arXiv:1212.6940v1 [astro-ph.SR] 31 Dec 2012
The L dwarf/T dwarf transition: multiplicity, magnetic activity and
mineral meteorology across the hydrogen burning limit.
Adam J. Burgasser1,⋆
University of California San Diego, MC 0424, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA Received XXXX, accepted XXXX
Published online XXXX
Key words infrared: stars, stars: binaries: spectroscopic, stars: low-mass, brown dwarfs, techniques: spectroscopic The transition between the L dwarf and T dwarf spectral classes is one of the most remarkable along the stellar/brown dwarf Main Sequence, separating sources with photospheres containing mineral condensate clouds from those containing methane and ammonia gases. Unusual characteristics of this transition include a 1 µm brightening between late L and early T dwarfs observed in both parallax samples and coeval binaries; a spike in the multiplicity fraction; evidence of increased photometric variability, possibly arising from patchy cloud structures; and a delayed transition for young, planetary-mass objects. All of these features can be explained if this transition is governed by the “rapid” (nonequlibrium) rainout of clouds from the photosphere, triggered by temperature, surface gravity, metallicity and (perhaps) rotational effects. While the underlying mechanism of this rainout remains under debate, the transition is now being exploited to discover and precisely characterize tight (< 1 AU) very low-mass binaries that can be used to test brown dwarf evolutionary and atmospheric theories, and resolved binaries that further constrain the properties of this remarkable transition.
Copyright line will be provided by the publisher
1 Introduction
The L dwarf and T dwarf spectral classes encompass what were until recently the lowest-temperature, lowest mass (VLM) stars and brown dwarfs known, with Tef f ≈ 600–2200 K (see contribution by J. D. Kirkpatrick on the newly-defined Y dwarf class). While these classification classes are defined at different wavelengths (Kirkpatrick et al. 1999; Burgasser et al. 2006a), they are readily distinguished by their infrared (IR) spectra, dominated by H2O, CO, FeH, and alkali ab-sorption for the L dwarfs and H2, H2O, CH4, and NH3 ab-sorption for the T dwarfs. The IR spectral energy distribu-tions (SEDs) of these classes are also distinct, L dwarfs be-ing quite red in near-IR colors (J − K ∼ 1.5–2.5) and T dwarfs being relatively blue (J − K . 1). This variation is due in large part to condensate cloud opacity, which arises as TiO, VO, Fe and other metals condense out of the atmo-sphere to form 10-30 µm grains in the photoatmo-sphere (Ack-erman & Marley 2001; Helling et al. 2008). These grains scatter efficiently across the near-IR, having their greatest influence in the 1.0–1.3 µm gas opacity window and giving rise to the red colors and muted H2O bands in the near-IR spectral of these objects (Allard et al. 2001). There are also pronounced variations in L and T dwarf SEDs that correlate with differences in surface gravity, metallicity, condensate cloud properties, and nonequilibrium chemistry (Looper et al. 2008; Burgasser et al. 2008; Cushing et al. 2010).
⋆ Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected]
2 Evolution across the L/T transition
Given their distinct spectral morphologies, and the fact that all brown dwarfs evolve through the L and T spectral se-quence as they cool, the transition between these classes— defined here as spectral types L8 to T5—is key to under-standing the atmospheric chemistry, thermal evolution and statistical distribution of brown dwarfs in the Galaxy. For-mally, the start of the T dwarf class is defined by the emer-gence of the 1.6 µm CH4 band, but the observed changes in SED across the L/T transition also reflects a sudden re-moval of condensate grain opacity from brown dwarf photo-spheres over a relatively narrow Tef f range. The rapidity of this shift is evident in the brightening of early-type T dwarfs around 1 µm—the so-called “J-band bump”—that is ob-served in both parallax samples (Tinney et al. 2003; Vrba et al. 2004) and between components of binaries spanning the transition (Burgasser et al. 2006b; Liu et al. 2006; Looper et al. 2008; see below). As opacity in this region is dominated by condensates in the L dwarfs, the observed brightening, along with the resurgence of FeH and alkali line absorption in the 1 µm region (Burgasser et al. 2002), indicates a loss of condensates rather than obscuration from emergent CH4 ab-sorption. A relatively sharp transition is also suggested by the small change in luminosity that encompasses the tran-sition (Golimowski et al. 2004), the rarity of early-type T dwarfs in current search samples (Metchev et al. 2008), and an apparent excess of binaries at the L/T transition (Bur-gasser 2007a). These lines of evidence suggest that the L/T transition may be a relatively short-lived phase of brown dwarf evolution, although consideration must be taken into
1.0 1.5 2.0 Wavelength (µm) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 Normalized F λ 1404-3159 2047-0718 T0.0 (L7.5) 0602+4043 T4.5 (T4.5) χ2 = 2.59 Spectral Type 15.5 15.0 14.5 14.0 MJ (MKO) L4 L6 L8 T0 T2 T4 T6
Fig. 1 Left: Adaptive optics images of the L/T transition binary 2MASS J1404-3159AB at J (top) and Ks(bottom). Primary (A) and secondary (B) are labeled, and are designated based on their Ks-band flux (from Looper et al. 2008).
