R E S E A R C H
Open Access
ϕ
-Contraction in generalized probabilistic
metric spaces
Saud M Alsulami
1*, Binayak S Choudhury
2and Pradyut Das
2*Correspondence: alsulami@kau.edu.sa
1Department of Mathematics, King
Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 138381, Jeddah, 21323, Saudi Arabia Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Abstract
We use the gauge function introduced by Fang to gain a fixed point result in probabilistic G-metric spaces. Our work extends some existing results. Moreover, our result is supported with an example.
MSC: 47H10; 54H25
Keywords: generalized PM-space; Had˘zi´c typet-norm;
ϕ-function; Cauchy
sequence; fixed point1 Introduction
Probabilistic fixed point theory originated in the work of Sehgal and Bharucha-Reid [] where they introduced a contraction mapping principle in probabilistic metric spaces. After that this line of research has developed through the works of different authors over the years. A comprehensive description of this development is given in the book of Had˘zić and Pap []. Some more recent references are noted in [–].
Metric spaces are generalized in different ways creating spaces like fuzzy metric spaces, -metric spaces,etc.Generalized metric space is one of such spaces in which to every triple of points a nonnegative real number is attached. Such spaces were introduced by Mustafa and Sims []. Fixed point theory and related topics have been developed through a good number of works in recent times, some instances of which are in [–].
In the same vein probabilistic generalized metric spaces have been introduced by Zhou
et al.[] wherein they also proved certain primary fixed point results in these spaces. An interesting class of problems in probabilistic fixed point theory was addressed in re-cent times by use of gauge functions. These are control functions which have been used to extend the Sehgal contraction in probabilistic metric spaces. Some examples of these applications are in [, , , , , ]. One of such gauge functions was introduced by Fang []. Here we use the gauge function used by Fang [] to obtain a fixed point result in probabilistic G-metric spaces. Our result is supported with an example.
It is perceived that the study of fixed points for contractions defined by using control functions is an important category of problems in fixed point theory. One of the causes for this interest is the particularities involved in the proofs. With this motivation we work out the results in this paper.
2 Mathematical preliminaries
In this section we discuss certain definitions and lemmas which will be necessary for es-tablishing the results of the next section.
Definition .[] A mappingF:R→R+is called a distribution function if it is nonde-creasing and left continuous withinft∈RF(t) = andsupt∈RF(t) = , whereRis the set of
real numbers andR+denotes the set of all nonnegative real numbers.
Definition .[, ] A binary operation: [, ]→[, ] is called a continuoust-norm
if the following properties are satisfied: (i) is associative and commutative, (ii) (a, ) =afor alla∈[, ],
(iii) (a,b)≤(c,d)whenevera≤candb≤dfor alla,b,c,d∈[, ], (iv) is continuous.
Generic examples of continuoust-norm areM(a,b) =min{a,b},P(a,b) =ab,etc.
Definition .[] A Menger space is a triplet (X,F,), whereXis a nonempty set,Fis a function defined onX×Xto the set of distribution functions andis at-norm such that the following are satisfied:
(i) Fx,y() = for allx,y∈X,
(ii) Fx,y(s) = for alls> if and only ifx=y,
(iii) Fx,y(s) =Fy,x(s)for alls> ,x,y∈X,
(iv) Fx,y(u+v)≥(Fx,z(u),Fz,y(v))for allu,v≥andx,y,z∈X.
Definition .[] The -tuple (X,G,) is called a probabilistic G-metric space (shortly PGM-space) ifXis a nonempty set,is a continuoust-norm andF∗is a function from
X×(,∞) to the set of distribution functions satisfying the following conditions for each
x,y,z∈Xandt,s> :
(i) Fx∗,y,z(t) = if and only ifx=y=z, (ii) Fx∗,x,y(t)≥Fx∗,y,z(t)withy=z,
(iii) Fx∗,y,z(t) =Fp∗(x,y,z)(t), wherepis a permutation function, (iv) (Fx∗,a,a(t),Fa∗,y,z(s))≤Fx∗,y,z(t+s).
Example .[] Let (X,F∗,) be a probabilistic metric space. Define a functionF∗ :
X×X×X→R+by
Fx∗,y,z(t) =minFx,y(t),Fy,z(t),Fz,x(t)
for allx,y,z∈Xandt> .
