(
Received January 28; accepted for publication May 11, 1970.)Supported in part by U.S. Public Health Service research grant lID 00516.
ADDRESS: (J.P.C.) Department of Pediatrics, Medical Center, Baldwin Avenue, Jersey City, New
Jersey 07304.
PEI)IATRICS, Vol. 46, No. 5, November 1970 721
PARTIAL
DELETION
OF
THE
LONG
ARM
OF
CHROMOSOME
E-18
John
P.
Curran,
M.D.,
Farouk
L. Al-Salihi,
M.D.,
and
P.
W.
Allderdice,
Ph.D.
From the Department of Pediatrics, Medical Center, Jersey City, New Jersey and the Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons,
New
York, New YorkABSTRACT.
A
male infant with growth failure and multiple somatic abnormalities is described.Karyotype showed deletion of material from the
long arm of an autosome identified autoradiograph-ically as a number 18.
Abnormalities commonly associated with this
chromosome deletion have been mental
retarda-tion, growth failure, microceplialy, hypertrophic ear parts, mid-face retraction, increased digital whorls, developmental retardation, ocular anoma-lies, fusiform fingers, carp mouth, hypoplastic ear
canals, and genital abnormalities occurring in
males.
The subject of this report presented with
ex-treme growth failure and developmental
retarda-tion. Mid-face dysplasia was mild and
microce-phaly was absent. External genitalia were normal
though
all previously described males hadcryptor-chidisni
or penis abnormality. Findings not previ-ously reported are ankylosis in extension of both knees, palatal pigmentation, and an extra thoracicvertebrum.
Phenotypic analyses of patierlts with an 18q-or 18r chromosome suggest that genie loci
influenc-ing the development of ear canals and the
inci-dence of digital whorls are located near the ends of the long arms. Pediatrics, 46:721, 1970,
CUTIOMO-SOMES, CHROMOSOMES E, CHROMOSOME.S 16-18,
CHROMOSOME ABNORMALITIES, KAROTYPINC,
DELE-TION.
D
E GROUCHY,et
al.1in
1964
were
first
to
call
attention
to a patient
with
partial
deletion
from
the
long
arm
of a single
auto-some
18.
When
Lejeune,
et al.2reported
two
cases
clinically
and
cytologically
sinii-lar
in
1966,
the
entity
was
established
as
a
syndrome.
Common
features
have
been
mental
retardation,
growth
and
develop-mental
failure,
microcephaly,
mid-face
dys-plasia,
fusiform
fingers,
high
incidence
of
fingertip
whorls,
anomalies
of
the
ears
and
eyes, and genital abnormalities in males.
The
purpose
of this
paper
is to describe
a
patient
with
this
chromosomal
aberration
who
presents
with
somatic
abnormalities
that
differ
in
some
respects
from
the
syn-dronie
previously
described.
CASE
REPORT
J. B.
is a 3 10/12 old Caucasian male withSe-vere growth and developmental retardation. He
was born after an estimated gestation of 39 weeks. Birth weight was 2,591 gm. The infant fed poorl, cried weakly, and slept a great deal. At 2 months
weight was 3,636 gm., and at 4 months a heart
murmur was heard. At age 15 months he weighed
5,260 gm., and did not sit, stand, walk, or talk. A
grade Ill/VI short systolic ejection murmur was
noted at the left sternal border, loudest at
intercos-tal spaces 3 and 4. Chest X-ray revealed an
en-larged heart with increased pulmonary blood flow.
At 22 months of age weight was 6,190 gm. At
this time marked limitation of flexion of both knees (less than 10#{176}
)
was noted which, according to the mother, appeared at about 14 months. He sat )Oorly, i)Utdid
not crawl, stand, walk, or talk.Family
History
The mother was a 22-year-old Gravida
II,
ParaII. A
4-year-old daughter by a previous husband is normal. Both parents are alive and well.Physical
Examination
The patient is a 3-vear-10-month-old poorly de-veloped Caucasian male. He appeared active, alert, smiled often, and was interested in his
surround-ings.
