• No results found

INDR 202 - Chapter 12

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "INDR 202 - Chapter 12"

Copied!
35
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

INDR  202

ENGINEERING  ECONOMICS

CHAPTER  12

REPLACEMENT  DECISIONS

SPRING  2015

(2)

REPLACEMENT  DECISIONS

(3)

REPLACEMENT  ANALYSIS

REPLACEMENT  DECISION

replacement  of  existing  obsolete/worn-­out  assets

DEFENDER

existing  equipment

CHALLENGER

best  available  replacement  equipment

CURRENT MARKET VALUE of defender

TRADE-­IN ALLOWANCE offered by vendor to reduce the price of new equipment

(4)

EXAMPLE  1:  SUNK  COSTS

$0       $10,000   $20,000        $25,000 SUNK  COSTS  $15,000

ORIGINAL  INVESTMENT $20,000

MARKET  VALUE

$10,000

LOST  INVESTMENT

$10,000

REPAIR COST

(5)

REPLACEMENT  ANALYSIS

CASH-­FLOW  APPROACH

proceeds  from  sale  of  the  defender as  down  payment toward  purchasing  the  challenger

(equal analysis period for all alternatives)

OPPORTUNITY-­COST  APPROACH

proceeds  from  sale  of  the  defender as  investment required  to  keep  the defender

(6)

EXAMPLE  1:  CASH-­FLOW  APPROACH

0 1 2 3

$8,000

$2,500

DEFENDER

0 1 2 3

$6,000

$5,500

CHALLENGER

$15,000

$10,000 sales proceeds  

(7)

EXAMPLE  1:  CASH-­FLOW  APPROACH

DEFENDER

𝐴𝐸# 12% = $2,500 𝐴|𝐹, 12%, 3 − $8,000 = −$7,259.10

CHALLENGER

𝐴𝐸4 12% = $5,500 𝐴|𝐹, 12%, 3 − $6,000 − $5,000 𝐴|𝑃, 12%, 3    

= −$6,451.79

(8)

EXAMPLE  1:  OPPORTUNITY-­COST  APPROACH

0 1 2 3

$8,000

$2,500

DEFENDER

0 1 2 3

$6,000

$5,500

CHALLENGER

$15,000

$10,000

(9)

EXAMPLE  1:  OPPORTUNITY-­COST  APPROACH

DEFENDER

𝐴𝐸# 12% = $2,500 𝐴|𝐹, 12%, 3 − $8,000 − $10,000 𝐴|𝑃, 12%, 3

= −$11,422.64

CHALLENGER

𝐴𝐸4 12% = $5,500 𝐴|𝐹, 12%, 3 − $6,000 − $15,000 𝐴|𝑃, 12%, 3  

= −$10,615.33

(10)

ECONOMIC  SERVICE  LIFE

ECONOMIC  SERVICE  LIFE

useful  life  of  a  defender  (or  a  challenger)  that  results  in  the   minimum  annual  equivalent  cost  (ownership  &  operating)

(11)

ECONOMIC  SERVICE  LIFE

CAPITAL  COST

𝐶𝑅 𝑖 = 𝐼 𝐴|𝑃, 𝑖, 𝑁 − 𝑆

?

𝐴|𝐹, 𝑖, 𝑁

= 𝐼 − 𝑆

?

𝐴|𝑃, 𝑖, 𝑁 + 𝑖𝑆

?

OPERATING  COSTS

𝑂𝐶 𝑖 = B 𝑂𝐶

C

𝑃|𝐹, 𝑖, 𝑛

?

CEF

𝐴|𝑃, 𝑖, 𝑁

TOTAL  COST

(12)

ECONOMIC  SERVICE  LIFE

Useful  Life

(13)

EXAMPLE  2:  ECONOMIC  SERVICE  LIFE

Initial cost: $18,000

Operating costs: $1,000 in year 1 & 15% annual increase

Salvage value: $10,000 in year 1 & 25% annual decrease

Maximum life: 7 years

(14)
(15)

EXAMPLE  2:  ECONOMIC  SERVICE  LIFE

𝑁 = 1

(16)

EXAMPLE  2:  ECONOMIC  SERVICE  LIFE

𝑁 = 2

𝐴𝐸𝐶H 15% = $18,000 + $1,000 𝑃|𝐴F, 15%, 15%, 2 𝐴|𝑃, 15%, 2

(17)

EXAMPLE  2:  ECONOMIC  SERVICE  LIFE

Minimum  Cost

Economic  Service  Life

𝑁 = 6

𝑁 𝐴𝐸𝐶? 15%

(18)

INDEFINITE  SERVICE  PERIOD

REPLACE  DEFENDER  NOW

Challenger cash flows occur for an infinite number of years starting now.

Challenger is replaced by an identical one if necessary.

REPLACE  DEFENDER  

𝒙

YEARS  LATER

Defender cash flows occur in the first 𝑥 years.

(19)

EXAMPLE  3:  INDEFINITE  SERVICE  PERIOD

REPLACE  DEFENDER  NOW

New machine cost: $10,000.

Operating cost: $2,200 in year 1 with 20% annual increase Salvage value: $6,000 in year 1 with 15% annual decrease

REPLACE  DEFENDER  

𝒙

YEARS  LATER

Repair cost to use broken machine for 5 years: $1,200.

