• No results found

\((\lambda,\mu)\)-fuzzy interior ideals of ordered \(\Gamma\)-semigroups

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "\((\lambda,\mu)\)-fuzzy interior ideals of ordered \(\Gamma\)-semigroups"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

© Journal “Algebra and Discrete Mathematics”

(λ, µ)

-fuzzy interior ideals

of ordered

Γ

-semigroups

Yuming Feng and P. Corsini

Communicated by V. Mazorchuk

A b s t r ac t . For allλ, µ∈[0,1] such thatλ < µ, we first intro-duced the definitions of (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideals and (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideals of an ordered Γ-semigroup. Then we proved that in regular and in intra-regular ordered semigroups the (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideals and the (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideals coincide. Lastly, we introduced the concept of a (λ, µ)-fuzzy simple ordered Γ-semigroup and charac-terized the simple ordered Γ-semigroups in terms of (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideals.

1. Introduction and preliminaries

The formal study of semigroups began in the early 20th century. Semi-groups are important in many areas of mathematics, for example, coding and language theory, automata theory, combinatorics and mathematical analysis.

Γ-semigroups were first defined by Sen and Saha [14] as a generalization of semigroups and studied by many researchers, for example [1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 3, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18].

The concept of fuzzy sets was first introduced by Zadeh [24] in 1965 and then the fuzzy sets have been used in the reconsideration of classical mathematics. Recently, Yuan [23] introduced the concept of fuzzy subfield with thresholds. A fuzzy subfield with thresholdsλandµ is also called a (λ, µ)-fuzzy subfield. Yao continued to research (λ, µ)-fuzzy normal

(2)

subfields, (λ, µ)-fuzzy quotient subfields , (λ, µ)-fuzzy subrings and (λ, µ )-fuzzy ideals in [19, 20, 21, 22].

In this paper, we studied (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideals in ordered Γ-semigroups. This can be seen as an application of [22] and as a generalization of [7, 11, 13].

Let S={x, y, z, ...}and Γ ={α, β, γ, ...}be two non-empty sets.

An ordered Γ-semigroup SΓ = (S,Γ,≤) is a poset (S,≤) such that

there exists a mappingS×Γ×SS (images of (a, α, b) to be denoted by aαb), such that, for allx, y, zS,α, β, γ∈Γ, we have

(1) (xβy)γz=(yγz).

(2) xy⇒ (

xαzyαz zαxzαy.

Note that an ordered semigroup is a special ordered Γ-semigroup with Γ ={◦}, i.e., Γ is a set with one element.

Let (S,,≤) be an ordered semigroup. A nonempty subsetAof S is called a left (respectively, right) ideal of S if (1)SAA(respectively,

ASA); (2) aA,bS,babA.A is called an ideal of S if it is both a left and a right ideal of S .

If (S,Γ,≤) is an ordered Γ-semigroup, and A is a subset of S, we denote by (A] the subset ofS defined as follows:

(A] ={tS|tafor someaA}.

Given an ordered Γ-semigroup S, a fuzzy subset of S (or a fuzzy set in S) is an arbitrary mapping f : S → [0,1], where [0,1] is the usual closed interval of real numbers. For any t∈[0,1], ftis defined by ft={xS|f(x)≥t}.

For each subsetAofS, the characteristic functionfAis a fuzzy subset of S defined by

fA(x) = (

1, if xA

0, if x6∈A.

In the following, we will use S,SΓ or (S,Γ,≤) to denote an ordered

Γ-semigroup.

(3)

2. (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideals and (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideals

In this section, we first introduce the concepts of (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideals and (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideals of an ordered Γ-semigroup. Then we show that every (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideal.

Definition 1. A fuzzy subsetf of an ordered Γ-semigroup S is called a (λ, µ)-fuzzy right ideal of S if

(1)f(xαy)∨λf(x)∧µfor all x, yS,α∈Γ and (2) If xy, then f(x)∨λf(y)∧µ for allx, yS.