lIe responded to requests, but his vocabulary was limited to less than 10 words. Objects werehandled clumsily. He was able to stand and
walk
with wide-based, unsteady gait. Height was 82.5
cm (below the third percentile) and weight was
ap-Fic. 1. Right ear with well rolled helix, prominent anti-helix and anti-tragus,
and
small tragus.722
CHROMOSOME 18q-DELETION SYNDROMEPeared low set vith the vertical axis slanted poste-rioriv. There was a well roiled helix, prominent anti-helix and anti-tragus, and a small tragus
(
Fig.1
)
. The nasal root was broad, the tip elevated,with mild retraction of tile mid-facial structures
and a small mandible
(
Fig. 2 ). The mouth wascarp-like and tile philtrum was absent (Fig. 3). A
highly arched pilate was speckled with many
deeply pigmented irregular macules 1 to 5 mm in size. There was a 5 cm patch of lighter colored hair over the iiiicloccipital area. The eyes appeared hsperteloric with horizontal fissures and no epican-thus. Eye grounds were normal. Both thumbs were I)r0xinlally (lisplaced and held in the palmar plane. Dimpling over the heads of the third metacarpals
was noted On the dorsal surface of both hands.
Fingers were 5I)ifldle-shaPed. Both knees were
ankiyosed in extension and the third toe was over-lapped by the fourth toe bilaterally. Muscle tone was nornial. A grade Ill/VI systolic ejection mur-mur was heard over the left second intercostal space at the sternal border with a loud, widely split second sound at the pulmonic area.
Laboratory Data
Examination of the blood and urine was normal.
Intravenous urogram revealed no abnormalities.
Chest x-rays revealed an enlarged heart with
prom-inence in the area of the left pulmonary artery seg-ment, increased pulmonary vascularitv, and 13 tho-racic ribs with 13 normal thoracic vertebrae
(
Fig.4). Radiographic skeletal survey and bone age
were within normal limits at age 6 months, showed no maturation in the hands and wrists at 2 years, 2
months, and maturation and development were
compatible with 6 months at 3 years. The bones
appeared poorly mineralized. No blood group
stud-ies
were done onthe
patient or his parents.Dermatoglyphic
Examination
Dermatoglyphic studies showed six whorls and
four ulnar loops n the digits and single palmar fiexion creases bilaterally.
Cytogenetic
Studies
Karyotvpes from :3-day cultured leukocytes
showed a partial deletion of the long arm of an
E-group chromosome (46,XY,Eq-) (Fig. 5). For
non-over-I
Fic. 2. Small mandible, backward tilt of ears, mild mid-face retraction, and absent microcephaly are demonstrated.
lapping and the deleted chromosome was nlorpho-logically distinct from the Y chromosonie and the
C-group chromosomes. The slide was then
re-stained with aceto-orcein, coated with AR 10 strip-ping film, exposed in the dark at 4#{176}Cfor 10 days, and developed in D 19.
The two chromosomes 16 had normal
morphol-ogy and were heavily labeled. Among the four
other E-group chromosomes, the deleted chromo-some was one of the most heavily labeled in 19 of 20 cells (Table I and Figure 6).
We concluded that the deleted chromosome was
an 18q-.
The parents were not studied cytologically.
DISCUSSION
Wertelecki,
et al.have
tabulated
the
ab-normalities
associated
with
the
loss
of long
arm material from a single autosome 17 to
18 as mental retardation, atretic ear canals,
prominent
anti-helix
and!
or
anti-tragus,
nystagmus, retinal abnormalities, short
stat-nrc,
microcephaly,
mid-face
dysplasia,
hy-potonia,
congenital
heart
disease,
and
a
high
incidence
of
fingertip
whorls.
Lafour-cade and Lejeune4 listed mental
retarda-tion,
somatic
hypotrophy,
microcephaly,
mid-face dysplasia, hypes-trophy of ear
parts,
carp
mouth,
fusiform
fingers,
sub-acromial
dimples,
and
a high
frequency
of
whorls.
Kushnick
and
Matsushita
found
mental
retardation,
short
stature,
microce-phaly, hypotonia, mid-face dysplasia,
prominent
anti-helix
and/or
anti-tragus,
El
Fic. 3. Carp mouth and absent philtrum.
724 CHROMOSOME
18q-DELETION
SYNDROME
‘1’AiHE
I
(;ItAIN COUNTS OVER CIfRoMoSoniis 17 AND 18 IN TWENTY CELLS
(/tromo.somne.s ranked b,j
(‘cli grain count 1) ci ci ed
number
---
-
- chromosome1 2 .3
1 3 7 ii H
5 7 13 16
3 ‘3 ii S
4 0 0 i 0
5 4 7 11 14
6 3 7 13 14
7 0 1 9 10
S 4 7 11 7
9 0 1 10 2
10 1 4 10 H
11 4 7 S Ii
12 2 4 H 13
13 (1 4 7 6
14 3 5 11 9
15 4 4 6 7
16 (1 1 1t 4
17 S 9 15 10
15 4 9 10
19 2 4 16 7
i0 4 3 13 ii
Iotmiis 51 91 217 183
x 2.33 4.55 10.35 9.15
ocular
abnormalitiies,
hypoplastic
or atretic
ear
canals,
males
with
cryptorchidism
and!
or penis
abnormality,
and
a high
incidence
of
digital
whorls
as
the
principle
findings.
The
17reported
cases
are
summarized
in
Table
II
and
the
principle
findings
listed
in
Table
III.
The
patient
described
in
this
paper
has
13 fully developed thoracic ribs and 13
nor-mal
thoracic
vertebrae. While thiscombina-tion
of
anomalies
has
not
been
reported
previously, Destine, et al.6
called
attention
to one
patient
with
13 ribs
bilaterally
and
it
has since been determined that this child
also has an extra thoracic vertebrum. Ins-ley’s two I)atients had bilateral cervical
ribs and showed extensive anomalies of the
vertebral
column.
Extra
ribs
arc
not
un-usual in the population, but arc more often cervical or lumbar and not associated with extra vertebrae. It is possible that a review
previ-FIG. 4. Chest x-ray of J.B. Enlarged heart, 13 ribs, and 13 thoracic vertebrae are noted.
ously
reported
will
reveal
instances
of
this
dual
anomaly
that
were
overlooked.
The
reported
onset
of ankyosis
at age
14
months
in extension
of both
knees
defies
cx-planation.
Bracing
prior
to
onset
was
de-nied
by
the
mother.
The
deformities
have
not
responded
to
intensive
physiotherapy.
One
of Insley’ss
patients
tended
to assume
a
position
of partial
flexion
and
full
abduction
at the
hips.
In
all
latients
from
whom
data
was
ob-tamed,
an
increased frequencyof
fingertip
whorls
(
40
to
100%)
#{176}is noted. Thefre-quency in our case was 60%.
All
five
phenotypic
males
previously
(Ic-scribed
have
cryptorchidism
and/or
abnor-malitics
of
the
penis.
Our
patient
had
o The normal percentage of digital whorls is
v
____
13-15(D)
__________J
19-20(F)
#{163}*
A*
‘-
______
21-22(G)
‘-
_______
16-18(E)xY
726
CHROMOSOvlE
lSq-DELETION
SYNDROME
‘-3(4)
si
4-5(B)
1ilc6)c71s
6-12(C)
*1
J
1I(;. 5. Karvotvpe vith ptrtial deletion of long arm of one clironlosome 18.
normal external gentalia with
‘el1-de-scended, clinically normal scrotal gonads.
A
highly
arched
palate
is
a well
knovn
feature
of
several
autosomal
syndromes,
in-eluding the 18q-. However, the striking
pig-rnentation
over
the
area
of the
hard
palate
in our patieIt is
apparently
a new
finding.
I
AJ
#{163}
.,.
;
:
1
I
16
.,.
17
18
lSq-.Fic. 6. Partial karvotvixs
ltl)el((l E-tzroup (hronlosonles.
showing terniinallv
The
frequent
occurrence
of mid-face
dys-plasia, atretic or hypoplastic ear canals,
small
mandible,
and
impaired
hearing
mdi-cate abnormal development
of
structures
derived from, or closely associated with, the
first visceral arch. McKenzie1 has
sug-gested that similar anomalies affecting ar-eas of the face, ear, and palate are due to insufficiency of the stapedial artery during
the first 2 months of gestation and he
groups them as the First Arch syndrome.
