• No results found

Payment Modeling Workgroup Breakout Session March 17, 2015

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Payment Modeling Workgroup Breakout Session March 17, 2015"

Copied!
35
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Payment Modeling Workgroup Breakout Session

March 17, 2015

(2)

Agenda

Meeting Objectives

Introductions

Workgroup Purpose

Payment Modeling Transformation Sequence

Workflow Deliverables

Workflow Timeline

Next Steps

(3)

Meeting Objectives

Workgroup members get to know each other, members of the SHIP

team

Become familiar with workgroup specific transformation sequence,

initial set of deliverables, and related timelines.

o

Deeper, and workgroup specific, dive into content reviewed by Julie earlier

today

Review immediate next steps to begin work

(4)

Introductions

Introduce yourself and share your professional experience.

Why did you agree to participate in this workgroup?

Based on what you heard this morning, identify:

o

One opportunity we should capitalize on

o

One barrier we will need to address

(5)

Payment Modeling Workgroup – Purpose

The purpose of the Payment Modeling Workgroup is to develop

approaches to

payment, reimbursement, and investment

that will

support successful implementation of the

care delivery system

transformation and population health improvement

strategies

identified by those workgroups.

The Payment Modeling team will serve as a

resource to all SHIP

transformation teams,

including designating representatives from the

Payment Modeling team to serve as embedded members of the three

transformation teams.

(6)

Payment Modeling Transformation Sequence

Workflow Deliverables

Workflow Deliverable Timeline

Approach to Completing Workgroup Deliverables

(7)

Define What a

‘good’ Paymt

Model is/does

Inventory

Existing

Models

Note/Clarify

Redundancy

Sustainability

What needs/attributes describe a good payment model?

Transformation

Payment Needs

Assessment

Gap/Root

Cause

Analysis

Best Practice/

Implementation

Road Map

Payment Modeling Transformation Sequence

What payment models/experiments are currently active?

Build payment model inventory/menu.

Are there similar payment models being called different things?

Create unique and descriptive names for each basic model.

What are the attributes of the

payment models needed by the

transformation teams?

Identify gaps between current state and goals/identified

community best practice. What root causes underlie gaps?

How should current models be adapted? Redesigned?

What is the road map for designing and testing new payment/investment

models? What is the plan to disseminate and support implementation?

Examples of successful payment/investment models

applied to target pop, intervention? What

measurement, data issues do they raise?

Community

Best Practice

(8)

Step

Description

Purpose

What Is A “Good”

Payment Model?

Identify realistic, actionable and measurable goals for payment/investment that will advance the health and health care of this population. Consider

patient/person/population perspective at center.

To establish a set of common/core attributes that all stakeholders agree are appropriate, achievable, actionable and measurable. These attributes will serve to align the efforts of all stakeholders in the transformation of payment/investment for this population

Population Boundaries

Transformation Teams identify specific population of people/patients to be considered in this transformation

study

To clearly define the attributes of those included in the study so that team members can focus the transformation effort

Discovery

Structured gathering of relevant evidence-based

information about the population being studied – here, payment/investment models currently being applied to this population. Confirm interventions being identified by Transformation Teams.

To develop a well founded understanding of the current approaches to payment/investment for populations and interventions identified by

Transformation Teams. Determine what kind of inventory of current models, results, etc. would add value.

Community Best

Practice

Identification of actions by stakeholder group, specific to payment/investment, that will positively advance the Shared Goals for this group of people/patients

Go and see” examples of payment/investment in desired interventions. Can current approaches meet the need, work for WI? Why/why not? Consider connections with Transformation Measurement and HTI workgroups.

Gap Analysis/Root

Cause Assessment

Identify gaps between the current state and future state of the payment/investment models that pertain to the health and health care of this population. Identify and document root cause(s) associated with the gap(s). Multiple,

stakeholder based root causes are likely to track to one gap.

Define the gaps to permit assessment of whether proposed interventions will address gaps/root causes. Identify circumstances for each stakeholder group that adversely impact the identified gap(s)

(9)

Step

Description

Purpose

Wisconsin Best Practice

Identify approaches to payment/investment that meet identified attributes of successful model and build on current/known community best practice. Provide

frameworks, other support as needed by those who will implement.

To develop a menu of approaches to designing/implementing approaches to payment/investment that advance the health/healthcare needs of target population and engage all relevant stakeholders

Implementation Road

Map

Establish sequence of events, key actors, dependencies, needs for implementation support, etc.

To support successful, sustainable, scalable implementation of Wisconsin best practice approaches to payment/investment by wide array of necessary

stakeholders.

