• No results found

1) Consider a system with closed loop transfer function p

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "1) Consider a system with closed loop transfer function p"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1 ECE-320: Linear Control Systems

Homework 5

Due: Thursday April 10 at the beginning of class

1) Consider a system with closed loop transfer function o( ) p p k G s

s k

α α

=

+ + . The nominal values for the

parameters are kp =1 and α =2.

a) Determine an expression for the sensitivity of the closed loop system to variations in kp. Your final answer should be written as numbers and the complex variable s.

b) Determine an expression for the sensitivity of the closed loop system to variations inα. Your final answer should be written as numbers and the complex variable s.

c) Determine expressions for the magnitude of the sensitivity functions in terms of frequency, ω d) As ω→ ∞ the system is more sensitive to which of the two parameters?

2) Consider the plant

0

1

3 ( )

0.5 p

G s

s s

α α

= =

+ +

where 3 is the nominal value of α0 and 0.5 is the nominal value ofα1. In this problem we will investigate the sensitivity of closed loop systems with various types of controllers to these two parameters. We will assume we want the settling time of our system to be 0.5 seconds and the steady state error for a unit step input to be less than 0.1.

a) (ITAE Model Matching) Since this is a first order system, we will use the first order ITAE model,

( ) o o

o G s

s

ω ω

= +

i) For what value of ωowill we meet the settling time requirements and the steady state error requirements?

ii) Determine the corresponding controllerG sc( ).

iii) Show that the closed loop transfer function (using the parameterized form of G sp( ) and the controller from part ii) is

0

1 0

8

( 0.5) 3

( )

8

( ) ( 0.5)

3 o

s G s

s s s

α

α α

+ =

+ + +

iv) Show that the sensitivity of G so( )to variations in α0 is given by 0

0 8

G s

S s

α = +

v) Show that the sensitivity of G so( )to variations in α1 is given by

1 2

0.5 8.5 4

o

G s

S

s s

α

− =

(2)

2 b) (Proportional Control) Consider a proportional controller, with kp =2.5.

i) Show that the closed loop transfer function is 0

1 0

2.5 ( )

2.5 o

G s s

α

α α

=

+ +

ii) Show that the sensitivity of G so( )to variations in α0 is given by 0 0

0.5 8

G s

S s

α

+ =

+

iii) Show that the sensitivity of G so( )to variations in α1 is given by 1

0.5 8

o

G S

s

α

− =

+

c) (Proportional+Integral Control) Consider a PI controller with kp =4 and ki =40.

i) Show that the closed loop transfer function is 0

1 0

4 ( 10) ( )

( ) 4 ( 10) o

s G s

s s s

α

α α

+ =

+ + +

ii) Show that the sensitivity of G so( )to variations in α0 is given by 0

0 2

( 0.5) 12.5 120

G s s

S

s s

α

+ =

+ +

iii) Show that the sensitivity of G so( )to variations in α1 is given by 1 2

0.5 12.5 120

o

G s

S

s s

α

− =

+ +

d) Using Matlab, simulate the unit step response of each type of controller. Plot all responses on one graph. Use different line types and a legend. Turn in your plot and code. Do not make separate graphs

for each system!

e) Using Matlab and subplot, plot the sensitivity to α0 for each type of controller on one graph at the top of the page, and the sensitivity to α1 on one graph on the bottom of the page. Be sure to use different line types and a legend. Turn in your plot and code. Only plot up to about 8 Hz (50 rad/sec) using a semilog scale with the sensitivity in dB (see next page). Do not make separate graphs for each

system!

In particular, these results should show you that the model matching method, which essentially tries and cancel the plant, are generally more sensitive to getting the plant parameters correct than the PI

controller for low frequencies. However, for higher frequencies the methods are all about the same.

Hint: If ( ) 2 2

2 10 s T s

s s

=

+ + , plot the magnitude of the frequency response using:

T = tf([2 0],[1 2 10]); w = logspace(-1,1.7,1000); [M,P]= bode(T,w);

(3)

3 3) For the following two circuits,

show that the state variable descriptions are given by

[

]

1 1

( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( ) 0 [0] ( ) 1

1 1

( ) ( ) ( )

b

L L L

in B in

c c c

a a

R

t L L t L t

v t y t R v t

t t

i i

t R C

i d

v v v

d

C R

t

C

  

   

     

= + = +

     

     

  

 

1

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( ) 0 ( )

( ) 1 ( ) ( )

0 0

a b

L a b L a b L b

a b

b

in in

c c a b c a b

R R

t L R R L t R R t R

L R

i i i

d

v t v t R R v t y t R R v t R R v t

dt

C

 

 = +  + + = −  +

   

    +   +

        

 

 

(4)

4 4) For the following circuit, the state variables are the current through the inductor and the voltage across the capacitor. Determine a state variable model for this system. Specifically, you need to identify the A, B, C, and D matrices/vectors/scalars.

