Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Td Today s faculty features:

(1)

Presenting a live 90‐minute webinar with interactive Q&A

Structured Settlements and

Deferred Attorney Fees

Leveraging Structured Arrangements to Protect the Client, Facilitate Case Resolution, and Provide Tax‐Deferred Benefits for Counsel T d ’ f l f

1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific

TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 2011

Today’s faculty features: Brian Michaels, General Counsel, Brook Hollow Financial, Chicago Christopher J. Princis, Senior Vice President, Brook Hollow Financial, Chicago Robert W. Wood, Partner, Wood & Porter, San Francisco

The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you

(2)

Conference Materials

If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps:

• Click on the + sign next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the

left-hand column on your screen hand column on your screen.

• Click on the tab labeled “Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a

PDF of the slides for today's program.

• Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. • Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.

(3)

Continuing Education Credits

FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY

For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps:

• Close the notification box

• In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of

attendees at your location

(4)

Tips for Optimal Quality

S d Q lit Sound Quality

If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet

connection.

If the sound quality is not satisfactory and you are listening via your computer speakers, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-873-1442 and enter your PIN when prompted Otherwise please send us a chat or e mail

when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail

[email protected] immediately so we can address the problem.

If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.

Viewing Quality

To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again

(5)

After Settlement Success

What You Need to Know

Brian S. Michaels, Esq. General Counsel, Brook Hollow Financial

Christopher J. Princis Senior Vice President, Brook Hollow Financial Robert W. Wood Partner Wood & Porter Partner, Wood & Porter

(6)

Agenda

1. Settlement Funds/468B/QSF

2. Deferred Attorney Fees

3. Structured Settlements

4. Wrap-up

(7)

Challenges With Multi Party Settlements

Challenges With Multi-Party Settlements

• Multiple Defendants

Multiple Defendants

–

Varying settlement timeframes

• Multiple Plaintiffs/Claimants

–

Varying settlement timeframes

Liens

• Multiple Law Firms

• Liens

• Attorney Fee Opportunities

• Structured Settlement Issues

Structured Settlement Issues

(8)

S l ti

Solution:

• Qualified Settlement Fund

–

IRC Section 468B

(9)

Qualified Settlement Funds (1 of 2)

• Qualified Settlement Funds (“QSFs”) were

(

)

established by Congress.

• Fund is established and defendant pays

i t th f

d

t

l

f li bilit

into the fund, gets a release of liability

and tax deduction.

• Allows plaintiff(s) to settle case and

Allows plaintiff(s) to settle case and

receive payment from defendant without

triggering constructive receipt of the

funds.

• Routinely used in class actions and

mass tort cases of all sizes and

comple it

complexity.

(10)

Qualified Settlement Funds (2 of 2)

• 3 Requirements to be treated as a QSF

O d

d b

j i di ti

- Order approved by any jurisdiction.

- Established to resolve 1 or more claims.

- Fund is a trust under state law and

(11)

(12)

Cases Where QSFs Have Been Used

• 100’s of mass tort and class action cases

• Cook County Building

50 l i tiff

–

50+ plaintiffs

–

Multitude of unresolved issues

• John Hancock Scaffolding

John Hancock Scaffolding

–

$78 million

–

18 plaintiffs

20 d f

d

t

• 20+ defendants,

(13)

Opportunities For Using QSF

pp

g

• QSF by Case/Firm

L

Fi

t bli h

QSF

• Law Firm establishes own QSF

–

“similarly situated” cases

• QSF by Case/Multiple Firms

–

Each firm establishes own

sub-QSF (Avandia)

• Other

• Why?

–

Liens, administration, deferred

f

Other

attorney fees, structured settlements,

SNTs, etc.

–

Away from eyes/influence of defense

–

Makes everything easier

(14)

Deferred Attorney

F

(15)

Let’s Clarify

• ANY contingent fee can be

deferred (not just personal injury)

• Attorney can defer their contingent

fee REGARDLESS if client chooses

a structured settlement.

