• No results found

Dipropiodurene

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Dipropiodurene"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

organic papers

o1854

Pinkuset al. C

16H22O2 doi:10.1107/S160053680601261X Acta Cryst.(2006). E62, o1854–o1855

Acta Crystallographica Section E

Structure Reports Online

ISSN 1600-5368

Dipropiodurene

A. G. Pinkus,* Kevin K.

Klausmeyer, Cody E. Carson and Herman C. Custard

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Baylor University, One Bear Place No. 97348, Waco, TX 76798-7348, USA

Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Key indicators

Single-crystal X-ray study T= 110 K

Mean(C–C) = 0.001 A˚ Rfactor = 0.038 wRfactor = 0.108

Data-to-parameter ratio = 20.2

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

Received 15 March 2006 Accepted 6 April 2006

#2006 International Union of Crystallography All rights reserved

The conformer present in the crystal structure of the title compound [systematic name: 1,10-(2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-p

-phenylene)dipropan-1-one], C16H22O2, lies on an inversion

center and consequently has the two carbonyl groups in atrans

orientation relative to the central ring. In the crystalline state, the planes of the carbonyl and attached methylene groups are at a dihedral angle of 86.50 (11)relative to the central ring.

Comment

In the present crystallographic study of the title compound, (I), the two carbonyl groups and attached methylene C atoms are in a transorientation relative to the central ring (Fig. 1) due to the inversion center at the mid-point of the benzene ring. The planes of the carbonyl group and attached methylene C atom are at an angle of 86.50 (11) relative to the central

ring. This can be compared with a crystallographic study of 1,4-bis(4-chlorobenzoyl)-2,3,5,6-tetramethylbenzene by Ferguson et al. (1993), who found that the two p -chloro-benzoyl groups were also in atransorientation with a corre-sponding angle of 85.9. A crystallographic study (Bearet al.,

1973) of a compound with a large pivaloyl group between two methyl groups (2,4,6-trimethyl-3-pivaloylbenzoic acid) reported the mean planes through the keto group and the benzene ring to have a dihedral angle of 89.9. This compound was resolved but was found to undergo rapid racemization (Pinkus et al., 1968). The corresponding angle for a related hindered duryl ester, ethyl 2,3,5,6-tetramethylbenzoate (Pinkuset al., 2005), was found to be 79.9.

Selected geometric parameters are presented in Table 1. All other bonds and angles are within expected ranges.

Experimental

(2)

washings with water and final drying over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was removed by distillation and the product was recrystallized from benzene in 19% yield (9.3 g), m.p. 453.0–453.6 K [literature value 451 K (Baum & Meyer, 1895) 451 K]. Analysis calculated for C16H22O2: C 78.01, H 9.00%; found (Galbraith Labs,

Knoxville, Tennessee, USA): C 78.19, H, 9.07%. IR (dichloro-methane): 1703 cm1(C Ostr).

Crystal data

C16H22O2

Mr= 246.34

Orthorhombic,Pbca a= 8.6268 (14) A˚

b= 7.682 (3) A˚

c= 21.034 (4) A˚

V= 1393.9 (6) A˚3

Z= 4

Dx= 1.174 Mg m 3 MoKradiation

= 0.08 mm1

T= 110 (2) K Block, colorless 0.300.250.21 mm

Data collection

Bruker X8 APEX area-detector diffractometer

’and!scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)

Tmin= 0.974,Tmax= 0.987

12799 measured reflections 1715 independent reflections 1535 reflections withI> 2(I)

Rint= 0.034

max= 28.2

Refinement

Refinement onF2

R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.038

wR(F2) = 0.108

S= 1.06 1715 reflections 85 parameters

H-atom parameters constrained

w= 1/[2(F

o2) + (0.0591P)2 + 0.3963P]

whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3 (/)max= 0.001

max= 0.37 e A˚

3 min=0.16 e A˚

3

Table 1

Selected geometric parameters (A˚ ,).

C5—O1 1.2124 (13) C2—C5 1.5137 (12)

C5—C6 1.5101 (14)

C6—C5—C2 116.46 (8)

All H atoms were included in calculated positions, with C—H = 0.98 and 0.99 A˚ , and withUiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Data collection:APEX2(Bruker, 2003); cell refinement:APEX2; data reduction:SAINT-Plus(Bruker, 2003); program(s) used to solve

structure:SHELXS97(Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics:

SHELXTL(Sheldrick, 2000); software used to prepare material for publication:SHELXTL.

The Bruker X8 APEX diffractometer was purchased with funds received from the National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentation Program, grant No. CHE-0321214. KKK and AGP thank the Robert A. Welch Foundation for support (grant Nos. AA-1508 and AA-111, respectively).

References

Baum, F. & Meyer, V. (1895).Berichte,28, 3212–3215.

Bear, C. A., Macdonald, A. L. & Trotter, J. (1973).Acta Cryst.B29, 2617–2619. Bruker (2003).APEX2 (Version 1.0-27) and SAINT-Plus (Version 6.25).

Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Ferguson, G., Patterson, K. H. & Smith, D. M. (1993).Acta Cryst.C49, 190– 192.

Pinkus, A. G., Klausmeyer, K. K., Feazell, R. P. & Lin, E. C. H. Y. (2005).Acta Cryst.E61, o662–o663.

Pinkus, A. G., Riggs, J. I. & Broughton, S. I. (1968).J. Am. Chem. Soc.90, 5043–5044.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1996).SADABS. University of Gottingen, Germany. Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of

Go¨ttingen, Germany.

[image:2.610.316.563.72.201.2]

Sheldrick, G. M. (2000).SHELXTL. Version 6.10. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Figure 1

A view of the molecular structure of (I), with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii. Unlabeled atoms are related to labeled atoms by the symmetry code (x+ 1,y,

(3)

supporting information

sup-1 Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, o1854–o1855

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, o1854–o1855 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680601261X]

Dipropiodurene

A. G. Pinkus, Kevin K. Klausmeyer, Cody E. Carson and Herman C. Custard

1,1′-(2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-p-phenylene)dipropan-1-one or 2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-1,4-dipropiophenone

Crystal data

C16H22O2 Mr = 246.34

Orthorhombic, Pbca

Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2ab

a = 8.6268 (14) Å

b = 7.682 (3) Å

c = 21.034 (4) Å

V = 1393.9 (6) Å3 Z = 4

F(000) = 536

Dx = 1.174 Mg m−3

Mo radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 6682 reflections

θ = 3.1–35.0°

µ = 0.08 mm−1 T = 110 K Block, colorless 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.21 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator

φ and ω scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)

Tmin = 0.974, Tmax = 0.987

12799 measured reflections 1715 independent reflections 1535 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Rint = 0.034

θmax = 28.2°, θmin = 3.1°

h = −11→11

k = −9→10

l = −27→19

Refinement

Refinement on F2

Least-squares matrix: full

R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038 wR(F2) = 0.108 S = 1.06 1715 reflections 85 parameters 0 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H-atom parameters constrained

w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.0591P)2 + 0.3963P]

where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

(Δ/σ)max = 0.001

Δρmax = 0.37 e Å−3

Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3

Special details

(4)

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2,

conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used

only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2

are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

C2 0.47454 (10) 0.04316 (11) 0.56283 (4) 0.0168 (2)

C3 0.34707 (10) 0.02262 (12) 0.52226 (4) 0.0170 (2)

C1 0.62736 (11) 0.02124 (12) 0.54173 (4) 0.0171 (2)

C5 0.44501 (10) 0.08889 (12) 0.63178 (4) 0.0183 (2)

C4 0.18314 (11) 0.04672 (13) 0.54611 (4) 0.0213 (2)

H4A 0.1855 0.0812 0.5910 0.032*

H4B 0.1261 −0.0629 0.5417 0.032*

H4C 0.1316 0.1375 0.5211 0.032*

C6 0.41512 (13) −0.06156 (13) 0.67633 (4) 0.0240 (2)

H6A 0.5107 −0.1323 0.6796 0.029*

H6B 0.3333 −0.1363 0.6578 0.029*

C7 0.36562 (15) −0.00711 (17) 0.74265 (5) 0.0343 (3)

H7A 0.4465 0.0655 0.7617 0.051*

H7B 0.3496 −0.1110 0.7689 0.051*

H7C 0.2688 0.0592 0.7401 0.051*

O1 0.44569 (9) 0.23882 (10) 0.64977 (3) 0.0274 (2)

C8 0.76383 (11) 0.04693 (13) 0.58593 (4) 0.0217 (2)

H8A 0.8230 −0.0617 0.5889 0.033*

H8B 0.7262 0.0797 0.6282 0.033*

H8C 0.8307 0.1395 0.5693 0.033*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