A fuzzy subset f ofS is called a (λ, µ)-fuzzy left ideal of S if (1)f(xαy)∨λf(y)∧µfor all x, yS,α∈Γ and

(2) If xy, then f(x)∨λf(y)∧µ for allx, yS.

A fuzzy subsetf ofS is called a (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal ofS if it is both a (λ, µ)-fuzzy right and a (λ, µ)-fuzzy left ideal of S.

Definition 2. If (S,Γ,≤) is an ordered Γ-semigroup, a nonempty subset

Aof S is called an interior ideal ofS if (1)SΓAΓSA and

(2)IfaA, bS and ba, thenbA.

Definition 3. If (S,Γ,≤) is an ordered Γ-semigroup, a fuzzy subsetf of

S is called a (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideal of S if the following assertions are satisfied:

(1)f(xβaγy)∨λf(a)∧µfor all x, a, yS,β, γ∈Γ and (2) If xy, then f(x)∨λf(y)∧µ.

Theorem 1. Let(S,Γ,≤) be an orderedΓ-semigroup, Thenf is a(λ, µ) -fuzzy interior ideal ofS if and only if ft is an interior ideal of S for all t∈(λ, µ].

Proof. Letf be a (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideal ofS,∀t∈(λ, µ] and∀β, γ∈Γ. First of all, we need to show that xβaγyft, for all aft,x, yS. From f(xβaγy)∨λf(a)∧µtµ= t and λ < t we conclude thatf(xβaγy)≥t, that is xβaγyft.

Then, we need to show thatbftfor allaft, bS such thatba. From ba we know that f(b)∨λf(a)∧µ and from aft we havef(a)≥t. Thus f(b)∨λtµ=t. Notice thatλ < t, we conclude thatf(b)≥t, that is bft.

Conversely, let ftbe an interior ideal of S for all t∈(λ, µ].

If there arex0, a0, y0 ∈S, such thatf(x0βa0γy0)∨λ < t=f(a0)∧µ,

(4)

x0βa0γy06∈ft. This is a contradiction with that ft is an interior ideal of S. Hence f(xβaγy)∨λf(a)∧µholds for all x, a, yS.

If there arex0, y0∈Ssuch thatx0≤y0 andf(x0)∨λ < t= f(y0)∧µ,

then t∈(λ, µ], f(y0)≥tand f(x0)< t, that is y0∈ft andx06∈ft. This

is a contradiction with thatft is an interior ideal of S. Hence ifxy, thenf(x)∨λf(y)∧µ.

Theorem 2. Let(S,Γ,≤)be an orderedΓ-semigroup andf a(λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal of S, then f is a(λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideal of S.

Proof. Let x, a, yS,β, γ ∈Γ, Sincef is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy left ideal of S

and x, aγyS, we have that

f((aγy))∨λf(aγy)∧µ (1)

Since f is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy right ideal of S, we have that

f(aγy)∨λf(a)∧µ (2)

From (1) and (2) we know thatf(xβaγy)∨λ= (f((aγy))∨λ)∨λ≥ (f(aγy)∧µ)∨λ= (f(aγy)∨λ)∧(µλ)≥f(a)∧µ.

3. (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideals of regular/intra-regular

or-dered Γ-semigroups

We prove here that in regular and in intra-regular ordered Γ-semigroups the (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideals and the (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideals coincide.

Definition 4. An ordered Γ-semigroup (S,Γ,≤) is called regular if for all aS there existsxS such thataaβxγa, for allβ, γ ∈Γ.

Definition 5. An ordered Γ-semigroup (S,Γ,≤) is called intra-regular if for all aS there exists x, yS such that axβaγaδy, for all

β, γ, δ ∈Γ.

Theorem 3. Let (S,Γ,≤) be a regular ordered Γ-semigroup and f a

(λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideal ofS, then f is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal of S.

Proof. Let x, yS, thenf(xβy)∨λf(x)∧µ, for all β ∈Γ.

