• No results found

Units 3 and 4 Software development. Implementation program April to May 2015 VCAA and Digital Learning and Teaching Victoria (DLTV)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Units 3 and 4 Software development. Implementation program April to May 2015 VCAA and Digital Learning and Teaching Victoria (DLTV)"

Copied!
58
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Units 3 and 4

Software development

Implementation program

April to May 2015

VCAA and Digital Learning and Teaching Victoria (DLTV)

(2)

q Software Development has experienced a 9% increase in numbers since last year

q IT Applications has experienced a 9.5% increase in numbers since last year

(3)

Agenda

q Important information

q Changes for 2016

q Structure of Software Development

q School-based assessment

q School Assessed Coursework

q School Assessed Task

q Delivering a course

q Units 3 & 4 Outcomes

(4)
(5)
(6)

q Accreditation period (Study Design)

•  1st January 2016 – 31st December 2019 q SAT training day in February 2016

q Visit the VCAA webpage regularly

q Subscribe to and read the VCAA Bulletin

q Advice for Teachers (coming out in Term 4)

•  Assessment Criteria

(7)
(8)

Why change?

q More coding

•  Students want more

q Options for new languages and flexibility

•  Possibility for students in one class to be using different languages

q Future proofing

q Decent sized software solutions

•  Apps/games/robotics etc

(9)

Key changes

q No approved programming languages list

q U4O2 – change of focus (report – no longer a test)

q School-assessed Task (project over two outcomes)

q Introduction of types of thinking

(10)
(11)

Structure of Software

Development

(12)

Sof Dev focus – software solutions and systems Programming practice Analysis and design Software solutions Interactions and impact

(13)

U3 AoS 1 Programming practice U3 AoS 2 Analysis and design U4 AoS 1 Software solutions U4 AoS 2 Interactions and impact SAC Set of code modules SAC written report or visual report U3 O1 U3 O2 U4 O1 U4 O2 SAT

Solution analysis Software

Folio of design solution

ideas written report or

Project plan visual plan

Software for -­‐ Programming language Software to -­‐ Prepare project plans Software for -­‐ Programming language -­‐ Document project progress Exam

Source: Chris Bucknell Software Development Structure

(14)
(15)

School-based assessment

U3O1(SAC)

10% study

score

U3O2 (SAT)

15% of study

score

U4O1 (SAT)

15% of Study

score

U4O2 (SAC)

10% study

score

GA1 (SACs) 20% GA2 (SAT) 30% GA3 (Exam) 50%

(16)

School Assessed

Coursework

(17)
(18)
(19)

Assessing SACs

q There will be Advice for Teachers

q Rubrics have been written by the VCAA

q Teacher still has control of SACs

q Similar to Performance Descriptors in current

Assessment Handbook, but as a rubric

q Descriptors will be read from left to right against

the Outcome statement (similar to the SAT) q More on the next slide

(20)

Assessing SACs

q Just to give you some idea of the descriptors:

•  They will be a five point system from:

– Very Low, Low, Medium, High, Very High

•  Include:

– Software designs

– Appropriately selected data types and data structures

– Use of appropriate processing features

– Appropriate range of test data

– Tests successfully applied

– Complete internal documentation

(21)
(22)
(23)

School-assessed Tasks

Extended project – over two outcomes

Mandated assessment criteria

Scores for each outcome are reported separately (see informatics)

Ongoing teaching/learning/assessing process

Individual projects for authentication (e.g. app;

planning project; web service, SML stream, games

(24)

SAT components

SAT U4 O1 U3 O2 Analyse and document a need or opportunity; generate alternative design ideas; preferred solution design Create a solution that fulfils requirements.

Formulate project plan

Evaluate project plan

project plan U3O2 -  Analysis (SRS) -  Folio of design ideas -  Detailed design U4O1 -  Software solution -  Annotated project plan

(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)

SAT documentation

http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/vce/ algorithmics/SBA_algorithmics.pdf

(31)
(32)
(33)

q VCAA Workshop 2016

q Study Design

•  Glossary

•  Problem-solving methodology

•  Units 3 & 4 O1 & O2s Key Knowledge and Key Skills

q Advice for Teachers

•  Sample activities

q Assessment Criteria

(34)

q Look at each semester in the school calendar

q Give around:

•  40% to U3 O1 60% to U3 O2

•  60% to U4 O1 40% to U4 O2

q Work out how many Key Knowledge points you

can deliver each week

•  Mix practical and theory

q Assign time for a Practice SAC (S/N)

q Assign time for the SAC/SAT

q Put into a course timeline/outline

(35)

q Create a table and focus on:

•  Week no

•  Dates for each week

•  Interruptions for each week (school)

•  Key Knowledge to be delivered each week

•  Practical work to be delivered each week

•  Timing of the Practice task

•  Timing of the SAC/SAT

(36)
(37)
(38)

Unit 3 Outcome 1

New terminology:

q XML file formats

•  Structured data file format

•  Office documents and web services q Linear searching

•  Searching for an element in an array element-by-element

q Trace tables

(39)
(40)
(41)

Unit 3 Outcome 2

New terminology:

q Techniques for idea generation

q Interoperability and marketability

q User experience

q Project management concepts and processes

q Application architecture

q Legal requirements re: ownership and privacy of data

(42)

Questions

(43)
(44)
(45)

Unit 4 Outcome 1

New terminology:

q Associative arrays

•  Arrays with named keys that are associated with a known value

q Usability testing

(46)

http://www.slideshare.net/esnowdon/prototyping-and-usability-testing-your-designs

What is usability? – U4O1

(47)

Usability techniques

recording

listening

observing

http://www.shutterstock.com/

(48)

Based on: http://www.slideshare.net/esnowdon/prototyping-and-usability-testing-your-designs Planning Test environment Recruiting Test materials Test conduct

& debriefing Analyse results presentation Report &

Usability test process

U4O1: techniques for testing the useability of solutions and forms of documenting test results

(49)
(50)
(51)

Unit 4 Outcome 2

New terminology:

q Types of interactions (inputs and outputs)

q Characteristics of data integrity

•  Accuracy •  Timeliness

•  Reasonableness •  Authenticity

(52)

Analyse and explain the dependencies between two information systems that share data, and discuss the extent to which one information system relies on

(53)

Questions

(54)
(55)
(56)

Examination

q Process for writing sample questions for the 2016

Examination is about to begin

(57)

Questions

(58)

Copyright

© Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (2015).

Third parties may own copyright in some content included in this presentation, as indicated.

The term VCE and associated logos are registered trademarks of the VCAA.

VCAA content may be used in accordance with the VCAA’s Intellectual Property and Copyright Policy

http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Pages/aboutus/policies/ policy-copyright.aspx

References

Related documents

The sperm parameters evaluation revealed that the mean sperm count of the control group is lower than those of the other groups while the level of sperm count and sperm

The Institution of Honorary Supervisors in the System of Public Education of the Russian Empire in the First Half of the 19th Century (The Case of the Kharkov Educational

The influence of the native Kalmyk language level in high school students on the development of creative musical abilities was studied based on the

We have identified the dependence of the level of development of methodological reflection on the level of development of skills to solve the TLI at the end of

This indicates that high school students are more sensitive (5.5 times) to the positive impact of family education strategies in the development of self-regulation

No significant difference was found in terms of gender for those styles except avoidant decion making styles and visual learning modalitiy both for parametric and

graduation rates and on college enrollment after on-time graduation (Table 1), the study found that, of the students who graduated from high school on time, 68.4 percent of

Since software metrics mitigate risk and increase control of the software development process, IS auditors should ensure that development teams use software metrics