• No results found

Chandoul

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Chandoul"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Journal of Algebra Combinatorics Discrete Structures and Applications

On the norms of

r

−circulant matrices with generalized

Fibonacci numbers

Research Article

Amara Chandoul

Abstract: In this paper, we obtain a generalization of [6,8]. Firstly, we consider the so-calledr−circulant ma-trices with generalized Fibonacci numbers and then found lower and upper bounds for the Euclidean and spectral norms of these matrices. Afterwards, we present some bounds for the spectral norms of Hadamard and Kronecker product of these matrices.

2010 MSC:15B05, 15A60, 65F35

Keywords: Matrix norm,r-circulant matrices, Generalized Fibonacci numbers

1.

Introduction

The Fibonacci numbers are the elements of integer sequence{Fn}∞n=0defined by the linear recurrence

equation

 

F0= 0, F1= 1

Fn+2=Fn+1+Fn, forn= 0,1,2, .... The sequence is s given by

0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13, . . . .

You cannot go very far in the lore of Fibonacci numbers without encountering the companion sequence of Lucas numbers{Ln}∞n=0,which follows the same recursive pattern as the Fibonacci numbers, but begins

with other initial values. It is defined by the linear recurrence equation

 

L0= 2, L1= 1

Ln+2=Ln+1+Ln, forn= 0,1,2, ....

(2)

The sequence is s given by

2,1,3,4,7,11,18,29, . . . .

The Fibonacci sequence has been studied extensively and generalized in many ways. Such generalizations are possible in four directions, namely, by changing the initial values, by mixing two Lucas sequences, by not demanding that the numbers in the sequences be integers, or by having more than two parameters.

One of generalization of Fibonacci i sequence is the integer sequence {Gn}∞n=0. It has the same

recurrence relation as Fibonacci and Lucas, namely it is defined by the linear recurrence equation

 

G0=a, G1=b

Gn+2=Gn+1+Gn, forn= 0,1,2, ....

The starting values of G0 =aand G1 =b can be specified. It therefore includes both sequences them

both as special cases.

This generalized Fibonacci sequence is giving by

a, b,(a+b),(a+ 2b),(2a+ 3b),(3a+ 5b),(5a+ 8b),(8a+ 13b), ...

{Gn}∞n=0is a generalization of{Fn}∞n=0and{Ln}∞n=0.Furthermore, there is a relationship such that

Gn=aFn−1+bFn, a, b∈Rbetween Fibonacci and generalized Fibonacci numbers.

Fibonacci, Lucas numbers and their generalization have many intersting properties and applications to almost every field of science and art. For the beauty and rich applications of these numbers and their relatives one may see Vajda’s and Koshy’s books [7,12].

Solak [10] defined the circulant matrices with Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, and he obtained lower and upper bounds with the Fibonacci number for the Euclidean and spectral norms of these matrices.

Civciv and Türkmen [2] constructed the circulant matrix with the Lucas number and then presented lower and upper bounds for the Euclidean and spectral norms of this matrix as a function ofn andLn which isnth Lucas number. In [2], they are studied the norm bounds for the Hadamard inverse of this matrix. In [1], authors computed some norms of r-circulant matrices associated with a number sequence.

In this study, we first construct the so-called r-circulant matrix with the generalized Fibonacci numbers and then present some lower and upper bounds for the Euclidean and spectral norms of this matrix.

We begin with some preliminaries related to our study. A matrix C = [cij] ∈ Mn(C)is called a

r-circulant matrix if it is of the form

cij =

cj−i j≥i

rcn+j−i j < i.

Obviously, the r-circulant matrix C is determined by parameter r and its first row elements

c0, c1,· · ·, cn−1. Especially, for r = 1, the matrix C is called a circulant matrix. For any A = [aij] ∈

Mm,n(C), the well known Frobenius (or Euclidean) norm of matrixAis

kAkE= v u u t

n X

i=1

n X

j=1

|aij|2.

The spectral norm of the matrix A

kAk2=

r

max

(3)

where λi is an eigenvalue ofAHAandAH is conjugate transpose of the matrixA. It is well known that

1

nkAkE ≤ kAk2≤ kAkE.

Ifk.kis any norm onm×ncomplex matrices, then [5]

kA◦Bk ≤ kAkkBk, (1) whereA◦B is the Hadamard product ofAandB.Define the maximum column lenght normc1(A)and

the maximum row lenght norm r1(A)of any matrix A respectively by

c1(A) = max 1≤j≤n

v u u t

n X

i=1

|aij|2

and

r1(A) = max 1≤i≤n

v u u t

n X

j=1

|aij|2.

LetA, B andC bem×ncomplex matrices. ifA=B◦C,then [4]

kAk2≤r1(B)c1(C). (2)

2.

Results

Definition 2.1. Ther−circulant matrixAwith generalized Fibonacci number is the matrix of the form

A=

      

G0 G1 . . . Gn−1

rGn−1 G0 . . . Gn−2

rGn−2 rGn−1 . .. . . . Gn−3

..

. ... . .. G0 ...

rG1 rG2 . . . rGn−1 G0

      

. (3)

Theorem 2.2. LetA be the matrix defined in (3). Then (i) If |r| ≥1,then

kAkE≥ q

n(Gn−1Gn−G1G0+G20), kAk2≥

q

Gn−1Gn−G1G0+G20

and

kAk2≤min

     

    

p

((n−1)|r|2+ 1)(G

n−1Gn−G1G0+G20),

p

((n−1)|r|2+G2

0)(Gn−1Gn−G1G0+ 1),

p

(Gn−1Gn−G1G0+G02)(Gn−1Gn−G1G0+ 1).

Moreover, if G0= 0, then

p

(4)

(ii) If |r|<1,then

kAkE ≥ |r| q

n(Gn−1Gn−G1G0+G20), kAk2≥ |r|

q

Gn−1Gn−G1G0+G20

and

kAk2≤min

     

    

p

n(Gn−1Gn−G1G0+G20),

p

((n−1) +G2

0)(Gn−1Gn−G1G0+ 1),

p

((n−1) +G2

0)(Gn−1Gn−G1G0+G20).

Moreover, if G0= 0, then

|r|pGnGn−1≤ kAk2≤

p

(n−1)Gn−1Gn.

Proof. From(3), we have

kAkE= v u u t

n−1

X

k=0

(n−k)G2k+

n−1

X

k=1

k|r|2G2

k,

Let matrices be defined as

B1= (b1,ij) =

b1,ij=r, i > j

b1,ij= 1, i≤j

B2= (b2,ij) =

b2,ij=G(mod(j−i,n)), i≥j

b2,ij= 1, i < j

B3= (b3,ij) =  

b3,ij=r, i > j

b3,ij=G0, i=j

b3,ij= 1, i < j

C1= (c1,ij) = (G(mod(j−i,n))).

C2= (c2,ij) =  

c2,ij=r, i > j

c2,ij= 1, i=j

c2,ij=G(mod(j−i,n)), i < j

and

C3= (c3,ij) =

c3,ij =G(mod(j−i,n)), i6=j

c3,ij = 1, i=j such thatA=Bk◦Ck, 1≤k≤3.Then we have

r1(B1) = max 1≤i≤n

v u u t

n X

j=1

|b1,ij|2=  

 p

(n−1)|r|2+ 1, |r| ≥1

n, |r|<1.

r1(B2) = max 1≤i≤n

v u u t

n X

j=1

|b2,ij|2= q

Gn−1Gn−G1G0+G20.

r1(B3) = max 1≤i≤n

v u u t

n X

j=1

|b3,ij|2=  

 p

G2

0+ (n−1)|r|2, |r| ≥1

p

G2

0+ (n−1), |r|<1.

(5)

c1(C1) = max 1≤j≤n

v u u t

n X

i=1

|c1,ij|2= q

Gn−1Gn−G1G0+G20.

c1(C2) = max 1≤j≤n

v u u t

n X

i=1

|c2,ij|2= p

Gn−1Gn−G1G0+ 1.

c1(C3) = max 1≤j≤n

v u u t

n X

i=1

|c3,ij|2= p

Gn−1Gn−G1G0+ 1.

(5)

IfG0= 0,we consider the matrices

B4= (b4,ij) =

b4,ij=rG(mod(j−i,n)), i≥j

b4,ij= 1, i < j.

C4= (c4,ij) =

c4,ij=G(mod(j−i,n)), i≤j

c4,ij= 1, i > j. Then, we have

r1(B4) = max 1≤i≤n

v u u t

n X

j=1

|b4,ij|2=|r| p

Gn−1Gn,

c1(C4) = max 1≤j≤n

v u u t

n X

i=1

|c4,ij|2= p

Gn−1Gn.

(6)

(i) If|r| ≥1, then we have

kAkE ≥ q

n(Gn−1Gn−G1G0+G20)

Thus, we obtain from √1

nkAkE ≤ kAk2,

kAk2≥

q

Gn−1Gn−G1G0+G20

On the other hand, using (4), (5) and (2), we have

kAk2≤min{r1(B1)c1(C1), r1(B2)c1(C2), r1(B3)c1(C3)}.

Thus, we have

kAk2≤min

     

    

p

((n−1)|r|2+ 1)(G

n−1Gn−G1G0+G20),

p

((n−1)|r|2+G2

0)(Gn−1Gn−G1G0+ 1),

p

(Gn−1Gn−G1G0+G02)(Gn−1Gn−G1G0+ 1).

Moreover, ifG0= 0,using (6), then

p

GnGn−1≤ kAk2≤ |r|Gn−1Gn. (ii) If|r|<1,then we have

kAkE≥ q

n|r|2(G

(6)

Thus, we have from √1

nkAkE ≤ kAk2,

kAk2≥ |r|

q

(Gn−1Gn−G1G0+G20).

On the other hand, using (4), (5) and (2), we have

kAk2≤min{r1(B1)c1(C1), r1(B2)c1(C2), r1(B3)c1(C3)}.

Thus, we have

kAk2≤min

     

    

p

n(Gn−1Gn−G1G0+G20),

p

((n−1) +G2

0)(Gn−1Gn−G1G0+ 1),

p

((n−1) +G2

0)(Gn−1Gn−G1G0+G20).

Moreover, ifG0= 0,then

|r|pGnGn−1≤ kAk2≤

p

(n−1)Gn−1Gn.

Corollary 2.3. Let G0=a= 0 andG1=b= 1 be in the theorem. Then

(i) If |r| ≥1,then pFnFn−1≤ kAk2≤ |r|FnFn−1.

(ii) If |r|<1,then|r|p

FnFn−1≤ kAk2≤

p

(n−1)FnFn−1.

Corollary 2.4. Let G0=a= 2 andG1=b= 1 be in the theorem. Then

(i) If |r| ≥1,then

p

LnLn−1+ 2≤ kAk2≤min

     

    

p

((n−1)|r|2+ 1)(L

nLn−1+ 2),

p

((n−1)|r|2+ 4)(L

nLn−1−1),

p

(LnLn−1+ 2)(LnLn−1−1).

(ii) If |r|<1,then

|r|pLnLn−1+ 2≤ kAk2≤

p

(n+ 3)(LnLn−1−1)

Theorem 2.5. LetA be the matrix defined in (3). Then (i) If |r| ≥1,then

kAk2≥

   

  

q

a2(1 +F

n−2Fn−1) + 2abFn2−1+b2FnFn−1, n odd

q

a2(1 +F

n−2Fn−1) + 2ab(Fn2−1−1) +b2FnFn−1, n even

(ii) If |r|<1,then

kAk2≥

   

  

|r|qa2(1 +F

n−2Fn−1) + 2abFn2−1+b2FnFn−1, n odd

|r|qa2(1 +F

(7)

Proof. We have,

n−1

X

k=0

G2k =Gn−1Gn−G1G0+G20

=

n−1

X

k=0

(aFk−1+bFk)2=a2 n−1

X

k=0

Fk21+ 2ab

n−1

X

k=0

Fk−1Fk+b2 n−1

X

k=0

Fk2.

As

n−1

X

k=0

Fk21=Fn−1Fn−2+ 1,

n−1

X

k=0

Fk2=FnFn−1

and

n−1

X

k=0

Fk−1Fk =  

F2

n−1, n odd

Fn2−1−1, n even

The proof of Theorem2.5become trivial.

Theorem 2.6. LetA be the matrix defined in (3). Then (i) If |r| ≥1,then

kAk2≤

                                                                           min                                q

a2(1 +F

n−2Fn−1) + 2abFn2−1+b2FnFn−1.

p

(n−1)|r|2+ 1,

q

a2F

n−2Fn−1+ 2abFn2−1+b2FnFn−1+ 1.

p

(n−1)|r|2+a2,

q

a2(1 +F

n−2Fn−1) + 2abFn2−1+b2FnFn−1.

q

a2F

n−2Fn−1+ 2abFn2−1+b2FnFn−1+ 1.

n odd min                                q

a2(1 +F

n−2Fn−1) + 2ab(Fn2−1−1) +b2FnFn−1.

p

(n−1)|r|2+ 1,

q

a2F

n−2Fn−1+ 2ab(Fn2−1−1) +b2FnFn−1+ 1.

p

(n−1)|r|2+a2,

q

a2(1 +F

n−2Fn−1) + 2ab(Fn2−1−1) +b2FnFn−1.

q

a2F

n−2Fn−1+ 2ab(Fn2−1−1) +b2FnFn−1+ 1.

