• No results found

Assistive Technology and PEIMS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Assistive Technology and PEIMS"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Assistive Technology and PEIMS 

SELN September 2009 

Kathy Clapsaddle, M.S., CCC‐SLP 

(

[email protected]

)  

    Assistive Technology Underreported in PEIMS  2006‐07:  • 487,000 identified special education students in Texas (10.6% of total students)  • Only 46,078 students were coded in PEIMS as receiving Assistive Technology  • 9% of special education students  • 1% of total students    Why is AT Underreported?  • Districts may not recognize everything that falls under the definition of AT   • Accurate information may not be given to the PEIMS clerks for coding  • Software programs used by districts to collect data incorrectly imply that the AT  indicator should only be coded positively if it is delivered as a related service    PEIMS E0997 Assistive Tech Indicator‐Code  ASSISTIVE‐TECH‐INDICATOR‐CODE indicates whether the student receiving special education  and related services received, or is scheduled to receive, an assistive technology device or  service during the current school semester.   "Assistive technology device" means any item, piece of equipment, or product system, whether  acquired commercially off the shelf, modified, or customized, that is used to increase, maintain,  or improve the functional capabilities of children with disabilities.   The term does not include a medical device that is surgically implanted or the replacement of  such device.  

(2)

"Assistive technology service" means any service that directly assists a child with a disability in  the selection, acquisition, or use of an assistive technology device. The term includes: a) the  evaluation of the needs of a child with a disability, including a functional evaluation of the child  in the child's customary environment; b) purchasing, leasing, or otherwise providing for the  acquisition of assistive technology devices by children with disabilities; c) selecting, designing,  fitting, customizing, adapting, applying, maintaining, repairing, or replacing assistive technology  devices; d) coordinating and using other therapies, interventions, or services with assistive  technology devices, such as those associated with existing education and rehabilitation plans  and programs; e) training or technical assistance for a child with a disability or, if appropriate,  that child's family; and f) training or technical assistance for professionals (including individuals  providing education or rehabilitation services), employers, or other individuals who provide  services to, employ, or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of  children with disabilities.   Assistive technology devices and/or services must be made available if required as part of a  child’s special education, as a related service, or as supplementary aids and services. (See 34  CFR §§300.5‐300.6 and 19 TAC §89.1050.)    So, what is AT?  • Some items originally designed as AT Tools  • Many common tools that can be considered AT   • AT is required by a student and written into his IEP 

Is that item is required in order for the student to receive FAPE? 

  REMEMBER:  Assistive Technology must be CONSIDERED at every ARD  1. Review PLAFFP and Evaluation Data  2. Develop goals and objectives  3. Determine task that are difficult or impossible for student  4. Determine if AT devices or services are required       

(3)

Coding AT in PEIMS  • Should be coded “1” if the student is receiving or is scheduled to receive an AT device or  service when the snapshot data is collected   • Can include adaptive equipment provided by related service professionals  • Can be low or high tech  • Services can include AT evaluations and should be included if scheduled during the fall  semester when snapshot data is collected    Improving AT PEIMS Reporting  1. Increase awareness of the definition of AT devices and services and when to be coded  2. Determine if the coding sheets given to PEIMS clerks accurately contains the AT  indicator  3. Determine if the software program used by the district accurately collects the AT data.      

(4)

To: Special Education Director Addressed

From: Kirk Behnke, Senior Education Specialist and

Lead Facilitator, Texas Assistive Technology Network Date: April 29, 2008

Re: PEIMS Data Standard for Assistive Technology

In Texas, student information is collected by the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS). The PEIMS indicator for Assistive Technology (AT) is being significantly under-reported. In 2006-2007 data reported by the Texas Education Agency (TEA), Texas had approximately 4,600,000 students in public schools. Approximately 487,000 were identified as special education students, which is approximately 10.6% of the total. In 2006-2007, only 46,078 students were coded in PEIMS as receiving AT devices and/or services. This number is nine percent of the special education population but only one percent of the total number of students.

