F
ixed income investing has rarely been more demanding for investors. In response to the unique confluence of secular and cyclical challenges facing the global economy, central banks across the G7 economies have lowered official rates to 1% or below, and longer-term government yields have declined sharply. Other high-quality fixed income assets – for which government bonds serve as the yield benchmark – have followed suit: some investment grade corporate bonds are paying yields last seen in the mid-1960s.With high-quality yields so low, the focus on income generation has naturally led investors to other asset classes. However, there are still segments of the bond market with strong income potential for which the long-term investment case is
compelling – but investing in them means removing the shackles from your fixed income allocation.
High-Yield Corporates
One way investors are increasing the yield potential from their fixed income allocations is by adjusting the quality constraints on their corporate credit allocations to allow below-investment-grade bonds and loans. Non-financial corporate balance sheets, in contrast to those of banks, are solid at this stage of the credit cycle: leverage has been steadily reduced; debt, at 3.9x earnings, is a full multiple lower than two years ago; and liquidity is very strong, with the ratio of liquid assets to short-term liabilities at the highest levels since the 1950s1 in 2012.
The relative strength of high-yield issuers reflects a combination of expense discipline, cautious investment spending and earnings retention. It is also indicative of progress by corporates in using improved liquidity conditions and strong end-investor demand to
1 Source: Federal Reserve, Flow of Funds Report, December 2011
Currents
Loosening the Bonds
Rethinking your Fixed Income Allocation
by DAvID GIBBON
David Gibbon is an investment strategist in BlackRock’s Fixed Income Portfolio Management Group. FOR PROFESSIONAL INvESTORS ONLYterm out short-dated debt and minimise refinancing risk (see Chart 1).
These stronger credit fundamentals translate into a positive picture on defaults and ratings migration. High-yield default rates remain at historically low levels – just 1.9% of the universe by volume defaulted in the 12 months ending November 2011, compared to a long-term annual average of around 4.5%. Rising credit costs and the
weakening growth picture in 2012 will likely translate into higher defaults, but our current projection is only for a modest increase to 2.7% this year. The yield premium earned on high-yield bonds is primarily
compensation for this default risk. Broad US high-yield indices ended 2011 with a yield of 8.4%,
representing a yield advantage of 700bp over government bonds. While this spread is less than half the level seen in late 2008, adjusting spreads
for expected losses due to
downgrade and default shows that true credit risk premia are only about 25% lower than their previous highs in this cycle, and significantly above prior cycle peaks.
Another way to think about the relationship between credit spreads and defaults is to consider the cumulative default rate on a portfolio of high-yield corporate bonds that would cause a hold-to-maturity investor to lose money compared to holding a portfolio of risk-free assets. Based on today’s pricing, defaults would have to exceed 44% over the next five years (assuming a 40% recovery rate) for the high yield portfolio would underperform2. Since 1970, the highest historical level of five-year cumulative defaults for high-yield issuers was 31%, which occured in the early 2000s. For investors with a longer-term
investment horizon, high-yield bonds provide more than ample
compensation for default risk and
2 Using constituents and pricing for CDX-HY S17 as at 31 December 2011
Chart 1: Change in High Yield and Loan Maturity Schedule ($Bn) over the Past Three Years
Change in maturity schedule, $bn Maturity year -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 2017 2018+
reflect in some part a generally lower risk appetite associated with policy risks and difficult liquidity conditions around year-end. (see Chart 2). It is worth noting that the bank loan market is also attractive at present. Loans pay coupons that are indexed to LIBOR and typically offer greater protection to investors through covenants and collateral security. Steep yield curves and the value of seniority in the capital structure tend to translate into lower running yields than those available on unsecured bonds. The loan market has been less in demand recently given that short-term interest rates are projected to remain constant for the near term. But with a yield to maturity of just under 7% and a current coupon yield around 5%, loans represent an attractive source of income for investors concerned about the potential for rising rates at some stage in this market cycle. Additionally, the secured nature of loans means that, in the event of
bankruptcy, investor losses can be significantly lower than they are for unsecured lenders. Historically, recovery rates on loans have averaged around 70% compared to 40% on unsecured high-yield bonds, making them a more defensive investment for investors who are less confident on the global growth outlook and require additional protection against losses in a worsening credit market cycle.
