INTERACT is co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
SUMMARY OF THE NETWORKING AND LEARNING EVENT FOR
COMMUNICATION MANAGERS IN CBC PROGRAMMES
INTERACT Points Valencia, Viborg and Vienna 25-26 May 2009 | Vienna
NEEDS ASSESSMENT EXERCISE
I. GROUP DISCUSSIONS
1. Internal communicationCurrent challenges Possible actions Who should/could be in charge?
Identify clear roles and expertise Communication between MA and JTS
- Team building and coordination
meeting
- Improve CP1 into an action plan
- Written rules of procedure
- Joint materials
JTS/MA
Coordinate programme comm. strategy and regional comm. strategy
JTS/MA Coordinate different countries participating
in one programme (incl. management of political pressure)
JTS/MA/MSC
2. Synergies between programme and project communication
Current challenges Possible actions Who should/could be in charge?
Lack of project communication
(quantitative and qualitative) Help project communicate better JTS/MA INTERACT?
Need to give a positive image of ETC - Highlight project benefits for
citizens
- Organise thematic
capitalisation events
INTERACT to coordinate thematic events
Lack of internal communication within
project partnerships LP seminars not sufficient – propose use of wiki tools by the
projects
JTS – LPs Lack of qualitative projects – difficult to
attract new projects applicants
3. Joint ETC branding – synergies between programmes
Current challenges Possible actions Who should/could be in charge?
Cooperation and synergies between
programmes (European added-value) Working groups (at national level, e.g. with Objective 1-2 MA/JTS INTERACT
1 CP = Communication Plan
programmes) and at EU level Information and initiatives towards MSCs
No single name (ETC, INTERREG IVA, OP,
CBC, Objective 3 etc) Use just the EU flag (no name) Promote the current name (ETC) EC
Lack of awareness and knowledge of ETC in the media and general public (at national and EU level)
- Train the media as
disseminators to the general public
- Provide with simple and basic
information on what is ETC – “ETC for dummies”?
INTERACT?
No joint message at EU level Identify a joint message at EU
level, through a centralised agency INTERACT and programmes
4. Evaluation and monitoring of communication
Current challenges Possible actions Who should/could be in charge?
Indicators Skip indicators or concentrate on
few core indicators
MC/EC
The 2010 evaluation exercise - Organise an event to prepare
the 2010 evaluation
- Quality assessment/quality
evaluation: outsourcing
- Organise a peer evaluation
(evaluation made by other programmes) based on common checklist developed by INTERACT
Programmes and INTERACT
Project monitoring Control project outputs in progress
reports
JTS Impact evaluation – how to differentiate
different levels of impact (project/programme/EU levels)
3
II. RESULTS OF THE WRITTEN NEEDS ANALYSIS AMONG THE
SEMINAR PARTICIPANTS
9
Almost all participants (90%) are interested in regular physical meetings with the ETCcommunity, but most of them stressed that one meeting per year is sufficient due to time
and budget constraints.
9
90% are interested in geographical meetings (per zone) as well as CBC-level events, whereas only 50% favour Europe-wide events.9
95% of the participants are interested in keeping in touch with their communication colleagues across Europe using e-mail, forums, video conference or newsletters.9
95% of the participants would like to attend the next INTERACT event. Suggestions for topics include evaluation issues (50% of the participants mentioned this topic explicitly!); project communication activities; joint communication tools and capitalisation.9
Not all participants answered the question whether they would be interested in joint branding, but of those who did, 80% are in favour. The two main challenges are to develop ajoint message for all INTERREG programmes at EU level (cf. results of group discussions)
and to communicate successful projects.
9
Positive feedback was given to the suggestion to have INTERACT organise a major Europeanevent on 20 Years of Territorial Cooperation. Concrete suggestions range from organising
a major fair for INTERREG programmes, to holding a series of smaller events at regional level to reach a more general public. Content-wise the event should concentrate on achievements and success stories of ETC so far.
9
Some programmes are interested in joint activities to save time and resources. Appropriate topics could be training seminars for beneficiaries (on communication or other issues).MEDIA STRATEGY DISCUSSION
9 Take benefit of VIPs such as Commissioner Danuta Hübner – a good way to attract the media 9 Topics for the next Panorama issues:
o The Baltic Sea Strategy
o Communicating Regional Policy
o Environmental aspects in the Cohesion Policy
9 Focus on flagship projects and human interest stories is recommended, i.e. how did a citizen benefit from a project?
9 Why not use creative ways of selling your story? Good example: bike trip with journalists visiting all ERDF project sites in and around Toulouse (FR).