Indeed, since S is regular and xS, there exist zS such that

xxβzγx, for all β, γ ∈ Γ. Thus we have that xβy ≤ (xβzγx)βy = (xβz)γxβy. So

(5)

forf is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideal. Again sincef is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideal ofS, we have

f((xβz)γxβy)∨λf(x)∧µ. (4)

From (3) and (4) we have that f(xβy) ∨ λ = (f(xβy) ∨ λ) ∨ λ ≥ (f((xβz)γxβy)∧µ)∨λ = (f((xβz)γxβy)∨λ)∧(µλ) ≥ f(x) ∧µ,

andf is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy right ideal of S.

In a similar way, we can prove that f is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy left ideal of S. Thusf is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal ofS.

Theorem 4. Let (S,Γ,≤) be an intra-regular ordered semigroup andf a

(λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideal of S, then f is a(λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal ofS.

Proof. Leta, bS, thenf(aβb)∨λf(a)∧µ, for all β ∈Γ.

Indeed, since S is intra-regular andaS, there exist x, yS such thataxβaγaδy. Then aβb≤(xβaγaδy)βb.

Sincef is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideal ofS, we have thatf(aβb)∨λ= (f(aβb)∨λ)∨λ≥(f(xβaγaδyβb)∧µ)∨λ= (f(xβaγaδyβb)∨λ)∧(µλ).

Again sincefis a (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideal ofS, we havef(xβaγaδyβb)∨

λ=f((xβa)γaδ(yβb))∨λf(a)∧µ.

Thus we have thatf(aβb)∨λf(a)∧µ, andf is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy right ideal ofS.

In a similar way we can prove that f is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy left ideal of S. Therefore, f is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal ofS.

Remark 1. From previous theorems we know that in regular or intra-regular ordered Γ-semigroups the concepts of (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideals and (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideals coincide.

4. (λ, µ)-fuzzy simple ordered Γ-semigroups

In this section, we introduce the concept of (λ, µ)-fuzzy simple ordered Γ-semigroups and characterize this type of ordered Γ-semigroups in terms of (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideals.

Definition 6. An ordered Γ-semigroupS is called simple if it does not contain proper ideals, that is, for any idealA6=∅ of S, we haveA=S.

Definition 7. An ordered Γ-semigroup S is called (λ, µ)-fuzzy simple if for any (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal f of S, we havef(a)∨λf(b)∧µ, for all

(6)

Remark 2. In [11], Kehayopulu and Tsingelis studied (0,1)-fuzzy simple ordered semigroup (They called it fuzzy simple ordered semigroup. see Definition 3.1 of [11]).

Sardar, Davvaz and Majumder researched (0,1)-fuzzy simple ordered Γ-semigroup , which was called fuzzy simple ordered Γ-semigroup in their paper [13].

Theorem 5. Let S be an ordered Γ-semigroup, then S is (λ, µ)-fuzzy simple if and only if for any (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal f of S, if ft 6= ∅, then ft=S, for all t∈(λ, µ].

Proof. Assume that S is is (λ, µ)-fuzzy simple. For any (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal

f of S, suppose that ft6=∅. We need to prove thatxft for allxS, where t∈(λ, µ].

Sinceft6=∅, we can suppose that there exists yft, that isf(y)≥t. So f(x)∨λf(y)∧µtµ=t.

Notice that λ < t, we have thatf(x)≥t, that is xft.

Conversely, for any (λ, µ)-fuzzy idealf of S, suppose thatft=S, for all t∈(λ, µ]. We need to prove thatf(a)∨λf(b)∧µ, for all a, bS. If there exist a0, b0 ∈ S, such that f(a0)∨λ < t = f(b0)∧µ, then t ∈ (λ, µ], f(a0) < t and f(b0) ≥ t. Thus a0 6∈ ft = S. This is a contradiction.

So f(a)∨λf(b)∧µholds, for alla, bS.

