• No results found

6 O Acetyl­codeine

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "6 O Acetyl­codeine"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

organic papers

o2582

Kolevet al. C

20H23NO4 doi:10.1107/S1600536805022129 Acta Cryst.(2005). E61, o2582–o2584

Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports

Online

ISSN 1600-5368

6-

O

-Acetylcodeine

Tsonko Kolev,aRumyana Bakalska,bBoris Shivachevaand Rosica Petrovaa*

aBulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of

Organic Chemistry, Acad G. Bonchev Street, Building 9, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria, and bUniversity of Plovdiv, Department of Organic

Chemistry, 24 Tzar Assen Street, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Key indicators Single-crystal X-ray study T= 290 K

Mean(C–C) = 0.006 A˚ Rfactor = 0.049 wRfactor = 0.126 Data-to-parameter ratio = 8.5

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

#2005 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain – all rights reserved

The title compound (systematic name: 6-acetoxy-4,5 -epoxy-3-methoxy-17-methyl-morphin-7-ene), C20H23NO4,

crystal-lizes with one molecule in the asymmetric unit. The molecular structure exhibits features typical of morphine derivatives with a T configuration. The three-dimensional packing is

stabilized by intermolecular C—H N and C—H

inter-actions.

Comment

6-O-Acetylcodeine, (I), was synthesized as a part of our study on opium alkaloids. The transformation of morphine deriva-tives into different metabolites is a matter of practical interest for detecting opiates in blood or urine. Although the studied compound has long been known as a urinary marker to detect the use of street heroin, its crystal structure has not been reported in the literature until now.

The molecule of (I) has the characteristic T-shape of clas-sical opiates, with a dihedral angle between the mean planes of theA/B/CandD/Erings (see scheme) of 80.56 (8); the rings

are denoted following commonly used nomenclature for opiates. The main structural features of the molecule are very close to those of codeine, heroin and morphine (Canfieldet al., 1979, 1987; Gylbert, 1973). The ring fusions and conformations are similar to those previously reported for morphine deriv-atives (Gelders & de Ranter, 1979; Petrickova et al., 2002; Moodyet al., 1997). Aromatic ringAis planar,Bis close to an

envelope, C and D assume half-chair conformations and E

assumes a chair form (Table 1). The conformation about the single C—C bonds within the rings is staggered, except for those along the C5—C6 bond which is eclipsed, with an O2—

C5—C6—O3 torsion angle of 0.8 (5)(Moss, 1996).

(2)

The three-dimensional arrangement of the molecules is shown in Fig. 2. Two distinct types of weak interactions are

observed (Table 2); C5—H5 N1 contacts connect molecules

along theaaxis to form chains, while C—HA contacts link

the chains along thebaxis. The angle between the normal to

the plane of the aromatic unit and the line linking C20 and the centroid of the ring (Cg1) is 7.35 (15).

An independent structure determination of 6-O

-acetyl-codeine is reported in the preceding paper (Sonaret al., 2005).

Experimental

Compound (I) was synthesized according to Huang et al. (1999). Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained by slow evaporation of an ethyl acetate solution at room temperature.

Crystal data

C20H23NO4 Mr= 341.39

Orthorhombic,P212121 a= 8.628 (2) A˚

b= 12.727 (2) A˚

c= 15.4842 (19) A˚

V= 1700.3 (5) A˚3

Z= 4

Dx= 1.334 Mg m

3

MoKradiation Cell parameters from 22

reflections

= 18.3–19.7

= 0.09 mm1

T= 290 (2) K Prism, colorless 0.250.250.25 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Non–profiled!/2scans 4181 measured reflections 1928 independent reflections 1093 reflections withI> 2(I)

Rint= 0.077

max= 26.0 h= 0!10

k= 0!15

l=19!19 3 standard reflections

frequency: 120 min intensity decay: 5%

Refinement

Refinement onF2 R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.049 wR(F2) = 0.126 S= 0.98 1928 reflections 226 parameters

H-atom parameters constrained

w= 1/[2(F

o2) + (0.0562P)2]

whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3

(/)max< 0.001

max= 0.20 e A˚

3

[image:2.610.315.566.73.242.2]

min=0.19 e A˚3

Table 1

Selected torsion angles ().

O2—C4—C12—C13 4.3 (5) C13—C5—O2—C4 32.5 (4) C13—C5—C6—C7 4.8 (5) C5—C6—O3—C19 76.4 (5) C6—C7—C8—C14 1.0 (8) C7—C8—C14—C13 24.8 (6) C14—C9—N1—C16 62.5 (4) C14—C9—C10—C11 37.8 (6)

C10—C11—C12—C13 6.8 (7) C4—C12—C13—C5 23.3 (5) C11—C12—C13—C15 86.5 (5) C15—C13—C14—C9 64.5 (4) C13—C15—C16—N1 51.2 (5) O4—C19—O3—C6 11.8 (7) C20—C19—O3—C6 166.1 (4)

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (A˚ ,).