9 Successful projects often have a political backup – to be considered!
9 Programmes need to cooperate with the project on communication activities – and not just inform about rules and requirements and control compliance with such rules.
FACTS AND FIGURES
9 A Sunday’s edition of a national newspaper contains more information than average people received in a whole lifetime in the XVIIth century. 9 Europe has the largest number of specialist media
in the world. These specialist publications (also called trade media) are important source of information for generalist media, in particular national ones.
9 In 2008 the web ads revenues were for the first time superior to traditional media web revenues. 9 Train Communication Managers
to tell stories. They may then
either do editorial work themselves or pay a freelance journalists to sell their messages (this seems to be a reasonable investment).
9 Is there a need or not for a programme to be visible in
national media/newspapers? In
general this can be a good thing but programmes should not invest too much time and energy in such media, as the likeliness to be published is rather low.
Focus on local and regional media is more important. 9 Use of video:
o Prices vary a lot depending on production quality needed, on the use of a
professional camera team, travel, length, copyrights for image and sound etc. The reflection phase (What message do we want to pass? To whom? What for?) is essential. The post-production phase as well, e.g. choice of images, sound, cuts etc.
o Programmes could organise a video competition for their projects or cooperate with
universities to reduce costs.
9 Use of new media and IT: revise your communication plan/budget on an annual basis if needed.
9 Diverse opinions on the usefulness of blogs and social media (Facebook, Twitter etc…). The best advice to give is that you get acquainted with these to then evaluate whether they make sense for your communication work or a just a waste of time!
Communication needs to be a win-win interaction
between programmes and projects!
5
MEDIA OUTREACH WORKSHOP
TIPS AND TOOLS
9 Don´t try to communicate a communication product (e.g.: “we have developed a nice brochure”) but concrete project outputs:
o Start with one example, then mention to the journalist that you have other similar
stories to tell (e.g. on different projects working on the same theme)
o Tell the journalist the story first, only after that you can tell them about the
programme and EU-funding
9 The “elevator pitch” exercise: exercise yourself to tell your story within a very short time (the time to step in and out of an elevator)....
9 Imagine a helicopter for your communications work: try not to be too close to the topic/programme/project!
9 Identify your audiences:
Audience What does your audience
think NOW?
What should your audience think at the END of your programme/project?
9 The right timing for media work: Mondays, Summer break.
EU MEDIA – THE PLACES TO BE
9 The European Voice (http://www.europeanvoice.com) is read by 70% of the MEPs, it is the most influence EU magazine in Brussels and has a very good reputation.
9 Euractiv (http://www.euractiv.com/en) only exists in an electronic version but it is also very influential. Its interest also lies in the fact that it has both a European edition and regional editions/networks. Also check out their Blogactiv (http://blogactiv.eu)! 70% of journalists nowadays use blogs as a source information.
9 EU-Observer (http://euobserver.com) is also an online edition that is updated twice a day.
It is also well-respected in Brussels circles.
9 The Parliament Magazine (http://www.theparliament.com) and its sister publication Regional review must be considered carefully, especially as regards their prices for an advertorial (they sell editorials/ advertisement). Often they do not have the desired impact, however, the Regional Review is media partner of the Open Days and it may be worth investing in an article for this event.
9 Start preparations for next year’s 20 Years of Territorial Cooperation Event
9 Keep you informed about the next Europe-wide or CBC communication event with
focus on evaluation to take place at the beginning of 2010
9 This is a non-exhaustive list!
CONCLUSIONS – WHAT DO WE TAKE ONBOARD?
9 The implementation of the communication strategy implies the selection of few measures with the most expected impact and the best ratio investment (time and budget) / result in terms of visibility and awareness-raising.
9 Make use of project results for programme communication activities/messages!
9 The language issue affects most CBC programmes: time-consuming to translate all communication products into the different programme languages, and additionally into English. A possible solution is to require from each project a brief project summary in English as part of the application form (as experienced in the IVA Programme Öresund-Kattegat-Skagerrak).
9 90% of press releases end up in the bin, so evaluate whether they make sense for your programme. Maybe try out the new bullet point format press release.
9 Pay attention to photos and try to use unusual angles (instead of meaningless group pictures).
9 It is always interesting to compare communication strategies, activities and issues with other programmes.
INTERACT ACTION PLAN/FOLLOW UP
USEFUL LINKS
9 European Institutional Style Guide: http://publications.europa.eu/code/en/en-000100.htm
9 Survey Monkey (for online surveys - this is an example, other similar websites also offer such services): http://www.surveymonkey.com/
9 EUTube on Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/eutube
9 “INTERREG” on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interreg
9 How to add RRS Feeds – Video explanation from Youtube: