• No results found

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF HPTLC (HIGH PERFORMANCE THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY) METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF LORNOXICAM AND PARACETAMOL IN PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF HPTLC (HIGH PERFORMANCE THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY) METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF LORNOXICAM AND PARACETAMOL IN PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORM"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF HPTLC (HIGH

PERFORMANCE THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY) METHOD

FOR SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF LORNOXICAM AND

PARACETAMOL IN PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORM

Vyas Janki T.*, Dr. Zarna R. Dedania, Dr. S.M.Vijyendraswamy.

Bhagwan Mahavir College of Pharmacy (215) Sr. No. 149, Near Ashirwad Villa, New City Light Road, B/H Heena Bunglow’s, Vesu, Bharthana, Surat-395017, Gujarat.

ABSTRACT

Novel analytical Chromatographic HPTLC method has been developed in presented research work for simultaneous estimation of Lornoxicam and Paracetamol in pharmaceutical dosage form. HPTLC separation was also achieved on precoated silica gel 60GF254 using Acetone:Choloroform:Formic acid (4:4:2) as a mobile phase. Quantification was achieved with UV detection at 254 nm. The Rf value of Lornoxicam was found to be 0.47+0.02 and Rf value of Paracetamol was found to be 0.28+0.01. Calibration curve were linear in the range of 64-320 ng/spot for Lornoxicam and 2600-13000 ng/spot for Paracetamol. The assay results were found to be 98.85-101.32% for Lornoxicam and 99.84-101.18% for Paracetamol. Validation of the proposed method was carried out for its accuracy and precision

according to ICH guidelines. The methods were found to be rapid, simple, accurate and precise. Thus the present study gives excellent method for the determination of these two drugs in combined dosage formulation without their prior separation. They enable the simultaneous determination of Lornoxicam and Paracetamol in

tablet dosage form.

KEYWORDS: Lornoxicam, Paracetamol, HPTLC method, Validation.

INTRODUCTION

Lornoxicam belongs to the chemical class oxicams, which includes piroxicam, tenoxicam and meloxicam. It has non-steroidal anti‐inflammatory activity. It is used to treat inflammatory

Volume 4, Issue 5, 1688-1696. Research Article ISSN 2277– 7105

Article Received on 28 Feb 2015,

Revised on 19 March 2015, Accepted on 11 April 2015

*Correspondence for

Author

Vyas Janki T.

Bhagwan Mahavir College

of Pharmacy (215) Sr. No.

149, Near Ashirwad Villa,

New City Light Road, B/H Heena Bunglow’s, Vesu,

Bharthana, Surat-395017,

(2)

diseases of the joints, osteoarthritis, pain after surgery, and sciatica. It works by blocking the action of cyclooxygenase, an enzyme involved in the production of chemicals, including some prostaglandins in the body.[1,2] Chemically, Lornoxicam (LOR) is (3E)‐6‐ chloro‐3‐[hydroxyl(pyridine‐2‐ylamino)methylene]‐2‐methyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐4H‐thieno[2,3e][1, 2]thiazin‐4‐one‐1,1‐dioxide.[3]

Lornoxicam is not official in any Pharmacopoeia, but listed in the Merck Index.[4] Few analytical methods for determination of lornoxicam using UV method[5,6], Bio-analytical method[7], spectro-fluorimetry method[8], LC method[9,10] RP-HPLC[11,12], stability indicating HPLC method[13] have been reported.

[A] [B]

Chemical Structure of: [A] Lornoxicam, [B] Paracetamol.

Paracetamol is chemically 4-hydroxy acetanilide. It is a centrally and peripherally acting non-opioid analgesic and antipyretic.[14,15] Paracetamol is official in I.P[16], B.P[17] and USP.[18] Literature survey reveals that there are UV method[19,20] and HPTLC methods of Paracetamol with other drugs[21,22] have been reported for the estimation of Paracetamol in Pharmaceutical formulations.

Extensive Literature survey reveals that there are some UV method, i.e. simultaneous equation method and absorbance Q ratio method[23,24], HPTLC[25] RP- HPLC methods[26] have been reported for simultaneous estimation of Lornoxicam and Paracetamol in combined dosage form.

(3)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals and reagents: Lornoxicam and Paracetamol working standards were procured from Stallion Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad and Dolphin Pharmaceutical Ltd, Surat. The tested pharmaceutical marketed formulation (Lornoxi-P - Lornoxicam 8mg, paracetamol 325mg) was procured from commercial pharmacy. Solvents used were Acetone, Chloroform, Formic acid, etc. Reagents were of suitable analytical grade.

