated in vivo assays,

indi-cating that other LRP1-independent pathways are involved in FVIII

uptake

22,35

.

Finally, in this study, we showed that patients with a median of 10

years after the first episode of VTE presented higher FVIII levels

when compared to healthy controls, but the magnitude of this

dif-ference was significantly lower than that observed at an earlier time

point. These findings suggest the presence of stimulus to increase

FVIII levels that could be stronger during the initial years after the

VTE episode. CRP is expressed at low levels in the absence of an acute

inflammatory stimulus, and the results found in our patients

sug-gested that, they did not present an acute inflammatory response in

both assessments. Our results corroborate other studies that analyzed

inflammatory markers after VTE and almost all demonstrated

decline of CRP after a short time

11,36,37

Thus, these findings suggested

that increased FVIII levels observed in patients with previous VTE

be, in part, consequence of a sub-clinical chronic inflammation, not

revealed by CRP. In accordance with this hypothesis, Bouman et al.

(2014) performed an evaluation 63 months after the acute

throm-botic episode describing increased levels of IL-6 in patients when

compared to controls

38

. Thus, we cannot rule out that even years

after the thrombotic episode, a sub-clinical chronic inflammatory

state could contribute to high levels of FVIII in VTE patients.

Thus far, strengths of the present study are the evaluation of

spe-cific gene regions coding the affinity sites between FVIII and LRP1

that might influence plasma FVIII levels, in a well-defined

popu-lation of cases with a history of high FVIII levels and matched

con-trols. However, an important limitation of this study is the relatively

small sample size, which should be considered in the evaluation of

associations between the genetic alterations and high FVIII levels.

Therefore, this was an exploratory study and a relationship between

the genetic variations found, high FVIII levels and VTE remains to be

clarified by larger studies.

Conclusions

We demonstrated a persistent increase of plasma FVIII levels in a

subset of patients with VTE, but in a much lower magnitude after 10

years of VTE episode when compared to the first evaluation 3-years

after the episode. Moreover, we observed no relationship between

genetic variations in the gene regions coding sites of affinity between

LRP1 and FVIII proteins and FVIII levels.

Methods

Study Population.Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of University of Campinas. All the methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. This was a case-control study and initial cohort consisted of 314 adult patients with a first episode of VTE, between January 1990 and September 2004, followed up at the Hemostasis and Thrombosis Clinic, at University of Campinas, Brazil. Patients with cancer, liver, renal, or systemic inflammatory diseases were excluded. VTE was confirmed by imaging tests. In a first assessment, with a median time of three years

Table 3 | Plasma FVIII levels according to genotypes in VTE patients

Polymorphisms N FVIII - 1u Assessment [IU/dL]* FVIII - 2u Assessment [IU/dL]*

G 3137181A GG 27 238.3 (219.3–276.3) 164.0 (153.3–174.5) GA 37 252.6 (223.6–326.0) 156.0 (150.5–172.8) AA 11 240.8 (223.5–283.0) 158.0 (134.0–160.2) P 5 0.66** P 5 0.47** T 33801114 C TT 71 239.9 (218.3–298.1) 157.1 (148.0–171.0) TC 4 233.4 (212.7–241.7) 168.0 (163.0–173.0) P 5 0.43** P 5 0.33**

This table shows plasma FVIII levels in VTE patients according their genotypes for LRP1 polymorphisms. *Results are expressed as median (interquartile range).

(4)

after the acute episode, FVIII levels were evaluated in all 314 patients and in 314 matched controls, without a medical history of VTE from the same geographic region and ethnic background of the patients. Seven years later, all 104 patients from this initial cohort who originally presented FVIII levels above the 90thpercentile (P90)

were recruited for a second assessment, but only 75 patients (72.1%) agreed to participate. Seventy-four healthy controls were again selected according to age, gender, ABO blood group, geographic region, ethnic background, and the same exclusion criteria were used for the study entry.