Emerging Market Debt
Another compelling opportunity for income investors is to reduce their regional bias to home markets, where funding pressures on sovereign issuers have become intense, and broaden their allocation to emerging market (EM) debt. Sovereign credit concerns in developed markets (DMs) are, broadly speaking, a function of too much debt, too little growth in the medium and long term due to
deleveraging and weak
demographics, and less flexibility to offset the growth impact of fiscal
Chart 2: High-Yield Spread vs Default-Adjusted Risk Premium
High yield spread Default adjusted risk premium 400 200 0 600 800 1000 1200 B as is p oi n ts 1400 1600 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2011
tightening as policy options are largely exhausted.
Emerging markets present a different story. Gross sovereign debt is lower and economic growth is higher than in advanced economies, and a combination of stronger productivity growth and favourable demographics ensure it will stay that way. At the same time, higher real rates give monetary policymakers more room to respond should growth slow.
EM governments fund themselves in capital markets in two main forms: external debt denominated in US dollars or other hard currencies, and domestic debt issued in the local currency of the issuer country. External EM bonds are credit instruments whose ratings and risk premia reflect the ability of sovereign issuers to service obligations in a currency other than the ones they control – and credit fundamentals for these issuers have been steadily improving over the past decade. EM countries have much healthier
fiscal balances than their DM counterparts and debt issuance to fund these smaller deficits should be easily absorbed by the market. Many EM countries, particularly the commodity exporters, have shifted to a net external creditor position over the past decade, and the strong growth in foreign exchange reserves will provide a powerful defence against external shocks.
These developments have driven an average three-notch rating upgrade of EM sovereigns over the past 10 years, with the result that external EM debt is now an investment-grade-rated asset class. And with concerns around the solvency of some DM sovereigns, and their ability to refinance maturing debt in public markets questionable, rating convergence with the DM sovereign universe is likely to continue for years. This move to the investment-grade mainstream for external debt has meant that correlations with other investment grade assets have risen, and today the sector offers
Chart 3: Positive Real Yields are More Prevalent in Em Markets
Developed (IPM GBI Global weights)
Real yield (%)
Emerging
(IPM GBIEM Global Div weights)
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
only a small increase in yield over lower-rated investment-grade corporate bonds. But for investment grade credit investors, external EM debt can be a useful and diversifying yield generator (see Chart 3).
That said, external EM debt is a mature asset class with relatively little new issuance. EM
governments are increasingly funding themselves in local currency debt, meeting growing demand both domestically, as pension systems develop in some key markets, and internationally, as investors seek greater diversification. Unlike external debt, for which access to foreign currency to service the debt represents a risk to the issuer, currency risk on local debt is borne by the investor. As a consequence, volatility in foreign exchange rates is a significant contributor to the risk of the asset class.
Over the last ten years, a US dollar-based investor in local currency EM debt earned an annualised total
return of 13%, with 11% annual return volatility. Attributing these returns to movements in interest rates and currencies (as in Chart 3), demonstrates the dominance of foreign exchange risk and the comparatively better risk-adjusted return contribution from interest rate risk. The higher yields available on local currency debt are largely a function of the carry associated with the foreign currency exposure; hedging out this foreign exchange risk is a costly exercise given the large interbank rate differentials between EM and DM markets. For investors with a positive view on EM exchange rates who can tolerate the foreign exchange volatility, however, local currency debt can be another important source of portfolio yield.
Growing Opportunities in Securitised Bonds
Opportunities to invest in other higher-yielding sectors of the fixed income markets could emerge over the next year or two as banks work to
Chart 4: Cumulative Contribution to Gbi-Em Returns
FX returns Bond returns 20 0 -20 40 60 80 100 120 140 % 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
shrink bloated balance sheets by disposing of risky assets. One area we continue to monitor is the market for non-agency securitised bonds backed by residential and
commercial mortgages, where new issue supply is limited and liquidity can be challenging.
The fundamental picture for the real estate loan sector is more
challenging than for the other
sectors we consider here. Residential property prices in the US are likely to remain under pressure in 2012, and a combination of growing negative equity and weak household income gains should keep default rates high, while delinquencies on commercial property loans remain elevated despite two years of steady declines.
