• No results found

Michelle D. Sherman, Ph.D.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Michelle D. Sherman, Ph.D."

Copied!
36
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Michelle D. Sherman, Ph.D.

Director, OKC VAMC Family Mental Health Program Clinical Professor, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center,

(2)

Overview

1. Rationale for creation of REACH (Reaching out to Educate and Assist Caring, Healthy Families)

2. Selection of the evidence-based model to tailor

for PTSD and the VA

3. The REACH intervention & guiding principles 4. Participation, outcome, and satisfaction data

(3)

 75% of married/cohabiting OEF/OIF/OND veterans

referred for mental health evaluation at the VA had “some family problem” in the past week

 86% of veterans in a VA PTSD outpatient program

reported that PTSD was a source of family stress

(4)

 Partners of veterans with PTSD experience:

◦ High levels of caregiver burden

◦ High levels of overall psychiatric stress

 Compared to partners of veterans without PTSD,

they report:

◦ Lower relationship satisfaction ◦ Poorer psychological adjustment

Jordan et al., 1992; Calhoun et al., 2002; Beckham et al., 1996; Manguno-Mire et al., 2004

(5)

What About Family Involvement?

 79% of veterans expressed interest in greater family involvement in an outpatient VA PTSD program

 Over ¾ of live-in female partners of veterans with

PTSD rated getting couples/family therapy as very important in coping with PTSD in the family

 Conjoint treatment has been found to be effective

with other disorders (depression, substance abuse, schizophrenia)

Sherman et al., 2004; Batten et al, 2009; Beach et al., 1996; Jacobson et al., 1991; O’Farrell et al., 2006; Pfammatter et al., 2006

(6)

 ISTSS guidelines (Glynn, Drebing & Penk, 2009)

recommend family education/support for PTSD treatment

 VHA Handbook 1163.04 (July 1, 2011):

“Opportunities for family consultation and family education (e.g., SAFE Program) or family

psychoeducation (FPE) must be available for all veterans with serious mental illness…”

(7)

 Recommends: the DOD & VA “should institute

programs of research to evaluate the efficacy,

effectiveness, and implementation of all their PTSD screening, treatment, and rehabilitation services”

 Recommends that “couple and family

therapy…need to be rigorously evaluated…for efficacy, effectiveness, and cost” (pages 13-14).

(8)

 Manualized interventions originally created for

schizophrenia

 Goal: To equip families with the skills known to

reduce relapse and improve quality of life

 Emphasis on:

◦ Careful assessment

◦ Education about the illness ◦ Problem-solving

(9)

Meta analyses have concluded that benefits

of FPE for schizophrenia (when added to

standard pharmacotherapy) include:

◦ Reduced risk of relapse

◦ Remission of residual psychotic symptoms ◦ Enhanced social & family functioning

◦ Financial savings

** Findings are robust across cultures & sustainable across time.

** FPE is increasingly being used with a variety of other mental illnesses

(10)

Further, families who get FPE report:

◦ Less burden

◦ Decreased burnout & distress

◦ Fewer psychosomatic difficulties

(11)

 REACH = Reaching out to Educate and Assist

Caring, Healthy Families

 Chose McFarlane’s Multifamily Group Model due to

its strong evidence base & group format

 Modified for use in the VA system and for use with

PTSD

 Funded in 2005 as part of VACO Mental

(12)

 2 focus groups (veterans with SMI/PTSD and family

members)

 Goal = To better understand the needs and treatment

preferences of local families

 Findings:

◦ Veterans want family involvement to help family better understand their illness

◦ Family members want to be involved in veteran’s care

◦ Want evening services

(13)

Instillation of hope

Acknowledgment of PTSD as a real

phenomenon, yet empowering to make

positive changes

Focus on making small “1mm” changes

Treat veterans/support persons as “guests in

(14)

Emphasis on a “long-haul” mentality

(marathon rather than a sprint”)

Challenge by choice

REACH is not solely about/for the veterans

(15)

REACH PTSD Cohort Eligibility Criteria:

1) Primary diagnosis of PTSD

2) Residence within 90 miles of the VAMC

3) Adult family member/friend willing to

participate

Exclusion criteria:

1) Primary substance abuse disorder

2) Imminent danger to self or others

(16)

Elicit referrals from staff from numerous

programs:

“On-call” REACH psychologist meets with

interested veteran immediately after his/her

scheduled psychiatric appointment

◦ Motivational interviewing

◦ Emphasis on helping them achieve goals by involvement of family member

(17)

Phase One

:

Four weekly 45-minute single family

sessions

 Goals:

◦ Build rapport

◦ Assess precipitants & prodromal signs ◦ Begin to enhance coping strategies

◦ Define goals for this family

◦ Assess social history, family resources, support network

(18)

Goals:

o Psychoeducation about PTSD and its impact on family o Teach communication, problem-solving and coping

skills

o Relationship enhancement

(19)

 Structure:

◦ Check-in and follow-up on homework

◦ 20 minute didactic (interactive) presentation

◦ Split into break-out groups (veterans and

support persons separately) for 15-20 minute presentation/discussion

◦ Reconvene for entire class demonstration and in-session practice

(20)

1.

PTSD diagnosis, treatment, and effects on

relationships

2.

Managing anger/conflict effectively and

promoting wellness

3.

Communication skills

4.

Creating a low stress environment

5.