Then (X,F∗,) is a probabilistic G-metric space.
For more examples of probabilistic G-metric space refer to [].
Definition .[] Let (X,F∗,) be a probabilistic G-metric space andxbe any point
inX. For any> andλwith <λ< , an (,λ)-neighborhood ofxis the set of all points
yinXfor whichFx∗,y,y() > –λandFy∗,x,x() > –λ. We write
Nx(,λ) =
This means thatNx(,λ) is the set of all pointsy∈Xfor which the probability of the distance fromxtoybeing less thanis greater than –λ.
Lemma .[] If≤andλ≤λ,then Nx(,λ)⊆Nx(,λ).
Theorem . [] Let (X,F∗,) be a probabilistic G-metric space. Then (X,F∗,)
is a Hausdorff space in the topology induced by the family {Nx(,λ)} of (,λ) -neigh-borhoods.
Definition .[] Let (X,F∗,) be a probabilistic G-metric space.
(i) A sequence{xn} ⊂Xis said to converge to a pointx∈Xif given> ,λ> we can
find a positive integerN,λsuch that for alln>N,λ,
Fx,xn,xn()≥ –λ.
(ii) A sequence{xn}is said to be a Cauchy sequence inXif given> ,λ> there
exists a positive integerN,λsuch that
Fxn,xm,xl()≥ –λ for allm,n,l>N,λ.
(iii) A probabilistic G-metric space(X,F∗,)is said to be complete if every Cauchy sequence is convergent inX.
Definition .[] At-normis said to be a Had˘zić type (shortly H-type)t-norm if the family{m}
m>of its iterates defined for eacht∈[, ] by
(t) =(t,t)
and, in general, for allm> ,m(t) =(t,m–(t)) is equi-continuous att= , that is, given
λ> there existsη(λ)∈(, ) such that
η(λ) <t≤ ⇒ (m)η(λ)≥ –λ for allm> .
Definition .[] Letwdenote the class of all functionsϕ:R+→R+satisfying the
following condition:
for eacht> , there existsr≥tsuch thatlimn→∞ϕn(r) = .
Lemma .[] Letϕ∈w,then for each t> there exists r≥t such thatϕ(r) <t.
3 Main results
Definition . Let (X,F∗,) be a PGM-space with a continuoust-normof H-type. A mappingf :X→Xis said to be a probabilisticϕ-contraction if there exists a function
ϕ∈wsuch that
Lemma . Let{xn}be a sequence in a Menger PGM-space(X,F∗,),whereis a Had˘zić
type t-norm.If there exists a functionϕ∈wsuch that
(i) ϕ(t) > for all t> ,
(ii) Fx∗n,xn+,xn+ϕ(t)≥Fx∗n–,xn,xn(t) for all n∈Nand t> (.)
for all t> ,n≥,then{xn}is a Cauchy sequence in X.
Proof The condition (i) implies thatϕn(t) > for allt> andn≥, and from the condition
(ii), by induction, we have
Fx∗n,xn+,xn+ϕn(t)≥Fx∗,x,x(t) for allt> ,n≥. (.) We now prove that
lim
n→∞F ∗
xn,xn+,xn+(t) = for allt> . (.) SinceFx∗,x,x(t)→ ast→ ∞, for any∈(, ), there existst> such thatFx∗,x,x(t) > –. Sinceϕ∈w, there existst≥tsuch thatlimn→∞ϕn(t) = . Thus, for allt> ,
there existsn≥ such thatϕn(t) <tfor alln≥n. Byt>ϕn(t),t≥t, (.) and the
monotonic property of distribution functions, we have
Fx∗n,xn+,xn+(t)≥Fx∗n,xn+,xn+ϕn(t)
≥Fx∗,x,x(t)≥Fx∗,x,x(t) > – for alln≥n.
Thus (.) holds.
Sinceϕ∈w, by Lemma ., for anyt> , there existsr≥tsuch thatϕ(r) <t. Letn≥
be given. Now we show by induction that, for anyk≥,
Fx∗n,x
n+k,xn+k(t)≥
kF∗
xn,xn+,xn+
t–ϕ(r). (.)