Center: Combined-light near-infrared spectrum of 2MASS J1404-3159AB (black line) compared to the best fit template
binary (green or medium grey line) composed of a T0 primary (red or dark grey line) and a T4.5 secondary (blue or lower light grey line), based on resolved photometry. The secondary is considerably brighter than the primary at 1.05 µm and 1.27 µm (from Burgasser et al. 2010). Right: Absolute MKO J -band magnitudes of resolved L/T transition binaries with measured parallaxes as a function of component type, based on the compilation of Dupuy & Liu (2012). Primaries are indicated by red (or light grey) circles, secondaries by blue (or dark grey) squares, and pairs are joined. Lines that slope upward, including 2MASS J1404-3159AB (large black circles), are flux reversal binaries.
account for possible feedback in the thermal evolution at this phase (Saumon & Marley 2008).
Static 1D atmosphere models for brown dwarfs which parameterize condensate cloud properties (e.g., fsedin Ack-erman & Marley 2001) predict a much slower decline in condensate opacity with Tef f as cloud tops sink to deeper layers. (Marley et al. 2002). To reproduce the transition, a change in cloud surface coverage or condensate grain prop-erties must be introduced. The first possibility, inspired by the patchy tropospheric clouds of Jupiter and Saturn, pre-dicts that holes in the cloud layer form at the L/T transi-tion, allowing “hotter” light to emerge from below (Acker-man & Marley 2001; Burgasser et al. 2002; Marley et al. 2010). The second possibility, a global change in the cloud thickness at the L/T transition, may reflect a “rainout” of the upper cloud decks by dynamic perturbations (Knapp et al. 2004; Saumon & Marley 2008). Either of these cases may be driven by changes in the convective structure of the photosphere; properly tuned, both can reproduce the J -band brightening and changes to brown dwarf SEDs (Cushing et al. 2008)
A potential discriminator of these hypotheses is the pos-sibility that cloud fragmentation could induce more frequent and intense variability at the L/T transition, particularly around 1 µm, as cool clouds and hot holes rotate in and out of view. The recent detection of two strongly variable brown dwarfs, SIMP J0136+0933 (Artigau et al. 2009) and 2MASS J2139+0220 (Radigan et al. 2012), both of which are early-type T dwarfs, are seen to support this idea. However, there is currently limited theoretical work on cloud structure in rapidly rotat-ing brown dwarfs to make a robust prediction of this effect
(Schubert & Zhang 2000; Sanchez-Lavega 2001), and vari-ability samples are currently too sparse to robustly identify trends. As both Hα and radio emission have been detected in cool T dwarfs (Route & Wolszczan 2012), magnetic spots or auroral emission cannot be ruled out as a source for this variability (Lane et al. 2007; Berger et al. 2009).
3 Binaries and the L/T transition
3.1 Resolved binaries: tracing excessOne of the key lines of evidence that condensates are re-moved from the photospheres of L/T transition objects is the 1 µm brightening observed between “flux reversal” bi-naries that straddle this transition. Figure 1 shows an exam-ple of one such source, 2MASS J1404-3159AB (Looper et al. 2008), whose T4.5 secondary is ∼0.5 mag brighter at J and ∼1 mag fainter at K than its T0 primary. The excess is concentrated in the 1.05 µm and 1.27 µm flux peaks, the re-gions most affected by condensate opacity in the L dwarfs. However, not all binaries that straddle the L/T transition are flux-reversal systems; there is in fact considerable variation in the absolute brightnesses and relative flux trends among these systems, suggesting that additional secondary param-eters play a role in governing when and how quickly brown dwarfs evolve across the L/T transition (see below).