Proposition 1. LetS be an ordered Γ-semigroup and f a (λ, µ)-fuzzy right ideal of S, then Ia={bS|f(b)∨λf(a)∧µ} is a right ideal of S for everyaS.

Proof. Let aS, then Ia6=∅ sinceaIa.

(1) Let bIa andsS, thenbβsIa for any β ∈Γ. Indeed, since f is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy right ideal of S and b, sS, we have

f(bβs)∨λf(b)∧µ. (5)

Since bIa, we have that

f(b)∨λf(a)∧µ. (6)

From (5) and (6) we conclude that f(bβs)∨λ= (f(bβs)∨λ)∨λ≥ (f(b)∧µ)∨λ= (f(b)∨λ)∧(µλ)≥f(a)∧µ.So bβsIa.

(2) Let bIa and Ssb, then sIa. Indeed, since f is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy right ideal of S ,s, bS and sb, we have

(7)

SincebIa, we have

f(b)∨λf(a)∧µ. (8)

From (7) and (8) we obtain that f(s)∨λ= (f(s)∨λ)∨λ≥(f(b)∧

µ)∨λ= (f(b)∨λ)∧(µλ)≥f(a)∧µ. So sIa.

Similarly, we have

Proposition 2. Let S be an ordered Γ-semigroup and f a(λ, µ)-fuzzy left ideal ofS, then Ia={bS|f(b)∨λf(a)∧µ} is a left ideal of S

for everyaS.

By the previous two propositions we have

Proposition 3. Let S be an ordered Γ-semigroup and f a(λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal of S, then Ia = {bS|f(b)∨λf(a)∧µ} is an ideal of S for

every aS.

Lemma 1. Let S be an ordered Γ-semigroup and∅ 6=IS, then I is an ideal of S if and only if the characteristic function fI is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy

ideal of S.

Proof. “⇒”

SupposeI is an ideal of S. For anyxS, two cases are possible: (1) xI. In this case, xγyI for any γ ∈ Γ and yS. This is becauseI is an ideal of S.

ThusfI(xγy) =fI(x) = 1 and so fI(xγy)∨λfI(x)∧µ. Similarly, we have fI(yγx)∨λfI(x)∧µ.

So fI is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal of S.

(2) x 6∈ I. In this case, fI(x) = 0. So fI(xγy)∨λfI(x)∧µ and fI(yγx)∨λfI(x)∧µhold. ThusfI is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal of S.

“⇐”

Conversely, suppose thatfI is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal ofS. ThenfI(xγy)∨ λfI(x)∧µ andfI(yγx)∨λfI(x)∧µ.

Set xI, we need to show thatxγyI andyγxI for any γ ∈Γ andyS.

SincexI, we have thatfI(x) = 1, sofI(xγy)∨λµandfI(yγx)∨ λµ. Note that λ < µ, we have that fI(xγy) ≥ µ and fI(yγx) ≥ µ. Thus fI(xγy) = 1 and fI(yγx) = 1. That isxγyI andyγxI for any γ∈Γ andyS.

Theorem 6. An ordered Γ-semigroup S is simple if and only if it is

(8)

Proof. SupposeS is simple, letf be a (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal ofS anda, bS. By previous propostion, the set Ia is an ideal ofS. SinceS is simple, we haveIa=S. ThenbIa, from which we have that f(b)∨λf(a)∧µ. Thus S is (λ, µ)-fuzzy simple.

Conversely, suppose S contains proper ideals and let I be such ideal of S. By the previous lemma, we know that fI is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal of S. We have that SI. Indeed, let xS. Since S is (λ, µ)-fuzzy simple, fI(x)∨λfI(b)∧µfor all bS. Now letaI. Then we have fI(x)∨λfI(a)∧µ= 1∧µ=µ. Notice thatλ < µ, we conclude that fI(x)≥µ, which implies thatfI(x) = 1, that isxI. Thus we have that SI, and so S =I. We get a contradiction.