(10)

Population Boundaries

Sources of Potential Priority Areas

SIM FOA and Plan for Improving Population Health, including Metrics

Care Redesign, Behavioral Health, and Population Health Workgroups

(11)

Population Boundaries

Suggested Criteria for Choosing Sub-Populations

Big enough to matter

Small enough to manage – get reports, digest, understand the data and the improvement

opportunities

Data is available to understand the problem and the opportunity, and the data supports the

choice

Some degree of homogeneity within the sub-population

In the line of sight of stakeholders – they are already interested

Connect to clinical environment in some way

Pick to win – successful application of transformation model from top to bottom

Experienced "transformation leaders" and can apply and improve the model the first time

through

Not necessary to look first at biggest cost, highest variation

Private and public sector relevance

(12)

Population Boundaries

Early Thinking

Hypertension

Obesity

Tobacco

Diabetes

12

(13)

Population Boundaries

Why Hypertension?

Prevalent

Root cause/driver of poor health

Gaps in outcomes

Costly – to healthcare, to employers, to families and communities

Amenable both to clinical and also community interventions

Existing momentum nationally, in the state

DHS/CDC

Million Hearts

CHNA/CHIP Top 8 (Root Causes – Nutrition/PA/Obesity/Tobacco)

(14)

Population Boundaries

Many Questions to be Answered

Adults?

Working age – 18 – 64?

Seniors – 65+?

Kids?

Geographic focus area – urban, suburban, rural?

Focus by socioeconomic status or educational attainment?

Focus by racial or ethnic group?

Focus on greatest gaps, by any of these definitions of the population?

(15)

Community Conditions that Facilitate Healthy

Choices

Best Clinical Practice Including Patient Population

Health Management Strategies, Registries, Etc.

Patients’

Health Needs

and Goals

Care Redesign Workgroup Begins Here

Population Health Workgroup Begins Here

Payment Models, Measures, Data

(16)

Our goal will be to ground the SHIP Plan for Improving Population Health in

health care improvement

priorities

, while planning to act at the

intersection of health care and community,

as well as plan for

community level changes that are connected back

to the clinical transformation priorities.

P/S/E* Changes to

Support Healthier

Choices, Reduced

Risks

Clinic-Community

Linkages

Health Care

Transformation

Clinical improvement priority with clinical redesign recommendations including population medicine/clinical population health activities

Clinic- community linkage strategies, including other partners (collective impact

model)

Community P/S/E that supports optimal health, reduced risk factors, makes

aligned activities possible Community P/S/E that supports optimal health, reduced risk factors, makes

aligned activities possible Clinic- community linkage

strategies, including other partners (collective impact

model)

Community P/S/E that supports optimal health, reduced risk factors, makes

aligned activities possible

*P/S/E = Policy, Systems, and Environmental

(17)

What is a Good Payment Model?

Successful Payment Models Will…

Create incentives for healthcare providers and (as appropriate)

community partners to deliver optimal care to patients/consumers while

minimizing waste.

Support staff and infrastructure necessary to deliver identified best

practice

Require financial participation by all those with a stake in the outcome

Be risk adjusted and sized to the target – right payment for right

patients/consumers, right services

(18)

What is a Good Payment Model?

Successful Payment Models Will Be…

Supported by a demonstrated ROI – we are paying for what works, and

we can measure positive ROI on agreed-upon terms [may not all be

financial, in same time frame, savings may not accrue directly to the

payer/funder/investor]

Supported and viewed as feasible by majority of relevant public and

private payers/purchasers/funders – resulting in aligned approaches and

incentives

Developed and implemented in a context, with an understanding of how

this strategy contributes to the goal of better health with less disparity

(19)

What is a Good Payment Model?

What Do We Want to Finance?

(20)

What is a Good Payment Model?

Discussion

What attributes would you add to or subtract from the straw model?

Does the “healthcare 1.0/2.0/3.0” construct help to advance the

dialogue? Why or why not?

What Is A “Good”

Payment Model?

Identify realistic, actionable and measurable goals for payment/investment that will advance the health and health care of this population. Consider

patient/person/population perspective at center.

To establish a set of common/core attributes that all stakeholders agree are appropriate, achievable, actionable and measurable. These attributes will serve to align the efforts of all stakeholders in the transformation of payment/investment for this population

(21)

Discovery

Healthcare Payment - Current Conditions

Pluralistic insurance marketplace – commercial and Medicaid

Majority of $$ still paid on a FFS basis

Pay for value picking up steam, but not coordinated, not at

scale in the commercial market

Medicare moving (effectively?) into value based payment

What else do we need to know to understand the current

state?

