STUDYOF A GENERATING FUNCTION
INVOLVING GENERALISED
LAURICELLA FUNCTION
Ekta Mittal
1, Sunil Joshi
2,Rupakshi Mishra Pandey
31Department of Mathematics, The IIS University, Jaipur, Rajasthan,India 2Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Manipal University Jaipur, Rajasthan ,India
3
Department of Applied Mathematics, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida, India
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Abstract.Recently, Generating function of the extended second Appllehypergeometricfunction was introduced by S. D.Purohit, R.K.Parmar and K.S. Nishar, here in the present investigations we established some generating functions involving generalised extendedLauricellafunction
, ,
1 2,...,
; ,
1 2,...,
; ,
1 2,...,
; ;
A n n n
F a b b
b c c
c x x
x p
. Further we develop some certain interesting special casesKey words: Extended Beta function, extendedhypergeometric function, Lauricellafunction.
1. INTRODUCTION
Some extensions of the well-known special functions have been considered by several authors (See [1–6]). In 1994, Chaudhry and Zubair [1] presented the following extension of gamma function.
(1)
In 1997, Chaudhry et al.[2] presented the following extension of Euler’s Beta function.
1 1
1
0
R 0; R 0; R 0
, ;
1
xp
,
.
(1
)
y x
p x y
p
B x y p
t
t
e
dt
t
t
(2)
In 2004, Chaudhry et al. [3] used B x y p( , ; )to extend the hypergeometric functions as follows.
0
1
, ; ;
,
;
,
,
!
n
p n
n
z
F a b c z
a
B b n c b p
B b c b
n
z 1; R c R b 0; R p 0 .
(3)
In 2010, Özarslan and Özergin [7] extended the familiar Appellhypergeometric function using
B x y p
( , ; )
as given below.
2
, 0
,
;
'
, '
';
, , '; , '; , ;
,
,
', '
'
! !
m n m n
m n
B b m c b p B b
n c
b p x y
F a b b c c x y p
a
B b c b B b c
b
m n
1
1
0
;
xexp
,
,
(Re
> 0, Re
> 0) .
x p
t
t
t
pt
dt
x
p
In 2011, Lee et al.[9], presented the generalisation of extended beta function (2) and hypergeometric function
(3) as follows: 1
1 1
0
( , ; ; )
(1
)
exp
,
(1
)
x y
p
B x y p
t
t
dt
t
t
R x ,R y 0,R p 0,R 0 .
(5)and
;
0
1
, ; ;
,
; ;
,
,
!
n n
p
n
z
F
a b c z
a
B b n c b p
B b c b
n
z 1,R c R b 0,R p 0,R 0 .
(6)
Recently R. K. Parmar (2014) generalised the extended Appellhypergeometric function by usingB x y p
, , ;
,
2
, 0
,
; ;
'
, '
'; ;
, , '; , '; , ; ;
,
,
', '
'
! !
m n m n
m n
B b m c b p
B b
n c
b p
x
y
F a b b c c x y p
a
B b c b B b c
b
m n
x y 1;R p 0,R 0 .
(7)
Here we also use
B x y p
, , ;
in the firstLauricella function such as
1 1 1
( )
, ,.... ; ,... ; ,...,
n n n; ;
n A
F
a b
b c
c x
x p
1
1
1
1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
...
,..., 0 1 1 1 2 2 2
1 1
;
; ;
;
; ;
...
;
; ;
;
;
...
;
...
,
!
!
n
n
n
n n n n m m
m m n n n
m m n
n
a
B b
m c
b p
B b
m c
b p
B b
m c
b p
B b c
b B b c
b
B b c
b
x
x
m
m
where
x1 ... xn 1 .
(8)When
1,
equations (5), (6),(7) yields extended Beta function,Gauss’shypergeometricandAppellhypergeometric functions [5,8] respectively.If we put
1,
p
0,
in equation (9), we get the Lauricella function.2. MAIN RESULT
Here we obtain some generating function for the generalised extendedLauricella function
( )
1 1 1
, ,.... ; ,... ; ,... ; ;
n
A n n n
Theorem-1: The following function hold true
1 1 1
0
1 2
1 1
, ,.... ; ,... ; ,... ; ;
!
