• No results found

Knowledge based acquisition of tradeoff preferences of negotiating agents

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Knowledge based acquisition of tradeoff preferences of negotiating agents"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Knowledge-Based Acquisition of Tradeoff Preferences for

Negotiating Agents

Xudong Luo, Nicholas R. Jennings, and Nigel Shadbolt

Department of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton

Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.

ABSTRACT

Æ

!

"

" "

#

$

%

1. INTRODUCTION

& '

'

()*+ ,

-

.()/+

0

"

Æ

123

The Fifth International Conference on Electronic Commerce

2003

Pitts-burgh, USA

4

.

0 5

#

6

7

8

"

"

"

.

0

.

0

.(9+0

"

.

0 7 "

(:)+

"

(:;+ "

$

6

(2)

" 7

"

$ .)0""

-.:0

"

.

(): )? )> ); :9 )= *+ 0

&

. 0

"

Æ

5

7

=;

.

())+0

@ AA

- "

.

0 B"

6

" &

Æ

:

7 >=

7 *

7 9

57 <

2. KNOWLEDGE-BASED ACQUISITION

5 )

5

" 7

5

5 "

.(:)+0

5

$

C

5

.

0 5

"

"

" 4

"

(:/ >; >)+ 5 "

"

(:)+

$ .)0

.:0

5 "

D5 EF

EF B&F G

(3)

!

"

#

#

#

"

4

" 4

(:<+

"

" "

$ .)0 $

"

.:0 $

.>0 $

.?0 $

6

.=0$

.

0 .*0 $

.

0

3. THE QUALITY TRADEOFF

$

)

-

5 "

>>;. 0

)=

. =;H 0

:=;. :?H0

>>;:=;E<;

-

E :*9

)=I)=E>;'

6 .

6

= 0

:

5 "

>>;

. 0

);

. >>H 0

)=;. =?H0

>

"

,AA

2AA

(4)

>>;

. 0

)*

. =>H 0 )=?

. =>H0

5 (+

(+ ; 7

$ (+

(+

E. 0

. 0. 0

- .)0

E. 0

. 0.

0

- .:0

E. 0

E

. 0. 0

.>0

.)0$

. 0. 0

. 0. 0

-.?0

.:0 $

.

0. 0

. 0. 0

-.=0

.>0$

.

0. 0

E

. 0. 0

E

.*0

. 0. 0

E. 0

!

!

0

4 (;)+$

.;=)+

.)

0 7

(;;=0

. ;

0

$

) (;)+

$(+(+

(;)+

.0 E

.0 E E

. 0

(+

E

. 0!

"

E

. 0!

#

E

"

"

) $ (;)+

(+ (+

E

.0

)

I .;=)+

.0

)

I (;;=+

(5)

5 "

$

E

.0I

.0

)

.

.0I0

IE

:

I

=;H .

0

:=H.

0

E

.0I

.0

)

.

.0I0

IE

:

I

=;H .

0

9=H.

0

& .90

(;>>;+(;):+(;>;+

5

. >>;

;0- .

): ; 0-

.

>;;0 .90

.0.0

$

E

):

)

.;=)+

):

)

(;

;=+-.<0

.0

.0

E

>;

)

.;=)+

>;

)

(;;=+

./0

5 5 : ./0

$

4

!

4

.<0

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

α

=11/12

α

=5/6

α

=3/4

α

=2/3

α

=7/12

α

=1/12

α

=1/6

α

=1/4

α

=1/3

α

=5/12

rate (pound)

distance (minute)

+

x is more important

*

x is equally important

.

x is less important

.0

0

100

200

300

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

relative importance degree

rate (pound)

distance (minute)

.0

$

4

!

4

J

7

(6)

4

4. THE IMPASSE TRADEOFFS

5 "

- : .;=)+ $(+(+ .0E

.0E $ (+

E . 0

(;)+

( +. 0E .);0

(0.+

.))0

(0

.):0 .+ .)>0

( 0

. 0 . 0 .)?0 . + . 0 . 0 .)=0 .);0 -.))0 -.):0 - .)>0 -.)?0 "

-.)=0

" : (+ (+.;=)+ E

.0

) I . + ( +

.0

) I ( 0 .)*0

E.0

)

I .)90

E.0

) I.)<0

& .)*0

5 .)*0

.0.0$

E ): )

.>>;.).

0 0>;;+ (>>;. 0 >>;.). 0 0+ ): ) (;>>;. 0 0-.)/0 .0 .0$ E >; )

.>>;.).

0 0>;;+ (>>;. 0 >>;.). 0 0+ >; ) (;>>;. 0 0-.:;0

.)/0E

E* E ): ) .>>; >;;+

* (>>;

>>; + ): ) (;>>; 0-.:)0

.:;0 E

E*

.0 .0

$ E >; ) .>>; >;;+

)= (>>;.>>;

>>; + >; ) (;>>; 0 .::0

5 .5 >0

$

4.

(7)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

rate (pound)

period (month)

.0

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

rate (pound)

distance (minute)

.0

%

4 . *

)=

0

.

>>;0

4

5 "

"

-

-

5. THE ADAPTIVE TRADEOFF

5 ".)0

- .:0

.>0

> (;;=0

$(+(+ .0E

.0E $ $(+(+ .0E

.0E E. 0

(;)+

( +

.:>0

(

0.

+

.:?0

(0

.:=0

.

+

.:*0

( 0

. 0

. 0

.:90

.+

. 0

. 0

.:<0

.:>0

- .:?0

- .:=0

.

0- .:*0

.

0- .:90

" - .:<0

"

> (+

(8)

% E

.0

)

I . +

. 0I ( +

.0

)

I ( 0

.:/0

E.0

)

I .>;0

E.0

)

I .>)0

& .:/0

3 (;)+

.:/0 .0 E ): ) .>>;>>;+ . 0 .>>; 0I):.) 0 (>>; >>; + ): ) (;>>; 0-.>:0 .0

.0 $

E >; ) .>>; >>;+ . 0 .>>; 0I>;.) 0 (>>;>>;+ >; ) (;>>;0 .>>0

.>:0 .>>0 E

E E

.0 $

E ): ) . >>;>>;+ >>; I ( >>; >>;+ ): ) (; >>;0 -.>?0 :;H :;H

.>?0.>=0 E

): E

>>; E

): E >>;

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

rate (pound)

period (month)

.0

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

rate (pound)

distance (minute)

.0 & " .0

.0 $

E >; ) . >>;>>;+ >>;

I* (

>>; >>;+ >; ) (; >>;0 .>=0

5 .5 ?0

$

. 0 .

): >; 0

. 0 .

):

0>;

0

.>>;

0

. 0

(9)

):

>;

0

6

5 "

1J 7

1J

" 7

6 &

6

6. GENERATION RULES

5

$ .)0

.:0

.>0

5

$ .)0

.

0- .:0

. 0 5

$ .)0

. 0-

.:0

. 0

$ .)0

.:0

.>0

"

$

' "()

"()

' "()

"()

*+( .:)0

' "()

"()

*+( .<0

' "()

"()

*+( .>:0

' "()

*+( .<0

E;=

' "()

"()

*+( ./0

' "()

"()

*+( .::0

' "()

"()

*+( ./0

' "()

"()

*+( .>>0

' "()

*+( ./0

E;=

7. RELATED WORK

(10)

5

5 .)0

(:>+

-.:0

" (>+

5 " .)0 ():

)? )>+

- .:0

(); :9 )=+

"

"

.

0

4

-

.

06

4"

"

AA

5 "

(:?+

!$

& (::+ D

G

.

0 " .

0

"

@

(:+ .AA

0

"

"

1 (/+

5(/+

.

Æ 0

"

"

7 (/+

"

&K 6

(/+

.

0 AA.

0 5 (/+

5

()<+

.

0

(?+

$ .)0

.

0

. 0 2

.:0

. 0

(=+

(11)

8. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK

(<+

! (:)+

7

"

!

4

$

L

5 (<+

$ .)0

.:0

.>0

-

!

L

" (:;+

-

"

3

.

0

L $ .)0

-.:0

.

0- .>0

. $ .0 :*;

:;

.0 :9;

=;

@ AA

- "

"

Acknowledgements

123

@ 1 7J

9. REFERENCES

()+ ! '( ) *

! %1 :;;:

%

(:+ @ 52 7B"

+

,* +

-. .:;;;

(>+ M@N"

+ &)

* /%,=:*O=>:

:;;:

(?+ %@ 2JMLP,

4B4%

+ ,*

0/%,

!" :;;>

(=+ MM% 7A&2MQ3 &2

7

$ ,1

'* :;;>

(*+ ! J&M %!M M

!

5J%7

/ 2& *

&/$(+ )//)

$ )/%,)*>O)/>

7:;;)

(9+ 15%7&2MR

/%,

)?:.:0$:;=O:>9:;;:

(<+ 254R3 )

2 @

@ )/<)

(/+ B%5@L7!

(12)

+ ,

*, 0,:;;)

())+ S, M1!%43

$

M!N!

!1 2 /

/,,, :*/) $)

/%,>;>O>)>7:;;>

():+ N1

$ 7

+

,*0/%

,)/>O:;))//<

()>+ N17

$

/%,)?*.:0$)?/O)9>:;;>

()?+ N1M! 7

$ R

+

,*0/%

,)<*O)/>:;;)

()=+ 1N@,M!

1 1

2$.:;;>

()*+ !&2M53L

,&&&

-6&

)=.?0$/<=O);;>:;;>

()9+ 22 &27 B

"$

78'6 +

*:.:0$):/O)=<)//=

()<+ @ 7 B

+ / 2& *

/2&* ( //2/ 4":;;:

()/+ 23 !4 &2M

,16

)):.)0$>)O=* :;;>

(:;+ Q3 &2M&7

$

+ 9,

5(/ 2 & *

! :;;>

(:)+ Q3 &2M&7 53

M!3 AA

/%,)?<.):0 :;;>

(::+ !%

2$

3&:1 R

1 )/??

(:?+ 7L% @L7B%5

7

+*+ 4" 5(0 ,

* &S :;;:

(:=+ J 1) : 1

)/<)

(:*+ 2/ )

R1%R7 )/<:

(:9+ 21NM!

B

5() ///,;"44"

5(+/,*+

/ :;;:

(:<+ ,7 P !

3 -&

2 *-/62

?;>O?)< ! 1:;;;

(:/+ 1 7 @ : /

((, 13)///

(>;+ R)5 /$%

@ 7 )///

(>)+ 2MN ( '

<

References

Related documents

Motivation Knowledge-based Proof Planning Agent-oriented Theorem Proving OMEGA. Methods

were, first, that negotiating agents can track targets better since they can coordinate radar measurements and achieve better triangulation, and, second, that

The key factors that underly knowledge-based systems are knowledge acquisition, knowledge representation, and the application of large bodies of knowledge to the particular

(2013) Knowledge Acquisition in Knowledge Transfer Part- nerships: an Activity Theory based study of business process improve- ment using process mapping.. PhD, University of the

AL-ZAWAHRA, &#34;AUTOMATED KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION FRAMEWORK FOR SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT BASED ON HYBRIDIZATION OF CASE BASED REASONING AND INTELLIGENT AGENT,&#34;

Knowledge acquisition constitutes an ontology development activity (Gómez-Pérez et al. It is of particular importance in methods for ontology new development, which do not

Role-limiting approaches support knowledge acquisition (KA) by centering knowledge base construction on common types of tasks or domain-independent problem-solving strategies. Within

Motivation for the study: To understand the remuneration preferences for the retention of a group of knowledge workers within a large organisation based in South Africa.. The