• Create custom portfolio with

(16)

Deferred fees continued

• Authorized by Childs v. Commissioner

(2103 T.C. 634, 94 TNT 223-15

(1994), and affirmed by the 11

th

_Circuit

U.S. Federal Appeals Court in Childs

v. Commissioner, (aff’d without

opinion) 89 F.3d 856, Doc 96-19540,

p

)

96 TNT 133-7 (11th Cir. 1996)).

• Payable Directly to the Law Firm

Payable Directly to the Law Firm

or Attorney

• Can structure all or a portion

(17)

Why Structure Attorney Fees?

• Income Tax Deferral. This is an excellent tool

to smooth out income from year to year and

minimize problems such as the Alternative

Minimum Tax and phase-outs with the very real

possibility of lowering taxes actually paid.

p

y

g

y p

• Retirement Planning. 100% of income can be

structured. Unlike other retirement plans there is no

income limit on participation rules and no annual

income limit, on participation rules and no annual

administrative costs. It has been described as an

uncapped 401(K) plan.

• Overhead Expenses. Law firms have used

structured attorney fees to provide for future

law firm overhead expenses. By structuring a

portion of current fees (or a portion of big blips

in income) firms have lowered reliance on

(18)

Taxable Equivalent Analysis:

What you have to earn to match the power of deferral

(19)

(20)

(21)

Structuring Contingent Attorney Fee:

Procedural Steps

1. Client and Attorney Fee Agreement

2. Plaintiff and Defendant Agree on Settlement

3. Parties Meet With Settlement Specialist to

Determine Amount and Timing of Payments

4 Plaintiff Executes Settlement Agreement and

4. Plaintiff Executes Settlement Agreement and

Release, with Attorney Fee payable in

Exchange for…

5 D f

d

t P

i

t M k F t

5. Defendants Promises to Make Future

Periodic Payments to Attorney for fee

6. Defendant Assigns Obligation to Make

g

(22)

St

t i

C

ti

t Att

F

Structuring Contingent Attorney Fee:

Procedural Steps

7. Defendant Transfers Cash to Assignment Company

8. Assignment Company Uses Cash to Purchase

g

p

y

Investments to Fund Future Payments

9. Assignment Company (or their Custodian) Makes

Future Periodic Payments to Plaintiff Attorney

10. Guarantee of the Performance of the Qualified

Assignee is Issued

g

11. Attorney can structure their fee regardless

of what client does with their settlement

(23)

Deferred Attorney Fees

Client

Attorney

Legal Representation

y

Pay Fee in Cash +/or Promise of

Future Periodic Payments

Key Point: Legal fee agreement between

Client and Attorney should provide for

y

p

payment of contingent fee in form of lump

sum and/or future periodic payments.

(24)

Deferred Attorney Fees cont

Deferred Attorney Fees cont…

Cash + Promise of

Future Periodic Payments

Attorney

Defendant

Settlement Agreement Future Periodic Payments

Settlement Agreement and Release Cash Liability to make Future Periodic Payments Future Periodic P t

Assignment

Investment

Investment(s) Payments

Assignment

Company

Investment

Provider

Cash

(25)

Legal and Tax History

• Pre-Childs

– TAMs 9134004, 9134005, 9134006

– IRS said FMV of payment rights includible in

attorney’s current year tax

attorney s current year tax

• Childs v. Commissioner

– The seminal structured attorney fee case

The seminal structured attorney fee case

– 103 T.C. 634, 94 TNT 223-15 (1994), aff’d

without opinion 89 F.3d 856, (11th Cir. 1996).

• IRS has not formally acquiesced, Tax Court

y

q

,

bound by Childs in 11

th

_{Circuit, even so, Tax}

Court usually follows published guidance

from another Circuit where no other

published guidance exists

published guidance exists…

(26)

Legal History cont

Legal History cont.