(8)

(ii) If |r|<1,then

kAk2≤

                                                               min                          q

n(a2(1 +F

n−2Fn−1) + 2abFn2−1+b2FnFn−1),

q

a2F

n−2Fn−1+ 2abFn2−1+b2FnFn−1+ 1.

p

(n−1) +a2,

q

a2(1 +F

n−2Fn−1) + 2abFn2−1+b2FnFn−1.

p

(n−1) +a2,

n odd min                          q

n(a2(1 +F

n−2Fn−1) + 2ab(Fn2−1−1) +b2FnFn−1),

q

a2F

n−2Fn−1+ 2ab(Fn2−1−1) +b2FnFn−1+ 1.

p

(n−1) +a2,

q

a2(1 +F

n−2Fn−1) + 2ab(Fn2−1−1) +b2FnFn−1.

p

(n−1) +a2.

n even

Proof. As

n−1

X

k=1

Fk21=Fn−1Fn−2,

n−1

X

k=1

Fk2=FnFn−1

and

n−1

X

k=1

Fk−1Fk =  

F2

n−1, n odd

F2

n−1−1, n even

The proof of Theorem2.6become trivial.

Corollary 2.7. Let G0=a= 2andG1=b= 1be in the theorem. As FnFn−1≥n−1, ∀n≥0 and as

we have FnFn−1=Fn2−1+Fn−2Fn−1, then, we obtain

(i) If |r| ≥1,then  

 p

5FnFn−1+ 4≤ kAk2≤

p

((n−1)|r|2+ 4)(5F

nFn−1+ 1), n odd

p

5FnFn−1≤ kAk2≤

p

((n−1)|r|2+ 4)(5F

nFn−1−3), n even

(ii) If |r|<1,then  

|r|p

5FnFn−1+ 4≤ kAk2≤

p

n(5FnFn−1+ 4), n odd

|r|p

5FnFn−1≤ kAk2≤

p

n(5FnFn−1), n even

(9)

References

[1] D. Bozkurt, T. Y. Tam, Determinants and inverses ofr−circulant matrices associated with a number sequences, Linear and Multilinear Algebra 63(10) (2015) 2079–2088.

[2] H. Civciv, R. Turkmen, Notes on norms of circulant matrices with Lucas numbers, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Sci. 4(1) (2008) 142–147.

[3] C. He, J. Ma, K. Zhang, Z. Wang, The upper bound estimation on the spectral norm ofr−circulant matrices with the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, J. Inequal. Appl. Article ID 72 (2015) 1–10. [4] R. A. Horn, C. R. Johnson, Topics in Matrix Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,

1991.

[5] R. Mathias, The spectral norm of nonnegative matrix, Linear Algebra Appl. 139 (1990), 269–284. [6] A. Nalli, M. Sen, On the norms of circulant matrices with generalized Fibonacci numbers, Selçuk J.

Appl. Math. 11(1) (2010) 107–116.

[7] T. Koshy, Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers with Application, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2001. [8] S. Shen, J. Cen, On the norms ofr−circulant matrices with Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, Appl.

Math. Comput. 216(10) (2010) 2891–2897.

[9] S. Solak, On the norms of circulant matrices with Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, Appl. Math. Comput. 160(1) (2005) 125–132.

[10] S. Solak, Erratum to "On the norms of circulant matrices with Fibonacci and Lucas numbers" [Appl. Math. Comput. 160(1) (2005) 125–132], Appl. Math. Comput. 190(2) (2007) 1855–1856.

[11] N. Tuglu, C. Kizilates, On the norms of circulant andr−circulant matrices with the hyperharmonic Fibonacci numbers, J. Inequal. Appl. Article ID 253 (2015) 1–11.

References

Related documents

The team at the Network Dynamics and Simulation Science Laboratory (NDSSL) at Virginia Bioinformatics Institute (VBI) at Virginia Tech has developed a methodology to

To investigate this issue systematically, we considered one of the best established gene signatures, the 70-gene signature for breast cancer [2], and we compared the performance of

&amp; technologies, MNP support, user can configure all data interfaces, rules, reconciliations and reports, user defined data retention periods, centralized system setup, Risk

We assessed training effects on (a) tasks involving non-trained aspects of attention control: visual sustained attention, habituation speed, visual recognition memory,

Srikanta Patnaik, Mihir Narayan Mohanty “Optimization of Z-Shape Microstrip Antenna with I- slot Using Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization (DPSO) Algorithm” 2

Tool rotation speed was the major factor contributing to tensile strength and the axial force is found to be the important influential process parameter with

Hence, an attempt was made to synthesize curcumin encapsulated chitosan nanocapsules in the presence of gold nanoparticles for controlled and sustained drug release

Antioxidant activity of these extracts were performed by using DPPH free radical scavenging assay, total anti-oxidant capacity and the total phenol capacity where ascorbic acid