Operating cost: $2,000 in year 1 with $1,500 annual increase Salvage value: $5,000 now with 25% annual decrease

(20)

EXAMPLE  3:  INDEFINITE  SERVICE  PERIOD

𝑁 = 1

:

𝐴𝐸𝐶

F

15% = $5,380

𝑁 = 2

:  

𝐴𝐸𝐶

H

15% = $5,203

𝑁 = 3

:  

𝐴𝐸𝐶

K

15% = $5,469

𝑁 = 4

:  

𝐴𝐸𝐶

L

15% = $5,844

𝑁 = 5

:  

𝐴𝐸𝐶

M

15% = $6,258

Remaining  Useful  (Economic)  Service  Life  of  Defender  

Minimum  Cost

(21)

EXAMPLE  3:  INDEFINITE  SERVICE  PERIOD

𝑁 = 1

:

𝐴𝐸𝐶

F

15% = $7,700

𝑁 = 2

:  

𝐴𝐸𝐶

H

15% = $6,184

𝑁 = 3

:  

𝐴𝐸𝐶

K

15% = $5,756

𝑁 = 4

:  

𝐴𝐸𝐶

L

15% = $5,625

𝑁 = 5

:  

𝐴𝐸𝐶

M

15% = $5,631

Economic  Service  Life  of  Challenger

Minimum  Cost

(22)

EXAMPLE  3:  INDEFINITE  SERVICE  PERIOD

CHALLENGER

𝑁

4

= 4

𝐴𝐸𝐶

4

15% = $5,625

DEFENDER

𝑁

#

= 2

𝐴𝐸𝐶

#

15% = $5,203

To replace  the  defender  now?

NO:  𝐴𝐸𝐶# 15% < 𝐴𝐸𝐶4 15% ,  keep  it  by  

(23)

EXAMPLE  3:  MARGINAL  ANALYSIS

Incremental cost of keeping defender one more year from the end of its economic service life:

Opportunity cost at the end of year 2: $2,813 Operating cost in year 3: $5,000

Salvage value at the end of year 3: $2,109

STEP 1. Equivalent cost of keeping the defender in year 3

$2,813 𝐹|𝑃, 15%, 1 + $5,000 − $2,109 = $6,126

STEP 2. 𝐴𝐸𝐶4 15% = $5,625 < $6,126

(24)

TAX  CONSIDERATIONS

Whenever possible, after-­tax cash flows should be used

in replacement analysis.

(25)

EXAMPLE  1:  TAX  CONSIDERATIONS

MARKET  VALUE  $10,000

TAX  CREDIT

$4,693 40% = $1,877

NET  PROCEEDS  FROM  DISPOSAL  $11,877

$0 $10,000       $14,693 $20,000 DEPRECIATION

$5,307

$4,693 BOOK  LOSS

MARKET  VALUE  $10,000

DEPRECIATION  COST  BASIS  $20,000

(26)

EXAMPLE  3:  TAX  CONSIDERATIONS

REPLACE  DEFENDER  NOW

New machine cost: $10,000.

Operating cost: $2,000 in year 1 with $1,000 annual increase Salvage value: $6,000 in year 1 with 15% annual decrease

REPLACE  DEFENDER  

𝒙

YEARS  LATER

Repair cost to use broken machine for 5 years: $1,200.

Operating cost: $2,000 in year 1 with $1,500 annual increase Salvage value: $5,000 now with $1,000 annual decrease

(27)

EXAMPLE  3:  TAX  CONSIDERATIONS

Year Current Market  Value After-­Tax  Salvage Value

0 $5,000 $5,000(60%)  =  $3,000 1 $4,000 $4,000(60%)  =  $2,400 2 $3,000 $3,000(60%)  =  $1,800

3 $2,000 $2,000(60%)  =  $1,200

4 $1,000 $1,000(60%)  = $600

5 $0 $0

6 $0 $0

(28)

EXAMPLE  3:  TAX  CONSIDERATIONS

DEFENDER

Year Overhaul Operating  Cost After-­Tax  Operating  Cost

0 $1,200 $1,200(60%) =  $720

(29)

DEFENDER

𝑁 = 1

𝑁 = 2

𝑁 = 3

𝑁 = 4

(30)

EXAMPLE  3:  TAX  CONSIDERATIONS

(31)
(32)

EXAMPLE  3:  TAX  CONSIDERATIONS

Annual  Equivalent  Cost

(33)
(34)

SUMMARY

In replacement analysis,

defender

is an existing asset &

challenger

is the best available replacement candidate.

Current market value

is the value to be used in economic

analysis of a defender.

Sunk costs

cannot be changed by future decisions, so are

not considered in replacement analysis.

Two basic approaches to replacement problems are:

§ cash-­flow approach, explicitly considering actual cash flow

consequences for replacement alternatives as they occur,

§ opportunity-­cost approach, viewing proceeds from the sale

(35)

SUMMARY

Economic service life

is the remaining useful life of a

defender or a challenger, that results in minimum annual

equivalent cost. Replacement analysis uses economic

service lives of defender & challenger.

The ultimate question in replacement analysis is NOT

whether

to replace the defender, but

when

to do so.

Whenever  possible,  all  replacement  decisions  should  be  

References

Related documents

Since cash flow from operating activities is substantially greater than the cash paid out for dividends, it appears that the company can maintain and possibly increase

education programmes (TEPs): EFL Teacher Education Evaluation. Roshd FLT Journal. Using Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development to propose and test an explanatory model

The heavy duties assumed by colleges in human resource development requires supports from all parties or the college’s stakeholders in order to manifest the Good University

• ERM Implementation Training: The program focuses on the international standard of risk management, ISO 31000, and will be designed to meet the unique needs of public sector

Using large sample ( ) critical values, the GS designs have an inflation in ; # type I error rate due the critical values not accounting for uncertainty of the variance

In particular, this thesis wants to trouble the sister relationship and its representations in Virginia’s writing and consider questions about how Virginia writes and

In this study, for the first time, it is analysed the welfare costs of the regulation in the water supply in England and Wales, by computing the deadweight loss of the

Los objetivos de este estudio comprendieron: estimar la distribución geográfica potencial de Podocnemis lewyana, establecer la importancia relativa de las variables climáticas en