Marketed tablet preparation used was Trade Name Company

Name Dose

Batch Number

Manufactur ed Date

Expiry Date Lornoxi-P Hetero Labs

Limited

Lornoxicam-8mg,

Paracetamol-325mg. 3114306 May2014 Apr2016

Chromatographic Conditions

The instrument used for the estimation was Camag Linomat V semi-automatic sample applicator, Camag TLC scanner 3, CATS software for interpretation of the data, Hamilton syringe and Camag twin trough chamber. The Mobile phase was Acetone: Chloroform: Formic acid (4:4:2). Chamber saturation time was 20min. Detection was performed at 254nm.

Preparation of Standard Solution

Accurately weighed quantity of 16 mg of Lornoxicam and 650 mg of Paracetamol were transferred into 25 ml volumetric flask, dissolved in methanol, sonicated for 15 min and diluted up to mark with methanol. (Solution A: 640 µg/ml of Lornoxicam and 26000 µg/ml of Paracetamol) From this solution pipetting out 1ml and diluted it upto 10 ml with methanol to produce solution B. (Solution B: 64 µg/ml of Lornoxicam and 2600 µg/ml of paracetamol).

Determination of wavelength for measurement

From the working standard solution B 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 µl (64-320 ng/spot Lornoxicam and 2600-13000 ng/spot Paracetamol) were spotted on TLC plate under nitrogen stream using Linomat-V applicator. From Overlain spectra it was found that at 254 nm both the drug have considerable absorbance. Thus 254 nm was selected as wavelength for estimation of both the drug.

Preparation of Sample Solution

(4)

transferred to a 25 ml volumetric flask, dissolved, sonicated for 15 min and diluted up to mark with methanol. The solution was filtered through Whatmann filter paper no.42 and first few ml of filtrate were discarded. From above solution pipetting out 1 ml solution and diluted up to 10 ml with methanol. From this solution sample 2 μl was spotted on activated TLC plate. The plate is scanned and the detection wavelength is 254 nm for the both drugs and peak area is measured. The concentration of each drugs are determined by using straight line equations for each drug.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

The present study was aimed at development of rapid, convenient and cost effective HPTLC technique for determination of Lornoxicam and Paracetamol tablet dosage form. Various blends of solvent systems in varying proportions were tried as mobile phase. HPTLC separation was achieved on precoated silica gel 60GF254 using Acetone:Chloroform:Formic acid (4:4:2) as a mobile phase. The Rf value of Lornoxicam was found to be 0.47+0.02 and Rf value of Paracetamol was found to be 0.28+0.01, respectively with saturation time of 20 minutes. The selection of wave length was based on maximum absorbance for optimum sensitivity. Quantification was achieved with UV detection at 254 nm. Calibration curve were linear in the range of 64-320 ng/spot for Lornoxicam and 2600-13000 ng/spot for

Paracetamol with coefficient of correlation value 0.9963 and 0.9975 respectively. The assay results were found to be 98.85-101.32% for Lornoxicam and 99.84-101.18% for Paracetamol. The developed method was validated as per ICH Guidelines. Thus the present study gives excellent methods for the determination of these two drugs in combined dosage formulation. They enable the simultaneous determination of Lornoxicam and Paracetamol in tablet dosage form.

VALIDATION OF METHOD

1. Linearity and Range: The linearity response was determined by analyzing 6 independent levels of calibration curve in the range of 64-320 ng/spot for Lornoxicam and 2600-13000 ng/spot for Paracetamol. Peak areas of each concentration were measured and plot of peak area vs. concentration were plotted. The straight line equation was determined.

Table 1: Calibration Parameters

Parameters LORNOXICAM PARACETAMOL

Linearity range (ng/spot) 64-320 2600-11353 Linearity equation y = 5.002x + 3029.9 y = 1.0419x + 8896.9

(5)

Figure 1: Selection Of Analytical Wavelength In Overlain Uv Absorption Spectra Of Lornoxicam (64-320 Ng/Spot) And Paracetamol (2600-13000 Ng/Spot)

Figure 2: 3d chromatogram of calibration curve of lornoxicam (64-320 ng/spot) and paracetamol (2600-13000 ng/spot).

2. ACCURACY (RECOVERY STUDY): The accuracy of the method was established using recovery technique i.e external standard addition method. The known amount of standard was added at three different levels to pre analyzed sample. Each determination was performed in triplicate. The result of recovery study is presented in table 2.

