• No results found

Dispersion penalty test 1550 Serial

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Dispersion penalty test 1550 Serial"

Copied!
18
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Dispersion penalty test

– 1550 Serial –

Dispersion penalty test

– 1550 Serial –

Peter Öhlen & Krister Fröjdh

Optillion

(2)

SMF Transmission at 1550 nm

SMF Transmission at 1550 nm

• Different from multi-mode transmission

– Dispersion [ps/nm/km] is the important figure

• RMS spectral width is not critical here

• The transmitter chirp is important

– laser wavelength changes with modulation

– combination of chirp and dispersion gives a penalty

• We need to test this

– measurement of dispersion penalty is the most straight forward way to do this

(3)

Simulation results:

DFB-EA @ 1550 nm after 40 km SMF

Simulation results:

DFB-EA @ 1550 nm after 40 km SMF

• Results from a simulation program in MatLab • Simulation program freely available (but MatLab costs $) Transmission over 40 km SMF 0 1 2 3 4 -1 -0,5 0 0,5 1 Chirp parameter Ve rtic al Ey e Closure [dB]

This does not show up in any measurement

standardized so far Equal RMS spectral width

(4)

Outline of the TX & RX tests

Outline of the TX & RX tests

• Idea: Simulate worst-case conditions

• RX test as in 1 GbE

– uses a stressed eye

– shape of the stressed eye might need modifications

• TX test is new, applies to 1550 serial:

– degradation from dispersion and chirp ! dispersion penalty

– test the TX with: test fiber + golden RX

(5)

Some definitions and parameters

Some definitions and parameters

3 nm redundant RMS Spectral width dBm -19.4 Psens Nominal sensitivity (OMA/2)

dB ERmin

Extinction ratio (min)

dB 2

Link margin

Dispersion penalty (max) Link insertion loss

dB 3 DPmax dB 13 IL

(6)

TX TP3 Golden RX Test Fiber P2 BER

TX test at TP3 – dispersion penalty

TX test at TP3 – dispersion penalty

Attenuator

Measure PDUT = (P2 at TP3 for BER=10-12)

S = sensitivity (10-12) of the golden RX Jitter input

Pass condition:

– DP = max(PDUT - S, 0) < DPmax = 3 dB

(7)

Tx Ptx & ER

Transmitter test at TP2

Transmitter test at TP2

Measure Ptx, ER (?) and eye mask (?)

Eye mask test

Pass conditions:

– Ptx > Psens + IL + DP + margin = -4.4 dBm + DP – ER > ERmin

– ”eye mask pass” (might not be needed if jitter test is included in the dispersion test)

(8)

Test fiber characteristics

Test fiber characteristics

• A G.652 fiber with total dispersion larger than the worst-case 40km G.652 dispersion. The test fiber can be longer than 40km.

• Attenuation as small as possible to avoid use of ER-amplifier (a good fiber spool should be OK)

• Define dispersion measurement method for making the golden fiber: e.g. TIA/EIA-455-175A.

ps/nm λ 1300 λ 4 093 . 0 40 ) λ ( 3 4       − > D 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750 760 1530 1535 1540 1545 1550 1555 1560 Dispe rsion [ps /n m ] Wavelength [nm]

(9)

How to make the test fiber

How to make the test fiber

1. Get a fiber longer than 40 km

– long should ensure that the total dispersion larger than required

2. Measure the dispersion of the fiber over the wavelength region of interest

3. If the total dispersion of the fiber is too large, cut back the fiber to lower the total dispersion

4. Verify that the total dispersion of the fiber is large enough

– if necessary, return to step 3

(10)

Golden receiver

Golden receiver

• Reference receiver with clock recovery

• Sensitivity should be at least as good as the 10 GbE RX

• Decision threshold at average signal level • (*) Bandwidth ??

• (*) Possibly with jitter input on the recovered clock.

– Can this be implemented with commercially available equipment ??