Atresia
of
the
ear
canals
has
also
beennoted
in
two
of
four
patieiits
vith
an
18r
chromosome
and
all
four
of
these
patients
had
a high
frequency
of fingertip
whorls.4Since the commonly accepted mechanism
of formation
of a ring
chromosonie
requires
deletions of the terminal portions of
both
the short and long arms, it is speculated
that
the genetic locus or loci that influencedevelopment of the ear canals and middle
cars,
as well
as the
high
incidence
of (Iigital
whorls,
may
l)e located
near
the
ends
of the
long
arms
of
the
number
18 chromosomes.h’
.notes
that
this
hypothesis
is
supported by the irese1ce of nornial ear
TABLE
II
SUMMARY OF REPORTED FINDINGS IN 17 CASES OF PARTIAL DELECTION LONG ARM OF CHROMOSOME 18
Crypt
Reference GR M HE MR DR WI, 0.4 FF CM MFD It! SD and/or CUD II PA
1 + + + + + 50% + + + + + + female ? +
Mother 26. father 40 ; absent columella, high palate. eyes deep seated ; prominent chin. masses both buecal areas. brachycephaly; widely spaced nipples; horseshoe kidney ; third toe overlapped by fourth and second. edema of feet.
small masses lateral aspects feet; dimples dorsum of ha’irls. epitrochlear area and lateral aspects patellae; simian position thumbs, bilateral simian lines, absent fiexion crease left fifth finger; absent labiae minora.
2 Casel + + + + + 40% ? + ? + ? + + ? ?
Mother 22, father 25 ; tower skull, prominent forehead and chin, high palate; eyes deep seated, hypertelorism,
anti-mongoloid slant; widely spaced nippleE dimples on hands, simian position of thumbs, web between third and fourth fingers left, clinomlactyly fifth fingers; genu valgum, flat feet, small masses lateral aspects both feet; “Jacksonian” seizures.
Case2 + + + + + 90% + + ? + + + female + + Mother 33, father SI; tower skull, nuchal area flat and broad, prominent malar areas and chin, small masses buccal areas, broad nasal root ;cleft palate; microcornea. unilateral glaucoma and absent anterior chamber, corneal opacity; simian
position of thumbs, dimples dorsum of hands, x-rays show “bouchon de champagne” shape second phalanges, bilateral simian lines; third and fourth toes overlapped by second and fifth.
S Casel’ + + + + ? 80% + ? ? + + ? ? + ?
Case2 + + + + ? 50% + ? ? + + ? ? + ?
CaseS’ + + + + ? 70% + ? ? 0 + P ? 0 :
Case4 + + + + ? 70% + ? ? + + ? ? + ?
18 Casel ? ? ? ? ? ? + ? ? P ? ? ? ? +
Case 2 ? ? P ? ? ? + ? ? ? ? ? female ? +
Patients were siblings; mother’s karyotype showed partial deletion of the long arm (Sf a number 18 chromosome with
translocation of the (leleted material to tIme short arm of a G group chromosome.
S Casel + + 0 + + 60% + ? + 0 0 + + 0 0
Mother 20. father 23; skull bones soft; epicanthiic folds; fingers clenched, left index overlapped middle finger. unilateral
simian line; edema of feet. right second toe overlapped third; bilateral cervical ribs; exostosis right tibia; bilateral
talipes equinovarus.
Case2 + + 0 + + 60% ? + + ? 0 ? + + 0
Mother 25, father 30; plagiocephaly; eyes deep seated with mongoloid slant; prominent upper lip; double ante-cubital flexion creases; small hands; feet small and edematous, second toes dorsally placed; tended to lie with hips partially
flexed and fully abducted; femora slender with coxa s-alga; bilateral cervical ribs, other ribs slender and irregular with the right twelfths rib smaller than the left; multiple vertebral anomalies.
6 Case I 0 ? + ? + 60% + P ? ? 0 ? female 0 7
Mother 40, father 45; mask-like. elongated face; hypertelorism, epicanthus; highly arched palate, dental malocclusion, atd. angle 60#{176}on right, 35#{176}on left; third toes overlapped by second and fourth; pubic hair and breast development age 10.
Case 2 + + + 7 + 100% + + + ? P ? female 0
Mother 32, father 37; epicanthus with mongoloid slant, anomalies of macula; cleft lip; dimples on hands and fingers;
fat pad dorsum of feet, third toes overlapped by fourths; 13 ribs bilaterally.