C2 0.0185 (4) 0.0160 (4) 0.0159 (4) −0.0002 (3) −0.0006 (3) 0.0017 (3)

C3 0.0161 (4) 0.0167 (4) 0.0183 (4) 0.0001 (3) −0.0003 (3) 0.0020 (3)

C1 0.0173 (4) 0.0169 (4) 0.0170 (4) −0.0003 (3) −0.0024 (3) 0.0021 (3)

C5 0.0159 (4) 0.0220 (5) 0.0172 (4) 0.0004 (3) −0.0015 (3) 0.0002 (3)

C4 0.0168 (4) 0.0255 (5) 0.0214 (4) 0.0002 (4) 0.0001 (3) −0.0003 (3)

C6 0.0301 (5) 0.0244 (5) 0.0175 (4) −0.0011 (4) 0.0020 (4) 0.0021 (3)

C7 0.0463 (7) 0.0376 (6) 0.0189 (5) 0.0031 (5) 0.0064 (4) 0.0024 (4)

O1 0.0357 (4) 0.0226 (4) 0.0238 (4) −0.0004 (3) 0.0001 (3) −0.0032 (3)

C8 0.0179 (4) 0.0269 (5) 0.0204 (4) −0.0001 (4) −0.0043 (3) 0.0002 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C2—C3 1.4009 (12) C4—H4C 0.9800

C2—C1 1.4012 (13) C6—C7 1.5177 (14)

(5)

supporting information

sup-3 Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, o1854–o1855

C5—C6 1.5101 (14) C7—H7A 0.9800

C3—C1i 1.4049 (13) C7—H7B 0.9800

C3—C4 1.5119 (13) C7—H7C 0.9800

C1—C8 1.5130 (12) C8—H8A 0.9800

C4—H4A 0.9800 C8—H8B 0.9800

C4—H4B 0.9800 C8—H8C 0.9800

C3—C2—C1 122.14 (8) C5—C6—C7 114.05 (9)

C3—C2—C5 118.54 (8) C5—C6—H6A 108.7

C1—C2—C5 119.32 (8) C7—C6—H6A 108.7

C2—C3—C1i 119.17 (8) C5—C6—H6B 108.7

C2—C3—C4 121.22 (8) C7—C6—H6B 108.7

C1i—C3—C4 119.61 (8) H6A—C6—H6B 107.6

C2—C1—C3i 118.68 (8) C6—C7—H7A 109.5

C2—C1—C8 121.46 (8) C6—C7—H7B 109.5

C3i—C1—C8 119.85 (8) H7A—C7—H7B 109.5

O1—C5—C6 122.29 (9) C6—C7—H7C 109.5

O1—C5—C2 121.25 (8) H7A—C7—H7C 109.5

C6—C5—C2 116.46 (8) H7B—C7—H7C 109.5

C3—C4—H4A 109.5 C1—C8—H8A 109.5

C3—C4—H4B 109.5 C1—C8—H8B 109.5

H4A—C4—H4B 109.5 H8A—C8—H8B 109.5

C3—C4—H4C 109.5 C1—C8—H8C 109.5

H4A—C4—H4C 109.5 H8A—C8—H8C 109.5

H4B—C4—H4C 109.5 H8B—C8—H8C 109.5

C1—C2—C5—O1 86.50 (11)

Figure

Figure 1

References

Related documents

Junior Positive mental health inventory prepared by Agashe and Helode (2009) was used as psychological instrument in the present study.Results reveal significant impact of yoga

21 Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, The Second Affiliated hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University, 1 Xinsi Road, Xian, Shanxi Province 710038, People ’ s

The total coliform count from this study range between 25cfu/100ml in Joju and too numerous to count (TNTC) in Oju-Ore, Sango, Okede and Ijamido HH water samples as

We present a novel hierarchical prior struc- ture for supervised transfer learning in named entity recognition, motivated by the common structure of feature spaces for this task

Gerade die anteilige Übernahme der Kosten für Assistenzsysteme kann langfristig die Kosten der Pflege- und auch Krankenkassen reduzieren, da angenommen wird, das

It was decided that with the presence of such significant red flag signs that she should undergo advanced imaging, in this case an MRI, that revealed an underlying malignancy, which

Also, both diabetic groups there were a positive immunoreactivity of the photoreceptor inner segment, and this was also seen among control ani- mals treated with a

significantly upregulated the level of MDA, but Figure 4. The expression level of Akt-P53 signal pathway related proteins in HeLa cells after of carbon ion radiation for 72 h.