Why is the AT indicator being under-reported? There are several factors which may

contribute to the problem. First, districts may not recognize all of the items and services that fall under the definition of AT devices and services and may not be “taking credit” for them. Second, accurate information may not be given to the PEIMS clerks for coding into the software system that is used. And, third, some of the software programs used by districts to collect data for PEIMS imply that the AT indicator should only be coded positively if it is delivered as a related service, which is not correct.

For PEIMS data collection, a 163 Student Data – Special Education record must be reported for each student receiving special education or related services. The record may be

accessed at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/peims/standards/weds/index.html?r163.

The data element EO997 Assistive Technology is reported on the 163 record and is defined in the PEIMS Data Standards. The PEIMS definition of AT devices and services is the same as in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA 2004). The data element may be accessed at

(5)

Code table CO88 is the participation code used for the AT indicator. The AT indicator should be coded “0” if the student is not receiving AT devices and /or services. The AT indicator should be coded “1” if the student is receiving devices and/or services. The data element may be accessed at

http://www.tea.state.tx.us/peims/standards/weds/index.html?c088.

The AT indicator should be coded “1” if the student is receiving or is scheduled to receive an AT device or service when the snapshot data is collected. Based on the definition of AT, items range from low to high tech; and, if low tech items are used by a student and are included in the IEP, the AT indicator should be coded “1.” AT devices can also include adaptive equipment provided by related service professionals. Services can include AT evaluations, which if scheduled during the fall semester when snapshot data is collected should also be included. The rule of thumb to remember is that if the ARD Committee determines that a student requires an AT device or service and it is included in the IEP, the AT participation code should be coded “1.”

In order to increase the accuracy of the data being collected, district special education administrators and personnel are asked to evaluate how the data are collected and reported in their districts.

Action items for the districts might include:

1. Increase awareness of district staff of the definition of AT devices and services and when it is to be coded.

2. Determine if the coding sheets used to give data to the PEIMS clerks accurately contains the AT indicator.

3. Determine if the software program used by the district accurately collects the AT data. Some software programs imply that the data would only be coded “1” if AT is provided as a related service which is not correct. If this is the case either work with the software developers to correct the item or devise a work-around such as training staff to code the AT indicator “1” if AT devices and/or services are provided.

For additional information on PEIMS, go to the TEA PEIMS Web page at

http://www.tea.state.tx.us/peims/. For more and specific information regarding AT data collection in PEIMS, and the forms referenced in this document, go to the Texas Assistive Technology Network Web site at http://www.texasat.net.

Thank you for your support and assistance in improving AT data collection in Texas to benefit students who use AT devices and services. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected].

The answer is 4.

Region 4 Education Service Center • 7145 West Tidwell Road • Houston, TX 77092-2096

Phone: 713-462-7708 • Fax · 713-744-6514 www.theansweris4.net

References

Related documents

Fast or you find vin information available and pricing are scanned for your vehicle history check report can include adding or a free carfax does the future.. Inspection can have

In this work, we conduct systematic experiments to analyze the performance im- plications of various HTTP/2 transport layer candidates on ABR streaming systems, particularly

Two landmark articles have evaluated perfusion CT in the context of rectal cancer assessment before CRT, with good response defined as tumor downstaging (21,23) , but to our

These barriers are due to gender roles (Mackenzie et al., 2004). Conforming to masculine norms can be detrimental to both psychological health and views toward seeking help

Its loca- tion was chosen to be close to the maxi- mum doming of isopycnals derived from the contours of dynamic topography and to align with the AR7E World Ocean

Technology Objective : Fully transition the major Tactical Littoral Sensor (TLS) capability into the Coastal Battlefield Reconnaissance and Analysis (COBRA) Post Mission

The impact of psychological abuse by an intimate partner on the mental health of pregnant women.. A Tiwari, KL Chan, D Fong, WC Leung, DA Brownridge, H Lam, B Wong, CM Lam, F Chau,

The following items are currently addressed: physico- chemistry of sodium coolant (physical and chemical properties), purification, corrosion, contamination, cleaning