1
, ,.... ; ,... ;
,
...,
; ;
,
1
1
1
k n
A n n n
k k
n n
A n n
t
F
k b
b c
c x
x p
k
x
x
x
t
F
b
b c
c
p
t
t
t
where{R p
0,R
0,C and t 1}.
Proof:Using definition (8) in the left hand side,we have
1 1 1
0
, ,.... ; ,... ; ,... ; ;
!
k nA n n n
k k
t
F
k b
b c
c x
x p
k
0!
k k kt
k
1 1 11 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
... 1
1 1 1 2 2 2 1
,..., 0 ; ; ; ; ; ; ... ; ; ; .. , , ... , ! ! n n n m m
n n n n
m m n
n n n n
m m
k B b m c b p B b m c b p B b m c b p x x
B b c b B b c b B b c b m m
Changing order of summation
1
1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
,..., 0 1 1 1 2 2 2
;
; ;
;
; ;
...
;
; ;
,
,
...
,
n
n n n n
m m n n n
B b
m c
b p
B b
m c
b p
B b
m c
b p
B b c
b B b c
b
B b c
b
11 1 ... 0 1
.
...
!
!
!
n nm m k
n
k m m
k n
x
x
t
k
m
m
k
Using the identity
1 2 ... 1 2 ... 1 2
...
n n n
k k m m m m m m m m m k
in above equation, we have
1 2 1
1
1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 ...
,..., 0 1 1 1 2 2 2
1 1 2 0 1 ; ; ; ; ; ; ... ; ; ; , , ... , . .. . ... ! ! !
n n nn n n n
m m m
m m n n n
m m k
n
n k k
n
B b m c b p B b m c b p B b m c b p
B b c b B b c b B b c b
x x t
m m m
m m k
1 2 1 1 1 21 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
...
,..., 0 1 1 1 2 2 2
... 1 1 ; ; ; ; ; ; ... ; ; ; , , ... , ( ) ( )
. ... 1
! !
n n n nn n n n m m m
m m n n n
m m
m m m n
n
B b m c b p B b m c b p B b m c b p
B b c b B b c b B b c b
x x t m m
1
,
1,
2,...,
;
1,
2,...,
;
1,
2,...,
; ;
nA n n n
t
F
b b
b c c
c x x
x
p
Theorem-2:For
R p
0,R
0,C&t 1
1 2 1 2 1 2
0
, , ,..., ; , ,..., ; , ,..., ; ; n
A n n n
k k
F k b b b c c c x x x p
1
2
1 2 1 2
1
, ,
,...,
; ,
,...,
;
,
,...,
; ;
1
1
1
n n
A n n
x t
x t
x t
t
F
b b
b c c
c
p
t
t
t
Proof: using above definition of Lauricella function (8) and changing order of summation, we get
1
1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
,..., 0 1 1 1 2 2 2
;
; ;
;
; ;
...
;
; ;
.
,
,
....
,
n
n n n n
m m n n n
B b
m c
b p
B b
m c
b p
B b
m c
b
p
B b c
b B b c
b
B b c
b
1
1 1 ... 0 1 . ... ! ! ! n n
m m k
n
k m m
k n
x x t
k
m m k
Using following factorial function property in above theorem
1 2 1 2 ... ... 1 2 1 ! [ ... ]! n nm m m
m m m
n k
k k m m m
, we get
1 1 1 21 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
,..., 0 1 1 1 2 2 2
... 1
0 1 1 2
; ; ; ; ; ; ... ; ; ; , , ... , 1 ... ! ! [ ... ]! n n n
n n n n
m m n n n
m m k
m m m n
k
k n n
B b m c b p B b m c b p B b m c b p
B b c b B b c b B b c b
x x t
m m k m m m
If we put, k k m1m2....mn,we get the required result.
Corollary:
1 2 1 2 1 2
0
1 1 1 2 2 2
0, 0, & 1
,
, ,
,...,
; ,
,...,
; ,
,...,
; ;
; ;
,
;
;
,
...
;
;
,
n k
A n n n
k
t
p p p n n n
R p R C t
for
F
k b b
b c c
c x x
x p
t
e
b c
x t
b c
x t
b c
x t
Proof: By replacing k
in the theorem (2), then we have
1 2 1
1 2
1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
...