3.2 Spectral binaries: probing small separations The dramatic SED changes that occur across the L/T tran-sition also facilitate the identification of spectral binaries,
or blended-light pairs. One of the first L/T binaries discov-ered, 2MASS J0518-2828AB, was initially recognized as a peculiar source whose near-infrared spectrum could be re-produced as a late L dwarf and mid-type T dwarf composite (Cruz et al. 2004). Since then, nearly two dozen spectral binaries and binary candidates have been identified (Bur-gasser 2007b; Bur(Bur-gasser et al. 2008a, 2010, 2011, 2012; Gelino & Burgasser 2010; Kirkpatrick et al. 2010; Geiβler et al. 2011). Some have been resolved, allowing for robust assessments of their component SEDs, orbital characteris-tics and physical properties. However, spectral binaries also allow us to identify systems that are too tightly separated or too distant to be resolved by direct imaging. This is relevant to our understanding brown dwarf formation, as the inci-dence of tight brown dwarf binaries (ρ <1 AU), and hence the overall binary fraction, remains poorly constrained (3– 30%; Basri & Reiners 2006; Joergens 2008; Blake et al. 2010). Identification of these intrinsically faint systems through radial velocity (RV) monitoring and microlensing programs remains inefficient. Yet two of the four known VLM bina-ries with ρ <0.5 AU 2MASS J0320-0446AB (Burgasser et al. 2008; Blake et al. 2008) and SDSS J0006-0852AB (Burgasser et al. 2012), were both identified as spectral bi-naries. By combining the component Tef fs of these sys-tems (from spectral binary analysis) with their system mass function (from the RV orbit), one obtains constraints on the age and orbital inclination of these systems based on evo-lutionary models (Fig. 2). Where independent age informa-tion is available, the evoluinforma-tionary models themselves can be tested.1 Tight spectral binaries therefore complement stud-ies of astrometric binarstud-ies in testing brown dwarf theory (Dupuy et al. 2009; Konopacky et al. 2010), but on con-siderably shorter timescales.
Not all blended-light systems will turn out to be physi-cal binaries. A case in point is the photometriphysi-cally variable T2.5 dwarf 2MASS J2139+0220, which was identified as a spectral binary (Burgasser et al. 2010), but is unresolved in HST imaging (Radigan et al. 2012) and does not appear to be an RV variable (Khandrika et al. 2012). The spectral binary nature of this source may instead reflect the distinct SEDs emerging from cloudy and non-cloudy regions on its surface, and may suggests a method of finding other highly variable sources.
4 Parameters governing the L/T transition
While the spectral changes encompassing the L/T transi-tion are driven largely by condensate depletransi-tion, what serves as the trigger? Temperature is clearly a factor, as analy-ses of color-magnitude diagrams suggest that most brown dwarfs transition from late-L to early-T over a narrow Tef f range (100–200 K) around 1200 K (Faherty et al. 2012).1 This is the case for SDSS J0006-0852AB, where the lack of Hα
emis-sion in both SDSS J0006-0852A and its wide companion LP 704-48 in-dicate an age&8 Gyr, consistent with the &4 Gyr age inferred from the analysis described above.
0.1 1.0 10.0 Age (Gyr) 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 Mass (M sun ) H-burning Li-burning D-burning SM08 cloudless models M2 RV Constraint (sin i < 1) t > 2.2
Fig. 2 Age and mass constraints for the tight spec-tral binary 2MASS J0320-0446AB, based on component spectral types (curved solid and dotted lines), RV orbit (dashed line) and evolutionary models from Saumon & Marley (2008). This analysis constrains the primary mass to 0.085±0.025 M⊙and the age of the system to >2 Gyr (from Burgasser & Blake 2009).
