• No results found

351_mid3af12.pdf

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "351_mid3af12.pdf"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Econometrics

Fall 2012

Midterm Exam 3 – Solutions

Statement of Academic Honesty:

This exam entirely reflects my own work. I have not given assistance to anyone, nor have I received assistance from anyone. I am not aware that any other students have done so.

Signature: __________________________________________________

Name: __________________________________________________

(2)

The question is asking about an interaction effect – whether the effect of athletic participation on grades is different for men and for women. The correct model is

( )

The EViews output is:

Dependent Variable: COLGPA Method: Least Squares Date: 12/11/12 Time: 16:19 Sample: 1 4137

Included observations: 4137

White heteroskedasticity-consistent standard errors & covariance

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 2.608557 0.014846 175.7064 0.0000 ATHLETE -0.301577 0.048729 -6.188822 0.0000 FEMALE 0.124853 0.020795 6.003888 0.0000 ATHLETE*FEMALE 0.196389 0.106363 1.846398 0.0649

R-squared 0.018842 Mean dependent var 2.652686 Adjusted R-squared 0.018129 S.D. dependent var 0.658635 S.E. of regression 0.652637 Akaike info criterion 1.985375 Sum squared resid 1760.390 Schwarz criterion 1.991494 Log likelihood -4102.749 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.987540 F-statistic 26.45599 Durbin-Watson stat 1.946987 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

The coefficient on ATHLETE is negative, but the coefficient on the interaction term is positive. This means that being on an athletic team is associated with a lower GPA, but that the effect is smaller for women than for men. Specifically, athletic performance is associated with a decline in GPA for men, but a decline of for women.

(3)

a. should be positive because of inflation – 1989 prices are higher than 1980 prices in general.

b. Using period fixed effects, but no cross-section fixed effects, the estimated coefficient is

̂ . Each 1% increase in the percentage of students in a town’s population is associated with a 0.5% increase in rent.

c. Using both period and cross-section fixed effects, the estimated coefficient is ̂

. Each 1% increase in the percentage of students in a town’s population is associated with a 1.12% increase in rent.

d. The marginal effect of adding students to a town is to increase the rents charged by a fairly large amount. However, if such towns are less pleasant places to live in general, then comparing between towns will dampen the effect (i.e. no town fixed effects).

However, within the town, we see a larger effect on the rent (i.e. with town fixed effects).

Problem 3

a. Parental support clearly affects a student’s school performance since students who get more support at home do better in school. It could be correlated with GIRLHS since parents who support their children academically are more likely to be willing to pay private school tuition. Thus, GIRLHS could “pick up” the effect of having supportive and interested parents rather than the effect of the girls’ high school itself.

b. ̂ would be too large, since it would “pick up” the effect both of supportive and interested parents and the effect of attending a girls’ high school.

(4)

a. ( )

b. ( )

c.

d.

e.

f.

g. ( ) . Evidently, the coefficient on a dummy variable in a logit regression is the natural log of the odds ratio.

(5)

a. Using OLS, the estimated coefficient is ̂ . Each 1% increase in the fare is associated with a 0.39% decline in the number of passengers. This is the estimate for price elasticity of demand.

b. Regressing ( ) on and the other two exogenous regressor ( ) and

[ ( )] gives an F-statistic . This is the first-stage regression and thus the instrument is relevant. The economic interpretation is just that a higher level of

concentration by a single large firm allows the firm to exercise market power and raise the price.

c. Yes – Market concentration is exogenous to the factors creating error in the demand

equation. Consumers don’t care about market concentration as such, only to the extent to which it affects price.

d. Using TSLS, the estimated coefficient is ̂ . Each 1% increase in the fare is associated with a 1.17% decline in the number of passengers.

References

Related documents

The performance shaping factors (PSF) are used to increase or decrease the probability of an error occurring. There are 8 PSFs that are discussed in the SPAR-H protocol used in

In models with non-homothetic, non-CRRA utility functions the exchange rate change depends not only on the standard (“average”) inflation differential across countries (as in the

Kendra houses calculated from the Moon in this example, are the fifth (first house calculated from the Moon), eighth (fourth house calculated from the Moon), eleventh (seventh

calcium-dependent release of gliotransmitters that control synaptic transmission and plasticity has led to the establishment of a new concept in synaptic physiology, the

The next secondary research question (1-b) was to examine the relationships between the eight variables of knowledge management capabilities: technology, structure,

http://www.rhodesia.co.za/Images/large/RA9405.jpg : “½d, vertical pair across the horizontal interpanneau, upper stamp imperforate to margin.. Very fine used on piece cancelled

(ii) This stimulation-specific firing rate increase in neocortex, in turn drives corresponding stimulation-specific hippocampal units to move their firing forward in the phase