9 7 + + 7 + ? + + + 7 ? + + 7 7
Mother 33, father 26; mother with positive treponemal-immob. test; large fontanehles; multiple skin folds of neck; widely
spaced nipples; umbilical hernia; hands held in claw position, dystrophic nails; bilateral tahipes calcaneovalgus.
19 + 0 + 7 ? 7 + + + + 0 + female ? +
Mother 25, father 27; wide fontanehles; broad nasal bridges; epicanthal folds; hypoplastk’ ear canals; dimples over knuckles, talipes equinovarus.
5 + + + + + 50% 0 + ? + + ? + + +
Mother 53; thin nose and nostrils; cleft palate; micrognathism; hypoplastic ear canals; retarded bone age; atd. angle less than 300 bilaterally.
Curran + 0 + + + 60% 0 + + + + 0 0 + 0
Mother 23, father 2t; highly arched, pigmented palate; simian position of thumbs, bilateral simian lines; third toes
overlapped by fourth; anklyosis of knee joints; 13 thoracic ribs and 13 thoracic vertebrae; circumscribed area depigmented
hair occipital region.
+=present 0 =absent ?=not mentioned GR=growths retardation M =microcephialy HE =hypertrophy of ear parts MR = mental
retardation DR =developmental retardation Wh =fingertipwhorls OA =ocular abnormality FF =fusiform fingers CM =carp mouth HFD =mid-face dysplasia HI =impaired hearing and/or hypoplastic ear canals SI) =sub-acromial (limples Crypt. and/or PA
7h;.5t 76.5% 76.5% 76.5% 70.6% 64.7 58.8% 5 .9r; 5 . 47 .o;; 41 .!% 4l.’% 41 35.3% 35.3%
c9 .4(;;
83.3/; of Illales
728
CHROMOSOME
18q-DELETION
SYNDROME
TABLE
III
CUMULATIVE PERCENT INCIDENCE OF PIIINCI pr;
FINDINGS REPORTED IN 17 CASES OF 1’AIITIAL
DELETION OF TILE LONG .1(MS
OF C1IRoIosoIE 17--IS
Growth failure
Ilypertropily of external ear l)arts high incidence of digital whorls Ocular abnormalities
Microceplialy Mental retardation
l)eveiopnsental retardation
Fusiforlu fingers
l1 i(l-face dvsplasia
Ilypopiastic ear canals and/or
iIn1)aired hearing
CILq nIOUtIL
Congenital heart (lisease 3rd toe overlapped by 4th
an(i/or 2I1(l
Sub-acromial dimples
Ilypotonia
Cryptorehidislll LIS(l br penis al)normaiity
the
short
arm
of
a
number
18
autosome.
While
it is difficult
to determine
where
nor-mal
ends
and
hypoplasia
begins,
it was
felt
that
our
patient
had
unusually
narrow
ear
canals.
It
was
the
opinion
of
all
examiners
that
J.B.’s congenital heart lesion was an atrial
septal
defect
(
secundum
)
.This
was
con-firmed
by
angiocardiography.
The
cardiac
anomaly was felt to be asymptomatic and
not
a
contributing
factor
to
tile
severe
growth
and
developmental
failure.
DISCUSSION
OF
AUTORADIOGRAPHIC
DATA
Giannelli
and
Howlett
showed
that
the
E-group
chromosomes
may
be
identified
through
comparison
of their
“morphological
index”
and
terminal
labelling
data.
They
obtained
the
morphologic
index
by
dividing
the
arm
ratio
of
each
chromosome
into
its
total
length.
They
found
chromosome
16
had
a high
index
and
heavy
label,
chromo-some
17
had
an
intermediate
index
and
light
label,
and
chromosome
18 had
a low
index
and
a heavy
label.
In
the
present
case
the
chromosomes
16
had
normal
morphology
and
were
heavily
labelled
(
Fig.
6)
.When
grain
counts
were
ranked over the four
chromosomes
17
and
18, the deleted chromosome was one
of the
two
most
heavily
labelled
chromosomes
in
19 of 20
cells
and
was
identified
as an
lSq-chromosome
(
Table
I
)
.Terminal
labelling
has previously been used to identify thede-leted
chromosome
of two
46,18q-
patients.17
In
other
presumptive
46,18q-cases,
the
de-leted
chromosome
has
only
been
identified
morphologically.25O1Sm9
SUMMARY
A patient
with
partial
deletion
of the
long
arm
of
a single
number
18 autosome
is
de-scribed.