Fork= , from (.) we have
Fx∗n,xn+,xn+(t)≥Fx∗n,xn+,xn+t–ϕ(r),Fx∗n,xn+,xn+t–ϕ(r) =Fx∗n,xn+,xn+t–ϕ(r).
Thus (.) holds fork= . Assume that (.) holds for somek≥. Sinceis monotone, from (iv) in Definition ., and then by (.) and (.), it follows that
Fx∗n,x
n+k+,xn+k+(t) =F ∗
xn,xn+k+,xn+k+
t–ϕ(r) +ϕ(r)
≥Fx∗n,xn+,xn+t–ϕ(r),Fx∗n+,xn+k+,xn+k+ϕ(r)
≥Fx∗n,xn+,xn+t–ϕ(r),Fx∗n,xn+k,xn+k(r) (by (.))
≥Fx∗n,xn+,xn+t–ϕ(r),Fx∗n,x
n+k,xn+k(t)
(sincer≥t)
≥Fx∗n,xn+,xn+t–ϕ(r),kFx∗n,xn+,xn+t–ϕ(r) =k+Fx∗n,xn+,xn+t–ϕ(r),
Next we show that{xn}is a Cauchy sequence inX, that is,limm,n,l→∞Fx∗n,xm,xl(t) = for
allt> . Lett> and << . Since{n(t)}is equi-continuous att= andn() = ,
then there existsδ> such that
n(s) > – for alls∈( –δ, ] andn≥.
We first prove thatlimn,m→∞Fx∗n,xm,xm(t)∈( –δ, ] for alln≥n. Sincet–ϕ(r) > , from
(.) there isn≥ such thatFx∗n,xn+,xn+(t–ϕ(r)) > –δfor alln≥n. Hence and by (.) we conclude thatFx∗n,xn+k+,xn+k+(t) > –for allk≥. Thus we proved that
lim
n,m→∞F ∗
xn,xm,xm(t) = for allt> . (.a)
By (iv) witha=xmin Definition ., we have, for allt> ,
Fx∗n,xm,x l(t)≥
Fx∗n,xm,xm
t
,Fx∗m,xm,x l
t
=
Fx∗n,xm,xm
t
,Fx∗ l,xm,xm
t
.
From (.a), it follows that
lim
n,m→∞F
∗
xn,xm,xm
t
= for allt> ,
lim
l,m→∞F
∗
xl,xm,xm
t
= for allt> .
Thus, by using the continuity of, we have
lim
m,n,l→∞F ∗
xn,xm,xl(t)≥
lim
n,m→∞F ∗
xn,xm,xm
t
, lim
l,m→∞F ∗
xl,xm,xm
t
=(, ) = .
Therefore, we proved that
lim
m,n,l→∞F ∗
xn,xm,xl(t) = for allt> .
This shows that{xn}is a Cauchy sequence inX.
Corollary .[] Let{xn}be a sequence in a Menger PM-space(X,F,),whereis a
Had˘zić type t-norm.If there exists a functionϕ∈wsuch that
(i) ϕ(t) > for all t> ,
(ii) Fxn,xm
ϕ(t)≥Fxn–,xm–(t) (.)
for all t> ,n,m≥,then{xn}is a Cauchy sequence in X.
Proof DefineFx∗,y,z(t) =min{Fx,y(t),Fy,z(t),Fx,z(t)}for allx,y,z∈Xandt> . Then (X,F∗,)
is a probabilistic G-metric space.
SinceFx∗n,xn+,xn+(ϕ(t)) =min{Fxn,xn+(ϕ(t)),Fxn+,xn+(ϕ(t)),Fxn,xn+(ϕ(t))}, it follows Fx∗n,xn+,xn+ϕ(t)=Fxn,xn+
Similarly we have
Fx∗n–,xn,xn(t) =Fxn–,xn(t). (.)
By using (.), (.) and (.), we have, for allt> ,
Fx∗n,xn+,xn+ϕ(t)=Fxn,xn+
ϕ(t)≥Fxn–,xn(t) =Fx∗n–,xn,xn(t).