However, other parameters also play a role in triggering this transition. Young, low surface gravity brown dwarfs re-tain their clouds to lower Tef fs than field objects (Metchev & Hillenbrand 2006; Saumon & Marley 2008), as recently demonstrated by the unusually “dusty” exoplanets around HR 8799 (Currie et al. 2011) and 2MASS J1207-3932 (Bar-man et al. 2011). Theoretical work also supports a strong gravity dependence on the onset of the L/T transition (Mar-ley et al. 2012). Condensate production appears to be sup-pressed in metal-poor L dwarfs based on their enhanced TiO and metal-line absorption and extremely blue near-infrared colors (Burgasser et al. 2003; Gizis & Harvin 2006); the transition to the as-yet undiscovered T subdwarf class may be far less dramatic as a result (Burrows et al. 2006). Fi-nally, rotation may play a major role in driving surface in-homogeneities that disrupt cloud layers, although rotation measures (variability periods, v sin i) are challenging for these intrinsically faint objects. Notably, the variable early-T dwarfs SIMP J0136+0933 and 2MASS J2139+0220, both of which may have highly disrupted cloud decks, also have very different variability periods (2.4 hr and 7.8 hr, respec-tively). Additional examples are needed to quantify these effects.
5 Future work
The mechanism that drives the L/T transition remains an outstanding problem in brown dwarf atmospheric science, and can be addressed by expanding our sample and charac-terization of single and multiple sources spanning this tran-sition. Multi-wavelength variability studies hold the promise
of confirming or refuting the patchy cloud model for this transition, but proper interpretation of observed lightcurves and the incidence of variability requires more detailed the-oretical work on the 3D structure and temporal variation of rotating brown dwarf atmospheres. While 2D dynamic models have found that gravity waves can play an important role in stirring the photosphere (Freytag et al. 2010), a com-plete picture will require a 3D calculation that includes rota-tion effects. Given the advances in 3D modeling in interpret-ing brightness variations for transitinterpret-ing exoplanets (Knutson et al. 2007) and magnetic topologies of M dwarfs (Brown-ing 2008), such work should be feasible.
Detailed characterization—resolved spectroscopy, par-allaxes, and precise orbit determinations—of binaries strad-dling the L/T transition can provide insight into the role that secondary parameters play in triggering the depletion of condensates; tight spectral binaries in particular can bring mass and age information to this problem. Finally, there is increasing evidence that sulfide cloud layers are emerging at the transition between the T and Y spectral classes (Morley et al. 2012). Lessons learned from mineral cloud behavior at the L/T transition will be essential for understanding the properties of these very cool atmospheres.
Acknowledgements. The author thanks Mark Marley, Jacqueline
Radigan and Didier Saumon for helpful comments in the prepara-tion of this article.
References
Ackerman, A. S. & Marley, M. S. 2001, ApJ , 556, 872
Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H., Alexander, D. R., et al. 2001, ApJ , 556, 357
Artigau, ´E., Bouchard, S., Doyon, R., et al. 2009, ApJ , 701, 1534 Barman, T. S., Macintosh, B., Konopacky, Q. M., et al. 2011,
ApJ l, 735, L39
Basri, G. & Reiners, A. 2006, AJ , 132, 663
Berger, E., Rutledge, R. E., Phan-Bao, N., et al. 2009, ApJ , 695, 310
Blake, C. H., Charbonneau, D., & White, R. J. 2010, ApJ , 723, 684
Blake, C. H., Charbonneau, D., White, R. J., et al. 2008, ApJ L, 678, L125