Post-Childs

No cases or rulings to our

knowledge since Childs

IRS has cited Childs favorably

Rev. Rul. 2003-115, 2003-46 IRB 1052,

Doc 2003-23359, 2003 TNT 209-15 - No

constructive receipt where irrevocable election

and substantial limitations or restrictions

FSA 200151003 - Cites Childs, attorney has no

constructive receipt where settlement is entered

into before attorney has unconditional right to

receive fee PLR 200836019 - No constructive

receipt…employment settlement

(27)

Childs v. Commissioner

• Facts

– Flows from a case where a house blew up b/c of propane gas with one person seriously injured and one death

– Plaintiff Lawyers agree to periodic payments for portion of legal feesPlaintiff Lawyers agree to periodic payments for portion of legal fees – Provided for in settlement agreement with assignment of liability to 3rd

party assignee

– Assignment company purchased annuity to fund future payments – Lawyer(s) named annuitants of the annuities and estates named

beneficiaries

– Annuity subject to rights of general creditor, however insurance company guaranteed performance of the assignment company

– Lawyers had no right to accelerate payments and no rights greater than a general creditor

a general creditor

• Issue(s)

– When are the attorney fees includible by the attorney

i hi t bl i ?

in his taxable income?

• Holding

– The Tax Court (affirmed by the 11th Circuit) held that( y ) the attorneys did not constructively receive the fees

(28)

Childs v. Commissioner

• Tax Court Holding(s):

1. HELD: The fair market values of Ps' rights to receive payments under the settlement agreements were not includable in

income under sec. 83, I.R.C. in the year in which the

settlement agreements were effected, since the promises to pay under the structured settlements were neither funded nor secured and thus did not meet the definition of property for purposes of sec.83.

2. HELD, FURTHER, the doctrine of constructive receipt is inapplicable, since Ps had no right to receive the attorney's fees prior to the time the agreement fixing a structured settlement was entered into fixing a structured settlement was entered into.

• 11th Circuit Holding:

Affi d th T C t i d i i

(29)

Technical Requirements of

q

Deferred Attorney Fee

• FORM is important with tax – do it

right on the front end!

• No constructive receipt

• No IRC Section 409A

No economic benefit

• No economic benefit

• Work with a highly

g y

qualified advisor

(30)

Tax Issues and/or Consequences

to Attorney’s Client and Defendant

to Attorney s Client and Defendant

• Client/Claimant/Plaintiff – IRC §104 case

• no taxation issues/consequences as proceeds are tax freeno taxation issues/consequences as proceeds are tax free – Non IRC §104 case

• Settlement proceeds taxable

– Structure can lower overall tax paid significantly • Attorney fees included in income of client, see

Commissioner v. Banks and Commissioner v. Banaitis, 175 S.Ct. 826; 2005 U.S. Lexis 1370 (2005)

• American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 P L 108-357American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, P.L. 108 357 – Certain cases get above the line deduction, which

effectively nets out the attorney fees

» False Claims Act and Section 1862(b)(3)(A) of S i l S it A t d

Social Security Act, and

– Certain other cases do not get above the line » A long list of laws that provide for

employment claims

– Certain other cases do not get above the line

deduction, but get itemized deduction subject to 2% floor (with no deduction for AMT purposes) – “gross”

(31)

Tax Issues and/or Consequences

to Attorney’s Client and Defendant

to Attorney s Client and Defendant

• This can lead to bad tax result

- see Spina v Forest Preserve District of Cook County

see Spina v. Forest Preserve District of Cook County,

207 F. Supp.2d 764 (N.D. Ill. 2002) as reported in

2002 National Taxpayer Advocate Report to

Congress at 166.

