Acta Cryst.(2003). E59, o1951±o1952 DOI: 10.1107/S1600536803025704 Peter G. Jones C4H5NO3
o1951
organic papers
Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports Online
ISSN 1600-5368
N
-Hydroxysuccinimide
Peter G. Jones
Institut fuÈr Anorganische und Analytische Chemie, Technische UniversitaÈt Braunschweig, Postfach 3329, 38023 Braunschweig, Germany
Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]
Key indicators Single-crystal X-ray study
T= 133 K
Mean(C±C) = 0.002 AÊ
Rfactor = 0.041
wRfactor = 0.108
Data-to-parameter ratio = 11.2
For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.
#2003 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain ± all rights reserved
The molecule of the title compound, C4H5NO3, is planar
(mean deviation of non-H atoms 0.03 AÊ). The NÐC bond lengths are signi®cantly different [1.365 (2) and 1.392 (2) AÊ]. The C O group associated with the shorter NÐC bond accepts a classical intermolecular hydrogen bond from the hydroxy H atom.
Comment
N-Hydroxysuccinimide, (I), has found applications in the analysis of amines, with which it readily forms crystalline adducts. The structure of one of these, withp -chlorobenzyl-amine, was determined (Reck & Adam, 1977), and it was established that the amine is in the protonated form, while the hydroxy group is deprotonated. However, the structure of
N-hydroxysuccinimide itself has not previously been deter-mined; it is presented here.
The molecule is shown in Fig. 1; it is planar within a mean deviation (non-H atoms) of 0.03 AÊ. The most striking feature of the molecular dimensions is the large difference between the chemically equivalent bond lengths NÐC1 [1.365 (2) AÊ] and NÐC4 [1.392 (2) AÊ]. If this is accepted as genuine, one possible explanation would be delocalization of the lone pair at nitrogen preferentially in the direction of O1 [cf. the corresponding C O bond lengths of 1.224 (2) and 1.207 (2) AÊ]. This would be consistent with the fact that atom O1 accepts a classical intermolecular hydrogen bond from the OH group. The structures of the above-mentioned adduct and ofN-hydroxyphthalimide (Miaoet al., 1995) are available for comparison; in the former, the corresponding NÐC bond
Received 5 November 2003 Accepted 6 November 2003 Online 15 November 2003
Figure 1
lengths are 1.365 and 1.376 AÊ, and in the latter 1.384 (6) and 1.397 (8) AÊ. In each case, the ®rst bond length involves the C O group that accepts a classical hydrogen bond, whereas the latter C O group does not. The differences are, however, not signi®cant.
The classical hydrogen bond and one short CÐH O interaction connect the molecules to form ribbons parallel to theaaxis (Fig. 2).
Experimental
A commercial sample of the title compound (Aldrich) proved to contain single crystals.
Crystal data
C4H5NO3
Mr= 115.09
Orthorhombic,P212121
a= 5.4266 (8) AÊ
b= 7.2419 (12) AÊ
c= 12.445 (2) AÊ
V= 489.09 (13) AÊ3
Z= 4
Dx= 1.563 Mg mÿ3
MoKradiation Cell parameters from 3627
re¯ections
= 2.8±30.5
= 0.14 mmÿ1
T= 133 (2) K
Irregular tablet, colourless 0.300.250.10 mm
Data collection
Bruker SMART 1000 CCD diffractometer
!scans
Absorption correction: none 5566 measured re¯ections 860 independent re¯ections
803 re¯ections withI> 2(I)
Rint= 0.071
max= 30.0
h=ÿ7!7
k=ÿ10!10
l=ÿ17!17
Re®nement
Re®nement onF2
R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.041
wR(F2) = 0.109
S= 1.05 860 re¯ections 77 parameters
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained re®nement
w= 1/[2(F
o2) + (0.0857P)2
+ 0.0226P]
whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3
(/)max< 0.001
max= 0.48 e AÊÿ3
min=ÿ0.20 e AÊÿ3
Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (AÊ,).