D—H A D—H H A D A D—H A

C5—H5 N1i

0.98 2.42 3.363 (5) 163 C20—H20C Cg1ii 0.96 2.52 3.421 (2) 157 Symmetry codes: (i)xþ1

2;yþ 1

2;zþ1; (ii)xþ2;yþ 1 2;zþ

1

2.Cg1 is the centroid

of ringA

H atoms were placed in idealized positions (C—H = 0.93–0.98 A˚ ) and constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). In the absence of significant anomalous scattering effects, Friedel pairs were merged.

Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994); cell refinement:CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction:XCAD4(Harms & Wocadlo, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97

(Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure:SHELXL97

(Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP3 for Windows

(Farrugia, 1997) andMERCURY(Version 1.3; Bruno et al., 2002); software used to prepare material for publication:WinGX(Farrugia, 1999).

organic papers

Acta Cryst.(2005). E61, o2582–o2584 Kolevet al. C

20H23NO4

o2583

Figure 1

The molecular structure of (I), showing the atom-numbering scheme and 50% probability displacement ellipsoids.

Figure 2

The packing of the 6-O-acetylcodeine molecules. The dotted lines indicate C—H N interactions. [Symmetry codes: (i)1

2+x, 1y, 1z;

(ii) 2x,1 2+y,

[image:2.610.315.565.289.536.2]
(3)

TK thanks the DAAD and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for a grant within the priority programme (Stability Pact for South-Eastern Europe). This work has been supported by the Bulgarian National Fund of Scientific Research (contracts Nos. X-1213 and F-1212).

References

Bruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Edgington, P. R., Kessler, M., Macrae, C. F., McCabe, P., Pearson, J. & Taylor, R. (2002).Acta Cryst.B58, 389–397.

Canfield, D., Barrick, J. & Giessen, B. C. (1979).Acta Cryst.B35, 2806–2809. Canfield, D., Barrick, J. & Giessent, B. C. (1987).Acta Cryst.C43, 977–979. Enraf–Nonius (1994).CAD-4 EXPRESS. Enraf–Nonius, Delft, The

Nether-lands.

Farrugia, L. J. (1997).J. Appl. Cryst.30, 565. Farrugia, L. J. (1999).J. Appl. Cryst.32, 837–838.

Gelders, Y. G. & de Ranter, C. J. (1979).Acta Cryst.B35, 1111–1116. Gylbert, L. (1973).Acta Cryst.B29, 1630–1635.

Harms, K. & Wocadlo, S. (1995).XCAD4. University of Marburg, Germany. Huang, B., Lu, Y., Ji, B. & Christodoulou, A. P. (1999). US Patent No. 6 008

355.

Moody, P. C. E., Shikotra, N., French, C. E., Bruce, N. C. & Scrutton, N. S. (1997).Acta Cryst.D53, 619–621.

Moss, G. P. (1996).Pure Appl. Chem.68, 2193–2222.

Petrickova, H., Jegorov, A., Husak, M. & Cisarova, I. (2002).Acta Cryst.A58

(Supplement), C-126.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXL97 and SHELXS97. University of Go¨ttingen, Germany.

Sonar, V. N., Parkin, S. & Crooks, P. A. (2005).Acta Cryst. E61, o2579– o2581.

organic papers

o2584

Kolevet al. C

(4)

supporting information

sup-1 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o2582–o2584

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o2582–o2584 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536805022129]

6-

O

-Acetylcodeine

Tsonko Kolev, Rumyana Bakalska, Boris Shivachev and Rosica Petrova

6α-acetoxy-4,5α-epoxy-3-methoxy-17-methyl-morphin-7-ene

Crystal data

C20H23NO4

Mr = 341.39

Orthorhombic, P212121 Hall symbol: P 2ac 2ab a = 8.628 (2) Å b = 12.727 (2) Å c = 15.4842 (19) Å V = 1700.3 (5) Å3

Z = 4 F(000) = 728

Dx = 1.334 Mg m−3 Melting point = 405–406 K Mo radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 22 reflections θ = 18.3–19.7°

µ = 0.09 mm−1

T = 290 K Prism, colorles 0.25 × 0.25 × 0.25 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator

non–profiled ω/2θ scans 4181 measured reflections 1928 independent reflections 1093 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Rint = 0.077

θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.1°

h = 0→10 k = 0→15 l = −19→19

3 standard reflections every 120 min intensity decay: 5%

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Least-squares matrix: full R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.049

wR(F2) = 0.126

S = 0.98 1928 reflections 226 parameters 0 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H-atom parameters constrained w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.0562P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001

(5)

supporting information

sup-2 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o2582–o2584

Special details

Experimental. Spectroscopic analysis: IR (KBr pellet, cm-1). The ν

C—H vibrations of the aromatic ring (A) appears at 3065w and 3024m. The bend at 3000 was assigned to the νC—H of double C—C bond. The middle intensity bands between 2961 and 2811 are attributed to νC—H vibrations of methine, methilene. The very strong band at 1735 was ascribed to νC=O of the acetyl group. The middle band at 1617 is attributed to νC=C bond. The band at 1609 belongs to 8a radial vibration of aromatic ring A. The bands at 1504 an 1449 could be attributed to 19a and 19b vibrations of the aromatic ring. The series of very strong bands between 1202 and 1234 can be assigned to different νC—O vibrations. The bands between 821 and 741 could be attributed to out-of-plane C—H vibrations of aromatic ring.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

C1 0.6225 (6) 0.3247 (4) 0.1383 (3) 0.0483 (12)

H1 0.5502 0.3233 0.0938 0.058*

C2 0.7799 (5) 0.3328 (4) 0.1186 (3) 0.0473 (12)

H2 0.8102 0.3344 0.0610 0.057*

C3 0.8914 (5) 0.3385 (4) 0.1818 (3) 0.0439 (11) C4 0.8413 (5) 0.3333 (3) 0.2660 (2) 0.0370 (10) C5 0.8181 (5) 0.3677 (4) 0.4090 (3) 0.0400 (11)

H5 0.8542 0.3394 0.4643 0.048*

C6 0.8011 (5) 0.4887 (4) 0.4152 (3) 0.0466 (12)

H6 0.8361 0.5108 0.4726 0.056*

C7 0.6423 (5) 0.5318 (4) 0.4006 (3) 0.0484 (12)

H7 0.6329 0.6041 0.3933 0.058*

C8 0.5146 (5) 0.4752 (4) 0.3975 (3) 0.0476 (12)

H8 0.4208 0.5098 0.3890 0.057*

C9 0.3877 (5) 0.3035 (4) 0.3535 (3) 0.0447 (12)

H9 0.2883 0.3352 0.3696 0.054*

C10 0.4069 (5) 0.3193 (4) 0.2553 (3) 0.0456 (12)

H10A 0.3505 0.2640 0.2257 0.055*

H10B 0.3596 0.3857 0.2394 0.055*

C11 0.5721 (5) 0.3189 (3) 0.2236 (2) 0.0396 (11) C12 0.6867 (5) 0.3202 (3) 0.2853 (2) 0.0353 (10) C13 0.6682 (5) 0.3110 (4) 0.3811 (2) 0.0377 (11) C14 0.5126 (5) 0.3586 (4) 0.4068 (3) 0.0446 (12)

H14 0.4942 0.3421 0.4677 0.054*

C15 0.6655 (5) 0.1945 (3) 0.4083 (3) 0.0459 (12)

H15A 0.7613 0.1610 0.3906 0.055*

H15B 0.6583 0.1899 0.4707 0.055*

C16 0.5293 (6) 0.1374 (4) 0.3679 (3) 0.0517 (13)

(6)

supporting information

sup-3 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o2582–o2584

H16B 0.5219 0.0673 0.3921 0.062*

C17 0.2511 (6) 0.1353 (5) 0.3509 (3) 0.0714 (17)

H17A 0.1580 0.1742 0.3622 0.107*

H17B 0.2458 0.0685 0.3796 0.107*

H17C 0.2619 0.1245 0.2899 0.107*

C18 1.1006 (6) 0.3568 (7) 0.0835 (3) 0.113 (3)

H19A 1.2114 0.3635 0.0829 0.170*

H19B 1.0549 0.4177 0.0572 0.170*

H19C 1.0709 0.2952 0.0517 0.170*

C19 1.0504 (6) 0.5448 (4) 0.3678 (4) 0.0550 (13) C20 1.1353 (6) 0.5749 (4) 0.2888 (3) 0.0673 (16)