An investment approach that
balances the need for yield with some protection against principal loss should focus on collateral quality and seniority in the capital structure. Yields are reasonably attractive on these bonds – US prime RMBS carry yields of around 6.5% today, and US and European CMBS offer yield spreads of 5% over benchmarks on bonds with sufficient credit subordination to insulate investors from loss, even in adverse cases. However, given the weak
fundamental picture and the
potential for bank selling in less liquid conditions, we see few catalysts for performance in the near term. Watch and wait for more attractive entry points in this sector. t
Currents
Published by BlackRock, Inc. Please direct story ideas, comments and questions to: Nicholas Loney
Telephone +44 (0)20 7743 1895 Facsimile +44 (0)20 7743 1000 nicholas.loney@blackrock.com Find Currents on the web at
blackrock.com/currents
To subscribe, visit
blackrock.com/subscribe/currents
Important information
1. This material is for distribution only to those types of recipients as provided below and should not be relied upon by any other persons. Circulation must be restricted accordingly. This material is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation in any jurisdiction in which such solicitation is unlawful or to any person to whom it is unlawful. Moreover, it neither constitutes an offer to enter into an investment agreement with the recipient of this document nor an invitation to respond to it by making an offer to enter into an investment agreement.
2. This material may contain forward-looking information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections, forecasts, estimates of yields or returns, and proposed or expected portfolio composition. Moreover, certain historical performance information other investment vehicles or composite accounts managed by BlackRock have been included in this material and such performance information is presented by way of example only. No representation is made that the performance presented will be achieved by any BlackRock funds, or that every assumption made in achieving, calculating or presenting either the forward-looking information or the historical performance information herein has been considered or stated in preparing this material. Any changes to assumptions that may have been made in preparing this material could have a material impact on the investment returns that are presented herein by way of example. 3. This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of 1 February 2012 and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources deemed by BlackRock to be reliable, are not necessarily all inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Any investments named with this material may not necessarily be held in any accounts managed by BlackRock. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. Past performances is no guarantee to future results. 4. This material is issued in the UK by BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited (authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Services Authority). Registered office: 12 Throgmorton Avenue, London, EC2N 2DL. Registered in England No. 2020394. Tel: +44 20 7743 3000. For your protection, telephone calls are usually recorded. BlackRock is the trading name of BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited and BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited. In Hong Kong, the information provided is issued by BlackRock (Hong Kong) Limited and is only for distribution to professional investors (as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance [Cap. 571 of the laws of Hong Kong and any rules made under the Ordinance]). In Singapore, the information provided is distributed by BlackRock (Singapore) Limited (company registration no. 200010143N) and is for distribution to institutional investors (as defined in Section 4A of the Securities and Future Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (the SFA)
and accredited investors (as defined in section 4A of the SFA) only). In Brunei, Malaysia and Thailand, this document is provided in a private and confidential manner to institutional investors only. This material is issued in the United Arab Emirates by BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited – Dubai Branch which is regulated in the UAE by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA). It is directed at professional clients only within the meaning of the rules of the DFSA and no other person should rely upon the information contained within it. For distribution in EMEA, Korea and Taiwan for Professional Investors only (or professional clients, as such term may apply in the relevant jurisdictions). BlackRock Investment Management (Taiwan) Limited is an independent legal entity, which is located at 28F, 95 Tun Hwa South Road, Section 2, Taipei, Taiwan. Tel (02)23261600. In Japan, this material is not for use with individual investors. This material may be distributed/issued in Canada, Australia and New Zealand by BlackRock Financial Management Inc. (BFM), which is registered as an International Advisor with the Ontario Securities Commission. In Australia, BFM is exempted under ASIC Class Order 03/1100 from the requirement to hold an Australian Financial Services Licence and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under US Laws, which differ from Australian laws. In New Zealand, this presentation is offered to institutional and wholesale clients only. It does not constitute an offer of securities to the public in New Zealand for the purpose of New Zealand securities law. BFM believes that the information in this document is correct at the time of compilation, but no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by BFM, its officers, employees or agents. This document contains general information only and is not intended to represent general or specific investment advice. The information does not take into account your financial circumstances. An assessment should be made as to whether the information is appropriate for you having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs.
In Latin America, for Institutional Investors only. It is possible that some of the funds mentioned or inferred to in this material have not been registered with the securities regulator of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay or any other securities regulator in any Latin American country, and thus, might not be publicly offered within any such country. The securities regulators of such countries have not confirmed the accuracy of any information contained herein. No information discussed herein can be provided to the general public in Latin America.
BlackRock® is a registered trademark of BlackRock, Inc. © 2012 BlackRock, Inc. All Rights reserved. BLACKROCK, BLACKROCK SOLUTIONS, ALADDIN, iSHARES, LIFEPATH, SO WHAT DO I DO WITH MY MONEY, INVESTING FOR A NEW WORLD, and BUILT FOR THESE TIMES are registered and unregistered trademarks of BlackRock, Inc. or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere. All other trademarks are those of their respective owners.