Lemma 2. An ordered Γ-semigroupS is simple if and only if for every

aS, we haveS = (SΓaΓS].

Proof. It is easy from Lemma 1.2 of [10] or from Theorem 1.1 of [4].

Theorem 7. LetSbe an orderedΓ-semigroup, thenS is simple if and only if for every (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior idealf ofS, we havef(a)∨λf(b)∧µ, for all a, bS.

Proof. SupposeSis simple. Letf be a (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideal ofS and

a, bS. SinceS is simple andbS, by the previous lemma, we have that

S = (SΓbΓS]. SinceaS, we have that a∈(SΓbΓS]. Then there exist

x, ySandβ, γ∈Γ such thataxβbγy. Sincea, xβbγyS, axβbγy

and f is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideal ofS, we have that

f(a)∨λf(xβbγy)∧µ. (9)

Since x, b, yS and f is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideal ofS, we have that

f(xβbγy)∨λf(b)∧µ. (10)

From (9) and (10) we conclude thatf(a)∨λ= (f(a)∨λ)∨λ≥(f(xβbγy)∧

µ)∨λ= (f(xβbγy)∨λ)∧(µλ)≥f(b)∧µ.

Conversely, Suppose that for every (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior idealf of S, we have f(a)∨λf(b)∧µ, for alla, bS.

Now let f be any (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal f of S, then it is a (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideal of S. So we have f(a)∨λf(b)∧µ, for alla, bS. Thus

S is (λ, µ)-fuzzy simple by its definition. And from the previous theorem, we conclude that S is simple.

(9)

Theorem 8. For an ordered Γ-semigroupS, the following are equivalent: (1) S is simple.

(2) S= (SΓaΓS]for every aS. (3) S is (λ, µ)-fuzzy simple.

(4) For every(λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideal f of S, we have f(a)∨λ

f(b)∧µ, for all a, bS.

5. Conclusion and further research

In this paper, we generalized results of [11, 13]. We introduced (λ, µ )-fuzzy ideals and (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideals of an ordered Γ-semigroup and studied them. Whenλ= 0 and µ= 1, we meet ordinary fuzzy ideals and fuzzy interior ideals. So we can say that (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideals and (λ, µ)-fuzzy interior ideals are more general concepts than fuzzy ones.

In [22], Yao gave the definition of (λ, µ)-fuzzy bi-ideals in semigroups. One can study (λ, µ)-fuzzy bi-ideals in ordered Γ-semigroups. We would like to explore this in next papers.

Acknowledgment

This paper is finished during the first author’s visiting in Universita’ degli Studi di Udine. The first author wishes to give his hearted thanks to Mr. Zuddas, Mr. Sciarretta, Mr. Gessel and Mr. Li Lei for the kind help during his stay in Udine.

References

[1] S. Chattopadyay,Right inverseΓ-semigroup, Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc., 78, 1986, pp.180-186.

[2] S. Chattopadyay,Right OrthodoxΓ-semigroup, Southeast Asian Bull. Math., 29, 2005, pp.23-30.

[3] R. Chinram,On quasi-Γ-ideals inΓ-semigroups, ScienceAsia, 32, 2006, pp.351-353. [4] R. Chinram, K. Tinpun,A note on minimal bi-ideals in orderedΓ-semigroups,

International Mathematical Forum, 4(1), 2009, pp.1-5.

[5] T.K. Dutta, N.C. Adhikari,OnΓ-semigroup with right and left unities, Soochow J. Math., 19(4), 1993, pp.461-474.

[6] T.K. Dutta, N.C. Adhikari,On prime radical of Γ-semigroup, Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc., 86(5), 1994, pp.437-444.

[7] Y. Feng, P. Corsini, (λ, µ)-fuzzy version of ideals, interior ideals, quail-ideals and bi-ideals, Journal of Applied Mathematics, Volume 2012, Article ID 425890, 7 pages, doi:10.1155/2012/425890.