Table 2: Accuracy Results Tablet content taken

eq. to (ng/spot)

Standard added (API spiked)

Total drugs recovered (ng/spot)

% Recovery of Standard added

LOR PCM LOR PCM LOR PCM LOR PCM

64 2600 - 63.03 2632.67 - -

64 2600 80% 115.23 4676.25 100.05 99.81

64 2600 100% 127.58 5212.63 99.34 100.48

[image:5.595.136.460.72.242.2] [image:5.595.135.462.308.489.2]
(6)

3. LOD & LOQ

Limit of Detection (LOD) AND Limit of Quantification (LOQ) were calculated and results found as per table 3.

Table 3: Lod & Loq

Parameters Lornoxicam Paracetamol LOD (ng/spot) 20.37 821.72 LOQ (ng/spot) 61.75 2490.06

4. PRECISION: The precision expressed as standard deviation or relative standard deviation.

Intraday precision: Pure API of Lornoxicam and Paracetamol were taken in a ratio was analyzed at three levels of concentration for three times in a day. Peak Areas of the solutions were measured. The % RSD for Lornoxicam and Paracetamol were found.

Interday precision: Pure API of Lornoxicam and Paracetamol were taken in a ratio was analyzed at three levels of concentration for three consecutive days. Peak Areas of the solutions were measured, % RSD for Lornoxicam and Paracetamol were found.

Table 4: Precision Study

Drug Concentration [µg/ml]

Intra-day Amount found

[µg/ml n=3]

% R.S.D.

Inter-day Amount found

[µg/ml n=3]

% R.S.D.

LOR 128 99.67±0.42 0.42 99.70±0.72 0.73

192 100.79±0.61 0.60 100.00±1.05 1.05

256 100.60±0.51 0.51 100.59±0.52 0.52

PCM 5200 100.23±0.43 0.43 100.36±0.71 0.71

7800 100.39±0.55 0.55 100.48±0.51 0.51

10400 99.81±0.15 0.15 99.44±0.63 0.63

5. SPECIFICITY: Specificity is carried out by taking peak purity of standard and sample of each drug and standard and sample peak spectra were overlain to check specificity of each individual drug peak and co-relation values (r) were found to be > 0.9995.

ANALYSIS OF MARKETED FORMULATION: BY HPTLC METHOD

(7)

Table 5: Analysis Of Marketed Formulation Tablet content

taken eq. to (ng/spot)

Amount found (ng/spot)

(n=3)

Assay (% Estimated) (n=3)

LOR PCM LOR PCM LOR PCM

128 5200

129.70 5191.76

98.85-101.32% 99.84 -101.18% 126.52 5261.5

127.86 5204.20

Figure 3: Peak Purity Corelation Spectra Of Lornoxicam And Paracetamol

Figure 4: Hptlc Chromatogram Of Tablet Formulation Of Lornoxicam And Paracetamol

CONCLUSION

[image:7.595.91.488.451.675.2]
(8)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are grateful to Stallion Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad and Dolphin Pharmaceutical Ltd., Surat, for providing gift samples of Lornoxicam and Paracetamol.

REFERENCES

1. Rang HP, and Dale MM. Rang and Dale’s Pharmacology; 6th Edn; Elsevier ltd, 2007; 226-247.

2. Goyal RK, Balaraman R, and Burnade MD. Derasari and Gandhi elements of Pharmacology; 6th Edn; B.S.Shah Prakashan, Ahmadabad, 1997; 340-345.

3. http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/db06725 (Accessed on 18th august 2014)

4. Merck Index ‐ an encyclopedia of chemicals and drugs and biologicals, 13th edition, 5612. 5. Sahoo SK, Gir RK, Patil SV, Behera AR and Mohapatra R, “Development of Ultraviolet

Spectrophotometric method for Analysis of Lornoxicam in solid dosage form.” Trop J.

Pharm. Research., 2012; 11(2): 269-273.

6. Ramya NK, “Method Development and validation of lornoxicam in pharmaceutical dosage form by using UV-Visible Spectrophotometry.” Int J. Pharm. Bio. Arch., 2012; 3(4): 1012-1016.

7. Soni B, Khan F, Bhandari A and Sharma S, “Determination of Lornoxicam in Plasma by UV Spectroscopy.” Pharmacophore., 2011; 2(4): 239-243.

8. Suganthi A and Ravi TK, “Determination of Lornoxicam in Pharmaceutical formulation by Quenchofluorimetric Techchnique.” Int. J.A.PS.BMS, 2013; 2(1): 21-25.