Depression and its impact on the family

(21)

Six monthly 90-minute multi-family groups

Practice with problem-solving process

Review and rehearse skills from Phase II

(22)

Entire curriculum and student workbook are

available for free download:

www.ouhsc.edu/REACHProgram

Special thanks to the SCMIRECC for funding

(23)

In addition to working with veterans with PTSD

and their families, we provide REACH to two

other diagnostic groups:

1. Affective Disorders (AD) including depressive disorders and bipolar disorder

2. Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD)

(24)

Have done “engage interviews” with 3,380

veterans to inform them about REACH

791 Veterans have participated in REACH

40 Nine-month PTSD cohorts

40 Nine-month Mood disorders cohorts

(25)

~95% of participants in clinical REACH

Program consent to voluntary REACH

evaluation

Veterans and family members complete a

battery of self-report measures at 4 times

◦ Baseline

◦ End of Phase 1

◦ End of Phase 2

(26)

Veterans (n=100) Family (n=96) Age (mean (IQR)) 55.8 (57-62) 52.7 (46-61) % Male 99% 4% % Married 87% 93% Race/ethnicity White 87% 82% Hispanic 4% 1% Black 8% 7% Native American 1% 8% Fischer et al., (2013)

(27)

Veterans (n=100) Family (n=96) Education Less than HS 5% 10% HS/GED 33% 38% Some college 35% 36% College graduate+ 18% 15% No information 9% 1% Relationship to veteran Spouse -.- 91% Parent -.- 3% Sibling -.- 4% Child -.- 2%

(28)

Veterans (n=100) Family (n=96) Measure Estimate Sign. Estimate Sign. PTSD Facts 6.29 <0.01 8.19 <0.01 PTSD Understanding 1.03 <0.01 1.11 <0.01 PTSD Coping 0.52 <0.01 0.95 <0.01 Empowerment1 1.84 0.01 18.2 <0.01

1 Rogers (veterans)/Koren (family) score sums * Repeated measures analysis (SAS Genmod)

(29)

Veterans (n=100) Family (n=96) Measure Estimate Sign. Estimate Sign. Social Support1 0.21 0.02 0.32 <0.01

Problem Solving2 - 0.02 NS 0.22 <0.01

Relationship

Satisfaction3 0.22 <0.01 5.13 <0.01

Symptoms (Brief Symptom Index)

Global Sx Index -0.19 <0.01 -0.20 <0.01 Depression -0.33 <0.01 -0.19 0.03

1 Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (avg.) 2 McCubbin Family Problem Solving Communication Scale (avg.)

3 Dyadic Adjustment Scale-7; distressed relationships only * Repeated measures analysis (SAS Genmod)

(30)

For family, increases in perceived ability to cope

and empowerment mediate

*

improvements in

social support and problem solving; increases in

perceived coping are associated with

improvements in BSI global symptom severity

and depression scores

(31)

 96% of participants said they were either “very satisfied” or

“mostly satisfied” with the REACH Project

 98% of participants were “very satisfied” or “mostly satisfied”

with their doctors

 96% of participants rated the quality of REACH as “excellent”

or “good”

 97% said REACH “helped a great deal” or “helped somewhat”  100% said they would recommend REACH to someone with a

(32)

Compared 12 months before starting

REACH to 12 months after finishing REACH

On average, veterans

used fewer VA

outpatient mental health services

in the 12

months AFTER REACH than they had in the

12 months before starting (

1.71

encounters/month versus

2.89

encounters

(33)

 Durham and the Bronx VA have done MFGs for

PTSD and TBI, incorporating some of REACH

(Perlick et al., 2013; Straits-Troster et al., 2013)

 Atlanta VA and Reno Vet Center are providing

REACH for PTSD

 Togas, Maine VA is applying for funding to

implement and evaluate REACH

 Honolulu VA / National Center for PTSD are using

the REACH curriculum for their research project with OEF/OEF PTSD couples

(34)

REACH-PTSD is a feasible, well-received,

effective family intervention for trauma

◦ Additional tool for clinicians (before, after or during EVTs for PTSD)

◦ Introduces norm of family involvement

◦ Assessing need for modifications to tailor REACH to appeal specifically to OEF/OIF-era veterans

(35)

Fischer, E.P., Sherman, M.D., Owen, R., & Han, X. (2013). Outcomes of

participation in the REACH multifamily group program for Veterans with PTSD and their families. In press.

 Sherman, M.D., Perlick, D., & Straits-Troster, K. (2013). Adapting the multifamily group model for treating Veterans with PTSD. Psychological

Services.

 Sherman, M.D., Fischer, E.P., Bowling, U.B., Dixon, L.B., Ridener, L., & Harrison, D. (2009). A new engagement strategy in a VA-based family psychoeducation program. Psychiatric Services, 60, 254-257.

 Sherman, M.D., Fischer, E.F. Sorocco, K., & McFarlane, W. (2009).

Adapting the multifamily group model to the Veterans Affairs system: The REACH program. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(6), 593-600.

(36)

Thank you!

Michelle D. Sherman, Ph.D.

405-456-5171

www.ouhsc.edu/REACHProgram

References

Related documents

Once the capacity of abatacept to suppress the in vitro proliferative response and the production of cytokines in PBMCs from healthy donors was established, we evalu- ated the

experiences, only less than five percent cases get reported to the management by the customers and hence according to him the crucial questions is “are human beings capable

How- ever, lymph node metastasis was observed only in carcinomas with reduced expression of E-cadherin, and their metastasis rate was significantly higher than that of carcinomas

Here, we assembled an interactome of IFITM1 and IFITM3 with known protein-protein interactions (PPIs) collected from publicly available databases and novel PPIs predicted

The aim of this study is to explore the role of social networks and work teams in the information behaviour of consulting engineers during task completion of an engineering

In an attempt to glean relationships based on seed size, total number of fibers per seed, and fibers per unit seed surface area, the data were correlated with relevant HVI and

P'?s etter  P'?s etter  is hereby canceling the award to your company of the project, is hereby canceling the award to your company of the project, II

Kawaguchi, in his review about cancer metastasis and related cell adhesion molecules, supports a hypothesis where the cancer cells create microinjury to the tissues