,..., 0 1 1 1 2 2 2
1 2 1 2 ; ; ; ; ; ; ... ; ; ; 1 , , ... , /
/ 1 / 1 1
....
(1 / ) ! (1 / ) ! (1 / )
n n
n
n n n n m m m
m m n n n
m m m
n
n
B b m c b p B b m c b p B b m c b p
t
B b c b B b c b B b c b
x t
x t x t
t m t m t m
!
1 1 2
1 2 1 1 2 ... ... ... ,..., 0
1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
1 1 1 2 2 2
1 2
1
1
;
; ;
;
; ;
...
;
; ;
.
,
,
...
,
.
...
,
n n n n nm m m m m
m m m m m
n n n n n n n
m m m
n
t
B b
m c
b p
B b
m c
b p
B b
m c
b p
B b c
b B b c
b
B b c
b
x t
x t
x t
usingbinomial theorem,taking limit , and using the property
1 2 ... 1 2 1 2 ...
( )
(
...
)
(
)
( )
n n
m m m
m
m
m
n kk
m m m k
and
/
,
0
Lim x n xn n N
n
, we get desired result.
3. SPECIAL CASES
Case-I: if we put
1 in theorem 1 and theorem 2 above results are reduced to the extended Lauricella function.
( )
1 1 1
0
1 2
1 1
{ 0, 1}
, ,.... ; ,... ; ,... ;
!
1
, ,.... ; ,... ;
,
...,
;
,
1
1
1
.
k n
A n n n
k k
n n
A n n
R p C and t
t
F
k b
b c
c x
x p
k
x
x
x
t
F
b
b c
c
p
t
t
t
where
and
1 2 1 2 1 2
0
1 2
1 2 1 2
0,
&
1 ,
, ,
,...,
; ,
,...,
; ,
,...,
;
!
1
, ,
,...,
; ,
,...,
;
,
,...,
;
.
1
1
1
k n
A n n n
k k
n n
A n n
for R p
C
t
t
F
k b b
b c c
c x x
x
p
k
x t
x t
x t
t
F
b b
b c c
c
p
t
t
t
Case-2: If we put1,p0, in theorem 1 and 2, the above results arereducedtotheLauricella function.
Case-3: If we put
x
3
x
4
...
x
n
0
,then results are converted into generalised extended second Appell function.Case-4: If we put
x
2
x
3x
4
...
x
n
0
then results are true for generalised extended Gauss hypergeometric function.4.CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
[1]M. A. Chaudhry, S. M. Zubair, Generalized incomplete gamma functions withapplications,J. Comput. Appl. Math. 55 (1994), 99–124. [2] M. A. Chaudhry, A. Qadir, M. Rafique, S. M. Zubair, Extension of Euler’s betafunction, J. Compt. Appl. Math. 78 (1997), 19–32. [3] M. A. Chaudhry, A. Qadir, H. M. Srivastava, R. B. Paris, Extended hypergeometricand confluent hypergeometric function, Appl. Math.Comput. 159 (2004),589–602.
[4] M.A. Chaudhry, S.M. Zubair, On a Class of Incomplete Gamma Functions withApplications, CRC Press (Chapman and Hall), Boca Raton, FL, 2002.
[5]M. A. Chaudhry, S. M. Zubair, Extended incomplete gamma functions with applications,J. Math. Anal. Appl. 274 (2002), 725–745. [6] E. Ӧzergin, M.A. Ӧzarslan , A. Altin, Extension of gamma, beta and hypergeometricfunction, J. Comp. and Appl. Math, 235(16)(2011), 4601–4610.
[7] M.A. Ӧzarslan, E. Ӧzergin, Some generating relations for extended hypergeometricfunction via generalized fractional derivative operator. Math.Comput.Model.52(2010), 1825–1833.
[8]E.D. Rainville, Special Functions, Macmillan Company, New York, 1960; Reprinted ByChelsea Publishing Company, Bronx, New York, 1971.
[9]D. M. Lee , A. K. Rathie, R. K. Parmar, Y. S. Kim, Generalization of ExtendedBeta Function, Hypergeometric and Confluent Hypergeometric Functions, HonamMath. Journal 33 (2) (2011), 187–206.