9. Young Hoon Kin, Hye Young Ji, Eun‐Seok Park, Soo‐Wan Chae, Hye Sik Lee: LC‐Tandem Mass Spectrometric determination of Lornoxicam in human plasma,. Archieves of Pharmacal Research., 2007; 30(7): 905‐910.

10.Kiran R. Patil, S. Devanand B. Shinde, Vipul P. Rane, Jaiprakash N, Sangshetti: Stability indicating LC method for analysis of Lornoxicam in dosage form. Chromatographia., 2009; 69: 1001‐ 1005.

11.Kumar PK, Kumar DP, Kandhasamy MR and Siva KT, “RP-HPLC Development and validation for estimation of Lornoxicam in bulk and its solid dosaga form.” Int. J. Pharm.

Chem. Sci., 2012; 2: 541-545.

(9)

13.Bhatt PK, Hamrapurkar PD and Shigwan HS, “Development and validation of stability indicating RP-HPLC method for Lornoxicam in Bulk Drug.” Int. J. Res. Pharm. Biomed. Sci., 2013; 4(3): 959-966.

14.Anthony CM., David O. and Brian W., Clarke’s Analysis of Drugs and Poisons, 3rd Edn; Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 2004; 2: 1391-1393.

15.http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00316, (Accessed on 27th September, 2014)

16.Indian Pharmacopoeia, Govt. of India, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Indian Pharmacopoeial Commission, Ghaziabad, 2010; 3: 1859-1862.

17.TheBritishPharmacopoeia, 2007; edition, Vol.II: 1575.

18.USP‐NFAsianedition, 2007; 2: 1269.

19.Behra S, Ghanty S, Fahad A and Banerjee SS, “UV –Visible spectrophotometric method development and validation of assay of Paracetamol tablet formulation.” J. Anal. Bioanal.

Tech., 2012; 3(6): 1000151.

20.Buddha RS and Pradhanang R, “Spectrophotometric method for determination of Paracetamol.” J. Nepal Chem. Soc., 2009; 24: 39-44.

21.Deepali G and Pandurang D, “Simultaneous Estimation of Tramadol Hydrochloride and

Paracetamol by UV Spectrophotometric Method from Tablet Formulation”, Int. J. PharmTech. Res., 2010; 2(2): 1119-1123.

22.Baheti KG, Shamim S, Shah N and Dehghan MH, “Validated simultaneous estimation of Paracetamol and Etoricoxib in bulk and tablet by HPTLC method, Inter. J. Res. PharmaCeut. Biomed. Sci., 2011; 2(2): 672-675.

23.Banerjee T, Banerjee B, Jain P, Shulka G and Banerjee A, “Spectrophotometric estimation of Lornoxicam and Paracetamol tablet dosage form using Hydrotropoic Solubilizing Agent.” Int. J. Chem. Tech., 2012; 4(1): 232-239.

24.Jain N, Jain K, “Spectrophotometric Quantitative Estimation of Lornoxicam and Paracetamol in Bulk Drugs and Dosage Form” Der Pharma Chemica, 2010; 2(6):

165-170.

25.Raja T and Rao AL, “Validated Hptlc method for Simultaneous Quantification of Paracetamol and Lornoxicam in Bulk drug and pharmaceutical formulation.” Int. J. Pharm. Biomed. Res., 2012; 3(3): 162-166.

26.Borisagar SL, Patel HU, Patel AN and Patel CN, “A Validated HPLC method for estimation of Lornoxicam and Paracetamol in their combined tablet dosage form.” Int. J.

Figure

Figure 2: 3d chromatogram of calibration curve of lornoxicam (64-320 ng/spot) and paracetamol (2600-13000 ng/spot)
Figure 4: Hptlc Chromatogram Of Tablet Formulation Of Lornoxicam And  Paracetamol

References

Related documents

The development of the Track and Connect program from this inception included the initial application of an academic buoyancy tool, the Motivation and Engagement Scale,

Optimal management of asymptomatic women with normal cervices and reports of atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance or low-grade squamous

The UNRWA/UNESCO education programme included in 1983 general education for some 336,207 chil- dren at elementary and preparatory levels in 651 UNRWA/UNESCO schools; vocational

In our study, we showed that at 2 weeks after ACLT surgery, rats in the model group had significantly higher serum levels of COMP when compared to rats in the control group

Comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with autogenous bone chips and PLIF with cage for treatment of double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis. Clin

The study ’ s primary objective was to demonstrate the ability of the harmonic scalpel (H) to reduce intra- operative conversion rates compared to the conventional monopolar

• The cattle that showed clinical signs before day 16 (early cases) stayed for a long time in the herd, and were culled only after a few days, while cattle that became sick later