(22)

Discovery

Investments in Health - Current Conditions

Health outcomes are heavily influenced by non-clinical factors,

particularly education and income

Investments in these determinants come not just from

healthcare payers, but also from federal, state, and local

government, business, philanthropy

(23)
(24)
(25)

Community Best Practice

Approaches to Consider

(26)

Community Best Practice

Approaches to Consider

(27)

Discovery

Discussion

How can we quickly arrive at a

clear and relevant

picture of the

current state?

o

What aspects of the current payment/investment environment do we need to

better understand?

o

What can we get started on now vs. waiting for the Transformation

Workgroups to refine their thinking?

Implementation will be among our biggest challenges – how can we

start thinking now re: how best to test feasibility, build engagement?

Discovery

Structured gathering of relevant evidence-based

information about the population being studied – here, payment/investment models currently being applied to this population. Confirm interventions being identified by Transformation Teams.

To develop a well founded understanding of the current approaches to payment/investment for populations and interventions identified by

Transformation Teams. Determine what kind of inventory of current models, results, etc. would add value.

(28)

Define What a

‘good’ Paymt

Model is/does

Inventory

Existing

Models

Note/Clarify

Redundancy

Sustainability

April 2015

Transformation

Payment Needs

Assessment

Gap/Root

Cause

Analysis

Best Practice/

Implementation

Road Map

SHIP Workflow Deliverable Timeline

May 2015

May 2015

June 2015

July 2015

August/September 2015

June 2015

Community

Best Practice

28

(29)

Engaging advisory panel members

Monthly workgroup meetings

Using Google Drive

Workgroup support

Next Steps

(30)

Workgroup will engage advisory panel members as needed to solicit

input on the development of identified deliverables. Examples might

include.

o

When evidence based research is not available and/or specific expertise is

needed.

o

To identify best practices.

o

To confirm current environment, attributes, and characteristics of population,

models, and infrastructure.

o

Obtain input on ideal state goals, objectives, and outcomes.

Recommend

coordinating

outreach to Advisory Panel members by

discussing/assigning at workgroup meetings

Based on these desired contributions,

who is missing

from the

Payment Modeling Advisory Panel?

Engaging Advisory Panel Members

(31)

Goal is to have one in-person and one teleconference meeting

each month.

In-person meetings will be approximately 4 hours.

Teleconference meetings will be approximately 2 hours.

Potential for off-meeting research to contribute to deliverables.

Project staff will begin contacting workgroup members immediately

following workgroup meetings to schedule monthly meetings for April.

Workgroup substitutes are not allowed.

Facilitators and project staff will follow-up with workgroup members that

cannot attend a meeting.

Consistent participation is required given the short-time frame to develop the

SHIP.

Monthly Workgroup Meetings

(32)

Facilitate workgroup member access to resources,

documentation, and deliverables.

Access from any internet connection

Provides efficient and consistent approach to maintenance of

project documentation.

Version control

Project staff will provide tutorial webinar and support to assist

workgroup members.

Using Google Drive

(33)

During the SHIP development process please direct questions,

comments, or issues appropriately.

Administrative/General Questions

Contact Lacey Jafolla or Craig Steele

Send emails to [email protected]

Workgroup Specific Questions

Contact Workgroup Facilitator, Sarah Orth, or Joelle Espinosa

Escalating Questions/Issues

Contact Workgroup Facilitator or Julie Bartels

Contact list included in meeting folder

Workgroup Support

(34)

Questions?

(35)

Thank You!

[email protected]

608-265-4603 (desk)

608-445-2260 (cell)

References

Related documents

Such observations suggest that phages in general not only target responsive candidate genes to influence, but create a host-pathogen interface that appears confined to

The Blu-ray Disc using blue-violet laser achieves over 2-hour digital high definition video recording on a 12cm diameter CD/DVD size phase change optical disc..

The main aim of the bigger study, coordinated by the Collaboration for Health Equity in Education and Research (CHEER), is to investigate the impact of

Unlike standard equilibrium state analysis, the model shows that the explicit introduction of uncertainties regarding emissions, abatement costs, and equilibrium states makes it

If you have not automatically received Internet & MMS settings, please Configure your phone for Internet and MMS Online at:

In this paper, we review the best practices for Payment Service Providers (PSPs) and Payment Processors to build reliable, highly secure transaction networks on an IP-based

The PCI PTS (PIN Transaction Security) standards address the security of devices used by customers to perform card present transactions, as well as the Hardware Security

Social network analysis methods were applied to investigate the static and dynamic properties of the resulting social networks of honey bees on a global, intermediate and local