Hence we conclude that (.) holds. By Lemma ., we conclude that {xn}is a Cauchy
sequence in the sense of PGM-space (X,F∗,), that is, given > ,λ> there exists a positive integerN,λsuch that
Fx∗n,xm,xl()≥ –λ for allm,n,l>N,λ. (.)
By definition ofF∗and (.), we have, for allt> ,
minFxn,xm(t),Fxm,xl(t),Fxn,xl(t)
≥ –λ.
This shows that{xn}is a Cauchy sequence in the sense of PM-space (X,F,).
Lemma . Let(X,F∗,)be a PGM-space.If there exists a functionϕ∈wsuch that
Fx∗,y,yϕ(t)≥Fx∗,y,y(t) (.)
for all t> and x,y∈X,then x=y.
Proof SinceF∗is monotonic, it is obvious that from (.) it followsϕ(t) > for allt> . Therefore we haveϕn(t) > for allt> andn≥. By induction, we have from (.) that
Fx∗,y,yϕn(t)≥Fx∗,y,y(t) (.) for allt> andn≥.
To provex=y, it is required thatFx∗,y,y(t) = for allt> . Suppose, to the contrary, that there exists somet> such thatFx∗,y,y(t) < . Sincelimt→∞Fx∗,y,y(t) = , there existst>t
such that
Fx∗,y,y(t) >Fx∗,y,y(t) (.)
for allt≥t.
Sinceϕ∈w, there existst≥tsuch thatlimn→∞ϕn(t) = . Therefore, we can choose
large enoughn≥ such thatϕn(t) <t. By the monotone property ofF∗, using (.)
and (.), we have
Fx∗,y,y(t)≥Fx∗,y,y
ϕn(t
)
≥Fx∗,y,y(t) >Fx∗,y,y(t),
Theorem . Let(X,F∗,)be a PGM-space with a continuous t-normof H-type.If the mapping f is a probabilisticϕ-contraction,then f has a unique fixed point in X.
Proof Letx∈Xbe an arbitrary pointX and the sequence{xn}be defined as follows:
xn+=fnxfor alln≥. Sincef is a probabilisticϕ-contraction, by (.) for allt> we
have
Fx∗n,xn+,xn+ϕ(t)=Ffx∗n–,fxn,fxnϕ(t)
≥Fx∗n–,xn,xn(t).
By Lemma . we conclude that the sequence{xn}is a Cauchy sequence inX. SinceXis
complete, there existsx∈Xsuch thatlimn→∞xn=x, that is, for allt> ,
lim
n→∞F
∗
x,xn,xn(t) = . (.)
Now we prove thatxis a fixed point off. By (iv) witha=fxnin Definition ., we have
Ffx∗,x,x(t)≥Ffx∗,fxn,fxnϕ(t),Ffx∗n,x,xt–ϕ(t)=Ffx∗,fxn,fxnϕ(t),Fx∗n+,x,xt–ϕ(t). Hence, by (.), we get
Ffx∗,x,x(t)≥Fx∗,xn,xn(t),Fx∗n+,x,xt–ϕ(t). (.) Again by (iii) and (iv) witha=xn+in Definition .,
Fx∗n+,x,xt–ϕ(t)=Fx∗,x,xn+t–ϕ(t)≥
Fx∗,xn+,xn+
t–ϕ(t)
,Fx∗n+,x,xn+
t–ϕ(t)
.
Hence, by (iii) in Definition ., we have
Fx∗n+,x,xt–ϕ(t)≥
Fx∗,xn+,xn+
t–ϕ(t)
,Fx∗,xn+,xn+
t–ϕ(t)
.
Now from (.) we get
Ffx∗,x,x(t)≥
Fx∗,xn,xn(t),
Fx∗,xn+,xn+
t–ϕ(t)
,Fx∗,xn+,xn+
t–ϕ(t)
. (.)
Sincelimn→∞xn=limn→∞xn+=xandis continuous, takingn→ ∞in (.) we get,
for allt> ,
Ffx∗,x,x(t)≥,(, )=(, ) = . Hence
fx=x,
Next suppose thaty=xis another fixed point off. Then, for allt> , we have
Fx∗,y,yϕ(t)=Ffx∗,fy,fyϕ(t)
≥Fx∗,y,y(t),
which implies, by Lemma ., thatx=y. Therefore,f has a unique fixed point inX. This
completes the proof of the theorem.