Prelab for Lab 4, to be turned in with your homework

5) One of the things that will be coming up in lab more and more is the limitation of the amplitude of the control signal, or the control effort. This is also a problem for most practical systems. In this problem we will do some simple analysis to better understand why Matlab's sisotool won't give us a good

estimate of the control effort for some types of systems, and why dynamic prefilters can often really help us out here.

a) For the system below,

show that U(s) and R(s) are related by

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

1 ( ) ( ) c pf

p c

G s G s

U s R s

G s G s

= +

b) For many types of controllers, the maximum value of the control signal is just after the step is applied, at t=0+. Although most of the time we are concerned with steady state values and use the final value Theorem in the s-plane, in this case we want to use the initial value Theorem, which can be written as

+ -

( )

(5)

5

0

lim ( ) lim ( ) s

t

u t sU s

+ →∞

→ =

If the system input is a step of amplitude A, show that

( ) ( ) (0 ) lim

1 ( ) ( ) c pf s

p c

AG s G s u

G s G s

+ →∞

= +

This result shows very clearly that the initial control signal is directly proportional to the amplitude of the input signal, which is pretty intuitive.

c) Now let's assume

( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( )

( ) p ( ) pf

c

c p pf

c p pf

N s N s

N s

G G G

D s D s D

s s s

s

= = =

If we want to look at the initial value for a unit step, we need to look at

( ) ( ) 1 ( ) ( )

(0 ) lim lim

1 ( ) ( ) 1 ( ) ( )

c pf c pf

s s

c p c p

sG s G s G s G s

u

G s G s s G s G s

+

→∞ →∞

= =

+ +

Let's also then define

( ) ( ) ( )

1 ( ) ( ) c pf

c p

G s G s

U s

G s G s =

+

so that

(0 ) lim ( ) s

u + U s

→∞ =  Show that ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) pf p c pf pf c p N s U s N s D s

D s D s

N s D s

=     +          and

degU =degNpf −max degDc−degNc+degDpf, degNp−degDp+degDpf

where degYis the degree of polynomial Y.

d) Since we are going to take the limit as s→ ∞, we need the degree of U s( ) to be less than or equal to

zero for a step input to have a finite u(0 )+ . Why?

(6)

6 e) If the prefilter is a constant, show that in order to have a finite (0 )u + we must have

degDc≥degNc

f) If the numerator of the prefilter is a constant, then in order to have a finite (0 )u + we must have

degDc−degNc+degDpf ≥0 or − +2 degDpf ≥0

g) For P, I, D, PI, PD, PID, and lead controllers, determine if (0 )u + is finite if the prefilter is a constant.

References

Related documents

While the results in simulation stage one found in Chapter 4 show that the FDR method controls the type I error rate and has slightly higher rejection rate than Dunnett’s test, these

Conclusions: These results suggest that the contrasting fire potential between heathland and forest, and thus the sharp tree line would be maintained, or possibly

i) Brisbane---Port Macquarie ii) Sydney---- Port Macquarie iii) Sydney---- Canberra and iv) Brisbane----Emerald. The route covered by Qantas Airline is almost ever

Indeed, as the eighteenth century progressed, far from revealing growing animosity, the evidence relating to the French prisoners of war demonstrates a widening appropriation of

The application of salicylic acid mitigated the toxic effects of NaCl stress on maize seedlings and considerably improved root and shoot growth, photosynthetic pigments, fresh

The 6 most important factors include the insufficient readiness for change, lack of systematic plan for organization change, fast solution expectation, the focus of change

Five of the CWPs under study were characterised further by Western blot analysis of total cell extracts or S-layer preparations of the C.difficile clinical

The main objective of this study was to identify the factors influencing young Brazilians’ engagement with Facebook, by extending an existing model of social media participation