(10)

[9] K. Hila,On some classes of le-Γ-semigroup and minimal quasi-ideals, Algebras Groups Geom., 24, 2007, pp.485-495.

[10] A. Iampan, M. Siripitukdet, On minimal and maximal ordered left ideals in po-Γ-semigroups, Thai Journal of Mathematics, 2(2), 2004, pp.275-282.

[11] N. Kehayopulu, M. Tsingelis, Fuzzy interior ideals in ordered semigroups, Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics, Vol.21, 2006, pp.65-71.

[12] N.K. Saha,On Γ-semigroup II, Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc., 79, 1987, pp.331-335. [13] S. Sardar, B. Davvaz, S. Majumder,A study on fuzzy interior ideals of Γ -semigroups, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 60, 2010, pp.90-94. [14] M.K. Sen, N.K. Saha,OnΓ-semigroup I, Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc., 78, 1986,

pp.180-186.

[15] M.K. Sen, S. Chattopadhyay,Semidirect product of a monoid and aΓ-semigroup, East-West J. Math., 6, 2004, pp.131-138.

[16] M.K. Sen, A. Seth,On po-Γ-semigroups, Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc., 85, 1993, pp.445-450.

[17] M.K. Sen, N.K. Saha,OrthodoxΓ-semigroups, Internat. J. Math. Math. Soc., 13, 1990, pp.527-534.

[18] M. Uckun, M.A. Ozturk, Y.B. Jun,Intuitionistic fuzzy sets inΓ-semigroups, Bull. Korean Math. Soc., 44(2), 2007, pp.359-367.

[19] B. Yao, (λ, µ)-fuzzy normal subfields and (λ, µ)-fuzzy quotient subfields, The Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics, Vol.13, No.3, 2005, pp.695-705.

[20] B. Yao, (λ, µ)-fuzzy subrings and(λ, µ)-fuzzy ideals, The Journal of Fuzzy Mathe-matics, Vol.15, No.4, 2007, pp.981-987.

[21] B. Yao,Fuzzy Theory on Group and Ring, Beijing:Science and Technology Press (in Chinese), 2008.

[22] B. Yao, (λ, µ)-fuzzy ideal in semigroups, Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, Vol.23, No. 1, 2009, pp123-127.

[23] X. Yuan ,C. Zhang ,Y. Ren,Generalized fuzzy groups and many-valued implications, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 138, 2003, pp.205-211.

[24] L.A. ZadehFuzzy sets, Inform. Control, 8, 1965, pp.338-353. C o n tac t i n f o r m at i o n

Yuming Feng1,2, P. Corsini2

1

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Wanzhou, Chongqing, 404100, P.R. China

[email protected] 2

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Architet-tura dell’Universita’ degli Studi di Udine, Via delle Scienze, 206, 33100 Udine, Italy

References

Related documents

This is a composition PhD entitled Incantations after the principal work, a chamber concerto written for the Birmingham Contemporary Music Group. There are 11 supporting

The results showed that the overexpression of BBX cDNA in DPSCs/progenitors induced substantial mineralization and expression of the odontoblast marker genes, such as ALP, OPN,

Again, the Kruse (2011) nonlinear unit root tests are conducted using the raw, demeaned and detrended inflation differential data for CEMAC member states.. Table

/,From the standpoint of syntax-driven lexical semantics, the desiderata of analysis include preserving argument structure and producing a semantic analysis in such a

A Particle Filter algorithm for Bayesian Wordsegmentation Benjamin Bo?rschinger Department of Computing Macquarie University Sydney benjamin borschinger@mq edu au Mark Johnson Department

This study aims to examine the influence of leadership style and work environment on performance with work motivation and job satisfaction as an intervening variable at

It also suggests that Golgi-to- vacuole trafficking through either the AP-3 or the endosomal route is sufficient to support subapical vacuole expansion dur- ing polarized hyphal

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the activity of iNOS in peripheral blood leukocy− tes of patients with early arthritis (EA) and establi− shed rheumatoid arthritis (RA)