• (*) Standard Bessel filter

– another filter type might be more appropriate – the filter characteristic should be defined

Golden RX

(11)

Golden Tx

Golden Rx calibration

Golden Rx calibration

Golden Rx Golden RX S BER Attenuator

Measure the sensitivity S of the golden RX for BER=10-12. (Without jitter input)

(12)

Golden Tx

Golden Tx

• High bandwidth (>15 GHz) modulator

• High quality eye, test for:

– Symmetry and eye mask

– Vertical eye closure < 0.5 dB in the center 20 % of the eye

– (*) Rise/fall times < xx ps ??

– (*) Vertical eye closure < yy dB ?? – (*) Total jitter < zz dB ??

• Chirp unimportant

• Moderate power needed

Golden Tx

(13)

Action points for this test ….

Action points for this test ….

• Test pattern for the penalty measurement

– PRBS 223-1

• (*) Golden RX filter characteristics

– Not obvious what the desired characteristics are

• (*) Decide on the amount of jitter introduced

in the golden RX for the transmitter test

– Is the TX eye mask test necessary ??

• (*) Can we test other thing in the same test ??

• (*) Cut-off frequencies for the RX (upper,

(14)

Things not covered by the test

Things not covered by the test

• For some parameters it is very difficult to

generate a worst case condition

– RIN and feedback sensitivity: This is dependent in a complicated way on the phase, polarisation,

reflectance and distance to the feedback. – Polarization Mode Dispersion

• These degradations give penalties which

have to be accounted for separately in the

link budget

(15)

Simulation of compliance tests

Simulation of compliance tests

• Vary chirp parameters of the TX

– simple model of DFB-EA is used

• Vary bandwidth and filter order of RX

– filter type is a bessel filter of order 1 – 4 – bandwidth is 5.5 – 10.5 GHz

• Take TXs and RXs that barely pass the tests

• Test every TX with every RX over a 40 km link

• Calculate the link margin for each combination

(16)

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Link margin [dB] C ount

Simulated link margin for

”good” components

Simulated link margin for

”good” components

• The mean link margin is close to 2 dB

• There is a spread, but few combinations give a margin < 1.5 dB

(17)

Summary

Summary

• RX test similar to 1 GbE, might need

modified shape of the stressed eye

• TX test with golden fiber

– is a test for dispersion and chirp

– other penalties like RIN are still allocated

for in the link budget

(18)

Why trade off dispersion penalty and

output power ?

Why trade off dispersion penalty and

output power ?

• In general: Margin = (Ptx – IL – DP) – Psens • First proposal: (DP < 3 dB ) & (Ptx > 0 dBm)

• We can do someting better than this:

– Require margin > 2 dB ! P – max(DP,0) > -3 dBm

NO

YES

PASS with current condition

3 dB 2 dB Margin -18 dBm Sensitivity (non-stressed) 13 dB Link loss 0.5 dB 3 dB Dispersion penalty -1.5 dBm 0 dBm Ptx TX #2 TX #1 Comparison of 2 transmitters: Thi s tra nsc eiver wou ld w ork very go od Ba ckup

References

Related documents

Adult &amp; Youth Community-based Services Youth Residential Services (Compass) School-Based Services Satellite Offices Director, Parkland Tina Erlendson Impaired Driving

The NSQAP, the Biochemical Mass Spectrometry Laboratory (BMSL), the Molecular Quality Improvement Program (MQIP) and the Newborn Screening Translation Research Initiative

By aggregating de-identified personal health information, HHS could potentially eliminate its current reliance on separate lagging administrative reporting systems from state

17% of MIT undergraduate students patent an invention within 15 years of graduation; On average, MIT alumni inventors produce six patents each. MIT engineers are 5x

In the next section we introduce the theory of Complex Adaptive Systems which helps to un- derstand how successful agile software projects and teams function and work.. After that

The goal is to increase access to finance for agriculture value chains (including livestock but excluding cotton, a sector which already receives support from commercial

Standard: Each patient will be informed of the Patient Bill of Rights. Standard: Patients will be treated in a safe environment. Standard: Patients seeking comprehensive care will

Boiling Point: No data available Flashpoint: No data available Ignition Temperature: No data available Auto-ignition Temperature: No data available Lower Explosion Limit: