• No results found

Eulerian integral associated with product of two multivariable I-functions, a class of polynomials and the multivariable -function defined by Nambisan II

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Eulerian integral associated with product of two multivariable I-functions, a class of polynomials and the multivariable -function defined by Nambisan II"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Eulerian integral associated with product of two multivariable I-functions, a class

of polynomials and the multivariable -function defined by Nambisan II

1 Teacher in High School , France E-mail : [email protected]

ABSTRACT

The present paper is evaluated a new Eulerian integral associated with the product of two multivariable I-functions defined by Prasad [1] a generalized Lauricella function , a class of multivariable polynomials and Multivariable I-function defined by Nambisan [2] with general arguments . We will study the case concerning the multivariable H-function defined by Srivastava et al [7] and Srivastava-Daoust polynomial [4].

Keywords: Eulerian integral, multivariable I-function, generalized Lauricella function of several variables, multivariable H-function, generalized hypergeometric function, class of polynomials

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 33C60, 82C31

1. Introduction

In this paper, we evaluate a new Eulerian integral of most general characters associated with the products of two multivariable I-functions defined by Prasad [1] , a expansion serie of multivariable I-function defined by Nambisan et al [2] and a class of polynomials with general arguments.

First time, we define the multivariable -function by :

(1.1)

(1.2)

where , , are given by :

(2)

(1.4)

Serie representation

If

,

then

(1.5)

This result can be proved on computing the residues at the poles :

(1.6)

We may establish the the asymptotic expansion in the following convenient form :

,

,

where : and

We will note (1.7)

The multivariable I-function of r-variables is defined in term of multiple Mellin-Barnes type integral :

(3)

(1.9)

The defined integral of the above function, the existence and convergence conditions, see Y,N Prasad [1]. Throughout the present document, we assume that the existence and convergence conditions of the multivariable I-function.

The condition for absolute convergence of multiple Mellin-Barnes type contour (1.9) can be obtained by extension of the corresponding conditions for multivariable H-function given by as :

, where

(1.10)

where

The complex numbers are not zero.Throughout this document , we assume the existence and absolute convergence conditions of the multivariable I-function.

We may establish the the asymptotic expansion in the following convenient form :

,

,

where : and

Condider a second multivariable I-function defined by Prasad [1]

(4)

(1.12)

The defined integral of the above function, the existence and convergence conditions, see Y,N Prasad [1]. Throughout the present document, we assume that the existence and convergence conditions of the multivariable I-function.

The condition for absolute convergence of multiple Mellin-Barnes type contour (1.9) can be obtained by extension of the corresponding conditions for multivariable H-function given by as :

where ,

(1.13)

where

The complex numbers are not zero.Throughout this document , we assume the existence and absolute convergence conditions of the multivariable I-function.

We may establish the the asymptotic expansion in the following convenient form :

,

,

where : and

where : and

Srivastava and Garg [5] introduced and defined a general class of multivariable polynomials as follows

= (1.14)

The coefficients are arbitrary constants, real or complex.

2. Integral representation of generalized Lauricella function of several variables

(5)

(2.1)

where the contours are of Barnes type with indentations, if necessary, to ensure that the poles of

are separated from those of . The above result (1.23) can be easily established by an appeal to the calculus of residues by calculating the residues at the poles of

In order to evaluate a number of integrals of multivariable I-function, we first establish the formula

(2.2)

where

(6)

(2.3)

Here the contour are defined by starting at the point and terminating at the

point with and each of the remaining contour run from to

(2.2) can be easily established by expanding by means of the formula :

(2.4)

integrating term by term with the help of the integral given by Saigo and Saxena [3, page 93, eq.(3.2)] and applying the definition of the generalized Lauricella function [5, page 454].

3. Eulerian integral

In this section , we note :

;

(3.1)

(3.2)

(3.3)

(3.4)

(3.5)

(3.6)

(3.7)

(7)

(3.9)

(3.10)

(3.11)

(3.12)

(3.13)

(3.14)

(3.15)

(3.16) j

(3.17) j

(3.18)

(3.19)

(8)

(3.21)

(3.22)

(3.23)

(3.24)

(9)

(3.25)

(3.25)

We obtain the I-function of variables. The quantities

and are defined above.

Provided that

(A ) ,

(B) ;

;

( ;

( ;

(10)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(11)

(H) (I)

The multiple series occuring on the right-hand side of (3.25) is absolutely and uniformly convergent.

Proof

To prove (3.24), first, we express in serie the multivariable I-function defined by Nambisan et al [2] with the help of (1.5), a class of multivariable polynomials defined by Srivastava in serie with the help of (1.14), the I-functions of r-variables and s-variables defined by Prasad [1] in terms of Mellin-Barnes type contour integral with the help of (1.8) and (1.11) respectively. Now collect the power of Now collect the power of with with

and collect the power of

and collect the power of with with . Use the equations (2.2) and. Use the equations (2.2) and

(2.3) and express the result in Mellin-Barnes contour integral. Interpreting the

(2.3) and express the result in Mellin-Barnes contour integral. Interpreting the dimensional Mellin- dimensional Mellin-Barnes integral in multivariable I-function defined by Prasad [1], we obtain the equation (3.24).

Barnes integral in multivariable I-function defined by Prasad [1], we obtain the equation (3.24).

Remarks Remarks

If a)

If a) ; b) ; b) , we obtain the similar formulas that, we obtain the similar formulas that (3.25) with the corresponding simplifications.

(3.25) with the corresponding simplifications.

4. Particular cases

a) If

a) If , t, the multivariable I-function defined by Prasad reduces to multivariable H-function definedhe multivariable I-function defined by Prasad reduces to multivariable H-function defined by Srivastava et al [7] and we obtain :

(12)

(4.1)

(4.1)

under the same notations and conditions that (3.25) with

under the same notations and conditions that (3.25) with

b)

b) If If = = (4.2) (4.2)

then the general class of multivariable polynomial

then the general class of multivariable polynomial reduces to generalized Lauricella function reduces to generalized Lauricella function

defined by Srivastava et al [4]. We have

(13)
(14)

(4.3)

(4.3)

under the same conditions and notations that (3.25)

under the same conditions and notations that (3.25)

where

where , , is defined by (4.2) is defined by (4.2)

Remark:

By the following similar procedure, the results of this document can be extented to product of any finite number of

By the following similar procedure, the results of this document can be extented to product of any finite number of

multivariable I-functions defined by Prasad [1] and a class of multivariable polynomials defined by Srivastava et al [5].

multivariable I-functions defined by Prasad [1] and a class of multivariable polynomials defined by Srivastava et al [5].

5. Conclusion

In this paper we have evaluated a generalized Eulerian integral involving the product of two multivariable I-functions defined by Prasad [1],a expansion of multivariable I-function defined by Nambisan et al [2] and a class of multivariable polynomials defined by Srivastava et al [4] with general arguments. The formulae established in this paper is very general nature. Thus, the results established in this research work would serve as a key formula from which, upon specializing the parameters, as many as desired results involving the special functions of one and several variables can be obtained.

REFERENCES

(15)

[2] Prathima J. Nambisan V. and Kurumujji S.K. A Study of I-function of Several Complex Variables, International Journalof Engineering Mathematics Vol(2014) , 2014 page 1-12

[3] Saigo M. and Saxena R.K. Unified fractional integral formulas for the multivariable H-function I. J.Fractional Calculus 15 (1999), page 91-107.

[4] Srivastava H.M. and Daoust M.C. Certain generalized Neumann expansions associated with Kampé de Fériet function. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser A72 = Indag Math 31(1969) page 449-457.

[5] Srivastava H.M. And Garg M. Some integral involving a general class of polynomials and multivariable H-function. Rev. Roumaine Phys. 32(1987), page 685-692.

[6] Srivastava H.M. and Karlsson P.W. Multiple Gaussian Hypergeometric series. Ellis.Horwood. Limited. New-York, Chichester. Brisbane. Toronto , 1985.

[7] H.M. Srivastava and R.Panda. Some expansion theorems and generating relations for the H-function of several complex variables. Comment. Math. Univ. St. Paul. 24(1975), p.119-137.

Personal adress : 411 Avenue Joseph Raynaud Le parc Fleuri , Bat B

83140 , Six-Fours les plages Tel : 06-83-12-49-68 Department : VAR

Country : FRANCE

References

Related documents

Reasons for not pursuing teaching revolved around concerns pertaining to the graduates’ experiences, perceptions of other professions, changes in their

In determining the relevance of USC COEd’s curricular programs in meeting the needed manpower for regional and national development, an evaluation of its

Implementing learning using learning strategies with PBL as one of the alternatives in the learning of mathematics. With learning strategy and PBL learning achievement of

long as cross-sections are similar in their bank-to-bank coverage (i.e. all cross-sections extend.. Figure 7.24: Plot of probed hydraulic spline accuracy versus number of output

Total cation concentrations in the tissue water (A) and calculated osmotic pressure generated by K-f Na + Ca (B) for spring barley crops from the 1981 Hoosfield Continuous

Again, we found that women’s and men’s university education reduces the odds of divorce compared to all other levels of education (results not shown in table). In short, our

Testing null hypothesis - To investigate the null hypothesis, stating that there is no statistically significant relationship between participants' linguistic intelligence

190|58) the changes in carbon, nitrogen and organic P content of old arable soils over many years were too small to measure reliably. Moreover, these results