Laboratory Methods.After an overnight fast, venous blood samples (18 mL) were collected from all participants, from the antecubital vein into into VacuetteH tubes (Greiner Bio-One, Austria): 0.129 mmol/L trisodium citrate tube,

ethylenediaminetetraacetic (EDTA) tube, and Z Serum Sep Clot Activator tube. Samples were immediately centrifuged for 20 minutes at 1500 g, and plasma/serum were immediately frozen and stored at 280uC.

FVIII Activity.FVIII activity levels were measured by a one-stage clotting assay with FVIII-deficient plasma (Siemens, Marburg, Germany) as recommended by the manufacturer. FVIII were determined in duplicate on automated coagulation analyzer (BCS XP, Siemens, Marburg, Germany). This methodology was performed in both assessments. Normal range was 62 to 151 IU/dL.

C-reactive protein.Serum high sensitive C-Reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were determined by a nephelometric method (Siemens, Marburg, Germany), on Siemens BN ProSpec analyzer. Normal range was , 0.50 mg/dL.

ABO blood group.ABO blood group was determined by agglutination and adsorption-elution test.

Sequencing of the LRP1 and F8 gene regions potentially involved in LRP1-FVIII binding.Three regions were selected in F8 gene: (i) exons 10 and 11 (containing the site Arg484-Phe509 in the A2 domain), (ii) exon 16 (containing the site Lys1804-Ala1834 in the A3 domain), and (iii) exon 26 (containing the site Thr2303-Tyr2333 in the C2 region). In the LRP1 gene, exons 14 to 20 (containing the site of the first six CRs of cluster II) were selected. All these regions were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Primer sequences, PCR products and length of PCR products are listed in the Supplementary Table S1.

PCR products were checked on 2% agarose gels (Uniscience, Brazil) stained with 2 ug/ml ethidium bromide (Invitrogen, USA), and purified by commercial kit GFX PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification Kit (GE Healthcare). Subsequently, these products were sequenced by the Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (Life Technologies, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions for subsequent electrophoresis in automatic sequencer ABI PRISMH 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA). The analysis of sequencing was performed by the Chromas software (version 2.3.0), comparing the samples sequences to database of The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), NG_016444.1 for LRP1 gene and NG_011403.1 for F8 gene.

Statistical analysis.Continuous variables were described as median and interquartile range. Medians between patients and controls were compared by the Mann-Whitney test, and categorical variables were compared by the Fisher’s exact test. Genotype frequencies between patients and controls were compared by the Fisher’s exact test. Medians of FVIII levels according the genotypes were compared by Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis tests. A P value ,0.05 was considered statistically significant and all tests were two-tailed. All analysis was performed by the R Foundation for Statistical Computing, version 3.0.1.

1. Bank, I. et al. Absolute annual incidences of first events of venous

thromboembolism and arterial vascular events in individuals with elevated FVIII - A prospective family cohort study. Thromb Haemost 98, 1040–1044 (2007). 2. Kraaijenhagen, R. A. et al. High plasma concentration of factor VIIIc is a major

risk for venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 83, 5–9 (2000). 3. Cosmi, B., Legnani, C., Cini, M., Favaretto, E. & Palareti, G. D-dimer and factor

VIII are independent risk factors for recurrence after anticoagulation withdrawal for a first idiopathic deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Res 122, 610–617 (2008). 4. Ota, S. et al. High Plasma Level of Factor VIII - An Important Risk Factor for

Venous Thromboembolism. Circ J 75, 1472–1475 (2011).

5. Mello, T. B. T., Machado, T. F., Montava˜o, S. A., Ozello, M. C. & Annichino-Bizzacchi, J. M. Assessing the coagulation factor levels, inherited thrombophilia, and ABO blood group on the risk for venous thrombosis among Brazilians. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 15, 408–414 (2009).

6. Tirado, I. et al. The ABO blood group genotype and factor VIII levels as independent risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 93, 468–474 (2005).

7. Flinterman, L. E., Vlieg, A. V. H., Rosendaal, F. R. & Doggen, C. J. M. Venous thrombosis of the upper extremity: effect of blood group and coagulation factor levels on risk. Br J Haematol 149, 118–123 (2010).

8. O’Donnell, J., Mumford, A. D., Manning, R. A. & Laffan, M. Elevation of VIIIc in venous thromboembolism is persistent and independent of the acute phase response. Thromb Haemost 83, 10–13 (2000).

9. Kyrle, P. A. et al. High plasma levels of factor VIII and risk or recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 343, 457–462 (2000).

10. Kamphuisen, P. W. et al. Increased Levels of Factor VIII and Fibrinogen in Patients with Venous Thrombosis Are not Caused by Acute Phase Reactions. Thromb Haemost 81, 680–683 (1999).

11. Tichelaar, V., Mulder, A., Kluin-Nelemans, H. & Meijer, K. The acute phase reaction explains only a part of initially elevated factor VIII:C levels: A prospective cohort study in patients with venous thrombosis. Thromb Res 129, 183–186 (2012).

12. Kamphuisen, P. W. et al. Familial clustering of factor VIII and von Willebrand factor levels. Thromb Haemost 79, 323–327 (1998).

13. Bank, I. et al. Elevated levels of FVIII:C within families are associated with an increased risk for venous and arterial thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 3, 79–84 (2005).

14. Morange, P. E. et al. Biological and genetic factors influencing plasma factor VIII levels in a healthy family population: results from the Stanislas cohort. Br J Haematol 128, 91–99 (2005).

15. Kamphuisen, P. W. et al. High factor VIII antigen levels increase the risk of venous thrombosis but are not associated with polymorphisms in the von Willebrand factor and factor VIII gene. Br J Haematol 115, 156–158 (2001).

16. Viel, K. R. et al. A sequence variation scan of the coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) structural gene and associations with plasma FVIII activity levels. Blood 109, 3713–3724 (2007).

17. Ay, M., Dolek, B., Erdem, G., Devecioglu, O. & Gozukirmizi, N. Is There Any Correlation Between The Elevated Plasma Levels and Gene Variations of Factor VIII in Turkish Thrombosis Patients? Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 17, 46–50 (2011).

18. Mansvelt, E. P. G., Laffan, M., McVey, J. H. & Tuddenham, E. G. D. Analysis of the F8 gene in individuals with high plasma factor VIII:C levels and associated venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 80, 561–565 (1998).

19. Herz, J. & Strickland, D. K. LRP: a multifunctional scavenger and signaling receptor. J Clin Invest 108, 779–784 (2001).

20. Saenko, E. L., Yakhyaev, A. V., Mikhailenko, I., Strickland, D. K., Sarafanov, A. G. Role of the low density lipoprotein-related protein receptor in mediation of factor VIII catabolism. J Biol Chemist 274, 37685–37692 (1999).

21. Lenting, P. J. et al. The light chain of factor VIII comprises a binding site for low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein. J Biol Chemist 274, 23734–23739 (1999).

22. Bovenschen, N. et al. Elevated plasma factor VIII in a mouse model of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related deficiency. Blood 101, 3933–3939 (2003). 23. Cunningham, N., Laffan, M. A., Manning, R. A. & O’Donnell, J. S. Low density

lipoprotein receptor-related protein polymorphisms in patients with elevated factor VIII coagulant activity and venous thrombosis. Blood Coagul Fibrinol 16, 465–468 (2005).

24. Marchetti, G. et al. Contribution of low density lipoprotein recptor-related protein genotypes to coagulation factor VIII levels in thrombotic women. Haematologica 91, 1261–1263 (2006).

25. Vormittag, R. et al. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) polymorphism 663 C-T affects clotting factor VIII activity and increases the risk of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost 5, 497–502 (2007).

26. Mello, T. B., Siqueira, L. H., Montava˜o, S. A., Ozello, M. C. & Annichino-Bizzacchi, J. M. Low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein polymorphisms are not risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res 121, 625–629 (2008).

27. Sarafanov, A. G. et al. Localization of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein regions involved in binding to the A2 domain of coagulation factor VIII. Thromb Haemost 98, 1170–1181 (2007).

28. Neels, J. G. et al. The second and fourth cluster of class A cysteine-rich repeats of the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein share ligand-binding properties. J Biol Chem 274, 31305–31311 (1999).

29. Meijer, A. B. et al. Functional duplication of ligand-binding domains within low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein for interaction with receptor associated protein, a2-macroglobulin, factor IXa, and factor VIII. Biochim Biophys Acta 1774, 714–722 (2007).

30. Bovenschen, N., van Stempvoort, G., Voorberg, J., Mertens, K. & Meijer, A. B. Proteolytic cleavage of factor VIII heavy chain is required to expose the binding-site for low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein within the A2 domain. J Thromb Haemost 4, 1487–1493 (2006).

31. Sarafanov, A. G. et al. Identification of coagulation factor VIII A2 domain residues forming the binding epitope for low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein. Biochemistry 45, 1829–1840 (2006).

32. Bovenschen, N. et al. Low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein and factor IXa share structural requirements for binding to the A3 domain of coagulation factor VIII. J Biol Chem 278, 9370–9377 (2003).

33. Ananyeva, N. M. et al. Interaction of coagulation factor VIII with members of the low-density lipoprotein receptor family follows common mechanism and involves consensus residues within the A2 binding site 484-509. Blood Coagul Fibrinol 19, 543–555 (2008).

34. Jenkins, P. V., Rawley, O., Smith, O. P. & O’Donnell, J. S. Elevated factor VIII levels and risk of venous thrombosis. Br J Haematol 157, 653–663 (2012).

(5)

35. Espirito Santo, S. M. S. et al. Hepatic low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein deficiency in mice increases atherosclerosis independent of plasma cholesterol. Blood 103, 3777–3782 (2004).

36. Roumen-Klappe, E. M. et al. Inflammation in deep vein thrombosis and the development of post- thrombotic syndrome: a prospective study. J Thromb Haemost 7, 582–587 (2009).

37. Gremmel, T. et al. Soluble p-selectin, D-dimer, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein after acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb. J Vasc Surg 54, 48S–55S (2011).

38. Bouman, A. C. et al. Biomarkers for post thrombotic syndrome: A case-control study. Thromb Res 134, 369–375 (2014).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Fundaça˜o de Amparo a` Pesquisa do Estado de Sa˜o Paulo (FAPESP) for the financial support (FAPESP, nu 2009/53543-6).

Author contributions

L.F.B., L.H.S., F.L.O., E.V.P. and J.M.A-B. designed the experiments and analyzed the data. L.F.B., E.V.P. and J.M.A.-B. wrote the manuscript text. L.F.B. performed the experiments and L.H.S. assisted with primers design. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Additional information

Supplementary informationaccompanies this paper at http://www.nature.com/ scientificreports

Competing financial interests:The authors declare no competing financial interests. How to cite this article:Bittar, L.F., Siqueira, L.H., Orsi, F.L.A., De Paula, E.V. & Annichino-Bizzacchi, J.M. Genetic variations in sites of affinity between FVIII and LRP1 are not associated with high FVIII levels in venous thromboembolism. Sci. Rep. 5, 9246; DOI:10.1038/srep09246 (2015).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

Related documents

responsibility is, like in any therapeutic work; it's up to the therapist to actually provide the safety net, and in the same way I'd argue it's up to the staff to do that"

 Fuller,  Rosenbach  Librarian,  for  generous  assistance..  Burgess  through  genealogical

The fact that, in all comparisons, scores obtained based on five to seven categories performed at least as well and often slightly better than did scores based on more

For the interaction effect of game type * favorite game on the mean absolute value of hand velocity, participants who chose the competitive game as their favorite had a higher

bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; CDM, chemically defined medium; DMEM, Dulbecco ’ s modified Eagle ’ s medium; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent-based assay;

Enterprise Data Quality Management Service (EDQMS) that builds out existing deployed infrastructure to provide a vendor-neutral data quality metrics database, a data quality

The purpose of PRA is to enable NGO workers, stakeholders (e.g. government officials) and local people to work together to plan development projects that are relevant to the

The significance of performing the research project was to successfully treat the SDIW using an EGSB-sidestream/external MBR technology design. The study aimed to assist