• No results found

Deriving Shape Functions for 2,3,4,5 Noded Line Element by Lagrange Functions and Verified

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Deriving Shape Functions for 2,3,4,5 Noded Line Element by Lagrange Functions and Verified"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Deriving Shape Functions for 2,3,4,5 Noded

Line Element by Lagrange Functions and

Verified

P. Reddaiah#1

# Professor of Mathematics, Global College of Engineering and Technology, kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Abstract In this paper, I derived shape functions for 2,3,4,5 noded line element by lagrange functions and also I verified two verification conditions for shape functions. First verification condition is sum of all the shape functions is equal to one and second verification condition is each shape function has a value of one at its own node and zero at the other nodes. For computational purpose I used Mathematica 9 Software [2].

Keywords Line element, Lagrange functions, Shape functions.

I. INTRODUCTION

Lagrange polynomials can be straight way used as shape functions for one dimensional problems. Line element with 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 nodes is shown in figures.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. In finite element method, the complex domain like a complicated structure is discretized into many number of finite elements and the solution like nodal displacements, element stresses are evaluated in the various locations of the structure. For achieving the nodal displacements in all parts of the element, we have to depend on mathematical relation namely shape functions.

II.GEOMETRICALDESCREPTION

Line element with 2,3,4,5 nodes is shown in figures.1,2,3,4.

Figure.1: 2 noded line element

Figure.2: 3 noded line element

Figure.3: 4 noded line element

Figure.4: 5 noded line element

III. DERIVING SHAPE FUNCTIONS FOR 2,3,4,5 NODED LINE ELEMENT

(i) The typical 2 noded element is shown in Figure.1.

1 2

Shape function for node 1 is N and for node 2 is N

1 2

: 1

: 1

x

x

  

function for node 1&2

Lagrange

2

1

1 2

: x x

N

x x

 

1

2

2 1

: x x

N

x x

 

1 2 N

(2)

1 2 1

2

Output

x

x

1 2

2 noded element shape functions are

1 1

N and N

2 2

For

x x

 

 

Condition : Sum of all the shape functions is equal to one

st

Verification

I

1

2

1 2

1 N :

2 1 N :

2

[N N ]

1

x

x

FullSimplifly

Output

 

 

Condition: Each shape function has a value of one at its own node and zero at the other nodes.

nd II

1 2

Node 1 x = -1 then we get

N 1, N 0

At

 

1 2

Node 2 x = 1 then we get

N 0, N 1

At

 

(ii) The typical 3 noded element is shown in Figure.2.

1 2

3

Shape function for node 1 is N , for node 2 is N and for

node 3 is N 1

2 3

: 1

: 0 : 1

x

x

x

   

function for node 1,2&3

Lagrange



2



3

1

1 2 1 3

: x x x x

N

x x x x

 

 



1



3

2

2 1 2 3

: x x x x

N

x x x x

 

 



1



2

3

3 1 3 2

: x x x x

N

x x x x

 

 

1 2 3

N

N

N

1

( 1 )

2

( 1 )(1 )

1

(1 )

2

Output

x x

x x

x x

 

   

1 2

3

3 noded element shape functions are 1

N ( 1 ) , N ( 1 )(1 )

2 1

and N (1 )

2

For

x x x x

x x

       

 

Condition : Sum of all the shape functions is equal to one

st

Verification

I

1 2

3

1 2 3

1

N : ( 1 ) N : ( 1 )(1 )

2 1

N : (1 )

2

FullSimplify[N + N +N ]

1

x x x x

x x

Output

       

 

Condition: Each shape function has a value of one at its own node and zero at the other nodes.

nd II

1

2 3

Node 1 x = -1 then we get N 1,

N 0, N 0

At

 

1

2 3

Node 2 x = 0 then we get N 0,

N 1, N 0

At

 

1 2 3

Node 3 x = 1 then we get

N 0, N 0, N 1

At

  

(iii) The typical 4 noded element is shown in Figure.3.

1 2

(3)

1 2 3 4 : 1 1 : 3 1 : 3 : 1 x x x x      

function for node 1,2,3&4

Lagrange





2



3



4

1

1 2 1 3 1 4

: x x x x x x

N

x x x x x x

  

  





1



3



4

2

2 1 2 3 2 4

: x x x x x x

N

x x x x x x

  

  





1



2



4

3

3 1 3 2 3 4

: x x x x x x

N

x x x x x x

  

  





1



2



3

4

4 1 4 2 4 3

: x x x x x x

N

x x x x x x

       1 2 3 4 N N N N

9 1 1

( 1 )

16 3 3

27 1 1 1 16 3 27 1 1 1 16 3

9 1 1

1

16 3 3

Output

x x x

x x x

x x x

x x x

                                     

1 2 3 4

4 noded element shape functions are

9 1 1

N ( 1 ) ,

16 3 3

27 1

N 1 1 ,

16 3

27 1

N 1 1 and

16 3

9 1 1

N 1

16 3 3

For

x x x

x x x

x x x

x x x

                                            

Condition : Sum of all the shape functions is equal to one

st Verification I

1 2 3 4

9 1 1

N : ( 1 )