• See Adam Liptak, ‘‘Tax Bill Exceeds Award to Officer

in Sex Bias Case,’’ The New York Times, Aug. 11,

2002, section 1, p. 18.Cynthia Spina v…

–

This is an illustrative case, this specific case

would differ after Jobs Act, however for non §104

cases that do not have Jobs Act protection, this

would still be the bad tax result

-

Structuring attorney fees can help client by

spreading out attorney fee “income” over a

number of years

(32)

Tax Issues and/or Consequences

to Attorney’s Client and Defendant

to Attorney s Client and Defendant

• Defendant gets deduction, issue is when

• IRS Notice 2003-77 and Maxus Energy Corporation and gy p Subsidiaries v. United States, 31 F.3d 1135 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

– In Notice 2003-77, the Service cited Maxus Energy

Corporation and Subsidiaries v. United States saying that a

“taxpayer’s payment to a settlement fund effectivelytaxpayer s payment to a settlement fund effectively

constitute[s] payment to the person to which the liability [is] owed [if] the claimants agree[ ] to look solely to the fund to satisfy their claims, and therefore, the taxpayer’s payment to the fund discharge[s] its liability to the claimant.” Qualified Settlement Fund (IRC Section 468B)

Se e e u d ( C Sec o 68 )

– Payment by a defendant to an assignment company would be treated as a payment “to the person to which the liability is owed” under Treas. Reg. § 1.461-4(g)(1) if the payment to the assignment company extinguishes the

– Structured attorney fees typically (they should)

involve a novation, therefore a defendant would be able to claim an immediate deduction upon making the lump payment to the assignment company extinguishes the

defendant’s liability to the claimant.

to claim an immediate deduction upon making the lump sum payment to the assignment company, just as if the defendant had instead paid that lump sum amount

(33)

Tax Issues and/or Consequences

to Attorney’s Client and Defendant

• Defendant’s Insurer get deduction

to Attorney s Client and Defendant

g

when paid

– Whether directly to plaintiff/claimant,

– To a QSF, or

– Structured Attorney Fee, or

Structured Attorney Fee, or

– Structured Settlement

• See IRC Sections

831-832

(34)

Structured

S ttl

t

(35)

Why Talk About

S

?

• Must be completed at time of settlement

Structured Settlements?

p

– After docs signed it is too late!

• Often offered by defense

– Understand what is being offered

– Resource to call to evaluate the structure

being offered

• Plaintiff/plaintiff attorney can and

should have own structured

settlement consultant

• Understand Benefits

• Understand Limitations

(36)

The Settlement Industry

• Approximately 600 full-time structured

settlement consultants nationwide

The Settlement Industry

• Most are primarily “defense” oriented

– But, most also work with plaintiffs

• Plaintiff only brokers

– Plaintiff has right to their own consultant

O l

l li

d

lt

t

• Only properly licensed consultants

can offer structured settlements

– Not unlicensed financial planners, brokers, etc.

• Structured settlements are

specialized

• Trade Association: National

Trade Association: National

Structured Settlements Trade

Association (www.nssta.org)

(37)

Structured Settlement

• The settlement of a claim or a

lawsuit through cash payments

th t

d

i

t ll

t

that are made on an installment

or periodic basis

• Usually a mix of immediate

cash and deferred lump

sums and/or monthly

payments

(38)

Structured Settlement Benefits

• Eliminate the risk of mismanagement. According to one recent study, approximately 90% spend all their settlement money within five years.

Structured Settlement Benefits

y y

• Provide tax advantages. Fixed annuity payments from a qualified structured settlement are tax-free to the

annuitant under current IRS rules.

• Provide a steady, low-risk source of money.

Structures eliminate the expense and worry of managing large sums.

Off ti th l

• Customized payments. Structures offer a

• Offer more money over time than a lump sum.

Fixed annuity payments can continue for life – no matter how long the claimant lives.

p y

convenient way to meet the individual

claimant’s needs and special circumstances.

• Maximize settlement benefits. In cases where the defendant has low insurance policy where the defendant has low insurance policy limits, a structured settlement can often provide a more generous overall settlement.