C1ÐO1 1.224 (2) C1ÐN 1.365 (2) C1ÐC2 1.507 (2) C2ÐC3 1.539 (2)
C3ÐC4 1.502 (2) C4ÐO2 1.207 (2) C4ÐN 1.392 (2) NÐO3 1.3769 (16)
O1ÐC1ÐN 124.65 (13) O1ÐC1ÐC2 127.90 (13) NÐC1ÐC2 107.44 (12) C1ÐC2ÐC3 105.01 (13) C4ÐC3ÐC2 105.20 (12) O2ÐC4ÐN 123.54 (14)
O2ÐC4ÐC3 129.80 (14) NÐC4ÐC3 106.65 (13) C1ÐNÐO3 121.03 (12) C1ÐNÐC4 115.22 (12) O3ÐNÐC4 123.17 (12)
Table 2
Hydrogen-bonding geometry (AÊ,).
DÐH A DÐH H A D A DÐH A
O3ÐH0 O1i 0.97 (3) 1.71 (3) 2.6442 (16) 161 (3)
The hydroxy H atom was re®ned freely. Other H atoms were included using a riding model with ®xed CÐH bond lengths of 0.99 AÊ;Uiso(H) values were ®xed at 1.2 timesUeqof the parent atom.
The absolute structure could not be determined because the anom-alous scattering effects were too small, and Friedel opposite re¯ec-tions were therefore merged. The Flack (1983) parameter is meaningless in such cases. The compound is not chiral, and the concept of absolute con®guration does not apply. A rigid-body libration correction (Schomaker & Trueblood, 1968) led to the following corrected bond lengths (AÊ): C1ÐC2 1.510, C2ÐC3 1.544, C3ÐC4 1.506, C1ÐN 1.369, C4ÐN 1.395, C1ÐO1 1.227, C4ÐO2 1.210 and NÐO3 1.380.
Data collection:SMART(Bruker, 1998); cell re®nement:SAINT
(Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to re®ne structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: XP
(Siemens, 1994); software used to prepare material for publication:
SHELXL97.
The problem was suggested by Professor C. Csunderlik and Ms M. Simon, Polytechnical University of Timisoara, Romania. Financial support from the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie is gratefully acknowledged. The author thanks Mr A. Weinkauf for technical assistance.
References
Bruker (1998).SMART(Version 5.0) andSAINT(Version 4.0). Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Flack, H. D. (1983).Acta Cryst.A39, 876±881.
Miao, F.-M., Wang, J.-L. & Miao, X.-S. (1995).Acta Cryst.C51, 712±713. Reck, G. & Adam, G. (1977).Z. Chem.17, 338±339.
Schomaker, V. & Trueblood, K. N. (1968).Acta Cryst.B24, 63±76. Sheldrick, G. M. (1990).Acta Cryst.A46, 467±473.
Figure 2
supporting information
sup-1 Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, o1951–o1952
supporting information
Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, o1951–o1952 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536803025704]
N
-Hydroxysuccinimide
Peter G. Jones
(I)
Crystal data
C4H5NO3 Mr = 115.09
Orthorhombic, P212121 a = 5.4266 (8) Å
b = 7.2419 (12) Å
c = 12.445 (2) Å
V = 489.09 (13) Å3 Z = 4
F(000) = 240
Dx = 1.563 Mg m−3
Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 3627 reflections
θ = 2.8–30.5°
µ = 0.14 mm−1 T = 133 K
Irregular tablet, colourless 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.10 mm
Data collection
Bruker SMART 1000 CCD diffractometer
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator
Detector resolution: 8.192 pixels mm-1 ω scans
5566 measured reflections
860 independent reflections 803 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Rint = 0.071
θmax = 30.0°, θmin = 3.3° h = −7→7
k = −10→10
l = −17→17
Refinement
Refinement on F2
Least-squares matrix: full
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041 wR(F2) = 0.109 S = 1.05 860 reflections 77 parameters 0 restraints
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
w = 1/[σ2(F
o2) + (0.0857P)2 + 0.0226P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
Δρmax = 0.48 e Å−3
Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3
Special details
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2,
conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used
only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2
are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
The anomalous dispersion effects were not significant and Friedel opposite reflections were therefore merged. The Flack parameter is meaningless in such cases.