H20A 1.0627 0.5894 0.2434 0.101*

H20B 1.2022 0.5184 0.2716 0.101*

H20C 1.1962 0.6365 0.3001 0.101*

N1 0.3838 (4) 0.1937 (3) 0.3830 (2) 0.0490 (10) O1 1.0489 (4) 0.3480 (3) 0.16893 (19) 0.0593 (10) O2 0.9292 (3) 0.3416 (2) 0.34055 (16) 0.0445 (8) O3 0.8967 (4) 0.5397 (3) 0.3518 (2) 0.0510 (8) O4 1.1055 (4) 0.5238 (4) 0.4367 (3) 0.0827 (13)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

(7)

supporting information

sup-4 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o2582–o2584

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—C11 1.392 (6) C10—H10B 0.9700

C1—C2 1.396 (6) C11—C12 1.374 (5)

C1—H1 0.9300 C12—C13 1.497 (5)

C2—C3 1.374 (6) C13—C14 1.526 (6)

C2—H2 0.9300 C13—C15 1.541 (6)

C3—C4 1.376 (6) C14—H14 0.9800

C3—O1 1.379 (5) C15—C16 1.517 (6)

C4—C12 1.377 (6) C15—H15A 0.9700

C4—O2 1.385 (4) C15—H15B 0.9700

C5—O2 1.467 (5) C16—N1 1.464 (6)

C5—C13 1.542 (6) C16—H16A 0.9700

C5—C6 1.550 (6) C16—H16B 0.9700

C5—H5 0.9800 C17—N1 1.453 (6)

C6—O3 1.437 (5) C17—H17A 0.9600

C6—C7 1.493 (6) C17—H17B 0.9600

C6—H6 0.9800 C17—H17C 0.9600

C7—C8 1.318 (7) C18—O1 1.401 (5)

C7—H7 0.9300 C18—H19A 0.9600

C8—C14 1.491 (7) C18—H19B 0.9600

C8—H8 0.9300 C18—H19C 0.9600

C9—N1 1.471 (6) C19—O4 1.198 (6)

C9—C14 1.527 (6) C19—O3 1.350 (6)

C9—C10 1.543 (6) C19—C20 1.476 (7)

C9—H9 0.9800 C20—H20A 0.9600

C10—C11 1.508 (5) C20—H20B 0.9600

C10—H10A 0.9700 C20—H20C 0.9600

C11—C1—C2 121.0 (4) C14—C13—C15 107.3 (4)

C11—C1—H1 119.5 C12—C13—C5 98.7 (3)

C2—C1—H1 119.5 C14—C13—C5 118.6 (3)

C3—C2—C1 121.9 (4) C15—C13—C5 112.7 (4)

C3—C2—H2 119.0 C8—C14—C13 111.1 (4)

C1—C2—H2 119.0 C8—C14—C9 114.4 (4)

C2—C3—C4 116.9 (4) C13—C14—C9 107.3 (3)

C2—C3—O1 126.3 (4) C8—C14—H14 107.9

C4—C3—O1 116.8 (4) C13—C14—H14 107.9

C3—C4—C12 121.0 (4) C9—C14—H14 107.9

C3—C4—O2 127.9 (4) C16—C15—C13 111.1 (4)

C12—C4—O2 111.1 (3) C16—C15—H15A 109.4

O2—C5—C13 103.9 (3) C13—C15—H15A 109.4

O2—C5—C6 109.3 (3) C16—C15—H15B 109.4

C13—C5—C6 113.8 (4) C13—C15—H15B 109.4

O2—C5—H5 109.9 H15A—C15—H15B 108.0

C13—C5—H5 109.9 N1—C16—C15 111.3 (4)

C6—C5—H5 109.9 N1—C16—H16A 109.4

(8)

supporting information

sup-5 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o2582–o2584

O3—C6—C5 110.7 (4) N1—C16—H16B 109.4

C7—C6—C5 116.3 (4) C15—C16—H16B 109.4

O3—C6—H6 108.2 H16A—C16—H16B 108.0

C7—C6—H6 108.2 N1—C17—H17A 109.5

C5—C6—H6 108.2 N1—C17—H17B 109.5

C8—C7—C6 124.9 (5) H17A—C17—H17B 109.5

C8—C7—H7 117.6 N1—C17—H17C 109.5

C6—C7—H7 117.6 H17A—C17—H17C 109.5

C7—C8—C14 123.4 (5) H17B—C17—H17C 109.5

C7—C8—H8 118.3 O1—C18—H19A 109.5

C14—C8—H8 118.3 O1—C18—H19B 109.5

N1—C9—C14 106.5 (4) H19A—C18—H19B 109.5

N1—C9—C10 115.6 (4) O1—C18—H19C 109.5

C14—C9—C10 113.4 (4) H19A—C18—H19C 109.5

N1—C9—H9 106.9 H19B—C18—H19C 109.5

C14—C9—H9 106.9 O4—C19—O3 122.9 (5)