Example . LetX= [,∞) and(a,b) =min{a,b}for alla,b∈X. Define a function
F∗:X×[,∞)→[,∞) by
Fx∗,y,z(t) = t
t+G(x,y,z)
for allx,y,z∈XandG(x,y,z) =|x–y|+|y–z|+|z–x|. Then (X,F∗,) is a probabilistic G-metric space (see []).
Letf :X→Xbe a mapping defined byfx=x
andϕ:R
+→R+be defined by
ϕ(t) =
⎧ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎩
t
if ≤t< ,
–t + if ≤t≤,
t– if <t<∞.
It is easy to verify thatϕ∈wandϕ(t)≥t for allt≥.
Now we show thatf satisfies (.). We have
Ffx∗,fy,fzϕ(t)= ϕ(t)
ϕ(t) + [|fx–fy|+|fy–fz|+|fz–fx|]
= ϕ(t)
ϕ(t) + [|x
–
y
|+|
y
–
z
|+|
z
–
x
|]
≥
t
t
+ [|
x
–
y
|+|
y
–
z
|+|
z
–
x
|]
≥ t
t+ [|x–y|+|y–z|+|z–x|]
=Fx∗,y,z(t).
This shows that (.) holds andf has a fixed point inX. The fixed point is .
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Author details
1Department of Mathematics, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 138381, Jeddah, 21323, Saudi Arabia.2Department of
Acknowledgements
This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under Grant No. (319/130/1434). The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR technical and financial support. The authors thank the learned referees for suggestions, which helped to improve the paper.
Received: 22 December 2014 Accepted: 25 June 2015
References
1. Sehgal, VM, Bharucha-Reid, AT: Fixed point of contraction mappings on PM space. Math. Syst. Theory6, 97-100 (1972) 2. Had˘zi´c, O, Pap, E: Fixed Point Theory in Probabilistic Metric Spaces. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2001)
3. Choudhury, BS, Das, KP: A coincidence point result in Menger spaces using a control function. Chaos Solitons Fractals
42, 3058-3063 (2009)
4. Fang, JX: Fixed point theorems of local contraction mappings on Menger spaces. Appl. Math. Mech.12, 363-372 (1991)
5. Fang, JX: Common fixed point theorems of compatible and weak compatible maps in Menger spaces. Nonlinear Anal.71, 1833-1843 (2009)
6. Mihet, D: Altering distances in probabilistic Menger spaces. Nonlinear Anal.71, 2734-2738 (2009)
7. O’Regan, D, Saadati, R: Nonlinear contraction theorems in probabilistic spaces. Appl. Math. Comput.195, 86-93 (2008) 8. Fang, JX, Gao, Y: Common fixed point theorems under strict contractive conditions in Menger spaces. Nonlinear Anal.
70, 184-193 (2009)
9. ´Ciri´c, L: Solving the Banach fixed point principle for nonlinear contractions in probabilistic metric spaces. Nonlinear Anal.72, 2009-2018 (2010)
10. Mustafa, Z, Sims, B: A new approach to generalized metric spaces. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal.7, 289-297 (2006) 11. Mustafa, Z, Obiedat, H, Awawdeh, H: Some fixed point theorem for mapping on complete G-metric spaces. Fixed
Point Theory Appl.2008, Article ID 189870 (2008)
12. Mustafa, Z, Shatanawi, W, Bataineh, M: Existence of fixed point results in G-metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl.
2009, Article ID 283028 (2009)
13. Mustafa, Z, Sims, B: Fixed point theorems for contractive mappings in complete G-metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl.2009, Article ID 917175 (2009)
14. ´Ciri´c, L, Agarwal, RP, Samet, B: Mixed monotone generalized contractions in partially ordered probabilistic metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl.2011, 56 (2011)
15. Zhou, C, Wang, S, ´Ciri´c, L, Alsulami, SM: Generalized probabilistic metric spaces and fixed point theorems. Fixed Point Theory Appl.2014, 91 (2014)
16. Fang, JX: Onϕ-contractions in probabilistic and fuzzy metric spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. (2015). doi:10.1016/j.fss.2014.06.013