Browning, M. K. 2008, ApJ , 676, 1262 Burgasser, A. J. 2007a, ApJ , 659, 655 Burgasser, A. J. 2007b, AJ , 134, 1330
Burgasser, A. J. & Blake, C. H. 2009, AJ , 137, 4621
Burgasser, A. J., Cruz, K. L., Cushing, M., et al. 2010, ApJ , 710, 1142
Burgasser, A. J., Geballe, T. R., Leggett, S. K., et al. 2006a, ApJ , 637, 1067
Burgasser, A. J., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Burrows, A., et al. 2003, ApJ , 592, 1186
Burgasser, A. J., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Cruz, K. L., et al. 2006b, ApJ S, 166, 585
Burgasser, A. J., Liu, M. C., Ireland, M. J., et al. 2008a, ApJ , 681, 579
Burgasser, A. J., Looper, D. L., Kirkpatrick, J. D., et al. 2008b, ApJ , 674, 451
Burgasser, A. J., Luk, C., Dhital, S., et al. 2012, ApJ , 757, 110
Burgasser, A. J., Marley, M. S., Ackerman, A. S., et al. 2002, ApJ L, 571, L151
Burgasser, A. J., Sitarski, B. N., Gelino, C. R., et al. 2011, ApJ , 739, 49
Burrows, A., Sudarsky, D., & Hubeny, I. 2006, ApJ , 640, 1063 Cruz, K. L., Burgasser, A. J., Reid, I. N., et al. 2004, ApJ L, 604,
L61
Currie, T., Burrows, A., Itoh, Y., et al. 2011, ApJ , 729, 128 Cushing, M. C., Marley, M. S., Saumon, D., et al. 2008, ApJ , 678,
1372
Cushing, M. C., Saumon, D., & Marley, M. S. 2010, AJ , 140, 1428
Dupuy, T. J. & Liu, M. C. 2012, ApJ S, 201, 19
Dupuy, T. J., Liu, M. C., & Ireland, M. J. 2009, ApJ , 692, 729 Faherty, J. K., Burgasser, A. J., Walter, F. M., et al. 2012, ApJ ,
752, 56
Freytag, B., Allard, F., Ludwig, H., et al. 2010, A&A, 513, A19 Geißler, K., Metchev, S., Kirkpatrick, J. D., et al. 2011, ApJ , 732,
56
Gelino, C. R. & Burgasser, A. J. 2010, AJ , 140, 110 Gizis, J. E. & Harvin, J. 2006, AJ , 132, 2372
Golimowski, D. A., Leggett, S. K., Marley, M. S., et al. 2004, AJ , 127, 3516
Helling, C., Dehn, M., Woitke, P., & Hauschildt, P. H. 2008, ApJ L, 675, L105
Joergens, V. 2008, A&A, 492, 545
Khandrika, H., Burgasser, A. J., Melis, C., et al. 2013, AJ, submit-ted
Kirkpatrick, J. D., Looper, D. L., Burgasser, A. J., et al. 2010, ApJ S, 190, 100
Kirkpatrick, J. D., Reid, I. N., Liebert, J., et al. 1999, ApJ , 519, 802
Knapp, G. R., Leggett, S. K., Fan, X., et al. 2004, AJ , 127, 3553 Knutson, H. A., Charbonneau, D., Allen, L. E., et al. 2007, Nature,
447, 183
Konopacky, Q. M., Ghez, A. M., Barman, T. S., et al. 2010, ApJ , 711, 1087
Lane, C., Hallinan, G., Zavala, R. T., et al. 2007, ApJ L, 668, L163 Liu, M. C., Leggett, S. K., Golimowski, D. A., et al. 2006, ApJ ,
647, 1393
Looper, D. L., Gelino, C. R., Burgasser, A. J., et al. 2008a, ApJ , 685, 1183
Looper, D. L., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Cutri, R. M., et al. 2008b, ApJ , 686, 528
Marley, M. S., Saumon, D., Cushing, M., et al. 2012, ApJ , 754, 135
Marley, M. S., Saumon, D., & Goldblatt, C. 2010, ApJ L, 723, L117
Marley, M. S., Seager, S., Saumon, D., et al. 2002, ApJ , 568, 335 Metchev, S. A. & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2006, ApJ , 651, 1166 Metchev, S. A., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Berriman, G. B., et al. 2008,
ApJ , 676, 1281
Morley, C. V., Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 172
Radigan, J., Jayawardhana, R., Lafreni`ere, D., et al. 2012, ApJ , 750, 105
Route, M. & Wolszczan, A. 2012, ApJ L, 747, L22 Sanchez-Lavega, A. 2001, A&A, 377, 354 Saumon, D. & Marley, M. S. 2008, ApJ , 689, 1327
Schubert, G. & Zhang, K. 2000, in Astronomical Society of the Pa-cific Conference Series, Vol. 212, From Giant Planets to Cool Stars, ed. C. A. Griffith & M. S. Marley, p. 210
Tinney, C. G., Burgasser, A. J., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. 2003, AJ , 126, 975
Vrba, F. J., Henden, A. A., Luginbuhl, C. B., et al. 2004, AJ , 127, 2948