16 3 3

27 1

N : 1 1

16 3

27 1

N : 1 1 and

16 3

9 1 1

N : 1

16 3 3

x x x

x x x

x x x

x x x

                                           

1 2 3 4

FullSimplify[N + N +N N ]

1

Output

Condition: Each shape function has a value of one at its own node and zero at the other nodes.

nd II

1 2 3 4

Node 1 x = -1 then we get

N 1, N 0, N 0, 0

At

N

   

1 2 3 4

1

Node 2 x = - then we get 3

N 0, N 1, N 0, N 0

At

   

1 2 3 4

1

Node 3, x = then we get 3

N 0, N 0, N 1, N 0

At

   

1 2 3 4

Node 4, x = 1 then we get

N 0, N 0, N 0, N 1

At

   

(iv) The typical 5 noded element is shown in Figure.4.

1

2 3

4 5

Shape function for node 1 is N , for node 2 is N , for node 3 is N , for node 4 is N and for node 5 is N .

(4)

function for node 1,2,3,4&5.

Lagrange







2



3



4



5

1

1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5

: x x x x x x x x

N

x x x x x x x x

   

   









1 3



4



5

2

2 1 2 3 2 4 2 5

: x x x x x x x x

N

x x x x x x x x

   

   







1



2



4



5

3

3 1 3 2 3 4 3 5

: x x x x x x x x

N

x x x x x x x x

   

   









1 2



3



5

4

4 1 4 2 4 3 4 5

: x x x x x x x x

N

x x x x x x x x

   

   







1



2



3



4

5

5 1 5 2 5 3 5 4

: x x x x x x x x

N

x x x x x x x x

         1 2 3 4 5 N N N N N

8 1 1

( 1 )

15 4 4

Output

xx x  x

     

   

128 1

( 1 ) 1

15 x 4 x x x

 

    

 

1 1

16( 1 ) 1

4 4

xx xx

    

  

128 1

( 1 ) 1

15 x x 4 x x

 

  

 

8 1 1

(1 )

15 4 x x 4 x x

           

1 2 3 4 5

5 noded element shape functions are

8 1 1

N ( 1 ) ,

15 4 4

128 1

N ( 1 ) 1 ,

15 4

1 1

N 16( 1 ) 1 ,

4 4

128 1

N ( 1 ) 1

15 4

8 1

and N

15 4

For

x x x x

x x x x

x x x x

x x x x

x                                                         1 (1 ) 4

xxx

 

Condition : Sum of all the shape functions is equal to one

st Verification I

1 2 3 4 5 1

8 1 1

N : ( 1 ) ,

15 4 4

128 1

N : ( 1 ) 1 ,

15 4

1 1

N : 16( 1 ) 1 ,

4 4

128 1

N : ( 1 ) 1

15 4

8 1 1

and N : (1 )

15 4 4

FullSimplify[N

x x x x

x x x x

x x x x

x x x x

x x x x

                                                             

2 3 4 5

+ N +N N N ]

1

Output

 

Condition: Each shape function has a value of one at its own node and zero at the other nodes.

nd II

1 2 3 4

5

Node 1 x = -1 then we get

N 1, N 0, N 0, 0,

0 At N N     

1 2 3 4

5

1

Node 2 x = - then we get 4

N 0, N 1, N 0, N 0,

N 0

At

   

1 2 3 4

5

Node 3, x = 0 then we get

N 0, N 0, N 1, N 0,

N 0

At

   

1 2 3 4

5

1

Node 4, x = then we get 4

N 0, N 0, N 0, N 1,

N 0

At

   

1 2 3 4

5

Node 5, x = 1 then we get

N 0, N 0, N 0, N 0,

N 1

At

   

IV. CONCLUSIONS

(5)

2. Verified sum of all the shape functions is equal to one

3. Verified each shape function has a value of one at its own node and zero at the other nodes.

REFERENCES

[1] S.S. Bhavikatti, Finite Element Analysis, New Age International (P) Limited, Publishers, 2

nd

Edition, 2010. [2] Mathematica 9 Software, Wolfram Research, Version

number 9.0.0.0, 1988-2012.

[3] J.N. Reddy, An introduction to Finite Element Method, 2nd

References

Related documents

Among the methods for estimation of the complete model, both the sub- models are estimated simultaneously, either using covariance structure analysis, usually termed LISREL

Since tremor frequencies of PD and ET can overlap with range from 4 to 8 Hz [ 7 ], and to exclude low frequency high amplitude signal caused by movements while performing

The beauty I saw was not just something to be made, “but indeed facility to believe, impatience to doubt, temerity to answer, glory to know, doubt to contradict, end to gain, sloth

The present study was conducted to study the ameliorating effect of Nigella sativa seed oil (5ml/ kg body weight, 10 ml/kg body weight) on the liver damage caused by

Besides the fundamental word embedding based CNN model, following four features/strategies are adopted in our method to boost our final performance. 1) Character- level:

The methylation profile of 25 PeCa, 10 surrounding non-malignant tissues (SNT), and 4 normal glans (NG) samples was evaluated using methyl-CpG immunopre- cipitation