He
presents
many
of
the
somatic
abnormalities previously described, though
lacking genital anomalies. The most
com-mon
stigmata have been mentalretarda-tion,
growth
and
developmental
failure,
mi-crocephaly, hypertrophy of ear parts, ocular
al)normalities,
a high
incidence
of
fingertip
whorls, fusiform fingers, mid-face dysplasia,
and
hypoplastic
ear
canals.
REFERENCES
1. Do Grouchy,
J.,
RoverP.,
Salmon,
C.,
and
Lang,
M.
: D#{233}l#{233}tionpartielle des bras longsdu chromosome 18. Path. Biol., 12:579,
1964.
2. Lejeune,
J.,
Berger,R.,
Lafourcade,J.,
and Rethore, M. : La d#{233}l#{233}tionpartielle du bras long du chromosome 18. Individualisation d’un nouvel #{233}tatmorbide. Ann. Genet., 9:32, 1966.3. Wertelecki, W., Schindler, A. NI., and Gerald, P. S. : Partial deletion of chromosome 18. Lancet, 2:641, 1966.
4. Lafourcade,
J., and
Lejeune,J.
: La deficience clue bras long d’un chromosome 18(
18q-), Un. Med. Canada, 97:936, 1968.5. Kushnick, T., and Matsushita, C. : Partial dele-tion of long arms of chroniosome 18.
PEDI-ATRICS, 42:194, 1968.
6. Destine, M. L., Punnett F!. H., Thovichit, S., DiGeorge, A. M., and Weiss, L. : La
d#{233}l#{233}-tion partielle du bras long du chromosome
18 (syndrome 18q-). Rapport de deux cas.
729
7. Punnett,
H. H. : Personal
communication,
1969.
8. Insley,
J.
: Syndrome associated with a defi-ciency of part of the long arm ofchromo-some
no
18. Arch. Dis. Child., 42:140, 19679. Day, E.
J.,
Marshall, R., Macdonald, P. A. C., and Davidson, W. M. : Deleted chromosome 18 with paternal mosaicism. Lancet, 2:1307, 1967.10. McKenzie, J.:
The
First Arch syndrome. Arch. Dis. Child., 33:477, 1958.11.
Wang,
H.
C.,
Melnyk,
J.,
McDonald,
L.
T.,
Uchida, I. A., Carr, D. H., and Goldberg, B.: Ring chromosomes in human beings. Nature,
195:733,
1962.12. Genest, P., Leclerc, R., and Auger, C. : Ring
chromosomes and partial translocation in the
same cell. Lancet, 1 : 1426, 1963.
13. Lucas, M., Kemp, N. H., Ellis, J.
R., and
Mar-shall, R. : A small autosomal ring chromo-some in a female infant with congenital
mal-formations. Ann. Hum. Genet., 27:189,
1963.
14. De Grouchy, J., Leveque, B., Debauchez, C.,
Lamy, M., and Marie, J.: Chromosome
17-18 en anneau et malformations cong#{233}nitales chez une file. Ann. Genet. 7: 17, 1964.
15. De Grouchy,
J.: Chromosome 18: A topologicapproach.
J. Pediat., 66:414, 1965. 16. Giannelli, F., and Howlett, R. M. : Theidentifi-cation of the chromosomes of the E-group
(
16-18 Denver) : An autoradiographic andmeasurement study. Cytogenetics, 6:420,
1967.
17. Reinwein, H., Gorman, L. Z., and Wolf, U.:
Defizienz
am langen
Ann
eines ChromosomsNr. 18 (46,XX18q-).
Z. Kinderheilk.,
101:
152, 1967.
18. Law, E. M., and Masterson,
J. G.
: Partialdele-lion of chromosome 18. Lancet, 2:1137,
1966.
19. Nance, W. E., Higdon, S. H., Chown, B., and Engel, E. : Partial E-18 long-arm deletion. Lancet,
1 :303,
1968.
Acknowledgments