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)
x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.3418 (3) 0.45792 (19) 0.36706 (11) 0.0183 (3) C2 0.4766 (3) 0.5929 (2) 0.29615 (11) 0.0210 (3)
H2A 0.3675 0.6966 0.2755 0.025*
H2B 0.5367 0.5314 0.2301 0.025*
C3 0.6938 (3) 0.6623 (2) 0.36469 (12) 0.0222 (3)
H3A 0.8527 0.6213 0.3337 0.027*
H3B 0.6934 0.7988 0.3689 0.027*
C4 0.6549 (3) 0.5788 (2) 0.47386 (13) 0.0210 (3) N 0.4578 (2) 0.45687 (16) 0.46436 (10) 0.0189 (3) O1 0.1590 (2) 0.36643 (15) 0.34513 (9) 0.0232 (3) O2 0.7672 (3) 0.60296 (19) 0.55634 (10) 0.0321 (3) O3 0.3621 (2) 0.36006 (16) 0.54995 (9) 0.0237 (3)
H0 0.494 (7) 0.282 (4) 0.575 (2) 0.063 (8)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)
U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.0211 (6) 0.0130 (6) 0.0208 (6) 0.0023 (5) 0.0012 (5) −0.0006 (5) C2 0.0271 (7) 0.0155 (6) 0.0203 (6) −0.0023 (6) 0.0009 (6) 0.0007 (5) C3 0.0209 (6) 0.0181 (6) 0.0277 (7) −0.0007 (6) 0.0006 (6) 0.0036 (5) C4 0.0208 (6) 0.0147 (6) 0.0274 (7) 0.0000 (6) −0.0018 (6) 0.0018 (5) N 0.0209 (6) 0.0149 (5) 0.0208 (6) −0.0008 (5) −0.0006 (5) 0.0037 (4) O1 0.0240 (5) 0.0220 (5) 0.0236 (5) −0.0038 (5) −0.0010 (5) 0.0013 (4) O2 0.0356 (7) 0.0299 (7) 0.0307 (6) −0.0073 (5) −0.0109 (6) 0.0037 (5) O3 0.0254 (6) 0.0231 (6) 0.0227 (5) 0.0005 (5) 0.0017 (5) 0.0081 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º)
C1—O1 1.224 (2) N—O3 1.3769 (16)
C1—N 1.365 (2) C2—H2A 0.9900
C1—C2 1.507 (2) C2—H2B 0.9900
C2—C3 1.539 (2) C3—H3A 0.9900
C3—C4 1.502 (2) C3—H3B 0.9900
C4—O2 1.207 (2) O3—H0 0.97 (3)
C4—N 1.392 (2)
supporting information
sup-3 Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, o1951–o1952
C1—C2—C3 105.01 (13) C3—C2—H2B 110.7
C4—C3—C2 105.20 (12) H2A—C2—H2B 108.8
O2—C4—N 123.54 (14) C4—C3—H3A 110.7
O2—C4—C3 129.80 (14) C2—C3—H3A 110.7
N—C4—C3 106.65 (13) C4—C3—H3B 110.7
C1—N—O3 121.03 (12) C2—C3—H3B 110.7
C1—N—C4 115.22 (12) H3A—C3—H3B 108.8
O3—N—C4 123.17 (12) N—O3—H0 105.7 (18)
O1—C1—C2—C3 −178.69 (15) O1—C1—N—C4 −176.73 (14)
N—C1—C2—C3 2.65 (16) C2—C1—N—C4 1.98 (17)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −5.83 (16) O2—C4—N—C1 175.34 (16)
C2—C3—C4—O2 −174.31 (18) C3—C4—N—C1 −5.86 (17)
C2—C3—C4—N 6.99 (16) O2—C4—N—O3 4.0 (2)
O1—C1—N—O3 −5.2 (2) C3—C4—N—O3 −177.16 (12)
C2—C1—N—O3 173.48 (12)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)
D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O3—H0···O1i 0.97 (3) 1.71 (3) 2.6442 (16) 161 (3)
C3—H3A···O1ii 0.99 2.49 3.320 (2) 142
C2—H2B···O2iii 0.99 2.60 3.585 (2) 174