(39)

Structured Settlement Benefits

Tax-free

• Structured Settlement funds are exempt from federal

d t t i t Y id th t b d

Structured Settlement Benefits

and state income taxes. You can avoid the tax burden that comes with investment earnings on a cash

settlement. Over time, a structured settlement ensures significant tax savings and maximizes the value of the settlement proceeds.

settlement proceeds.

No market risk

• Exposure to market risks is eliminated along with the potential for investment failures. The annuity provider absorbs any risk of market and interest rate fluctuations absorbs any risk of market and interest rate fluctuations, and the dollar amount of the claimant’s payments is guaranteed, year after year.

Money is available when the claimant needs it most

• Annuity payments may be designed and timed to meet the claimant’s needs now and decades from now. They are assured that funds will be there specifically for medical and educational expenses, for basic living requirements and for specialized for basic living requirements, and for specialized healthcare needs that may arise in the future as a

(40)

Structured Settlement Benefits for Minors

Safety and Security

• Brook-Hollow Financial only represents life insurance markets

Structured Settlement Benefits for Minors

y p

that have secured A++ or A+ ratings from the A.M. Best Company.

• Structured settlements are not subject to the claims of creditors. • Structured settlements relieve the burden and expense of

money management, investment decisions, and management fees.

• Structured settlements are protected by strict government regulations.

Flexible

• The benefit payment streams can be designed to meet the future financial needs of the minor.

Examples include: funding a college education,

lifetime guaranteed payments guaranteed lump sum lifetime guaranteed payments, guaranteed lump sum payments, and even future retirement planning.

(41)

Structured Settlement Benefits for Minors

Eliminate the Risk of Mismanagement

• Because benefits to be paid under a fixed annuity are calculated in

d th l i tiff h th it f k i th t t

Structured Settlement Benefits for Minors

advance, the plaintiffs have the security of knowing the exact amount and payment dates of their periodic payments. Structured settlements provide tax free payments. There is no tax due on the principal or

earnings distributed to the plaintiff, or their beneficiaries. (IRC §104(a))

Additi l b fit

Additional benefits

• Courts often insist on structures for minors because structures

guarantee the highest rate of return of any investment and the funds are set aside solely for the benefit of the minor; the structure cannot be invaded by unscrupulous individuals.

be invaded by unscrupulous individuals.

• There is no need to post a bond or for annual reporting by the parent or guardian.

• It is virtually impossible for the minor to dissipate the settlement • It is virtually impossible for the minor to dissipate the settlement

funds once they have attained the age of majority.

• The minor is still eligible for financial assistance in college. • Structures provide an ongoing legacy from a parent to • Structures provide an ongoing legacy from a parent to

(42)

Structured Settlements Are Also Useful When

Dealing With Claimants Who Have Special Needs

• Significant, ongoing medical expenses;

• Rehabilitation or permanent care

facility expenses;

• College tuition, retirement income,

the down payment on a home or a

mortgage payment, and;

• Replacement of monthly income,

annual income or supplemental

income.

• Workers compensation claims; and

(43)

Insurance Companies Offering

p

g

Structured Settlements

Company Name A.M. Best Rating - Size

All t t Lif I C A XV

• Allstate Life Insurance Company A+ XV

• American General Life Insurance Company A XV

• John Hancock Life Insurance Company A+ XV

• Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston A X

• Metropolitan Life Insurance Companyp p y A+ XV

• New York Life Insurance Company A++ XV

• Pacific Life and Annuity Company A+ XV

• Prudential Insurance Company of America A+ XV

(44)

Structured Settlements Can Be Used In

Tax-Free OR Taxable Recovery Cases

• Tax-free Cases

– IRC Section 104

IRC Section 104

• All payments ever received

are free form federal income

taxation

• Taxable Recovery Cases

y

(45)

Involve Structured Settlement

Consultant Early

Minimal Basic Data Needed

• Case Profile Fact Sheet

Case Profile Fact Sheet

• Medical reports –

admission/discharge summaries

• Plaintiff’s life care plan

p

• Economist’s report

(46)