C10—C9—H9 106.9 O4—C19—C20 126.8 (5)

C11—C10—C9 114.9 (3) O3—C19—C20 110.3 (5)

C11—C10—H10A 108.5 C19—C20—H20A 109.5

C9—C10—H10A 108.5 C19—C20—H20B 109.5

C11—C10—H10B 108.5 H20A—C20—H20B 109.5

C9—C10—H10B 108.5 C19—C20—H20C 109.5

H10A—C10—H10B 107.5 H20A—C20—H20C 109.5

C12—C11—C1 115.7 (4) H20B—C20—H20C 109.5

C12—C11—C10 117.0 (3) C17—N1—C16 111.7 (4)

C1—C11—C10 127.1 (4) C17—N1—C9 113.5 (4)

C11—C12—C4 123.2 (4) C16—N1—C9 113.3 (4)

C11—C12—C13 127.7 (4) C3—O1—C18 117.2 (4)

C4—C12—C13 109.1 (4) C4—O2—C5 105.1 (3)

C12—C13—C14 108.7 (4) C19—O3—C6 117.3 (4)

C12—C13—C15 110.4 (4)

(9)

supporting information

sup-6 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o2582–o2584

C3—C4—C12—C13 176.7 (4) C4—C12—C13—C5 23.3 (5) C6—C5—O2—C4 −89.3 (4) C4—C12—C13—C14 147.6 (4) C13—C5—O2—C4 32.5 (4) C4—C12—C13—C15 −95.0 (5) O2—C5—C6—O3 0.8 (5) C11—C12—C13—C5 −155.3 (5) O2—C5—C6—C7 120.4 (4) C11—C12—C13—C14 −30.9 (6) C13—C5—C6—O3 −114.7 (4) C11—C12—C13—C15 86.5 (5) C13—C5—C6—C7 4.8 (5) C5—C13—C14—C8 40.8 (5) O2—C5—C13—C12 −33.0 (4) C5—C13—C14—C9 166.5 (4) O2—C5—C13—C14 −150.1 (4) C12—C13—C14—C8 −70.8 (5) O2—C5—C13—C15 83.4 (4) C12—C13—C14—C9 54.9 (5) C6—C5—C13—C12 85.7 (4) C15—C13—C14—C8 169.8 (4) C6—C5—C13—C14 −31.3 (5) C15—C13—C14—C9 −64.5 (4) C6—C5—C13—C15 −157.8 (4) C5—C13—C15—C16 −171.0 (3) C5—C6—O3—C19 −76.4 (5) C12—C13—C15—C16 −61.7 (5) C7—C6—O3—C19 157.5 (4) C14—C13—C15—C16 56.6 (5) O3—C6—C7—C8 134.4 (5) C13—C15—C16—N1 −51.2 (5) C5—C6—C7—C8 11.8 (7) C15—C16—N1—C9 55.2 (5) C6—C7—C8—C14 −1.0 (8) C15—C16—N1—C17 −175.1 (4) C7—C8—C14—C9 −146.5 (4) O4—C19—O3—C6 −11.8 (7) C7—C8—C14—C13 −24.8 (6) C20—C19—O3—C6 166.1 (4)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A

C5—H5···N1i 0.98 2.42 3.363 (5) 163

C20—H20C···Cg1ii 0.96 2.52 3.421 (2) 157

Figure

Table 1Selected torsion angles (�).

References

Related documents

Following NASH diet feeding, Nrg4-Tg mice had moderately lower liver fat content (Figure 3A), slightly smaller lipid droplets in hepatocytes (Supple- mental Figure 3, E and F),

Under Regulation 21 (3) you are required to: Retain records set out in Schedule 3 of the Health Act 2007 (Care and Support of Residents in Designated Centres for Persons (Children

TTN has four major components: (1) a simplified topic model (STM) to infer the la- tent topic distributions of arguments as topic-level representations; (2) a GCN-based encoder to

The indexing of The Journal of Social Sciences Research (Online ISSN: 2411-9458/Print ISSN: 2413-6670) is questionable because it was considered for evaluation before it had

The results of this research shows that Discount rate news is significant and positive variable in explanation of unexpected stock return variation whereas the

Enrollment-Based No Pass, No Drive policies, the largest group of policies, which target both enrollment and attendance, have negligible effects on dropout rates, but decrease

Our explicit retrofitting framework brings to- gether desirable properties of both model classes: (1) unlike joint models, it does not require adap- tation to the

For each conversation in the tech support data, we sample context and response pairs to create a dataset similar to the Ubuntu dataset format. Note that multiple context-response